I just wanted to say that I have seen most of your early modern European history lectures and you ARE AMAZING. Coming from a University student, I really wish I had you during high school. You're an awesome speaker as well! Thank you!!
Delacroix= Day-la-croy ...sheesh- don't be so anti intellectual. A 3 second internet search provides not only the history of the man, but also a phonetic pronunciation, spelling, origin, and audible sound bite. Rather than apologize for not speaking French, how about a sub-textual lesson on using modern tech to solve little questions. C'mon man!
LOL It's just part of my persona, man. And if I didn't do that, how would I manage to draw out critical comments from you? If not for these, I'd have one less reason to make the videos!
***** Actually, it's pronounced more along the lines of "Du-la-kwah." Maybe you should have researched the actual French pronunciation before posting such an elitist comment. At least he admitted he didn't know how to pronounce it.
cdsmetalhead99 ...and "more along the lines" is such a perfect example of precise and accurate measurement in... what exactly? Try again. I am not impressed. Besides- I am American- not French.
***** "Precise and accurate measurement" is rather difficult to achieve in phonetics. I didn't want to use International Phonetic Alphabet symbols, so I simply typed the approximate pronunciation. You continue to come off as an elitist. It's a French name, so the "American" pronunciation is fundamentally wrong.
@@tomrichey Had a teacher for my social studies in 5th and 6th grade he was the best I ever had, he set the standard, no one else really measured up, had maybe 3 others throughout all of my 14 years in school that were close but never at that level, and if I had you as a teacher I think you would’ve set the new standard !! 💯💯👏👌 love the way you teach and the actual substance that you offer, it’s real information unlike what many of teachers offered me
Historical isms are very interesting and important to know about as they are used today in many inappropriate ways.....Do you think there is a need for a 21st century language to update people’s understanding and education?
Excellent video and breakdown. I particular admired how you detailed the differences between the isms. Also, your thumbnail of Eugène Delacroix's Liberty Leading the People is one of my favorite pieces of art. I have an unhealthy fixation with French history, and pretty much anything French, haha. I've been a subscriber for a month or so, but I'm definitely going to binge on a few of your videos today. Very informative and genuinely entertaining - interactive teaching style. 👍👌
Andy Woods An honor! I'm sure my own students would find it funny that anyone would ever binge watch my lectures. I'm sure your French pronunciation is a bit better than mine!
Haha I was falling asleep and your scream right before Socialism awoke me. Such a helpful video though- i printed out your outline and it's helped me so much to understand all of this for the AP exam! Thank you!!
You are amazing. I wish the teachers here would put so much effort to helping their students as you do. Videos, web pages, study materials? This is incredible. You'd never see that in Czech republic. The most we can hope for is a list of recommended books to read. Sometimes not even that. I hope your students appreciate all that you do. Stay excellent and cheers from the heart of Europe! ;)
Just finished viewing a couple of your mini lectures, "Congress of Vienna" and "19th Century Ism's". Both of which were quite good. I may be premature in judging but you are quite "secular" in your presentations. Do you discuss the role of religion anywhere?
I teach from a secular perspective but have a series on the Protestant Reformation that you might like. Also check out my videos on Romanticism, Deism, and the Second Great Awakening. Religion, theology, and the role of religion in society are actually topics of great interest to me! I plan to tackle the First Great Awakening sometime in the next few months.
Tom Richey I will check them out. I have taught some World History Surveys and American History Surveys in community college. I enjoyed your presentations and look forward to viewing some more. I love history.
Could u please compare and contrast the meaning of the same terms as they stand in usa and canada now. And what brought about the change . Can make the same tabular columns to make it clear. U explain very well. But it’s very confusing to understand what they meant in 19 th cent uk without any real context to what they mean now. U said forget eberyth8ng u know about the, in contemporary context but that impossible to do cognitively speaking . On the contrary the way we engage with these words are going to be activated immediately
Just watched this...nice title, nice concept, very enlightening. My favorite part was where you were like, "what good that did i don't know, but i guess it made people feel better about themselves" Lol All in all this was a good mix of education and entertainment.
Conservatives 'backward looking'? Like the American revolution? Who passed Britain’s reform acts / introducing democracy? Was France more democratic than Britain in the 19th century? (Kids: no)
You are the best teacher I have ever come across in my life and I have a PhD!!! I mean all those tome and long lectures at Unis are kinda rubbish and time -wasting 😅
Tom Richey Well, I don't know, u'd have to talk to ur wife about that, she's the only lady whose appreciation u would need, plus maybe ur Mom, grandmom, daughter?, etc.
Marx was not a communist. He described capitalism and its effects on workers, namely exploitation of labor. He was closer to a socialist, describing socialism as the state inbetween capitalism and communism., where communism is defined as a utopian classless society. I will not disagree with your other generalities about private property and the controlling the means of production.
9:27 I got this wrong on the test. And the answer was Liberalism. The reason why Liberalism would be similar(which is why it was the correct answer) is because Liberalism is
Your videos are fantastic. I'm in my first year of a History degree and I'm finding these videos really useful in giving me the in-depth context I need to understand all my reading, the format is just great, so easy to follow yet not over-simplified! Thank you!
French is my first language and we don't care how you pronounce Delacroix, it sounds like "The-law-crow-ah" or "The-law-crew-ah" and translate to "From-the-cross", but still, no one cares.
The side that has money and power is always correct and moral. And the have nots are always wrong. I want to become rich and powerful so that people will believe me when I talk a load of bullshit.
People like to talk of it like it's political ideology but really it's economics. Socialism is the underlying economic structure and words like Communism and Fascism are peculiar variants of it. Communism being where the government outright owns everything and directs all resources as they see fit, whereas in Fascism the government doesn't legally own everything but they have the de facto power to intervene and effectively control all as if they owned it. The key defining principle for both is that the government can exert ownership over everything in the realm, and that is Socialism. What Dora said is just an example of what some Socialists may try to do with this power, but others may have different agendas, like total war. It gets confusing because the distinction is more of a modern development, Marx himself never distinguished between Socialism and Communism, he actually used both terms interchangeably. Probably the only real distinction today is that Socialists pretend to keep the idea of Private Property whereas Communists have always explicitly sought to eliminate it altogether.
9:42 Hello Tom, if I may say, the french do not pronounce the final consonants of their words. Delacroix is pronounced Delacroi or Delacroy . A common example of this in America is the automotive brand Chevrolet. Your videos are always helpful; I wish you well.
+Robert Rowland You've been around here long enough to know of my longstanding hate/hate relationship with French pronunciation... I'm starting to be more cognizant in my more recent videos as my audience has grown more global. When I was teaching an audience of 90% Americans, we could all not give a $%*& about French pronunciation together, but now, I'm seeking more pronunciation advice before dabbling in French history...
Tom Richey Congratulations on having an ever expanding audience. You deserve it. I'm sure you could find one on your own but perhaps this will help. www.collinsdictionary.com/words-and-language/learning-languages/learning-french/french-pronunciation-guide,16,HCB.html
+Robert Rowland Actually, Tom is pronouncing Delacroix correctly. You are correct in saying that the French do not pronounce the final consonants. In french the "oi" sound is pronounced with a "wah" sound. For example, the word for me, moi, is said like "mwah"
Tom Richey Vivian J set me straight. I was wrong in my assertion that you were pronouncing Delacroix incorrectly. I'm sorry to have done so. I will try to learn from my mistake.
Bullshitism and Confusionism, we need to add those as well, because all these isms are rubbish there is no standard definition of anything I think, it is Politicism which tries to make them all sounding so different. Thanks anyways for the insights from your point of view.
None of the conventional "isms" address the fundamental imbalance between human and property rights associated with access to and control over nature. In terms of labor and capital goods, nature has a zero cost of production. Nature is provided to humans as a commons for our use and survival. Almost alone among the great political and economic thinkers, the American Henry George presented a cogent argument for a labor and capital goods basis for private property. Nature is, George argued, the source from which all wealth is produced. Thus, nature is the source of private wealth but is not legitimately to be treated as private wealth. The ideal structure for accessing any part of nature is under a competitive bidding system for a leasehold interest issued by the community or society. Note, therefore, that government acts as the agent of the community and society for administering such a system. As deeds to nature had already become a widespread norm, Henry George argued that a second-best approach was for government to collect from every "owner" (i.e., deedholder) of land the full potential annual rental value of any location privately held. Henry George went on to include in his definition of "land" all natural assets with an inelastic supply, such as frequencies on the broadcast spectrum or take-off and landing slots at airports. Laws adopted by communities that restricted competition also result in income that is unearned and is, therefore, appropriately capture as public revenue. These sources of revenue would serve as the fund with which to pay for democratically agreed upon public goods and services, with the potential for an annual citizen's dividend to be distributed. The principles embraced by Henry George and developed in his books, addresses and articles have a long history. Many other thoughtful analysts reached similar conclusions. The term that best describes these principles is, I suggest, "cooperative individualism". Edward J. Dodson, Director School of Cooperative Individualism www.cooperative-individualism.org
Tom, did you attend PLNU? I see you drinking from a Point Loma Mug in your 19th Century Isms Video from Feb 14, 2015. I am a PLNU grad and only in my 3rd year teaching AP Euro at Sage Creek High School in Carlsbad, CA. I love your stuff man. R Lewis Cordell
You are a genius, but that doesn't matter if you don't share it. BUT YOU SHARE IT A LOT and its great. Thank you so much for all your hard work. I still can't believe you do all that just to help ppl out. Thanks again!
The Sorrows of Young Werther, by Goethe, actually don't belong to Romanticism. Goethe has never been part of Romanticism but of the "Sturm und Drang" ! Very good video though, thanks a lot !
Could've mentioned that the guy who wrote "The Sorrows of Young Werther" was Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, who is considered to be Germanys national poet/writer.
Of course socialism is the redheaded stepchild, what other color hair would it have? Ha. Anyway, you did a really good job on explaining each one of these ideas. As a socialist myself, I am glad to see my ideology represented honestly, and it's good to see some well made and educational videos on the Internet.
6:18 ... Hmmmmm is that true ... I would say conservatism also believes in God given rights, only they believe God gave certain people more rights than others. Monarchs were seen as people who rule because of 'divine right': en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_right_of_kings Also: you say liberalism doesnt mix well with romanticism, but the 'natural rights' part mixes really well with romanticism.
As far as historical discourse is concerned, natural rights theory as we know it is diametrically opposed to the theory of the Divine Right of Kings. As for the isms, there can never be a hard and fast rule in all cases but 19th century liberals' support for industrialization fundamentally alienated them from romantics.
Tom Richey About that there is no hard and fast rule: I guess so. About: natural rights vs Divine Right, I didn't say it was the same thing, I said that both some liberals and some conservatives both claim their ideas of rights & priviliges are 'God given'.
But by the 19th century, the idea of Divine Right had pretty much lost currency entirely even among the upper classes. The idea of inherited rights and of the necessity of social stability and preservation of the status quo were much more influential ideas in the 19th century. Divine Right was more of a 17th century construct.
They do! We're all in this fight together. On the morning of the AP Euro exam, I will be doing a live review and I hope you and your class will tune in!
Good explanations of the main conceptions of these ideologies and how they stood in the 19th century political scene. However as libertarian socialist I was slightly irked about the notion that socialism was that the group is more important than the individual in the sense that the individual doesn't matter (that seems more like a fascist, ultra-nationalist conception); rather I conceive of socialism as each individual is just as important as one another, and co-operating in society is the best way of ensuring that everyone has the means to a free and full development of themselves. Of course, it might be possible I'm merely inferring meaning in this regard where there wasn't any intended. Plus it did seem that JS Mill dabbled into socialist beliefs (policies) as a means of ensuring each has access to their liberty (If I recall correctly, at some point he advocated workplace democracy, worker self-management, and government funding for education albeit in a comparable form to contemporary private school vouchers).
Republicans are not Radical if you believe so then I have the right to say Democrat's are super radical because they're the only ones burning buildings and looting.
+ MrGiggity890 Libertarianism is actually a rebranded classical liberalism, a more economically oriented version you might say. While in Europe, in the 19th century and still today, the term "libertarian" is used in the context of socialism, to refer to the anti-statist currents such as anarcho-communism.
You've totally saved my grade on the AP Euro exam, but there's just one thing. Around 3:50 you say that liberalism comes from a Greek root when in fact liberty is traced back to Latin with "libertas". Not that it really matters, but meh
I love your videos on AP euro! Seriously, you're one of the reasons i'm passing that class! Can you please cover the 1848 revolutions? Thank you in advance! (:
Thank you for that scream. I got distracted and you called me back.
It's 11:30 right now, I was actually nodding off there, that woke me up at the best time!
I just wanted to say that I have seen most of your early modern European history lectures and you ARE AMAZING. Coming from a University student, I really wish I had you during high school. You're an awesome speaker as well! Thank you!!
+elf15a Thanks so much! I appreciate the encouragement.
Did I just see a Tom Richey ad on a Tom Richey video LOL
Was studying now I’m bout to watch a Matt Damon movie, damn it
DARK SATANIC MILLS HAHAHAHAH
Delacroix= Day-la-croy ...sheesh- don't be so anti intellectual. A 3 second internet search provides not only the history of the man, but also a phonetic pronunciation, spelling, origin, and audible sound bite.
Rather than apologize for not speaking French, how about a sub-textual lesson on using modern tech to solve little questions.
C'mon man!
LOL It's just part of my persona, man. And if I didn't do that, how would I manage to draw out critical comments from you? If not for these, I'd have one less reason to make the videos!
Wow, that was very rude of you Hiway
***** Actually, it's pronounced more along the lines of "Du-la-kwah." Maybe you should have researched the actual French pronunciation before posting such an elitist comment. At least he admitted he didn't know how to pronounce it.
cdsmetalhead99
...and "more along the lines" is such a perfect example of precise and accurate measurement in... what exactly? Try again. I am not impressed. Besides- I am American- not French.
***** "Precise and accurate measurement" is rather difficult to achieve in phonetics. I didn't want to use International Phonetic Alphabet symbols, so I simply typed the approximate pronunciation. You continue to come off as an elitist. It's a French name, so the "American" pronunciation is fundamentally wrong.
Timestamps:
Conservatism- 1:45
Liberalism- 3:33
Romanticism- 8:03
Nationalism- 10:35
Socialism- 14:43
Feminism- 21:18
ty!
you're a god amongst men
appreciate my guy
I’m forever grateful for the people who put time stamps
You are 30x better than my AP Euro teacher, and my high school costs 30k annually.......just saying
Only 30k? Ew 🤢 try 40
My Ap Euro teacher presents like he's bored
My teacher is a god among men, my condolences
If only all my history teachers made history as interesting as you make it.
Those are kind words. I hope I can continue to hold your attention!
@@tomrichey Had a teacher for my social studies in 5th and 6th grade he was the best I ever had, he set the standard, no one else really measured up, had maybe 3 others throughout all of my 14 years in school that were close but never at that level, and if I had you as a teacher I think you would’ve set the new standard !! 💯💯👏👌 love the way you teach and the actual substance that you offer, it’s real information unlike what many of teachers offered me
are you matt damon?
haha! perhaps his twin.
Josh Brolin more like
This channel is the savior to my AP Euro history career.
So cool that this lecturer got Matt Damon to teach this class in a Southern Accent
You yelled just as I turned up my volume, you got me. I bow to you, sir.
HA!
Historical isms are very interesting and important to know about as they are used today in many inappropriate ways.....Do you think there is a need for a 21st century language to update people’s understanding and education?
Excellent video and breakdown. I particular admired how you detailed the differences between the isms.
Also, your thumbnail of Eugène Delacroix's Liberty Leading the People is one of my favorite pieces of art. I have an unhealthy fixation with French history, and pretty much anything French, haha.
I've been a subscriber for a month or so, but I'm definitely going to binge on a few of your videos today. Very informative and genuinely entertaining - interactive teaching style. 👍👌
Andy Woods An honor! I'm sure my own students would find it funny that anyone would ever binge watch my lectures. I'm sure your French pronunciation is a bit better than mine!
The history of the European nation-states is that of linguistic communities serving their trade needs
Haha I was falling asleep and your scream right before Socialism awoke me. Such a helpful video though- i printed out your outline and it's helped me so much to understand all of this for the AP exam! Thank you!!
am i the only one impressed by the camera quality right now!!! like this is from 2015 🤯!!!
You are amazing. I wish the teachers here would put so much effort to helping their students as you do. Videos, web pages, study materials? This is incredible. You'd never see that in Czech republic. The most we can hope for is a list of recommended books to read. Sometimes not even that. I hope your students appreciate all that you do. Stay excellent and cheers from the heart of Europe! ;)
14:21 Thanks I did almost fall asleep!
:( I was wearing headphones
+Myldred Hdez me toooo omg
Ugh the euro test is tomorrow and I’m so bad at the isms. This is gonna go poorly 😫
Cramming? Me too :')
Just finished viewing a couple of your mini lectures, "Congress of Vienna" and "19th Century Ism's". Both of which were quite good. I may be premature in judging but you are quite "secular" in your presentations. Do you discuss the role of religion anywhere?
I teach from a secular perspective but have a series on the Protestant Reformation that you might like. Also check out my videos on Romanticism, Deism, and the Second Great Awakening. Religion, theology, and the role of religion in society are actually topics of great interest to me! I plan to tackle the First Great Awakening sometime in the next few months.
Tom Richey I will check them out. I have taught some World History Surveys and American History Surveys in community college. I enjoyed your presentations and look forward to viewing some more. I love history.
RIP headphone users during the socialism part
I liked how you scared us all just before you began with Socialism. Hahah :)
7:37 lmao this dude did the snap before Thanos even did
None of this shit has anything to do with camping.
And if you are in My Camp you will learn Fire Safety or burn.
So keep that in mind...Pooooffff
I like ur teaching style it’s kind of narrative not boring at all
Could u please compare and contrast the meaning of the same terms as they stand in usa and canada now. And what brought about the change . Can make the same tabular columns to make it clear.
U explain very well. But it’s very confusing to understand what they meant in 19 th cent uk without any real context to what they mean now. U said forget eberyth8ng u know about the, in contemporary context but that impossible to do cognitively speaking . On the contrary the way we engage with these words are going to be activated immediately
Just watched this...nice title, nice concept, very enlightening. My favorite part was where you were like, "what good that did i don't know, but i guess it made people feel better about themselves" Lol All in all this was a good mix of education and entertainment.
Conservatives 'backward looking'? Like the American revolution? Who passed Britain’s reform acts / introducing democracy? Was France more democratic than Britain in the 19th century? (Kids: no)
jesus christ tom u actually scared me LOL
+Jillian Villa LOL Thanks?
You are the best teacher I have ever come across in my life and I have a PhD!!! I mean all those tome and long lectures at Unis are kinda rubbish and time -wasting 😅
I’m the 247th comment
and there is 274k views
im a comment
And you’re watching my channel 24/7!
@@tomrichey I DIDNT EVEN THINK ABOUT THAT HAHA
@@tomrichey do you mind if I edit my comment to put that in
Just busting ur chops but how come "feminism" is last on ur list of "isms"? Totally kidding, good overview & helpful, thank u.
Actually, there is a reason for this, as I added feminism to an original list of five isms. I add the ladies and they still don't appreciate me! Haha
Tom Richey Well, I don't know, u'd have to talk to ur wife about that, she's the only lady whose appreciation u would need, plus maybe ur Mom, grandmom, daughter?, etc.
Marx was not a communist. He described capitalism and its effects on workers, namely exploitation of labor. He was closer to a socialist, describing socialism as the state inbetween capitalism and communism., where communism is defined as a utopian classless society. I will not disagree with your other generalities about private property and the controlling the means of production.
No. Stop. Stop scrolling the comments. Go back up to the video and pay attention, you failing student.
I was really falling asleep at 14:21 HAHAHAHAHA. My AP Euro Test is today, so I really appreciated the scream
9:27 I got this wrong on the test. And the answer was Liberalism. The reason why Liberalism would be similar(which is why it was the correct answer) is because Liberalism is
Your videos are fantastic. I'm in my first year of a History degree and I'm finding these videos really useful in giving me the in-depth context I need to understand all my reading, the format is just great, so easy to follow yet not over-simplified! Thank you!
French is my first language and we don't care how you pronounce Delacroix, it sounds like "The-law-crow-ah" or "The-law-crew-ah" and translate to "From-the-cross", but still, no one cares.
Bien dit hahaha
I knew it was coming, but it still scared me...
I actually did fall asleep on the couch watching this and you going “WAH” woke me up 😂
The side that has money and power is always correct and moral. And the have nots are always wrong.
I want to become rich and powerful so that people will believe me when I talk a load of bullshit.
*Thanks for watching and play Show the Video*
💞💞💞💞💞
I genuinely got scared with that scream
un capo Pereyra
I had to watch this video during my class.
and i'm in SEVENTH grade
@@sanjeev8718 did i ask?
hello mr.Richey I was wondering: what is the main difference between socialism and communism? thanks for your videos they're really helpful !
+Timothy Motte I was wondering the same thing
People like to talk of it like it's political ideology but really it's economics.
Socialism is the underlying economic structure and words like Communism and Fascism are peculiar variants of it. Communism being where the government outright owns everything and directs all resources as they see fit, whereas in Fascism the government doesn't legally own everything but they have the de facto power to intervene and effectively control all as if they owned it.
The key defining principle for both is that the government can exert ownership over everything in the realm, and that is Socialism. What Dora said is just an example of what some Socialists may try to do with this power, but others may have different agendas, like total war. It gets confusing because the distinction is more of a modern development, Marx himself never distinguished between Socialism and Communism, he actually used both terms interchangeably. Probably the only real distinction today is that Socialists pretend to keep the idea of Private Property whereas Communists have always explicitly sought to eliminate it altogether.
Welcome Mr. Shilaty's class. Just saying hi
How do you square Hegel as a nationalist since Marx was a young Hegelian?
9:42 Hello Tom, if I may say, the french do not pronounce the final consonants of their words. Delacroix is pronounced Delacroi or Delacroy . A common example of this in America is the automotive brand Chevrolet.
Your videos are always helpful; I wish you well.
+Robert Rowland You've been around here long enough to know of my longstanding hate/hate relationship with French pronunciation... I'm starting to be more cognizant in my more recent videos as my audience has grown more global. When I was teaching an audience of 90% Americans, we could all not give a $%*& about French pronunciation together, but now, I'm seeking more pronunciation advice before dabbling in French history...
Tom Richey Congratulations on having an ever expanding audience. You deserve it. I'm sure you could find one on your own but perhaps this will help.
www.collinsdictionary.com/words-and-language/learning-languages/learning-french/french-pronunciation-guide,16,HCB.html
+Robert Rowland Actually, Tom is pronouncing Delacroix correctly. You are correct in saying that the French do not pronounce the final consonants. In french the "oi" sound is pronounced with a "wah" sound. For example, the word for me, moi, is said like "mwah"
Vivian J. Upon looking into it (a thing I should have done initially), much to my chagrin, I find my assumption was indeed incorrect; my bad.
Tom Richey Vivian J set me straight. I was wrong in my assertion that you were pronouncing Delacroix incorrectly. I'm sorry to have done so. I will try to learn from my mistake.
That yell actually scared me
did i ask?
Bullshitism and Confusionism, we need to add those as well, because all these isms are rubbish there is no standard definition of anything I think, it is Politicism which tries to make them all sounding so different. Thanks anyways for the insights from your point of view.
No ism can exist without the other ism. Take my word. So differentiating all the isms is like nonsensism, there is only one ism that is politicism.
Your yell was more scary than socialism,,😉
None of the conventional "isms" address the fundamental imbalance between human and property rights associated with access to and control over nature. In terms of labor and capital goods, nature has a zero cost of production. Nature is provided to humans as a commons for our use and survival.
Almost alone among the great political and economic thinkers, the American Henry George presented a cogent argument for a labor and capital goods basis for private property. Nature is, George argued, the source from which all wealth is produced. Thus, nature is the source of private wealth but is not legitimately to be treated as private wealth. The ideal structure for accessing any part of nature is under a competitive bidding system for a leasehold interest issued by the community or society. Note, therefore, that government acts as the agent of the community and society for administering such a system.
As deeds to nature had already become a widespread norm, Henry George argued that a second-best approach was for government to collect from every "owner" (i.e., deedholder) of land the full potential annual rental value of any location privately held.
Henry George went on to include in his definition of "land" all natural assets with an inelastic supply, such as frequencies on the broadcast spectrum or take-off and landing slots at airports. Laws adopted by communities that restricted competition also result in income that is unearned and is, therefore, appropriately capture as public revenue.
These sources of revenue would serve as the fund with which to pay for democratically agreed upon public goods and services, with the potential for an annual citizen's dividend to be distributed.
The principles embraced by Henry George and developed in his books, addresses and articles have a long history. Many other thoughtful analysts reached similar conclusions. The term that best describes these principles is, I suggest, "cooperative individualism".
Edward J. Dodson, Director
School of Cooperative Individualism
www.cooperative-individualism.org
Tom, did you attend PLNU? I see you drinking from a Point Loma Mug in your 19th Century Isms Video from Feb 14, 2015.
I am a PLNU grad and only in my 3rd year teaching AP Euro at Sage Creek High School in Carlsbad, CA.
I love your stuff man.
R Lewis Cordell
You are a genius, but that doesn't matter if you don't share it. BUT YOU SHARE IT A LOT and its great. Thank you so much for all your hard work. I still can't believe you do all that just to help ppl out. Thanks again!
The Sorrows of Young Werther, by Goethe, actually don't belong to Romanticism. Goethe has never been part of Romanticism but of the "Sturm und Drang" !
Very good video though, thanks a lot !
I Love of the European History.
Could've mentioned that the guy who wrote "The Sorrows of Young Werther" was Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, who is considered to be Germanys national poet/writer.
Of course socialism is the redheaded stepchild, what other color hair would it have? Ha. Anyway, you did a really good job on explaining each one of these ideas. As a socialist myself, I am glad to see my ideology represented honestly, and it's good to see some well made and educational videos on the Internet.
you sound just like Theo Vaughn
@Tom Richey Thank you so much for the video. We love you at Stuyvesant High School in New York!
The Thesis-Anthesis-Synthesis model of dialectics is from Fichte, not Hegel. Common mistake.
Hey Tom, was the Nationalism of the early 20th century the equivalent to that of the 19th century?
Thank you jewish people
Echo was like Charles Dickens disgruntled voice at industrial revolution.
bro i almost DIED tom richey omg he rly had to do me like that huh
I read the comments about your scream but I didn;]'t catch it but when I went back I still got scared
Thanks soo much for this!!
My pleasure! Glad the video helped you. :D
six isms = s..x isms = s..xisms = sexisms
OH
who else here watching this because of quarantine and needing to still get the education?
who else is here the day before the test?
Glad you didn't do 'capitalism', which is not a true ism as it's not a philosophy. 'Capitalism' is a word created by its detractors.
It is an Economic Philosophy
@@stephenheath8465 the free market (or capitalism if you prefer) does not have a 'higher up' or central authority.
When Feminist need to actually check their history to understand what they are doing NOW isn't justified.
6:18 ... Hmmmmm is that true ... I would say conservatism also believes in God given rights, only they believe God gave certain people more rights than others. Monarchs were seen as people who rule because of 'divine right': en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_right_of_kings
Also: you say liberalism doesnt mix well with romanticism, but the 'natural rights' part mixes really well with romanticism.
As far as historical discourse is concerned, natural rights theory as we know it is diametrically opposed to the theory of the Divine Right of Kings.
As for the isms, there can never be a hard and fast rule in all cases but 19th century liberals' support for industrialization fundamentally alienated them from romantics.
Tom Richey About that there is no hard and fast rule: I guess so.
About: natural rights vs Divine Right, I didn't say it was the same thing, I said that both some liberals and some conservatives both claim their ideas of rights & priviliges are 'God given'.
But by the 19th century, the idea of Divine Right had pretty much lost currency entirely even among the upper classes. The idea of inherited rights and of the necessity of social stability and preservation of the status quo were much more influential ideas in the 19th century. Divine Right was more of a 17th century construct.
Tom Richey Ah ok, you have a point there.
The civil war wasn’t about states rights
What was it really about ?
creative method to compare these -isms. thanks
Where is communism
DARK SATANIC MILLS
is most of this video him talking about his stuff and politics and his coffee. I felt like I wasted time with the first part of this video
do your students take the final ap exam on may 8th as well?
They do! We're all in this fight together. On the morning of the AP Euro exam, I will be doing a live review and I hope you and your class will tune in!
Tom Richey What time? I'll try to convince my teacher to let us watch!
Please come to L.D. Bell High School
7:39 did he predict Infinity War?
superb ... very helpful
thanks man
10:15 my guy 😂
Oh yeah, mr Gutt
Good explanations of the main conceptions of these ideologies and how they stood in the 19th century political scene. However as libertarian socialist I was slightly irked about the notion that socialism was that the group is more important than the individual in the sense that the individual doesn't matter (that seems more like a fascist, ultra-nationalist conception); rather I conceive of socialism as each individual is just as important as one another, and co-operating in society is the best way of ensuring that everyone has the means to a free and full development of themselves.
Of course, it might be possible I'm merely inferring meaning in this regard where there wasn't any intended.
Plus it did seem that JS Mill dabbled into socialist beliefs (policies) as a means of ensuring each has access to their liberty (If I recall correctly, at some point he advocated workplace democracy, worker self-management, and government funding for education albeit in a comparable form to contemporary private school vouchers).
You don’t see a diamond in the minute 2:34
YES SIR!!
10:27 *DARK SATANIC MILLS*
Thank u genius instructor
You didn't mention radical republicans!
Republicans are not Radical if you believe so then I have the right to say Democrat's are super radical because they're the only ones burning buildings and looting.
@@davidmoore5004 I didn’t mean American republicans but European ones
@Bridget McNaughton Wasn’t talking about American politics
looked down at my phone right as you screamed lmao
14:20 The Not-So-Red Scare
you actually scared me.
that yell got me! hah
classical liberalism sounds quite similar to libertarianism
+ MrGiggity890
Libertarianism is actually a rebranded classical liberalism, a more economically oriented version you might say. While in Europe, in the 19th century and still today, the term "libertarian" is used in the context of socialism, to refer to the anti-statist currents such as anarcho-communism.
You've totally saved my grade on the AP Euro exam, but there's just one thing. Around 3:50 you say that liberalism comes from a Greek root when in fact liberty is traced back to Latin with "libertas". Not that it really matters, but meh
I love your videos on AP euro! Seriously, you're one of the reasons i'm passing that class! Can you please cover the 1848 revolutions? Thank you in advance! (:
manaphyangel I'll add it to my list. Glad I'm helping you to be successful in AP Euro!