Australia's plan should be seen as part of those of the wider West plus its East-Asian allies to counterbalance China and maintain peace and the rules-based order in the Indo-Pacific. Australia, with its 27 million inhabitants, would never be able to deter China on its own. But together, they might. Let's hope peace remains.
And then the moment you realize that Chinese craftsmanship and manufacturing is hilariously awful and the ships that they have built won't last a decade.
@siciliaussieguy Australia should develop the MQ28 ghost bat drone into a long-range bomber varent that can do 10.000 nortical milies like the B1B and not like the little pissy things they are building that have no more range than a F35 that has a similar payload. Australia might have some good engineers and has quite a good GDP, but the defence planners are a dam fool. Strait out of collage with no strategic knowledge on how to fight a war. Most people know whoever controls the sky will win. It's what won the war in the Pacific during ww2, not ships. If you have long-range stealth bombers flying at altitudes above 130.000 feet like the airliners, all armed with 20 or so anti ship missiles each and firing a few hundred kilometres away from its target The enamy is not going to have a fleet of ships for very long. Are they? You have to outsmart the enamy. Going into a ring playing by a set off rules, it can be anyone's game.
@siciliaussieguy I agree. But nothing has been delivered. The issue is the government. Australia has been stuck with a 20 to 30 year gap. According to the delivery process for completion of what they have ordered, that continues to be delayed. It won't be until the 2040s and 2050s until Australia has full capability of its defence review. And it will probably change in between. Setting back further delays. If you can't bring a capability into service. Within a decade into full service. 60% of that will change and remain only on paper without being delivered. with a new development and strategy taken its place repeating the previous problems
As an Australia, we were going to spend 90 billion on French Submarines, canceled, and we ended up paying close to a billion in settlement fees. We could have built two complete modernized fleets of PT(Patrol Torpedo) boats, 5mm(0.196in) steel hulls, with a Kevlar lining, running 3xE85 Barra engines doing 40+knots to protect our coasts. The navy could have gone a recruitment spree eased unemployment and implementing mandatory four year service for 18-40 year old's. But ah, common sense isn't to common these days. Not for politicians anyways.
@@tacitdionysus3220 *Modernized* PT boats, and even then, I'd still take a WW II PT boat into WW III over infantry. Those things were way ahead of their time.
The latest announcement by the federal government is great if it addresses one of the core issues with the ADF and the RAN in particular is the lack of personnel. More people are leaving the navy than are joining. Simply throwing money at the RAN and procuring new ships does not solve this basic issue - a lack of sailors. It is a grass roots level problem. Most of the ADF personnel have lost faith in the federal government and feel a lack of moral support from all the government bodies and law makers. Granted greater automation and advances in technology all help manning issues, but if you read between the lines new ships are unlikely to arrive in Australia before 2031 - far too late. This government missed several golden opportunities to have 3 new Hobart class destroyers built by Navantia in Spain delivered by 2030. Instead this government has persisted with the Type 26 frigate program which is way overbudget, now up to an expected increase of up to 5 billion per ship with the first being delivered after 2031. Similarly, it would seem that the federal government is unable to procure ships through multiple ship builders as well as ensuring our own ship building industry. With the governments track record of wasting money, dithering and basically mismanaging the contract and procurement process it is unlikely there will be any movement soon. Worse, the federal government will make really poor ship choices and the navy will end up with a bunch of expensive lemons. When will they start to actually wake up and buy off the shelf designs that meet the needs of the RAN rather than persist in making changes to less than ideal ships. Just look at the Type 26 frigates for example - was originally 8.000 plus Tonnes now. estimated to be over 10,000 tonnes. The accountability has gone out the window and the blame lays at the feet of the government and the ministers responsible for the respective portfolios.
In about 5 years it is project to have a fleet of 100 vessels, these 26 noted are certain types of fighting ships and do NOT represent the enrite navy. Basically it is evolving into a technically superior navy .
Have you served @Tonydjjokerit ? The situation in the ADF is dire atm . 40% of recruits are dropping out ! It is a big problem now. Imagine in the future with all this government military procurement. Conscription/National service is coming !!
Thanks for covering this incredible news. They was sure it was going to be amazing knowing how wonderful it would be praise she would receive for creating such a wonderful delighted work in the unbelievable pursuit of perfection . While the argument seems to be different the truth is it's always the same. Yes, the topic may be different or the circumstances, but when all said and done, it all came back to the same thing. They both knew it, but neither has the courage or strength to address the underlying issue. So they continue to argue.
Buddy, what you see on RUclips or the news isn't always the reality of how things are. Australia is screwed and it's all caused by the inside problem between the government and top defence personnel staff and defence industries. 1. Australia is facing aging military equipment. More equipment is getting decommissioned faster than being replaced. 2. Woke is killing the Australian defence force. Theirs more ADF personnel leaving faster than they can find recruits. 3. The Australian government continues to delay equipment or cancel and change equipment, causing further delays of equipment being delivered. What they say with the new defence review may not actually get delivered. Scuffle between ship builders and defence personnel and the government is a major issue in Australia. The Australian defence force likes to tamper with ship design for their requirements, causing dealys over budget and snags in the ships design. Through surtain cancellations in the past, it has cost ship builders to be understaffed because of giving redundancies. Surtain defence industries have invested in equipment than have it cancelled, causing the companies to lose money and don't get reimbursement for it. 4. Australia government committed to building 6 Hunter class frigate based on the British type 26 that has been downsized from 9 to 6. Due to over budget costs caused by its changes in design. The Australian government will make up the rest of the ASW fleet with 11 smaller off the shelf frigate designs that will probably end up with the same issues as the hunter.class frigate program as Australian defence will ask for surtain requirements to be added to the ship that will further delay the ships and price. 5. At the moment, Australia has 8 very lightly armed Anzac frigates with one out of service permanently for anti-submarine warfare surface combating vessels. 3 lightly armed air warfare destroyers based on Spanish f100 class that was originally designed as a large frigate. As the only surface combating vessels in the royal Australian navy. The rest are none combating OPV merchant navy and two LHD carriers. And 6 aging conventional powerd submarines. 6. The Australian government ordered new ships of a surface combating vessels to 26 from 10 currently in service. Although the timing of these vessels to be delivered is troubling for Australia defence. The first hunter class ship won't be built until 2033, and the last 2042. Theirs no guarantees on when the 11 smaller ships will be built. They haven't even decided on the varent till 2025, so how quick they can get them into service is another? 6 other optional crewed vessels getting built is another? Where are they getting them all built? 7. The US Congress is still to approve the transfer of the Virginia class submarines for Australia to get nuclear powerd submarines. When can Australia get new ones of them when the US is facing delays themselves. Anything can happen between now and 2040s. Australia is faced with a 20-year gap in defence. And a recruitment issue as nobody wants to join.
Yes that decision astounds me and was was in the Army. Blind Freddy could see we needed 12x F35B on each LCH carrier. The Spanish one that ours were designed off have harriers on theirs.
F35B has poor range and payload even of an aircraft carrier the radius of each jet is only around 1200km. So you could only cover 500km radius each way with the jet of the carrier making the carrier to close for comfort. F35C has double that but they not a jump jet. And requires a larger carrier
What about air support for an amphibious landing? That is what Canberra and Adelaide were made for. Why do the Marines use them? Without the harriers in the Falklands, the Brits may have lost. The Argentinian Airforce would have run riot if the Harriers were not there. We got short memories. @@Nathan-ry3yu
He is right on the money. We didn't think yet again. The Spanish have harriers on their LHD. The ADF cannot get anything right. We should have had F35B on Adelaide and Canberra. The yanks have F35B on all of their LHD's. @marksullivan2230
The problem is that the Australia surface fleet so small that it needs what they have ordered plus what you just stated. What Marles has decided will give Australia more coverage. But it's still not enough. Australia, due to the size of our geographic area that needs to cover, RAN should have at least 40 surface combating vessels. And about 30 submarines 12 nuclear powerd and about 18 conventional powerd subs. China has around 700+ warships and growing.
Also, to mention, since Australia has no aircraft carrier for our aircraft to have long range. I don't understand why we haven't built one. Or at least purchase long-range bombers. The war in the Pacific during ww2 was won by aircraft. I'm surprised RAAF went with the MQ 28 ghost bat drone fighters instead of building a long-range bomber, varent of it, and loaded it with anti ship missiles. The B1B bomb has a 14000 nortical mile range and can be loaded with as many 20 anti ship missiles in its internal bay. They could have built. A squadron or 2 here in Australia with a mq28 ghost bat drone bomber varent, and it would be as stealthy as the B2 stealth bomber. Just imagine how many ships they be able to sink with that
Indonesia has a population 10x ours. Would you and every other Aussie be prepared to pay 50% of your _net_ income for the next decade to pay for _"200 ships"_ ? 🤦♂
Thanks for covering this incredible news. I've was sure it was going to be amazing knowing how wonderful it would be praise she would receive for creating such a wonderful delighted work in the unbelievable pursuit of perfection a car in Las Vegas and have reserved a hotel in Twentynine Palms which is just north of Joshua Tree. We'll drive from Las Vegas through Mojave National Preserve and possibly do a short hike on our way down. Then spend all day on Monday at Joshua Tree. We can decide the next morning if we want to do more in Joshua Tree or Mojave before we head back.
The Knesset must dismiss Netanyahu and his government and choose the most appropriate person to hold negotiations, which are best for the people, including a permanent peace plan
Australia cannot match China’s industrial capacity for building warships. However, Ukraine has sunk or severely damaged multiple Russian warships with sea drones, neptune, and storm Shadow missiles. Perhaps Australia should focus more on asymmetric warfare and spend the money on anti ship missiles and drones. Not so say they shouldn’t build more ships but it shouldn’t be the primary focus
Need both. You have to be able to go to the enamy and cause damage also. Ukraine is a different place than Australia. The Russian black fleet isn't stationed far from them. And the pacific is a large place. China don't have to be off Australia coast to launch missile at us.
The Knesset must dismiss Netanyahu and his government and choose the most appropriate person to hold negotiations, which are best for the people, including a permanent peace plan
WE ARE ONE OF THE WEALTHIEST COUNTRIES WORLDWIDE WITH THE MOST VENEMOUS WILDLIFE lol -NEVER UNDERESTIMATE AUSTRALIA WITH CUTTING EDGE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
Compare the land areas and populations between China and Australia. China has lots of serious work to do than play with Australia over the long distance. Wasting money on some boats and sinkables? Why not? If you have lots to squander
Crux "Russia building up military power" Mean while russia military is losing alot of armored vehicles and has a dysfunctional military. Btw crux why is it that in other videos I asked for the name of the song, but yet you never respond back. I subscribed and had many other friends of mine subscribe. So I did you a favor and how about you do me a favor and tell me the name of the songs when I ask. Thank you.
OMG, look out now Aussie Aussie is going to have 20 row boats instead of just 10🤭😂?. Hopefully they can hold out 100 asylum seekers on rusty fishing trawlers & maybe patrol the shark nets more regularly now🤣?.
@@thepunisher3640 of coz we have, coast guard water police & Fisheries inspectors😂. The coast guard & water rats have very fast speed boats & the Fisheries inspectors watch the waters with big binoculars & arrest illegal small fish catchers 😂🤣, & anyone found swimming outside of the beach flags illegally will be seen with the new big spotlights on the Westpac Rescue Helicopter🤭🤣. This is new secret technology from our best friend USA, they said it's cutting edge, & not to tell anyone🤭🤣😂?. You are too much 😝, stop it!!.
Downg4ade brilliant frigate program but had to as Adelaide far to slow and incompetent, navy chiefs and public servents will totally stuff up the next batch and put them 10 years late and billions over budget and large unmanned surface ships dont exist yet in any navy. Money waste and cost blow out a given if Australian built, they will stuff up the next with same issues and the rest a dream. Labor government are predictable and useless.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
*that moment you find out china makes 16- 23 ships per year
Australia's plan should be seen as part of those of the wider West plus its East-Asian allies to counterbalance China and maintain peace and the rules-based order in the Indo-Pacific. Australia, with its 27 million inhabitants, would never be able to deter China on its own. But together, they might. Let's hope peace remains.
And then the moment you realize that Chinese craftsmanship and manufacturing is hilariously awful and the ships that they have built won't last a decade.
Same as how Russia recycle chips from washing machine lol never underestimate your enemy or you will end up as Ukraine@@windyaft
@@khanaliqasim1757 Russia is laughable right now. The world has seen them for what they are, all soap boxing, hyperbolic, tantrum throwers.
That may be true but Ukraine has shown it is possible to sink warships of an enemy with a much larger navy despite having fewer ships
Australia might be better of buying or leasing some more aircraft while they wait to build the new navy fleet.
WE ARE ONE OF THE WEALTHIEST COUNTRIES WORLDWIDE WITH THE MOST VENEMOUS WILDLIFE -NEVER UNDERESTIMATE AUSTRALIA WITH CUTTING EDGE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
FROM IRAN, CHINA OR RUSSIA.
@siciliaussieguy Australia should develop the MQ28 ghost bat drone into a long-range bomber varent that can do 10.000 nortical milies like the B1B and not like the little pissy things they are building that have no more range than a F35 that has a similar payload. Australia might have some good engineers and has quite a good GDP, but the defence planners are a dam fool. Strait out of collage with no strategic knowledge on how to fight a war. Most people know whoever controls the sky will win. It's what won the war in the Pacific during ww2, not ships. If you have long-range stealth bombers flying at altitudes above 130.000 feet like the airliners, all armed with 20 or so anti ship missiles each and firing a few hundred kilometres away from its target The enamy is not going to have a fleet of ships for very long. Are they? You have to outsmart the enamy. Going into a ring playing by a set off rules, it can be anyone's game.
@siciliaussieguy I agree. But nothing has been delivered. The issue is the government. Australia has been stuck with a 20 to 30 year gap. According to the delivery process for completion of what they have ordered, that continues to be delayed. It won't be until the 2040s and 2050s until Australia has full capability of its defence review. And it will probably change in between. Setting back further delays. If you can't bring a capability into service. Within a decade into full service. 60% of that will change and remain only on paper without being delivered. with a new development and strategy taken its place repeating the previous problems
As an Australia, we were going to spend 90 billion on French Submarines, canceled, and we ended up paying close to a billion in settlement fees. We could have built two complete modernized fleets of PT(Patrol Torpedo) boats, 5mm(0.196in) steel hulls, with a Kevlar lining, running 3xE85 Barra engines doing 40+knots to protect our coasts. The navy could have gone a recruitment spree eased unemployment and implementing mandatory four year service for 18-40 year old's. But ah, common sense isn't to common these days. Not for politicians anyways.
Could also allow foreign enlistment to help with the burden of manpower.
Promising citizenship for time spent aboard or throughout the armed forces.
PT Boats - what century are you in???
@@tacitdionysus3220 *Modernized* PT boats, and even then, I'd still take a WW II PT boat into WW III over infantry. Those things were way ahead of their time.
@@leiaorgana5098 If manpower was an issue and an exceptional screening process was implemented, something to consider.
it will be downsized and then scrapped as usual ..
The latest announcement by the federal government is great if it addresses one of the core issues with the ADF and the RAN in particular is the lack of personnel. More people are leaving the navy than are joining. Simply throwing money at the RAN and procuring new ships does not solve this basic issue - a lack of sailors. It is a grass roots level problem. Most of the ADF personnel have lost faith in the federal government and feel a lack of moral support from all the government bodies and law makers. Granted greater automation and advances in technology all help manning issues, but if you read between the lines new ships are unlikely to arrive in Australia before 2031 - far too late. This government missed several golden opportunities to have 3 new Hobart class destroyers built by Navantia in Spain delivered by 2030. Instead this government has persisted with the Type 26 frigate program which is way overbudget, now up to an expected increase of up to 5 billion per ship with the first being delivered after 2031. Similarly, it would seem that the federal government is unable to procure ships through multiple ship builders as well as ensuring our own ship building industry. With the governments track record of wasting money, dithering and basically mismanaging the contract and procurement process it is unlikely there will be any movement soon. Worse, the federal government will make really poor ship choices and the navy will end up with a bunch of expensive lemons. When will they start to actually wake up and buy off the shelf designs that meet the needs of the RAN rather than persist in making changes to less than ideal ships. Just look at the Type 26 frigates for example - was originally 8.000 plus Tonnes now. estimated to be over 10,000 tonnes. The accountability has gone out the window and the blame lays at the feet of the government and the ministers responsible for the respective portfolios.
Russian and Chinese are Evel country philippines always stand USA family
In about 5 years it is project to have a fleet of 100 vessels, these 26 noted are certain types of fighting ships and do NOT represent the enrite navy. Basically it is evolving into a technically superior navy .
Conscription will fix the crew requirement problem .
Probably what they will end up doing
@Nathan-ry3yu 💯
The UK is considering this and Australia is a commonwealth country .
I don't think so! This could backfire spectacularly. Better advertising and reforms in recruiting will be more effective!
Have you served @Tonydjjokerit ?
The situation in the ADF is dire atm .
40% of recruits are dropping out !
It is a big problem now.
Imagine in the future with all this government military procurement.
Conscription/National service is coming !!
Yep! I served in the 80s and in Northern Ireland!@@pacnbeans
Thanks for covering this incredible news. They was sure it was going to be amazing knowing how wonderful it would be praise she would receive for creating such a wonderful delighted work in the unbelievable pursuit of perfection . While the argument seems to be different the truth is it's always the same. Yes, the topic may be different or the circumstances, but when all said and done, it all came back to the same thing. They both knew it, but neither has the courage or strength to address the underlying issue. So they continue to argue.
Buddy, what you see on RUclips or the news isn't always the reality of how things are. Australia is screwed and it's all caused by the inside problem between the government and top defence personnel staff and defence industries.
1. Australia is facing aging military equipment. More equipment is getting decommissioned faster than being replaced.
2. Woke is killing the Australian defence force. Theirs more ADF personnel leaving faster than they can find recruits.
3. The Australian government continues to delay equipment or cancel and change equipment, causing further delays of equipment being delivered. What they say with the new defence review may not actually get delivered. Scuffle between ship builders and defence personnel and the government is a major issue in Australia. The Australian defence force likes to tamper with ship design for their requirements, causing dealys over budget and snags in the ships design. Through surtain cancellations in the past, it has cost ship builders to be understaffed because of giving redundancies. Surtain defence industries have invested in equipment than have it cancelled, causing the companies to lose money and don't get reimbursement for it.
4. Australia government committed to building 6 Hunter class frigate based on the British type 26 that has been downsized from 9 to 6. Due to over budget costs caused by its changes in design. The Australian government will make up the rest of the ASW fleet with 11 smaller off the shelf frigate designs that will probably end up with the same issues as the hunter.class frigate program as Australian defence will ask for surtain requirements to be added to the ship that will further delay the ships and price.
5. At the moment, Australia has 8 very lightly armed Anzac frigates with one out of service permanently for anti-submarine warfare surface combating vessels. 3 lightly armed air warfare destroyers based on Spanish f100 class that was originally designed as a large frigate. As the only surface combating vessels in the royal Australian navy. The rest are none combating OPV merchant navy and two LHD carriers. And 6 aging conventional powerd submarines.
6. The Australian government ordered new ships of a surface combating vessels to 26 from 10 currently in service. Although the timing of these vessels to be delivered is troubling for Australia defence. The first hunter class ship won't be built until 2033, and the last 2042. Theirs no guarantees on when the 11 smaller ships will be built. They haven't even decided on the varent till 2025, so how quick they can get them into service is another? 6 other optional crewed vessels getting built is another? Where are they getting them all built?
7. The US Congress is still to approve the transfer of the Virginia class submarines for Australia to get nuclear powerd submarines. When can Australia get new ones of them when the US is facing delays themselves.
Anything can happen between now and 2040s. Australia is faced with a 20-year gap in defence. And a recruitment issue as nobody wants to join.
Modern Naval warfare is fatal for humans.
Would be better off buying drone boats. Have they learnt nothing from Ukraine? Waste of friggin money. Fix the health system.
they are. fix your brain
Probably the biggest joke of the century.
a country with two aircraft carriers. yet does not have any (F35B) aircrafts to fly off the deck. wow what a smart country.
Yes that decision astounds me and was was in the Army. Blind Freddy could see we needed 12x F35B on each LCH carrier. The Spanish one that ours were designed off have harriers on theirs.
F35B has poor range and payload even of an aircraft carrier the radius of each jet is only around 1200km. So you could only cover 500km radius each way with the jet of the carrier making the carrier to close for comfort. F35C has double that but they not a jump jet. And requires a larger carrier
What about air support for an amphibious landing? That is what Canberra and Adelaide were made for. Why do the Marines use them? Without the harriers in the Falklands, the Brits may have lost. The Argentinian Airforce would have run riot if the Harriers were not there. We got short memories. @@Nathan-ry3yu
He is right on the money. We didn't think yet again. The Spanish have harriers on their LHD. The ADF cannot get anything right. We should have had F35B on Adelaide and Canberra. The yanks have F35B on all of their LHD's. @marksullivan2230
The Australian Defence Force is run by clowns mate.
Its never going to happen, it would upset our BEIJING Masters.
no countries around the world have the ship building capacities as China , not even US
U better build more than that 🇺🇸
Get rid of surface shipes, get the nucs plus additional swedish or german diesel subs, only surface ships should be patrol boats.
The problem is that the Australia surface fleet so small that it needs what they have ordered plus what you just stated.
What Marles has decided will give Australia more coverage. But it's still not enough. Australia, due to the size of our geographic area that needs to cover, RAN should have at least 40 surface combating vessels. And about 30 submarines 12 nuclear powerd and about 18 conventional powerd subs.
China has around 700+ warships and growing.
Also, to mention, since Australia has no aircraft carrier for our aircraft to have long range. I don't understand why we haven't built one. Or at least purchase long-range bombers. The war in the Pacific during ww2 was won by aircraft. I'm surprised RAAF went with the MQ 28 ghost bat drone fighters instead of building a long-range bomber, varent of it, and loaded it with anti ship missiles. The B1B bomb has a 14000 nortical mile range and can be loaded with as many 20 anti ship missiles in its internal bay. They could have built. A squadron or 2 here in Australia with a mq28 ghost bat drone bomber varent, and it would be as stealthy as the B2 stealth bomber. Just imagine how many ships they be able to sink with that
Not good enough! We need about 200 ships. That's what Indonesia has!
who would sale in them
Indonesia has a population 10x ours. Would you and every other Aussie be prepared to pay 50% of your _net_ income for the next decade to pay for _"200 ships"_ ? 🤦♂
Indonesia has trash equipment.
@@maxhugen very true
I'm not Aussie. I'm Finnish!
Australia's Buildup would trigred Indonesia arms race.... So yeah don't push some luck for that
Bring it on
Russia building up militairy power? They got way less ships then 2 years ago 😂😂😂
Russia loser Ukraine hahaha
Philippines watch buttile Russian vs Ukraine
Doesn't Scott Morrison work ,in a high position, for the US company that is going to construct this fleet.....corruption corruption corruption.
WTF? expand to 25??? Seriously?? Getdafvckouthere! LMFAO
Everyone's gearing up for War.. and things just keep getting worse
Thanks for covering this incredible news. I've was sure it was going to be amazing knowing how wonderful it would be praise she would receive for creating such a wonderful delighted work in the unbelievable pursuit of perfection a car in Las Vegas and have reserved a hotel in Twentynine Palms which is just north of Joshua Tree. We'll drive from Las Vegas through Mojave National Preserve and possibly do a short hike on our way down. Then spend all day on Monday at Joshua Tree. We can decide the next morning if we want to do more in Joshua Tree or Mojave before we head back.
The Knesset must dismiss Netanyahu and his government and choose the most appropriate person to hold negotiations, which are best for the people, including a permanent peace plan
Nah, Chinese manufacturing is among the worst in the world. I wouldn't be too worried about the nulber of vessels that they have.
Australia cannot match China’s industrial capacity for building warships. However, Ukraine has sunk or severely damaged multiple Russian warships with sea drones, neptune, and storm
Shadow missiles. Perhaps Australia should focus more on asymmetric warfare and spend the money on anti ship missiles and drones. Not so say they shouldn’t build more ships but it shouldn’t be the primary focus
Need both. You have to be able to go to the enamy and cause damage also. Ukraine is a different place than Australia. The Russian black fleet isn't stationed far from them. And the pacific is a large place. China don't have to be off Australia coast to launch missile at us.
The Knesset must dismiss Netanyahu and his government and choose the most appropriate person to hold negotiations, which are best for the people, including a permanent peace plan
Love from UK England British Britain rule britainna rules the waves 🇬🇧🏴
Anglosphere
WE ARE ONE OF THE WEALTHIEST COUNTRIES WORLDWIDE WITH THE MOST VENEMOUS WILDLIFE lol -NEVER UNDERESTIMATE AUSTRALIA WITH CUTTING EDGE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
How did the Trident missile test go? Embarrassing!
@@symphorosayee3118 someone who doesn't support the western democracy's but probably lives in one of their countries enjoying the liberties. EADC
@@jasoar1563 Oh i hit a nerve! GFY!
I would order AWD's from South Korea, Frigates from Japan's and Germany, they are already building them.
Missiles missiles missiles everybody says missiles missiles missiles
what?
Grow up
You first 🎉
Hey nay nay nathan bayfan
Relax old one , have a vegimite sandwich 🥪
🖖🫠
Compare the land areas and populations between China and Australia. China has lots of serious work to do than play with Australia over the long distance. Wasting money on some boats and sinkables? Why not? If you have lots to squander
💪💪
They have 🇺🇸 ships there 2 💪
Crux "Russia building up military power"
Mean while russia military is losing alot of armored vehicles and has a dysfunctional military. Btw crux why is it that in other videos I asked for the name of the song, but yet you never respond back. I subscribed and had many other friends of mine subscribe. So I did you a favor and how about you do me a favor and tell me the name of the songs when I ask. Thank you.
yeah yeah keep it going bro with that BS and then stfu when we come to your house )
OMG, look out now Aussie Aussie is going to have 20 row boats instead of just 10🤭😂?. Hopefully they can hold out 100 asylum seekers on rusty fishing trawlers & maybe patrol the shark nets more regularly now🤣?.
your country doesnt even have a navy 🤣
@@thepunisher3640 of coz we have, coast guard water police & Fisheries inspectors😂. The coast guard & water rats have very fast speed boats & the Fisheries inspectors watch the waters with big binoculars & arrest illegal small fish catchers 😂🤣, & anyone found swimming outside of the beach flags illegally will be seen with the new big spotlights on the Westpac Rescue Helicopter🤭🤣. This is new secret technology from our best friend USA, they said it's cutting edge, & not to tell anyone🤭🤣😂?. You are too much 😝, stop it!!.
🙏💪
Dito na kayo magpagawa ng barko sa pilipinas para magkaroon kami trabaho marami😂
Downg4ade brilliant frigate program but had to as Adelaide far to slow and incompetent, navy chiefs and public servents will totally stuff up the next batch and put them 10 years late and billions over budget and large unmanned surface ships dont exist yet in any navy. Money waste and cost blow out a given if Australian built, they will stuff up the next with same issues and the rest a dream. Labor government are predictable and useless.
We shouldn't be Puppets to no one
....but that will mean fewer shrimps on the bar-bee
They just don’t get it, ships are sitting ducks in the water!
Thats what they said about subs, lip service?😊
Relax , have a sandwich
CONVICT ISLAND WAS SETUP TO BE CONVICT ISLAND. GO FIGURE.
🙏🙏✍️
What a joke!
Would be nice to see China and Russiya build a baso on the Barrier Reef
These kenguru colonizators are no match to Russia )
so what do you want to call russia now?invader,land grabber or colonizer.choose your best answer.
@@leonillelapastora6706 saviour of humanity from degenerate colonizers!
@@azeritto100 or murderous genocidal animals
@@BettyBettyBoBetty u are a genociding killer )
@@azeritto100 is that english ?
Poseidon diplomacy fits perfectly for colonizers
Aussies should build more love boats without war and make the Kangaroo richest again.🥰💯