The more I watch this game, the more it looks like Lion King with Pinocchio characters. Graphics - SNES by a hair in some parts, Genesis by a hair in some parts Music - I actually prefer the Genesis and it's nice deep bass Play - Since I'm not playing, but it looks like the Genesis controls better Overall - I wouldn't care which version I was playing.
Piece of jewel!!!! My first choice would be the Sega Genesis version. Those of us who know programming know and are very clear about the following: 1) the genesis had twice the processing power capacity of the snes. It is very fast and never slows down. It makes the game much smoother and more enjoyable to play 2) the famous mode 7 of the snes and the 3d rotations, the genesis could do them without the need for special chips for that, and that is clearly demonstrated in many games of the time. 3) By the processor could achieve much more moving wallpapers and Sprites on screen etc... 4) as everyone mistakenly believes, the genesis did not have a simultaneous color limitation and its available color palette was not 512, in fact that was the base and more colors came out of it, reaching almost 2,000 available colors, and about 200 simultaneously colors in moving images. 5) the famous transparencies of the snes genesis could be achieved without any problem with the light and shadow technique and had two other techniques to achieve it, dithering and by frames. 6) the sound of the genesis is much clearer because it does not use samples, but instead generates the audio itself with an internal instrument it has, and generates it in real time and could also play samples such as voices in a completely clear way, being able to achieve not only one but three channels of samples for it sounding at the same time. The quality depended on the quality of the sample that was introduced, that it was more or less compressed. But it did not depend on the machine. 7) While the snes only worked with samples and for that reason they were totally compressed samples and they sounded very bad, to save space. That's why most games sound very muddy and sound like they're inside a box or behind a wall. To understand it better, it was as if it had an internally compressed MP3 player, but it did not generate its own sound as the Sega Genesis did. I only know of very few games that have good sound. The only positive thing that the snes has in terms of sound is that it had a special internal system to achieve reverb and delay, so they could achieve a little more depth in the sound. Although the genesis also had techniques to achieve it but it was more complicated, that's why the sound of the genesis sounds drier to us, but that is easily solved by taking the audio from the genesis to a reproduction equipment and adding that delay or reverb effect of external way and problem solved. 8) the aesthetic appearance of the Sega genesis is incredible, classic and elegant while the aesthetic appearance of the snes is actually horrible, it looks like a cart, only the wheels are missing. 9) a higher screen resolution, the snes is seen with less resolution and more blurry, not sharp 10) the only advantage of the snes over the sega genesis is that it is much easier to program for it and many things could be achieved more easily. That is why I see the Sega genesis as an exclusive console dedicated to only experienced programmers, the quality depended on the programmers and not on the machine, the snes is one more console of the trade, but even so the genesis broke the face of the snes in European territory by far. That's why I say that the snes would be my second option, and I'm not detracting from the fact that it also has incredible games. All the best
I would really like to sit here and put as much effort into sharing My humble opinion just as You did Your quite biased review in 10 points. But in (TL:DR) form; I would say that the main difference for Me would be as follows:- 1) Disney & Nintendo went very well together in the grand scheme of things. The look, the feel, and the animation translated nicely on the Super Nintendo/Famicom. 2) The layer scrolling of the carrousel @ 16:16 is a very big difference to Me. 3) The colours look softer, more balanced, and really beautiful to look at on the SNES version. Thank You,
@elgamerpirata5383No lo creo, si éste juego fuese el mejor del catálogo de MEGADRIVE y Super Nintendo estarías en lo cierto pero no es así y en esa época la máquina peor parada era la de Sega, Nintendo tenía monopolizado el mercado y con las prisas se portaba el juego base sin exprimir el hardware de MEGADRIVE, éste juego es mejor en Super Nintendo?, Si. Xenocrisis en Super Nintendo tiene 4 chip de apoyo para hacer un juego que en MEGADRIVE no necesita extras y aún así la versión de Super Nintendo es peor por la reducción de marco de pantalla y resolución inferior con un acabado gráfico aplastado, todo ello aderezado por chip de apoyos por qué de no tenerlos no podría hacerlo, el de MEGADRIVE es el juego base y tiene años, el de Super lo sacaron 4 años después. No se puede decir de mejor por un juego, existen muchos Port que son mejores en MEGADRIVE y por ése motivo me gusta éste canal, viendo tu canal Nintendo se puede ver que eres un fanboy acérrimo de Nintendo y fuera mejor o no, no lo aceptarías jamás, una perdida de tiempo intentar lidiar con gente que no tiene criterio.
@elgamerpirata5383 ruclips.net/video/MjfCLVgNBRM/видео.htmlfeature=shared Míralo por tí, Port malos de Super con marguen de mejora desperdiciados, el Xenocrisis es más nuevo y es un Port de cuatro años, los desarrolladores pusieron los chip adicionales por qué no lo puede hacer, en los 90 por citar un ejemplo y técnicamente uno de los mejores juegos Flasback tenía ralentizaciones y en los últimos niveles era decepcionante, Robocop VS Terminator también es muy inferior y muchísimos juegos más, la Neo Geo era más potente y está demostrado que cualquier juego era inferior, en cambio Super Nintendo no demuestra tal potencia suprema como dices, creo que tienes una falta de percepción y se llama ser Fanboy, además tu canal es 100x100 Nintendo.
@Purple Luigi except 99,99% snes games run in 256x224 pixels whereas 90% mega drive and mega-cd games run in 320x224 pixels ;) also mega drive has an interlaced mode that can display up to 320x480 pixels (used in sonic 2 versus mode for instance) overall the resolution is one of the major advantages that often gives the edge to mega drive versions over snes counterparts
@Joe the Third fake-hires на СНЕС использовался крайне редко. Разве что для UI, текста, или в очень редких играх с минималистичной графикой вроде изометрических гонок. На сеге, кстати, тоже множество игр используют режим 256х224 для экономии тайловой памяти.
Genesis running at 320x224 while SNES runs at the lower resolution of 256x224. I prefer the Genesis but the SNES is good too. I feel the Genesis always has better animation too. Also the just released 32x version seems to have a similar color palette as the SNES.
The aspect ratio is 4:3, does that mean that the Genesis version is compressed, and the SNES version is stretched out to fit the aspect ratio of the TV? Both resolutions seems to be odd, since it does not match the TV. Perhaps som CRT TV magic in order to smooth out the picture?
SNES has more background to see on some stages because of additional layers, but to my eyes, the Genesis version contains more detail overall, the shading is more pronounced on all the artwork and the higher resolution really shows too. Despite the inferior colour palette, the image seems to have more pop.
Seems weird to me that the Super NES box for this game has the "Only for Nintendo" logo when it was on the Genesis as well. It can't even really be a timed exclusive, if GameFAQs is correct in saying it came out in November 1996 on the Super NES and that the Genesis version also came out sometime in 1996. Also, I have always felt the "Only for Nintendo" logo should have been for first-party games or AAA games, and though the animation is good here, I don't think Pinocchio quite qualifies, and definitely not The Mask or Mohawk & Headphone Jack.
sega`s 1995 i think.. first of all - youtube and google discribe game as 1995. secondary - 1996 was to late for this game for MD, plus GameBoy Pinocchio came out in 95 too, and its port of this game... and third one - check date at 0:16. idk why wikipedia says its late 96, welp, its wikipedia... p.s mb "only for nintendo" mean - enhanced graphic? cus enhanced port for sega 32X was canceled..
I like how he background and foreground are both swaying in the underwater level on the SNES version, but in the Genesis it's just the background that's swaying.
In this game the version of Super Nintendo has more visual quality with movements in 3 planes on the screen while the version of Genesis has only 2 planes. But at 17:23 we see why Sonic was always faster than Mario. The Sega Genesis screens are more frenetic, turbinated. Genesis wins for gameplay. But both were very good.
That actually bothers me too since the Genesis can push way better parallax (go look at Thunderforce IV and the flying stage in Rocket Knight) scrolling than the SNES ever could and they didn't even bother in some stages in the Genesis version. :/
That's only your imagination. The blast processing campaign is one of the blatant marketing lie of the world. The work with sprites isn't in the cpus, it's about the graphic chips of each console, and the snes one is very superior to the genesis one. By the way, the 68000 isn't a fast cpu at all, it's decent one but no more, and around the same real speed of the snes cpu, because the very slow pace of executing instructions in the 68000, maybe because a more powerful instruction set or better interface to the memory could be a slighty difference favoring the cpu of genesis. But no so much. The reality is that the 65c816 is a very efficient cpu capable of doing the main group of its instruction set in less than a half of cycles that the equivalent group of the motorola chip. Hell, the Ricoh processor is able to doing basic ops with memory in only 3 cycles, when the 68000 needs around 7-8 cycles for the same. MHz, the great lie that the marketing departments use with the console fans. "Blast Processing", hahaha. Yeah, like the Atari ST, that has a faster 68.000 than the genesis as its heart, uh? XD So much nostalgia in the some markets with the Genesis, I see....
He's right though. The 68000 is faster in clock speed, but it needs 4 cycles to the same calculation that the 65c16 does in one cycle. So both chips are pretty comparable. The Mega Drive, however, has the advantage in the speed in between the chips, since it uses a 16 bit bus vs SNES's 8 Bit bus... on the other hand, the SNES has 8 DMA Channels with an HDMA option vs Mega Drive's single DMA channel without HDMA... So speed is actually a matter of how well the developer knows the machine.
Check again, the parallax of snes version has more planes in this scene, the difference is that the mega has the nearest planes of the parallax running faster, no more. So, it has worse parallax, and less background planes. By the way, in other stages is more of this, snes has extra background planes with new details as clouds, etc (running at different speeds, etc), and mega has that in the same plane that other objects or... nothing of these extra objects.
When pinocchio is at whale level you can see a lot the superiority of the sega genesis that intense red gave the sensation of being inside an animal ,The Snes with very badly picked color palettes that do not make you feel the same.
SNES has extra parallax layers but Mega Drive once again runs in higher AND better shaped resolution (320x224 pixels vs 256x224 for SNES meaning that in comparison, SNES has limited screen estate (20% less) and stretched graphics with wrong aspect ratio once displayed in 4:3 (since SNES resolution is 8:7 shaped)). Everything else is mostly subjective (color choices; music...). So I have to give it to the Mega Drive, again, since the higher resolution makes for a more pleasant visual and gameplay experience. Also for some reasons the SNES version has the spotlights that illuminate the wrong place here: 9:40.
Only Sega Fans will say Sega wins on everything. Their are some games that Sega wins and their are others where Nintendo wins. This game seems equally matched to me. A few minor differences hear and there for both systems, but they both look great. :)
@@tartuffethesprywonderdog5883 yeah platformers are always better on genny. I had the same problem when playing both earthworm Jim's for snes. I always came back to the genny despite all the better textures and colors on snes. Enemies can be very fast pacing and that extra viewing distance ahead helps a ton
@@inceptional i like the snes version better, because it has 3 spot lights, for all 3 on stage puppets. this game is just better on snes, cause the graphics and sound are better. same controls
well, you see more screen at once on the genesis version, so you'd have more time to react on the rollercoaster, and the monstro chase. but i'd still go with the snes version cause it looks and sounds better. both have the same solid controls. it's a good game
Still have to dig this one but yet I'd go with the 25% extra resolution of the Genesis version even though the SNES version has some nice added parallax.
I can't stand the lower resolution of the snes sometimes. That small extra distance ahead makes a difference when you need to dodge enemies in fast paced games. Especially 2d platformers
La version SNES a de meilleurs graphismes et un meilleur son. De plus il y a plusieurs petits détails en plus sur la version SNES ; comme au 1er niveau il y a des réverbères au premier plan, et des nuages dans le ciel La SNES a aussi plus de plans parallaxe, et plus de nuances de couleur. SNES WINS ! ! !
At least it's not on an Apple II. Despite it's high price tag Apple II had only 4 colors (if you can call them that). Black/White a shade of red and purple. It also had a beep and some kind of fart noise.
SNES wins this one - by far. More graphics in the background (clouds in the sky), an extra paralax layer in the foreground, way better use of colors ( a clean pastel color palette) and better music.
@@tartuffethesprywonderdog5883 This only matters if you really have to see more ahead of you for whatever reason, which isn't always necessary. Super Mario World and Yoshi's Island obliterate any platformer on the Genesis in pretty much every way, even with the Genesis slightly more widescreen view. But Sonic would be sooo bad on SNES, both due to the speed and also not being able to see as much ahead, which is already an issue on Genesis as is at that speed.
@@tartuffethesprywonderdog5883 "If you're a toddler", he says about one of thee greatest platform games of all time--here's a guy no one should listen to.
Both these versions and the Game Boy one must all be added to a new Disney Classic Games Collection like when that game gets another upgraded releases joining Aladdin, The Lion King, and The Jungle Book
The SNES mostly has better music (except for there being no cutscene music, and I like the Blue Fairy appearing theme better in the Mega Drive), but the Genesis has slightly better graphics to my eyes. Frankly though, I would have axed that puppet show level and added three extra Jiminy Cricket levels, one where he has to go to Stromboli's caravan, one where he's going across the wrecked carnage on Pleasure Island to warn Pinocchio about what happens to the boys, and one where he's in that bottle fighting off seagulls.
For me this game just suits the SNES better. More colours, simple tunes favour pcm sound. The slightly slower gameplay still suits the pace of the game. So SNES is a clear winner this time.
yep, it's true. i think virgin made those games specifically for the genesis, and just ported them to snes, so they usually were better on sega. but this one turned out better on snes
The Commodore games that were NOT ports could have up to 8 bit colors (before the NES!!) with 7 sprites moving at one time. For music a full range of tones with the SID STEREO CHIP you plugged in that had multiple channels. The only thing the NES chip did better was drums. The SID was a bit cheap on the drums department sounding more like gunshots.
Not sure why they only have the Game Over screen at the end of the SNES one. Not sure why they added it? I don't get why some games do that when you've beaten them properly.
vão até 4:10, o snes tem mais detalhes nos gráficos, tem um plano há mais do q no mega, o som é melhor e as cores tb, tem alguns efeitos mais bem detalhados, muito boa as duas versões, divertem da mesma forma e não tem uma diferença gritante, mas eu fico com a do snes!!!
@neogeomaster Well, I emphasize that I spoke from my own opinion. In my opinion, there are not many differences in the controls other than the controller itself (yep, the SNES has a bit more delay, but it never made a problem for me). Graphics-wise, I like the colors better on the SNES (smoother and more varied), better parallax scrolling and better backgrounds; even though the SEGA Genesis has higher resolution. About the sound, I definitely like the SNES a lot more. Both versions have the same content and are very enjoyable. So, I prefer the SNES version more. Still, his opinion is also respectable and worth noting.
You definitely see the SNES uses more colors, but what I never get is why so many SNES games including this one used such a bright palette. Even the shadowy parts look so bright, the backgrounds just lack contrast.
A lot of SNES games, while colorful, always look a bit overexposed. But that being said, I think the SNES edges out the Genesis here by a hair..I mean, a hair so thin that it can barely be seen, lol.
A versão Super Nintendo os gráfico parece um pouco embaçado e pouco travadinho a jogabilidade (Não chega atrapalhar e quase imperceptível) o do mega tem mais detalhes e a resolução é melhor, mas é estranho os gráficos das fases mas claras(dia) acho melhor no mega mas quando são mais escuros(noite) ela fica melhor no Super Nintendo, mas ambas as versão são excelentes recomendo jogar ambas as versões do Mega Drive e do Super Nintendo.
Sabe nem mentir. Logo na primeira fase jã percebe-se mais detalhes no Snes, como mais camada e telhados com cores diferentes da cor da casa, no Mega Drive é um mar de marrom. E é assim na maioria das fases o Snes com mais detalhes, Mega Drive com resolução maior e nem preciso dizer que você tá mentindo na cara dura sobre a jogabilidade "travadinha". Puxa saco de Mega Drive.
@@JonBR-622 Isso é uma Análise pessoal geral amigo se não concorda tudo bem o caso do detalhe do telhado eu acho que você está sem óculos porque o do Super Nintendo parece que está olhando num óculos de 4 graus ou mais de tão embaçado e pode ver no background das telha atrás que mal aparece direito o detalhe do telhado no Super Nintendo enquanto no Mega você ver a linhas da telha em detalhe nítidos e você acha que no Super que tem mais camadas há mano isso é brincadeira de nintendista e uma coisa que dou credito na versão do Super Nintendo são os postes de luz e aquela camada frontal que aparecem pela frente do personagem que não tem no Mega. E eu nao falei para jogar somente 1 das versões e sim as duas que sao excelentes como tu acha que estou puxando o saco do Mega Drive eu não sou um lambe saco da Nintendo e nem da Sega que acho que você é da Nintendo...que vergonha em pleno 2023 ainda vivendo a console Wars..aí minha nossa ninguém merece.
@@lightxtremo7848 Sim, dá para ver melhor os riscos, mas prefiro no Snes pq não é tudo amarronzado como no Mega, essa tonalidade marrom deixou essa fase sem vida. Ah, e o céu no Snes tem nuvens, no Mega não tem.
@@lightxtremo7848 O Super Nintendo tem uma camada a mais em vários cenários, no minuto 1:35 q você mesmo citou, e tem outras como: 6:06 fundo além de ser mais detalhado no Snes ele tbm se move, no Mega é estático. 15:45 Mas una vez o Snes com uma camada de movimento a mais do que no Mega. 20:55 a água no Snes tem movimento, no Mega é estática. 35:15 mais uma camada no Snes e muito mais detalhado que no Mega.
@@JonBR-622 Exatamente eu concordo com você esses detalhes tem no Super Nintendo e não tem no Mega e principalmente aquela fase noturno do grilo no Mega é azulado e pixelado é muito escuro no background no Super Nintendo é muito mais definindo e mais clarinha e viva o estranho é que na fase do penhasco 20:59 a versão do Super a fase é escura no background e no mega é mais clarinha fora a agua que no Mega não se movimenta e no Super Nintendo tem esse paralax como vc falou e também em 28:49 aparece a animação do gato fugindo da baleia na versão do Mega eu não vi no Super Nintendo eu não sei se tem realmente e também se você olha na fase do teatro de marionetes 9:39 é estranho que a versão do Super Nintendo a luz do holofote fica na parede fora de foco no personagem enquanto no Mega fica bem em cima do Pinocchio que seria o certo e na ultima fase 34:37 o céu no mega Drive so é uma cor simples sem nuvens mas no super está mais definido com nuvens e com montanhas na frente ao fundo enquanto no mega so tem uma animação de montanha , porém na água no Mega tem 3 camadas de paralax na água que se movimenta dando mais realidade de velocidade a primeira debaixo é bem rápido a segunda é mediana enquanto a terceira no fundo e lenta e no Super Nintendo tem também três camadas de paralax na agua mas somente duas se movimentam e todas com a mesma velocidade mediana enquanto a terceira do fundo é fixa ou estatica não se movimenta e finalmente as musicas eu pessoalmente gostei de ambas as versões todas são agradáveis e tem seu estilo...realmente temos essas diferenças que da vantagem para ambas versões mas todas elas na minha opinião são boas.
I usually give the edge to the Mega Drive for graphics as it usually have a better resolution and animation but the added colour of the SNES really suits this game.
It looks like they basically just reskinned the Megadrive's Aladdin. Sales probably weren't outstanding at this stage as the PS1 was out.. and Pinnochio wasn't a new movie. The SNES might look more child friendly and have some more details but it also launched a year later and that Capcom-style salmon pink really gets old when you're actually playing. I'm just far more of a Megadrive fan - the exclusive games (plus the different version of Aladdin) are stunning. That European / American flair (and faster processor that the Megadrive had) in many of its games and its cool design.
Никто из вас может и не поймет, но... Я считаю лучшей версию для SMD, так как она более красивая нежели версия для SNES. У SNES может быть картинка лучше и музыка качественнее, но она какая то светлая. Нет. Были моменты, когда на SNES лучше, но это иногда, а не постоянно. Так что для меня SEGA - это отличный вариант для прохождения этой игры.
All games wore having better resolution on genesis as was having about 8mhz cpu and snes only 2.68 mhz cpu (on snes all games wore strached to fit tv screen therfore washout colors, here is a emulation and you can't see how awful snes truly was )
Almost all SNES games are low resolution cause if it uses the hightest the games will suffer severe slowdown. At the end people say it has bigger sprites, but its cause a low resolution ans stretched to fill the screen. I dont like the games shows a small part of the stages.
@@iulianispas8634 Bullshit from Sega fanboys. The colors looks washed out because of the pallette, not because of the resolution, you absolute dumbfuck. Sega fan boys make up excuses for their shitty pallette
@@xenobytek9583 Wrong. The reason high res mode(mode 5) was never used,because it cut down the pallette down to 64, and the available sprites as well. The snes manages larger sprites, in terms of pixel count, however, it tends to slow down at times, considering how poorly understood its ricoh cpu wad
Even Playstation 2D games ran at 256x224. But, the limitation was VRAM. If you want a lot of colors onscreen, you have to hold back resolution. Since Sega could only produce 64 onscreen, where as the SNES did 256, something has to give. That being said, this is one of the few Disney games that looks really good on SNES, and doesn't have that stretched look.
very close just a minor difference but most of us just need 1 not both i,ll get the sega version because of a slight better resolution and i like the pump up music better!!
![[TAS] [Obsoleted] Genesis Disney's Pinocchio by Archanfel in 10:09.13](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/A74CxFV5Tg0/mqdefault.jpg)
I never knew a Pinocchio game was made. And it even follows the movie 100%.
Very nice.
I wish in the movie the couchman fell of clift
The more I watch this game, the more it looks like Lion King with Pinocchio characters.
Graphics - SNES by a hair in some parts, Genesis by a hair in some parts
Music - I actually prefer the Genesis and it's nice deep bass
Play - Since I'm not playing, but it looks like the Genesis controls better
Overall - I wouldn't care which version I was playing.
I enjoy that you not only compare the visuals but the audio as well. Bravo!
Piece of jewel!!!!
My first choice would be the Sega Genesis version.
Those of us who know programming know and are very clear about the following:
1) the genesis had twice the processing power capacity of the snes.
It is very fast and never slows down.
It makes the game much smoother and more enjoyable to play
2) the famous mode 7 of the snes and the 3d rotations, the genesis could do them without the need for special chips for that, and that is clearly demonstrated in many games of the time.
3) By the processor could achieve much more moving wallpapers and Sprites on screen etc...
4) as everyone mistakenly believes, the genesis did not have a simultaneous color limitation and its available color palette was not 512, in fact that was the base and more colors came out of it, reaching almost 2,000 available colors, and about 200 simultaneously colors in moving images.
5) the famous transparencies of the snes genesis could be achieved without any problem with the light and shadow technique and had two other techniques to achieve it, dithering and by frames.
6) the sound of the genesis is much clearer because it does not use samples, but instead generates the audio itself with an internal instrument it has, and generates it in real time and could also play samples such as voices in a completely clear way, being able to achieve not only one but three channels of samples for it sounding at the same time.
The quality depended on the quality of the sample that was introduced, that it was more or less compressed.
But it did not depend on the machine.
7) While the snes only worked with samples and for that reason they were totally compressed samples and they sounded very bad, to save space.
That's why most games sound very muddy and sound like they're inside a box or behind a wall.
To understand it better, it was as if it had an internally compressed MP3 player, but it did not generate its own sound as the Sega Genesis did.
I only know of very few games that have good sound.
The only positive thing that the snes has in terms of sound is that it had a special internal system to achieve reverb and delay, so they could achieve a little more depth in the sound.
Although the genesis also had techniques to achieve it but it was more complicated, that's why the sound of the genesis sounds drier to us, but that is easily solved by taking the audio from the genesis to a reproduction equipment and adding that delay or reverb effect of external way and problem solved.
8) the aesthetic appearance of the Sega genesis is incredible, classic and elegant while the aesthetic appearance of the snes is actually horrible, it looks like a cart, only the wheels are missing.
9) a higher screen resolution, the snes is seen with less resolution and more blurry, not sharp
10) the only advantage of the snes over the sega genesis is that it is much easier to program for it and many things could be achieved more easily.
That is why I see the Sega genesis as an exclusive console dedicated to only experienced programmers, the quality depended on the programmers and not on the machine, the snes is one more console of the trade, but even so the genesis broke the face of the snes in European territory by far.
That's why I say that the snes would be my second option, and I'm not detracting from the fact that it also has incredible games.
All the best
I would really like to sit here and put as much effort into sharing My humble opinion just as You did Your quite biased review in 10 points.
But in (TL:DR) form; I would say that the main difference for Me would be as follows:-
1) Disney & Nintendo went very well together in the grand scheme of things. The look, the feel, and the animation translated nicely on the Super Nintendo/Famicom.
2) The layer scrolling of the carrousel @ 16:16 is a very big difference to Me.
3) The colours look softer, more balanced, and really beautiful to look at on the SNES version.
Thank You,
Buena explicación, la experiencia en programación marca la diferencia.
Sea peor o mejor port, la Megadrive era mejor consola.
@elgamerpirata5383No lo creo, si éste juego fuese el mejor del catálogo de MEGADRIVE y Super Nintendo estarías en lo cierto pero no es así y en esa época la máquina peor parada era la de Sega, Nintendo tenía monopolizado el mercado y con las prisas se portaba el juego base sin exprimir el hardware de MEGADRIVE, éste juego es mejor en Super Nintendo?, Si.
Xenocrisis en Super Nintendo tiene 4 chip de apoyo para hacer un juego que en MEGADRIVE no necesita extras y aún así la versión de Super Nintendo es peor por la reducción de marco de pantalla y resolución inferior con un acabado gráfico aplastado, todo ello aderezado por chip de apoyos por qué de no tenerlos no podría hacerlo, el de MEGADRIVE es el juego base y tiene años, el de Super lo sacaron 4 años después.
No se puede decir de mejor por un juego, existen muchos Port que son mejores en MEGADRIVE y por ése motivo me gusta éste canal, viendo tu canal Nintendo se puede ver que eres un fanboy acérrimo de Nintendo y fuera mejor o no, no lo aceptarías jamás, una perdida de tiempo intentar lidiar con gente que no tiene criterio.
@elgamerpirata5383 ruclips.net/video/MjfCLVgNBRM/видео.htmlfeature=shared
Míralo por tí, Port malos de Super con marguen de mejora desperdiciados, el Xenocrisis es más nuevo y es un Port de cuatro años, los desarrolladores pusieron los chip adicionales por qué no lo puede hacer, en los 90 por citar un ejemplo y técnicamente uno de los mejores juegos Flasback tenía ralentizaciones y en los últimos niveles era decepcionante, Robocop VS Terminator también es muy inferior y muchísimos juegos más, la Neo Geo era más potente y está demostrado que cualquier juego era inferior, en cambio Super Nintendo no demuestra tal potencia suprema como dices, creo que tienes una falta de percepción y se llama ser Fanboy, además tu canal es 100x100 Nintendo.
wait a minute, you copy-paste the same message in all Genesis vs SNES comparisons? I already saw this
is the md putting out a bigger res on all these videos..
The MD has a higher resolution than the SNES.
@Purple Luigi except 99,99% snes games run in 256x224 pixels whereas 90% mega drive and mega-cd games run in 320x224 pixels ;)
also mega drive has an interlaced mode that can display up to 320x480 pixels (used in sonic 2 versus mode for instance)
overall the resolution is one of the major advantages that often gives the edge to mega drive versions over snes counterparts
@Joe the Third fake-hires на СНЕС использовался крайне редко. Разве что для UI, текста, или в очень редких играх с минималистичной графикой вроде изометрических гонок.
На сеге, кстати, тоже множество игр используют режим 256х224 для экономии тайловой памяти.
love the snes version but bought the genesis, because of the better resolution, and gameplay!
Every Disney game is better on sega
How is the gameplay better?
Genesis running at 320x224 while SNES runs at the lower resolution of 256x224. I prefer the Genesis but the SNES is good too. I feel the Genesis always has better animation too. Also the just released 32x version seems to have a similar color palette as the SNES.
The aspect ratio is 4:3, does that mean that the Genesis version is compressed, and the SNES version is stretched out to fit the aspect ratio of the TV? Both resolutions seems to be odd, since it does not match the TV. Perhaps som CRT TV magic in order to smooth out the picture?
@@include55 to be honest for the genesis i never noticed only the streetched image on the snes
SNES has more background to see on some stages because of additional layers, but to my eyes, the Genesis version contains more detail overall, the shading is more pronounced on all the artwork and the higher resolution really shows too.
Despite the inferior colour palette, the image seems to have more pop.
SNES music fits Pinnochio better, it actually feels like an old Disney film. Genesis sounds too Gamey.
When the developers are the same in both consoles, the reslults are very comparable.....
Yes
Seems weird to me that the Super NES box for this game has the "Only for Nintendo" logo when it was on the Genesis as well. It can't even really be a timed exclusive, if GameFAQs is correct in saying it came out in November 1996 on the Super NES and that the Genesis version also came out sometime in 1996. Also, I have always felt the "Only for Nintendo" logo should have been for first-party games or AAA games, and though the animation is good here, I don't think Pinocchio quite qualifies, and definitely not The Mask or Mohawk & Headphone Jack.
sega`s 1995 i think.. first of all - youtube and google discribe game as 1995. secondary - 1996 was to late for this game for MD, plus GameBoy Pinocchio came out in 95 too, and its port of this game... and third one - check date at 0:16. idk why wikipedia says its late 96, welp, its wikipedia...
p.s mb "only for nintendo" mean - enhanced graphic? cus enhanced port for sega 32X was canceled..
320x224 vs 256x224, that is the main difference
How have I never seen this game before? Visually, I like the look on Genesis better, but the sound is definitely better on SNES.
Solo ver la parte de la linterna, hay más detalles,color se ve la luna. La casa del fondo está mejor detallada en snes.
Cómo dices que Sega es mejor
I like how he background and foreground are both swaying in the underwater level on the SNES version, but in the Genesis it's just the background that's swaying.
2:44
*i like how the geese are kicking the shit out of the kid and Pinocchio just doesn’t care*
In this game the version of Super Nintendo has more visual quality with movements in 3 planes on the screen while the version of Genesis has only 2 planes. But at 17:23 we see why Sonic was always faster than Mario. The Sega Genesis screens are more frenetic, turbinated.
Genesis wins for gameplay. But both were very good.
That actually bothers me too since the Genesis can push way better parallax (go look at Thunderforce IV and the flying stage in Rocket Knight) scrolling than the SNES ever could and they didn't even bother in some stages in the Genesis version. :/
Yes, the Genesis version could be better, it sinned in the finish and you presented good examples.
That's only your imagination. The blast processing campaign is one of the blatant marketing lie of the world. The work with sprites isn't in the cpus, it's about the graphic chips of each console, and the snes one is very superior to the genesis one.
By the way, the 68000 isn't a fast cpu at all, it's decent one but no more, and around the same real speed of the snes cpu, because the very slow pace of executing instructions in the 68000, maybe because a more powerful instruction set or better interface to the memory could be a slighty difference favoring the cpu of genesis.
But no so much. The reality is that the 65c816 is a very efficient cpu capable of doing the main group of its instruction set in less than a half of cycles that the equivalent group of the motorola chip. Hell, the Ricoh processor is able to doing basic ops with memory in only 3 cycles, when the 68000 needs around 7-8 cycles for the same.
MHz, the great lie that the marketing departments use with the console fans. "Blast Processing", hahaha. Yeah, like the Atari ST, that has a faster 68.000 than the genesis as its heart, uh? XD
So much nostalgia in the some markets with the Genesis, I see....
@wwwendigo, your continuous Sega Genesis hate in all these video comments sections is truly pathetic.
He's right though. The 68000 is faster in clock speed, but it needs 4 cycles to the same calculation that the 65c16 does in one cycle. So both chips are pretty comparable. The Mega Drive, however, has the advantage in the speed in between the chips, since it uses a 16 bit bus vs SNES's 8 Bit bus... on the other hand, the SNES has 8 DMA Channels with an HDMA option vs Mega Drive's single DMA channel without HDMA... So speed is actually a matter of how well the developer knows the machine.
I away found the sega games easier to play because you get more picture so you can see whats coming back in the day I always did better on the version
SNES: more colors, better coloration, more parallax scroll layers
GEN/MD: wider horizontal resolution of 320 pixels (SNES: 256 pixels)
Genesis Version Released in 1995 to Economic Crisis (Hell)
SNES Version Released in 1996 to End of War (Heaven)
extra parallax on the SNES.
Check again, the parallax of snes version has more planes in this scene, the difference is that the mega has the nearest planes of the parallax running faster, no more. So, it has worse parallax, and less background planes.
By the way, in other stages is more of this, snes has extra background planes with new details as clouds, etc (running at different speeds, etc), and mega has that in the same plane that other objects or... nothing of these extra objects.
You can tell this probably was made either before or after Mickey Mania, since both versions are using the same engine for this.
you can tell it was also made before of after literally any game, lol
Console Wars should cover this game.
Yeah, that would be cool to see
They’re gonna do it real soon now!
When pinocchio is at whale level you can see a lot the superiority of the sega genesis that intense red gave the sensation of being inside an animal ,The Snes with very badly picked color palettes that do not make you feel the same.
SNES has extra parallax layers but Mega Drive once again runs in higher AND better shaped resolution (320x224 pixels vs 256x224 for SNES meaning that in comparison, SNES has limited screen estate (20% less) and stretched graphics with wrong aspect ratio once displayed in 4:3 (since SNES resolution is 8:7 shaped)). Everything else is mostly subjective (color choices; music...). So I have to give it to the Mega Drive, again, since the higher resolution makes for a more pleasant visual and gameplay experience. Also for some reasons the SNES version has the spotlights that illuminate the wrong place here: 9:40.
Only Sega Fans will say Sega wins on everything. Their are some games that Sega wins and their are others where Nintendo wins. This game seems equally matched to me. A few minor differences hear and there for both systems, but they both look great. :)
Look at how much more of the screen you can see on Sega. Sega always wins plaformers for this reason alone.
@@tartuffethesprywonderdog5883 yeah platformers are always better on genny.
I had the same problem when playing both earthworm Jim's for snes. I always came back to the genny despite all the better textures and colors on snes.
Enemies can be very fast pacing and that extra viewing distance ahead helps a ton
SNES хороша, но анимация прыжка деда, на последнем уровне....(
because nintendo fans don't say nintendo wins on everything? what is that one-sided comment of yours?
@@ryzmaker11 Hardly
As duas são ótimas, mais gostei mais da versão do mega!
The SNES version looks to be better graphically for the most part, especially that underwater level.
I find it even stranger you ignore the snes resolution here.
The stage area where your in front of an audience looks far better on Genesis.
@@camulodunon Mostly because they drew the spotlight in the correct place, and the backdrop bounces a little as it comes down
@@inceptional i like the snes version better, because it has 3 spot lights, for all 3 on stage puppets. this game is just better on snes, cause the graphics and sound are better. same controls
The snes game looks more appealing to me in every way but I would like to know how much does the lack of screen resolution affects the gameplay.
well, you see more screen at once on the genesis version, so you'd have more time to react on the rollercoaster, and the monstro chase. but i'd still go with the snes version cause it looks and sounds better. both have the same solid controls. it's a good game
Ambas versiones tienen lo suyo, yo solo jugue la version de snes pero las dos son muy buenas
Thanks for taking my advice.
Some scenarios reminds me, Aladdin and The Lion King.
I like how strong the audio and visuals are on the Genesis version overall.
Still have to dig this one but yet I'd go with the 25% extra resolution of the Genesis version even though the SNES version has some nice added parallax.
Okami GreyDream™
It's the same : parallax, layer, plane... What differs is sprites or background(s) layers for example.
+Parallax Craze And the brighter colours of the MegaDrive too
Sean DeRoss no no smart a$$. SEGA did what Nintendo should has done!, being sooo slow.
Parallax Craze And better sound effects on the SNES too.
@Lucas Molessani That is parallax. lol
zoombini mudball sound effects at 26:14
The genesis crush the snes like a piece of toilet paper
Genesis win over SNES one more time.
I can't stand the lower resolution of the snes sometimes. That small extra distance ahead makes a difference when you need to dodge enemies in fast paced games. Especially 2d platformers
yea i know it makes a big difference when you want to beat the game, which is the object of playing!!
Why genesis run at 16:9?
I never knew this hame was made, why wasn't it in the Disney Virgin collection?
La version SNES a de meilleurs graphismes et un meilleur son.
De plus il y a plusieurs petits détails en plus sur la version SNES ; comme au 1er niveau il y a des réverbères au premier plan, et des nuages dans le ciel
La SNES a aussi plus de plans parallaxe, et plus de nuances de couleur.
SNES WINS ! ! !
How many music of both games have.
TIE ^^
+Okami GreyDream™ acho que não, e sim pela Virgin.
VCDECIDE, porque a tela do snes é menor? Acho que o mega leva uma grande vantagem nesse sentido.
VCDECIDE amazing all two the versions
@@felipealexandrenascimentof1897 É típico de muitos jogos da megadrive serem um pouco mais escuros. E só ajustar um pouco a tv...
At least it's not on an Apple II. Despite it's high price tag Apple II had only 4 colors (if you can call them that). Black/White a shade of red and purple. It also had a beep and some kind of fart noise.
SNES wins this one - by far. More graphics in the background (clouds in the sky), an extra paralax layer in the foreground, way better use of colors ( a clean pastel color palette) and better music.
Look at how much more of the screen you can see on Sega. Sega always wins plaformers for this reason alone.
retropolis gaming
Snes version has more details like clouds and stars but Sega's use of colors is better, brighter.
@@tartuffethesprywonderdog5883 This only matters if you really have to see more ahead of you for whatever reason, which isn't always necessary. Super Mario World and Yoshi's Island obliterate any platformer on the Genesis in pretty much every way, even with the Genesis slightly more widescreen view. But Sonic would be sooo bad on SNES, both due to the speed and also not being able to see as much ahead, which is already an issue on Genesis as is at that speed.
Yoshi's Island? If you're a toddler, maybe.
@@tartuffethesprywonderdog5883 "If you're a toddler", he says about one of thee greatest platform games of all time--here's a guy no one should listen to.
Both these versions and the Game Boy one must all be added to a new Disney Classic Games Collection like when that game gets another upgraded releases joining Aladdin, The Lion King, and The Jungle Book
The SNES mostly has better music (except for there being no cutscene music, and I like the Blue Fairy appearing theme better in the Mega Drive), but the Genesis has slightly better graphics to my eyes. Frankly though, I would have axed that puppet show level and added three extra Jiminy Cricket levels, one where he has to go to Stromboli's caravan, one where he's going across the wrecked carnage on Pleasure Island to warn Pinocchio about what happens to the boys, and one where he's in that bottle fighting off seagulls.
For me this game just suits the SNES better. More colours, simple tunes favour pcm sound. The slightly slower gameplay still suits the pace of the game. So SNES is a clear winner this time.
For the first time ever, a Disney/Pixar game is better on the SNES then the Genesis!
yep, it's true. i think virgin made those games specifically for the genesis, and just ported them to snes, so they usually were better on sega. but this one turned out better on snes
snes version looks better. has more background layers., and color. better music/sound effects as well
The Commodore games that were NOT ports could have up to 8 bit colors (before the NES!!) with 7 sprites moving at one time. For music a full range of tones with the SID STEREO CHIP you plugged in that had multiple channels. The only thing the NES chip did better was drums. The SID was a bit cheap on the drums department sounding more like gunshots.
Licensed By Sega, Disney Presents, Licensed to Nintendo: Pinocchio
This for me is the apex of videogame graphics. Not Crysis, not Red Dead Redemption.
Not sure why they only have the Game Over screen at the end of the SNES one. Not sure why they added it? I don't get why some games do that when you've beaten them properly.
Because the game IS technically over.
Left looks much better. We have deeper colours on the left one while snes brightness is a tad too high
SNES wins, but coming after the Genesis version.
there is also a unreleased 32x version. Albeit only a few stages.
No, the 32X version is 100% complete and features all stages.
@@WeskerSega Is it? Thanks for letting me know :) I'll play it one day :)
vão até 4:10, o snes tem mais detalhes nos gráficos, tem um plano há mais do q no mega, o som é melhor e as cores tb, tem alguns efeitos mais bem detalhados, muito boa as duas versões, divertem da mesma forma e não tem uma diferença gritante, mas eu fico com a do snes!!!
Music mega drive much better , i like more the 8 bit game boy music in the Pinochio then the snes
Pinocchio: RUclips on Nintendo Plus
I like both versions of Pinocchio
pq no Snes a tela parece menor? nunca entendi isso!
-- sega genesis forever! with this game, the sound is so much better and the picture is much more vibrant.
I like more the SNES version :3
@neogeomaster Well, I emphasize that I spoke from my own opinion.
In my opinion, there are not many differences in the controls other than the controller itself (yep, the SNES has a bit more delay, but it never made a problem for me). Graphics-wise, I like the colors better on the SNES (smoother and more varied), better parallax scrolling and better backgrounds; even though the SEGA Genesis has higher resolution. About the sound, I definitely like the SNES a lot more. Both versions have the same content and are very enjoyable. So, I prefer the SNES version more.
Still, his opinion is also respectable and worth noting.
@@Leo-tf6eb snes version just looks better, and sounds better. controls are the same, and it controls just fine
You definitely see the SNES uses more colors, but what I never get is why so many SNES games including this one used such a bright palette. Even the shadowy parts look so bright, the backgrounds just lack contrast.
Yeh i don't understand that either. In a lot of these comparisons the SNES's blacks are just grey.
A lot of SNES games, while colorful, always look a bit overexposed. But that being said, I think the SNES edges out the Genesis here by a hair..I mean, a hair so thin that it can barely be seen, lol.
@@bondosho nah, it wins by a pretty big margin for more colors, and background layers
Snes wins this one, which is an exception Disney games.
Very close this one. To play the genesis version you might need to adjust the brightness of your display a bit. This is common for some Genesis games.
Parabéns!!!
SEGA wins on both graphics and sound. I love Nintendo and got almost all of its consoles but thank goodness I'm not a fanboy. :)
A versão Super Nintendo os gráfico parece um pouco embaçado e pouco travadinho a jogabilidade (Não chega atrapalhar e quase imperceptível) o do mega tem mais detalhes e a resolução é melhor, mas é estranho os gráficos das fases mas claras(dia) acho melhor no mega mas quando são mais escuros(noite) ela fica melhor no Super Nintendo, mas ambas as versão são excelentes recomendo jogar ambas as versões do Mega Drive e do Super Nintendo.
Sabe nem mentir. Logo na primeira fase jã percebe-se mais detalhes no Snes, como mais camada e telhados com cores diferentes da cor da casa, no Mega Drive é um mar de marrom. E é assim na maioria das fases o Snes com mais detalhes, Mega Drive com resolução maior e nem preciso dizer que você tá mentindo na cara dura sobre a jogabilidade "travadinha". Puxa saco de Mega Drive.
@@JonBR-622 Isso é uma Análise pessoal geral amigo se não concorda tudo bem o caso do detalhe do telhado eu acho que você está sem óculos porque o do Super Nintendo parece que está olhando num óculos de 4 graus ou mais de tão embaçado e pode ver no background das telha atrás que mal aparece direito o detalhe do telhado no Super Nintendo enquanto no Mega você ver a linhas da telha em detalhe nítidos e você acha que no Super que tem mais camadas há mano isso é brincadeira de nintendista e uma coisa que dou credito na versão do Super Nintendo são os postes de luz e aquela camada frontal que aparecem pela frente do personagem que não tem no Mega. E eu nao falei para jogar somente 1 das versões e sim as duas que sao excelentes como tu acha que estou puxando o saco do Mega Drive eu não sou um lambe saco da Nintendo e nem da Sega que acho que você é da Nintendo...que vergonha em pleno 2023 ainda vivendo a console Wars..aí minha nossa ninguém merece.
@@lightxtremo7848 Sim, dá para ver melhor os riscos, mas prefiro no Snes pq não é tudo amarronzado como no Mega, essa tonalidade marrom deixou essa fase sem vida. Ah, e o céu no Snes tem nuvens, no Mega não tem.
@@lightxtremo7848 O Super Nintendo tem uma camada a mais em vários cenários, no minuto 1:35 q você mesmo citou, e tem outras como: 6:06 fundo além de ser mais detalhado no Snes ele tbm se move, no Mega é estático. 15:45 Mas una vez o Snes com uma camada de movimento a mais do que no Mega. 20:55 a água no Snes tem movimento, no Mega é estática. 35:15 mais uma camada no Snes e muito mais detalhado que no Mega.
@@JonBR-622 Exatamente eu concordo com você esses detalhes tem no Super Nintendo e não tem no Mega e principalmente aquela fase noturno do grilo no Mega é azulado e pixelado é muito escuro no background no Super Nintendo é muito mais definindo e mais clarinha e viva o estranho é que na fase do penhasco 20:59 a versão do Super a fase é escura no background e no mega é mais clarinha fora a agua que no Mega não se movimenta e no Super Nintendo tem esse paralax como vc falou e também em 28:49 aparece a animação do gato fugindo da baleia na versão do Mega eu não vi no Super Nintendo eu não sei se tem realmente e também se você olha na fase do teatro de marionetes 9:39 é estranho que a versão do Super Nintendo a luz do holofote fica na parede fora de foco no personagem enquanto no Mega fica bem em cima do Pinocchio que seria o certo e na ultima fase 34:37 o céu no mega Drive so é uma cor simples sem nuvens mas no super está mais definido com nuvens e com montanhas na frente ao fundo enquanto no mega so tem uma animação de montanha , porém na água no Mega tem 3 camadas de paralax na água que se movimenta dando mais realidade de velocidade a primeira debaixo é bem rápido a segunda é mediana enquanto a terceira no fundo e lenta e no Super Nintendo tem também três camadas de paralax na agua mas somente duas se movimentam e todas com a mesma velocidade mediana enquanto a terceira do fundo é fixa ou estatica não se movimenta e finalmente as musicas eu pessoalmente gostei de ambas as versões todas são agradáveis e tem seu estilo...realmente temos essas diferenças que da vantagem para ambas versões mas todas elas na minha opinião são boas.
SNES looks and sounds better. Gameplay is similar.
I usually give the edge to the Mega Drive for graphics as it usually have a better resolution and animation but the added colour of the SNES really suits this game.
keep up the good work
In the Jimmy Cricket stage there is no moon in the Genesis version. SNES wins.
It looks like they basically just reskinned the Megadrive's Aladdin. Sales probably weren't outstanding at this stage as the PS1 was out.. and Pinnochio wasn't a new movie. The SNES might look more child friendly and have some more details but it also launched a year later and that Capcom-style salmon pink really gets old when you're actually playing. I'm just far more of a Megadrive fan - the exclusive games (plus the different version of Aladdin) are stunning. That European / American flair (and faster processor that the Megadrive had) in many of its games and its cool design.
Console Wars should do a review of this great game.
Graphics goes to Nintendo, sound to Sega.
No
@@RodriFerr1 Yes
I think it's the way other around...?
both go to nintendo
@@Rodzilla97 in your dreams.
Никто из вас может и не поймет, но...
Я считаю лучшей версию для SMD, так как она более красивая нежели версия для SNES.
У SNES может быть картинка лучше и музыка качественнее, но она какая то светлая. Нет. Были моменты, когда на SNES лучше, но это иногда, а не постоянно.
Так что для меня SEGA - это отличный вариант для прохождения этой игры.
Sega's better because it looks sharper
The coloring on the Sega Genesis version makes darker areas harder to see.
Super Nintendo. More colors. Smother scrolling. More parallax layers foreground & background. Better sound.
genesis best version
Sega Super!!!
Mega Drive/Genesis wins
SNES WINS!!!
how? lol
Probably by better color palette and music but not by resolution
If you just play the game in any format and not compare it to another it's just fine.
why the Disney games have a better resolution on sega Genesis than SNES
All games wore having better resolution on genesis as was having about 8mhz cpu and snes only 2.68 mhz cpu (on snes all games wore strached to fit tv screen therfore washout colors, here is a emulation and you can't see how awful snes truly was )
Almost all SNES games are low resolution cause if it uses the hightest the games will suffer severe slowdown. At the end people say it has bigger sprites, but its cause a low resolution ans stretched to fill the screen. I dont like the games shows a small part of the stages.
@@iulianispas8634 Bullshit from Sega fanboys. The colors looks washed out because of the pallette, not because of the resolution, you absolute dumbfuck. Sega fan boys make up excuses for their shitty pallette
@@xenobytek9583 Wrong. The reason high res mode(mode 5) was never used,because it cut down the pallette down to 64, and the available sprites as well. The snes manages larger sprites, in terms of pixel count, however, it tends to slow down at times, considering how poorly understood its ricoh cpu wad
Even Playstation 2D games ran at 256x224. But, the limitation was VRAM. If you want a lot of colors onscreen, you have to hold back resolution. Since Sega could only produce 64 onscreen, where as the SNES did 256, something has to give. That being said, this is one of the few Disney games that looks really good on SNES, and doesn't have that stretched look.
Yeah, uh...I love the Genesis but the SNES takes this one!!
Something's look better on SNES and something's look better on Genesis so it's a tie.
Beautiful
A EL LE CRECE LA NARIZ
I remember the movie of 1940
@James Bond 84 years old
Gosto dos dois mais na minha opinião a versão do mega ficou melhor
Monstro half whale 🐋 half octopus
Olhem a diferença de resolução de tela e jogabilidade, mega drive wins
Genesis verison is missing a lot of stuff and the animations plus color palette is a shame on the Genesis.
For me easy win for SEGA here!
Super muito superior em gráficos e sons!!!!
very close just a minor difference but most of us just need 1 not both i,ll get the sega version because of a slight better resolution and i like the pump up music better!!
SNES wins!! perfect !
VETERANO- GAMER35id ps3 mw3 not perfect
I don't care. It's a totally bias opinion but I love the way Sega sounds.