Solving Quadratic Inequality

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 окт 2024
  • Using the algebraic method with the number line testing.
    Interval notation covered

Комментарии • 59

  • @smichels5117
    @smichels5117 6 месяцев назад +8

    Extremely thorough and clear, as always! Thank you, Mr. H!

  • @amramjose
    @amramjose 4 месяца назад

    I am reviewing pre calc, this is very clear and well explained. Thanks, Professor.

  • @edbreedon9456
    @edbreedon9456 6 месяцев назад +2

    I like your method - makes a lot sense

  • @patriciaceli1536
    @patriciaceli1536 6 месяцев назад +4

    Thank you, thank you! ❤

  • @leilaspooks
    @leilaspooks 14 дней назад

    love it! Thanks Mr. H

  • @saidtoumicanadian7761
    @saidtoumicanadian7761 6 месяцев назад +4

    Thank you so much ❤

  • @kennethferro729
    @kennethferro729 6 месяцев назад +4

    which chalk do you use? It marks so nicely!

  • @abshariadam
    @abshariadam 4 месяца назад +1

    To make it easier, you can just find yes or no on one side then it will be either "yes-no-yes" or "no-yes-no"

  • @Patyx42
    @Patyx42 6 месяцев назад +5

    weird method, easier to just sketch the parabola through -3 and 2 and mark the positive and negative areas

    • @mariuszmroowa1145
      @mariuszmroowa1145 6 месяцев назад

      Of course, it is the fastest method

    • @KAKAROT12374
      @KAKAROT12374 4 месяца назад

      Sometimes it doesn't work trust me

  • @mohammadsajadyazdanbakhshi7388
    @mohammadsajadyazdanbakhshi7388 5 месяцев назад +1

    I like it so much and it's very good.

  • @el-purr
    @el-purr 5 месяцев назад

    I usually, if x^2 without the "-" represent a parabola with branches up, the roots are an intersection with the "x" axis. in this case, it is a parabola with branches upwards, which intersects the "x" axis at points -3 and 2, therefore x = (-inf; -3] and [2; inf)

  • @SamuelAdomakoBamfi
    @SamuelAdomakoBamfi 3 месяца назад

    Prof has reminded me of my 1st degree mathematics

  • @dededieuleveult1191
    @dededieuleveult1191 6 месяцев назад +3

    According to Hörner method I found (x+2)(x-3) thanks

  • @edw2
    @edw2 2 месяца назад

    Very good. Thank you Sir

  • @futuregenerationinstitute9613
    @futuregenerationinstitute9613 5 месяцев назад

    Could you please drop another one showing parallelogram properties using diagonals and their formulas in terms of perimeter, area, and the side lengths. Thank you.

  • @sameeralhaidary8283
    @sameeralhaidary8283 3 месяца назад

    Also we can write the solution as :
    R \ (-3,2)
    Real numbers except numbers inside the period (-3.2)

  • @maxpie16
    @maxpie16 4 месяца назад

    i had thought of this method too!

  • @vijaykumar-r8j2t
    @vijaykumar-r8j2t 5 месяцев назад

    Sir in some trignometric equations of simplification we multiply by minus 1 in denominator.what kind of operation is it?

  • @aliyounis941
    @aliyounis941 6 месяцев назад

    Will you ever do a real or complex analysis series? or any advanced topics?

  • @EstherChoe-mv5xp
    @EstherChoe-mv5xp 5 месяцев назад

    선생님! 유튭에서 보다니 너무 반가워요😊

  • @Raiñelle-i2r
    @Raiñelle-i2r 3 месяца назад

    Thank you!!❤

  • @aku7598
    @aku7598 5 месяцев назад

    I normally see alternate value between greater and less than zero for the sections.

  • @mathpro926
    @mathpro926 5 месяцев назад

    thank you
    i like your explain

  • @Mycroft616
    @Mycroft616 5 месяцев назад

    This is actually a great time to go back to completing the square and stress that (x^2)^(1/2) = |x|.
    x^2 + x - 6 ≥ 0
    x^2 + x - 6 + 6 ≥ 0 + 6
    x^2 + x ≥ 6
    4(x^2 + x) ≥ 4(6)
    4x^2 + 4x ≥ 24
    4x^2 + 4x + 1 ≥ 24 + 1
    (2x + 1)^2 ≥ 25
    (2x + 1)^2 ≥ 5^2
    [(2x + 1)^2]^(1/2) ≥ (5^2)^(1/2)
    |2x + 1| ≥ |5|
    At this point, using the nature of absolute value, we can redefine this as two simple inequalities.
    2x + 1 ≥ 5
    2x + 1 - 1 ≥ 5 - 1
    2x ≥ 4
    2x/2 ≥ 4/2
    x ≥ 2
    2x + 1 ≤ -5
    2x + 1 - 1 ≤ -5 - 1
    2x ≤ -6
    2x/2 ≤ -6/2
    x ≤ -3
    Put them together and we have our domain without the need to check the groups that crop up around the x values. We _should_ check, but we have our notation without that step.
    (-∞, -3] ∪ [2, ∞)

  • @aarav5736
    @aarav5736 25 дней назад +1

    Why not the quadratic equation?

  • @JulesMoyaert_photo
    @JulesMoyaert_photo 6 месяцев назад +1

    👍🙏

  • @n_ow2808
    @n_ow2808 6 месяцев назад +5

    Any class 10th student here ?
    👇

  • @harrymatabal8448
    @harrymatabal8448 6 месяцев назад

    Very good. I would have used s rough parabola

  • @Nexxer850
    @Nexxer850 25 дней назад

    XE(♾️,3] U [2, ♾️)😊

  • @stevenjohnson1143
    @stevenjohnson1143 6 месяцев назад

    X is greater than or equal to -2 or less than or equal to 3

  • @Bananasgtag
    @Bananasgtag 6 месяцев назад +1

    goated

  • @enfiniitee
    @enfiniitee 5 месяцев назад

    That's seems like wavy curved method

  • @Learnmathematics-de6bg
    @Learnmathematics-de6bg 6 месяцев назад

    Noted

  • @831Billy
    @831Billy 3 месяца назад +1

    Thanks. Haven’t done math for many decades. I was an ace then. I love your videos as I totally follow what you are explaining. I know I still have it. Too bad my life is almost done. Hoping for math after death.

    • @charliebamford2807
      @charliebamford2807 Месяц назад

      I am old too! I find some parts of math difficult (e.g. statistics) but my biggest problem is that I very quickly forget what I've learnt. Lots of practice required. Good luck. Mr H certainly helps!

    • @831Billy
      @831Billy Месяц назад

      @@charliebamford2807 My life is almost done but I’m not that old

  • @safetyseeker
    @safetyseeker 6 месяцев назад

    Easy peasy

  • @charlielobello5014
    @charlielobello5014 5 месяцев назад

    All numbers are greater than or equal to 0. Numbers aren't assumed with a negative sign. So all numbers 0 through 9 are equal to or greater than 0. You don't need math to figure that one out. He just is creating more confusion. I'm pretty sure that's what the purpose of all this is anyway. What I mean by all of this is the confusion that were debating nonsense over and over and over again. So from the hierarchy perspective it's working we're fighting amongst ourselves debating amongst ourselves arguing amongst ourselves while they're digging for gold

    • @TristanLoh4200
      @TristanLoh4200 5 месяцев назад

      Bro he's just showing the proof of why the answer is as it is... Sometimes you just can't understand math problems at first glance

  • @Nexxer850
    @Nexxer850 25 дней назад

    Its more easier use wavy curve method

  • @ChavoMysterio
    @ChavoMysterio 4 месяца назад

    x²+x-6[>=]0
    (x+3)(x-2)[>=]0
    x+3=0
    x=-3
    x-2=0
    x=2
    When x=-4
    (-4)²+(-4)-6[>=]0
    16-4-6[>=]0
    6[>=]0 true
    When x=0
    0²+0-6[>=]0
    -6[>=]0 false
    When x=3
    3²+3-6[>=]0
    9+3-6[>=]0
    6[>=]0 true
    Therefore
    x[=]2 ❤

  • @SYAN23SYAN13
    @SYAN23SYAN13 6 месяцев назад

    Mengapa gambar mininya menampilkan

  • @dzung1969
    @dzung1969 5 месяцев назад +8

    Easier just sketching a gragh

  • @DanielRamires-cw8sd
    @DanielRamires-cw8sd 4 месяца назад

    654×7=4578😢

  • @nodistraction5857
    @nodistraction5857 6 месяцев назад

    Can anyone send me the syllabus of Grade12 mathematics

    • @jamesharmon4994
      @jamesharmon4994 6 месяцев назад +1

      That is determined by the school district or possibly the state.

    • @nodistraction5857
      @nodistraction5857 6 месяцев назад

      @@jamesharmon4994 do you have the syllabus??? Or only school can give,, is there any website so that I can download from it.
      Thank you for telling me

    • @jamesharmon4994
      @jamesharmon4994 5 месяцев назад

      @nodistraction5857 the school has it. Ask them for it.

    • @carultch
      @carultch 5 месяцев назад

      @@nodistraction5857 Every school and every class within the school, has a completely different syllabus. The general public a thousand miles away, will know nothing about your class's specific syllabus.

  • @emanknight4934
    @emanknight4934 6 месяцев назад +1

    wrong