This Lens RUINED EVERYTHING for me | RF 24-70 Review
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 сен 2024
- In todays video, I review the RF 24-70mm f/2.8 lens for Canon Mirrorless cameras. The RF 24-70mm f/2.8 is a incredible lens for your kit and i discuss everything i like about it from a photographer and videographer point of view. I also of course discuss what i do not like about the RF 24-70mm f/2.8 lens.
► Lume Cube Lights (what i use) - glnk.io/r516p/...
► Use my code MARCO15 for a discount at checkout on your Lume Cube gear! If you do purchase anything off my link, I do get a commission out of it. Help me get coffee!
► Commission link for gear I recommend - www.amazon.com...
► Follow me on my socials - solo.to/marcoa...
I have it's little brother, the 24-105 f/4, and it's just as versatile. Even at F4, it does well with portraits, especially at the longer end. And it's an amazing video performer just like the 24-70. And it's about $1000 cheaper. So if f/2.8 isn't a necessity (and for most people, I don't think it is), the 24-105 f/4L is a fine alternative.
Yep, I shoot with an L Series 24-105 and a 70-200. A 24-70 with that clarity and that 2.8 would be spectacular in low light situations. I shoot some long exposure stuff at night with my 70-200 just because of the f/2.8.
That was actually my first RF lens! I ended up selling it awhile back because i never used it and bought a Ricoh GR III for when i travel and explore cities. Sure miss that lens but it needed an owner that would actually use it.
@@marcoavaldez I just sold my zv-1 because I only use my r6 mark ii 😂
The F8 is even 300$ cheaper.
I love my 24-70 too, it is just so versatile. If I ever need to grab a single lens and run to get a job done it will almost always the 24-70. But, when it comes to the wow factor, my 85mm f 1.4 prime will always be my absolute favorite... unless I can afford the 1.2 version someday. It's just such a flattering focal range for portraits and other specific projects.
Kevin. You are absolutely correct about that wow factor. I have not had the pleasure of using the 85mm prime, but i get the same feeling with my 70-200. I bet those shots come out great on the 85!
Agreed. I have had the 85mm f1.2 and it’s a beast. I was able to sell it for what I bought it for though and found a really cheap Samsung 85mm f1.4 AF. Not gonna lie, aside from some vignetting. It provides a great wow factor for portraits
Years ago when I started doing weddings with Canon 6Ds, my first two lenses were the EF 24-70 2.8L II and the 70-200 f/2.8L II. And those two were very versatile! I now have 13 lenses, but my old 24-70 has been my most used lens! I’ve now moved the the same RF 24-70 and still a great (even better) lens!
The perfect combination is the 24-70 and 70-200 for sure!!!
oh well im using 2 a two lens combo rf28mm for wide and rf70-200 2.8 for everything else. And as you would expect I almost never used the rf 28mm as I use the 70-200 99.7% of the time.
I bought the 28 so I don't need to buy 24-70 2.8. Well, it kind of works for me but in tight space social gathering situations and group photos I am sometimes limited in my capabilities.
I had the EF 24-70 2.8 since i started photography on my 350D almost 20 years ago, but i never used it much especially for weddings. it was kind of a unloved backup lens to my primes.
however when i started filming with the R5C i bought the RF 24-70 2.8 mainly for its IS and to have a one lens does all solution. since then i really learned to like that lens for photography too. its tack sharp, handles and balances super nicely, has really fast and silent autofocus and when i dont want to bring two camera bodys with a wide/tele prime combo for smaller jobs or holidays i simply take the zoom. personally i dont need 24mm often, would gladly take a bit longer tele end and a bit more bokeh at ~35mm would also be lovely but overall its a very nice lens. i would trade it without hesitation for the tamron 35-150 though, but i dont think we will get that in the next few years on RF mount. shame on you canon.
Everything you said is spot on! Definitely love the lens and I am with you. I wish we had the option for third party lenses. It would be so much more affordable and more variety 😭
Oh how i wish the 24-105 f/2.8L was smaller and lighter!
And a bit cheaper 🥲
@@marcoavaldez yeah but if it wasnt so big I would love it as one lens to rule them all 😊and right now its big heavy AND expensive 😅
Happily rocking an EF 24-70 Sigma ART adapted for cheap , but the ideal RF lens is the new 24-105mm f/2.8
Really good video and I agree 100% on the versatility of a 24-70mm f2.8.
I shoot Sony so I recently picked up the new Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 Art II which goes for £1179/$1199. I really hope Canon users get 3rd party FF options someday.
I am hoping the same! Having third party options would be so great for my pockets. You have options with Sony.
I really want this lens as I don't own a zoom. I have a 35mm 1.4 and 85mm 1.8, the former rarely leaves my R6 body.
You would love it! I used to be all primes but then I got into zooms and they are so handy! I love just leaving my 24-70 on and not having to worry about much 🙏🏼
I might buy the Leica D-Lux 8. 24-75mm F1.7-2.8
Let me know if you do! I've always wanted a Leica and would love to hear your thoughts.
@@marcoavaldez I only bought an R6II six months ago. Maybe I'll buy the Leica in a few years' time. It's small and handy 😀
I need professional advice!
I’ve got the R6 Mark II with the following lenses;
RF 85mm F2/Macro
RF 35mm F1.8/Macro
RF 18mm - 150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM
I’m looking at selling them and getting one of these 2.
What do you think?
Which lens are you considering? What do you photograph the most? Portraits? Landscapes? Food?
@@marcoavaldez basically gastronomy, wine, vineyards and eventually people!
Not a photographer though!
The one I use the most it’s the 85mm..
@@Realwildshots for subjects like that, I really enjoy using my 100mm macro lens. It's sharp and can get you so close to your subject to capture details other lenses cant. You can also use the macro for portraits but I prefer around 50mm for portraits.
Dude are you in Colorado Springs? I recognized the wedding shot at Garden of the Gods!
@@davidmasseyphoto I wish! I love Colorado Springs. I am in Texas. Roughly 5 hours away so the trip is easy.
What focus ranges do you use your RF 70-200/2.8 L? Is the new RF 24-105/2.8 L a viable option, not considering price? Or do you need the longer focal range from 105mm to 200mm. EF used to have the 135/2 and 200/2.8 primes that I owned and used a lot. Take care.
I find myself more in the 125-150 range with my 70-200. The RF 24-105 f/2.8 was considered but that was an extra $1000 i didn't want to shell out. The 24-70 is honestly fine. I just love my 70-200 too much lol.
@@marcoavaldez I use both primes at 35/1.4, 50/1.2, 85/1.2, and 135/1.8, (also 100/2.8 macro) and the 15-35/2.8, 24-70/2.8, and 70-200/2.8 RF L trinity.
“The Workhorse” 🙌🏾
@@LuigiL75 you are right! It's definitely "The Workhorse" 💪🏻
Is there anywhere we can find what you are using in this video? (camera, lens, lighting etc.)
It's all in the description! I should probably make a video about my gear though 😅
What about this then?
CANON RF 24-105MM F2.8L IS USM Z
I considered that one for sure! I didn't go for it because of the price. I've also heard the sharpness isn't the best but I can't confirm since I've not used it. Even if it's not sharp, I'm sure it's still a solid lens that solves a lot of problems.
@@marcoavaldezI heard it's super sharp. Never seen anyone with it to use it though 😂
It would be a fun lens to use and we'd surely get a workout out of it 💪🏻
This lens feels geared toward video. That's the only real advantage I can think of for having a powered zoom.
@@marcoavaldezI have it and it’s not soft. I started using it for softball when I position myself by home-plate. It’s replaced my 24-70 f/2.8. The pics are great and the lens is very fast.
Sure is a nice lens... but if you use Sony you have the choice of the (very good/expensive) Sony 24-70/2.8, or the new Sigma 24-70, or theTamron 28-75, and the 35-150...!!
Plus you can extend the focal range with Sony's high Mpix bodies...!!
I'm a Canon user but I feel it is my duty to expose their (expensive) choice limitations. The more people that go to Sony, the better.
You are right about that. I love Canon but I'm not a fan of limiting the choices. Id gladly love an alternative for more competitive pricing and innovation.
i was about to say the 35-150 might be a better fit , but then i realized you're on an RF Mount
I sure am. I wish Canon would be quicker about more options and give third party the ok to make lenses. That would be great!
@@marcoavaldez theyrr opening it slowly, but i have the feeling the 35-150 wont be near ( itll kill their 2870f2 and 24105 2.8 sales )
Just get the RF 24-105 F2.8 and sell all your other lenses to finance it
Modern problems require modern solutions! You are right.
@@marcoavaldez I mean it is pretty expensive though 🫣
So it made you lazy, and now the quality of your wedding videos is compromised because you don't make the effort to achieve wide angles when needed and super telephoto shots when necessary.
I wouldn't say lazy. It made it easier and no. My wedding film didn't suffer because I got wide, medium, and telephoto shots in it. Plus I had my 2nd cam with the 70-200mm on a tripod as a backup.