I just showed this to my senior legal studies class. They loved every minute of it. We're currently studying Australian constitutional law, and I thought that it would be cool to expose them to a different system. Not going to lie, as a proud Australian I'm extremely envious of the freedoms that Americans are guaranteed. In Australia we don't even have a bill of rights in our constitution, just a smattering of protections with the rest of our rights being "implied" rights. Well done on a great production guys.
Any judge who wars against the Constitution of the United States of America is a trespasser of their office they commit perjury in violating their oaths of office.
WHY!? Why don't they teach this in skool?...Why isn't Civics taught anymore? I don't mind sharing I think I shed a tear or two during this video...I'm so damned proud of my country!
That’s because people have perverted our government to be something that it was never intended to be. They’ve eroded our constitutional rights over time. We need to carefully elect good leaders, who will follow the constitution, and not bad ones, who will use excuses and tug at your heartstrings and trick you into voting for people who will take away your rights
The Constitution doesn’t mean a thing if your too busy to take people to court for violations. The words themselves do nothing unless you fight for them.
Speach is absolute,you have the right to listen to what someone has to say,and you have the right to ignore what someone has to say so yes all speach is protected. The Constitution explicitly says freedom of speech,no where in the first amendment does it say forms of speech are prohibited.
15:58 What does 3rd Amendment, 4th Amendment and 5th Amendment have in common? Property Rights. Annotated: 3rd Amendment - "No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house (property), without the consent of the Owner (property rights), nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. A decent lawyer should be able to comprehend it spells out property rights. You have property rights, the house belongs to you, you can refuse to house soldiers. It's come into focus more as government and business intrudes on to private property, like HOAs and city ordinances. 4th Amendment - prohibits government (federal/state/local) from unreasonable search, and unreasonable seizure. Unreasonable search (invasion of privacy) of property, person and effects (belongs), meaning searches where there is no warrant and no evidence of a crime. Unreasonable seizure (theft by government) is not allowed, obviously because that would be theft (a crime). 5th Amendment - requires process of law (known as due process) in cases of death penalty, imprisonment or seizures. Due process of law is required to avoid government committing homicide (a crime). Government has the power to sentence a person to death (penalty), but must prove beyond a shadow of a doubt to avoid committing homicide (a crime). Being imprisoned without a good and lawful reason (false imprisonment) would be kidnapping (abduction, a crime). Seizure of property without proving a crime was committed would be theft by government, and it must be only in the amount as proscribed (written down) by law (per limitations of punishment 8th Amendment, known as protection from cruel and unusual punishment). A person's life, freedom, could also be considered in someways property of the person.
I posted a video titled the city of Bonham is violating the constitution in getting away with it one out of three and I posted three videosthen I did this because they are illegally taking people's cars using city ordinance if we can barely afford to pay bills and keep up our taxes feed ourselves how are we supposed to be paint the impound to get the car out every time they want to pick it up
There is no probable cause in the 4th amendment for law enforcement to search anyone or anything or seize anyone or anything, probable cause is only to get a search warrant, but the states and federal government illegally search people and their property and illegally seize people and their property.
17:40 - 9th and 10th Amendments 9th Amendment - "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." The word "certain" is used to mean "without doubt", certain. And not the certain (vague selection of). Google "certain people" (vague selection of). The enumerated rights in the Constitution (government powers) of established rights, shall not be interpreted to deny or deprecate rights retained by the people." As I tried to paraphrase, it says "enumerate rights in the Constitution" and not "enumerated rights in the Bill of Rights." Bill of Rights are attached to the Constitution (Constitutional rights), as Amendment laws (SIC). There are enumerated rights pertaining to what government can do. Either way, it works out to, "shall not deny or disparage others (other rights) retained by the people." Government powers shall not override the rights of the people. 10th Amendment - "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." States derive their powers from the 10th Amendment, "... are reserved to the states respectively" 19:20 "furthermore, at first the Bill of Rights only applied to actions by the federal government". The Bill of Rights applies to all levels of government (federal/state/local). "Prohibited by it to the States" maybe overlooked by some people. The Bill of Rights (protection from government powers, federal/state/local) prohibits unreasonable search and seizures, requires due process in cases of capital or infamous crimes, requires a fair trial, a legal representation (an attorney), for example. 19:48 "and with the state government were 'carrying a lot of the load of lawmaking'... ", "with the understanding the Bill of Rights didn't apply to their laws." Which should alert you to the attitude of some people who have very little understanding of the Bill of Rights. Protection from the Bill of Rights is for all levels of the government (federal/state/local), as it was instituted to protect the people from government overreach also known as tyranny or incompetent use of government powers. Madison, maybe overly credited with the Constitution. He only changed his mind (about the Bill of Rights), because he wanted to be part of the fledging government, after being removed (possibly for opposing the Bill of Rights and even stated he could not see a reason for it, initially).
15:20 When dealing with the 2nd Amendment, it's important to remember the context it was created... A newly formed government, in 1791, without a full-fledge military and also still fighting off the British, in skirmishes. "For the security of the state"... is proof it was for purposes of national defense. The Militia Act of 1792 was repealed in 1795 (revised to read repealed at the bottom), which basically removed support for the militia. Probably they felt the military was large enough to do the job of defending the nation ("provide common defense" : see Constitution Preamble). Active full-fledge military being in existence, the 2nd Amendment is basically a relic. You can still support the 2nd Amendment, however, by joining the army or national guard, to fulfill the "for the security of the state (nation)" text. The 2nd Amendment has been obsolete since 1795. It is not for personal gun ownership, but for national defense in 1791. Militia is an improvised army using armed civilians. A well-regulated militia is an organized and practiced militia. Closest thing to a well-regulated militia is the National Guard, a part-time military, where you do drills from time to time.
The Bill of Rights and Constitutional Rights are protections for citizens providing protections from the government. Throughout history when a government has absolute power and the population can't defend itself, tyrants emerge. This current administration is a perfect example. Democrats and the left have infected all corners of our government and media. This administration has become tyrannical ignoring the law and constantly trying to make unconstitutional laws and policies. Also the State National Guards are a state asset with the mission of protecting that state from the federal government, except DC which operates a little different.
13:00 James Madison - Contradictions He was for the Constitution (Federalist Paper Essays written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison), but initially against the Bill of Rights. James Madison and other supporters of the Constitution argued that a bill of rights wasn't necessary because - “the government can only exert the powers specified by the Constitution.” (google: James Madison against the bill of rights) (Not in the video) It appears James Madison flip-flopped to being against the Bill of Rights and ran for House of Representatives, under the promise of supporting the Bill of Rights, to win. A true politician. What you might not know, is the Bill of Rights (1689) existed in Britain, about a hundred years before the U.S. Bill of Rights (1791). It's ideas were brought over (Washington and many others poured over documents for ideas for a new government in the 1780s), especially those that involve fighting tyrannical use of government powers. Guess: He was probably pushed out for being against the Bill of Rights, and only supported it to get elected by promising to support it. Possibly, he even saw the need for it as he learned more about it.
very good information. Benjamin Franklin played a huge role also basically being a liason/ambassador for many years. One thing people don't fully understand is the original Colonies were more separate countries not states working as one. Europe was and still is set up like the Colonies. When I finally realized that it makes what George Washington accomplished even more amazing. Thanks for sharing your knowledge.
The bill of rights is a joke,the Justice Dept and law enforcement never abide by the bill of rights. I know this from experience all courts in America are a fraud.
7:42 "Structured around principles of popular sovereignty". Actually, it's structured around "Check and Balances" and "Separation of Powers", so that no one person has supreme power and all are accountable. That laws can be changed with in it's framework of equality ("popular sovereignty"). Very troubling. "Sovereign" is associated more with monarchy, not the U.S. Constitution or Democracy, where no one person has supreme control. Someone or some group of people may have altered the meaning of "sovereign" and "sovereignty" due to the use of the phrase "sovereign nation". Britain can claim to be a "sovereign nation", since it's a (constitutional) monarchy and involves a sovereign. The US broke away from Britain due to a sovereign or tyrant overtaxing the American colonies. sov·er·eign See definitions in: all royalty numismatics noun noun: sovereign; plural noun: sovereigns 1. a supreme ruler, especially a monarch. "the Emperor became the first Japanese sovereign to visit Britain" Signs of tampering with the definition by a right-winger. the authority of a state to govern itself or another state. (to govern itself or ANOTHER state) "national sovereignty" Similar: autonomy independence self-government Opposite: hegemony colonialism a self-governing state. It's not called the Confederate States of America, it is called United States of America. United States is an Independent Nation, not a literal sovereign nation.
The declaration of independence should be re written . I am not protected by the bill of rights. The 13 amendment states any man can be a slave . Black Americans was not free when the Bill of rights was written. I don't believe the bill of rights was made to protect all people..
They can keep climbing that ladder only if they have the money.only rich people get Justice in America. Justice Dept is all about money it's a fraudulent circus act.
26:20 Fake profile. 1st Amendment does not protect falsehoods, slander and liable. Enforcing dress code, would be a violation of 1st Amendment - Freedom of Expression. Adults get to get away with it, but kids not so much.
Wow James matterson was American Scottish so a Scots man gave people there rights in usa wow Americans don't know anything about Scotland lol its funny matterson a Scottish clan surname
![Twenty One Pilots - The Line (from Arcane Season 2) [Official Audio]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XCz7WUotXs8/mqdefault.jpg)
I just showed this to my senior legal studies class. They loved every minute of it. We're currently studying Australian constitutional law, and I thought that it would be cool to expose them to a different system. Not going to lie, as a proud Australian I'm extremely envious of the freedoms that Americans are guaranteed. In Australia we don't even have a bill of rights in our constitution, just a smattering of protections with the rest of our rights being "implied" rights. Well done on a great production guys.
The second amendment is supposed to be able to protect us from the tyrant governments.
Any judge who wars against the Constitution of the United States of America is a trespasser of their office they commit perjury in violating their oaths of office.
WHY!? Why don't they teach this in skool?...Why isn't Civics taught anymore? I don't mind sharing I think I shed a tear or two during this video...I'm so damned proud of my country!
I have no pride for America, America has become a fraudulent disgrace.
i hate school
same
we all do
LMFAO 😂😂😂 the government doesn't protect anything except their corruption.
That’s because people have perverted our government to be something that it was never intended to be. They’ve eroded our constitutional rights over time. We need to carefully elect good leaders, who will follow the constitution, and not bad ones, who will use excuses and tug at your heartstrings and trick you into voting for people who will take away your rights
The Constitution doesn’t mean a thing if your too busy to take people to court for violations. The words themselves do nothing unless you fight for them.
jesus christ what an eloquent speaker how do you do that
Speach is absolute,you have the right to listen to what someone has to say,and you have the right to ignore what someone has to say so yes all speach is protected.
The Constitution explicitly says freedom of speech,no where in the first amendment does it say forms of speech are prohibited.
Happy Bill of Rights Day people!
What Americans don't realize is they are the state, not politicians,law enforcement, judges or lawyers.
The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.
Good US History Lesson says Holistic Chef Barry Anderson
15:58 What does 3rd Amendment, 4th Amendment and 5th Amendment have in common? Property Rights.
Annotated: 3rd Amendment - "No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house (property), without the consent of the Owner (property rights), nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
A decent lawyer should be able to comprehend it spells out property rights. You have property rights, the house belongs to you, you can refuse to house soldiers. It's come into focus more as government and business intrudes on to private property, like HOAs and city ordinances.
4th Amendment - prohibits government (federal/state/local) from unreasonable search, and unreasonable seizure. Unreasonable search (invasion of privacy) of property, person and effects (belongs), meaning searches where there is no warrant and no evidence of a crime. Unreasonable seizure (theft by government) is not allowed, obviously because that would be theft (a crime).
5th Amendment - requires process of law (known as due process) in cases of death penalty, imprisonment or seizures. Due process of law is required to avoid government committing homicide (a crime). Government has the power to sentence a person to death (penalty), but must prove beyond a shadow of a doubt to avoid committing homicide (a crime). Being imprisoned without a good and lawful reason (false imprisonment) would be kidnapping (abduction, a crime). Seizure of property without proving a crime was committed would be theft by government, and it must be only in the amount as proscribed (written down) by law (per limitations of punishment 8th Amendment, known as protection from cruel and unusual punishment).
A person's life, freedom, could also be considered in someways property of the person.
Thank you. Very good video.
To protect them? You do know police dont care bout your rights right??
I posted a video titled the city of Bonham is violating the constitution in getting away with it one out of three and I posted three videosthen I did this because they are illegally taking people's cars using city ordinance if we can barely afford to pay bills and keep up our taxes feed ourselves how are we supposed to be paint the impound to get the car out every time they want to pick it up
Very well said.
there is noting more attractive than a beautiful woman talking about limited government
Conservative Women are very Beautiful.
She is not even a bit beautiful
@@rachelaoun2754 prettier than you i bet
Inalienable does not mean granted by Nature. It means granted by God. Look up the historical definition.
Nature was the original wording used by John Locke. They were used interchangeable, no reason to make a big deal about that
For some people nature is their god.
It's natural because rights are from birth.
Educate them on Patrick Henry
Feds tick me off!
The city of Bonham Texas is violating our constitutional rights and getting away with it
Force mandating school is unconstitutional.
How?
There is no probable cause in the 4th amendment for law enforcement to search anyone or anything or seize anyone or anything, probable cause is only to get a search warrant, but the states and federal government illegally search people and their property and illegally seize people and their property.
17:40 - 9th and 10th Amendments
9th Amendment - "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
The word "certain" is used to mean "without doubt", certain. And not the certain (vague selection of). Google "certain people" (vague selection of).
The enumerated rights in the Constitution (government powers) of established rights, shall not be interpreted to deny or deprecate rights retained by the people."
As I tried to paraphrase, it says "enumerate rights in the Constitution" and not "enumerated rights in the Bill of Rights." Bill of Rights are attached to the Constitution (Constitutional rights), as Amendment laws (SIC). There are enumerated rights pertaining to what government can do. Either way, it works out to, "shall not deny or disparage others (other rights) retained by the people."
Government powers shall not override the rights of the people.
10th Amendment - "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
States derive their powers from the 10th Amendment, "... are reserved to the states respectively"
19:20 "furthermore, at first the Bill of Rights only applied to actions by the federal government".
The Bill of Rights applies to all levels of government (federal/state/local).
"Prohibited by it to the States" maybe overlooked by some people. The Bill of Rights (protection from government powers, federal/state/local) prohibits unreasonable search and seizures, requires due process in cases of capital or infamous crimes, requires a fair trial, a legal representation (an attorney), for example.
19:48 "and with the state government were 'carrying a lot of the load of lawmaking'... ", "with the understanding the Bill of Rights didn't apply to their laws." Which should alert you to the attitude of some people who have very little understanding of the Bill of Rights.
Protection from the Bill of Rights is for all levels of the government (federal/state/local), as it was instituted to protect the people from government overreach also known as tyranny or incompetent use of government powers.
Madison, maybe overly credited with the Constitution. He only changed his mind (about the Bill of Rights), because he wanted to be part of the fledging government, after being removed (possibly for opposing the Bill of Rights and even stated he could not see a reason for it, initially).
Police are a standing army that violate the Constitution every day, they are state troops, they are tresspassers of their offices oath breakers.
15:20 When dealing with the 2nd Amendment, it's important to remember the context it was created... A newly formed government, in 1791, without a full-fledge military and also still fighting off the British, in skirmishes. "For the security of the state"... is proof it was for purposes of national defense.
The Militia Act of 1792 was repealed in 1795 (revised to read repealed at the bottom), which basically removed support for the militia. Probably they felt the military was large enough to do the job of defending the nation ("provide common defense" : see Constitution Preamble).
Active full-fledge military being in existence, the 2nd Amendment is basically a relic. You can still support the 2nd Amendment, however, by joining the army or national guard, to fulfill the "for the security of the state (nation)" text. The 2nd Amendment has been obsolete since 1795. It is not for personal gun ownership, but for national defense in 1791.
Militia is an improvised army using armed civilians. A well-regulated militia is an organized and practiced militia. Closest thing to a well-regulated militia is the National Guard, a part-time military, where you do drills from time to time.
The Bill of Rights and Constitutional Rights are protections for citizens providing protections from the government.
Throughout history when a government has absolute power and the population can't defend itself, tyrants emerge.
This current administration is a perfect example. Democrats and the left have infected all corners of our government and media. This administration has become tyrannical ignoring the law and constantly trying to make unconstitutional laws and policies.
Also the State National Guards are a state asset with the mission of protecting that state from the federal government, except DC which operates a little different.
13:00 James Madison - Contradictions
He was for the Constitution (Federalist Paper Essays written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison), but initially against the Bill of Rights.
James Madison and other supporters of the Constitution argued that a bill of rights wasn't necessary because - “the government can only exert the powers specified by the Constitution.”
(google: James Madison against the bill of rights)
(Not in the video) It appears James Madison flip-flopped to being against the Bill of Rights and ran for House of Representatives, under the promise of supporting the Bill of Rights, to win. A true politician.
What you might not know, is the Bill of Rights (1689) existed in Britain, about a hundred years before the U.S. Bill of Rights (1791). It's ideas were brought over (Washington and many others poured over documents for ideas for a new government in the 1780s), especially those that involve fighting tyrannical use of government powers.
Guess: He was probably pushed out for being against the Bill of Rights, and only supported it to get elected by promising to support it. Possibly, he even saw the need for it as he learned more about it.
very good information.
Benjamin Franklin played a huge role also basically being a liason/ambassador for many years.
One thing people don't fully understand is the original Colonies were more separate countries not states working as one.
Europe was and still is set up like the Colonies.
When I finally realized that it makes what George Washington accomplished even more amazing.
Thanks for sharing your knowledge.
I LIKE THIS
😄
Schools are nothing more than socialist communist brainwashing camps.
yo theyre free market brainwashers
👍
The bill of rights is a joke,the Justice Dept and law enforcement never abide by the bill of rights.
I know this from experience all courts in America are a fraud.
Damn wonder how you know, caught some cases hmm?
bruh now I gotta watch this dumb 32 min video just for like 5 questions
if you are using the public school system you are 14th amendment citizen.
7:42 "Structured around principles of popular sovereignty". Actually, it's structured around "Check and Balances" and "Separation of Powers", so that no one person has supreme power and all are accountable. That laws can be changed with in it's framework of equality ("popular sovereignty").
Very troubling. "Sovereign" is associated more with monarchy, not the U.S. Constitution or Democracy, where no one person has supreme control.
Someone or some group of people may have altered the meaning of "sovereign" and "sovereignty" due to the use of the phrase "sovereign nation". Britain can claim to be a "sovereign nation", since it's a (constitutional) monarchy and involves a sovereign. The US broke away from Britain due to a sovereign or tyrant overtaxing the American colonies.
sov·er·eign
See definitions in:
all
royalty
numismatics
noun
noun: sovereign; plural noun: sovereigns
1.
a supreme ruler, especially a monarch.
"the Emperor became the first Japanese sovereign to visit Britain"
Signs of tampering with the definition by a right-winger.
the authority of a state to govern itself or another state. (to govern itself or ANOTHER state)
"national sovereignty"
Similar:
autonomy
independence
self-government
Opposite:
hegemony
colonialism
a self-governing state.
It's not called the Confederate States of America, it is called United States of America. United States is an Independent Nation, not a literal sovereign nation.
The declaration of independence should be re written . I am not protected by the bill of rights. The 13 amendment states any man can be a slave . Black Americans was not free when the Bill of rights was written. I don't believe the bill of rights was made to protect all people..
Court corruption that's how it's solved.
Lexington and Concord came before the Declaration of Independence (not after). 4/19/1775.
Can the two girls be sued for defamation of character?
im board
They can keep climbing that ladder only if they have the money.only rich people get Justice in America. Justice Dept is all about money it's a fraudulent circus act.
ugh school
If you are poor you have no rights.
Quill pens
None of the bill of rights is enforced or upheld in America.
The government is a fraud,they are nothing but rich criminals imposing their will on the peasant slaves.
The supreme Court is a corporate fraud.
What’s her snap
LMFAO every law in America is a infringement of Americans rights.
3:28
Hall Anthony Lewis Jason Davis Sarah
26:20 Fake profile. 1st Amendment does not protect falsehoods, slander and liable. Enforcing dress code, would be a violation of 1st Amendment - Freedom of Expression. Adults get to get away with it, but kids not so much.
Is Harambe still funny
me me's
Wrong we have the right to say what the fk we want,you have the right to listen to what I have to say or ignore what the fk I have to say.
Wow James matterson was American Scottish so a Scots man gave people there rights in usa wow Americans don't know anything about Scotland lol its funny matterson a Scottish clan surname
lol
utter garbage
north arlington side and sWNortha/ Arlington side+=/33% //nd.D