Icom IC-7300 VS IC-756PROIII RX

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 дек 2024

Комментарии • 86

  • @yaesuicomkenwood
    @yaesuicomkenwood 8 лет назад +11

    from 1:30 min. until the end, the NB of IC-7300 was off, but ON at PRO3.
    73 as Mark

  • @brunoacosta4349
    @brunoacosta4349 9 месяцев назад +1

    El 756PRO lll es una de las mejores plataformas ... todos los días me sorprende mas

  • @RU2AIM
    @RU2AIM 4 года назад +3

    *I found my 756Pro3 fatiguing to listen to for long periods so I purchased a small Chinese 3w tube headphone amplifier, added it to the audio chain and Voilà, smooth audio.*

  • @limatango17
    @limatango17 5 лет назад +5

    Great example of two completely different receivers. A tick on the wall for the ICOM IC-756PROlll. It absolutely slaughters the IC-7300 in all aspects... 73 De VK4FLJT Down Under 😊😎

    • @vk5jajay147
      @vk5jajay147 4 года назад

      It sure does, and We will own one from today 👌😊
      Happy DXing...

  • @watchfan6180
    @watchfan6180 5 лет назад +5

    My friend G7CAK introduced me to Icom and their menu with legendary filtering. I never looked back, they are each good but 7300 has better tone. However, small differences they are equally great radios. What a legend the PRO is, after all these years it still kicks ass against more modern radios. They need to re issue this for the next generation.

    • @JTNicolas
      @JTNicolas  5 лет назад

      Total agree with your comment, strong construction and performance, now have the IC-7610, very happy with it, big screen, have no complaint at all. 73 from XE land.

    • @TE5LA-GAMING
      @TE5LA-GAMING Год назад

      Disagree, the 756 has better tone, much lower frequency response. I think if you used the EQ, it could sound much better.

  • @W-733_KWX
    @W-733_KWX 8 лет назад +6

    NB and NR off on 7300 ?

  • @slbynum
    @slbynum 8 лет назад +3

    AGC is set slower on the PRO3...easy to see by just watching the S meter on both rigs.

  • @silvioduarte1512
    @silvioduarte1512 5 лет назад +1

    amo el 756 pro..tengo el II y la recepcion es una delicia..

  • @JTNicolas
    @JTNicolas  7 лет назад +1

    Hay muchas opiniones en Internet sobre este radio y su tecnología, no creo recordar a ningún modelo despertar tanta curiosidad y buenos resultados, creo que las demás compañias empezaran a usar el sistema SDR muy pronto, esperemos que el nuevo IC-7610 anunciado en reemplazo del IC-7600 cause tantas satisfacciones como el 7300. Por el precio que para muchos es el tema principal, el 7300 lo compensa perfectamente y se puede decir que mucho mas que en otros muy costosos.

  • @chicopintudo3443
    @chicopintudo3443 Год назад +1

    SEM DÚVIDA ALGUMA, FICO COM 756 PRO ||| , PARA MIM, MUITO MAIS RÁDIO, SEM DEIXAR DE FALAR SOBRE O VU ANALÓGICO !!! TOP D+ 👊😜🇧🇷

  • @yaesuicomkenwood
    @yaesuicomkenwood 7 лет назад +17

    but anyhow, the IC-756PROIII sounds better

  • @uradiosupply
    @uradiosupply 8 лет назад

    Tuve el 756proIII y viendo los adelantos tecnológicos del 7300 quiero uno de estos, por ahora tengo sólo el Yaesu FT991 y pensaba en adquirir el FTDX1200, sin embargo el 7300 a captado mi atención.

  • @st8kout961
    @st8kout961 8 лет назад +5

    Comparing receivers getting S9 signals is not much of a competition. Pretty sure most want to know how will it can dig out a weak signal.

    • @YourOldDog
      @YourOldDog 8 лет назад +1

      Very much agree. I want to hear signals on the edge of receivability.

    • @st8kout961
      @st8kout961 8 лет назад +2

      I've since bought a 7300 and am satisfied with it. I think you'd have to spend a whole lot more money to do much better, except for the Elecraft KX3 which has an excellent receiver, but does not have the power and features of the 7300. The Spectrum Waterfall is so great that it should be as standard as a volume control. You see a signal and just tap it to go there (I use an ipad stylus). I'm even finding shortwave stations I never knew existed (and no, they are not all religious broadcasting). Some play pretty good music late at night when the ham bands are dead. The fidelity of the 7300's audio is pretty darn good.
      I sometimes see a dot moving across the band and makes a chirp when it crosses over where I'm tuned. I found out these chirp transmitters are to take ionosphere readings for research. Learn something new everyday.

  • @HamRadioAdventures
    @HamRadioAdventures 8 лет назад +5

    756 sound a little better to me, but it could be just me. Thanks!

    • @hubsi5263
      @hubsi5263 7 лет назад +4

      on the ProIII NB and NR are activated, on the 7300 not...

  • @joseasr
    @joseasr 7 лет назад

    me gusta mucho la calidad de audio del 7300, te felicito.

    • @gradus8373
      @gradus8373 Год назад

      Нужен еще хороший спиер

  • @Sky1
    @Sky1 7 лет назад

    I've been on DMR the past few weeks due to crappy band conditions. I forgot how annoying static was.

  • @dougg9189
    @dougg9189 8 лет назад

    The sound is immaculate out of these icoms

  • @AudiophileTubes
    @AudiophileTubes 4 года назад +3

    756 Pro3 winner

  • @TheYodastar
    @TheYodastar 8 лет назад +1

    I just sold my Pro 3...superb radio...bought it new 9 years ago just months before it was disco'd by Icom. It was flawless with few hours but the reason I sold it was because Icom no longer services them (for the most part) because many components are no longer available. I read horror stories of displays going dark for various reasons etcetera and little can be done. I'm ordering this 7300...I still have my Elecraft K3 for a good comparison to a "high end" radio...we shall see.

    • @crobulari2328
      @crobulari2328 8 лет назад

      +TheYodastar 7300 sounds like a super regen to me. Maybe if I hear one in the flesh ??.

    • @dannelson8556
      @dannelson8556 7 лет назад +2

      You do realize there is an aftermarket LED backbit Replacement LCD kit available for the pro-3 . The Pro-3 is an Iconic thoroughly field tested contest rig that even to this day gives much more modern radios a run for their money even at times surpassing them. there are still quite a few high end multi multi contest stations using pro-3's and that should tell you something.
      there have been several famous multi multi contest stations who got rid of their Pro-3's and switched to K3's only to switch back to pro-3s a few years later.
      It wasn't about performance but rather the efficiency of the user interface. The user interface of the Pro-3 is much better than the K3 for fast paced operating environments. they also realized that the hyped up lab specs of the K3 didn't really pan out to much of an advantage in the real world.

  • @mcc7370
    @mcc7370 3 года назад +1

    Hello, I have a lcom IC 756 Pro 111. I need to sell it. What would be a second hand price'2 it works and looks brand new.

    • @JTNicolas
      @JTNicolas  3 года назад

      The market sometimes is rude specially with upcoming of nrw technologies, are you in USA? I recommend see different used equipment sites even eBay (please note the take a good share of the sale price) and make your desition, good luck. (I sold mine like 6-7 years ago for 650.00)

  • @kp4cz-Jose
    @kp4cz-Jose Год назад

    Saludos , Para mi el receiver esta casi igual , yo tengo los dos radios y solo hay que jugar con el AF y squelch en el icom los tengo a 6.0 y suena muy soft en vez de sharp. 73's and Happy dx!!!

  • @austieoutdoors9763
    @austieoutdoors9763 2 года назад

    im going with the 756 but i would say that because i own one but good video from m7byf

  • @JoseGutierrezGarciaEA3EZD
    @JoseGutierrezGarciaEA3EZD 8 лет назад +1

    Y el NR en el 7300 donde esta es enganarse a si mismo el 756proIII suena a nr fuerte.
    Y supongo que no hace contest mirese la lista SERWOOD

  • @jimmyalizanoa8252
    @jimmyalizanoa8252 3 года назад

    Con el tiempo que tienenes utilizando estos equipos cuál recomiendas utilizar en caso de un radioaficionado que tenga presupuesto para comprar solo 1 de esas unidades ! Saludos 73s

    • @JTNicolas
      @JTNicolas  3 года назад

      El 756PROlll tiene tiempo que dejo de fabricarse y aunque fue líder por su calidad en el aire por varios años, la tecnología en el 7300 es excelente en un pequeño paquete, no creo que te arrepientas en adquirir uno, hay miles en el aire y todavía no he oído alguien que se queje.

    • @jimmyalizanoa8252
      @jimmyalizanoa8252 3 года назад

      @@JTNicolas Muchas gracias por la información te lo agradezco entonces no se diga más a por 7300 de Icom ! Saludos espero escucharte por la banda
      Atte Jimmy TI5WNF 73s

  • @edoardodipaola5360
    @edoardodipaola5360 2 года назад

    COME SI PUÒ FARE UN PARAGONE CON IL 756 PRO 3, CHE È MOLTO MA MOLTO SUPERIORE, RISPETTO AL 7300,👌👌👌👌👌👌

  • @paulhawk8277
    @paulhawk8277 7 лет назад

    Just wondering if the scope on pro 3 is real time or sweeps and u lose receiver when it sweeps?

    • @JTNicolas
      @JTNicolas  7 лет назад

      It sweeps in real time and RX still active, beautifull.!!

    • @paulhawk8277
      @paulhawk8277 7 лет назад

      XE2SI. Nice,thank you 73

  • @Capecodham
    @Capecodham 8 лет назад

    Great narration

  • @EA8TL
    @EA8TL 8 лет назад +4

    Both radios have the FIL 2, but the IC7300 have the Twin PBT (Passband Tuning) modified. You can see the dot on the screen
    It is not good compared this way.
    73

  • @BruceNitroxpro
    @BruceNitroxpro 6 лет назад

    On the Internet it is not "PC" to post "RTFM" comments. But here one is really needed.

  • @audioworkshop1
    @audioworkshop1 8 лет назад +1

    the only thing this proves is that you cant do direct comparisons on you tube with dissimilar speakers... yes there going to sound different because of the perceived audio, not the performance difference....

  • @organiccold
    @organiccold 3 года назад +1

    I have both and i barely use the 7300, the Pro 3 is a hell of better radio.

  • @WNDFishingTeam
    @WNDFishingTeam 8 лет назад +4

    756proIII more better

  • @davidburdsall5757
    @davidburdsall5757 7 лет назад +1

    Pro 3 takes it for me I have pro3 and 7600 and still think pro3 has quietest RX I will still get a 7300 when I can just like Icoms

  • @jamesk0ua
    @jamesk0ua 6 лет назад +2

    I traded my 756pro3 in for my second 7300. The receiver in the 7300 is better than the pro3, and the transmitter stays cooler in digital modes. In other words the cooling efficiency is better in the 7300.

    • @mikesimpson6757
      @mikesimpson6757 5 лет назад +1

      I guess it is all up to personal preference. I would love to have either one of those radios.....The 7300 right now is really affordable. The 756pro3 is like people think like they are sitting on a pot of gold and wont drop the price

  • @123christoff
    @123christoff 8 лет назад +3

    sounds like pro 3 got a better speaker

  • @leksandrlekh859
    @leksandrlekh859 6 лет назад +3

    My icom 765 +roofing filter +fun cube dongle pro plus - more better...

  • @josecastelloperis4879
    @josecastelloperis4879 8 лет назад

    Tienes el filtro2 desplazado en el 7300

  • @IronManXXX
    @IronManXXX 5 лет назад

    Pro3 sounds more enjoyable to listen to....but don't know the settings on either (i.e. NR Levels, etc.)

  • @Cheeseoverdose
    @Cheeseoverdose 4 года назад

    756 sounds better, but 7300 seems to be able to filter out the noise better

    • @TE5LA-GAMING
      @TE5LA-GAMING Год назад

      I hear more noise on the 7300 because it's audio is more concentrated in the frequencies near the noise.

  • @crobulari2328
    @crobulari2328 8 лет назад +7

    7300 has noisy receiver !!.

    • @KD8GKR
      @KD8GKR 3 года назад

      rf gain is also rolled a lot higher on the 7300 than the pro3 watch 5:25-5:45

  • @dougsmyth6403
    @dougsmyth6403 3 года назад

    Filter on the 756 pro 3 on narrow

  • @delfinoillescas4288
    @delfinoillescas4288 8 лет назад +1

    mmmm el 756 trabaja pero muy biennnnnnnnnnnnn

  • @plukkie3
    @plukkie3 8 лет назад

    tx is in split, so tuner is only set to 14 Mhz

  • @jeromegrzelak8236
    @jeromegrzelak8236 8 лет назад

    this is a step above the all american 5 or the regen kg6mn

  • @JuscelinoRochaRF
    @JuscelinoRochaRF 7 лет назад +2

    os dois equipamentos são muito ruidosos.

    • @chicopintudo3443
      @chicopintudo3443 Год назад +2

      Som capturado pelo celular ou câmera amplifica os ruídos, infelizmente não é 1 som fiel !!! Gde 73 ✌️😎

    • @JuscelinoRochaRF
      @JuscelinoRochaRF Год назад

      @@chicopintudo3443 Já tive , IC718, IC746PRO, 756PRO2 , PRO3. Todos foram vendidos porque me cansava a cabeça depois de meia hora de audição devido ao ruído junto com o sinal. Não tenho esse problema com os transceptores da Yaesu. Hoje tenho um FT1000 mark V field e um FTDX10. Dois ótimos equipamentos tanto para escuta quanto para tx. Mas em parte vc tem razão no seu comentário, pois a fidelidade de captura de um celular não é mesmo a melhor forma para retratar o que se está sendo gravado.

  • @n5ifi
    @n5ifi 8 лет назад +3

    ICOM has noisy receiver.

    • @JTNicolas
      @JTNicolas  8 лет назад

      Wich one?

    • @n5ifi
      @n5ifi 8 лет назад +1

      Both are considerable noisier than my SDR 1000. That could be in the way they are setup only. I don't know.

    • @SWRadioConcepts
      @SWRadioConcepts 8 лет назад +1

      I've noticed when I record radios with my phone doing videos that the cameras microphone really amplifies the hash. I wouldn't judge to harshly based on a youtube video shot on an iPhone.

  • @macattach8510
    @macattach8510 8 лет назад +4

    My IC-775DSP sounds better then both.. :0)

    • @SWRadioConcepts
      @SWRadioConcepts 8 лет назад +2

      The 7300 has a lab tested much better receiver. Try filming your radio on a smartphone and playing it back and see how great it sounds. lulz.

    • @davidisraelyan5017
      @davidisraelyan5017 7 лет назад

      lol, you're nuts!

    • @radioman6489
      @radioman6489 6 лет назад

      David Israelyan ,, Dave, you have know idea how great the 775 DSP IS. If you have the right filters in the radio it will out perform 97% of the radios out there. I can make one filter change and have a 2.8 to 2.9 in transmit audio. When it comes to receive forget the 775DSP WILL DESTROY THAT RADIO WITH THE RIGHT FILTER SETUP. End of story

    • @radioman6489
      @radioman6489 6 лет назад

      remingtonh ,. Read what I wrote below to the other person below. You set the IC-775DSP UP RIGHT with filters it will destroy 97% of the Radios out there.

    • @radioman6489
      @radioman6489 6 лет назад

      remingtonh , another thing I forgot to mention a friend of mine which has been an amateur for years couldn't believe the receive. He said it blew his 756prolll out of the water. That was even before I did the filters up In the 775.

  • @topogigio204
    @topogigio204 8 лет назад +3

    Pro 3 WIN

  • @HL3LMS
    @HL3LMS 7 лет назад +1

    IC-7300 VERY GOOD RIG

  • @iantoleo
    @iantoleo Год назад

    both receivers are bad

  • @GroznyDj
    @GroznyDj 7 лет назад

    897 more better

    • @RU2AIM
      @RU2AIM 4 года назад +1

      *In a fantasy world. Not even with the INRAD Collins 2.9KHz SSB filter.*

    • @GroznyDj
      @GroznyDj 4 года назад +1

      @@RU2AIM My mistake, I mean 756PROIII. Don't know why I wrote about 897 :D

    • @RU2AIM
      @RU2AIM 4 года назад +1

      @@GroznyDj LOL! - I thought you were implying the 897 was better than both Icoms

    • @GroznyDj
      @GroznyDj 4 года назад +1

      @@RU2AIM Probably I watched different movie with 897 and sent comment in wrong place :) I had PROIII and this radio is a legend, one of the greatest ever made - in my opinion, and sounds this movie better than 7300. Regards friend!

    • @RU2AIM
      @RU2AIM 4 года назад

      @@GroznyDj 👌

  • @dougsmyth6403
    @dougsmyth6403 3 года назад +1

    Filter on the 756 pro 3 on narrow