Gimmick also means 'making a fair game crooked. ' and only in that sense the Honble Judge might have used that word. It is quite shocking and condemnable. How can he use such a demeaning word against a senior advocate and also a Honble MP ? Even if he is not an MP the comment passed is unacceptable and condemnable. Sri Wilson has every right to point out that one of the Judges in the Bench had already delivered a judgement as a single member in that case under consideration, weather it is for or against. If he joins a two member Bench the case had already been half decided and he is not sitting to judge the case open minded. For all practical purposes it has become again single member bench. If the other judge changes his view now then what he had done earlier is the outcome of non application of mind. This leads to a piquant situation. Daily ' Mursoli 'also mentioned that judge had used an unsavory word ' you Guys '. When use of 'Ya Ya' is not taken kindly by the Honble SC how ' you Guys' can be a right word to use in Honble HC ? On both the counts the Honble Judge had failed to use Honble Court language or dignified language and is condemnable and Honble SC should take it up the matter and issue suitable order or instruction how the Honble Judges should set an example to others.
😂சந்திரசூட்டே பாஜக குரல் தானே
இந்தியா கிழக்கு இந்திய கம்பெனி வாயில் இருந்து தப்பி,இப்போ வட இந்திய கம்பெனிக்கு இரையாகுது.
Edu. Nada alladu
Comady peasa
PERIYARMASs❤
Quality of Mercy strained. Not complaining only pointing out. How it could cause unhappiness.
This episode only exposes the low standard of the persons appointed to the higher judiciary.
Vilsonai kathara kathara aditha Judge. Very Good action ?
Gimmick also means 'making a fair game crooked. ' and only in that sense the Honble Judge might have used that word. It is quite shocking and condemnable. How can he use such a demeaning word against a senior advocate and also a Honble MP ? Even if he is not an MP the comment passed is unacceptable and condemnable. Sri Wilson has every right to point out that one of the Judges in the Bench had already delivered a judgement as a single member in that case under consideration, weather it is for or against. If he joins a two member Bench the case had already been half decided and he is not sitting to judge the case open minded. For all practical purposes it has become again single member bench. If the other judge changes his view now then what he had done earlier is the outcome of non application of mind. This leads to a piquant situation. Daily ' Mursoli 'also mentioned that judge had used an unsavory word ' you Guys '. When use of 'Ya Ya' is not taken kindly by the Honble SC how ' you Guys' can be a right word to use in Honble HC ? On both the counts the Honble Judge had failed to use Honble Court language or dignified language and is condemnable and Honble SC should take it up the matter and issue suitable order or instruction how the Honble Judges should set an example to others.