This is very clear as far as it goes, but it leaves several questions. 1) can a national minimum wage applied to all regions, all industries, get just the right increase that will not increase unemployment overall? 2) When a firm is monopsonistic in the labor market, but competitive in its product markets, does it raise prices to recover the lost profits due to minimum wage increases?
That's completely different. an oligopolistic market has to do with the control firms have over the CONSUMER goods. A monopsony has to do with the firm's control over the LABOUR. One has to do with the output (consumer goods) and the other is a factor of production (labour)
Doesn’t The MRC slope>the SL slope imply that wages are negotiated on a collective basis. Doesn’t the heterogenous nature of labor as a commodity entail that wages are negotiated on an individual basis, and therefore the increase in wages required to attract workers who are less willingness to sell independent of the wages for workers who are more willing to sell? Labor markets aren’t like say gas, where price is based on the collective willingness to buy of all buyers. Each persons labor is distinct, and so the price of each persons labor is distinct. Practically speaking why would a potential seller be influenced by the wages of other sellers, so long as their own wage is independent. The employer then has no incentive to raise wages for anyone who has already accepted a given wage? If this is in fact the case then why is the MRC slope>the SL slope?
Thank you! Labor econ course kicking my butt and this is a great help!
Thanks from Afghanistan for such interesting explanation
This is very clear as far as it goes, but it leaves several questions. 1) can a national minimum wage applied to all regions, all industries, get just the right increase that will not increase unemployment overall? 2) When a firm is monopsonistic in the labor market, but competitive in its product markets, does it raise prices to recover the lost profits due to minimum wage increases?
So goood, thank you!!
Soooo clear, thank you sir
wow this is really well explained. thanks for the help :)
Sir how can i be thank full to you . Plz Comment. Your explanation i just would like to mention just wow!
Really interesting stuff
very good video
Great as always.
+jason Welker What about in oligopsonistic labor market would the same effect be seen
That's completely different. an oligopolistic market has to do with the control firms have over the CONSUMER goods. A monopsony has to do with the firm's control over the LABOUR. One has to do with the output (consumer goods) and the other is a factor of production (labour)
MonkeyMaster 64 oligopsony not oligopoly
Doesn’t The MRC slope>the SL slope imply that wages are negotiated on a collective basis. Doesn’t the heterogenous nature of labor as a commodity entail that wages are negotiated on an individual basis, and therefore the increase in wages required to attract workers who are less willingness to sell independent of the wages for workers who are more willing to sell?
Labor markets aren’t like say gas, where price is based on the collective willingness to buy of all buyers. Each persons labor is distinct, and so the price of each persons labor is distinct.
Practically speaking why would a potential seller be influenced by the wages of other sellers, so long as their own wage is independent. The employer then has no incentive to raise wages for anyone who has already accepted a given wage? If this is in fact the case then why is the MRC slope>the SL slope?
What song is used in the intro?
Making Me Nervous (Brad Sucks)
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏