I swapped Windows for Linux as my default OS. Here is WHY!

I am using Linux since 1999 but NOT on my main computer with which I do 99% of my work. The summer of 2022 Linux displaced Windows on both my PC & my heart. The current version of my choice is Xubuntu.
😊 My social links
➥ www.DJopensource.com
🟢 My music on Spotify
➥ open.spotify.com/artist/2gpon...
🎚 My Spotify playlists
➥ open.spotify.com/user/ii93onz...
🎻 My Orchestrations
➥ / angelosmavros
🤡 Psycomics series
➥ / psycomics

[@iliqiliev]

It's really pleasant listening to your accent and rudeness towards windblows ahahaha great video

[@prabuddh_mathur]

"Those who don't have brains have strongs hands! "Lmfao!
Kudos to you man. 😂😂

[@kychemclass5850]

Hahahaha. :D
I left Windows almost 2 years ago. It was just about the only good thing I've ever done! LOL

[@linkdesink]

I strongly disagree with this video, I am using Linux and windows for nearly twenty years, few thoughts for me
Linux runs windows applications better than windows, that is a joke and simply not truth a native application runs better on the system that is intended and designed for, A lot of times windows apps on Linux have weird and buggy behavior and it is normal.
Windows strong point is that they have amazing backwards compatibility, Linux hasn't any backwards compatibility. A reason that windows is so popular on Enterprise is because of backward compatibility, you can develop or buy a windows application for your company and you can run the same application after 20 years on the new windows version, I am working with scientific programs as chemist and i have run the same applications on windows XP/7/8.1/10/11 without any problem, try to do the same on Linux.
Of course it isn't true that all of windows apps runs on linux, office, photoshop, autocad, a lot of scientific programs etc, aren't ported on Linux and with wine is unusable or pretty buggy.
About the formats i have run on my desktop windows 10 for six years and i have updated to windows 11, my installation is right now seven years old and it is running pretty smooth and without any problems.
Both operating systems are great for different user cases.

[@reoencarcelado5904]

@Isaak-Papadopoulos:
Hello Mr. Papadopoulos:
I have seen cases in which Windows software (of the same version-number; I hope [that that] is what you were referring-to) works with newer-versions of Windows, just like you said. But I have *also* seen cases in which the software that I ran on Windows 98, I couldn't install it on Windows XP (even utilizing the Windows-XP "Compatibility Mode" setting), and the software that I ran on Windows XP, I couldn't install it on Windows 7. (Even computer-games, such as "Where In The World Is Carmen Sandiego?", "Titanic: Adventure Out Of Time", "Command And Conquer", "Starcraft", "Microsoft Fury 3", "Descent 2", "Sim City 2000", "J.A.N.E.'S Advanced Tactical Fighters", "Microsoft Flight Simulator for Windows 95", "Microsoft Space Simulator", "Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia 97", (this was software that I had on Microsoft Windows 98), "Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia Deluxe Edition for Windows XP", "Star Wars: Knights Of The Old Republic", "Star Wars: Knights Of The Old Republic 2: The Sith Lords", "Star Wars: Jedi Knight: Jedi Academy", "Star Wars: Jedi Knight: Jedi Outcast", "Star Wars: Republic Commando", "Star Wars: Bounty Hunter", "Star Wars: Jedi Knight: Dark Forces 2", (this was software that I had on Microsoft Windows XP Professional), and many other games-and-software).
Whereas on GNU+Linux, (my own personal experience), if you have a "Rolling-Release"-type distribution, the software that you have installed-in-your-GNU+Linux-distro will never go "out of date" and/or "expire"; you can just keep updating it to the newest version (IF you want to), but the older-version software will still work even on a newer version of your desktop-environment; of-course, the hardware dies.

[@linkdesink]

@@reoencarcelado5904 of course there are exceptions, but generally speaking windows has much better backwards compability than Linux.
I am also using a rolling distro, but it isn't the same thing. Your apps of course if you keep updating they are going to be compatible, but the biggest problem is for example scientific apps, or application that one company develops from themselves.
In these situations a lot of companies want to continue working with their ten years old self developed applications on new hardware and new edition of windows.
On Linux there isn't any backward compability and it is impossible ,and this is a strong seeling point of windows on enterprise systems.
I will give you a personal example, i am working as chemist and the instruments that i am using every day, they have specific applications, i have worked with the same application on windows XP/7/10 and eleven, is really important in such cases if the hardware dies that you can still use your scientific app that you have purchased ten years ago on new system, because there are instruments that are costing 100.000 euros and more.
Maybe with snaps and flatpacks the situation is going to be better because your app is bundled with dependencies and it can work in every distro, theoritically you can run for example your old app on Ubuntu 16.04, 18.04,20.04,22.04 etc.
Keep in mind that in rolling distros you can always update your apps, but what happens if you must use proprietary software like scientific apps, these applications arent updating together with the foss apps.
In some cases is vital to run older apps on newer systems.
The companies don't want to pay from new windows licence and new specific applications licences.

[@reoencarcelado5904]

@@linkdesink i said, i said, i've had [old-versions of] Linux programs work despite me updating my desktop-environment (examples: Firefox. Gimp. VLC Media Player. & others).
You also said, "company software / software exclusively-designed for companies". Software-like-that is bound to have a long shelf-life. I'm talking-about *consumer* software; software that individuals would use; software that, in the old Windows versions, wouldn't work, because it (ie. the software) is always being updated, and the newer-versions are made[/created/designed] to be compatible only with the most-recent versions of Windows. (My sources of this being true, besides myself?, friends-&-colleagues,--&--systems-administrators-of-my-old-schools-&-universities, that told me this, and-that have shown me this to be true).
Examples (like I said before): the computer-games I mentioned, the productivity-software I mentioned, etcetera etcetera. Even newer versions of LibreOffice are-not compatible with-Windows-XP. And same goes for newer-versions of software such-as Microsoft Office.
P.S. On Linux there are also software (the plural definition of the word "software", not the singular definition) that *are NOT* open-source. (ie. as-in, that the source-code is Proprietary).
P.P.S. On Linux there is still backwards-compatibility with SOME-things. Usb external 3-&-a-half-inch floppy-disk--drives still-work on Linux, for example.
P.P.P.S. Chemistry was one of my favorite subjects back in High school :-) .

[@unintentionallyRandom]

This inflamed tone is a disservice to Linux.

[@OutSid3r]

And to Blondes too.