@@MrDarkElement in reality, amalekites never exist. There is no any reference that these people ever exist. Even egyptian and assyrian incripstion never mention about the existence of amalekites. Also, german historian hugo winkler found no evidence that these biblical people ever exist.
Egypt was not ruling over Canaan in the same sense that they were in mainland Egypt. Egypt had a few settlements in Canaan just to collect taxes and see that the pharaoh got support from Canaanite tribes. After Israel fled east across the Red Sea and wandered in the wilderness, Egyptian power started to wane. A group of unspecified warrior tribes called the "Sea Peoples" popped up on the northeastern tip of Egypt and pushed them out of Canaan, even attempting invasion. After Egypt lost power in Canaan, the Israelites moved in to Canaan from the east. The only way Egypt would be able to push Israel out would be to go up along the Mediterranean, through the Sea Peoples north of Israel, and then circle back southward to attack Israel. It makes no sense to assume that Egypt would be strong enough to drive out Israel, yet not strong enough to defend against the "Sea Peoples".
Yes, "critical archeology". The same "critical archeology" that said for decades that the Hittites did not exist. The fact that they find Cannaite/phonecian idols in Jewish areas does not dis prove the Bible, as the Bible tells us that: 1) they lived next to each other and 2) That some Israelites were worshiping these idols and subsequently punished by God. How they don not know this as studied scientists is either they need to study more or they have a bias against the Judaeo Christian belief.
@@Drakemiser The denial of the Hittites is interesting, but archaeological evidence changed opinion accordingly. Around that same time most historians accepted the Bible as mostly accurate, archaeology changed that. That's the same for here. There is plenty of evidence for a Canaanite origin for the Israelites, barely any for the scale and origin of the Exodus narrative
@@ManiacMayhem7256 There is evidence of the Exodus right down to a mountain topped with black rocks. These rocks are only black on the top, but when turned over, are as grey as the surrounding rocks meaning they wouldn't be volcanic, and even if they were, there is no known volcano any where near it. The mount is called Jabal El Laws or Mountain of Laws to the locals. Near it are 12 wells, still in existence today. Near that is a huge stone with water erosion and a dry, eroded creek bed with obvious erosion. But these places aren't studied except for a few rouge geologist for 1)the Saudis have made them off limits. 2)political upheaval in the area. There were also two pillars found on either side of the Red Sea. One had had it's insertions washed off, but the other showed inscriptions of these cylinders being erected by Solomon in remembrance of the Exodus and crossing of the Red Sea. A lot of this stuff has become uninteresting to scientists because they are secular; you don't study what you don't believe or care about. But they are there. There is evidence of chariots at the bottom of the Red Sea. There are sulfur balls(white sulfur which is rare in nature) around un excavated ziggurats that fit the Sodom narrative. There is an Egyptian stele representing Joseph and possibly Ephraim. There is a lot of evidence; you just have to want to find it. And with the internet, it's not hard.
@@ManiacMayhem7256 Geologists also said Pilot, David, and Isaiah didn't exist. That is until they found the Pilot stele. And just recently a seal of the prophet Isaiah and a metal--copper I believe--stele about The House of David. These are recent--like this year--finds, but you won't hear about them in the news because they don't care and really don't want anything Godly to be true. Isaiah from the 8th century BC!! And writings about David from the 11th century!! Any other find like this would be huge news, but not findings related to the living God. It's a shame. We're talking about artifacts before or around the time of the founding of Rome.
this is old and outdated there is plenty of evidence that recent archeologists have discovered. If you go by when the Israelites say they conquered Cannan then it lines up. If you decided they come later then it doesnt line up.
The problem is that the evidence still doesn’t make sense because the walls would have fallen 100 years before it was said to have happened in the Bible
Why would God give them 10 commandments not 11 or 9. If the commandment said, thou shall not kill, why would God tell them to kill everyone in a battle.
@@Spontaneous0rder so if my imaginary friend who you don't see or believe in tells me to take my family to your house kill you and your family and take your house what is that called???
@@applesmangos7774 LOL... worship a guy getting crucified and a God that demands and favours child sacrifice... The entire planet has had enough of that crap...
It tells you in the bible that they did not wipe them all and god was mad. When people says gods loves everyone. In the bible he clearly did not. Many time he flat out says when he doesn’t like someone or a group of people. For instance. Jacob I have loved but Esau I have hated. Same with Cain and Able. He excepted all of Able’s offerings but not Cain’s. When he doesn’t hear from able for awhile. He questions his Whereabouts. The Israelites was supposed to be the dominant rulers. I truly believe that God wanted to wipe out curtain nations that would’ve pose a threat to the Israelites later on. However. The Israelites didn’t do all that was commanded of them and spared some Canaanites. Those who were spared eventually some married into the Israelites. The Israelites were never Canaanites. But the Canaanites were absorb into Israelites cultures. It also says that Canaanites would never forget what the Israelites did. There would be a time when the descendants of the surviving Canaanites. Those who did not married into the Israelites would seek revenge.
In the Garden the snake who was Lucifer had sex with Eve giving birth to Cain but even before that took place Lilith Adams first wife who also had sex with Lucifer gave birth to the Asian races that's why Asian people worship the dragon who is Lucifer.
Why else do you think Yahushua called the Pharisees vipers and literal offspring of the devil? He even further said that just like Lucifer was a thieve, murderer and a liar so too would his offspring be just like him
@@InvisibleThings-pn5kc I think this has very spiritual repercussions for the state of gods children. Will they be Canaanite or an Israelite. They have the choice to make
I wonder if the period when those empires in the Mediterranean region collapsed, coincided with something like a pole shift, a shift in Earth's axis, a change in the core's rotation, etc, etc. How can one explain such a widespread fall of large, developed civilizations, without considering some Earth-altering event?....OR, "Those Earthlings are getting too uppity. Fire up the 'Bull of Heaven!' "
seems kinda silly to dismiss the invasion of Canaan just because the Bible affirms it. Saying there was an earth-altering event with no evidence whatsoever is crazy to me
@@bliots8369 The Bible has nothing to do with it. The alleged date of the Israelite invasion of Canaan is 1406 B.C, the Bronze Age Collapse began about 200 years later. However, there's archaeological evidence that the occupation of Canaan was peaceful. Also, at that time, Palestine was an Egyptian possession. It's doubtful the Israelites wanted to go to war against Egypt.
@@Pootycat8359 I think there’s a lot more evidence of an invasion than there is of a peaceful migration. Israel would not have gone to war with Egypt when taking over Canaan because Egypt was not ruling over Canaan in the same sense that they were in mainland Egypt. Egypt had a few settlements in Canaan just to collect taxes and see that the pharaoh got support from Canaanite tribes. After Israel fled east across the Red Sea and wandered in the wilderness, Egyptian power started to wane. A group of unspecified war tribes called "Sea Peoples" popped up on the northeastern tip of Egypt and pushed them out of Canaan, even attempting invasion. After Egypt lost power in Canaan, the Israelites moved in to Canaan from the east. The only way Egypt would be able to push Israel out would be to go up along the Mediterranean, through the “Sea Peoples” north of Israel, and then circle back southward to attack Israel. It makes no sense to assume that Egypt would be strong enough to drive out Israel, yet not strong enough to defend against the "Sea Peoples".
@@bliots8369You are just oblivious of history. Egypt , the 18th and 19th dynasty had their army garrisoned in Canaan for campaigns against Hittites. Those fleeing Israelites would be walking straight into those army's hands, if you take the biblical time of Moses. They would be annihilated , especially, if their Pharaoh' s first born was killed by these immigrants God. And a pharoah would' nt be daft enough to follow an escaping slaves through a sea bed, when he can encircle them through north, when Suez canal was non existent.
"The Lord commanded them to march " Also, to kill (a close relative) to test your loyalty to the lord. The latter is not referring to an opponent in war, it's during peacetime. Pure barbarism. Christianity is a horrible and barbaric story as well ending in a bloody mess. Although it never orders murder and usurpation like judaism and islam, it indirectly orders the conquering of lands by telling people to preach the gospel to the world. Which it did (starting in Europe). As with Islam and judaism it was used as a premise to steal land. Thout shoult not steal, only take in my name
Assyrian Christians had a massive presence in the east spreading the word and without any military force but of course were then largely wiped out by Tamerlane.
@@palsyr4307 I was thinking more about the colonising of the americas and all the rest....They had to convert everyone and justified taking their land as the word of god. Exactly like the Jews and Muslims did (although jews don't care about converting anyone not being a missionary religion) because it's the same malevolent, revengeful, murderous god isn't it?
@@alexxela8956 Perhaps or some vengeful murderous zealots self projecting what they think god is like (whether or not god exists.) The reason why Jews don't go around converting people anymore is because after John Hyrcanus forced converted Arabs and the neighboring Canaanite speaking people in Jordan to fight against the Greeks, the converts ended up behaving zealous as well to prove themselves among the Judeans and this I believe is what ultimately planted the seeds for inter-Abrahamic sectarian divisions that we see today because the Judean Jews and forced converted Arab Jews never really got along well and if you're an Arab but your "holy" book says you are a casted out child of a slave woman, you might get real offended and join a religion more welcoming to an Arab. Or if you're a Hellenistic Jew or Syrian Aramean/Assyrian, maybe Christianity would have appealed to you. If you were an orthodox Jew in Judah, you would have preferred Judaism. If you were a Samaritan rejected by Rabbinic Judaism, you probably would have remained a Samaritan
@@alexxela8956 No...you are referring to yahweh, yahweh is NOT our creator, yahweh is a virgin eating dragon😉 Search it on YT, youll see! Our creator is not mean or vengeful, that is clearly yahweh! If you're interested, look into the GOOD GOD channel, or 9Nania, they both break it down very well! If not, that's your choice, we're all entitled to our own choices(although I don't know for how much longer we will)! Either way, I Hope you have a wonderful, fulfilling day 💗
@@palsyr4307 I never knew all of this. Is it true, or disputed. If it's true then that shows it's a purely racist religion as it favours a particular race and bases everything on this race. The chosen people must have seen the true face of this religion actualise once they converted Arabs to judaism. Of course it's going to be racist when you have it written in plain black and white about them being supposedly chosen by a god who they say is for all people.
Considering Exodus and then its Stations, chronologically, socio-politically and militarily (given the proposed Acoustic/Electromagnetic Powers of Arc of the Covenant) does not sound plausible. Moreover, Canaanites were later identified as Phoenicians then Carthaginians, Khazarians etc. “Bible says Canaanites were wiped out by Israelites but scientists just found their descendants living in Lebanon”, Independent, September 2017.
the Bible says nowhere that the Canaanites were wiped out by Israelites. If you're gonna disprove something, you have to at least read what you're trying to disprove.
@@littleandre4957 - *Yisrael was just a group of Canaanites* _okay, but can you prove it though_ Yes - this is the view of many archaeologists and historians today. K. L. Noll says, in Canaan and Israel in Antiquity: A Textbook on History and Religion and Nebel, Almut; Filon, Dvora; Brinkmann, Bernd; Majumder, Partha P.; Faerman, Marina; Oppenheim, Ariella (2001). "The Y Chromosome Pool of Jews as Part of the Genetic Landscape of the Middle East". The American Journal of Human Genetics. 69 (5): 1095-112. doi:10.1086/324070. PMC 1274378. PMID 11573163.
The Bible clearly says that the Israelites started in Canaan as Abraham had moved there from the area of the Chaldeans (modern Iraq). Abraham's grandson Jacob was born in Canaan and was renamed "Israel" by God; Israel had 12 sons from whom the twelve tribes of Israel were formed. Israel's son Joseph was sold into slavery in Egypt by his brothers. Joseph became 2nd in command of Egypt and saved Egypt from famine. Joseph's eleven brothers later joined him due to famine back in their homeland of Canaan. Over time, the Egyptian Pharaohs forgot Joseph's work in saving the people and they plunged the Israelites into slavery. After generations of slavery, one of the Israelites, Moses, was raised up as a leader of Egypt. When Moses found out his heritage, he led the Israelites out of slavery and away from Egypt, back to Canaan, where they ultimately re-settled in the land and renamed it Israel. Of course, The Bible gives credit for all of this to the Guiding Hand of God.
My point in posting the comment was to answer what the video mentioned about whether the Israelites were themselves Canaanites from the viewpoint of the Bible. Regardless whether there is archaeological evidence of Israelite presence in Egypt, the Exodus, or military conquest of Canaan, the Bible makes the claim that the Israelites got their start in Canaan. As to whether there is evidence of captivity in Egypt or the Exodus, there are credentialed researchers who claim that there is such evidence. Here is one: ruclips.net/p/PLmPlHbCMF9vpLKzMCZOLgy3gj93Nr1uoK
@@ritawing1064 There actually is. A lot. Hyskos were Hebrews also many believe. Not invading forces. Bump the timeline back to around 1,500 bC and it all fits. Also Joseph's seal was found.
@@AlexBigShid Thousands of years of translations? The Jewish scribes took extremely careful care to write down the Scriptures word-for-word since they were literally the words of God, and I don't know of any major translations that would alter the meaning of the text that severely... but at the end of the day if you are trying to figure out if the Bible is entirely historically accurate based on some rocks then the Bible won't do you any good anyway. It's not meant to just be a history book. It's the inspired word of God that directs us and gives us purpose and meaning. In it are the words of life. It's kinda sad that people care more about the Bible's historicity (which we might not ever be able to prove or disprove with archaeology completely) than about its meaning.
@bliots8369 Considering the bible was translated (in order 3,500 years ago) from Biblical Hebrew to Classical Aramaic, to Koine Greek, to Classical Latin, to Old High German, to Old English to Middle English to Early Modern English and Current English, the true meaning has definitely lost its base.
@@AlexBigShid Modern Biblical translators translate directly from the original Hebrew and Greek languages, meaning there has really only been one translation from Hebrew or Greek to English or whatever language it has been translated in to. And with so many historical manuscripts to translate from, there is more reason to be sure of the Bible's reliability than any other piece of ancient literature scholars believe to be true today.
The Bible is metaphorical and allegorical stories to convey higher spiritual knowledge. It is not to be taken literally. The apostle Paul says in 2 CORINTHIANS 3:6 "Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; NOT OF THE LETTER, BUT OF THE SPIRIT: FOR THE LETTER KILLETH, but THE SPIRIT GIVETH LIFE." 👍 Taking it as allegorical stories conveying spiritual truth leads to spiritual growth. 👎Reading it letter by letter, word for word - literally leads to spiritual death.
the letters of paul, were just that....private letters he wrote to various churches,they are not gospels......just letters..........he would be very surprised to come back and see what we have done with some simple letters he wrote to churches...
@@robertguest5215 No offense, but you're not understanding what Paul is saying about the "letter vs the spirit". He also says in Romans the patriarchs of the old testament weren't literal people but archetypes. Moses exists/never existed and the Exodus happens/never happened. Moses exists because every human being IS Moses. The Exodus happens within each person as they (Moses) leave Egypt (lower mind) for the Promise Land (higher mind). Moses as an actual person described in the Bible never existed. The Exodus as described in the Bible never happened. This is evident in the Egyptians very meticulous historical records - nothing at all is mentioned of Moses or a great exodus of millions of Hebrews. Archeologists have found no evidence of any mass exodus taking place or any trace of millions of people having traveled from Egypt to Palestine. If the Bible was read and understood as it should be rather than literally this world would be much better because each person would have the power it gives. Most Christians today realize the power the Bible speaks of isn't found in churches or Christianity as preached and taught today. The Pharisees asked Jesus by what AUTHORITY did he teach his teachings. 🚩There was something different about what he was teaching. He was teaching the masses there was no need for a middle man or physical temple - that religion was a scam, a huge money making business. He said: "The Kingdom of Heaven does not come by observation. For when they say Lo! He is here or there - believe them not for the Kingdom of Heaven is WITHIN YOU." 99.9% of Christians: Looking for and waiting for Jesus to return FROM HEAVEN at "The Rapture". 🙄
As an Atheist & Pagan and objective reader of religion, it is obvious that most of the Bible especially the supernatural stories in it are false. Israelites being Canaanites or at least another northern Semitic group nearly indigenous to the region nearly identical to the Canaanites makes the most sense. Bible does say that they lived in the same region that one of Noah’s sons was Canaan and that there were multiple tribes of Israel. Now Noah’s ark we know was influenced by older pagan flood myths and that flood myths were common in ancient civilizations that were always around water be it seas or rivers. There are two major reasons to why the Israelis replaced the Canaanites without actually doing it through actual warfare and that they lied about that. That like other great empires of the time they fell similar to Ancient Rome & Egypt & that their new monotheistic beliefs did demonize the earlier pagan polytheistic culture by labeling their gods as devils & false gods such as tje Canaanite deities Baal & Ashtoroth. If it was proven that Jews/Israelites were in fact Canaanites which I think is most likely given they were so close any way; it shows two things. That one that the Israelites were not bloodthirsty conquerers stealing land from the people there that they themselves portrayed themselves as but also that they in fact indigenous to the land as Cannanites but they were of the lower class the farmers that were able to survive as they were able to feed themselves and survive after the fall of the Canaanite civilization. Still while most of the Bible is false one thing that is true about it is that it accurately depicts the Israelites/Jews as that followed Judaism as sexist and oppressive & violent monotheists. Its their mentality that is proven truth of the Bible not the stories. It does prove also that they are indigenous to the land of Israel.
Remember the story of Joseph &his coat of many colors? Okay, Joseph & his brothers are the sons of Isaac and they lived in Canaan. Joseph’s brothers sold him to slavers who were on their way to Egypt. Then we have Joseph in Egypt eventually becoming in charge of the grain in storage for the coming famine. Isaac sent his sons to Egypt to buy grain because of famine in Canaan. Joseph & his family had a great reunion. Pharaoh had Joseph’s family move to Egypt where they lived for 100 years (?) before the the reigning pharaoh decided they might turn against Egypt & started treating them cruelly eventually making them slaves. There’s tons more to the story how everything happened but that’s a brief explanation of how the Israelites became slaves.
The Canaanites were giants read the verse in the bible where the spies went into the land and got frightened by its inhabitants because they were giants. So, it wasn't a normal fight because the Israelites had to find ways to outsmart the giants and defeat them with Gods help.
@@shainazion4073 Thats not what the spies that Moses sent to Canaan said in the bible. They clearly said they saw the children of Anak who was a giant in the land. They even said they were like grasshoppers before the inhabitants. Why would they make that huge a difference between themselves and the Canaanites?
@@InvisibleThings-pn5kc I just read the chapter ( Numbers 13) in Hebrew, it says nothing about giants, it talks of men of a tall stature, but not a giant.
There so many verses mentioning giants you must have a crappy bible version to not have read all the wars the Israelites had with giants they even say in a verse that the giants were a pain to their ears because of how loud they were.
@@applesmangos7774 There is no proof Adam, Abraham, Solomon or Solomon's Temple even existed. The 1948 years are important because of the way it is written. I'm not saying there is no Creator. I'm only saying the Bible is metaphorical Truth and higher spiritual knowledge from this Creator using metaphorical, allegorical and symbolic language.
@@TheTexorcist68 So basically you couldn't explain how GOD foreshadowed the year 1948 with Abraham the father of the Hebrew people being born 1,948 years after Adam. His date of birth is 1948 am. GOD Knew we would be using the Gregorian Calendar because HE Is all knowing and outside of space and time which HE created. Nor could you explain the blood moons on Passover in 1948 and 1967 and blood moons are Biblical if you look in Joel.
ETERNAL GLORY TO THE ONLY HEAVENLY FATHER YAHUAH AND HIS SON YAHUSHA! THE RIGHT NAME OF OUR HEAVENLY FATHER IS YAHUAH, AND THE NAME OF HIS SON OF OUR SAVIOR IS YAHUSHA! LORD, GOD ETC ... THESE ARE ONLY PAGAN TITLES REPLACED BY REAL HEBREW NAMES!
@Eddie 1967 lol.... pathetic excuses We know there are multiple versions of the Abraham story and in the oldest isaac is sacrificed. Theres other examples of God favouring child sacrifice. Is your God the bible God? The shady voice that demands Abraham to kill his child for no good reason?
@Eddie 1967 yeah... there's no angel in the original versions to stop Abraham from killing isaac. Saying they are metaphors is a terrible excuse especially when we know yhwh is Baal.... yep.... Hebrews are Canaanite and the Canaanites worshipped Baal aka yhwh
Dangerous ground when your intent is to tell God His word is a lie. I to used to behave as if there is no hell as well. Hope to see you on the other side. Keep studying. Wise men still seek Him.
Nu. Acolo s-a fornat poporul lor, acum acum 12,000 de ani. Biblia descrie, metaforic, cum Dumnezeul Unic a "cucerit" Caananul si l-a dat poporului ales". Si cand citesti Motanul Incaltat crezi ca e pe bune?
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
The whole idea that a god gave anyone a specific piece of ground is ludicrous.
Unless God works on commision.
Wasn't Canaan already under Egypt during Ramesses ? So how could they escape Egypt?
The egyptian or amalekites were defeated by jews under david. So that's how egypt fled from israel.
@@antoniussamuelson3748 David came about 300-500 years after exodus!!! What are you talking?
@@antoniussamuelson3748 The Amalekites where Giants. One Tribe of the 3 dozen Tribes of Giants listed in the Bible. Gen:14:7.
@@MrDarkElement in reality, amalekites never exist. There is no any reference that these people ever exist. Even egyptian and assyrian incripstion never mention about the existence of amalekites. Also, german historian hugo winkler found no evidence that these biblical people ever exist.
Egypt was not ruling over Canaan in the same sense that they were in mainland Egypt. Egypt had a few settlements in Canaan just to collect taxes and see that the pharaoh got support from Canaanite tribes. After Israel fled east across the Red Sea and wandered in the wilderness, Egyptian power started to wane. A group of unspecified warrior tribes called the "Sea Peoples" popped up on the northeastern tip of Egypt and pushed them out of Canaan, even attempting invasion. After Egypt lost power in Canaan, the Israelites moved in to Canaan from the east. The only way Egypt would be able to push Israel out would be to go up along the Mediterranean, through the Sea Peoples north of Israel, and then circle back southward to attack Israel. It makes no sense to assume that Egypt would be strong enough to drive out Israel, yet not strong enough to defend against the "Sea Peoples".
Yes, "critical archeology". The same "critical archeology" that said for decades that the Hittites did not exist. The fact that they find Cannaite/phonecian idols in Jewish areas does not dis prove the Bible, as the Bible tells us that: 1) they lived next to each other and 2) That some Israelites were worshiping these idols and subsequently punished by God. How they don not know this as studied scientists is either they need to study more or they have a bias against the Judaeo Christian belief.
Found the angry coper
@@ManiacMayhem7256 Not angry. Just pointing out historical facts. That is, if you're calling me angry; I don't know what you mean by "coper".
@@Drakemiser
The denial of the Hittites is interesting, but archaeological evidence changed opinion accordingly. Around that same time most historians accepted the Bible as mostly accurate, archaeology changed that. That's the same for here. There is plenty of evidence for a Canaanite origin for the Israelites, barely any for the scale and origin of the Exodus narrative
@@ManiacMayhem7256 There is evidence of the Exodus right down to a mountain topped with black rocks. These rocks are only black on the top, but when turned over, are as grey as the surrounding rocks meaning they wouldn't be volcanic, and even if they were, there is no known volcano any where near it. The mount is called Jabal El Laws or Mountain of Laws to the locals. Near it are 12 wells, still in existence today. Near that is a huge stone with water erosion and a dry, eroded creek bed with obvious erosion. But these places aren't studied except for a few rouge geologist for 1)the Saudis have made them off limits. 2)political upheaval in the area. There were also two pillars found on either side of the Red Sea. One had had it's insertions washed off, but the other showed inscriptions of these cylinders being erected by Solomon in remembrance of the Exodus and crossing of the Red Sea. A lot of this stuff has become uninteresting to scientists because they are secular; you don't study what you don't believe or care about. But they are there. There is evidence of chariots at the bottom of the Red Sea. There are sulfur balls(white sulfur which is rare in nature) around un excavated ziggurats that fit the Sodom narrative. There is an Egyptian stele representing Joseph and possibly Ephraim. There is a lot of evidence; you just have to want to find it. And with the internet, it's not hard.
@@ManiacMayhem7256 Geologists also said Pilot, David, and Isaiah didn't exist. That is until they found the Pilot stele. And just recently a seal of the prophet Isaiah and a metal--copper I believe--stele about The House of David. These are recent--like this year--finds, but you won't hear about them in the news because they don't care and really don't want anything Godly to be true. Isaiah from the 8th century BC!! And writings about David from the 11th century!! Any other find like this would be huge news, but not findings related to the
living God. It's a shame. We're talking about artifacts before or around the time of the founding of Rome.
this is old and outdated there is plenty of evidence that recent archeologists have discovered.
If you go by when the Israelites say they conquered Cannan then it lines up. If you decided they come later then it doesnt line up.
The problem is that the evidence still doesn’t make sense because the walls would have fallen 100 years before it was said to have happened in the Bible
This is old. Much discoveries since then.
Much discovery* or Many discoveries*
Try not to sound like an idiot when trying to sound smart.
@@vladtschill8774 English isn't your first language obviously 🙄
Please yes live with your neighbor
Why would God give them 10 commandments not 11 or 9. If the commandment said, thou shall not kill, why would God tell them to kill everyone in a battle.
"Thou shalt not murder."
Make more sense?
@@Spontaneous0rder so if my imaginary friend who you don't see or believe in tells me to take my family to your house kill you and your family and take your house what is that called???
Nobody tosses a dwarf .
Gimli
Dont tell the elf
I learned a lot
it's demonic bs. atheist.
@@applesmangos7774 No, it's consistent with scholarship done on this topic. Also, demons do not exist.
@@applesmangos7774
Canaanite = hebrew. Yhwh = baal
Jebus didn't exist
@@jesusthelordfraud4993 that's been Debunked so many times. Seek CHRIST. Really. then u'll have Peace.
@@applesmangos7774 LOL... worship a guy getting crucified and a God that demands and favours child sacrifice...
The entire planet has had enough of that crap...
It tells you in the bible that they did not wipe them all and god was mad. When people says gods loves everyone. In the bible he clearly did not. Many time he flat out says when he doesn’t like someone or a group of people. For instance. Jacob I have loved but Esau I have hated. Same with Cain and Able. He excepted all of Able’s offerings but not Cain’s. When he doesn’t hear from able for awhile. He questions his Whereabouts. The Israelites was supposed to be the dominant rulers. I truly believe that God wanted to wipe out curtain nations that would’ve pose a threat to the Israelites later on. However. The Israelites didn’t do all that was commanded of them and spared some Canaanites. Those who were spared eventually some married into the Israelites. The Israelites were never Canaanites. But the Canaanites were absorb into Israelites cultures. It also says that Canaanites would never forget what the Israelites did. There would be a time when the descendants of the surviving Canaanites. Those who did not married into the Israelites would seek revenge.
In the Garden the snake who was Lucifer had sex with Eve giving birth to Cain but even before that took place Lilith Adams first wife who also had sex with Lucifer gave birth to the Asian races that's why Asian people worship the dragon who is Lucifer.
Why else do you think Yahushua called the Pharisees vipers and literal offspring of the devil? He even further said that just like Lucifer was a thieve, murderer and a liar so too would his offspring be just like him
The 11 sons of Jacob married Canaanite women, the 12th married an Egyptian. So they were assimilated inti the Israelites from the beginning.
@@InvisibleThings-pn5kc I think this has very spiritual repercussions for the state of gods children. Will they be Canaanite or an Israelite. They have the choice to make
I wonder if the period when those empires in the Mediterranean region collapsed, coincided with something like a pole shift, a shift in Earth's axis, a change in the core's rotation, etc, etc. How can one explain such a widespread fall of large, developed civilizations, without considering some Earth-altering event?....OR, "Those Earthlings are getting too uppity. Fire up the 'Bull of Heaven!' "
😂 cool thought!
seems kinda silly to dismiss the invasion of Canaan just because the Bible affirms it. Saying there was an earth-altering event with no evidence whatsoever is crazy to me
@@bliots8369 The Bible has nothing to do with it. The alleged date of the Israelite invasion of Canaan is 1406 B.C, the Bronze Age Collapse began about 200 years later. However, there's archaeological evidence that the occupation of Canaan was peaceful. Also, at that time, Palestine was an Egyptian possession. It's doubtful the Israelites wanted to go to war against Egypt.
@@Pootycat8359 I think there’s a lot more evidence of an invasion than there is of a peaceful migration. Israel would not have gone to war with Egypt when taking over Canaan because Egypt was not ruling over Canaan in the same sense that they were in mainland Egypt. Egypt had a few settlements in Canaan just to collect taxes and see that the pharaoh got support from Canaanite tribes. After Israel fled east across the Red Sea and wandered in the wilderness, Egyptian power started to wane. A group of unspecified war tribes called "Sea Peoples" popped up on the northeastern tip of Egypt and pushed them out of Canaan, even attempting invasion. After Egypt lost power in Canaan, the Israelites moved in to Canaan from the east. The only way Egypt would be able to push Israel out would be to go up along the Mediterranean, through the “Sea Peoples” north of Israel, and then circle back southward to attack Israel. It makes no sense to assume that Egypt would be strong enough to drive out Israel, yet not strong enough to defend against the "Sea Peoples".
@@bliots8369You are just oblivious of history. Egypt , the 18th and 19th dynasty had their army garrisoned in Canaan for campaigns against Hittites. Those fleeing Israelites would be walking straight into those army's hands, if you take the biblical time of Moses. They would be annihilated , especially, if their Pharaoh' s first born was killed by these immigrants God. And a pharoah would' nt be daft enough to follow an escaping slaves through a sea bed, when he can encircle them through north, when Suez canal was non existent.
"The Lord commanded them to march " Also, to kill (a close relative) to test your loyalty to the lord. The latter is not referring to an opponent in war, it's during peacetime. Pure barbarism.
Christianity is a horrible and barbaric story as well ending in a bloody mess. Although it never orders murder and usurpation like judaism and islam, it indirectly orders the conquering of lands by telling people to preach the gospel to the world.
Which it did (starting in Europe). As with Islam and judaism it was used as a premise to steal land. Thout shoult not steal, only take in my name
Assyrian Christians had a massive presence in the east spreading the word and without any military force but of course were then largely wiped out by Tamerlane.
@@palsyr4307 I was thinking more about the colonising of the americas and all the rest....They had to convert everyone and justified taking their land as the word of god. Exactly like the Jews and Muslims did (although jews don't care about converting anyone not being a missionary religion) because it's the same malevolent, revengeful, murderous god isn't it?
@@alexxela8956 Perhaps or some vengeful murderous zealots self projecting what they think god is like (whether or not god exists.) The reason why Jews don't go around converting people anymore is because after John Hyrcanus forced converted Arabs and the neighboring Canaanite speaking people in Jordan to fight against the Greeks, the converts ended up behaving zealous as well to prove themselves among the Judeans and this I believe is what ultimately planted the seeds for inter-Abrahamic sectarian divisions that we see today because the Judean Jews and forced converted Arab Jews never really got along well and if you're an Arab but your "holy" book says you are a casted out child of a slave woman, you might get real offended and join a religion more welcoming to an Arab. Or if you're a Hellenistic Jew or Syrian Aramean/Assyrian, maybe Christianity would have appealed to you. If you were an orthodox Jew in Judah, you would have preferred Judaism. If you were a Samaritan rejected by Rabbinic Judaism, you probably would have remained a Samaritan
@@alexxela8956 No...you are referring to yahweh, yahweh is NOT our creator, yahweh is a virgin eating dragon😉
Search it on YT, youll see! Our creator is not mean or vengeful, that is clearly yahweh! If you're interested, look into the GOOD GOD channel, or 9Nania, they both break it down very well! If not, that's your choice, we're all entitled to our own choices(although I don't know for how much longer we will)! Either way, I Hope you have a wonderful, fulfilling day 💗
@@palsyr4307 I never knew all of this. Is it true, or disputed. If it's true then that shows it's a purely racist religion as it favours a particular race and bases everything on this race.
The chosen people must have seen the true face of this religion actualise once they converted Arabs to judaism. Of course it's going to be racist when you have it written in plain black and white about them being supposedly chosen by a god who they say is for all people.
To be a promised land, there seems to be distinct lack of water and fertile lands.
We don't know how everything was back then
It wasn't always arid land. It was a green fertile valley
THIS IS NOT CORRECT .ABRAHAM WAS LONG BEFORE MOSES ON THE MOUNT.
Considering Exodus and then its Stations, chronologically, socio-politically and militarily (given the proposed Acoustic/Electromagnetic Powers of Arc of the Covenant) does not sound plausible.
Moreover, Canaanites were later identified as Phoenicians then Carthaginians, Khazarians etc.
“Bible says Canaanites were wiped out by Israelites but scientists just found their descendants living in Lebanon”, Independent, September 2017.
The Israelites we're Canaanites
The Canaanites were never thought to be Khazarians!!
The Torah says that the Israelites were supposed to destroy the Canaanites, they did not.,they lived among them and the sons of Jacob married them.
the Bible says nowhere that the Canaanites were wiped out by Israelites. If you're gonna disprove something, you have to at least read what you're trying to disprove.
Solomon dynasty next
4:19 lol welp, don't bring it up if you don't wanna talk about it 😅
The Canaanites, were called by the Greeks, Phoenicians and Ethopians
It was an internal revolt that created Israelites.
Has any of these people/archeologists read the whole bible before?.... Yisra'elis at one time went off the path and worshipped the Canaanite "gods".
Probably most of them have.
Yisrael was just a group of Canaanites
@@benjalucian1515 I wonder...
@@teamcarib2707 okay, but can you prove it though?
@@littleandre4957 - *Yisrael was just a group of Canaanites* _okay, but can you prove it though_ Yes - this is the view of many archaeologists and historians today. K. L. Noll says, in Canaan and Israel in Antiquity: A Textbook on History and Religion and Nebel, Almut; Filon, Dvora; Brinkmann, Bernd; Majumder, Partha P.; Faerman, Marina; Oppenheim, Ariella (2001). "The Y Chromosome Pool of Jews as Part of the Genetic Landscape of the Middle East". The American Journal of Human Genetics. 69 (5): 1095-112. doi:10.1086/324070. PMC 1274378. PMID 11573163.
what's the guys name I love his voice
John Rhys-Davis!
@@SecondTake123 gimli?
@@mikethomas4423 Yes
@Matt React Lord of the Rings.
@@PracticalBibleStudies Also Sallah in the "Indiana Jones" movies; it was his connection to Indie that landed him the "Archaeology" gig.
Jealousy of what the giants have built and wanted it all for themselves without doing all the hard work.
based
The Bible clearly says that the Israelites started in Canaan as Abraham had moved there from the area of the Chaldeans (modern Iraq).
Abraham's grandson Jacob was born in Canaan and was renamed "Israel" by God; Israel had 12 sons from whom the twelve tribes of Israel were formed. Israel's son Joseph was sold into slavery in Egypt by his brothers. Joseph became 2nd in command of Egypt and saved Egypt from famine. Joseph's eleven brothers later joined him due to famine back in their homeland of Canaan. Over time, the Egyptian Pharaohs forgot Joseph's work in saving the people and they plunged the Israelites into slavery. After generations of slavery, one of the Israelites, Moses, was raised up as a leader of Egypt. When Moses found out his heritage, he led the Israelites out of slavery and away from Egypt, back to Canaan, where they ultimately re-settled in the land and renamed it Israel. Of course, The Bible gives credit for all of this to the Guiding Hand of God.
oh I get it an atheist with no proof lol. Stupid theory.
Unfortunately there is no evidence of the stay in Egypt or an exodus.
My point in posting the comment was to answer what the video mentioned about whether the Israelites were themselves Canaanites from the viewpoint of the Bible. Regardless whether there is archaeological evidence of Israelite presence in Egypt, the Exodus, or military conquest of Canaan, the Bible makes the claim that the Israelites got their start in Canaan.
As to whether there is evidence of captivity in Egypt or the Exodus, there are credentialed researchers who claim that there is such evidence.
Here is one:
ruclips.net/p/PLmPlHbCMF9vpLKzMCZOLgy3gj93Nr1uoK
@@ritawing1064 There actually is. A lot. Hyskos were Hebrews also many believe. Not invading forces. Bump the timeline back to around 1,500 bC and it all fits. Also Joseph's seal was found.
But chaldean city was founded in 10BC while Abraham lived 21BC
Great documentary
Very educational. Seems like a lot of the history in the Old Testament is made up.
Considering that much of it was first written down centuries after it was alleged to have happened it would have to be mostly "made up."
@@HaroldCrews That and literally thousands of years of translations, the true meaning of it seems to have been lost long ago.
@@AlexBigShid Thousands of years of translations? The Jewish scribes took extremely careful care to write down the Scriptures word-for-word since they were literally the words of God, and I don't know of any major translations that would alter the meaning of the text that severely... but at the end of the day if you are trying to figure out if the Bible is entirely historically accurate based on some rocks then the Bible won't do you any good anyway. It's not meant to just be a history book. It's the inspired word of God that directs us and gives us purpose and meaning. In it are the words of life. It's kinda sad that people care more about the Bible's historicity (which we might not ever be able to prove or disprove with archaeology completely) than about its meaning.
@bliots8369 Considering the bible was translated (in order 3,500 years ago) from Biblical Hebrew to Classical Aramaic, to Koine Greek, to Classical Latin, to Old High German, to Old English to Middle English to Early Modern English and Current English, the true meaning has definitely lost its base.
@@AlexBigShid Modern Biblical translators translate directly from the original Hebrew and Greek languages, meaning there has really only been one translation from Hebrew or Greek to English or whatever language it has been translated in to. And with so many historical manuscripts to translate from, there is more reason to be sure of the Bible's reliability than any other piece of ancient literature scholars believe to be true today.
What? The land is called CANAAN, not PALESTINE? (Asking in jest)
Well for sure it's not Israel. 😉😉👍
@@shamhisham3702 Israel was a group of people, not a country 🙄
@@ChiGirl43 Israel was a kingdom
They didn't have to conquer it they were Canaanites
This info is outdated. Check the latest archeology & research.
I think John Rhys Davies is dead.
Care to elaborate? Kind of dumb to say something is wrong without saying exactly why or where it's wrong.
Eddie 1967 Easy way to control history is to be the ones writing it.
The television series "Archaeology" was produced in the early 1990's. This episode is almost thirty years old.
No.
Yes Joshua conquered Canaan, with G-D's blessing, no it wasn't under the Egyptians, Jericho,
The Bible is metaphorical and allegorical stories to convey higher spiritual knowledge. It is not to be taken literally.
The apostle Paul says in 2 CORINTHIANS 3:6
"Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; NOT OF THE LETTER, BUT OF THE SPIRIT: FOR THE LETTER KILLETH,
but THE SPIRIT GIVETH LIFE."
👍 Taking it as allegorical stories conveying spiritual truth leads to spiritual growth.
👎Reading it letter by letter, word for word - literally leads to spiritual death.
the letters of paul, were just that....private letters he wrote to various churches,they are not gospels......just letters..........he would be very surprised to come back and see what we have done with some simple letters he wrote to churches...
@@robertguest5215 No offense, but you're not understanding what Paul is saying about the "letter vs the spirit". He also says in Romans the patriarchs of the old testament weren't literal people but archetypes. Moses exists/never existed and the Exodus happens/never happened.
Moses exists because every human being IS Moses. The Exodus happens within each person as they (Moses) leave Egypt (lower mind) for the Promise Land (higher mind). Moses as an actual person described in the Bible never existed. The Exodus as described in the Bible never happened. This is evident in the Egyptians very meticulous historical records - nothing at all is mentioned of Moses or a great exodus of millions of Hebrews. Archeologists have found no evidence of any mass exodus taking place or any trace of millions of people having traveled from Egypt to Palestine. If the Bible was read and understood as it should be rather than literally this world would be much better because each person would have the power it gives. Most Christians today realize the power the Bible speaks of isn't found in churches or Christianity as preached and taught today. The Pharisees asked Jesus by what AUTHORITY did he teach his teachings. 🚩There was something different about what he was teaching.
He was teaching the masses there was no need for a middle man or physical temple - that religion was a scam, a huge money making business. He said: "The Kingdom of Heaven does not come by observation. For when they say Lo! He is here or there - believe them not for the Kingdom of Heaven is WITHIN YOU."
99.9% of Christians: Looking for and waiting for Jesus to return FROM HEAVEN at "The Rapture". 🙄
Evolution is not earth shaking is just an unsupported theory😅
Has Israel built any hotels at Lifta? Just asking…..
As an Atheist & Pagan and objective reader of religion, it is obvious that most of the Bible especially the supernatural stories in it are false. Israelites being Canaanites or at least another northern Semitic group nearly indigenous to the region nearly identical to the Canaanites makes the most sense. Bible does say that they lived in the same region that one of Noah’s sons was Canaan and that there were multiple tribes of Israel. Now Noah’s ark we know was influenced by older pagan flood myths and that flood myths were common in ancient civilizations that were always around water be it seas or rivers. There are two major reasons to why the Israelis replaced the Canaanites without actually doing it through actual warfare and that they lied about that. That like other great empires of the time they fell similar to Ancient Rome & Egypt & that their new monotheistic beliefs did demonize the earlier pagan polytheistic culture by labeling their gods as devils & false gods such as tje Canaanite deities Baal & Ashtoroth. If it was proven that Jews/Israelites were in fact Canaanites which I think is most likely given they were so close any way; it shows two things. That one that the Israelites were not bloodthirsty conquerers stealing land from the people there that they themselves portrayed themselves as but also that they in fact indigenous to the land as Cannanites but they were of the lower class the farmers that were able to survive as they were able to feed themselves and survive after the fall of the Canaanite civilization. Still while most of the Bible is false one thing that is true about it is that it accurately depicts the Israelites/Jews as that followed Judaism as sexist and oppressive & violent monotheists. Its their mentality that is proven truth of the Bible not the stories. It does prove also that they are indigenous to the land of Israel.
let God be true, and every man a liar
I love fiction stories of the Bible
Ooohhh. Got em
Got us there bud. This really is gonna sway a load of Christians
cheap shot
Before the israelites became slaves of egypt, what were they? Where did they live? How did they became slaves?
Remember the story of Joseph &his coat of many colors? Okay, Joseph & his brothers are the sons of Isaac and they lived in Canaan. Joseph’s brothers sold him to slavers who were on their way to Egypt. Then we have Joseph in Egypt eventually becoming in charge of the grain in storage for the coming famine. Isaac sent his sons to Egypt to buy grain because of famine in Canaan. Joseph & his family had a great reunion. Pharaoh had Joseph’s family move to Egypt where they lived for 100 years (?) before the the reigning pharaoh decided they might turn against Egypt & started treating them cruelly eventually making them slaves. There’s tons more to the story how everything happened but that’s a brief explanation of how the Israelites became slaves.
@@thecrew1871 from that time up until moses should be 100yrs? Or more?
Exactly. They came from Canaan. Are people willfully ignoring that part?
God i so dislike this pattern of presentation so BS drama and trivial statements
The Canaanites were giants read the verse in the bible where the spies went into the land and got frightened by its inhabitants because they were giants. So, it wasn't a normal fight because the Israelites had to find ways to outsmart the giants and defeat them with Gods help.
No, the Canaanites were not giants, the Philistines had some giants.
@@shainazion4073 Thats not what the spies that Moses sent to Canaan said in the bible. They clearly said they saw the children of Anak who was a giant in the land. They even said they were like grasshoppers before the inhabitants. Why would they make that huge a difference between themselves and the Canaanites?
@@InvisibleThings-pn5kc I just read the chapter ( Numbers 13) in Hebrew, it says nothing about giants, it talks of men of a tall stature, but not a giant.
There so many verses mentioning giants you must have a crappy bible version to not have read all the wars the Israelites had with giants they even say in a verse that the giants were a pain to their ears because of how loud they were.
@@InvisibleThings-pn5kc Yeah, the original, before they sensationalized it, learn Hebrew!
Alledge??? It's a fact because it is written in the bible.
Yeah it's call America
The real HOLOCAUST.
No they didn’t they came mostly from local Canaanite stock.
It's not a parable its fact aparable is a fairy tale with a message God gave this land to israel
Prove it without using the Bible.
@@applesmangos7774 There is no proof Adam, Abraham, Solomon or Solomon's Temple even existed. The 1948 years are important because of the way it is written. I'm not saying there is no Creator. I'm only saying the Bible is metaphorical Truth and higher spiritual knowledge from this Creator using metaphorical, allegorical and symbolic language.
@@TheTexorcist68 So basically you couldn't explain how GOD foreshadowed the year 1948 with Abraham the father of the Hebrew people being born 1,948 years after Adam. His date of birth is 1948 am. GOD Knew we would be using the Gregorian Calendar because HE Is all knowing and outside of space and time which HE created.
Nor could you explain the blood moons on Passover in 1948 and 1967 and blood moons are Biblical if you look in Joel.
@@TheTexorcist68 Soon the antichrist will rise, and CHRIST Returns. Persia will attack Israel and CHRIST will save and protect Israel.
@@applesmangos7774 Thank you for sharing your beliefs with me. I appreciate it.
ETERNAL GLORY TO THE ONLY HEAVENLY FATHER YAHUAH AND HIS SON YAHUSHA! THE RIGHT NAME OF OUR HEAVENLY FATHER IS YAHUAH, AND THE NAME OF HIS SON OF OUR SAVIOR IS YAHUSHA! LORD, GOD ETC ... THESE ARE ONLY PAGAN TITLES REPLACED BY REAL HEBREW NAMES!
LOL Jesus didn't exist
@Eddie 1967 your God demands and favours child sacrifice
@Eddie 1967 no... not metaphors
The biblical God does indeed demand and favour child sacrifice
@Eddie 1967 lol.... pathetic excuses
We know there are multiple versions of the Abraham story and in the oldest isaac is sacrificed. Theres other examples of God favouring child sacrifice.
Is your God the bible God? The shady voice that demands Abraham to kill his child for no good reason?
@Eddie 1967 yeah... there's no angel in the original versions to stop Abraham from killing isaac.
Saying they are metaphors is a terrible excuse especially when we know yhwh is Baal.... yep.... Hebrews are Canaanite and the Canaanites worshipped Baal aka yhwh
Perhaps they made up a story about pre owning the land
Free Palestine
Palestine didn't exist then
Dangerous ground when your intent is to tell God His word is a lie. I to used to behave as if there is no hell as well. Hope to see you on the other side. Keep studying. Wise men still seek Him.
Nu. Acolo s-a fornat poporul lor, acum acum 12,000 de ani. Biblia descrie, metaforic, cum Dumnezeul Unic a "cucerit" Caananul si l-a dat poporului ales". Si cand citesti Motanul Incaltat crezi ca e pe bune?