The Chain Rule

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 окт 2024

Комментарии • 16

  • @ChristopherLum
    @ChristopherLum  Месяц назад

    In case it is helpful, here are all my calculus videos in a single playlist ruclips.net/p/PLxdnSsBqCrrGHwNWnP5XVhytcGL9ExuPE. You can support this channel via Patreon at www.patreon.com/christopherwlum or by clicking on the 'Thanks' button underneath the video. Please let me know what you think in the comments. Thanks for watching!

  • @dsizov
    @dsizov Месяц назад +3

    The Jacobian part is absolutely brilliant! Thanks Chris

    • @ChristopherLum
      @ChristopherLum  Месяц назад

      I'm glad it was helpful, thanks for watching!

  • @ebrewste
    @ebrewste Месяц назад +2

    I’ve never seen the decomposition approach. It makes deeper sense than memorizing the chain rule!

  • @bosanova1643
    @bosanova1643 Месяц назад +2

    Merci !
    From France

    • @bosanova1643
      @bosanova1643 Месяц назад +2

      A playlist on sensor fusion? KF, EKF, UKF, etc.?

    • @ChristopherLum
      @ChristopherLum  Месяц назад

      Hi,
      First let me say thank you for your generous support of the channel, it is very much appreciated! Thanks for the suggestions on KF, EKF, etc. I'm working on some estimation and observer videos and hope to have the up soon. In any event, I want to again say thank you for your contribution and for supporting the channel. I hope to hear from you at a future RUclips video!
      -Chris

  • @SomeTechGuy666
    @SomeTechGuy666 Месяц назад

    The Julia language is excellent at doing work like this. You should incorporate it into your teachings.

  • @FatherGapon-gw6yo
    @FatherGapon-gw6yo Месяц назад +2

    I am a simple cat-I see Lum and I click play.

  • @rfo3225
    @rfo3225 Месяц назад

    Thank you for your many helpful videos. Just one minor point. In the first portion, shouldn't the cubic function f be negative for negative x instead of positive as drawn in the rough graph. I only point it out because it may confuse and distract some. Thanks.

    • @ChristopherLum
      @ChristopherLum  Месяц назад +1

      Thanks for catching this, you are absolutely correct and this picture is inaccurate for negative x values. I made a note of this in the video. The lecture notes that are associated with this video are correct. Thanks again for bringing this up and nice job noticing these inconsistencies. If you see anything else in this or other videos please let me know. Thanks for watching!

  • @dsizov
    @dsizov Месяц назад +2

    But why should we multiply the two rates, and not, say, add them together? IMO this part is the hardest to explain

    • @bosanova1643
      @bosanova1643 Месяц назад +1

      I think it should be seen as leverage effects in a chain. If I have two levers connected and equal, a small amplitude variation on the first lever will be reproduced with the same amplitude at the end of the second lever. Depending on the length of the levers, the amplitude of the variation can be multiplied or reduced (demultiplied), allowing for adjustments in the range of movements

    • @bosanova1643
      @bosanova1643 Месяц назад

      Of course, the different lever arm ratios represent the rates of variation. For example, a 1:2 ratio linked to another 1:2 will give an amplitude of 1:4.
      A 1:1 ratio linked to another 1:1 will give an amplitude of 1.A 3:1 ratio linked to a 2:1 will give an amplitude of 6:1.

  • @Mandollr
    @Mandollr Месяц назад

    Can you make a lesson about Kalman Filter ?

  • @rfo3225
    @rfo3225 Месяц назад

    Perhaps you meant to indicate a graph of h(u) instead of the label f(x).