Many thanks❤️❤ your channel is definitely underrated! As a foreign student studying US law, your videos are such a big help & amazing study resources!! Thank you again :)
Generally, rules can come from written laws (statutes, regulations, etc.) or from case synthesis (common law). In either scenario, you can break rules into sub-rules or elements. Does that help?
@@lawschoolplaybook yes that helps!! I am just confused a little on the sub rules. For example, an element of crim liability is a guilty mind. That would be the rule but then sub rule would be Penal Code 2.01 that says "no person shall purposely, knowingly, recklessly, negligently, xyz." Right?
@niikas22 It sounds like you might be reversing the rule and subrule. For example, the BIG rule for something like burglary might be "breaking and entering the dwelling of another at night with the intent to commit a felony therein." The elements, each of which would have its own subrule (or definition), might then be breaking | entering | dwelling of another | night | intent. Does that help? You are breaking down a big rule into smaller component parts to see if each is met, so intent is typically a smaller element (or one piece) of a bigger rule....
@@lawschoolplaybook OMGGG Yes!! that makes absolute sense!!! That is exactly what my crim law teacher was trying to demonstrate to the class on Monday and I was clueless. THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!!!
![Digital Circus Episode 4 [TRAILER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/abZtsmMUbJo/mqdefault.jpg)
this is very detailed and helpful, your channel is underrated I must say! thanks!
I am so glad it was helpful!
Thank you so much; this is gold!
Thank you very much! I feel more confident to use the concept!
Many thanks❤️❤ your channel is definitely underrated! As a foreign student studying US law, your videos are such a big help & amazing study resources!! Thank you again :)
This is great, thank you so much!
You are so welcome!
the rules would be considered the statutes with the elements needed to satisfy the statute?
Generally, rules can come from written laws (statutes, regulations, etc.) or from case synthesis (common law). In either scenario, you can break rules into sub-rules or elements. Does that help?
@@lawschoolplaybook yes that helps!! I am just confused a little on the sub rules. For example, an element of crim liability is a guilty mind. That would be the rule but then sub rule would be Penal Code 2.01 that says "no person shall purposely, knowingly, recklessly, negligently, xyz." Right?
@niikas22 It sounds like you might be reversing the rule and subrule. For example, the BIG rule for something like burglary might be "breaking and entering the dwelling of another at night with the intent to commit a felony therein." The elements, each of which would have its own subrule (or definition), might then be breaking | entering | dwelling of another | night | intent. Does that help? You are breaking down a big rule into smaller component parts to see if each is met, so intent is typically a smaller element (or one piece) of a bigger rule....
@@lawschoolplaybook OMGGG Yes!! that makes absolute sense!!! That is exactly what my crim law teacher was trying to demonstrate to the class on Monday and I was clueless. THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!!!
So glad it helped!! @@niikas22