I love how they analyze and talk about the positions and how he does everything not just baseline… good work rate… should do well. I don’t like his prep on his forehand though… starts too low… and he flings the left arm (the more important arm on the forehand) out too soon.
In videos about player from other countries, ITF always states the country the players represent in the description. I don't understand why not for the Russian players. They are not helping conflicting situation by omitting their home country.
hopefully he will be successful and enjoy it. it's not easy as it's you alone and you need the fire and mental toughness and to be a Wimbledon boys doubles champion is great step forward. Good Luck Yaroslav.
If he stands on the baseline he’s missing 75% of the game. And a 2hbh is inferior in every area. There should be no need to train someone at the baseline. Tennis is won inside the baseline otherwise all you are doing is hitting the way everyone else is hitting.
You seen modern tennis? And tennis is mainly won with the serve and return not even coming into the net… this isn’t the 90s and a 2hbh is way better than a 1 hander in almost every aspect except elegantness… why do you think 90% of modern players have a 2 hander?
@@taylorbrewer5852 that’s my point. The artificial rackets and strings are allowing for that power. It’s not produced through natural skill. The equipment is doing it for them. Spin power and control are all excelled today due to the rackets and strings. By NOT coming to the net you lose half the game. The HARD part is coming to the net. The east way is to stand on the baseline and let those rackets do the work. The 2hbh is used mainly because the player is not naturally gifted enough to perform a 1hbh. And the baseline play and 2hbh go hand in hand. Also the 2hbh is useless inside the baseline. A 2hbh cannot perform a half court volley, a net volley, a drop shot from the net and a 2hbh is limited in reach. And running backhand down the line can only excel with a stretching out 1hbh a 2hbh could never reach and it takes time to set up, point is over by then. A 2hbh is also popular with beginners as it’s easier to adjust to and easier to adapt. A 1hbh has at least a half arms length advantage when reaching for a ball on the backhand side. Your comments are without merit and frankly had no real thought In them. The women’s game needed a 2hbh to help them so it was adopted long ago but for the men it’s embarrassing. This is why so many so called pros today would not be pros if they had to use the 1hbh and a traditional small headed racket. Todays players are basically playing because of the adaption of the artificial large rackets and artificial strings. These are all facts. Case closed !!!! 👨⚖️
@@TimTheMusicManyeah bro, the 2hbh is so useless that even the greatest player of all time uses it. You are saying that players should switch to 1hbh because that's how tennis used to be played? Even tho it is harder to master, harder to time the shot, harder to control, harder to hit higher balls and requires more shoulder/upper body strenght. Idk man... if you want to win you do what works, not what used to work.
Good guy and good tennis player! Good luck for your further tennis career ❤!
Really love the way this coach ask him open questions and allow the player to think for themselves and critique themselves. 😊
Good player, good coach, but he will never stay with the coach after he goes pro… but maybe the coach already knows this, nothing wrong with that…
I love how they analyze and talk about the positions and how he does everything not just baseline… good work rate… should do well. I don’t like his prep on his forehand though… starts too low… and he flings the left arm (the more important arm on the forehand) out too soon.
Аххахахаха. Забавный парень
Thanks for posting. More of these behind the scenes training videos would be nice. Thanks.
who are you to demand things. you have no control. stop commenting
In videos about player from other countries, ITF always states the country the players represent in the description. I don't understand why not for the Russian players. They are not helping conflicting situation by omitting their home country.
hopefully he will be successful and enjoy it. it's not easy as it's you alone and you need the fire and mental toughness and to be a Wimbledon boys doubles champion is great step forward. Good Luck Yaroslav.
I love how childish he is despite being the Wimbledon Juniors Double Winner :)
Good luck to him. Let’s see if this transforms into adult consistency
Why does the British coach say Vamos to the Russian player like every other line
It's the Rafa Academy in Spain. You'll notice Rublev uses a far bit of Spanish as well.
Cringe af
now do the same video but with pacheco now
How to participate in an ITF jr. tournaments?
is that Karu from the other end?
More videos like this please ❤
the way this guy keeps saying vamos..... made me think its the player's name or something.
💗💗😍😍💕💕
Wow. How tall is he? Doesnt event look like jnr
apparently, 6'1" but def looks taller in the vid
6’5”
If i went to nadal academy id instantly be a pro
so go
@@bradleyjacovides994 I would but my parents would rather waste their money on things that aren't important
babolat's the mandatory racket there lol
@@vinny6_9 too many ppl use it
You can go anytime after paying fees. But you are not a pro until you make money from tennis.
If he stands on the baseline he’s missing 75% of the game. And a 2hbh is inferior in every area. There should be no need to train someone at the baseline. Tennis is won inside the baseline otherwise all you are doing is hitting the way everyone else is hitting.
lol maybe in the 1990s
the modern game is played mostly at the baseline, if it was older tennis yes, but these days its all power and spin.
You seen modern tennis? And tennis is mainly won with the serve and return not even coming into the net… this isn’t the 90s and a 2hbh is way better than a 1 hander in almost every aspect except elegantness… why do you think 90% of modern players have a 2 hander?
@@taylorbrewer5852 that’s my point. The artificial rackets and strings are allowing for that power. It’s not produced through natural skill. The equipment is doing it for them. Spin power and control are all excelled today due to the rackets and strings. By NOT coming to the net you lose half the game. The HARD part is coming to the net. The east way is to stand on the baseline and let those rackets do the work. The 2hbh is used mainly because the player is not naturally gifted enough to perform a 1hbh. And the baseline play and 2hbh go hand in hand. Also the 2hbh is useless inside the baseline. A 2hbh cannot perform a half court volley, a net volley, a drop shot from the net and a 2hbh is limited in reach. And running backhand down the line can only excel with a stretching out 1hbh a 2hbh could never reach and it takes time to set up, point is over by then. A 2hbh is also popular with beginners as it’s easier to adjust to and easier to adapt. A 1hbh has at least a half arms length advantage when reaching for a ball on the backhand side.
Your comments are without merit and frankly had no real thought In them. The women’s game needed a 2hbh to help them so it was adopted long ago but for the men it’s embarrassing. This is why so many so called pros today would not be pros if they had to use the 1hbh and a traditional small headed racket. Todays players are basically playing because of the adaption of the artificial large rackets and artificial strings. These are all facts. Case closed !!!! 👨⚖️
@@TimTheMusicManyeah bro, the 2hbh is so useless that even the greatest player of all time uses it. You are saying that players should switch to 1hbh because that's how tennis used to be played? Even tho it is harder to master, harder to time the shot, harder to control, harder to hit higher balls and requires more shoulder/upper body strenght. Idk man... if you want to win you do what works, not what used to work.