For a correspondence that may mean nothing in physics, may mean nothing, but is still a such impressive and elegant mathematical solution that may help in a lot of domain, that we don't see yet, but one day may change a lot of things.
It's crazy to have a reason to discourage a universal time standard, for supposing a reality of growing time divergences, especially with gravity as the only excuse. Keeping wavelength constant, together with constant time and space metrics, while letting frequency vary, means initially redshifted light realistically must be light initially slowed by decreased gravity. Same with a passing rumble-strip effect. Light frequency is independent of photon rate, meaning a constant-rate countable photon (or light pulse) source gives the only reliable light-based indicator for time rate. Heisenberg's uncertainty applied to light says a perfectly tight frequency source is a perfectly random phase timing source, so atomic clock frequency means basically nothing about the only good time rate measure, namely photon rate.
Where can one get the problem sheet, mentioned by Dr. Maldacena, is it published somewhere, maybe there is some course page, dedicated to that past event?
The only coupling applicable to observations, is the general type familiar in musical chords, or, in keeping with the BBT , with a central point connection and radial time-inflation quantum field of fields, ..in the projections of a real-virtual image. It's Information distributed infinitely, in the bits and bytes of the universe, from out of a timing duration QM memory. Probability one, as it applies to the universal wave, is "counted" and established by the sampling/measurement process of infinite/eternal timing, and allows for the time-reversal counter process of "directional" superposition such that the likelihood of possible states proceeds from one to minus one, in the range/interval from infinity to possible zero at the limits. In orientation, 1-1=0, 1=1(+/-) probability, corresponds to the Quantum Mechanism +/-, = and "i" at zero coordinates of the universal wave of all orthogonal/omnidirectional superimposed possibility/probability timing combinations/permutations. "Ordinary probability is "contained" continuously within conjugate possibility "condensed" in superposition of harmonic/resonant boundaries of the observable mathematical structure. If there's to be this logical-mathematical speculation on the mode of representation of the mechanism, I'm not the one to do that because the nomenclature for complex compounded structures is application specific. The course of logic that can stay in contact with the surrounding environment is, as Professor Susskind says, best left to those with years of education in practical mechanisms of physics. Because the logical implications of a universe constructed of time, is all about "doing the filing" of memory and programs; and until I can have confirmed information of alternatives, what is observable and in the modestly well established files, is the here-now. Pure math is pure imagination because it's usually derived from the reverse process of analyzed/testable physical structures. Much appreciation for the lectures in establishing the basic Quantum principle of reasoning. _____ The intuitive base from which the observation/cause-effect correspondence of QM-Time amplitude and frequencies modulation has the same "wordless" characteristics as the dimensionless virtual vector projection of temporal superposition, infinite shaping of one connection. So it's possible to draw correspondence between almost any reasonably simple concepts, literally, in time duration terms of pulse-conglomerates of probabilities. Detachment isn't possible in the absolute, only in degree of "axial" superimposed frequencies and "tangential" modules of spacing amplitudes, the methodology and nomenclatures of arrangements that are the reasons for Education in general.
@@robinwarren6924 Absolutely, lol. He's just so fast, and the way he says, "Blah, blah, blah" is hilarious. It's like he's talking about the most basic, obvious thing you could imagine. But, yes, I wish my brain could move trough the material so effortlessly. The man is a genius's genius.
Give this man his Nobel.
Nobels are pretty much finished for theoretical physicists. That being said, he definitely deserves more recognition outside the field.
For theory which is not proved yet?
For a correspondence that may mean nothing in physics, may mean nothing, but is still a such impressive and elegant mathematical solution that may help in a lot of domain, that we don't see yet, but one day may change a lot of things.
@@frankdimeglio8216 based on that bullshit, he didn't.
Or a Fields medal for Pete's sake.
Interesting. You lost me at 0:00
Argentina proud 🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷
I was looking for a recipe for a lemon cake....
A true genius of our time
that moment when he says "Sorry, i've learned with Russian(actually Soviet) books.." 😊
26:20
😂😂
😂😂
vengo por date un vlog,no lo conocia y es una verguenza que este cientifico no sea mas conocido...
Lo mismo jaja
@@lucasmanfredi9069 esta lleno de zombies de clarin...
I guess it's pretty off topic but does anyone know a good site to watch new tv shows online ?
@@forrestlyric6378 porhubb my frend
@Forrest Lyric I use Flixzone. You can find it on google =)
I love this guy
@@frankdimeglio8216 you dont know nothing about quantum gravity
Excellent lectures
I am learning your work in the northern bushes of Canada. Rezlife
It's crazy to have a reason to discourage a universal time standard, for supposing a reality of growing time divergences, especially with gravity as the only excuse. Keeping wavelength constant, together with constant time and space metrics, while letting frequency vary, means initially redshifted light realistically must be light initially slowed by decreased gravity. Same with a passing rumble-strip effect. Light frequency is independent of photon rate, meaning a constant-rate countable photon (or light pulse) source gives the only reliable light-based indicator for time rate. Heisenberg's uncertainty applied to light says a perfectly tight frequency source is a perfectly random phase timing source, so atomic clock frequency means basically nothing about the only good time rate measure, namely photon rate.
Listening to genius in real-time.
An additional AdS/CFT correspondence may be that of the speed of light limitation (CFT) and the Lieb-Robinson limitation (AdS).
FUAAAAAA, JUAN ES UNA EMINENCIA! POR FAVOR TODO LO QUE SABE, ES INCREÍBLE :o
thank you for this video!
what happens when the space around a black hole is expanding faster than the speed of light?
An event horizon
I think the analogy is space is "falling" faster than light is "rising" (analogy of General Relativity)
Супер у меня нет слов
Where can one get the problem sheet, mentioned by Dr. Maldacena, is it published somewhere, maybe there is some course page, dedicated to that past event?
It's arxiv.org
Genioooo....!!!
Does anybody know where to find the exercises he mentioned?
Cool stuff
AdS/CFT is the sheeeezzneeeeettttt!!!
Keep the camera on the physicist. People can pause the video to finish taking notes.
Épico
Made in argentina
Argentina stronk 😁
This shit is nuts no cap
The only coupling applicable to observations, is the general type familiar in musical chords, or, in keeping with the BBT , with a central point connection and radial time-inflation quantum field of fields, ..in the projections of a real-virtual image. It's Information distributed infinitely, in the bits and bytes of the universe, from out of a timing duration QM memory.
Probability one, as it applies to the universal wave, is "counted" and established by the sampling/measurement process of infinite/eternal timing, and allows for the time-reversal counter process of "directional" superposition such that the likelihood of possible states proceeds from one to minus one, in the range/interval from infinity to possible zero at the limits.
In orientation, 1-1=0, 1=1(+/-) probability, corresponds to the Quantum Mechanism +/-, = and "i" at zero coordinates of the universal wave of all orthogonal/omnidirectional superimposed possibility/probability timing combinations/permutations. "Ordinary probability is "contained" continuously within conjugate possibility "condensed" in superposition of harmonic/resonant boundaries of the observable mathematical structure.
If there's to be this logical-mathematical speculation on the mode of representation of the mechanism, I'm not the one to do that because the nomenclature for complex compounded structures is application specific. The course of logic that can stay in contact with the surrounding environment is, as Professor Susskind says, best left to those with years of education in practical mechanisms of physics.
Because the logical implications of a universe constructed of time, is all about "doing the filing" of memory and programs; and until I can have confirmed information of alternatives, what is observable and in the modestly well established files, is the here-now. Pure math is pure imagination because it's usually derived from the reverse process of analyzed/testable physical structures.
Much appreciation for the lectures in establishing the basic Quantum principle of reasoning.
_____
The intuitive base from which the observation/cause-effect correspondence of QM-Time amplitude and frequencies modulation has the same "wordless" characteristics as the dimensionless virtual vector projection of temporal superposition, infinite shaping of one connection. So it's possible to draw correspondence between almost any reasonably simple concepts, literally, in time duration terms of pulse-conglomerates of probabilities. Detachment isn't possible in the absolute, only in degree of "axial" superimposed frequencies and "tangential" modules of spacing amplitudes, the methodology and nomenclatures of arrangements that are the reasons for Education in general.
I feel like you just put a bunch of "science-y" words in a blender with too much vodka for your own amusement
Camera is crap fool
He forgot to carry the one, thus all this is wrong.
Juan is so great, "Blah, blah, blah!"
Jealous?
@@robinwarren6924 Absolutely, lol. He's just so fast, and the way he says, "Blah, blah, blah" is hilarious. It's like he's talking about the most basic, obvious thing you could imagine. But, yes, I wish my brain could move trough the material so effortlessly. The man is a genius's genius.
Ok no more for me not now
Everytime he's saying aaa.. aaa.. aaa.. it's annoying!
shut up
These lectures in general are sketchy as fuck.
Jealous?