It would help if they actually discussed what Ange spoke about: Newcastle - "handball" leading to equaliser. In their day, it would've been handball, likely without question but play on in 2025. Liverpool - Ange spoke about when advantage is played, they fouling player won't receive a yellow card (and being told this by officials). The fouling player would normally receive a card, regardless of advantage being played or not. 2 simple incidents yet unheard by the panel 🥱 Great stuff. 🙃 Lastly, Ange did talk about how well his team played, Bergvall, Gray etc after Bentancur's injury, and how good Liverpool are, although not to get carried away. It's only half time in the tie with a trip to Anfield to come. Good performance and result, albeit somewhat fortunate.
Sure, except the panel would rather discuss Ange's hypocrisy - it gets more views. Both Shaka and Craig were correct in calling it out from one game to the next, that's why they spent so much time on it. Talking about the facts of the game are kind of boring to most viewers who watched the game. Ange isn't acting in good faith here, he's trying to have a bit each way as we say here in Aussie land. I like Ange and hope he does well, but he is clearly feeling the pressure at the moment and using deflection tactics and talking out of both sides of his mouth. So much so that again the panel correctly pointed out the most cringey part of the presser where he was back tracking and trying to explain away what he said post Newcastle. It was so obvious to everyone that he felt emboldened by the really good result, but that's the time that he should stuff the ego back down and just keep quiet. Again, he's clearly feeling the pressure at the moment. Then he started going on some weird diatribe about being a lone warrior fighting the good fight for the good of the game. It's all very unnecessary and just guff, he's employed by Tottenham to coach and win, no one employed him to do whatever that is. Focus on making Tottenham better.
I’m with Ange regards these changes. The ref talking to the stadium explaining the decision reeked of American Football. What is next stoppages for ads during the game? Whilst VAR has been around for a while the CL use is less intrusive on the game compared to what’s happening in England. Video quality is not good enough yet as shown on still shots. We’ve had VAR here in Australia for decades in Cricket and Rugby League. It is still getting decisions wrong more than it gets right. I’m happy with the automated offside and goal line technology but until the video technology improves the VAR bunker should be moth balled for now.
Ange is a smart man he distracts the medias attention cause he knows even if his young players played well he doesn't want to influence the media attention on to them. He is protecting the young players from inflated egos and indirectly keeps them focused and humble.
@@CG-fx9bl It's Fergie 101. He's deflecting the attention off of the players AND he's got the commentators talking about ref decisions. Do this enough and all of a sudden the 50/50 decisions start going your way because the refs don't want the heat turned on them for the next week. Every manager tries to do this no doubt but some do it better then others and Fergie was the GOAT at it.
@@mkf628 🤣 let’s try again. The guy above says he’s protecting the players from developing inflated egos, when he’s more likely protecting his own fragile ego & inability to accept criticism, by focusing on every decision that goes against Spurs, instead of focusing on adapting to the opposition’s game plan.
I’d much rather hear the referees explain subjective decisions like why Bergvall was carded fouling Díaz but not carded fouling Tsmikas. Instead of referees explaining, like Craig correctly pointed out, objective decisions like offsides that are rubber stamping very black and white decisions once the lines are drawn.
Ya rules leave room for interpretation, if the ref feels that the foul was not overly aggressive, and plays advantage then he doesn’t go back and book a player for disrupting the transition which would normally be an automatic yellow. Subjective for sure but there is an argument that he was correct to not give a second yellow
This is the joke of VAR. It's made nothing better and it's only more confusing now. If VAR was a challenge system, Ange would have challenged the first one, as he did in the game. He saw there wasn't contact and it was a dive by Diaz. Slot would have challenged the second one and he'd have got his first yellow card and Bergval would have scored a legal goal. 🙂
The inconsistency is deliberate. So-called ''human error'' is almost never a factor with these highly trained professionals with monitors and replays available. Inconsistency deliberately allows manipulation of results and in my view some kind of organised crime is behind the ''inconsistency'' and ''human error''. It needs to be investigated accordingly. Bergvall's ''goal'' proves referees can choose which team wins or drops points, depending on the requirements put on the referees of the day: had he missed or,or the effort saved, he would have been booked. As it was, a booking would mean disallowing the goal and a goal means uncertainty in the result. Spurs travel then to Anfield with an advantage which is more interesting to betting , than a defeat or draw would have been. That is my personal view and I can see no other good explanation.
I usually just listen to the panel and enjoy the show and jokes. But I am 110% against VAR. Minimizing the mistakes is the intention, but now referees are less accountable and many of them simply don't take an action assuming the VAR will interfere if "it's a hauler"! And the VAR panel say, well we support the ref because we don't want to referee the match ourselves. Also, the game is losing a lot of the spontaneity. And since there is a lot of money involved, get competent referees, and make them accountable. They make the same mistakes over and over!
General public and online as well are hilarious,Spurs beat Liverpool bare boned and the overall narrative is that Liverpool was bad,now that is infact true however Liverpool were bad at the weekend as well yet everybody was sucking United's you know what and calling them incredible and they didn't even win the game lol Spurs win and still generally no credit,incredible
Also the games completely changed, the handball rule has a different interpretation every season.thats Anges point, if you don't get that, then you probably shouldn't be on a panel talking about it.
Virgil, no red card for his challenge into Solanke. Offside goal was dubious and was clearly not clear and obvious. Diaz deserved at least one yellow for one of his two simulations. One which Bergvall was booked for. Throw in the referees actually got the call correct according to the rules.. Liverpool fans needs to give their head a wobble. Outplayed by a 3rd string spurs side.
These guys will complain about anything. What’s wrong with the ref announcing the decision. We see it on the screen. He says it too. Great. Nothing ruined. These guys will complain even about how long the ref blew a whistle if they could.
Surprising to hear the panel say VAR hasn't changed the game. Whatever you think of Ange, VAR has changed the game. E.g. we now have double celebrations because we are waiting for VAR decisions, we have long periods of active play after an obvious off side decision because refs have been instructed to give the benefit of the doubt, and we wait minutes for play to resume because of VAR breaking up play and resulting in a lot of extra time. How has the game not changed? Just because you want to roast Ange doesn't mean you ignore something that obvious.
Woah woah woah! He wasn't walking back what he said... He doubled down, even when he is the recipient of a wry call. He's saying, if you don't like these calls, then you gotta dislike the system, not complain about Spurs being 'gifted' a win
Postecoglou wanted to distract the critics and commentators. He has copped a lot week to week (ange in and out) and so have players (Johnson son, kulusevski, dragusin). The commentary for the next week is this. The narrative is now dominated by this going into FA cup and Arsenal. He took the air out of the euphoria for the win and levelling it out. People want the right decision so does Ange. But whoever is using VAR really needs to know the rule with an element of common sense eg the handball. I understand he rationalised the bergvall 2nd yellow on the basis the ref played advantage- I don’t know if that is right but he has changed the narrative. Well done
Did this panel completely miss what Ange said? Tottenham have had countless fouls against them not booked because of "advantage" so whats going on? You going to ignore what he said ? You on the panel need to pull your fingers out of your arses and start examining which teams are engaging and getting away with fouls in lie of advantage because despite Craigs rebuttal statement its far from true across the board for all teams. Blind freddy can see that in the competition and not just Tottenham , certain teams get away with it more and it needs to redefined because its dodgy. Dont like being called for incompetence and favouritism? Get over it you clowns.
Shaka’s LOW IQ is exposed here. Who was expected to win? Liverpool. Who made a lot of money betting against them? Does that person know anyone in VAR? Maybe there lies the truth.
He has talked endlessly about his players performance and how good they are under pressure. So who cares about VAR. Why even talk about something that wont go away. What Ange is saying, just be happy with what we have as football purists. Its not really a debate
Not the first time Spurs won against LFC because of the ref and VAR incompetence and every time it happened, the coach said he doesn’t like to criticise the ref, VAR, blah, blah, blah. But when the decisions went against his team, he moaned like his team is the most unfairly treated by the offficials.
Ange's point is VAR isn't SIMPLIFYING decisions. It is COMPLICATING them. A handball in the buildup to a goal is supposed to be a NO GOAL decision. Or is it? It was. But maybe it's not. WE DON'T KNOW THE RULES OF THE GAME ANYMORE! And WE are the people that keep the game relevant.
Shaka : “ I don’t understand Ange’s point about VAR at all “ . Well Mr Hislop , explain the hand ball rule to us , and how many times has the FA tampered with it’s interpretation in the last 2 years ?
Imagine this is a football live show where they talk nothing about the football match itself espn needs to focus on the game not the noise around the game they spend the last few minutes talking about a press conference nothing about the match and the ref talking shameful
Pointless discussion about VAR and offsides. That is settled and no prehistoric aussie will change that. The important discussion was the horrendous decision not to show Bergwall a red.
Ange, did Dubavke get taken out by your player, no card? Tino taken out by your player, no card, then how about Gordon smashed in the face in the box, no pen or card.
Lil fella better worry about the script and make sure to prepare his players to put on a Netflix oscar worthy bottling in the next leg that's all we ask
Ange is wrong. The referee didn’t play advantage, the referee said it wasn’t a foul. VAR doesn’t review yellow cards, so it wasn’t reviewed. It should have been a yellow because it wasn’t in the final third and therefore couldn’t be an immediate goalscoring opportunity.
@@Kwami357 “When the challenge is made by Bergvall, referee Stuart Attwell appears to point at the ball to suggest the Tottenham player won it. There did not appear to be any indication of advantage being played, which he shouldn't do anyway for the second yellow. If the referee told the managers he played advantage and didn't show the yellow as it was stopping a promising attack, he's still admitting to an error.”
And Quansah chest pain too. Meanwhile theres a strange like fog across the globe with unknown large particles in the air that have a plaastic burning smell.
These old guys complain about modern technology so much.. It's the same technology that keeps players fit and help them play over 30 years without faltering.. It's the same modern technology that revitalizes players even after ACL injuries contrary to what happened in the 20th century.. If he's tired of modern tech then he should give up his modern house, his phones, cars and bank account then go back to wearing medieval clothes, go to stadiums on horses and play swø. rd fîghtīng ..He can add bow and arrows too
Any football fans who thinks there will be unanimous support when referees make on field calls are both stupid and uneducated about sports in general. Sometimes you get calls and sometimes you don't and that should remain the uncalculated factors in outcomes. Support referees because they do their job with human fallabes, just like all of us. Punish these players for onfield acting and verbal jabs and the game will be better controlled.
why cant we question the refs decision? are they the righteous? never make mistakes? why did they make silly decision that affect the game directly when they should be the most neutral one on the pitch? is it for more media contain?? is it to attract attention for the league?? why cant we have a good football game without any strange or never been seen before decision that only happen in england?? why the refs feel like celebrities? they should be footballer if they want more pay or support their hometown team.. be a neutral for 90 minutes ++ is it that hard for the english refs?? use VAR when you in doubt.. nothing wrong with that.. use the technology to confirm your decision is the right one.. if your decision is wrong then admit it and retake it.. is this so hard?
Postecoglou should just stop commenting on this becaude media outlets are too stupid to understand what he is trying to say. He and slot both alluded after the game that the new law they have been told by the premier league this year is that if a referee plays an advantage of a challenge then the referee can not go back and book that player. This is a new thing the Premier league have told managers. Thisnis what Postecoglou is saying. Whether you think it should be a second yellow or not. The rules that they have been told is that it is not a yellow card because the referee played advantage. Also I don't think the first yellow card was a yellow. Diaz dived. So not giving Bergvall a yellow for the 2nd challenge just cancels out the first
Wrong. Postenoclue is just waffling about BS and doesn't have a clue. He could have just admitted the ref's decision was wrong and move on. But no, he wants to try and take a high ride and look like and idiot.
@Urchinns interesting. VVD could have broken Solanke's leg by stomping on it. But no one seems to be talking about that though. He should have been sent off.
Ange increasingly talking garbbage….. because this season his results are very bad. IFab rules are clear… it was a foul and clear second yellow and sending off. Ref decided the game for Spurs.
The simplest explanation as to why he didn’t give the second yellow card is because he felt like the first yellow card was too harsh, and therefore giving him a second yellow card to send him off would have been unfair to the player. This happens in football all the time. Referees try to make up for their perceived mistakes all the time. I agree with the decision not to give him the second yellow card because he didn’t deserve the first yellow card.
hey how about the best team in Europe just wins and instead of making excuses ..all teams get done like this and we have to move on but because its LiVARpool the whole worlds gatta stop
The point ange is making is that all the "small " rule changes during the season chip away at the integrity of the game . Well done ange
Integrity? Sounds like an old wooden ship.
It would help if they actually discussed what Ange spoke about:
Newcastle - "handball" leading to equaliser.
In their day, it would've been handball, likely without question but play on in 2025.
Liverpool - Ange spoke about when advantage is played, they fouling player won't receive a yellow card (and being told this by officials). The fouling player would normally receive a card, regardless of advantage being played or not.
2 simple incidents yet unheard by the panel 🥱
Great stuff. 🙃
Lastly, Ange did talk about how well his team played, Bergvall, Gray etc after Bentancur's injury, and how good Liverpool are, although not to get carried away. It's only half time in the tie with a trip to Anfield to come.
Good performance and result, albeit somewhat fortunate.
Sure, except the panel would rather discuss Ange's hypocrisy - it gets more views. Both Shaka and Craig were correct in calling it out from one game to the next, that's why they spent so much time on it. Talking about the facts of the game are kind of boring to most viewers who watched the game. Ange isn't acting in good faith here, he's trying to have a bit each way as we say here in Aussie land. I like Ange and hope he does well, but he is clearly feeling the pressure at the moment and using deflection tactics and talking out of both sides of his mouth. So much so that again the panel correctly pointed out the most cringey part of the presser where he was back tracking and trying to explain away what he said post Newcastle. It was so obvious to everyone that he felt emboldened by the really good result, but that's the time that he should stuff the ego back down and just keep quiet. Again, he's clearly feeling the pressure at the moment. Then he started going on some weird diatribe about being a lone warrior fighting the good fight for the good of the game. It's all very unnecessary and just guff, he's employed by Tottenham to coach and win, no one employed him to do whatever that is. Focus on making Tottenham better.
You just owned that panel.
I’m with Ange regards these changes. The ref talking to the stadium explaining the decision reeked of American Football. What is next stoppages for ads during the game? Whilst VAR has been around for a while the CL use is less intrusive on the game compared to what’s happening in England. Video quality is not good enough yet as shown on still shots. We’ve had VAR here in Australia for decades in Cricket and Rugby League. It is still getting decisions wrong more than it gets right. I’m happy with the automated offside and goal line technology but until the video technology improves the VAR bunker should be moth balled for now.
Craig, listen to Ange speak rather than the media agenda.
The Referee being forced to speak to 60,000 people for no reason is absolutely ridiculous.
Shaka was so spot on at the end about human error and nobody agreeing no matter what the outcome
Yep. It should never have been changed in the first place. Leave offside and handball as they were 20 years ago.
The hand ball rule literally changes every season
Ange is a smart man he distracts the medias attention cause he knows even if his young players played well he doesn't want to influence the media attention on to them. He is protecting the young players from inflated egos and indirectly keeps them focused and humble.
Protecting the player’s from inflated egos through his own inflated sense of importance. He can’t deal with criticism/ being challenged.
@@CG-fx9bl It's Fergie 101. He's deflecting the attention off of the players AND he's got the commentators talking about ref decisions. Do this enough and all of a sudden the 50/50 decisions start going your way because the refs don't want the heat turned on them for the next week. Every manager tries to do this no doubt but some do it better then others and Fergie was the GOAT at it.
@@CG-fx9bl lol what
@@mkf628 🤣 let’s try again. The guy above says he’s protecting the players from developing inflated egos, when he’s more likely protecting his own fragile ego & inability to accept criticism, by focusing on every decision that goes against Spurs, instead of focusing on adapting to the opposition’s game plan.
@@CG-fx9bl he won, it was 1:0.
Ange is saying " England fans are it is coming home" and other countries are winning the cup😂😂😂😂
var disrupts game and doesn't add much is what i believe Ange is saying
Very true.
I’d much rather hear the referees explain subjective decisions like why Bergvall was carded fouling Díaz but not carded fouling Tsmikas. Instead of referees explaining, like Craig correctly pointed out, objective decisions like offsides that are rubber stamping very black and white decisions once the lines are drawn.
Ya rules leave room for interpretation, if the ref feels that the foul was not overly aggressive, and plays advantage then he doesn’t go back and book a player for disrupting the transition which would normally be an automatic yellow. Subjective for sure but there is an argument that he was correct to not give a second yellow
This is the joke of VAR. It's made nothing better and it's only more confusing now.
If VAR was a challenge system, Ange would have challenged the first one, as he did in the game. He saw there wasn't contact and it was a dive by Diaz.
Slot would have challenged the second one and he'd have got his first yellow card and Bergval would have scored a legal goal. 🙂
The inconsistency is deliberate. So-called ''human error'' is almost never a factor with these highly trained professionals with monitors and replays available. Inconsistency deliberately allows manipulation of results and in my view some kind of organised crime is behind the ''inconsistency'' and ''human error''. It needs to be investigated accordingly. Bergvall's ''goal'' proves referees can choose which team wins or drops points, depending on the requirements put on the referees of the day: had he missed or,or the effort saved, he would have been booked. As it was, a booking would mean disallowing the goal and a goal means uncertainty in the result. Spurs travel then to Anfield with an advantage which is more interesting to betting , than a defeat or draw would have been. That is my personal view and I can see no other good explanation.
Ange is the man.
I usually just listen to the panel and enjoy the show and jokes. But I am 110% against VAR. Minimizing the mistakes is the intention, but now referees are less accountable and many of them simply don't take an action assuming the VAR will interfere if "it's a hauler"! And the VAR panel say, well we support the ref because we don't want to referee the match ourselves. Also, the game is losing a lot of the spontaneity. And since there is a lot of money involved, get competent referees, and make them accountable. They make the same mistakes over and over!
That's my rant against VAR. Its been building for years now 🤬. And breath 😮💨
General public and online as well are hilarious,Spurs beat Liverpool bare boned and the overall narrative is that Liverpool was bad,now that is infact true however Liverpool were bad at the weekend as well yet everybody was sucking United's you know what and calling them incredible and they didn't even win the game lol Spurs win and still generally no credit,incredible
Also the games completely changed, the handball rule has a different interpretation every season.thats Anges point, if you don't get that, then you probably shouldn't be on a panel talking about it.
Virgil, no red card for his challenge into Solanke.
Offside goal was dubious and was clearly not clear and obvious.
Diaz deserved at least one yellow for one of his two simulations. One which Bergvall was booked for.
Throw in the referees actually got the call correct according to the rules..
Liverpool fans needs to give their head a wobble. Outplayed by a 3rd string spurs side.
These guys will complain about anything. What’s wrong with the ref announcing the decision. We see it on the screen. He says it too. Great. Nothing ruined. These guys will complain even about how long the ref blew a whistle if they could.
Ange said stop changing the rules, the only consistent Technology system that no one cries about is goaline , everything else could be subjective !!
Surprising to hear the panel say VAR hasn't changed the game. Whatever you think of Ange, VAR has changed the game. E.g. we now have double celebrations because we are waiting for VAR decisions, we have long periods of active play after an obvious off side decision because refs have been instructed to give the benefit of the doubt, and we wait minutes for play to resume because of VAR breaking up play and resulting in a lot of extra time. How has the game not changed? Just because you want to roast Ange doesn't mean you ignore something that obvious.
Absolutely. Used to be if a goal looked close to offside you looked at the linesman and that was it.
Are they really saying VAR has not changed the game ? Really ?
Well said Zat Knight , I’d rather have the refs honest mistake , than a VAR rule with different interpretations .
VAR had to be the worst thing that happened to football! Now announcement on offsides?
Woah woah woah! He wasn't walking back what he said... He doubled down, even when he is the recipient of a wry call.
He's saying, if you don't like these calls, then you gotta dislike the system, not complain about Spurs being 'gifted' a win
If Ange wasn't Australian. They would take him more seriously.
His last name suggests he's Greek
@@jl8485we all hail from different lands but we’re all Australian
@@jl8485what is an Australian name then?
@@julesbrunton1728 , drongo is an Australian name it's used to identify 3 quarters of the people who are on these panels and reporters.
When you take 3-4 minutes and draw a collection of lines , to decide whether a goal is offside , then it’s not offside
Postecoglou wanted to distract the critics and commentators. He has copped a lot week to week (ange in and out) and so have players (Johnson son, kulusevski, dragusin). The commentary for the next week is this. The narrative is now dominated by this going into FA cup and Arsenal. He took the air out of the euphoria for the win and levelling it out. People want the right decision so does Ange. But whoever is using VAR really needs to know the rule with an element of common sense eg the handball. I understand he rationalised the bergvall 2nd yellow on the basis the ref played advantage- I don’t know if that is right but he has changed the narrative. Well done
what he's saying is VAR interrupts the game unnecessarily
Did this panel completely miss what Ange said? Tottenham have had countless fouls against them not booked because of "advantage" so whats going on? You going to ignore what he said ? You on the panel need to pull your fingers out of your arses and start examining which teams are engaging and getting away with fouls in lie of advantage because despite Craigs rebuttal statement its far from true across the board for all teams.
Blind freddy can see that in the competition and not just Tottenham , certain teams get away with it more and it needs to redefined because its dodgy.
Dont like being called for incompetence and favouritism? Get over it you clowns.
you still have a 2nd leg why all this DRAMA ?
Don't worry 😂😂
We fans don't smear mistakes with lotion ,a mistake is a mistake remember a team can lose a trophy with 2 points.
Shaka’s LOW IQ is exposed here. Who was expected to win? Liverpool. Who made a lot of money betting against them? Does that person know anyone in VAR? Maybe there lies the truth.
Qanon?
These guys should have been showed the full presser 😂😂
He is right , liverpool had been consistent on decision against them therefore there must be somethings cooking behind the scene.
Unfair decisions do happen (Spurs have had a lot of bad calls go against them recently too) but no need for conspiracy theories.
ESPN Banter FC at it again!!!
Ange talks with so much gravitas, that sometimes you forget he's just mostly giving emotional reactions!
He has talked endlessly about his players performance and how good they are under pressure. So who cares about VAR. Why even talk about something that wont go away. What Ange is saying, just be happy with what we have as football purists. Its not really a debate
Ange master of disguise. Makes everyone think he doesn’t change tactics. But that game was not his usual Tactics!
Not the first time Spurs won against LFC because of the ref and VAR incompetence and every time it happened, the coach said he doesn’t like to criticise the ref, VAR, blah, blah, blah. But when the decisions went against his team, he moaned like his team is the most unfairly treated by the offficials.
Yet, you won a Champions League final against Tottenham via a bad call. Karma
VAR in England is politics!
Ange's point is VAR isn't SIMPLIFYING decisions. It is COMPLICATING them. A handball in the buildup to a goal is supposed to be a NO GOAL decision. Or is it? It was. But maybe it's not. WE DON'T KNOW THE RULES OF THE GAME ANYMORE! And WE are the people that keep the game relevant.
Shaka : “ I don’t understand Ange’s point about VAR at all “ . Well Mr Hislop , explain the hand ball rule to us , and how many times has the FA tampered with it’s interpretation in the last 2 years ?
VAR is the best thing to happen to soccer
Loss is never fun but I am glad that we won the league game. League is the most important priority for LFC fans
Imagine this is a football live show where they talk nothing about the football match itself espn needs to focus on the game not the noise around the game they spend the last few minutes talking about a press conference nothing about the match and the ref talking shameful
"Nothing has changed in the game" clowns the added time system has changed the goalkeepers protection have seemingly changed
You were playing with words Ange!
Pointless discussion about VAR and offsides. That is settled and no prehistoric aussie will change that. The important discussion was the horrendous decision not to show Bergwall a red.
Craig who
Not even spot on all the time. I will take 50% at this point.
Group think is an issue, when is the last time you saw a ref of going back and giving a yellow card this season, following an advantage?
Liverpool are in trouble in this competition
Ange, did Dubavke get taken out by your player, no card? Tino taken out by your player, no card, then how about Gordon smashed in the face in the box, no pen or card.
Calm down guys. It’s gonna be a hammering for spurs at anfield ina month
Ok lets say we remove VAR , are all the mistakes REFS make be gone or it will be worse without VAR ?
Lil fella better worry about the script and make sure to prepare his players to put on a Netflix oscar worthy bottling in the next leg that's all we ask
Jeez, Zat makes Kieran Gibbs seem like the laugh and soul of the party 😴
Ange take so different from Newcastle & Liverpool match 🥱
This was a cynical foul. He tried to stop the advantage to Liverpool. It was a second yellow. They got away with one.
"as long that its not a cynical foul" what kind of a stupid aussie reasoning is that to say compared to the foul his player did
Since VAR came which team get benefited most ? Liverpool
Ange is wrong. The referee didn’t play advantage, the referee said it wasn’t a foul. VAR doesn’t review yellow cards, so it wasn’t reviewed. It should have been a yellow because it wasn’t in the final third and therefore couldn’t be an immediate goalscoring opportunity.
They did. Looks like you didn't watch the game 😂😂😂
@@Kwami357you do know that var cant get involved with yellow cards m8 and I did watch the match btw just saying 🤔
@@Kwami357 “When the challenge is made by Bergvall, referee Stuart Attwell appears to point at the ball to suggest the Tottenham player won it. There did not appear to be any indication of advantage being played, which he shouldn't do anyway for the second yellow. If the referee told the managers he played advantage and didn't show the yellow as it was stopping a promising attack, he's still admitting to an error.”
Does Burley say anything that is not obvious?
lol.. Ange Hypocritoglu
It is very strange that all the Spurs players get "flu" at the same time and Bentacur has some kind of stroke. What they jabbing them with?
And Quansah chest pain too. Meanwhile theres a strange like fog across the globe with unknown large particles in the air that have a plaastic burning smell.
@@noahide7256 Yeah. I think they might spraying stuff that makes us fatigued.
But the first yellow card was not a fowl
Sucks you can’t really celebrate a goal in the moment
These commentators are so ignorant
These old guys complain about modern technology so much.. It's the same technology that keeps players fit and help them play over 30 years without faltering..
It's the same modern technology that revitalizes players even after ACL injuries contrary to what happened in the 20th century..
If he's tired of modern tech then he should give up his modern house, his phones, cars and bank account then go back to wearing medieval clothes, go to stadiums on horses and play
swø. rd fîghtīng ..He can add bow and arrows too
so you hate old people?
Bro is confusing Science for Technology 🎉
@@Carlsbad1985technology is built on science Lol
@@eL--RaLEL FAILEd in science tests for sure smh
"Man, shouts at cloud!" 😅
Who cares, Spurs are always gonna be a mid club. Stop whining
Any football fans who thinks there will be unanimous support when referees make on field calls are both stupid and uneducated about sports in general. Sometimes you get calls and sometimes you don't and that should remain the uncalculated factors in outcomes. Support referees because they do their job with human fallabes, just like all of us. Punish these players for onfield acting and verbal jabs and the game will be better controlled.
Ange is box office. Similar to Mourinho the premier League would be boring without him.
why cant we question the refs decision? are they the righteous? never make mistakes? why did they make silly decision that affect the game directly when they should be the most neutral one on the pitch? is it for more media contain?? is it to attract attention for the league?? why cant we have a good football game without any strange or never been seen before decision that only happen in england?? why the refs feel like celebrities? they should be footballer if they want more pay or support their hometown team.. be a neutral for 90 minutes ++ is it that hard for the english refs?? use VAR when you in doubt.. nothing wrong with that.. use the technology to confirm your decision is the right one.. if your decision is wrong then admit it and retake it.. is this so hard?
Postecoglou should just stop commenting on this becaude media outlets are too stupid to understand what he is trying to say. He and slot both alluded after the game that the new law they have been told by the premier league this year is that if a referee plays an advantage of a challenge then the referee can not go back and book that player. This is a new thing the Premier league have told managers. Thisnis what Postecoglou is saying. Whether you think it should be a second yellow or not. The rules that they have been told is that it is not a yellow card because the referee played advantage.
Also I don't think the first yellow card was a yellow. Diaz dived. So not giving Bergvall a yellow for the 2nd challenge just cancels out the first
😂😂
Dived out the way of the tackle. Nearly chopped Diaz in half 💳 😂
Don't worry mate. The journalists won't understand this 😂
Wrong. Postenoclue is just waffling about BS and doesn't have a clue. He could have just admitted the ref's decision was wrong and move on. But no, he wants to try and take a high ride and look like and idiot.
@Urchinns interesting. VVD could have broken Solanke's leg by stomping on it. But no one seems to be talking about that though. He should have been sent off.
Ange increasingly talking garbbage….. because this season his results are very bad. IFab rules are clear… it was a foul and clear second yellow and sending off. Ref decided the game for Spurs.
Y'all needs not to blame Ange but those journalists asking sometimes irrelevant questions
The simplest explanation as to why he didn’t give the second yellow card is because he felt like the first yellow card was too harsh, and therefore giving him a second yellow card to send him off would have been unfair to the player. This happens in football all the time. Referees try to make up for their perceived mistakes all the time. I agree with the decision not to give him the second yellow card because he didn’t deserve the first yellow card.
nope. this is wrong. There should not be any "make up"
@@jkyotube That's EXACTLY the point to a mature brain instead of all the waffling ... Factuality 💯 ..
@@jkyotube well he was wrong to give the first yellow card too
@ericsarpong1792 2 wrongs doesnt make a right. the foul should be called. he can choose not to give a second yellow but that was an obvious foul
Arne Snot making excuses for liVARpoop like they haven’t been helped by the refs all season
Lol😅 wow bitter sweet u guys sound like u support liverpool or arsenal ange will finish u up 2nd leg trust me# u got humbled
hey how about the best team in Europe just wins and instead of making excuses ..all teams get done like this and we have to move on but because its LiVARpool the whole worlds gatta stop