As a Software Engineer with 20+ years in the industry, working in both startups and big tech, I would love to see the face of one of these non-technical AI extremists when they realize programming is just a small part of building, operating and maintaining a successful software product (and it's usually the easiest part).
What do you think is the number one job OpenAI would benefit from automating? What skill can AI acquire that gives OpenAI an advantage over its competitors? What one skill would give OpenAI’s competitors an advantage over them? What type of expertise do you think is most abundant within OpenAI as a resource to fine tune what they are creating? When a new model comes out, what is the first thing they benchmark it on? What real world thing/tool is an AI best positioned to replace?
@@Mateobjs_ Yes. You are more than a programmer. You are a problem solver. Building and maintaining software will continue to change and become higher level. We were using punch cards in the 70s, then came higher level languages, now we have AI assistants to greatly improve productivity (which I think is a good thing), and it will be different in 10 years from now.
@@Mateobjs_ Yes. You are more than a programmer. You are a problem solver. Building and maintaining software will continue changing to become higher level and you have to adapt. We were using punch cards in the 70s, then came higher level languages like C, now we have AI assistants to boost productivity (which I think is a good thing), and it will be different in 10 years from now.
o3 outperforms programmers, which is something much more difficult to do at a high level than creating videos like this one. while this is true that software engineers should be taking action regarding their careers, I would be much more worried if I was someone doing RUclips videos.
Until it can read my entire codebase, analyze it, make it run more efficiently, fully compile it, and, if it fails to compile, search the code for errors, fix them, and get it to run, it's still a few years away.
Thats sound like a monolithic application . Like trying to use ink pen in space Not going to happen nor anyone have time to do it. Simple use pencil in space or microservices for same service
@@christophercarson3675in a highly theoretical case where it's only trained on specific test questions it can. That doesn't change the fact it's only infrastructure most of the tech sector can't afford nor would they have the expertise to implement in house training data without hiring a dedicated team to engineer solutions for a specific use case. It isn't as simple as just turn on and go
@@micahwilliams1826 no , they're tests that humans can do very easily , but that AI cannot . it's also the reason why o3 is not AGI, there are tests you can easily understand, yet o3 struggles. You can submit your own tests to ARC , I think they have a github for this
As a developer with some experience, I work closely with a senior and near-senior developer, focusing more on planning and some coding in the private sector. Satya Nadella put it best: don’t worry about programming disappearing-worry about software as a whole becoming obsolete. At its core, software is just a UI for a database with business logic. With Moore’s Law driving hardware efficiency and AI advancing rapidly, traditional software is evolving into AI agents and LLMs, eliminating the need for apps or typing into interfaces. Businesses, however, often resist change due to inertia-a phenomenon akin to the "frog in boiling water" analogy, where gradual changes go unnoticed until it's too late. This shift will redefine many professions, including programming, but it also opens up opportunities for those who adapt to new technologies and embrace AI-driven innovation.
Factory automation moved slower than was possible because there were sunk costs in existing factories and equipment and new equipment was only added as old equipment and processes started to need replacement. I don’t see that being a factor with AI since it allows a business to reduce facility size, close offices, and decrease head count.
@@hendrx well, another ignorant one that will cry in a year or two... edit: Also, o1 was revealed a couple of months ago, and they skipped o2 entirely. We will have o6 or o7 before the end of 2025 at this pace, and it will definitely be better than every human developer.
When Orion releases next year by December 2025 and the cost to operate O3 falls below $1,000, things are going to get weird. The $1,000 price tag won't last for a year. OpenAI or some other company is going to bring the cost of an O3 model down to O1 prices.
Conservative estimate: O3 outperforms 99.99942% of developers worldwide (upper limit: 99.99965%)! Incredible performance, but definitely comes with a hefty price tag.
You REALLY aren't tuned into what's going. I build AI automations for clients...real life use cases. This will translate and AMPLIFY everything. Sure if your job is eating cheeseburgers all day, you wont be affected. But for those of us gainfully employed, this will be big.
@@mrd6869 i make real life software and no mather what benchmark AI is breaking, it still generate worse code than any junior that i know. And now it costs 3000$ for one tasks for o3, it's more than the lowest salary for a MONTH at my company
@@aziz9488Construction work? When just thirty to forty percent of cognitive workers are unemployed, how much construction work do you think there will be? The economy won’t be booming, that’s for certain. When that many people lose their jobs, we’re talking millions of people globally defaulting on mortgages, credit cards, car loans, etc. leading to a banking crisis, massive drops in tax revenue , a consumption collapse, rise in crime, and so on. Whatever construction jobs exist, there will be a rush of hopeful workers competing for those jobs.
the thing is... when errors arise, who will be to blame? i think companies need someone to blame for errors, first and foremost, and it's not possible to blame a machine that doesn't care. that is, if users even care about the quality of the software they use. the direction seems to be software becomes increasingly buggy and bloated, no one to blame because it passes test, user doesn't care and will just refresh the page. be the change you wanna see, don't use bugged paid software, and go the extra mile to ensure quality in the software you produce
The "low" cost version of it is 20$ per query, which should in fact make it very viable for a lot of tasks. Yes, it scores lower on reasoning, but if it can do a day's worth of coding in more down-to-earth use cases for 20$... it's an absolute bargain. However, it would also depend on the max input tokens value. If it's too low, it might still be less useful for real projects than simpler models like Gemini which have this aspect covered better (1m+ input). Also, let's not forget that they hardly had time to optimize it. It could be significantly cheaper by the time of release.
It's because once they say they have achieved AGI they get a huge chunk of money as part of a milestone payment that is defined in one of their contracts with Microsoft
OpenAI has specifically said they are on the path to AGI, which is not controversial. All frontier labs are on this path… whether it’s a 2 year path or a 20 year path. But OpenAI did not call o3 AGI. Many OpenAI fans and sensationalist content creators commenting on o3 are calling it that, but OpenAI is not.
AI could never *design* systems, it can only code. Learning just coding was not enough either way. That’s why bootcamps and self-learning have low success ratio. What will change in the near future? Monkey programmers will become obsolete. Developers and software engineers that participate actively in designing the software architecture have no fear. Instead of whining about AI taking your job, upgrade yourselves from a programming monkey to a designer.
@@meme_Overflow I don't believe it's such a low percentage. But I don't necessarily believe it's a bad thing. As Excel rose the number of accountants, AI could rose the number of software engineers. The job market, yes, it's changing and we must conform to it, but skillfulness is NEVER wasted.
If I interview a person, I have a few leetcode questions i know well that I would ask the candidate to solve. This is to get an idea of how the person thinks and how they work. It is a small qualifier of what they can do and how they work. If I were to evaluate an AI, it would be way more constrained. I would have it solve a large problem, like give a set of files, parse them and create a database model, and classify the data for me with specified categories. Then i want it to ask me about requirements, like a human would have to. Otherwise, it will all come down to me to do all the useful work.
Programming as a career becomes more select. You can stay in denial but keep in mind this is the worse it will ever be! Microsoft CEO was right when he said that AI will replace the application layer to interact with data.
But even with all of those improvements, companies value their privacy and data more than anything, so from my perspective it’s difficult to think that AI will replace programmers if the cost of creating software by an AI is sharing all of the data with another company. What do you all think?
Occupations change, come and go. What the work consists of changes. Before refrigerators there were iceboxes, cabinets cooled by ice. At that time there was a market for ice delivery. That market is gone now. What developers do has changed some during the 40 years I have been working with computers. The web didn't exist in 1980. Programming languages that were common back then are not so common today; instead new languages have come. Developer environments have improved a lot. The developer job will continue to change. AI will help developers even more than today. The role of the developers might change to be more about prompt engineering. But for quite a while, I think, classical developers will still be needed, especially for those parts that AI's don't know very well.
Who tf cares about the near & medium timeframe? Do you even realize what you are lowkey admitting ? Secondly, how smart would you have to be, to outcompete the other applicants, to finally become that sole-employee who would work at the company? I will leave this here: Actually, Horses are still for hire for transportation even in the most industrialized cities. It's just that nobody in the right senses will do so. They are hire for show-off these days. That's their new purpose.
I love how people keep jumping on this AI replacing programmers thing. I use AI every day and I can tell you AI cannot code worth ship. Sure it can do basic coding but it cannot create a simple POJO that performs a complex function. It also cannot, in any shape or form, create code from pseudocode. I have tried a ton of different models and nothing. In fact the only way AI has worked for me is to assist in creating very basic code, and if supervised closely it can create some test code but I have little faith in that as well. I lost an entire day of coding because the previous programmer used AI to do 80% code completion and the code was so borked that the AI created test code only worked with the exact SAME input every single time. If you altered the input to the test code at all for the different values that can be absorbed by the code it failed. So when someone says AI can code better than a programmer... well that is just not true, it cannot take in complex prompts to create an application, no matter how detailed the prompt. It also cannot create code to log into certain access points, not wifi here but servers and DB's, it simply doesn't understand it. I even gave a local AI model my code that works 100% and it could not create a simple login to a DB to create a DB query that worked. I had to go in and tell it exactly what was wrong and after it fixed the code it broke other code. So no, again, AI cannot, at all, in any way fashion or form create complex, code and therefor it cannot replace programmers.
I wouldn't sound so absolute. AI is currently in its infancy. ChatGPT came out in 2022 and couldn't code at all. It's now 2024/2025... and there are claims that the unreleased model can code better than 99% of coders. Though that yet to be seen... if the claims are true, what level do you think it will be at a few years from now? Of course, no one wants AI to put humans out of work, but don't be so naive....
no, economy fucked the career in the first place, nobody that actually knows shit about llm says they are replacing softwares engineers, it's probably the end of frontends taking one week to turn a button from red to blue tho
At this point, nobody cares anymore. Life goes on. We've been seeing this benchmarks for the last couple of years. Juniors are still being hired in droves, there's still devs in demand, etc. Go face your code. In the end, it's just another toolbox 🤷
and it will be like that, as senior will always be retiring and without any juniors you will left chatgpt copy itself with no innovation. But still, interesting times as this is something that those re***ds from high management will never understand, they are not technical and they dont care.
Well, that's because the previous releases we're all hype that didn't meet anyone's expectations. But having an AI that can code better than 99% of humans on the planet is a different story. Will it happen next month? Nah... But if it's at this level now, where will it be in five years? It'll be at a level we can't comprehend.
eh I think it'll just make coders more productive, thus increasing their marginal revenue product, and making them more valuable. The ability to google stack overflow, and really good IDEs was a slightly bigger change but this is still a big deal.
Hi! what is interesting in 3 points that you have mentioned at the end - this is more or less senior level - but seniors not appearing from nothing - they are juniors gone through all the stages. but if ai will overtake jun/middle layer? I also watched your video about 174 law. And i have an idea that all this is interconnected, i.e. with this law they forcing everybody to hair "virtual developers" - as a sequence to increase dependence from AI hardware/software to pay off this 1 trillion investments that big techs already made to not loose their money.
Can't wait for the new administration to cut all social programs and "get people back to work" as AI takes more and more jobs. Good times ahead. By the end of these four years unemployment will increase dramatically
You know I like your analogy of a farmer 200 years ago , but the thing is now it's not only about farming or coding , it's called AGI , so AI could replace anything technically...
People think its only going to go so far and then stop. Its not, its going to end up being star trek level good where you just give it a prompt and it generates EVERYTHING for you. Then you make edits with your voice. Imagine duplicating Amazon's webstore by just saying, "Make me a ecommerce site identical to amazon" and within 5 seconds it appears instantly on your screen. That might be 10 years down the road, but that is where we are headed. The Holo Deck is about to be real, atleast for PC's.
But if it's identical to Amazon, how would it compete with Amazon? To compete in business you have to differentiate your product. If everyone uses the same LLM o3 how will businesses differentiate their products from those of the competition made with that same LLM like o3?
When will AI solve the P equals NP question? Will humans working with AI therefore be able to break DES and PGP? Goodbye internet. Guess what? Suprise!
As a Software Engineer with 20+ years in the industry, working in both startups and big tech, I would love to see the face of one of these non-technical AI extremists when they realize programming is just a small part of building, operating and maintaining a successful software product (and it's usually the easiest part).
I have 14 years of experience and can confirm. All of a sudden everyone is an expert in AI but time will tell them
What do you think is the number one job OpenAI would benefit from automating? What skill can AI acquire that gives OpenAI an advantage over its competitors? What one skill would give OpenAI’s competitors an advantage over them? What type of expertise do you think is most abundant within OpenAI as a resource to fine tune what they are creating? When a new model comes out, what is the first thing they benchmark it on? What real world thing/tool is an AI best positioned to replace?
So is it worth to study softwarw engineer/ Systems engineer?
@@Mateobjs_ Yes. You are more than a programmer. You are a problem solver. Building and maintaining software will continue to change and become higher level. We were using punch cards in the 70s, then came higher level languages, now we have AI assistants to greatly improve productivity (which I think is a good thing), and it will be different in 10 years from now.
@@Mateobjs_ Yes. You are more than a programmer. You are a problem solver. Building and maintaining software will continue changing to become higher level and you have to adapt. We were using punch cards in the 70s, then came higher level languages like C, now we have AI assistants to boost productivity (which I think is a good thing), and it will be different in 10 years from now.
o3 outperforms programmers, which is something much more difficult to do at a high level than creating videos like this one.
while this is true that software engineers should be taking action regarding their careers, I would be much more worried if I was someone doing RUclips videos.
Until it can read my entire codebase, analyze it, make it run more efficiently, fully compile it, and, if it fails to compile, search the code for errors, fix them, and get it to run, it's still a few years away.
Thats sound like a monolithic application . Like trying to use ink pen in space Not going to happen nor anyone have time to do it. Simple use pencil in space or microservices for same service
dude, it can. Right now. Just that 03 hasn't been released to the public yet.
@@echabbewalwell once you get to hundreds of microservices you are glad to have a monolith.
@@christophercarson3675can it, really?
@@christophercarson3675in a highly theoretical case where it's only trained on specific test questions it can. That doesn't change the fact it's only infrastructure most of the tech sector can't afford nor would they have the expertise to implement in house training data without hiring a dedicated team to engineer solutions for a specific use case. It isn't as simple as just turn on and go
They trained it on 75% of the questions from that test. Read the white paper.
Open AI gets a ‘C’ on an evaluation it was tuned for.
Less scary now?
yes, they trained it on the training set...
you cannot "test" on Frontier Math evaluation : even humans mostly fails at these
I highly doubt that they discarded cross validation and trained on the test data.
The arc test are novel questions that haven't been seen, I believe they are generated but im not sure
@@micahwilliams1826 no , they're tests that humans can do very easily , but that AI cannot .
it's also the reason why o3 is not AGI, there are tests you can easily understand, yet o3 struggles.
You can submit your own tests to ARC , I think they have a github for this
As a developer with some experience, I work closely with a senior and near-senior developer, focusing more on planning and some coding in the private sector. Satya Nadella put it best: don’t worry about programming disappearing-worry about software as a whole becoming obsolete. At its core, software is just a UI for a database with business logic.
With Moore’s Law driving hardware efficiency and AI advancing rapidly, traditional software is evolving into AI agents and LLMs, eliminating the need for apps or typing into interfaces. Businesses, however, often resist change due to inertia-a phenomenon akin to the "frog in boiling water" analogy, where gradual changes go unnoticed until it's too late. This shift will redefine many professions, including programming, but it also opens up opportunities for those who adapt to new technologies and embrace AI-driven innovation.
Factory automation moved slower than was possible because there were sunk costs in existing factories and equipment and new equipment was only added as old equipment and processes started to need replacement. I don’t see that being a factor with AI since it allows a business to reduce facility size, close offices, and decrease head count.
2028: "okay we have nerfed o4 to death BUT oh boy o5 will be AGI "
AI is underrated
@Warley.Araujo if you're coding at script kiddie level
@@hendrx well it certainly got better
@@hendrx well, another ignorant one that will cry in a year or two...
edit: Also, o1 was revealed a couple of months ago, and they skipped o2 entirely. We will have o6 or o7 before the end of 2025 at this pace, and it will definitely be better than every human developer.
When Orion releases next year by December 2025 and the cost to operate O3 falls below $1,000, things are going to get weird. The $1,000 price tag won't last for a year. OpenAI or some other company is going to bring the cost of an O3 model down to O1 prices.
Conservative estimate: O3 outperforms 99.99942% of developers worldwide (upper limit: 99.99965%)! Incredible performance, but definitely comes with a hefty price tag.
but it outperforms them in competitive programming... which is impressive. but is far away from enterprise programming.
In competitive programming, which has nothing to do with real world programming.
fortunally I was also better than 99.999% of other programmers
Beats 99% in benchmark and still useless in real life problems. Stop training AI for beating benchmark, start training for everyday use
how do you know it's useless for real life problems? have you used o3?
You REALLY aren't tuned into what's going.
I build AI automations for clients...real life use cases.
This will translate and AMPLIFY everything.
Sure if your job is eating cheeseburgers all day, you wont be affected.
But for those of us gainfully employed, this will be big.
SWE bench
@@AirSandFire it costs 3000 dolars for easy benchmark, it is useless
@@mrd6869 i make real life software and no mather what benchmark AI is breaking, it still generate worse code than any junior that i know. And now it costs 3000$ for one tasks for o3, it's more than the lowest salary for a MONTH at my company
i get paid $500 a month soo i'm cheaper than AI
wait until chinese AI come
@@thirien59 when that time comes, i'll do construction work ))
@@aziz9488 The construction work that autonomous robots will be able to do day and night 10x faster?
@@aziz9488Construction work? When just thirty to forty percent of cognitive workers are unemployed, how much construction work do you think there will be? The economy won’t be booming, that’s for certain. When that many people lose their jobs, we’re talking millions of people globally defaulting on mortgages, credit cards, car loans, etc. leading to a banking crisis, massive drops in tax revenue , a consumption collapse, rise in crime, and so on. Whatever construction jobs exist, there will be a rush of hopeful workers competing for those jobs.
@@aziz9488Wait until Chinese robots come
That chart on the thumbnail makes it look like 88 is at least 20% bigger than 85
the thing is... when errors arise, who will be to blame? i think companies need someone to blame for errors, first and foremost, and it's not possible to blame a machine that doesn't care. that is, if users even care about the quality of the software they use. the direction seems to be software becomes increasingly buggy and bloated, no one to blame because it passes test, user doesn't care and will just refresh the page. be the change you wanna see, don't use bugged paid software, and go the extra mile to ensure quality in the software you produce
The "low" cost version of it is 20$ per query, which should in fact make it very viable for a lot of tasks. Yes, it scores lower on reasoning, but if it can do a day's worth of coding in more down-to-earth use cases for 20$... it's an absolute bargain. However, it would also depend on the max input tokens value. If it's too low, it might still be less useful for real projects than simpler models like Gemini which have this aspect covered better (1m+ input). Also, let's not forget that they hardly had time to optimize it. It could be significantly cheaper by the time of release.
I'm kind of worried i just started to learn program and i like it but now idk anymore :/ should i stop or continue?
It is strange to compare a tractor to a farmer. The biggest difference from humans in ai is that automation is possible.
It´s funny that OpenAI already promotes O3 as "AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is finally here" when in reality it´s just the next step of AI.
It's because once they say they have achieved AGI they get a huge chunk of money as part of a milestone payment that is defined in one of their contracts with Microsoft
OpenAI has specifically said they are on the path to AGI, which is not controversial. All frontier labs are on this path… whether it’s a 2 year path or a 20 year path. But OpenAI did not call o3 AGI. Many OpenAI fans and sensationalist content creators commenting on o3 are calling it that, but OpenAI is not.
AI could never *design* systems, it can only code. Learning just coding was not enough either way. That’s why bootcamps and self-learning have low success ratio. What will change in the near future? Monkey programmers will become obsolete. Developers and software engineers that participate actively in designing the software architecture have no fear. Instead of whining about AI taking your job, upgrade yourselves from a programming monkey to a designer.
And you are talking about the 10% of jobs
@@meme_Overflow I don't believe it's such a low percentage. But I don't necessarily believe it's a bad thing. As Excel rose the number of accountants, AI could rose the number of software engineers. The job market, yes, it's changing and we must conform to it, but skillfulness is NEVER wasted.
Famous last words… this is the dumbest it will ever be And it’s performing like this. You will be replaced, it’s just a matter of when.
La ia si podrá diseñar sistemas, solo les falta algo de tiempo
@@jonathanduran3442 We can't even solve the P=NP problem yet. LLMs are just fancy autocomplete engines.
If I interview a person, I have a few leetcode questions i know well that I would ask the candidate to solve. This is to get an idea of how the person thinks and how they work. It is a small qualifier of what they can do and how they work. If I were to evaluate an AI, it would be way more constrained. I would have it solve a large problem, like give a set of files, parse them and create a database model, and classify the data for me with specified categories. Then i want it to ask me about requirements, like a human would have to. Otherwise, it will all come down to me to do all the useful work.
Programming as a career becomes more select. You can stay in denial but keep in mind this is the worse it will ever be! Microsoft CEO was right when he said that AI will replace the application layer to interact with data.
where was it "launched" or "released" ???
The seller explaining us how good is the product he sells.
What people don't understand is that when it can make software then it can also use it. So everyone who uses Software is now useless.
😂😂🤣🤣Too many blue pills for you?
If ai can beat programmers, wouldn't it also beat every white collar worker?
Why would i need OpenAI or Microsoft when AI beats all programmers?
that exponential scale on the bottom. yeah i doubt a single prompt is worth that much for a single dev. or able to replace one cost effectively...
But even with all of those improvements, companies value their privacy and data more than anything, so from my perspective it’s difficult to think that AI will replace programmers if the cost of creating software by an AI is sharing all of the data with another company.
What do you all think?
Occupations change, come and go. What the work consists of changes.
Before refrigerators there were iceboxes, cabinets cooled by ice. At that time there was a market for ice delivery. That market is gone now.
What developers do has changed some during the 40 years I have been working with computers. The web didn't exist in 1980. Programming languages that were common back then are not so common today; instead new languages have come. Developer environments have improved a lot.
The developer job will continue to change. AI will help developers even more than today. The role of the developers might change to be more about prompt engineering. But for quite a while, I think, classical developers will still be needed, especially for those parts that AI's don't know very well.
Who are those smart people saying this is the end of programming? I just want to know.
People who could never get a programming job
Who tf cares about the near & medium timeframe? Do you even realize what you are lowkey admitting ?
Secondly, how smart would you have to be, to outcompete the other applicants, to finally become that sole-employee who would work at the company?
I will leave this here: Actually, Horses are still for hire for transportation even in the most industrialized cities. It's just that nobody in the right senses will do so.
They are hire for show-off these days. That's their new purpose.
I love how people keep jumping on this AI replacing programmers thing. I use AI every day and I can tell you AI cannot code worth ship. Sure it can do basic coding but it cannot create a simple POJO that performs a complex function. It also cannot, in any shape or form, create code from pseudocode. I have tried a ton of different models and nothing. In fact the only way AI has worked for me is to assist in creating very basic code, and if supervised closely it can create some test code but I have little faith in that as well. I lost an entire day of coding because the previous programmer used AI to do 80% code completion and the code was so borked that the AI created test code only worked with the exact SAME input every single time. If you altered the input to the test code at all for the different values that can be absorbed by the code it failed. So when someone says AI can code better than a programmer... well that is just not true, it cannot take in complex prompts to create an application, no matter how detailed the prompt. It also cannot create code to log into certain access points, not wifi here but servers and DB's, it simply doesn't understand it. I even gave a local AI model my code that works 100% and it could not create a simple login to a DB to create a DB query that worked. I had to go in and tell it exactly what was wrong and after it fixed the code it broke other code. So no, again, AI cannot, at all, in any way fashion or form create complex, code and therefor it cannot replace programmers.
I wouldn't sound so absolute. AI is currently in its infancy. ChatGPT came out in 2022 and couldn't code at all. It's now 2024/2025... and there are claims that the unreleased model can code better than 99% of coders. Though that yet to be seen... if the claims are true, what level do you think it will be at a few years from now? Of course, no one wants AI to put humans out of work, but don't be so naive....
So, is our software engineering career dead by AI or what, please advice...🙏🙏🙏
no, economy fucked the career in the first place, nobody that actually knows shit about llm says they are replacing softwares engineers, it's probably the end of frontends taking one week to turn a button from red to blue tho
yes
At this point, nobody cares anymore. Life goes on. We've been seeing this benchmarks for the last couple of years. Juniors are still being hired in droves, there's still devs in demand, etc.
Go face your code. In the end, it's just another toolbox 🤷
and it will be like that, as senior will always be retiring and without any juniors you will left chatgpt copy itself with no innovation. But still, interesting times as this is something that those re***ds from high management will never understand, they are not technical and they dont care.
Most large companies are firing developers not hiring.
@OnigoroshiZero As companies are firing devs, their hiring devs again, even overseas. Hence, devs are still hired in droves, even all over the world.
This is the 41 month of AI replacing every developer next month
Well, that's because the previous releases we're all hype that didn't meet anyone's expectations. But having an AI that can code better than 99% of humans on the planet is a different story. Will it happen next month? Nah... But if it's at this level now, where will it be in five years? It'll be at a level we can't comprehend.
Learned to not starve
eh I think it'll just make coders more productive, thus increasing their marginal revenue product, and making them more valuable. The ability to google stack overflow, and really good IDEs was a slightly bigger change but this is still a big deal.
Yeah you put this model behind Cursor or Aider, it's gonna be fierce.
I expect collateral damage behind this.
Hi! what is interesting in 3 points that you have mentioned at the end - this is more or less senior level - but seniors not appearing from nothing - they are juniors gone through all the stages. but if ai will overtake jun/middle layer? I also watched your video about 174 law. And i have an idea that all this is interconnected, i.e. with this law they forcing everybody to hair "virtual developers" - as a sequence to increase dependence from AI hardware/software to pay off this 1 trillion investments that big techs already made to not loose their money.
Coders - Learn to plumb
We are cooked mn
Next stop, Customers, good luck with that one AI.
I'm still not afraid of AI :)
you still need to be able to read the code and as a programmer. if you have no idea what the code does.
Can't wait for the new administration to cut all social programs and "get people back to work" as AI takes more and more jobs.
Good times ahead. By the end of these four years unemployment will increase dramatically
Open AI should pay us all the data they took from us lol
We are cooked
Cooking skills will still be sought after and its fun.
Dw, I’ll start a new channel - Internet Made Cooker
@@InternetMadeCoder i'll subscribe to it
Haha love that reply@@InternetMadeCoder
You know I like your analogy of a farmer 200 years ago , but the thing is now it's not only about farming or coding , it's called AGI , so AI could replace anything technically...
All their models now aren't good in code like claude
😮 behold programmer and despair😮for i am death 💀 i am master mold😮
we are cooked
someone please make an anti ai.......
GET THE WATER NIBBA
Now I don't know to stsrt programining I have 33 year And I don't now when I stop learning it will be not enough.
Juz chyba lepiej sobie dac spokoj
You use it to program
AI will take everything long term, specially AI.... the greater ones will adapt!
Ils vont pointer au chomage pour 90% et le dernier dira aux ia quoi faire
have zou acctualz tried to make GTP code? it suck ass
People think its only going to go so far and then stop. Its not, its going to end up being star trek level good where you just give it a prompt and it generates EVERYTHING for you. Then you make edits with your voice. Imagine duplicating Amazon's webstore by just saying, "Make me a ecommerce site identical to amazon" and within 5 seconds it appears instantly on your screen. That might be 10 years down the road, but that is where we are headed. The Holo Deck is about to be real, atleast for PC's.
lol ok buddy
"if cars have wheels today oh boy they'll be able to fly tomorrow"
But if it's identical to Amazon, how would it compete with Amazon? To compete in business you have to differentiate your product. If everyone uses the same LLM o3 how will businesses differentiate their products from those of the competition made with that same LLM like o3?
@@imeakdo7 more importantly there is an entire infrastructure and architecture that allows amazon to be amazon, you cant just "code" it
@@az8039 exactly. Just having ai will not allow you to make a successful competitor to Amazon or any large website
Programming can never end. It will only bring more people into the field. Ai is only a tool and nothing more
bro, do you believe in openai ?😂😂
Cope harder haha
In which universe? Nah, not even close.
See you in a couple of years.
Time to read goldpost and copium in the comments under yet another AI content while I'm packing my stuff to become homeless
You're a very bad programmer if any of this automates you
@@hendrx keep coping.
@@OnigoroshiZeroHe’s not. No real engineer is scared of autocomplete.
hype
Ignorance.
When will AI solve the P equals NP question?
Will humans working with AI therefore be able to break DES and PGP?
Goodbye internet.
Guess what? Suprise!