Im surprised how many ppl complain about something so simple as volume knobs, the sterring has volume controls and not a big deal. Always had vehicles with sterring controls..
I bought a Santa Cruz Limited. The way the 2.5t and the DCT provide a dynamic driving experience is unmatched by the Ford. The Hyundai is on par with the Audi A4 in terms of how it is tuned. I am so happy I bought my Santa Cruz. Hyundai must have put a lot of hours into it to make it this good!
I hate the volume knob in my wife’s 2021 Corolla. It’s not a “real” knob. There’s a lag/delay when you start the car and spin the knob to turn it down that takes about 4-6 seconds. Sure, mechanically it spins around like a knob but if the system registers the inputs exactly like how it would a touch sensor, what’s the point? There’s no tactility either so you can’t move it up or down precisely *like how you can tap the touch sensor for precise volume control*. They get gross, fade and chip eventually, have more mechanical points of failure… I really don’t get the volume knob fetish at all 😂
I like both, both have pros and cons I would of been happy with either choice. But it was almost impossible to find either at dealers. Until I finally found a Santa Cruz and bought it. I’m happy no regrets
The review keeps harping Santa Cruz is $5-$6k more than Maverick, however you are not comparing trucks withs with similar features. The closest to SC Limited is loaded AWD Lariat. Once you add bed liner, bed covers, sunroof, heated seats the Ford is less than $1-2k below SC but the Ford is still missing Leather seats, ventilated front seats, surround view monitor and rear vents all of which is well worth the price difference. On the lower end, XL Maverick Hybrid below $25k can't be beat if you can find one.
I must have watched ten videos and commenters and creators alike are crying about price but they fail to make an apples to apples trim comparison. Lariat FX4 trim is $39,000 an XRT with hitch is like $41,000. I think people are just showing Ford bias because this guy is saying the SC is $5000 more than the Mav but I'm looking at a Limited priced at $42,000.
Excellent video. Loved the in real time driving side by side comparison. I put in a factory order for the Santa Cruz a few weeks ago (6 month wait) but that's ok. If I were single I'd definitely go for the Maverick. But as a soon to be family man homeowner diy'er the Santa Cruz ticks off more boxes and is more comprehensive. Wife doesn't mind driving to as she's not a traditional truck person just like me Not a fan of its price tag but it's a bit more premium so it's expected.
Could you please justify the rear legroom and a little bit more detail. Everyone seems to say that the Santa Cruz has poor rear seat legroom. However when I look it up the legroom is 6/10 of an inch larger in the Santa Cruz than the Maverick. As a matter of fact there’s not many trucks in this class with more legroom according to specs. The Jeep gladiator which is ugly as hell has a bit more. But according to every Reference I’ve seen this has more than the Colorado, the Maverick and even the Ridgeline
Sorry, it's been some time since I've been in both. It might be that 1. The way the legroom feels in the real world is different than SAE measurements, or 2. The front seatbacks are shaped less comfortably in the Santa Cruz
Great video! I like both vehicles, but all Ford dealers are charging minimum 5k over MSRP. I wanted the Ford, but the cost with their markup has pushed me to the Santa Cruz. I actually got to drive the Hyundai 3 days ago and it was very nice. I've had at least 10 Ford vehicles over the last 50 years and I'm a Ford guy, but I don't see owning another. Now I just need to convince the wife I need a new sports truck.
Last comment… It's funny that in the garage, you guys leaned toward the Maverick. But as soon as you got behind the wheel the Santa Cruz it was like wow this things quick, wow this things plush, wow this things comfortable… oh yeah duh it cost more... And there you have it
Both the Ford and the Hyundai need small cab/long bed options. Especially the Santa Cruz since it's rear seating area is so cramped and practicality useless for the typical American Golden Corral type physique we're globally known for. Why have rear seating that only non adults can fit in paired with a bed that uselessly small? Good review guys. Wish the 4 door/4-5 passenger platform wasn't our only choice on most vehicles. Not everyone has a family or drives with multiple people inside. Can't wait for the Miata 4 door pickup station wagon cargo van suv cross bentover urban underlander.
@@invictusf5790 A truck is a tool, like a shovel or jack hammer. A get the job done vehicle for carrying stuff more so than extra people. Back seats sized for children are great if you have a family and I get that. It's not negative to want a truck to still be a truck. A 4.5' bed is more like a hatchless hatchback or a suv with open air rear storage. Whether you're 6'7" or 4'8", a useful truck bed is still the same as a work vehicle. For carrying stuff. Keep seating for 5 separate from vehicles designed to get stuff done. That being said(typed), if Ford offered a small cab 6' bed Maverick, I'd buy one.
I am 43, I've owned Ford my entire life until 2 years ago. I had a Raptor and a Explorer Sport, in less than 40,000 miles with all services complete we went trough 5 turbos on the Explorer which was the wife's grocery getter. After the 5th turbo Ford said they cant figure out the issue an would no longer honor the warranty after exhausting all channels of communication I was left with "take us to court if you can find a lawyer". I traded the Explorer in for a Hyundai Palisade Calligraphy for the wife and i traded the Raptor for a Ram Power Wagon, I will never purchase another Ford, I was actually planning on getting the Raptor Bronco for me and something nice for the wife from Ford until they went to shit with customer care and honoring warranties. Our Hyundai has the extended bumper to bumper 200,000 mile warranty but nothing goes wrong with the damn thing so it doesn't look like we will be testing it out any time soon, couldn't be happier with it! I served in the Army for 21 years active duty as a combat medic, it was always been American for me but Upon my retirement we were driving back home to Oregon from Fort Hood Texas when the 5th turbo went out, they looked at it kept it for 7 days while my wife, 4 kids and I had to find a hotel to stay in with a rental just for them to say they give up and we were on our own. Its sad to see what our companies have come down to.
Wait to you learn about hyundai/kia engine siezing up on owners. Bottom line no car is perfect or problem free. It's like pick your poison when you buy anything now.
Count me in the less than one percent that can care less if there are any knobs or buttons. It's 2024 and vehicles should be more tech forward, not just EVs. The piano black will get annoying, but soft touch knobless infotainment is fine. Funny. Roman from TLC is taller than 6ft and has no issue in the back seat. Seems like you're slouching or showing bias. The back seat is like 1" roomier than the SC so if you can't fit in the SC you really can't fit in the Mav either.
I had built a maverick lariat with everything I could think of and it came to 38,395 I actually sat in a maverick here in town and was hopeful until I sat in it. Lots of plastic, and just feels like a lower grade vehicle, older tech, then I looked at the santa cruz, premium in town, I liked it very much but the local dealer marked the price up to the price of a limited, I found a limited next state over that actually sold it at msrp.. the price difference was 2,805.00 between the limited and the lariat. I am glad I went for the santa cruz, much more safety features, up to date tech, lots of cameras, plenty of power, good fuel economy, excellent ride quality and an awesome warranty. Plus a more robust suspension vs the maverick, as well as the quality under the hood. I have no problem with no radio knobs, it's not a deal breaker, there's knobs on the steering wheel, plus the looks are more modern, I don't know the looks being aggressive, but it looks more modern that the maverick. That's a personal preference, but overall I'm happy with my santa cruz.
I'm in the same position as you. I have been cross shopping both of these trucks and while the Maverick comes out to around $2500-$3000 cheaper, it shows. I'm going to be putting in an order for a Santa Cruz this weekend.
@@samclark3370 good deal, I have about 1800 miles on mine and I love it. However I had to drive to olive branch Ms to the homer skelton dealer, that was the closest one that sells msrp, the one dealer in my town marks the limited up 7k. The dealer even gives a lifetime engine and transmission warranty 100.00 deductible and doesn't have to be their dealership to get work. I borrowed a friend's truck and rented a uhaul car hauler and towed it back to Mobile.... about 700 miles but worth it. The SC rides great, handles very well, is fast, and all the safety tech and much better build quality and you can't beat the warranty, Ford's warranty sucks, enjoy yours when you get one.
@@samclark3370 BTW the maverick I ordered from long MacArthur ford is still in transit, I ordered it in September. They do free delivery within 1k radius. They are great to deal with, msrp, and will order for you, but I went with my gut, I had to wait for my SC for about 3 weeks. Montgomery is pumping the SC out like crazy, unlike Ford and their Mexico plant, how are you not building them especially with older tech...and quality control issues..if you fins a maverick to sit in you will be disappointed.
@@gregsangilan1929 I called about ordering a Maverick and they gave me a 1-2 year wait timeline. I about laughed and hung up. Ford doesn’t want to sell any vehicles. I was told it would be 4-6 months for a Santa Cruz.
@@samclark3370 nope the two ford dealers in town didn't even want to help me, I told them I had 12k down payment still didn't take me seriously, BTW I have an 2021 hybrid explorer patrol car, died at 19k in my driveway, ford dealer had it for 3 months, first month sat in the parking lot, 2nd month said it was the batteries and don't know when and if it would be ready, 3rd month was computer control module, replaced it then ac panel was dead, had to get engineers at ford to write a program that took 2 more weeks, dealer said it was the only explorer in the nation with that problem, nice being a ginuea pig, that right there was the reason I went with the SC, ford still hasn't gotten their hybrid system down pat. Explorer runs now but shifts from electric to gas like crap. Don't go hybrid and steer away from ford service. They suck, at least our dealerships.Ford"built ford rough"🤣
Calling the Perelli Scorpions on the Maverick FX4 an all-terrain tire is a real stretch. They're just an ok set of all-seasons. They do have an $800 option for a different set of wheels that come with Falken Wildpeaks. If you planned on swapping to a more aggressive tire, the package is worth the cost
Honestly, you can buy the falken wildpeaks for about $800, and then you have an extra set of tires. I don't see the value in getting it from the factory that way.
@@macsterguy I'm just saying its not a "no brainer", because even Hyundai says not to oil it, as the oil will eventually attract dirt and clog it. You're supposed to use paraffin wax.
I definitely like both and thank you for the great review and info. I originally had my heart set on the Maverick but impossible to find so started looking at the Santa Cruz and am very impressed with what I am seeing. I have had Nissan Frontiers for years and was also waiting for the new design and they are sharp, but when I test drove one it felt like they made the hood so big and it made the truck feel huge which I didn't want. Overall I think the styling, features and especially the warranty is helping me to decide on the Santa Cruz. Thanks guys.
2 questions I've not seen addressed by anyone...1. how high is the step in, from the ground, for each vehicle. I'm an older woman, 5 ft 7 in, and my leg doesn't lift like it did when I had my Jeep...lol 2. Which vehicle has the most room for driver and front passenger? Are they both the same width or is one wider than the other?
Yes you can, there are three 10mm bolts on each side, then slide the tonneau cover off. It's easier to slide off in a fully extended state. You can also remove the rail which has three more 10mm bolts in the back of the bed. You can replace it with a soft cover.
Your assessment is pretty spot on… my nephew and I who are almost the same age bought new trucks.... he bought the Santa Cruz, I bought the Maverick. I live in a semi rural area, he lives in a suburban area and takes long road trips , I do not
People can choose either one based on their capabilities, features, aesthetics, pricing, etc. Why argue about which is "best" when it's subjective to each person based on what they want? Let's all just be glad that a small truck category is making a comeback! 😁
They both look great, I ordered the maverick which I’m impatiently waiting for. It’s great for the money, function and economy is key for me in this vehicle. Thanks for the review
The dct on the hyundai is stupid not only that it is so expensive to buy you would rather buy a tacoma or its competitors. Maverick on the other hand got it right with a proper slush box although it has a cvt too as an option it is only because it is paired with a hybrid engine which makes it alot more practical than sedans.
Correction, no Maverick gets sync 3 except for the fully loaded Lariat Luxury Package. All other trims, including non-luxury Lariats don't even get Sync 3.
So the Santa Cruz starts off at $23,000 not $26,000 in which even the lowest model feels more premium than the highest model of the maverick. I bought the Santa Cruz Sel premium. And of course not only is the Santa Cruz more premium it backs it up with warrantees
Either of these woulda been so handy when I SAE Baja in college. We’d usually just haul Baja parts around in this beater Subaru Sambar that got passed from team captain to team captain, but either of these woulda been wayyyyyyyy more useful (and reliable). Also, I know Chris has the 323i, but what’s that E46 wagon doin there?👀
Wow you think smooth car like rounded corners are "premium" and hard rectangular truck styling is not "premium" and they wouldn't be caught dead in a real truck that has some minorly distasteful wheel spacers and wide tires.
Macsterguy must be a Hyundai salesman. Go ahead and spend 10k more on a SC and get 1/2 mpg city, no hitch receiver or brake controller, or go off road and start smelling the burning dual clutch tranny. It's a truck if I want piano black I will take my Mercedes.
The SC has: *No hybrid *Small back seat room *Less rear window glass *No knobs *Composite bed (not a spray in liner) vs Mav steel *Only 3 ft of bed when the tonneau is open *Dual clutch trans, TFL had to stop off roading after less than 1 minute because they could smell the DCT burning up. *No factory brake controller to tow 5k. Injury attorneys will probably say this is a defect and make millions when they chase the ambulances that have to scrape people off the road.
The SC is: • Faster • Higher carrying capacity • Self leveling shocks • Autonomous driving - next level • Much better infotainment • Much more comfortable ride • Quieter I drove both of these vehicles and there is no comparison that's why I bought the Santa Cruz Limited it cost more but has so much more Content and refinement. The Mav's interior looks like the interior of a porta potty... sorry
My Ridgeline's composite bed is still rust free after being outside for 16 years. Show me a SportTrac with a steel bed that is rust free after 16 years.
I still think it's weird these two vehicles are even compared. Their goals are not the same and the completely different price points make that clear. You spend more, you should expect more.
@@Ichibuns I agree. But one of the reasons to get a truck is for occasional towing and hauling of more than just people, otherwise you might as well buy a $40k car. If you spend more on a SC you should be able to get a hybrid or at least a factory installed hitch receiver, trailer wiring and a brake controller so you can safely tow a 5000 lb boat or RV like the Hyundai execs brag about.
You should never off-road a a turbo Santa Cruz, only the N/A. TFL complained about the powerband of the Santa Cruz & Ridgeline on their tow test, because they didn't put the vehicles in sport mode. I thought this is common knowledge among those who tow a lot. As for the Maverick, the poor thing almost overheated from the tow test. TFL didn't sanitized the Maverick video enough. I already know they're on Ford's shyt list.
The Hyundai Santa Cruz SE for example has a 2.5l naturally aspirated motor and yet can still tow 3,500 lbs and that's 1500 more than the Maverick yet you don't even need a Turbo motor to do that. Maverick on the other hand you have to pay for the tow package just to get the extra towing when Hyundai automatically comes with it. Yes the Hyundai has more standard features such as cruise control, the Maverick is more on the cheap side even with the Lariat yet Hyundai has better materials even on the base trim level. The 2.0 Turbo on the Maverick doesn't even feel like it has 250hp it feels less. Hyundai has a better warranty and it's more reliable too but it depends on your preference I guess.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Hyundai_transmissions#A8F42/A8LF2 Hyundai's 8 speed auto for fwd based powertrains doesn't have a sufficient torque rating for that 2.5t engine (and kinda outdated) They've also canceled 10 speed auto so higher engine trim Hyundais which output more than 420nm are gonna get the 8 speed wet dct since there's no other way around atm🤷
I have the non turbo and you are right, it has very little torque, it really relies on the transmission to find any power, I thought a 2.5 would have more torque than it does, it's okay but just barely. Also, if you're in sport mode, it holds gears waaaay too long, if you're on a tight twisty road, it's okay but on more open roads, it just revs to the moon despite how much throttle is applied, AND, when in smart mode, if you gas it to get in front of a car or whenever you need a quick burst of acceleration, it thinks you need sport mode and carries the revs waaay too long, it's like you have to completely let off the gas and let it settle down before you can get going again. I think in the end, like you say, the motor just doesn't produce enough torque. I've pretty much learned how to drive it to it's best potential, shouldn't have to since it's an auto but now that I know what not to do, it's a good driving car and mine being front wheel drive only, it handles pretty darn good and I'm coming from a Veloster N.
Im surprised how many ppl complain about something so simple as volume knobs, the sterring has volume controls and not a big deal. Always had vehicles with sterring controls..
Great comparison video! If the Santa Cruz ever gets a hybrid I'm buying!
I bought a Santa Cruz Limited. The way the 2.5t and the DCT provide a dynamic driving experience is unmatched by the Ford. The Hyundai is on par with the Audi A4 in terms of how it is tuned. I am so happy I bought my Santa Cruz. Hyundai must have put a lot of hours into it to make it this good!
I know one thing the Maverick has the Santa Cruz doesn't.. A dedicated subreddit..
I hate the volume knob in my wife’s 2021 Corolla. It’s not a “real” knob. There’s a lag/delay when you start the car and spin the knob to turn it down that takes about 4-6 seconds.
Sure, mechanically it spins around like a knob but if the system registers the inputs exactly like how it would a touch sensor, what’s the point? There’s no tactility either so you can’t move it up or down precisely *like how you can tap the touch sensor for precise volume control*.
They get gross, fade and chip eventually, have more mechanical points of failure…
I really don’t get the volume knob fetish at all 😂
I have the 23 Santa Cruz SEL. It has a volume knob and soft seat backs not hard plastic. I also don't have the bed cover so I can use my entire bed.
Sounds like the one to get!
@@DailyMotor I'm pleased with it
I like both, both have pros and cons I would of been happy with either choice. But it was almost impossible to find either at dealers. Until I finally found a Santa Cruz and bought it. I’m happy no regrets
FWIW, the three lower trims in the Santa Cruz, the SE, the SEL and the SEL Premium all have a volume knob.
Not quite, they have a volume roller.
@@BoopSnoot That's a knob on its side.
knobs for the climate control too
The wife totaled my Corolla yesterday. I stood looking at the wreckage in the middle of the road thinking, “Cactus gray…the Hybrid”.
Sales Figures for 2022
Maverick 74K Units
Santa Cruz 36K Units
Maverick outsells Santa Cruz and has a 67% vs 33% market share
The review keeps harping Santa Cruz is $5-$6k more than Maverick, however you are not comparing trucks withs with similar features. The closest to SC Limited is loaded AWD Lariat. Once you add bed liner, bed covers, sunroof, heated seats the Ford is less than $1-2k below SC but the Ford is still missing Leather seats, ventilated front seats, surround view monitor and rear vents all of which is well worth the price difference. On the lower end, XL Maverick Hybrid below $25k can't be beat if you can find one.
I must have watched ten videos and commenters and creators alike are crying about price but they fail to make an apples to apples trim comparison. Lariat FX4 trim is $39,000 an XRT with hitch is like $41,000. I think people are just showing Ford bias because this guy is saying the SC is $5000 more than the Mav but I'm looking at a Limited priced at $42,000.
@@invictusf5790 With incentives, '24 SC Limited is $39k which a better value than a Lariat AWD.
I'd prefer the Santa Cruz from looks and performance but... the Maverick for being more utilitarian and the price just can't be beat.
Excellent video. Loved the in real time driving side by side comparison.
I put in a factory order for the Santa Cruz a few weeks ago (6 month wait) but that's ok.
If I were single I'd definitely go for the Maverick. But as a soon to be family man homeowner diy'er the Santa Cruz ticks off more boxes and is more comprehensive. Wife doesn't mind driving to as she's not a traditional truck person just like me Not a fan of its price tag but it's a bit more premium so it's expected.
Is the difference in 10.25" screen vs 8" enough to influence your decisions?
Could you please justify the rear legroom and a little bit more detail. Everyone seems to say that the Santa Cruz has poor rear seat legroom. However when I look it up the legroom is 6/10 of an inch larger in the Santa Cruz than the Maverick. As a matter of fact there’s not many trucks in this class with more legroom according to specs. The Jeep gladiator which is ugly as hell has a bit more. But according to every Reference I’ve seen this has more than the Colorado, the Maverick and even the Ridgeline
Sorry, it's been some time since I've been in both. It might be that 1. The way the legroom feels in the real world is different than SAE measurements, or 2. The front seatbacks are shaped less comfortably in the Santa Cruz
The ford is cool, looks a bit old and dated , no frills which is fine for what it is. I’d buy a ranger before I purchased a maverick.
Great video! I like both vehicles, but all Ford dealers are charging minimum 5k over MSRP. I wanted the Ford, but the cost with their markup has pushed me to the Santa Cruz. I actually got to drive the Hyundai 3 days ago and it was very nice. I've had at least 10 Ford vehicles over the last 50 years and I'm a Ford guy, but I don't see owning another. Now I just need to convince the wife I need a new sports truck.
Last comment… It's funny that in the garage, you guys leaned toward the Maverick. But as soon as you got behind the wheel the Santa Cruz it was like wow this things quick, wow this things plush, wow this things comfortable… oh yeah duh it cost more... And there you have it
Both the Ford and the Hyundai need small cab/long bed options. Especially the Santa Cruz since it's rear seating area is so cramped and practicality useless for the typical American Golden Corral type physique we're globally known for. Why have rear seating that only non adults can fit in paired with a bed that uselessly small? Good review guys. Wish the 4 door/4-5 passenger platform wasn't our only choice on most vehicles. Not everyone has a family or drives with multiple people inside. Can't wait for the Miata 4 door pickup station wagon cargo van suv cross bentover urban underlander.
How tall are you, 6'7? The back fits 6'2" and under without issue. You guys love to exaggerate for the sake of being negative.
@@invictusf5790 A truck is a tool, like a shovel or jack hammer. A get the job done vehicle for carrying stuff more so than extra people. Back seats sized for children are great if you have a family and I get that. It's not negative to want a truck to still be a truck. A 4.5' bed is more like a hatchless hatchback or a suv with open air rear storage. Whether you're 6'7" or 4'8", a useful truck bed is still the same as a work vehicle. For carrying stuff. Keep seating for 5 separate from vehicles designed to get stuff done. That being said(typed), if Ford offered a small cab 6' bed Maverick, I'd buy one.
I am 43, I've owned Ford my entire life until 2 years ago. I had a Raptor and a Explorer Sport, in less than 40,000 miles with all services complete we went trough 5 turbos on the Explorer which was the wife's grocery getter. After the 5th turbo Ford said they cant figure out the issue an would no longer honor the warranty after exhausting all channels of communication I was left with "take us to court if you can find a lawyer". I traded the Explorer in for a Hyundai Palisade Calligraphy for the wife and i traded the Raptor for a Ram Power Wagon, I will never purchase another Ford, I was actually planning on getting the Raptor Bronco for me and something nice for the wife from Ford until they went to shit with customer care and honoring warranties. Our Hyundai has the extended bumper to bumper 200,000 mile warranty but nothing goes wrong with the damn thing so it doesn't look like we will be testing it out any time soon, couldn't be happier with it! I served in the Army for 21 years active duty as a combat medic, it was always been American for me but Upon my retirement we were driving back home to Oregon from Fort Hood Texas when the 5th turbo went out, they looked at it kept it for 7 days while my wife, 4 kids and I had to find a hotel to stay in with a rental just for them to say they give up and we were on our own. Its sad to see what our companies have come down to.
Oof, 5 turbos, that's rough. I hate to say it, but that is definitely a reason to avoid American brands.
Wait to you learn about hyundai/kia engine siezing up on owners. Bottom line no car is perfect or problem free. It's like pick your poison when you buy anything now.
driven both gonna get the santa cruz its over all better
Count me in the less than one percent that can care less if there are any knobs or buttons. It's 2024 and vehicles should be more tech forward, not just EVs. The piano black will get annoying, but soft touch knobless infotainment is fine. Funny. Roman from TLC is taller than 6ft and has no issue in the back seat. Seems like you're slouching or showing bias. The back seat is like 1" roomier than the SC so if you can't fit in the SC you really can't fit in the Mav either.
I had built a maverick lariat with everything I could think of and it came to 38,395 I actually sat in a maverick here in town and was hopeful until I sat in it. Lots of plastic, and just feels like a lower grade vehicle, older tech, then I looked at the santa cruz, premium in town, I liked it very much but the local dealer marked the price up to the price of a limited, I found a limited next state over that actually sold it at msrp.. the price difference was 2,805.00 between the limited and the lariat. I am glad I went for the santa cruz, much more safety features, up to date tech, lots of cameras, plenty of power, good fuel economy, excellent ride quality and an awesome warranty. Plus a more robust suspension vs the maverick, as well as the quality under the hood. I have no problem with no radio knobs, it's not a deal breaker, there's knobs on the steering wheel, plus the looks are more modern, I don't know the looks being aggressive, but it looks more modern that the maverick. That's a personal preference, but overall I'm happy with my santa cruz.
I'm in the same position as you. I have been cross shopping both of these trucks and while the Maverick comes out to around $2500-$3000 cheaper, it shows. I'm going to be putting in an order for a Santa Cruz this weekend.
@@samclark3370 good deal, I have about 1800 miles on mine and I love it. However I had to drive to olive branch Ms to the homer skelton dealer, that was the closest one that sells msrp, the one dealer in my town marks the limited up 7k. The dealer even gives a lifetime engine and transmission warranty 100.00 deductible and doesn't have to be their dealership to get work. I borrowed a friend's truck and rented a uhaul car hauler and towed it back to Mobile.... about 700 miles but worth it. The SC rides great, handles very well, is fast, and all the safety tech and much better build quality and you can't beat the warranty, Ford's warranty sucks, enjoy yours when you get one.
@@samclark3370 BTW the maverick I ordered from long MacArthur ford is still in transit, I ordered it in September. They do free delivery within 1k radius. They are great to deal with, msrp, and will order for you, but I went with my gut, I had to wait for my SC for about 3 weeks. Montgomery is pumping the SC out like crazy, unlike Ford and their Mexico plant, how are you not building them especially with older tech...and quality control issues..if you fins a maverick to sit in you will be disappointed.
@@gregsangilan1929 I called about ordering a Maverick and they gave me a 1-2 year wait timeline. I about laughed and hung up. Ford doesn’t want to sell any vehicles. I was told it would be 4-6 months for a Santa Cruz.
@@samclark3370 nope the two ford dealers in town didn't even want to help me, I told them I had 12k down payment still didn't take me seriously, BTW I have an 2021 hybrid explorer patrol car, died at 19k in my driveway, ford dealer had it for 3 months, first month sat in the parking lot, 2nd month said it was the batteries and don't know when and if it would be ready, 3rd month was computer control module, replaced it then ac panel was dead, had to get engineers at ford to write a program that took 2 more weeks, dealer said it was the only explorer in the nation with that problem, nice being a ginuea pig, that right there was the reason I went with the SC, ford still hasn't gotten their hybrid system down pat. Explorer runs now but shifts from electric to gas like crap. Don't go hybrid and steer away from ford service. They suck, at least our dealerships.Ford"built ford rough"🤣
Do you need to run premium fuel in either of the turbo engines?
No as far as i kniw
No, you can use 87 octane (reg unleaded) per the owners manual.
With my extended warranty and lifetime oul changes my lariat lux with fx4 and tow cost as much as that Santa Cruz... I made a good choice i think
Calling the Perelli Scorpions on the Maverick FX4 an all-terrain tire is a real stretch. They're just an ok set of all-seasons. They do have an $800 option for a different set of wheels that come with Falken Wildpeaks. If you planned on swapping to a more aggressive tire, the package is worth the cost
Honestly, you can buy the falken wildpeaks for about $800, and then you have an extra set of tires. I don't see the value in getting it from the factory that way.
@@chrisbunn2747 That's true. I suppose it'll depend if you like the wheels the Falken's come with
Ford should have just outfitted the FX4 package with Falken AT tires.
a couple shots of spray oil makes the SC cover work like butter. Cmon guys...
Hyundai user manual specifically says not to lubricate the rails though.
@@BoopSnoot Mine was too hard to move in early August. The oil I use is perfect for this job and it’s been like butter ever since now in February so…
@@macsterguy I'm just saying its not a "no brainer", because even Hyundai says not to oil it, as the oil will eventually attract dirt and clog it. You're supposed to use paraffin wax.
@@BoopSnoot Good to know. Do you have a Cruz? I’m a clean freak and it’s garage kept. No dirt in my rails 👍🏼😊
I definitely like both and thank you for the great review and info. I originally had my heart set on the Maverick but impossible to find so started looking at the Santa Cruz and am very impressed with what I am seeing. I have had Nissan Frontiers for years and was also waiting for the new design and they are sharp, but when I test drove one it felt like they made the hood so big and it made the truck feel huge which I didn't want. Overall I think the styling, features and especially the warranty is helping me to decide on the Santa Cruz. Thanks guys.
To me. The Santa Cruz looks like a updated El Camino.
You say it like that’s a bad thing.
2 questions I've not seen addressed by anyone...1. how high is the step in, from the ground, for each vehicle. I'm an older woman, 5 ft 7 in, and my leg doesn't lift like it did when I had my Jeep...lol 2. Which vehicle has the most room for driver and front passenger? Are they both the same width or is one wider than the other?
Bed on SC no good for dirtbike and electric bikes with that bed cover blocking it. Can you take the bed cover off?
Yes you can, there are three 10mm bolts on each side, then slide the tonneau cover off. It's easier to slide off in a fully extended state. You can also remove the rail which has three more 10mm bolts in the back of the bed. You can replace it with a soft cover.
Your assessment is pretty spot on… my nephew and I who are almost the same age bought new trucks.... he bought the Santa Cruz, I bought the Maverick. I live in a semi rural area, he lives in a suburban area and takes long road trips , I do not
People can choose either one based on their capabilities, features, aesthetics, pricing, etc. Why argue about which is "best" when it's subjective to each person based on what they want? Let's all just be glad that a small truck category is making a comeback! 😁
Fun fact due to the slippery mode during the race you guys did you limited the throttle acceleration in the maverick. I may have been closer!
Wow, how does that one guy see with his GoPro pulled down over his eyes? What an awkward video lol. Nice seeing them compared but wow......
They both look great, I ordered the maverick which I’m impatiently waiting for. It’s great for the money, function and economy is key for me in this vehicle. Thanks for the review
How long is your wait time?
@@samclark3370 Ordered in mid Jan and build week is supposed to be March 28th. We’ll see how it goes.
The dct on the hyundai is stupid not only that it is so expensive to buy you would rather buy a tacoma or its competitors. Maverick on the other hand got it right with a proper slush box although it has a cvt too as an option it is only because it is paired with a hybrid engine which makes it alot more practical than sedans.
Correction, the lariat Maverick does not get sync 4 for 2022 - all trims are sync 3
Correction, no Maverick gets sync 3 except for the fully loaded Lariat Luxury Package. All other trims, including non-luxury Lariats don't even get Sync 3.
Santa Cruz !!!!!!!!
Which one has the better warranty?
Sandy Munro is the only person I have heard complain about having a manual control knob. I think he likes piano black too.😁
I had a 2013 ford focus and that thing would jerk so ugly when in stop and go traffic.
So the Santa Cruz starts off at $23,000 not $26,000 in which even the lowest model feels more premium than the highest model of the maverick. I bought the Santa Cruz Sel premium. And of course not only is the Santa Cruz more premium it backs it up with warrantees
Either of these woulda been so handy when I SAE Baja in college. We’d usually just haul Baja parts around in this beater Subaru Sambar that got passed from team captain to team captain, but either of these woulda been wayyyyyyyy more useful (and reliable). Also, I know Chris has the 323i, but what’s that E46 wagon doin there?👀
I would love to see the maverick hybrid on the dyno
Wow you think smooth car like rounded corners are "premium" and hard rectangular truck styling is not "premium" and they wouldn't be caught dead in a real truck that has some minorly distasteful wheel spacers and wide tires.
Mav
Macsterguy must be a Hyundai salesman. Go ahead and spend 10k more on a SC and get 1/2 mpg city, no hitch receiver or brake controller, or go off road and start smelling the burning dual clutch tranny.
It's a truck if I want piano black I will take my Mercedes.
I ordered one of each. Problem solved!
My dad called engines like the Maverick, "spaghetti bowl" engines. So many hoses and wires going everywhere.
The SC has:
*No hybrid
*Small back seat room
*Less rear window glass
*No knobs
*Composite bed (not a spray in liner) vs Mav steel
*Only 3 ft of bed when the tonneau is open
*Dual clutch trans, TFL had to stop off roading after less than 1 minute because they could smell the DCT burning up.
*No factory brake controller to tow 5k. Injury attorneys will probably say this is a defect and make millions when they chase the ambulances that have to scrape people off the road.
The SC is:
• Faster
• Higher carrying capacity
• Self leveling shocks
• Autonomous driving - next level
• Much better infotainment
• Much more comfortable ride
• Quieter
I drove both of these vehicles and there is no comparison that's why I bought the Santa Cruz Limited it cost more but has so much more Content and refinement. The Mav's interior looks like the interior of a porta potty... sorry
My Ridgeline's composite bed is still rust free after being outside for 16 years. Show me a SportTrac with a steel bed that is rust free after 16 years.
I still think it's weird these two vehicles are even compared. Their goals are not the same and the completely different price points make that clear. You spend more, you should expect more.
@@Ichibuns I agree. But one of the reasons to get a truck is for occasional towing and hauling of more than just people, otherwise you might as well buy a $40k car. If you spend more on a SC you should be able to get a hybrid or at least a factory installed hitch receiver, trailer wiring and a brake controller so you can safely tow a 5000 lb boat or RV like the Hyundai execs brag about.
You should never off-road a a turbo Santa Cruz, only the N/A. TFL complained about the powerband of the Santa Cruz & Ridgeline on their tow test, because they didn't put the vehicles in sport mode. I thought this is common knowledge among those who tow a lot. As for the Maverick, the poor thing almost overheated from the tow test. TFL didn't sanitized the Maverick video enough. I already know they're on Ford's shyt list.
The Hyundai Santa Cruz SE for example has a 2.5l naturally aspirated motor and yet can still tow 3,500 lbs and that's 1500 more than the Maverick yet you don't even need a Turbo motor to do that. Maverick on the other hand you have to pay for the tow package just to get the extra towing when Hyundai automatically comes with it. Yes the Hyundai has more standard features such as cruise control, the Maverick is more on the cheap side even with the Lariat yet Hyundai has better materials even on the base trim level. The 2.0 Turbo on the Maverick doesn't even feel like it has 250hp it feels less. Hyundai has a better warranty and it's more reliable too but it depends on your preference I guess.
Santa is a joke in front of the mighty Mav.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Hyundai_transmissions#A8F42/A8LF2
Hyundai's 8 speed auto for fwd based powertrains doesn't have a sufficient torque rating for that 2.5t engine (and kinda outdated)
They've also canceled 10 speed auto so higher engine trim Hyundais which output more than 420nm are gonna get the 8 speed wet dct
since there's no other way around atm🤷
I have the non turbo and you are right, it has very little torque, it really relies on the transmission to find any power, I thought a 2.5 would have more torque than it does, it's okay but just barely. Also, if you're in sport mode, it holds gears waaaay too long, if you're on a tight twisty road, it's okay but on more open roads, it just revs to the moon despite how much throttle is applied, AND, when in smart mode, if you gas it to get in front of a car or whenever you need a quick burst of acceleration, it thinks you need sport mode and carries the revs waaay too long, it's like you have to completely let off the gas and let it settle down before you can get going again. I think in the end, like you say, the motor just doesn't produce enough torque. I've pretty much learned how to drive it to it's best potential, shouldn't have to since it's an auto but now that I know what not to do, it's a good driving car and mine being front wheel drive only, it handles pretty darn good and I'm coming from a Veloster N.
Is the difference in 10.25" screen vs 8" enough to influence your decisions?