Underrated RUclipsr with great content. I only got to know about this channel because of the PH video. Keep up making these videos! they are honestly very entertaining and contain a good studies behind each subject explained and showcased in these video.
I don't know about nanotyranos, but I do know Pluto recently has found some new cousins outside the rims of the current solar system, possibly wanting to join the family at some point. Like all things, it'll be another few more decades before categories are reevaluated. I just to hope I live long enough to see the glorious day when Pluto is welcomes back into the family, no matter how small it is.
this one was great, I love to hear about how scientific findings have progressed and formed over the years based on what they've uncovered or put together.
There is no evidence of Nanotyrannus being a juvenile of Tyrannosaurus, besides it being small. You showed some of that evidence in the video yourself. Also, people underestimate just how many paleontologists and museums still support Nanotyrannus as its own thing.
apart from it being small, the skulls of various specimens have been found to not be fused, indicating it was likely a juvenile of some tyrannosaur. the tyrannosaurus connection mainly comes from both living at the same time in the same area, but you’re right that there’s still differences in morphology that still confuses the situation. it might still be separate from tyrannosaurus, which is why i don’t 100% say it is in the video, but as of now it’s what’s most likely.
@@empireonyt15 I also actually got to meet Robert Bakker in real life and had many conversations with him about it too. I used to be on the side of it being a juvenile Tyrannosaurus until I talked to Bakker and several other paleontologists about it.
@@empireonyt15 The first thing he brought was was the difference in hand morphology, but one other thing he brought up that killed any chance of me thinking it was a juvenile Tyrannosaurus was the fact their teeth look nothing alike, but other Tyrannosaurs have the same tooth shape and function threw out there lives.
@@The_PokeSaurus yea for me the arm morphology was the biggest piece of evidence against the tyrannosaurus connection for me, granted it’s possible that skeletal deformation could’ve occurred as the arm was fossilized but it’s just as likely that it wasn’t tbh
Underrated RUclipsr with great content. I only got to know about this channel because of the PH video.
Keep up making these videos! they are honestly very entertaining and contain a good studies behind each subject explained and showcased in these video.
Nick Saban would recruit Nano T. Lance and turn him into a 1st round T-Rex prospect
I don't know about nanotyranos, but I do know Pluto recently has found some new cousins outside the rims of the current solar system, possibly wanting to join the family at some point.
Like all things, it'll be another few more decades before categories are reevaluated. I just to hope I live long enough to see the glorious day when Pluto is welcomes back into the family, no matter how small it is.
this one was great, I love to hear about how scientific findings have progressed and formed over the years based on what they've uncovered or put together.
There is no evidence of Nanotyrannus being a juvenile of Tyrannosaurus, besides it being small. You showed some of that evidence in the video yourself. Also, people underestimate just how many paleontologists and museums still support Nanotyrannus as its own thing.
apart from it being small, the skulls of various specimens have been found to not be fused, indicating it was likely a juvenile of some tyrannosaur. the tyrannosaurus connection mainly comes from both living at the same time in the same area, but you’re right that there’s still differences in morphology that still confuses the situation. it might still be separate from tyrannosaurus, which is why i don’t 100% say it is in the video, but as of now it’s what’s most likely.
@@empireonyt15 I also actually got to meet Robert Bakker in real life and had many conversations with him about it too. I used to be on the side of it being a juvenile Tyrannosaurus until I talked to Bakker and several other paleontologists about it.
@@The_PokeSaurus shit thats cool, im curious on what he brought up
@@empireonyt15 The first thing he brought was was the difference in hand morphology, but one other thing he brought up that killed any chance of me thinking it was a juvenile Tyrannosaurus was the fact their teeth look nothing alike, but other Tyrannosaurs have the same tooth shape and function threw out there lives.
@@The_PokeSaurus yea for me the arm morphology was the biggest piece of evidence against the tyrannosaurus connection for me, granted it’s possible that skeletal deformation could’ve occurred as the arm was fossilized but it’s just as likely that it wasn’t tbh
False
True ... see it's easy to just contradict without any evidence at all .. dumbazz