It's Time To Rethink How We Measure Cities. We Can't Afford Not To.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 июн 2024
- If this looks familiar, it just might be. This is a re-upload because of an error that needed to be fixed. See our community post if you want more details!
Join a local conversation in YOUR neighborhood www.strongtowns.org/local
Come to our National Gathering! www.strongtowns.org/national-...
More Articles: www.strongtowns.org
Merch: www.strongtowns.org/shop
Urban3: www.urbanthree.com/
Julian Price Project: julianpriceproject.com/
Presentation about how Asheville saved downtown: • Asheville in the 1980'...
Michael Kovacs article: www.strongtowns.org/journal/2...
We are huge fans of Urban3 and the work they do uncover municipal finances, helping cities become resilient and prosperous. I headed to Asheville to learn more about Value Per Acre and found a deeper story than I anticipated. Asheville has a beautiful story of reclaiming its downtown- not only creating a financially resilient and productive place to live, but finding a system that works and can be replicated by other cities willing to do the math and commit to making incremental changes.
About us: We seek to replace America’s post-war pattern of development, the Suburban Experiment, with a pattern of development that is financially strong and resilient. We advocate for cities of all sizes to be safe, livable, and inviting. We elevate local government to be the highest level of collaboration for people working together in a place, not merely the lowest level in a hierarchy of governments.
Historical footage courtesy of Rachel Price and the Julian Price Project
Historical Photos from Buncombe County Special Collections, Pack Memorial Public Library, Asheville, North Carolina
Donate to Strong Towns: www.strongtowns.org/membership
00:00 The guiding question
00:58 Intro to Value Per Acre
03:29 Show Me The Money
05:35 Implications
07:21 Asheville Saves Its Downtown
11:01 Why Am I Getting Emotional?
If you caught this one last week, yes, this is a re-upload- BUT WAIT! There's a fun announcement you definitely didn't get to see in the first version :)
I was so confused!
Wait, where? I'm confused!
@@MissMoontree At the very end, around 12:40
@@ajs1721 thank you
omg I thought I was going crazy
Value per acre also needs to be applied to streets and sidewalks. In a dense enough neighborhood the streets provide more traffic for local business when turned over to pedestrians and bikes. Often vehicles are only passing through and contribute nothing
Oh they do contribute.....to pollution. Exhaust emissions, rubber particles, metallic particles due to braking etc etc etc. They do contribute, just not in ANY GOOD WAY.
@@schenksteven1 Just shows why Oslo banned non-essential street parking and that solves both problems, traffic, and people showing up in cars to bike/walk
LOL 😄😂😂 you "educated" people Crack Me Up.
@@schenksteven1 Deliveries and handicapped parking are ok
@@schenksteven1 I'm sure everyone adapts differently, whether it's transit, biking, a mix of driving and transit, or just not going, but overall sales are up 10% at local retail businesses of those neighborhoods in which street parking was banned since Oslo made that one law change in 2017. That suggests the segment of the population who depended solely on driving to those neighborhoods to support local business either contributed insignificantly to the economy or adapted easily to the change. Keep in mind it happens on a neighborhood basis. Those neighborhoods with higher residential density are where the need is greater to eliminate street parking, and allow the residents out from the oppression of vehicle congestion. I realize there are other problems in U.S. like the white collar, 45 minute commute, but we're talking about cities with residents, not corporate campuses. My opinion is the U.S. problems are from a bubble created by government overreach, policy earmarks favoring specific corporations, lobbying, and trickle down, or top down funding initiatives throughout the economy. It's ironically a lack of ground-up capitalism that is hurting the U.S. as an actual place nowadays
I've had so many conversations with suburbanites where they become righteously indignant about the taxes they pay. But the subsidy they receive to make their lifestyle possible, is ENTIRELY invisible to them. I don't even blame them for being unable to see it. What do they know about how much roads and highways cost to upkeep? or pipes, pumps, water sanitation, electric, traffic lights, etc. If there was no subsidization of the suburbs, almost no one would choose to live in them, because the tax burden would be unbearable.
For real, suburbanites gotta be taxed properly
The problem is the way taxes are allocated. A big chunk goes to the Federal Government, and that kind of goes everywhere like the military. There is plenty of Federal money that goes into car centric infrastructure projects. From that, it seems legit, because Federal taxes are a huge part of my tax bill. Never mind that millions of people who live in the cities who don't directly drive on those highways are also paying a significant portion of it.
If the taxes were apportioned closer to home, and the expenses where assumed in the same way, then you would have a lot more careful thought on the spending.
The money that I make, I spend it carefully on me and my family. Money from the neighborhood is more carefully spent on taking care of that neighborhood.
We could probably have much lower taxes, fewer expensive infrastructure liabilities, more efficient use of land.
I admire how skillfully you augment Chuck's discussions by incorporating compelling visuals and storytelling elements. Your efforts truly set a high standard for creators.
I love these new style videos, as well as Chuck Marohn's full talks and speeches at events, where he can give a 90 minute presentation. It's a great combo.
The graphic visuals are from Urban3 and their research. I'd say Chuck Marohn is a very good 'storysteller' himself .
I love what he has to say like I lot, like i think its a top 5 issue for national thriving, but I hate his aesthitic and countenance so much. Hopefully im the outlier, cause I think it needs to be heard
Urban3 recently put out a good presentation on their study of Shreveport, LA. They show how much tax money comes in for infrastructure vs how much they’re able to spend on it and, long story short, the city gets another several million in the hole every year. Really sheds light on how counterproductive our development pattern is.
I learn that the reason Shreveport and the rest of Louisiana has such low tax revenue is that the oil industry bribed and bullied the state into awarding huge tax exemptions. If Louisiana had the ablity to tax the oil that follows thru that state and, shared that revenue with the people. Then Louisiana's citizens could been as rich as the citizsns of Dubia or Kuwait.
The politicians are bought and paid for. Very easy to understand. But the citizens are ignorant.....and keep voting for repubs because "muh god"....
@@Riorozen if it’s not their money, then why does the oil need to go through their land? Would you say the same about the gulf states? Should Louisiana not nationalize its oil industry?
@@Riorozen It's their land, land belongs to the people, and they should be able to tax people who use it.
I wonder how things like parks, playgrounds, urban gardens and public outdoor gyms factor in with this type of urban planning. as they have 0 revenue on their own (nor should they), but they do make for better more desirable neighborhoods.
They generate revenue in terms of how they increase the property value of surrounding homes and businesses
@@thedapperdolphin1590 oh makes sense. Thank you. Dunno why I didn't figure that out xD just kept on thinkin bout parkin lots and comparing them to places ppl wanted to go to and linger.
perhaps on top of making areas more desirable, and therefore valuable, a metric like amenities per whatever unit of area could be developed and standardized allowing for quick reference
@@zabacinjsh Plus, they can also be used by communities to set up activities and events. Our park has a bar during summer months and in summer you find a lot of people giving yoga sessions and dance classes etc.
@@electrosyzygy That method is used in a number of areas, principally that I can think of is Vancouver, BC. "Vancouverism" as it's called in particular prioritizes mixed-use high density construction (with a distinct albeit sometimes boring architectural style) with required amenity contributions from developers for virtually every form of development. Want to throw in a new modern condo building in BC? Okay, you have to dedicate public park space(s), mixed use commercial space, affordable or subsidized public housing, and/or other public amenities (or just donate a big chunk of cash to the city for them to use for public projects). It is inarguably the reason why Vancouver (downtown especially) is as livable as it is -- assuming you can afford the typical, extreme high costs of living in any metropolitan area.
When he said “we could build people centered places, that last longer than us and are designed to linger in and be enjoyed” I had to shed a tear and cry a bit cause it touched my hope for a better future 6:45
I'm loving this new approach in telling the story of Strong Towns and strong towns. Value per-acre (and taxes per-acre) has been a transformative metric for how I view places in my local area. Of course that metric alone doesn't tell the whole story, but certainly helps to equalize how we compare developments.
I live in Brooklyn, NY. We have a lot of old neighborhoods with shopping strips, apartments over the shops, and residential side streets around them. You can walk to shops and there are subways that can take you to Manhattan. Modern zoning often does not allow this kind of mixed use development.
This makes me think about population density and why we cover it so much on our channel. In a sense, density is another way of thinking about the productivity of land (that’s easier to calculate but not as precise, because it ignores non-residential uses). I think why we find density so interesting is that there are these large differences in "residential productivity" between different places (for example, a townhouse development having two or three times higher density than more spread out detached homes) that aren’t obvious until you actually run the numbers.
Hey guys! Love your visual guide for different categories of density, it’s a great introduction to show that density doesn’t have to be a box in the sky or a massive detached home. Hope Montreal is treating you well!
-Mike
Why should we choose? We can have both. It is possible, at least in theory, to adjust $ per land area to account for population density ($ per resident). For businesses we could use $ (taxes/revenue/sales) per employee.
How to take into account the increased mental stress, crime, pollution that comes with increased population density zones? Not to mention overall decreased quality of life of those living in such areas.
@@chrismcintosh2286 , I am unaware of any evidence in support of your claims. Average wealth is growing with the population density. Crime rate per capita is generally decreasing with population density. Environmental impact of dense urban living is lower per capita.
Please, consider reading “The Death and Life of Great American Cities” by Jane Jacobs.
Yes, why do we cover so much land? Could it be that people don't want to live in the way you want to live? Could it be that there if a value in not having people live overtop of stores (which could be dangerous or not child-friendly?) You are parochial in your perspective. I am libertarian in mine. I want people to live like THEY want to live, not how the Elite think everyone SHOULD live.
real estate evaluation is shrouded in mystery these days, hope we can start bringing back these common sense ways of looking at things back to reality
finally clicked on a strong towns video and i'm blown away. the quality is so high it's absurd. love it
I've been emailing my city council person and she basically said "we have the density for bike lanes downtown" so, the rest of us don't get them, and there's no chance they will seriously consider bikes as a transit choice we are allowed to have access to. I think I'll just have to run for city council. I'm grateful for this video because these principles appeal to fiscally conservative people (which my town is full of) and can help guide the conversation with data-driven, people centered solutions. I also want to get a little shed and set up a churro or soft serve place since I live on a corner and there are schools, parks, and lots of kids around. I think it would really liven up the neighborhood.
Run for local office. People that want to see change taking the initiative to make it happen is the only way it will happen.
@@makeart5070 You're right. I actually looked into how to do it last week.
Do you live in a snow fall area ? This could be a or the issue. Municipalities seem Very hesitant to invest in something that’s unused for mouths out of the year.
@@elaishh3533as someone from the northern edge of NY, right on the Canadian border; all of our towns have a municipal park in the center, in easy walking distance of restaurants and often having picnic tables. Just because something is covered in snow for 4 months and likely too cold to use for another 2 doesn't mean it won't be loved in the remaining 6. Additionally if you are willing to shovel and salt/sand your sidewalks then they are usable all year.
Cities need to learn that snow isn't an excuse, winter isn't an excuse, parks and sidewalks are mandatory.
@Kevin ..no, that's Theft.
“the trendy but now dying mall..” Hopefully this will happen with the current SUV craze too.
Brilliant speakers, brilliant channel 🙏
I doubt it. No other trend in automotive history has changed the way the automakers function the way crossovers have.
Minivans, retro cars, wagons, whatever never became so popular they they caused some brands to sell only crossovers. I mean it's so big it has Lamborghini, Rolls Royce, Ferrari etc chasing after it. And those sales keep the lights on and completely outsell everything else.
Toyota sales so many crossovers of various sizes and styles yet you won't see that with sedans and cars.
It might potentially cool off but I think it's here to stay.
I see it as a return to the orginal car styles of the early 1900s. Lifted up two box designs.
It wont unless congress changes the way it measures emissions.
The big SUV crazy is a result of congress enabling light trucks and SUV more emissions then cars. It's the same reason chevy trucks run outdated engines. This saves the auto manufacturers money on R&D and tech. So this is the vehicles that are pushed the hardest.
And given that the administration which is pushing electric cars not only maintained the exemption but made it even more rewarding for the auto industry to push larger vehicles it's not happening anytime soon.
@Phillip Banes You’re right. I love malls too 🫣
ironic...because malls are super super dense in business
It's already happening, so many of them are $40-50k plus, the majority of Americans can't afford that.
I’m living in Asheville right now! I’m so happy they stood up and saved their city center for us to enjoy in the modern day. Hopefully we can all keep heading in the right direction as a community! Great video
I hardly ever comment on YT videos, but was compelled to. Great content, exactly what our towns need
Found this channel through Not Just Bikes, and I'm so glad I did... Commenting for ENGAGEMENT!
Wow, this is very inspiring and informative!! I'm from Sri Lanka, and I'm working toward creating a platform for those who wants to improve cities and towns here. Sometimes it's very frustrating because not many people interested in this and very hard to get people to involve in this. But folks like those who were mentioned in this video inspire me to continue my work.
You're doing an amazing job, keep it up .
The analogy to cars and trucks is helpful, in part because it reminds us that efficiency is important but also not the only thing to be considering. Just like there are good reasons to be the less-than-most-effcient car in some cases, there are good reasons to built less-than-most-efficient land uses in some cases as well. The idea is not that every single development needs to be maximally efficient in and of itself, but that efficiency should be highlighted and prioritized.
I live in Asheville and this is bittersweet. Asheville is cute but its an amusement park you know?
Many service workers are sending 50% of their check to rent (or more). Thankfully there are new housing projects in progress but a couple hundred units will go fast when its so many that are housing insecure.
I appreciate you covering the concept of value per acre. Maybe that can promote the building of more housing (or at least the appropriation of taxes to even more housing)
Seeing all these places turn into what Portland uses to be makes me happy, and sad, at the same time. I miss my city. This channel inspires me to try and get more involved. To try and be a part of the solution
Well said! I was a municipal manager for about 5 years before the lightbulb went on for me, but once the realization came I could't unsee the mistaken approach to development we have been pursuing.
The idea that our cities at one point destroyed half of their heritage in the name of "urban renewal" is still crazy to me.
Even if it was a good idea. Why not build the new areas on empty land? Why did they have to bulldoze the city first??
Recently I've thought a lot of the Poletown plant built by GM in Detroit that cleared out an entire neighborhood. It was controversial but heavily promoted as a way to create jobs.
The place is still operational today and is now called Factory Zero.
But did it actually help reverse the city's decline and catalyze further growth and investment?
It would be interesting to compare that to a project today like the Joe Louis Greenway.
Great to have the hard numbers that "taxes per acre" provide when discussing with friends who are skeptical. Super valuable video. Thank you.
This. This was the single best video strong towns made. This is the one that made me UNDERSTAND. It's because of "value per acre".
Being from near Asheville, it is so tragic that it's almost unliveable now in the past few years because of the obscene traffic, largely single-family homes, and plans for even more highway widening. Transit like ART is almost nonexistent. If there was any kind of transit infrastructure at all then density could improve.
Value per acre, never thought about it, but sounds like a great measure.
Putting this in terms of economics makes good sense.
I'm a big fan of your videos. I live in a town in West Virginia, named Martinsburg, that is a former woolen mill town who's economy was devastated by NAFTA in the late'80s early '90s when most of its clothing industry shut down and moved overseas. Ten years ago, the historic downtown had a vacant, run-down feel. I'm happy to say that in the pat 10 years, the town's fortunes have turned around, and those vacant woolen mills are being refurbished into residential and commercial uses, people are taking an interest in the downtown again with people renovating historic structures and opening new businesses, and we are just this summer opening a 1.2 mile hiker--biker trail downtown, that runs on the right-of-way of a former rail spur, and there is a budding emphasis on everything associated with the concept of walkability in the downtown core area that I am hoping will continue to grow and bear fruit.
Keep on doing what you are doing - its definitely inspirational to see all of the creative ideas that you discuss on your platform.
I was starting to lean toward moving to Asheville when I graduate for bicycle engineering, and now I find out they’re actually trying to be a good place to live!?
Hell yeah!
I just cited this video in a course on strategic planning as an example of a focus on strategy (desired overall outcome) versus just ad-hoc planning. I'm obsessed with this video and keep coming back to it. thank you for making it!
That's the thing, the US is so big it barely considers land a finite resource
99% of Australia's population lives on the coast. The Australian continent is as large as mainland United States, but almost noone lives away from the coast. An abundance of land isn't the issue.
I will not eat the bugs and I will not live in the pods
More more more, just bring more of Strong Towns, the world must hear it! 👍💥💥
Ah, that romanticism, this is amazing.
Thank you
Your opening mindset led to the projects housing per acre
Production quality on these are killing it👏🏼👏🏼 love this format😀🧠
I visited Asheville from Charleston, SC. Asheville is shockingly expensive. The downtown area is nice, but its wider area is not pedestrian friendly and had little to no public transportation.
I would totally love to attend the gathering at the end of May.. but it's on a Tuesday and Wednesday, which is gonna need PTO that I don't have. Hope to catch the next one!
The problem isn't finding solutions. It's trying to get those solutions passed under a political system too often corrupted by monied interests that benefit from the chaos. Especially when the point is often chaos to undermine faith in the government to create division.
These solutions might be best for most people, but politicians typically choose the interests of their big money donors over the majority of their constituency.
Ayy Bloomington IL, represent!!! Just joined the Facebook for town. Can't wait to help build up my own strong town!
Asheville has a wonderful downtown. So glad they kept it
This is such an important piece of making more livable, sustainable, and equitable towns and cities. Thank you for sharing this!
Everything is about productivity and money now. Happiness is rarely a factor.
Not to mention the environmental issue. Use the space & resources to their best ability... Not size & consumption... A perfect example of what happens when Walmart leaves areas that destroyed local small business & sucked local revenue & resources... Zero accountability.
I’ve been entertaining the idea of. Owing to Asheville, and this has definitely helped with my decision.
Love the quality of the new content, guys. Reminds me about local (Vancouver) channel "About Here". As endearing as the old robot-voice animal character animation is, I'm also very happy to see ST content in video content that does the ideas justice.
Uytae is awesome!
All the sports references are flying over my head
Love Asheville! Great video Strong Towns
Would love to see stats for the Canadian cities / towns / neighbourhoods that have the highest value per acre!
Great description! Good work
Commenting for visibility, great video. More people need to be vocal to their cities about proper land use.
This was excellent. Thank you!
You can rent a big storage unit and put lay your stuff flat on the floor Or you can rent a smaller unit and get some shelves so you can stack your stuff and use up that airspace. Both will hold your stuff the same, but one is more expensive than the other, all else being equal.
love this so much!! I mean it hits close to home. ❤
When your land is cheap and abundant - you should be concerned about raising land value and taxes per area, however doing it too long will bring you another set of problems. At some point, it is worth considering taxes per capita.
As everything in economy, the impact of density on infrastructure costs is subject to the law of diminishing returns. If the density is too low even the most basic utilities would be cost prohibitive. Water, sewerage and electricity are taken for granted in most urban centers, but nobody expects it in every cabin in wilderness. Add little more density and you start seeing some forms of public transport. However, there is an opposite story unfolding as well. Although, the diameters of pipes and their costs do not grow significantly with the population density, construction costs do. Let`s compare two extremes. Green field development - we draw a line, and an excavator can start digging an open trench for those pipes. Now imagine similar pipes should be added in dense downtown - at best, we must block the road, mitigate alternative routes and some compensations, break and repair pavement, protect all other pipes and cables. In some instances, open excavation would not be possible at all, and we will have to use HDD or other similar techniques. Not to mention longer and more expensive permits. Higher population density requires more expensive structures, more complex engineering solutions just too provide services for all residents. Try to find a spot for new school, new hospital, new community center, fire depo in a dense city center - the land acquisition cost would be prohibitive in most cases. This is the reason why New York struggles to pay for the upkeep of the infrastructure.
Those are two different extremes . Most of American cities which went bankrupt were struggling from depopulation. The land was not expensive, and even if there were some affordability issues those were caused by low income and unemployment rather than high property values. On the other end of spectrum there are cities like New York, Toronto and Vancouver. Population is growing in such cities and the land is super expensive (more valuable than structures on top of it). Both types could have struggles with infrastructure - but those are different struggles.
Zoning could create an artificial land scarcity and density stacking will only exacerbate this problem. Towers will only further inflate land value, but Taxes per capita will be decreasing.
Now they are replacing few high paying individuals with a bunch of low paying ones - how long will it take to hurt your city budget?
Adjust your Breakdown of Revenue by Building Type to account for population density, no, of course, low density will not become profitable; but medium density would be more productive than high density (per capita).
Well done.
Land Value Tax
1 problem with the thumbnail is that we can't have independent buildings sharing walls anymore. Due to lateral motions from wind and seismic, as well as fire code requirments, most building codes require building separation. this varies by use case, building height, and location. I just bring this up to note that a modern, low-rise, development would look very different than the older buildings slapped next to each other. Its also why you sometimes see new apartment and mixed use buildings taking up a whole block
glad to see the video back online!
The Asheville "City Watch" is brilliant! I would love a publication in my area (Seattle) focusing on where in the city improvements could be made or opportunities are.
Tampa, FL is starting to do this correctly. They are building walkable mini-spaces like the new Mid-Town development. They took an old commercial block, levelled it, and then built a ring of apartment buildings with some shops in the middle. Problem is they built a bunch of really small apartments that cost about $1000 per sqft to buy. So nobody can really afford to live there.
How does value-per-acre account for “non-productive” buildings such as libraries, churches, parks, etc.?
There is value in multiple ways to parks and libraries. A neighbourhood with a park at the end of the street will have higher value, and thus tax revenue, than a neighbourhood without. Even a modest park, available by foot, has significant benefits to (mental, physical) health , which will lead to lower health care expenses. A park can play a role in, expensive, storm water management and will lower pollutans in an area . And to resident users they offer a free/low cost recreation which they otherwise had to make (transport or private market) costs for ...
Librariies employ people and offer a centre/network of knowledge and learning to a community which are also valuable ( and can be measured in a way ..) .
Churches build networks of comfort/consolation, trust and support. These networks are very valuable in any society, especially in an individualized society like today . Without social network support/access most people will not thrive in life. Isolation is killing.
Andres Duany was my introduction to New Urbanism and "Smart Growth", and Strong Towns is carrying all that wisdom and knowledge forward. Keep it going strong! 💪💪💥
Same back in 2008 but I later realized both NU and Sprawl are flawed
I'm a simple man. I see a Strong Towns video, I smash the like button.
Smash huh
Wow, this is superb content - keep it up!
This channel gives me hope
I'm loving these new videos and am so grateful for them. Well made and compelling!
I can send this (and others) to my city council members (and like minded neighbors!) in my smallish town Eureka, CA on the remote north coast of California. These make dollars and cents arguments that can change minds.
Eureka, like Asheville, lacked the finances to tear down their "blighted" old town to build a downtown mall across multiple city blocks. The idea of wrapping the whole footprint of the proposed mall was just brilliant! And now both our towns have character in our downtown cores that so many other cities don't.
We're well into the next step change, and working on infill projects to build mixed use and housing on parking lots downtown, but the opposition to this based on a completely imaginary loss of parking is breathtaking.
Your work makes our efforts to help our town be better and smarter so much easier. I've not seen such sensible content in bite-sized and easily defensible, shareable ways.
Thank you and please keep it up!
Would love Johnson City to get a hold of these conversations. Maybe we should start a group there ??
I think the biggest problem is the lack of education. If our whole community was better informed about how to increase quality of life AND value, maybe we could move away from car dependent communities
My family is from Asheville. They’ve lived there for nearly a century. My grandmother moved in the 60s to New Jersey but I’d love to go back and visit sometime.
Stellar work
H E N R Y G E O R G E
C O P E
Love the Moneyball reference at the end to wrap up the whole video. Big fan.
Yep, it's also so nice in those kind of places.
Very important information here
Cities don't own the land!
Woot, I'm from Bloomington/Normal Illinois!
I think you undervalue aesthetics. it's part of a high value, just only one part.
Will rewatch this just so stupid youtube doesn't think it's bad :D
I didn’t comment last week but I will this time - I LOVE that you all combined my two loves: baseball and planning haha. Great video!
Baseball sucks. I would rather watch polo or cricket.
Please read MoneyBall!!! You'll love all the connections.
Great video!
Saving to show EE and those like him.
pretty awesome to see this in Asheville!! the Charlotte Street townhomes project. I was really disappointed that they didn't go with a higher density plan. very silly that so many people came out to speak against it. It is downtown, let the downtown be a downtown
Asheville is a fantastic city. Recently visited Burlington, Vermont and it has a very similar vibe to Asheville. Both have a great sense of place. They're places you want to be and just spend time as a person. Take it all in. Not just a single destination to drive to and leave. Really wish more cities would get this right.
I feel lile when it comes to new buildings almost always its efficency over quality. efficency is important, but people deserve high quality enviroments with detail in the facades. this is what separates historic buildings from modern ones and within reason and budget i think the acknowledgement of this is overdue by all concerned in the making (and destruction) of our towns and cities.
This was a beautiful video! Everything from the storytelling to the visuals felt right and thought out. Keep up the good work!
the effects of the red scare are alive and well in the US
Watching from Germany here. Same issues here with dying smaller towns and car centric cities.
If anyone is doing something similar in Germany, or the European Union. Just post a comment under here :)
I've been trying for ages to think of how we can integrate some of the lessons here into my borough in London. We're very highly trafficked, being so close to the centre. We can't tunnel because geology makes it prohibitively expensive. We have appalling air quality and roads that were country paths 200 years ago are 2-3 lane "circulars" designed to shuttle traffic around London's peripheries. Our transport system is really quite good, although buses are caught with every other road user .. this comment is getting away from me!
Speaking of my own experience with German cities. I think it's the country I've seen the most of, including the UK where I live. It's just lovely in your country and I'm very jealous :)
But, you're suffering the same problem as every other city I've been to in the world - over the last century we designed for cars and lorries *even though* we had good public transport systems in place! So instead of a reasonably quiet walk from Reudnitz into central Leipzig, or Gürzenich into Düren, or through Kiel, Hamburg, Berlin (oh, you've got problems!!), Braunschweig, Würzburg, Dortmund, Essen (the forgotten place), Bielefeld (nothing but autobahn), Dresden - all with the same problems. Lots of us had rebuilding in the 1950s-1980s but we rebuilt badly.
I'll be interested to see if the rise in remote working allows people to leave the expensive cities and move back to the towns and villages - all over Europe. It doesn't so much in the UK where internet coverage can be very spotty, but if we can nail that then the only thing left is the desire.
Do you remember in 2010 with the volcano? There was no aircraft noise for two weeks. And 10 years later, there was almost no traffic noise for two weeks. Imagine if it were like that all the time (I say as I put my noise cancelling headphones back on).
Thank you for what this channel does!
11:58 And there we find us looking at Amsterdam. A wink to NJB?
The audio is very nice.
I used to live in Asheville
Was just there last month. Truly is a beauty
Property taxes are structured differently across the country. Where I live, for example, town-level taxes are about $3k/acre (or $4k per capita). It would be great to see examples of places that are already "doing it right" in terms of sustainable tax policy.
Land, water, sunlight, and air ..... not just land
Maximizing the "City's Return On Investment" one might think that maximum use density is the great ideal in planning. This may lead to the conclusion that mix use building should be planned where we have high density of apartments combined with small shops of varying businesses. But how many individuals and families would wish to live there? I have watched cities of every size expand their borders into suburban neighborhoods to collect more tax revenues and building fees for single family housing and now complain that their ROI is too low. Beware of using only one metric, remember, to a workman who only has a hammer for a tool everything looks like a nail.
great again
Great comparison at the 13:20 mark. To take this one step further, what about the difference in economic opportunities these two options provide? Not sure if there is a way to pull employer data related to this. Part of having a strong town is having good jobs.