6:02 I would not introduce lamdas showing an '[ ] { }' example. and I would not call it the basic version, as it is a specialized version of the general form of a lamda, when it does not use/needs any arguments. I would show the general form of a lambda '[ ] ( ) { }' with its capture, the argument list and the function body. this also has the advantage to literally see, that a lamda is an unnamed function. a function has the form of 'function_name (argument-list) { function_body }', but the lambda has no function_name and is preceded by the capture, thus having the form '[ capture-list ] (argument-list) { function_body }'. recognizing such analogies helps to understand (at least for me), that lamdas are just anonymous functions (with some specialities).
nice sir,people say's that c++ to fast so why haven't someone haven't done project on RUclips like html+cpp+css+ javascript so one can see how fast is that....
Nice series on C++ 11, thanks. Just one constructive criticism regarding this video: it took 5 minutes to get into the code, which seems way too long. Otherwise, very clear and informative. 👍
The way this guy sighs in his videos makes me believe that he really dislikes doing all this. He's good at teaching, but his lack of any kind of enthusiasm shows and hurts the learning process IMO. You don't have to be overly cheerful, just not so dejected.
I think it would be more complete if you showed the real type of lambda function, rather than using auto declaration, so that it's clear in case it's needed - as it would be for a pointer to a class function -
best lambda explanation I have seen so far.
thank you professor hank
Glad it was helpful!
Thank you so much. It really helpful
6:02 I would not introduce lamdas showing an '[ ] { }' example. and I would not call it the basic version, as it is a specialized version of the general form of a lamda, when it does not use/needs any arguments.
I would show the general form of a lambda '[ ] ( ) { }' with its capture, the argument list and the function body. this also has the advantage to literally see, that a lamda is an unnamed function. a function has the form of 'function_name (argument-list) { function_body }', but the lambda has no function_name and is preceded by the capture, thus having the form '[ capture-list ] (argument-list) { function_body }'. recognizing such analogies helps to understand (at least for me), that lamdas are just anonymous functions (with some specialities).
very clear explanation, appreciate sharing video with us 😀
great videos ! subscribed buddy, very informative videos about c++11
Thanks for the kind words!
Thank you so much for the video, its very clear.
Glad it was helpful!
Very good video 👍
Thank you 👍
Cool Stuff 👍, Thanks for Sharing
No problem 👍
i like your explanantion, Professor
Thanks! 😃
nice sir,people say's that c++ to fast so why haven't someone haven't done project on RUclips like html+cpp+css+ javascript so one can see how fast is that....
Not sure, but looking at your bit here:
html+cpp+css+javascript
what comes to mind for me is...
"one of these things is not like the other things..."
Nice series on C++ 11, thanks. Just one constructive criticism regarding this video: it took 5 minutes to get into the code, which seems way too long. Otherwise, very clear and informative. 👍
Thanks for the comment and I agree with you about the time thing. When I update this video, I will definitely cut down on the intro part.
Why only auto keyword used
ruclips.net/video/0oWqi1e9d0A/видео.html
@@ProfessorHankStalica tqsm sir
Why would C++ tutorials come with political statements?
So you just think it would be totally okay to let a bunch of racist, unvaccinated programs loose in the wild?
The way this guy sighs in his videos makes me believe that he really dislikes doing all this. He's good at teaching, but his lack of any kind of enthusiasm shows and hurts the learning process IMO. You don't have to be overly cheerful, just not so dejected.
I think it's rather calming. Gets the info across and be done. I can get why he is bored since this is basically learning the ABC stuff for him lol.
I think it would be more complete if you showed the real type of lambda function, rather than using auto declaration, so that it's clear in case it's needed - as it would be for a pointer to a class function -
Good idea. I'll look to add that when I update this video. Thanks for the suggestion.
@@ProfessorHankStalica thank you for your videos