I believe the question is not rigorous enough because it does not specify whether Albert, Bernard, and Cheryl receive the letters in order or randomly. 1. If the letters are given in order from the beginning, there is no solution to the problem. Albert may receive one of "c, h, m, t", but all the letters that follow these four are "a", so Bernard cannot determine the answer if he receives "a". 2. If the letters are given in reverse order, then the answer is "dim". Albert may receive one of "t, s, x, m", and Bernard may receive "a" or "i". However, "a" is not a unique letter, so he must have received "i" and Albert received "m". Finally, Cheryl receives "d". 3. If the letters are given randomly, then the answer is "has". Since Albert and Bernard can determine the answer, they must have received letters that appear only once, which are two out of "c, h, o, i, s, x". Among these six letters, "has" is the only combination with two unique letters, so Albert and Bernard each received "h" or "s", and Cheryl received "a".
I love that you took the time to think through this problem!! Thank you. I watched the answer video and the two clues are 1) the first kid answered immediately, which means there was only one answer 2) the second two kids answered after thinking a bit, which means they deduced the answer based on the first kid’s answer. I’ll find the link to the answer and post it later today.
It was interesting thanks. Although I probably give Bard 2, The only point I think he deserved was speed and time. Anyway after these GPT plugin features he is definitely destroyed. I hope you post a video about those too, have a nice day
@@matthew_berman No worries. Just that I heard Bing is also powered by GPT-4 and it's connected to the Internet. It just makes more sense to compare those 2 chatbot systems
@@solaawodiya7360 They will probably operate simiarly. I just got access to ChatGPT Plugins, which is incredible. I'm thinking about doing a video about that, what do you think?
@@dievas_ usually tl;dr or tl;dw is for the benefit of others, meaning you are summarizing the results of the video so they don’t have to watch. I figured that’s what you meant by “not even close”. Have a good day.
I think you weren't being fair in only giving GPT-4 a half point in programming. It completely wiped the floor compared to Bard
I kinda agree. I thought about that after I recorded/edited and you're right, it did wipe the floor, although it was far from usable code.
And he gave 1 point to bard just for having a year more information
@@kamaravichow yea if I were to do this again, I would clean up the rubric
I believe the question is not rigorous enough because it does not specify whether Albert, Bernard, and Cheryl receive the letters in order or randomly.
1. If the letters are given in order from the beginning, there is no solution to the problem. Albert may receive one of "c, h, m, t", but all the letters that follow these four are "a", so Bernard cannot determine the answer if he receives "a".
2. If the letters are given in reverse order, then the answer is "dim". Albert may receive one of "t, s, x, m", and Bernard may receive "a" or "i". However, "a" is not a unique letter, so he must have received "i" and Albert received "m". Finally, Cheryl receives "d".
3. If the letters are given randomly, then the answer is "has". Since Albert and Bernard can determine the answer, they must have received letters that appear only once, which are two out of "c, h, o, i, s, x". Among these six letters, "has" is the only combination with two unique letters, so Albert and Bernard each received "h" or "s", and Cheryl received "a".
I love that you took the time to think through this problem!! Thank you. I watched the answer video and the two clues are 1) the first kid answered immediately, which means there was only one answer 2) the second two kids answered after thinking a bit, which means they deduced the answer based on the first kid’s answer. I’ll find the link to the answer and post it later today.
Tell me you wrote bard without telling me you wrote bard 😅
Wrote bard?
It was interesting thanks. Although I probably give Bard 2, The only point I think he deserved was speed and time. Anyway after these GPT plugin features he is definitely destroyed. I hope you post a video about those too, have a nice day
Thanks. Yep I got access to ChatGPT plugins, going to try to get out a video today or tomorrow.
Nice review. Can you compare Bard with Bing AI?
Sure! Thanks for the comment.
@@matthew_berman No worries. Just that I heard Bing is also powered by GPT-4 and it's connected to the Internet. It just makes more sense to compare those 2 chatbot systems
@@solaawodiya7360 They will probably operate simiarly. I just got access to ChatGPT Plugins, which is incredible. I'm thinking about doing a video about that, what do you think?
@@matthew_berman Oh nice. I think that would be awesome. GPT-4 with pluggins would definitely be hot on steroids.
you seem to be trying very hard to make bard look good....
Not at all. I just ran the tests. I still think gpt is better. Appreciate the comment.
exacly
when chatgpt stops just type continue and it will continue
wow good video but bad conclusion
👍😯
:P
TL;DW - Not even close.
You obviously didn't watch the video ;P
@@matthew_berman TL;DW === too long. didn't watch. Congrats, genius.
@@dievas_ what does the “not even close” mean?
@@dievas_ usually tl;dr or tl;dw is for the benefit of others, meaning you are summarizing the results of the video so they don’t have to watch. I figured that’s what you meant by “not even close”. Have a good day.
@@matthew_berman bard is objectively worse at everything. If you got different conclusions, try again.