Tap to unmute

Can Germany ramp up its lithium supply lines? | DW News

Share
Embed
  • Published on Dec 1, 2024
  • The EU depends on China for materials critical to the green transition, but wants to strengthen its own supply chain. One minerals producer is set to start processing lithium in Germany in 2024. What obstacles does it face in ramping up production?
    #criticalminerals #supplychain #dwbusiness
    Subscribe: www.youtube.co...
    For more news go to: www.dw.com/en/
    Follow DW on social media:
    ►Facebook: / deutschewellenews
    ►Twitter: / dwnews
    ►Instagram: / dwnews
    ►Twitch: / dwnews_hangout
    Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: / dwdeutsch

Comments • 69

  • @christianweibrecht6555
    @christianweibrecht6555 4 months ago +13

    Forward thinking to for the EU reduce dependence upon mineral imports

    • @temper44
      @temper44 4 months ago

      Yes, by buying their lithium from the EU country Brazil.

  • @eltonbritt1502
    @eltonbritt1502 3 months ago +1

    The main hindrance are those people who call themselves "environmentalists". China doesn't have problem with these kinds of people.

  • @dissaid
    @dissaid 4 months ago +3

    Yes.

  • @bojanm986
    @bojanm986 4 months ago

    Of course it can. Schulz came to Serbia on previous week to force mining, although the people are protesting it and are against it. But you would not write about it...

  • @konata5628
    @konata5628 3 months ago

    You know its more about profit than environmentalism when theyre talking about one of the most ecologically devastating minerals to mine as a "positive for the EU" 🙃

  • @apollo209
    @apollo209 4 months ago +1

    The music when Alice Yu spoke was way too loud!

  • @El.Duder-ino
    @El.Duder-ino 2 months ago

    If EU with Germany in lead wants to successfully compete and survive Chinese unmatched battery industry including EVs, it must do it on mass scale with large EU subsidies. There's simply no other way to compete with China's value mix with low prices and already above average quality. China has planned this industry change for a very long time to become even more dependent and relevant world economy to one day win over USA and western world. Western world needs to become competitive with China otherwise China will own and manufacture everything. It already does most of the stuff world needs, so some kind of political balance must be created and agreed on. In my opinion EU needs to do both, find right agreement with China and develop its own battery and electric industry. All of that needs a lot of time and money, something what China did very well from 2000s in order to dominate the world. Maybe Germany and EU should start learning from that!

  • @BieZhang
    @BieZhang 3 months ago

    Why should people worry about China's dominance on this industry? China is always willing to sell batteries at a cheap price to the EU countries, provided that the EU does not sanction China for unifying Taiwan.

    • @playnochat
      @playnochat Month ago

      There are million ways for China to lose face and Taiwan isn't even the biggest concern. It has been shown that China is as reckless as Russia and decoupling between China and western countries is unavoidable at this point.

  • @j.lietka9406
    @j.lietka9406 4 months ago +1

    Is the raw Lithium (From Brazil) of a reasonable quality? Is this battery plant also looking into new types of batteries? Danke u. Viele Gluck! ❤🇩🇪

  • @ali3nw0r1d6
    @ali3nw0r1d6 4 months ago +2

    Forget Serbian Lithium! 🇷🇸

  • @GraniteInTheFace
    @GraniteInTheFace 4 months ago

    Does EU want to?

  • @maxfmfdm
    @maxfmfdm 4 months ago

    RUclips blocks way normal comments now its crazy.

  • @johnd6913
    @johnd6913 4 months ago

    Kingsley

  • @Wiers75q
    @Wiers75q 4 months ago +4

    Germany needs to do a lot to build its secure supply chain, such as making its own lithium batteries, producing its own oil, and making its own nuclear materials.
    Of course, the simplest thing is to build a virtual machine Germany based on the United States, with Troy von der Leyen acting as its agent.

  • @mdsaifulislamnirob19
    @mdsaifulislamnirob19 4 months ago

    Save Bangladesh students

  • @Itzvep
    @Itzvep 4 months ago +1

    I am looking for a good relationship is anyone single here?

  • @jeddaniels2283
    @jeddaniels2283 4 months ago

    European mineral wealth

  • @sylvias2062
    @sylvias2062 4 months ago +1

    Incinerator devices built into
    EVS , Mobile Phones etc .
    The Fire Department is working frantically on Water Tanks big enough to extinguish Lithium Battery Fires .

  • @urbansenicar81
    @urbansenicar81 4 months ago

    So. Youve no ore, no factory and the product is cheap?

  • @zabababa9969
    @zabababa9969 3 months ago

    NE KOPANJU LITIJUMA U SRBIJI 🇷🇸🇷🇸🇷🇸✌️✌️✌️🇷🇸🇷🇸🇷🇸
    RIO TINTO MRŠ IZ SRBIJE
    If you need lithium so much, dig it in your own backyard.

  • @dissaid
    @dissaid 4 months ago

    😎😎😎

  • @gracchusbabeuf9868
    @gracchusbabeuf9868 4 months ago

    These aspirations can be fulfilled only if Europe becomes a Federation. Current European states including Germany must transform to regional authorities.

    • @sebastianeckert1947
      @sebastianeckert1947 4 months ago +2

      Why can a German company not process lithium without dissolving the key political unit of our time, the nation state?

    • @gracchusbabeuf9868
      @gracchusbabeuf9868 4 months ago

      @@sebastianeckert1947 Because nation states and their ruling classes have different and conflicting interests. Often they are trying to undermine each other. Only a federal united Europe could compete with USA and China. Otherwise the short sighted "national" interests will make Europe irrelevant.

    • @sebastianeckert1947
      @sebastianeckert1947 3 months ago

      @@gracchusbabeuf9868 It's a fair discussion to have, but "processing lithium" is too specific an issue to make it a condition of - Lithium can be processed in many different political contexts, is all I'm saying.

  • @aleserban9322
    @aleserban9322 4 months ago +3

    without BRICKS , partly Russia will be every natural resources excessively expensive, EU will not be price competitive and for us , inhabitants in EU too expensive, there will be poverty

    • @dzurfluh2156
      @dzurfluh2156 4 months ago +4

      😂

    • @martins3885
      @martins3885 4 months ago

      ​@@dzurfluh2156he also probably thinks that the EU will freeze this winter too 😂

  • @Moabi4
    @Moabi4 4 months ago +18

    😂 wishful thinking. The EU had access to cheap resources in Russia and decided to self sabotage for US imperialism. 🤦🏾‍♂️

    • @dzurfluh2156
      @dzurfluh2156 4 months ago +19

      Prefer Russian imperialism? Good luck with that.

    • @jamesgrover2005
      @jamesgrover2005 4 months ago +2

      Yes just give Putin what he wants and then he will stop
      /EndSarcasm
      Edit: I guess you forgot Putin was holding Europe's energy supply to ransom?
      Yeah always a good idea to partner with Russia 🤦‍♂️ask the oil companies how reliable Russia is as a partner.

    • @robwyyi
      @robwyyi 4 months ago +5

      Great logic. America the evil capitalist. Could this more of Russian disinformation or just illogic of a individual

    • @Adityabikramnayak
      @Adityabikramnayak 4 months ago +1

      In fact they would try to make Trump lose American elections, cause he might go easy on Russia ।

    • @maxfmfdm
      @maxfmfdm 4 months ago +2

      Bro Russia is the imperialist aggressor and the US and allies are the defenders of freedom and peace. These facts need to be stated.

  • @FedericoTesta1
    @FedericoTesta1 4 months ago

    EU secured it's future resources thanks to Ukraine. Cheap labour and resources to exploit.

  • @joelharris4399
    @joelharris4399 4 months ago +3

    Can anyone strong enough in the West withstand the might of the Red Dragon, awakening from its slumbers?

    • @a0flj0
      @a0flj0 4 months ago +4

      The red dragon has made some mistakes that will cause it to slowly diminish into irrelevancy.
      First, they stopped the one child per family too late. Right now, China is in a demographic crisis that cannot be averted. In a few decades, its population will be half of what it is now. And, what's worse, more aged than that of Western Europe.
      Second, it wasn't able to escape the middle income trap. It has developed quickly, following Deng's reforms, a few decades ago, into the manufacturing hub of the world. In the manufacturing sector, it is really top notch - no other country has similar knowledge in that area. However, it hasn't significantly automated its manufacturing sector, nor was it able to develop truly advanced technology. The vast majority of Chinese citizen still live in the countryside, in abject poverty. The few hundred millions in cities are mostly employed in low paying manufacturing jobs. Only a tiny fraction, compared to China's population, is working in high paying, knowledge-driven jobs. Even if China's population is huge, and its number of STEAM graduates, as an absolute value, is also huge, as a percentage of its population it is a bit low, compared to most other developed countries.
      Third - this being what stopped Chinese growth in its tracks - Xi reverted all of Deng's reforms. China is slowly returning to a strictly centrally planned economy, with no free market mechanisms, as the Chinese private sector is increasingly harshly milked by the Chinese government for money.
      These three things combined make for the perfect storm. An aging population can't drive a manufacturing-based economy. You need young, strong and physically fit workers for manufacturing. As you age, you inevitably become slower and weaker, your eyesight becomes poorer, your manual abilities decrease - and you're no longer effective at assembling circuit boards or machine parts, nor does your back allow you to carry heavier weights. Low income jobs don't motivate people to get married and make children. In fact, that's a recognized problem in China - young people no longer get married, and even if they do, almost none of them stick to the new policy of three children per family. This is what's going to abruptly reduce China's population and cause it to age massively, over the next few decades. Also, with Deng's reforms reverted, the state no longer has money for social programs, and as such there's little financial incentives that the state can provide for would-be parents.
      On top of all this there's a slow but steady process triggered by the pandemic and sustained by Xi's restrictive, business-unfriendly counter-reform. Foreign companies move part of their business out of China and back home - usually the part that's most technologically advanced and paying most. Also, since China has become more expensive than neighboring countries, while at it, they move other, less well paying and more labor intensive parts of their businesses into cheaper neighboring countries. The rate at which this is happening is slow, but steady, causing a similarly slow but steady decrease of business in China, leaving the state with even less money.
      That's a pretty full plate for the single party to deal with. There really isn't any solution to at least the demographic problem and there's zero political will to address the other problems, as this would loosen the grip of the single party over the country. This causes another problem: autocratic rule is always associated with a high level of corruption - which China is rife with, which further amplifies China's problems.
      They're now living off the growth and reserves that have been built up in the decades since Deng was in power. Once those are finished, they'll do what soviet Russia did in the nineties last century: go bankrupt. It took the soviets several decades to waste all that they plundered in Germany and Eastern Europe after WW2 (scientists and skilled workers included) and what they got during the war from the UK and the US. China will also have some time before its resources run out. But it _will_ happen, the same way it happened with the soviets.

    • @JigilJigil
      @JigilJigil 4 months ago +1

      It's actually a Red Lizard pretending to be the Red Dragon.

    • @a0flj0
      @a0flj0 4 months ago +1

      @@JigilJigil It absolutely had the potential to be the mightiest dragon there ever was one. But it squandered it, by not adapting to the times. It attempted to stay an imperial power when the entire world around it switched to democracy. No democracy is perfect, and especially some in China's neighborhood are very far from perfect. But any democracy is performing better, economically, than even the best led autocracy.

    • @Tdawg99981
      @Tdawg99981 4 months ago

      @@a0flj0read your take. Load of rubbish. Have u ever read the counter points to your arguments?

    • @JigilJigil
      @JigilJigil 4 months ago

      @@a0flj0 That's true.

  • @silentstormstudio4782
    @silentstormstudio4782 4 months ago +2

    Lol the greatest mega EV producing factories are destined to be in india

    • @AnimeLingri
      @AnimeLingri 4 months ago +2

      Nice dream. Keep dreaming

    • @silentstormstudio4782
      @silentstormstudio4782 4 months ago +1

      @@AnimeLingri bruh u want eauropean cars spending your half life's salaries lol

  • @arnymala
    @arnymala 4 months ago

    SaveBangladeshiStudents 🇧🇩

  • @robwyyi
    @robwyyi 4 months ago +2

    Absurdity, much like lithium in Ukraine part of reason for war . When in fact what is there is equivalent to one year worth of the largest S. American lithium mine production. Which would make it unprofitable to mine. Lithium in these proven and unproven reserve not going anywhere.

  • @Nehas949
    @Nehas949 4 months ago

    As Indian, i can see why German Shepherd bark so much on us.