*👉Checkout Previous Compilation:* ruclips.net/video/HA8g2UIwAOE/видео.html *👉Submit your Dashcam video for the feature:* forms.gle/dMhP9qznKL11NLii6 *👉Or sent to Email:* megadrivingschoolyt@gmail.com *👉Recommended best value dashcam:* bit.ly/2GAF2GZ
I think the law should be more strict when it comes to uninsured drivers. Just a ticket and slap to the hand is not enough. No wonder there's so many people who don't pay insurance.
Uninsured drivers that commit hit and run should have their cars confiscated, sold at auction and the remaining repair costs to the injured party should come out of their wages, social security, welfare etc. until this claim is paid in full.
Maybe make it illegal to drive uninsured? Cannot get plate tags, plates, renewals, transfer into your name etc. unless there is proof of insurance and make the fine for being caught driving without insurance something outrageous like $2000 - then when something like this happens where they ran the plates and found it uninsured the guy still gets a hefty fine.
@@MrBattlecharge We already have that. People will buy six months of insurance, renew the car, and then cancel the insurance a week later, getting a refund for 5.5 months.
@@darrennew8211 In Florida if you cancel your insurance they report it to DMV which will revoke your tags if you don't produce proof of new insurance, if you are caught driving a uninsured vehicle your licence will be suspended and the car impounded
2:45 To be fair, on-ramps like this are *absolutely horrible*. There should be an additional lane where you can safely get up to speed and merge with existing traffic. It shouldn't be controlled with a yield sign _(if that's what that is)._
@@mau4604 My dad once rear ended someone like this. They were at the kind where they have the Red/Yellow/Green to signal when cars can go down the ramp to get up to speed. The woman driving got near the end of the ramp and decided their speed wasn't high enough to merge so they had stopped and started backing up the ramp to "start again". Meanwhile my dad had gotten his green light and so he was watching the main traffic on his left to find his spot to merge when he saw her backing up, so he stopped but then she kept backing up and backed right into him. He was found at fault. Naturally, rear ending someone is almost always the fault of the person in the rear, but she had admitted to fault when it was just the two of them, but when the cops came she lied and said they were both going down the ramp when he rear ended her. But this was back in like the 80s, well before dash cams were a common consumer item.
I am the driver at 7:09 I have since removed the blue film, I didn't even notice it until you guys said something. I thought the camera just made it look blue because of the overcast day. lol
While I agree sometimes, some of them happen within three feet of their own bumper. Don't know how you expect them to avoid it. Not to mention, you cannot expect every idiot on the road.
7:34 * I clearly see the truck slowly (albeit, blindly) turning into my lane and about to hit me so I guess I’ll just pit maneuver it instead of slightly hitting the brake and avoid the collision *
Not to mention "the blinker was behind my a-pillar... but I also can't see that there is a flash red light SOMEWHERE to my side. Those aren't dim these days.
Clearly everybody under this comment drives a Chevy Spark and holds up lanes 😂 big cars (like that SUV or my Ram1500) have big A-pillars. Sunlight can’t shine through metal so that turn signal damn sure won’t either. He shouldn’t have been driving slow enough in the left lane to be overtaken anyways 🤦🏽♀️
Though I agree with that assessment it is still on the merging vehicle to be sure it's clear TO merge and that guy didn't so he doesn't get off the hook. It's both their fault.
2:43 Never assume the car in front of you has went just because you saw an opportunity in which they could have gone. There's not even a point in looking until the car in front is gone because as long as they're still there, you can't go.
I doubt that it hurt the truck so no reason for them to worry about it and who knows what the at fault driver was thinking. Maybe they were drunk/high, had warrants or no insurance. Could be a lot of things.
@@mikesmith-po8nd all the more reason for a police report, or have police respond to the scene. Someone having warrants, or worse driving drunk/high is not a reason to not call the police. But yeah certainly looks like the sedan certainly got majority if not all the damage lol.
5:30 Red van had plenty of time to go before the cammer even entered the roundabout. It’s not a stop sign for a reason. I hate when people stop at roundabouts when they do not have to. It’s not that complicated.
Yeah, it reminded me of the animal training rule that you don't punish the pet after something is over. Like if a dog chewed up some shoes you wouldn't just go up and spank it, or use the shock collar, or whatever you do for punishment. They have to know what the punishment is connected to. So with the dog you'd have to basically shove their face in it so they know what it is they're being punished for so they know not to do it again. Obviously the offender in the truck in this clip had no idea what he did wrong, so the honking meant nothing.
I think what happened was that dude tried to make a u-turn across the path of the car in the left lane. When they honked at him, he got out to road rage.
On the last one.....YES IT IS. The turner is just supposed to yield to traffic in the regular lane and merge when safe, which this guy wasn't going to do.
(Pilot speeds down a taxiway and tries to cut in front of another plane) "That Delta A320 turned out of the ramp right in front of me, so I had to teach him a lesson!" Ground controller in tower:: "I have a phone number for you, advise when ready to copy..."
@@budgetbuilt8838 I'm the first to admit there's not nearly enough data there to get a really good estimate, but from what IS there I put him at 43MPH - clocked from when he passed the middle of the 'X' in front of the cammer to where he crossed the far side of the crosswalk took 14 frames of video. The speed limit on Broad St. is 25.
Did you not see the SUV cut off the car? Doesn't matter what speed the the Impala was going, they had the right of way. Speed is not a factor, right of way is.
I think the keyword is "was". It's not "where they will have been" (as in where they are at that moment). It's a guarantee that they'll either full stop, or continue forward, but never suddenly pop it in reverse like the ball in Pong hitting a paddle. The problem then is if where they were was in oncoming traffic because then you're just asking for a head on collision.
Probably just wasn't used to pulling a trailer and miscalculated the stopping distance. Or possibly too much tongue weight and it lifted the front wheels of the truck enough that they weren't getting enough traction to help with the braking.
@Falcon2 why did they swerve so hard to the left then, it wasn't from braking, they must have had SOME sort of instinctual urge to turn the wheel to the left.
@Falcon2 that was the worse decision she could have made at the moment, because as I stated before, the didn't apply adequate braking for the situation and then compiles it by yanking the wheel TOWARDS the obstruction in front of her
That was so cool I live 15 minutes from that Warminster video it's really nice to see some videos from where I live in Bucks County I wish there was a lot more
A lot of failure to yield events would not even happen, if the person making the right turn simply accelerated a little more briskly to traffic speed rather than expecting people to adapt to their pace.
2:35 Ok..a guy dressed all black, with a ski mask pulls in front of me blocking my way, at a green light and gets aggressive....i'm assuming its a carjacking and running him over. Screw that. You want to dress like that and play stupid traffic games? You win stupid prizes.
8:30 Cammer is the one who needs to learn that the dual turn lane is supposed to be used to merge onto the roadway. Missouri § 300.215 says that the two-way left turn lane is to be used to make a left turn from "or into the roadway" and the other driver can use it for up to 500 feet. Cammer was wrong for honking at the other car.
The other car was about to merge unsafely, tires already crossing the line. This was the perfect use of the horn to prevent a collision. I'm also fine with accelerating before merging. It's the safest way to merge as long as you look around properly, which every driver should always be doing anyway.
You're 100% wrong. That middle lane is only for getting out of the main road so you can slow down and turn onto the side street or parking lot or what ever. It's never intended as a merge lane, you're supposed to slow down in that lane, not speed up. If you do that, I'm not slowing down or speeding up to let you in.
@@noremacsnibbor8914 Bro, I included a cite to the Missouri statute that covers the two-way left turn lane. Missouri § 300.215 expressly says you can use it to turn into the roadway and drive in it for up to 500 feet.
I learned a new move in Detroit. You swerve violently into the lane you want, return to your lane and then carefully signal your intention. By the time you make your intended lane change, the interfering vehicle is 500 feet back recovering from a heart attack.
It's funny how much the Apillar gets blamed for not moving your head and eyes to just be aware of your surroundings. I don't keep my head in one fixed position while driving, I'm constantly on the lookout for others, paying attention to where I'm going.
Exactly! I'm teaching my 15 year old to drive. I told him you always want to be aware of your surroundings, and think of what your escape plan would be if someone else made a bad decision.
1:37 the grey vehicle would’ve been partially at fault in my book for driving too fast 4:59 the context for this clip and the one before were accidentally switched
Dear all video submitters.... We get it! Dashcams have a wide angle lens! Anyone who owns one already knows this. And anyone who doesn't own one, chances are they already know this too.
Why do people feel the need to take four lanes to execute a u turn? You realistically only need three, and e ven then just use two and make a three point turn since the oncoming lane should be empty anyway. Otherwise you get accidents like @3:30
@Falcon2 I was just saying glad to see the police cams at the end keep it up....every episode after that no police cams. No big deal I just thought it was funny.
As for the last video, in many states, left turn lane can be used as a merge lane. Such as Michigan allows you to drive in the left turn lane for up to 500 feet for that purpose. V-card depicted in this video however doesn't know how to use it in that manner. As they clearly tried to merge over without waiting for you to get past them first.
Story time: I’ve actually witnessed someone use the turning lane as their personal lane. I’m just thankful no one needed to use it to turn cause it would have been a headon collision at 55mph. Drivers do some weird things 😅
@Falcon2 Now I can see that the green car is lined up with the red light which means he ran the light and moved to one of the through lanes. The road curves to the right here and makes the lights miss align with the cars, But the Green light facing traffic on the left now makes no sense.
@3:30 About 80,800,000 results (0.57 seconds) Generally, yes, New Jersey law states that you must file a police report after a car accident if the losses are estimated to be $500 or more. The $500 threshold includes both property damages as well as the losses incurred from any injuries.Nov 23, 2021
2:35 blacked out car with a person in all black and covering their face comes to block my car and tried to hop out on me. No thank you, you can get ran over ain’t getting shot today
Most states I've driven through use a solid red on the left turn signal. Very few use a red arrow. Texas used to use a double solid red on their turn signals to make them more identifiable, although lately I've seen more red arrows in use instead.
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 133 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8DL7rjONMGM/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 133 [USA & Canada Only]](/img/tr.png)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 135 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wyD5XEhKI6k/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 131 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/OEfp2poii0g/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 137 [USA & Canada Only]](/img/1.gif)
*👉Checkout Previous Compilation:* ruclips.net/video/HA8g2UIwAOE/видео.html
*👉Submit your Dashcam video for the feature:* forms.gle/dMhP9qznKL11NLii6
*👉Or sent to Email:* megadrivingschoolyt@gmail.com
*👉Recommended best value dashcam:* bit.ly/2GAF2GZ
I think the law should be more strict when it comes to uninsured drivers. Just a ticket and slap to the hand is not enough. No wonder there's so many people who don't pay insurance.
You take them to small claims court for damages.
Yea, registration on the vehicle should be suspended for 6 months. Plus physical harm and jail time.
@@josephshermill199 perfect. Pay filing fees, legal fees, spend days out of work, get a judgment against them, and... they never pay. Perfect system.
@@matthewbowen5841 shhhh you’re making to much sense. You’re going to make Jospeh’s head explode.
@@matthewbowen5841 100% accurate. Even if you decide to take them to court you would spend even more money and and time that you don't have.
Uninsured drivers that commit hit and run should have their cars confiscated, sold at auction and the remaining repair costs to the injured party should come out of their wages, social security, welfare etc. until this claim is paid in full.
If you ever run for office, you got my vote.
Maybe make it illegal to drive uninsured? Cannot get plate tags, plates, renewals, transfer into your name etc. unless there is proof of insurance and make the fine for being caught driving without insurance something outrageous like $2000 - then when something like this happens where they ran the plates and found it uninsured the guy still gets a hefty fine.
@@MrBattlecharge We already have that. People will buy six months of insurance, renew the car, and then cancel the insurance a week later, getting a refund for 5.5 months.
@@darrennew8211 I think it depends on the state. I'm Canadian where I know for sure we have that, I just know some US States don't.
@@darrennew8211 In Florida if you cancel your insurance they report it to DMV which will revoke your tags if you don't produce proof of new insurance, if you are caught driving a uninsured vehicle your licence will be suspended and the car impounded
7:15 "The car looks bluer than it was because there is a protective film over the lens for shipping."
I would like to peacefully point out an edit-error: you have the motorcycle and the guy pulling across the lanes swapped for the description box.
7:09 Here's an idea: When you install your new dashcam on your windshield, take the blue protective covering off first!
Oh boy! Another edition of "The Car Was Closer Than It Looks" and "I had to step on my breaks"
Lmao
This right here
Best comment award
Yeah, don’t give us that ‘closer than it appears’ stuff. Give me a brake.
Also more proof that honking your horn is utterly useless.
3:31 Man, that is a GREAT place to U-turn 🤦🏻
His head hurts
@@JakeStewart1343 Well it isn't like he was using it for anything but a hat rack... LOL
OMG, yes. Also, any driver that has a license plate laying on the dash is def sus. and/or stupid.
1:52 "That blue truck came out of nowhere!"
When you are time traveling from another dimension it's difficult to make a perfect transition.
2:45 To be fair, on-ramps like this are *absolutely horrible*. There should be an additional lane where you can safely get up to speed and merge with existing traffic. It shouldn't be controlled with a yield sign _(if that's what that is)._
Yeah, I hate these. To add to that, a lot of people panic freeze at these and end up holding up a line behind them.
Those are typically on older highways as remnants of the old clover-leaf design from when traffic volumes were way lower than today.
@@mau4604 My dad once rear ended someone like this. They were at the kind where they have the Red/Yellow/Green to signal when cars can go down the ramp to get up to speed. The woman driving got near the end of the ramp and decided their speed wasn't high enough to merge so they had stopped and started backing up the ramp to "start again". Meanwhile my dad had gotten his green light and so he was watching the main traffic on his left to find his spot to merge when he saw her backing up, so he stopped but then she kept backing up and backed right into him. He was found at fault. Naturally, rear ending someone is almost always the fault of the person in the rear, but she had admitted to fault when it was just the two of them, but when the cops came she lied and said they were both going down the ramp when he rear ended her. But this was back in like the 80s, well before dash cams were a common consumer item.
Isn't cheap to add lanes for every on ramp.
Almost all the on ramps where I live are like this.
I am the driver at 7:09 I have since removed the blue film, I didn't even notice it until you guys said something. I thought the camera just made it look blue because of the overcast day. lol
4:40 No YOU Drove Off Like Nothing Happened
Most of these could have been avoided if the cammer looked further than three feet in front of their own bumper.
While I agree sometimes, some of them happen within three feet of their own bumper. Don't know how you expect them to avoid it. Not to mention, you cannot expect every idiot on the road.
7:34
* I clearly see the truck slowly (albeit, blindly) turning into my lane and about to hit me so I guess I’ll just pit maneuver it instead of slightly hitting the brake and avoid the collision *
Another black truck! Back off a half a mile. Maybe he will hit something else.
Not to mention "the blinker was behind my a-pillar... but I also can't see that there is a flash red light SOMEWHERE to my side. Those aren't dim these days.
Cammer blocks pickup for no reason, then probably also complains when people change lanes without signal
Clearly everybody under this comment drives a Chevy Spark and holds up lanes 😂 big cars (like that SUV or my Ram1500) have big A-pillars. Sunlight can’t shine through metal so that turn signal damn sure won’t either.
He shouldn’t have been driving slow enough in the left lane to be overtaken anyways 🤦🏽♀️
Though I agree with that assessment it is still on the merging vehicle to be sure it's clear TO merge and that guy didn't so he doesn't get off the hook. It's both their fault.
2:43 Never assume the car in front of you has went just because you saw an opportunity in which they could have gone. There's not even a point in looking until the car in front is gone because as long as they're still there, you can't go.
3:33...no police report?!
I doubt that it hurt the truck so no reason for them to worry about it and who knows what the at fault driver was thinking. Maybe they were drunk/high, had warrants or no insurance.
Could be a lot of things.
@@mikesmith-po8nd all the more reason for a police report, or have police respond to the scene. Someone having warrants, or worse driving drunk/high is not a reason to not call the police. But yeah certainly looks like the sedan certainly got majority if not all the damage lol.
0:36 Why did you honk after you were already past him? Why did you then stop in the middle of the road?
5:30 Red van had plenty of time to go before the cammer even entered the roundabout. It’s not a stop sign for a reason. I hate when people stop at roundabouts when they do not have to. It’s not that complicated.
And yet the person thought it was okay to go when someone was right there. Don't underestimate the stupidity of people.
2:30 pretty sure that black suv is being robbed from the passenger side by the guy walking
Good catch! Ballsy lol
More likely a fast getaway pickup.
I love this channel. I definitely get some of my inspiration from it. Keep up the great work! 👍
It's amazing how many people don't know how roundabouts work.
7:09 Tyler, you seem to know everything there is to know about that dashcam, except how to remove the protective film from the lens.
3:35 never let that person drive again pls
5:23 if you burned your brakes from this they were broken anyway.
Well, she had to say something. ;)
That's just not true, if you brake hard you can smell them, that's probably what she meant.
3:25 You did not stop, but you still blocked traffic as you slowed to a crawl to rubberneck.
Awesome video!😸
7:25 I missed the car that almost swerved into me. Now that he is way past me, I think I will honk at him.
Yeah, it reminded me of the animal training rule that you don't punish the pet after something is over. Like if a dog chewed up some shoes you wouldn't just go up and spank it, or use the shock collar, or whatever you do for punishment. They have to know what the punishment is connected to. So with the dog you'd have to basically shove their face in it so they know what it is they're being punished for so they know not to do it again.
Obviously the offender in the truck in this clip had no idea what he did wrong, so the honking meant nothing.
And then make sure to let everybody know that there weren't any damages even though there was no collision.
2:37 Still trying to understand what happened here.
probably a robbery in daylight.
@@DigitalMorix doubt it
I think what happened was that dude tried to make a u-turn across the path of the car in the left lane.
When they honked at him, he got out to road rage.
@@mikesmith-po8nd But what about the ped who then hopped into the passenger side?
you won’t lol
On the last one.....YES IT IS. The turner is just supposed to yield to traffic in the regular lane and merge when safe, which this guy wasn't going to do.
5:40 roundabouts have to be THE WORST idea ever!
Cross descriptions there with the motorcycle who rear-ended the dude and the next clip
Imagine if commercial airline pilots operated their aircraft like some of these cammers operate their vehicles?
some of them do...
(Pilot speeds down a taxiway and tries to cut in front of another plane) "That Delta A320 turned out of the ramp right in front of me, so I had to teach him a lesson!"
Ground controller in tower:: "I have a phone number for you, advise when ready to copy..."
@@jonathankleinow2073 haha!
There'd be a lot of upside down planes on the side of the runway, just like there's a lot of upside down cars on the side of the freeway.
1:38 good reflexes can't overcome stupid driving - gray car appeared to be going way too fast, considering the speed of all other cars on the road.
To me it looks like the lane they swerved into was slowing, he mightve been doing 5 over but I wouldn't assume any more than that. 35 tops imo
@@budgetbuilt8838 I'm the first to admit there's not nearly enough data there to get a really good estimate, but from what IS there I put him at 43MPH - clocked from when he passed the middle of the 'X' in front of the cammer to where he crossed the far side of the crosswalk took 14 frames of video. The speed limit on Broad St. is 25.
Did you not see the SUV cut off the car? Doesn't matter what speed the the Impala was going, they had the right of way. Speed is not a factor, right of way is.
@@IKhanNot Of course it matters. The SUV looks for an opening - basing their decision on traffic moving at a reasonable speed.
Hey Group, anyone disagree with: "to avoid a collision steer/aim to were the vehicle was not to were they are going"?
I think the keyword is "was". It's not "where they will have been" (as in where they are at that moment). It's a guarantee that they'll either full stop, or continue forward, but never suddenly pop it in reverse like the ball in Pong hitting a paddle. The problem then is if where they were was in oncoming traffic because then you're just asking for a head on collision.
1:55 I'm sure there are more possible reasons other than just "asleep or drunk".
Probably just wasn't used to pulling a trailer and miscalculated the stopping distance.
Or possibly too much tongue weight and it lifted the front wheels of the truck enough that they weren't getting enough traction to help with the braking.
the one at about 3:44 looks like either total incompetence or attempted insurance scam cuz the car turns directly in front of the truck.
7:37 Cammer tried to intentionally hit the pickup truck and missed.
Yep! They wanted to PIT them
@Falcon2 why did they swerve so hard to the left then, it wasn't from braking, they must have had SOME sort of instinctual urge to turn the wheel to the left.
@Falcon2 that was the worse decision she could have made at the moment, because as I stated before, the didn't apply adequate braking for the situation and then compiles it by yanking the wheel TOWARDS the obstruction in front of her
Fancy driving 💯
That was so cool I live 15 minutes from that Warminster video it's really nice to see some videos from where I live in Bucks County I wish there was a lot more
Some of these places sure look and sound strange for “US and Canada only”
Mantap bos
5:05 California driver clearly got their license out of a cereal box.
LOL i think you got the captions for clips 13 and 14 mixed up
Sometimes that automatic emergency braking (even if it’s the chime) be coming in clutch!
A lot of failure to yield events would not even happen, if the person making the right turn simply accelerated a little more briskly to traffic speed rather than expecting people to adapt to their pace.
erm. I think you mixed up the descriptions at 4:36 and 4:55
I go thru that Martinsburg four way stop all the time. 😂
0:50 can we not include videos of people simply speeding and getting pulled over? It happens every day, who cares...
Man Hattiesburg barely has any trees still after that massive tornado 10 years ago...
2:35 Ok..a guy dressed all black, with a ski mask pulls in front of me blocking my way, at a green light and gets aggressive....i'm assuming its a carjacking and running him over. Screw that. You want to dress like that and play stupid traffic games? You win stupid prizes.
8:30 Cammer is the one who needs to learn that the dual turn lane is supposed to be used to merge onto the roadway. Missouri § 300.215 says that the two-way left turn lane is to be used to make a left turn from "or into the roadway" and the other driver can use it for up to 500 feet. Cammer was wrong for honking at the other car.
The other car was about to merge unsafely, tires already crossing the line. This was the perfect use of the horn to prevent a collision. I'm also fine with accelerating before merging. It's the safest way to merge as long as you look around properly, which every driver should always be doing anyway.
I don't doubt your cite, but that's not true everywhere. IIRC there's only a handful of states that allow it.
You're 100% wrong. That middle lane is only for getting out of the main road so you can slow down and turn onto the side street or parking lot or what ever. It's never intended as a merge lane, you're supposed to slow down in that lane, not speed up. If you do that, I'm not slowing down or speeding up to let you in.
@@noremacsnibbor8914 Bro, I included a cite to the Missouri statute that covers the two-way left turn lane. Missouri § 300.215 expressly says you can use it to turn into the roadway and drive in it for up to 500 feet.
@@neutralcommenter7800 It used to be you could only travel 200 feet in the turn lane. I didn't realize that it was recently changed.
I learned a new move in Detroit. You swerve violently into the lane you want, return to your lane and then carefully signal your intention. By the time you make your intended lane change, the interfering vehicle is 500 feet back recovering from a heart attack.
Why don't you link to the RUclips channels that you are pulling content from?
I once told someone that stop signs bordered in white are optional. Perhaps they believed me and passed it on.
@ 3:20 that Popeye's billboard caused the accident. Longing for that Popcorn Chicken.
#11. Definitely high on something.
3:15 Cammer must have slowed down to 30 mph on the highway just to look at the accident.
In fairness it's hard to know exactly what happened with a cloud of dust blown up and not able to see what is in front of them.
@@donnash5813 cammer did the right thing to slow down. who knows if a vehicle might come back on the road
that blue truck spawned out of nowhere
4:24 wrong text?
Yes, it’s for the next clip, and vice versa.
My favourite part is the dog at 5:12
3:36 was satisfying. Too bad the truck wasn't doing like 50 mph.
It's funny how much the Apillar gets blamed for not moving your head and eyes to just be aware of your surroundings. I don't keep my head in one fixed position while driving, I'm constantly on the lookout for others, paying attention to where I'm going.
Not to mention a blinking light at that distance at night is easy to notice.
@@erikwilliam1254 YES, SIR
Exactly! I'm teaching my 15 year old to drive. I told him you always want to be aware of your surroundings, and think of what your escape plan would be if someone else made a bad decision.
@@crossplainschic BING BONG
Heads are very heavy and eyes get tired of darting around all day. I try to rest mine as much as I can, especially while driving.
#9 is Winnipeg and it’s not even the worst merge on that stretch 🤦♀️
Lol it's like all these drivers came from San Antonio
Saw an idiots driver do a brake check, which resulted in serious road rage.
When the hell did idiot become a cuss word? 🙄
7:49 Lol that "Mercedes" is actually a Nissan.
Looks like the guy in the blue truck just forgot/doesn't know how to tow and came in way too hot.
1:37 the grey vehicle would’ve been partially at fault in my book for driving too fast
4:59 the context for this clip and the one before were accidentally switched
Except there would be no way to prove during an insurance claim they were speeding.
Dear all video submitters.... We get it! Dashcams have a wide angle lens! Anyone who owns one already knows this. And anyone who doesn't own one, chances are they already know this too.
6:01 it's a temp tag on a '00s Chrysler 200. Of course they're uninsured.
Why do people feel the need to take four lanes to execute a u turn? You realistically only need three, and e ven then just use two and make a three point turn since the oncoming lane should be empty anyway. Otherwise you get accidents like @3:30
Or just make 3 left turns and a right turn…definitely much safer!
Here is a tip NEVER ACCELERATE INTO A CLOSING GAP, This may help some of the halfwits.
1:00 white car doing all of that just to save a few seconds smh
I didnt know some people considered the word "idiot" a swear now.
As soon as I made a comment about the police cams, there haven't been any in a while lol.
@Falcon2 I was just saying glad to see the police cams at the end keep it up....every episode after that no police cams. No big deal I just thought it was funny.
@Falcon2 Bahaha! True, a little bit of reverse phycology. I like your thinking.
As for the last video, in many states, left turn lane can be used as a merge lane. Such as Michigan allows you to drive in the left turn lane for up to 500 feet for that purpose. V-card depicted in this video however doesn't know how to use it in that manner. As they clearly tried to merge over without waiting for you to get past them first.
Story time: I’ve actually witnessed someone use the turning lane as their personal lane. I’m just thankful no one needed to use it to turn cause it would have been a headon collision at 55mph. Drivers do some weird things 😅
6:42 ... Why does the left turn lane have a green, the number 2 lane has a red, and the number 3 and 4 lanes have green??
@Falcon2
Now I can see that the green car is lined up with the red light which means he ran the light and moved to one of the through lanes. The road curves to the right here and makes the lights miss align with the cars, But the Green light facing traffic on the left now makes no sense.
4:02 😂
7:08 and 8:21 - Why did you censor the word "idiot"?
RUclips doesn't want the fragile minds of our precious children warped by such filth.
@@thelunchlady8276 LOL!
watching to see if any on my clips made it
@3:30 About 80,800,000 results (0.57 seconds)
Generally, yes, New Jersey law states that you must file a police report after a car accident if the losses are estimated to be $500 or more. The $500 threshold includes both property damages as well as the losses incurred from any injuries.Nov 23, 2021
how much do you factor in lost wages while you're waiting for police to arrive?
And since the air bags went off you know it's more than $500 in damage.
2:35 blacked out car with a person in all black and covering their face comes to block my car and tried to hop out on me. No thank you, you can get ran over ain’t getting shot today
8:12 now i want White Castle
#14 I believe the captions were reversed.
6:00 "What did YOU just hit?" 😣 Sounds like what my wife would say.
no one gonna talk about 13 and how that technically was a hit and run? unless they were buddies or knew each other and settled later.
Didn't know idiot was a bad word.
11 looks like a failed insurance fraud attempt.
@Falcon2 that's why I said failed attempt.. Cut in tight on the turn, didn't get hit, pulled across hoping to blame... Failed attempt...
2:13 that's a really nice road
If you are merging onto a road you do not have right of way can't fix stupidity
Clip 24. Nice job for the driver trying to actually cause an accident by wanting to do a pit maneuver. The cammer should stay off the roads
2:35 Looks like Buffalo NY Can't stand that place during rush hour beautiful city though.
No that’s Manhattan
#1 again
1:06 tbh this doesn’t make sense. Why should you drive slow when the road is empty and no buildings around
3:28: are you sure you didnt stop? Right in the middle of the highway.
Get moving. Havent you learned anything from these videos?
ATTENTION ADMIN: On-screen comments for clip #'s 13 and 14 are reversed. #13 has #14's comments and visa-versa.
6:45- I still don't get why PA has the fascination of using red circular lets for left turns when the surrounding states all use arrows.
Most states I've driven through use a solid red on the left turn signal. Very few use a red arrow. Texas used to use a double solid red on their turn signals to make them more identifiable, although lately I've seen more red arrows in use instead.
@@warrenduree9417
The red arrow can be confusing to some drivers.
Ahhh good ole Hattiesburg Mississippi lol
1:13 A plain lack of sense...and an abundance of headuptheirassery!