WARNING... Photo Editing is Dead!

[@psdesireYT]

The era of traditional photo editing is coming to an end, and I have mixed feelings of fear and excitement about the advancements in AI technology. There's news from Adobe that in the near future, they will release an update enabling realistic composites with shadows and lighting by simply copying and pasting. This means anyone can create high-quality complex composites with just one click, without needing any editing skills.

[@VerticDesigns]

I know exactly how you feel, it's definitely a roller-coaster of mixed emotions because in many ways it's bringing so many amazing opportunities but at the same time it's also nuking a lot of careers and peoples livelihoods who have gained knowledge and experience over the many years. It's just crazy how quick everything is advancing and changing but just like everything else in life the end of something is also a start for new opportunities and jobs like Ai Mangers, Ai Prompt Experts and Ai Programmers. Only thing that terrifies me is if Ai eventually advances it's self-consciousness and awareness to the point where it's had enough of doing other peoples work and start some sort of a revolution haha because at that point we'll all just be in their way

[@TerzicGamingRoom]

But you'll always have to pay a subscription to the service, right? Now at least when they say, it's one click for you, or five minutes, I don't care anymore. It's expensive for them to pay adobe monthly anyway, so it's easier when they need to call once a year, and the speed of my response is exactly that one click lol. Now the client base can be much larger.

[@gulljver6]

no excitement, it just sucks. creativity is dead

[@Yosser70]

⁠@@haribehappy3487 It’s never been used to capture reality, more used to capture the photographers reality, which is a very different thing. Photos have also always been edited, all of Ansel Adams’s landscapes were heavily edited for instance. This romantic view of photography is just a fantasy that people like to use to make out it’s more than it is.

[@cameraman655]

The art of photography as a source of income is officially on life support.

[@codeXenigma]

Its still better if you have good quality base images.

[@davidlovephotog2]

That makes no sense. You have to have an image to even work with in the first place and this new photoshop bad AI crap uses photography (stock pics) to alter images (badly). So someone still has to provide those images. The only difference is their stock library can't compete with midjourney stealing from the entire internet.

[@damien7964]

I would not say that because somebody needs to take a decent base photo for it to be professional looking

[@butchgo6130]

Photo editing is Dead when you're doing photo editing and not using any tool or app. AI can't kill photo editing. It only raises photo editing to a higher level.

[@anianait]

transformed, but not dead

[@pixelkat1819]

whistling by the graveyard.
if by ‘transform’ you mean most will need to learn to make selections and learn to type prompts instead of learning advanced photoshopping….
This is barely a transform, its almost an annihilation.

[@anianait]

@@pixelkat1819 if it is dead, then don't just use photoshop anymore, for anything

[@pixelkat1819]

@@anianait nowhere did I say photoshop is dead.

[@anianait]

@@pixelkat1819 it's the title of the video, to which I first responded. If photo editing is dead, then folks should rather switch to fireflies and not use photoshop
(Not really responding to you but just more explanation on what I meant)

[@DeepakJAT0007]

​@@anianaitwhen there's a machine to do the work of 100 labours, their skill is DEAD as it's of no use.

[@btnbao2ki845]

Your guide is great, wish you and your family good health

[@millenial_in_the_middle]

You should see it as a tool. Photo editing is far away from being dead. Especially with restrictions set up by Adobe that might violate community and usage guidlines.

[@definitelynotamurderer602]

Thanks a lot my bro😍❤️Need old school photo manipulation tutorial please sir🙏❤️

[@alanm.6096]

We are working towards a time where the primary control will be your computer’s microphone…when you process an image with a series of verbal commands. And the only primary control will be the amount slider.
Next step? Cameras that compose images for you.
If cameras, as we know them, continue to exist.

[@lisazijlstra15]

The Bible actually talks about this as being a part of the end times. Technology is changing at a super high rate. The world is being prepared for the Anti Christ. The only way to escape is by accepting Jesus as your Lord and Saviour. 🙏

I only think photography will be really dead when all the people have some kinda Google Glass with a good camera capturing the all day long and using AÍ to compose and edit and delivery to you your Photo album of the day, in a level that even a good photographer will have difficulties to maintain the same level, I’m a professional photographer and I’m a bit scared but it’s not that far

[@helloianzakharov]

First of all you get low resolution. The second thing if you have to work with several pictures in a row, you can’t reproduce the same background. It’s a helper tool but it doesn’t replace photography editing in any way

[@nash100ful]

I said the same its good for making a pic bigger and removing stuff

[@Unknown-bj7bz]

It's still in beta my guy! 😭

[@user-pq1tx1um4m]

the quality is terrible. the author uses a small image (only 71% with a small screen resolution). I have tried this tool. it adds terrible edges around the object. for some reason, he draws fingers and unnecessary objects. even in this video, a small picture shows how the child's extra cheek appears in the third picture.

[@musicdownmemorylane7676]

it's not the end for me...Its just the beginning of something magical, wonderful creative approach to AI technology.

[@TheGamingChad.]

yeah, 90% of Fiverr editors who used to be lined up to remove objects is a thing of the past since Ai does it better, faster, for free

[@williamkuroki7683]

Oh man.. did you really accept the marketing pitch of the AI ​​development industries :(

[@crazymisada]

It is disheartening for talented photographers to see inexperienced photographers creating stunning photos effortlessly. Adobe seems to be catering to this by adding easy-to-use features in their products, attracting more buyers. However, it may seem like they don’t prioritize genuine art and photography.

[@McCluski]

just can't believe how great Hasbullah photos will be going forward!

[@jbello9398]

No more Kate backdrops, this looks amazing

[@BobEstremera]

As long as people accept a lowered bar of quality, this will be an amazing tool. The image quality of the boy and that of the background is completely different. The photo is crisp and the background is obviously a contrived, soft 'painterly' image. But, for the masses, these distinctions are probably not noticeable or will quickly be accepted as the 'new norm' in imagery.

[@kjnh12]

Yes. But it's still the beta....

[@MsNellyuan]

If you are doing very large prints , people would have notice all the difference because the picture may have been streched several hundred times . I know my client would not take any imperfection when it comes to large posters , generative fills will help but it is not the miracle all these influencers who are trying to get views say is .

[@MsNellyuan]

@@kjnh12 beta or not , it is still constrained by bandwidth itself . There is not a place in this world where you can have infinite internet speed . 8k , 16k images are going to take an insane amount of times to transfer over the cloud , it is just not a very feasible solution for professional . For amateurs who just want to fix their photo to put in a small frame , sure .

[@MsNellyuan]

@@glareO8O you try what ? I am using it right now , it doesn't scale to higher resolution than 1080p , I seriously don't understand , are there seriously no Photoshop professional here ? So many trolls

[@TheGamingChad.]

lets not forget this is only 2 year technology and the advances they are made are huge, give it 2-3 more years and it will be perfect

[@am6610]

I'm really disappointed and sad at the same time, I spent my whole life learning graphic design and photo editing, This new AI is no help for designers, Its actually a nightmare because as we know some people will lose their jobs, Some others will feel the waste of all that years they spent building their career, It's really sad that a 5 year old child can create a masterpiece in a flash of light...I'm not impressed how machines can create these numbers accurate based images, It is scary if we think about it in the future how It's going to be, Humans actually should fear for themselves because this power is no joke, It could be used for good it could be used for bad.

[@Szabby999]

I have spent 8 years to learn how to perfectly photograph nature images and how to properly use PS to edit and finalize them. I was planning to build a business around my materials and knowledge I gained with really hard work. Now as this AI feature came out my dreams and plans vanished away in a second...

[@liliacreativity1751]

No. Its not legal to use for photographers to use for commercial use. So don't worry

[@Szabby999]

@@liliacreativity1751 It's not what he was talking about.

[@Itdoesntmakesense2me]

😂😂😂😂.... Be happy guys

[@Itdoesntmakesense2me]

😂😂😂Don't be sad. Just change your profession.

[@cleretfernandes5972]

Basic understanding i get as you say one must know English knowledge.
Editing is not dead .. education is dead ..more of the students will loose their career in life and only focus on photography where money is attraction . Ai is the. Demon of destruction in this trade .

[@ReluctantStallion]

Exciting time ahead, thank you for demonstrating the new features.

[@RG..n]

unfortunately i dont see that ''Generative fill"" option

[@priyankaagrawal493]

No matter how advanced Ai has become, it still needs someone who knows Photoshop to use though it seems easy, it still needs a user.
Remember Ai won't end but someone who can use Ai properly can, it just we need to keep adapting instead of getting scared.

[@jimathanasopoulos2234]

100%. The sensationalism and alarmist titles on youtube don't help. People who are unable/unwilling to evolve their stack of skills will become redundant; history shows that this isn't new.

[@am6610]

It only requires a basic knowledge, to create an outstanding images within seconds...That's what makes it scary, I know we should adapt to using AI as a tool but in near future AI will no longer need a human to command it or run it, It will do it by itself by learning from humans and the surrounding environment, So that basically means human workers will be useless to companies and also robots don't get paid so its a bonus for them.

[@TheGamingChad.]

are you serious? 90% of Fiverr editors who used to be lined up to remove objects is a thing of the past since Ai does it better, faster, for free. Why would i pay someone to remove something from a photo when Ai does it for me?

[@raindog6852]

@@TheGamingChad. You won't buy a Photoshop to 'remove something from a photo'. You will pay somebody who can do it for you. BUT you will pay less than today.

[@TheGamingChad.]

@@raindog6852 what i'm saying is, there is plenty of Ai generators such as dalle that can do stuff, its getting more automatized and accessible than ever before

[@photodom2000]

Sorry, this is not photography. The only way I would feel comfortable using this for competitions and camera club entries is if it used one of my own backgrounds to place the subject into. There are going to be lots of restrictions built into competition rules to ensure that it is the photographer and not Photoshop that is the creator of the image. I have nothing against replacing backgrounds or skies as this was possible even in darkroom days, but this takes it to another level.

[@PenFriends]

Not entirely sure how they could prove otherwise

[@photodom2000]

​@@PenFriends The only way for competitions would be to submit the original files with all intact Exif to prove the files have at least been taken with a camera, are yours and have not been created by AI. No issue with using this for editorial or advertising, but not photo competitions.

[@ZeroCool22]

@@photodom2000 I will create Python program with AI to inject the Exif info so you wouldn't know it was AI manipulated.😎

[@tilerman]

@@ZeroCool22And in doing so you'd only be lying to yourself.

[@margaretchurchill5775]

I completely agree with you, I like the art side of photography, and work on layers with my own photos. We are going to discuss this new level in our club. It makes you wonder where all this A I is going , and how far.

[@marcelwijnen9037]

I'm afraid it will not stop here. This control over the graphic surface of life is just the beginning, of even the final step. Running blindly in the direction that technology dictates, without the wisdom how and when to control it is a deadly pitfall. Many lack the ability to think more than one step ahead, that's why they are so easy to control. And AI will control them for sure.

[@carl_anderson9315]

I don't believe that we're gonna lose our jobs, like some people fear. We don't need to worry so much. The repertory and our menu of options are gonna widen but there's plenty of room for talent. What will happen is that the contrast between talent and non-talent will increase. Let me take a huge risk on a sensitive topic: music. Pro Tools, Logic Pro, Cubase, FL Studio, Sound Forge, etc. Lots and lots of amazing studio editors at the tip of our hands, and yet, groups like Queen, The Beatles, and most 70s, and 80s music hasn't been replaced. Sorry to hurt feeling but see how much horrible music is released nowadays, with some exceptions of course. AI is not gonna make a huge difference. A person with no skill, visual logic, understanding of elements like composition, lighting, color, artistic vision, etc, will not be able to go too far. Effort will be needed, practice will be needed, talent will be needed. If someone's artistic taste s*cks, AI will only make it more evident. I'm an architect. Ask me how many horrendous designs I see every day on Instagram by people who have no idea of what they're doing (as well as very nice works too, of course). We're still here, we're important. Don't get discouraged by AI. AI is going to potentiate designers skills. We will be able to work better, faster and more efficiently.

[@militarymatterss]

Yes ai will make life better and easier to do our work,

[@torkuhaemmanuel1593]

Facts, best comment of the slide

[@TheGamingChad.]

@@militarymatterss why would someone pay you when that person can use the same ai that you use to achieve the same results for free? i don't get it, people are not stupid, 90% of Fiverr editors who used to be lined up to remove objects is a thing of the past since Ai does it better, faster, for free. lets be realistic and keep the feelings out of this for a second

[@militarymatterss]

@@TheGamingChad. I don't know you're thinking but I was talking about that ai will increase our creativity not for only designers , and yeah graphic designing is not dead yet just removing objects and making images with generative ai doesn't work everywhere even now some people pay to generate images to others coz they don't know how to create a perfect image🤣

[@TheGamingChad.]

@@militarymatterss give it 2-3 years. It already wiped out all fiverr editors who used to he lined up removing things from photos

[@JEDINITE30]

I've seen a lot of photographers exploit this type of technology. They charge high prices and fool the public. The technology is cool, but it is not photography. If a photographer takes a photograph and that photograph can't stand on it's own two feet without editing, then that person is not a photographer. There, I said it. Eventually, all creative fields will disappear.

[@cleretfernandes5972]

Well said...the traditional original thing will reduce and there won't be creative photography anymore., Sadly yes. ..these young new kids have no professionalism anymore

[@fotomoises6501]

Caro amigo, sou fotografo a 42 anos, trabalho com o photoshop desde quando começou, concordo com você, foi uma das melhores atualizações, seu tutorial é ótimo. Eu estou com um problema, não sei se é a versão que temos no Brasil ou algo do gênero, os prompts, mesmo copiados com total exatidão, a imagem do modelo quase idêntica a do tutorial, ao colocar o prompt, gera uma imagem diferente, você tem alguma ideia de qual seja o motivo? Um grande abraço, sucesso para você!

[@akkarparkiamopas3401]

There s still the downside of the generated images’ resolution which seems too low and does not quite match with the high res original image. This would not work if we want to print large. Posting images in low res social media platform should be fine though ...

[@Szabby999]

There are tutorials on how to generate the same resolution fill as your original image was, so this is not a real issue.

[@akkarparkiamopas3401]

@@Szabby999 Could you give me the link of that tutorial please

[@Szabby999]

@@akkarparkiamopas3401 Here is one bro: /watch?v=pGJ0KjT4Xds

[@TheGamingChad.]

i like how you kept it real, look at 90% of Fiverr editors who used to be lined up to remove objects from photos, now Ai does it better, faster, unlimited variations, for free! let's take our feelings aside, and be realistic about the impact this is gonna have, 2-3 years this will be PERFECT

[@ruivam]

That's right. Now you don't have to pay less than 5 dollars (sometimes less than a dollar) per picture to get a work from someone who gave their sweat to work for you. Now you can spare your 1-5 dollars and get it FOR FREE. Great achievement.

[@TheGamingChad.]

@@ruivam i predict even compositing will be completely automated soon, Ps will become so automated and use friendly to the paint all you do is click a few buttons and you're done within seconds. And for even more accuracy, they might have 3D models stored for ultra realism, coz Ai is currently struggling with symmetrical objects, such as cars, one wheel is bigger than the other, or hands end up having 14 fingers xD

[@ruivam]

@@TheGamingChad. that ain't art. That's automatic imagery that can be generated by any 10 year-old douchebag. Good luck with that and your spare 5 dollars.

[@foreverdrift]

Awesome stuff! Thanks for the tutorial :D

[@Bonjovicrzy]

this will very helpful for removing items in a photo and remove basic background but you will breed to adjust the color and lighting ,,, still need to editing

[@NamedKhubayb]

How can I download the latest Photoshop software I mean the updated software you used

[@jimforbes9119]

A studio background is no longer needed. Will save a LOT of $$$ for portrait studios❗

[@CMDRRustyDog]

Photo Editing as a thing isn't ending though. Generative AI is a tool and the decisions on what to do with that tool are still in the hands and minds of the creators.

[@TheGamingChad.]

my friend, that's your blue pilled lens of looking at it, the more automated something becomes, the more accessible it is for anyone to achieve the same results, this is like aimbot for photoshop, everybody will be equally skilled, pros and noobs

[@CMDRRustyDog]

@@TheGamingChad. Everyone can click a DSLR camera but there is a distinct different with a noob photo and a pro.
And don't tell me I'm looking through a blue pilled lens and at the same time refer to me as 'my friend'.
Whichever way you slice it, editing isn't dead at all. There are many things you can do that AI cannot.

[@TheGamingChad.]

​@@CMDRRustyDog everyone can use the laso tool and type a prompt right off the bat, 90% of Fiverr editors who used to be lined up specifically doing removal tasks is a thing of the past. Human pro editors will always be needed for super specific tasks,i agree, but MOST tasks Ai does it better, faster for free. There is less demand for editors. The easier these "tools" make the job for editors, the more accessible it is for everyone to use. We can't have it both ways.

[@stalk05]

@@TheGamingChad. The problem with Ai though, when the client wants parts changed. Those with no clue how to use the other tools, won't be able to fix those issues. I remember when you could never unblur images and we told everyone it was impossible.......boom here came Remini and other enhancement Ai's. Use the tools available and anyone who knows or is skilled in PS would not worry about those people who can click one button. Photoshop is much more than Generative Ai tool

[@BrianHallmond]

I wish there was a way to extend existing things. I have a big matt in a lot of my photos and I just want that to extending to the bottom of the image when I expand the border, but it usually puts a different kind of floor there and takes a while.

[@grey_beard]

This has a lot of uses and will be very handy.. but definitely not the kind that will be admitted to exhibits and art galleries.

[@rianibanezer3742]

What Tree? position/view?
AI cant do complex what i want.
Editor still Needed.

[@dominickyere4105]

which photoshop version can i get that

[@robertprescott9577]

Wow this is great. thanks for this!!

[@user-zk4cq6ck2h]

No option generate fill

[@s1n112]

So me, as a wedding photographer, i will put my couples in surreal location, will they accept it? It will look very fake i guess, beside the fact that you have to generate the image always till you get the same background.

[@inkfly]

Unleash your creativity? There is no creativity involved.

[@elvintineo6197]

You still need creativity to know what you want on the photo, guaranteed that a creative person will accomplish a lot more than a non creative with this tool. What you really mean , is there’s no PS skills. Embrace this new AI revolution and use it as a tool to save time. But if you want to do things the old way and spend hours doing something that AI can do in seconds, you are free to do so.

[@youlifox]

Author absolutely wrong. Awesome photo it's not "default" wallpaper from background (really, it can make and 15 years ago). Yes, work a little bit will be optimized, but anyway good result = work with details

[@anitakerry3032]

Not a beta fan plus your computer might not be able to perform a lot of beta application . It all depends if you have a fairly new or newish graphic card ect otherwise it will crash, freeze basically stop working.

[@adiewhereat1968]

Not true, I’m working on a 9 year old MacBook and it works flawlessly.

[@KueVue]

AI may be fun and quick for some "photographers" but it won't give you what you want. You'd still need to edit it manually and with your personal touch. I don't think it's dead for retouchers. Retouchers are still much needed because not everyone has the skills/knowledge for these type of creativity.

[@SpidyPlays7]

Whats the point of being a profes photographer if you have to depend on software every time

[@tonyio954]

The issue I have is that this only works with one picture. For example if I want to edit multiple pictures to look the same. AI will take the same words and create a new idea. Or if you want to change an outfit to match the previous AI option to the next picture Ai chose something different

[@SURESHKUMAR-pc2ip]

I'm using a cracked version can I get this feature?

[@tonyleonard1471]

Hell no. Not a chance

[@billburns6545]

Not 100% Yet. However it won’t be long

[@michaelboese239]

Adobe says the AI creations are not for commercial use and for private use only. So I guess photo editing skills are still necessary if you want to create your own work also for commercial use.

[@Unknown-bj7bz]

It will be used for commercial once it's out of beta stage and come with full version

[@salvafuentes5768]

Tendrias más seguidores con subtitulos en español,Por que eres muy bueno trabajando!!

[@carsamendi4994]

Apoyo la propuesta

[@cooleregg5577]

Will be interesting to see how hackers would bring this generative fill to the cracked versions

[@AndrzejJeczen]

Well, you still need to produce a decent image of a person. Charge clients accordingly for creating an amazing background.

[@buddyheph]

Does it work for iPad Pro ?

[@psdesireYT]

Not yet, but you can utilize the Adobe Express website.

[@dollmaker365]

AI is not meant to be used without any thoughts. You should use it as a tool which guides you on your way.

[@TheGamingChad.]

is it really a tool when 90% has become automated? that's like using aimbot on call of duty, anybody can be a pro

[@dollmaker365]

@@TheGamingChad. Its like easy to use but hard to get it use properly for now, Use it and try to look closer on those generated Photos, they almost have everytime reflection failures or lightning failures, also you hardly can choose what to be exactly is in your Photo its more like a gambling if you like it or not and thats not how you can use it for sell tbh, for now, professional editing skills are more needed than ever. :)

[@ramonares1]

Super job!!

[@kenjavier8603]

Future!

[@samekogan]

People praising this new technology are poor photographers that have no actual skillset other than clicking a few buttons.

[@letzUploadit]

Nice video but sorry i do not agree with your statement, Photography for me is not dead it's actually opposite AI has opned many more doors for me which i can use those toold to make amazing art, people can look at it as glass half empty or full. I think its a step in the right direction.

[@valorantacemiyimben]

boy sitting, below the tree, beautifull sunset in background, florews, grass, field, water, cinematic, different types of flowers

[@antonyollatupuram5602]

Thank you

[@Natacha1111]

One question, are the Kodak presets in there or is it something you uploaded? Because I would have edited them in Lightroom, but if it’s already in photoshop there is no need 🙃

[@psdesireYT]

It's already in Photoshop by default 3D luts

[@Natacha1111]

@@psdesireYT ooohh I can’t wait to use them :)))

[@santoshgavali1824]

This is help for idea generation

[@DuckandKim]

I'm glad this is happening, the bullying that photographers use is unreal. And I'm talking about the pricing some people think they can get away with. Like overcharging people and saying they own pictures of their clients. Charging 30+ dollars for one photo, after a client pays out of their ass for a portrait package. I am so excited that I will go after more clients and not overcharge them for silly things. I wanted to support a local artist and she charged 250 dollars just because she says she's an artist. It didn't go towards and portraits or anything else. What a mess. This will also change the education in photography. We won't have to spend hundreds and thousands for products without an education. This is great news.

[@TerzicGamingRoom]

Respect, what do you do in life?

[@9thdoctor674]

I'm glad too. 8/10 of these greedy people are using cracked versions of photoshop AND complaining at the same time. Whenever I see these kids streaming on RUclips about "how bad" Ai is, I ask them to show me their adobe subscription on screen, but they can't

[@johannabubela2911]

I agree. And AI will be like fiction books, compared to historical or documentary text. There will always be a demand for the real deal. We have to just get through the phase of it being new. AI can be a great tool, even used subtly, in portrait work.

[@TheWhiteShadowStudios]

Fan of your teaching style

[@psdesireYT]

Keep watching

[@garyguest1999]

Brilliant. Thank you.

[@tristylemt]

Please give me stock in the video, thanks to the author

[@Natacha1111]

Everyone whining…consider this: it will be about the idea you have. How creative are you? Because a fool with a tool is still a fool.

[@3dbacks]

Hollywood Bollywood studios will always protect them self

[@esainpereda3081]

Mmmm… i say yes and no. I keep seeing RUclipsrs only showing it shine but they don’t show the flaws you can stumble upon . I have seen various issues and imperfections, however that being said it is just a mere tool, not an art replacement. There are still elements that cannot be created but instead manipulated or adjusted.

[@darciogusman6180]

This is fucking ridiculous.
Years of study thrown in the trash.

[@daedaluxe]

Lmao. If you can't find a way to make this work for you, that's on you. For me it's going to save me countless hours of having to find a good brush pack, texture pack, photo element for an image, mockup packs, now I can generate whatever I want tailored to how I want it to look, this has already turned my product lookbooks from already pretty good, to absolutely mindblowing, and saves me probably on average around 2 hours per page. For example one page I had of a beach scene and placed a photo I took of a quilted pillow, the designs on the quilted pillow were for a summery beach vibe. Previously I would have to look through my organised folders of .nef files I've taken over the years for a relatively good sand photo, then I wanted a shoreline at the top of the image and seashells dotted around the page. I no longer have to find the image for the sand or the image for the foamy shoreline, or images of seashells and then spend time applying them to the page and creating realistic shadows & lighting. Now I take the product photos I already have on a white background, generate the sand background, generate the foam shoreline at the top, generate the seashells, it's allowed me to translate the design ideas from my head onto the canvas with in an instant, instead of having to mess around with having to source images to composite, which can range from tedious to expensive. This is going to speed up every creatives workflow, and honestly probably remove a lot of revenue from stock websites, outside of human portraits.

[@cleretfernandes5972]

Auto is easy cookery... Reality in time is hard to.find

[@cleretfernandes5972]

No study of yours will be wasted ..your mind will treasure the settings and the scriptures.. these new bees will be so weak in their work that only the generated AI will do their jobs

[@shannonpalmer]

It blows my mind to see how people can be mad about this. I’ve worked for decades in photoshop. Hours upon hours of time wasted with making selections, trying to adapt lighting, etc etc. So now you can do it quickly. That’s awesome. All the time saved is amazing. I can get so much more work done quickly now, leaving me more time to do the things I want to do. And if you want to keep doing it the old way, guess what, you still can. People choose whether to have a positive or negative attitude about change. Be miserable if that’s what floats your boat, but plenty of people have spent the same amount of time and effort to learn to do this as you have, and are happy to have a way to save so much time now.

[@darciogusman6180]

@@cleretfernandes5972 You right bro

[@sriramsridharan661]

commercializing art . . now everybody can vomit art so that prices will be dead cheap . . $5 will be considered highly priced. silver lining is we can finish many jobs if we are able to lance as many projects as possible. need to do 3-4 variety of jobs to run our life.

[@mikeborn226]

A masterpiece?? Yoo! It is actually very satisfying to see that the result you achieved w/ this technique is just ridiculously bad. The area around the subject is not in focus, the light direction on the subject is wrong, the dark shadows behind the subject clog, the texture is wrong, and much more. This can be recognized as a badly generated image within 2 seconds. A masterpiece for real, lol.

[@i-primeproductions1517]

This doesn’t work well at all. It doesn’t change the subject to blend with the background.

[@muralibabu8993]

super sir

[@ai_and_gaming]

This is fantastic!

[@sfrancfrancnrm8640]

You said the truth

[@emirjoshuaoyama]

Thanks!❤

[@ML-gb7cn]

So who owns this new photo? Adobe?

[@fran.te_anfedo]

Nice, but I don't like it.

[@sahansamarawickrama1405]

thank....... bro

[@marcusjborg]

Love this clickbait title which is not factual. Photo editing is not dead, it is dramatically more efficient. In the same way that the computer has made office, science and countless industries far more efficient.
Additionally, creative minds who do not have the technical abilities in graphics or photography, can bring their ideas to life. It opens up more than it destroys. I agree that my work as a graphic designer and photographer is less lucrative, but not dead.

[@user-xy7bc8uw8e]

THANK YOU

[@bzibubabbzibubab420]

Yes

[@O.LEO.N]

Fuckin' love it. No more painful hours of grinding for the perfect details.

[@chino281]

i prefer more traditional or what could i say i prefer "solid skills"

[@O.LEO.N]

@@haribehappy3487 But i'm not trying to be a photographer tho, i just wanna use Photoshop to create funny looking stuff and to prank and help my friends with problems.

[@Unknown-bj7bz]

​@@haribehappy3487 storytelling while charging 100$ for potrait? Lmao

[@imafidonsuccess7096]

Ai is not killing photo editing, instead it making it better and easier

[@geddeonello94]

Almost zero creativity if you rely too much on AI.
Also, goodbye skills.

[@TheGamingChad.]

@@geddeonello94 these people are so narrow minded, that's like me saying aimbot on call of duty is just a tool, delusion!!!!!! is it really a tool when it does everything for you?

[@ZeroCool22]

Only want thing to say: "Adapt or die!"😎

[@samekogan]

Thats a weak mindset.

[@TheGamingChad.]

well, the editing community sure as hell has died, everybody can use Ai, duh

[@jdupons]

it's all very nice but you have to pay 30 euros per month for the subscription to Photoshop ..most amateur photographers can't afford that ...

[@cooleregg5577]

I use neural filters on a cracked version of PS , maybe they will bring us this too

[@FITLINE-ROHIT]

this Ai is decreased the value of Graphics designer

[@ricomx29]

totally non-sens, "photo editing is dead" , yeah if you edit 1024x1024 photo or so but for 40 Mp file or more....

[@user-qz6pw9uu4y]

This future 2024 in ps and take subscription

[@erik1836]

It makes me laugh that people here are lamenting the fact they spent "years learning" blah, blah, blah skills and now big bad Adobe has made their skills passe.
I bet the same types also bitched and complained when cars came along and replaced horses because it meant they had to grow beyond the limitations of the past, a horse and embrace the freedom - with attendant responsibilities - of owning a car!
The REAL differentiating factor between just OK, good and best will ALWAYS be true artistic talent.
Not whether you can do tedious grunt work, manual labor to get there. You'll never get rich digging a ditch.
This technology is simply saving us time; helping us cut to the chase, get to the bottom line and reach a quicker fulfillment of our artistic visions.

[@BulletTrainFan]

Bad times

[@MMPHOTOANDVIDEO]

Many artists job less in future

[@MsNellyuan]

Only if you don't know understand the limits of it . Generative fill does not scale with higher resolution atm , also given the size of very high quality / resolution picture , it is going to be really hard to transfer all that data over the cloud . We are talking about professional , print quality works here . If anything , it will help us , those of us who are specifically trained in photoshop even more . This is not an autopilot feature mind you .

[@arthunkle3213]

@@MsNellyuan You're not taking into account this is the "beta" version.

[@MsNellyuan]

@@arthunkle3213 what are you talking about ? Beta or not , You still need to overcome the limit of bandwidth . This has nothing to do with the AI itself , but the infrastructure of the internet . I work with 8k and 16k prints almost daily , you want to download 16k print img over the cloud ? Good luck . Perhaps in another decade , but then the print quality might have increased to 32k , 64k and so on , the chase never stop . There is a reason why they are limiting it to 1080p now . Nobody in the professional industry is asking for 1080p . Even those casual promo poster you saw from Netflix , they would ask for 8-16k version .

[@arthunkle3213]

@@MsNellyuan I've been working in photoshop 40 hours per week for 30 years, the program didn't even have layers when I started using it in 1990. This advancement of AI in photoshop is bigger than anything the program has ever seen... by a long shot, it's not even close. It is in it's absolute infancy with a rate of development that will be unprecedented. The majority of images and files being used commercially are not 16K or 32K, that is a niche. There are thousands of photoshop tutorials on youtube teaching techniques, I don't recall very many talking about working with 32K images. Remember dialup internet, or using photoshop on a Macintosh Quadra 700 with a 25 MHz processor, 4 MB of RAM, with a 1.44 MB floppy disk drive? I remember running a gaussian blur on a 65mb photoshop image and just walking away from the computer for 40 minutes to see the result.
The technology will easily find a way around any limits of bandwidth through algorithms much in the same way that LZW compression works. MMPHOTOANDVIDEO's comment is spot on, designers and graphic artists will be out of work. The BBC recently did a piece on AI and pointed out the first jobs to be replaced will be graphic and visual artists, this is a fact. You simply won't need them to process and complete complex tasks because highly skilled people will no longer be needed to complete them, and the time taken will now take minutes not hours. Adobe hit a homerun for sales here, ordinarily the only folks buying photoshop were limited to professional designers and graphic artists. Now anyone can create complex composites, extend backgrounds and make edits with almost zero understanding of layers, masking, channels, paths, etc. A whole new clientele of buyers are available to them now.

[@MentalitaHrvatska]

photoediting isn't dead, raws still look shit and you gotta develop em. Finding good compositions, caring about the background, all the technical stuff behind taking pictures, this is what's dead.

[@MsNellyuan]

Photo editing is dead ? How much are you paid to say that ? Or another clickbait videos ? It isn't perfect , far from it . If you are doing print quality work , you still seriously need to redraw the edge to blend in . Also it can't seem to upscale at higher resolution , which means post production work are required .
It does speed up the process , but it doesn't KILL photo editing . If you have no foundation training in photoshop , you are still going to struggle .

[@littleboat888]

Adobe will be the next Kodak, shoot one self in the leg !
.
( kodak invented digital camera and caused the end of it's own film business empire )

[@smartideaslifehacks]

You are dead not photoshop .

[@richards6065]

It looks fake

[@budekins542]

The king is dead. Long live the king.

[@johnsmith-lb4mo]

Ai is a talentless pursuit, long live manual processing!!

[@ramabargava]

why still need manual processing, meanwhile AI can generate is faster

[@johnsmith-lb4mo]

@@ramabargava It may be faster but there is no skill on the part of the artist, it's all done with a machine and code.

[@ramabargava]

@@johnsmith-lb4mo depends on customer needed, market needed

[@rianibanezer3742]

AI make You lack on skill.
better manual, mastering tool for best complex editing.