Which is why we need the opposition to force it through when the government is in a minority position. If the CPC, NDP, and Bloc could agree on a new system, they could just impose it on the Liberals without Trudeau's consent.
@@SylviusTheMadThe thing is, they wont agree unless it benefits them. Trudeau was the first major party to run on it, iirc, only to abandon it once they got in and they realized it wouldnt be good for them. They and the CPC are the parties that benefit most from first past the post.
WE MUST HAVE A SAY on a change in electoral system. I find it very offensive to Canadians to call us too dumb to decide how we ought to vote in the future!!! We really do have opinions on voting systems and are owed the chance to vote on it. Too much in our country and province is decided without our consent!
Canadians Should Create a CANADAFIRST Government . ONE PARTY SYSTEM. and elect the best HIRE for the Jobs . in our our public services Party Politics . is adversarial - it divides Canadians and its wasteful
New Zealand used to have FPTP which resulted with two-party system and gave awkward political outcomes (such as in 1981, National Party won the majority of seats even though they were narrowly 2nd on popular vote). Then in 1990s, they changed their electoral system to MMP. Nowadays, they have 5 parties in the parliament and all of them got a seat share close to their voting share.
Maybe if we understand why there is one , and what is its reason for being there. But I do believe that their should be one from each province but be elected by their own people and represent the people who voted for them.
@@edwardst-pierre1020 The Senate was established for the ruling class to have a veto over the will of us peasants, that's the only reason it exists. If that wasn't the case, they'd have no problem holding Senate elections, but they'll never do that, because it defeats the purpose of the Senate.
@@strangerdanger1202 the purpose of the Senate is to debate changes to the law or something in the constitution and it's up to the people to ask those running for public office to make sure that happens.
@@edwardst-pierre1020 no, the main function of the Senate is to overturn any legislation that the upper classes might see as a threat to their position in life, it's always been that way. Sometimes textbooks and teachers lie about the true role of government, they don't want the plebs aware of this, because once you understand that appointed members of the Senate hold the exact same authority as elected officials, you start to see how our democracy isn't what we were taught it was.
I like the idea of a ranked system as it would reduce the problem of vote splitting. The question is if people who can't even put a "X" properly will be able to rank parties.
regardless of the problems prop rep has, I still haven't heard a counter to the argument that it's "more democratic". Seems like that alone should be telling us that we should be going for it.
I really believe the way the federal government is running is not very democratic. I believe it's time that the premier's of the provinces should be appointed to the federal cabinet and not the friends of the PM. It the same as a mayor of a town having all of their family be in every position in the mayor's office. The premier's of the provinces are voted by millions of people of their region and not a friend of the PM who won with 5 thousand votes in a town that no one has ever heard of.
my 'ideal' voting system would be one where every local constituency ballot counts for both local AND national representation. the elected local constituency member is the one that gets the majority of citizen votes via ranked choice ballots, whether from 1st, 2d, or 3d place votes as the least popular candidates are dropped in each counting round until a majority is reached. each ballot would also include a preferred party platform selection to determine the makeup of parliament. non.constituency members would consist of those who had achieved the highest percentage 2d place votes from the constituency elections (though this could be modified by each party to ensure regional representation).
The one that gives us the same proportion of seats as the popular vote (mixed-member proportional) would be my favorite system. But it would reduce the power of the Liberal Party, so I doubt it would be championed by the government or the mainstream chattering class any time soon who'd rather keep suppressing minority parties.
The problem is if we elect 8 people of every riding instead of just the one then how many politicians do you expect to be in the house of Commons. I don't believe this will work if we do it any other way.
@@edwardst-pierre1020 There won't be eight people out of every riding. You only add MPs to make up for the lacking proportional representation. In this last election, it was 25-30 missing seats for the entire country to give to the parties that got shortchanged. And this was an unusually mismatched election when it cames to seats vs. proportion.
@@edwardst-pierre1020 The same as now. Half would be directly elected, and the others would be added to make up the proportional numbers. This is exactly how German elections work.
@@SylviusTheMad so you mean we would double the politicians in government. Right now many of those who are in government are not real professionals to be in government. No we need less people in government but more professionals like lawyers, doctors police chiefs . people who are in a professional field serving the public. I don't want to see someone who was a bus driver or someone who cuts hair for a living. Someone who has been Mayor for 10 years can move up the ladder because they served the people and have the experience to do the job. Here in Canada we have many politicians who are in it just because of the power and the pensions.
@@nonmagicmike723 we need less people in government not more , we also need less political parties, I believe 3 is enough . In the Green party wants to have a say they can have candidates run for one of the 3 major parties. Right now around 7 political parties on the ballot but there should only be 3 . today the liberals won with 30 percent of the vote.
Elector reform would be actually sitting down with all Canadians and going through the cracks in the foundation. Coming together and rewrite a proper constitution through constitutional conventions. Just having more slave documents handed to us is not going to solve the corruption we see permeate through the political and wealthy elite classes
@@votejustinout7221 Oh so your feelings then eh? Lets halt our democracy over a matter of your opinion and feelings. Bring some evidence or go smoke crack with my pillow guy.
For each layer of government in Canada i.e. Federal, Provincial as well as Municipal. - what type of electoral reform would you like to see put into place? I.e. STV, MMP etc.
If a ranked ballot system was introduced. Canada would become a 2 party nation between the Liberals and NDP, while conservative voters never being able to get enough for a majority, so that their preference would trickle to whichever of those two parties is ranked higher on the ballot, even if they're 2nd last.
I have always lived in ridings where the party I wanted to support had no chance of getting elected, and it felt like I was putting my vote in the garbage can. I really look forward to a day, after a system change, where I feel my vote counts for something.
@GNR 1978 FOREVER I don’t really care what the label is. I just asked the simple question now about 5 years ago..... How to remove a sitting prime minister? What I have found is stunning. We have a flawed foundation full of slave laws designed to keep us from the truth. We are NOT a country. The federal government all the way down to municipal governments are CORPORATIONS. We live under admiralty law (law of the sea). We have corruption
Not voting is pretty much saying you don't care...and if you don't care why bother even posting your comments... or is it that you do care but you're saying you don't just too see what the reactions are going to be...and if truly it is that you don't care than you have no right to complain on who or how a party runs a country...you give up that right when you said you won't vote... either way your comment becomes a mute point doesn't it... you can't have you cake and eat it too....
@@megabeaver23 why would I continue to do the same action to expect different results? I am commenting to bring awareness to the fact we have defacto governments who are using our flawed foundation to continue corrupt practices
I think the candidates should compete in a survival game..either hunger games style...or Mantracker style where they are dropped in the middle of the wilderness and given basic survival tools and a map with a location to get to by foot by a certain time/date while being hunted by a man-tracker on horse back. If you get caught, you are out of the race. If you don't reach the goal in time, you are out of the race. If nobody makes the goal, the ones that were caught are eliminated, and the ones who hid and ran out of time will be judged on who made it closest to the goal. No political talking points needed because clearly when they are in office they just do whatever they want anyways.
So we would have a government made up of right wing survivalists, trappers and hunters? I’m sure that would please some (mainly rural) people, but not so much urbanites and suburbanites. How about instead, we require all candidates for office to state their electoral intentions while connected to a polygraph machine?
Congrats to Progressive Conservative party Tories who had the popular vote in 2019 and now in 2021. Government formed by the Liberals. OK then. Wait what now? Green or NDP as the PM? Never gonna happen.
What on earth are you trying to say? I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding of our current electoral system and something like MMP. I think you need to do some more reading on the topic.
@GlobalNews, Can you ask political researchers and PM Justin Trudeau if they believe First Past The Post COULD be responsible for the violent tribalism across democratic nations as of recent? Ask if Ranked Ballots would nip that in the bud as constituents would FEEL as though voting/their vote DOES/DID matter? And if not Ranked Ballots, what one would make citizens feel LESS tribal and less violent?
How about having one vote for prime minister...and then local and premier vote on another vote. Because you may like a prime minister's candidate in one party and a premier of an other party. Or the person in your riding.
@@jgp7414 true but do you know how many political parties there are in Canada. You know at the municipal level there are hundreds of political parties and each one makes it's own rules and people fallow like sheep. And then you have the provincial parties that also make up the rules for their own goals. Then you have the federal parties that once elected only care about spending the taxe payers money and receiving a paycheck and a nice retirement plan. For the sake of democracy we need a three party system that applies to all three levels of government. So for instance the conservative party with have separate wings at the federal, provincial and municipal level but All three fallow the same rules of the party.
The only reform I want. is no donations at all. And no wage or pension at all. Politicians who won't do it for free and without vested interests, are not in it for the voters.
@@bunnyniyori6324 Trump nor senile Biden have anything to do with us. Not paying people for their effort though, is THE silliest plan ever. You need some life experience to understand.
The masks are there to show respect for one another and being vaxed or not people are going to get sick until we create a protocol for everyone to fallow.
First we need honest elections. It's amazing how millions of little pencils got ordered, received, distributed and ended up at the poling stations so quickly. Even pencil marks leave a trace if erased and changed.
@@megabeaver23 It only works that quickly if there is a warehouse in our country that just happens to have Millions of them already (I highly doubt any business would have Millions of them stored on speculation). Anyone who understands supply chains knows it works on ordering , partial payment, manufacturing, final payment, shipping, receiving and confirming, dividing quantities, reshipment, bla, bla. In a perfect scenario that is normally a minimum of 6 months.
@@lj6152 So you think that elections canada doesn't plan their voting ahead of time to have access to pencils? Do you also then not believe in staples, walmart, costco, Home hardware or any other mass retailer doesn't have access to a surplus of writing utensils?
Being that it's 2021 and we are supposed to be smart , why are we still using a old system that can be played with. And why can't we have a better system to identify each other,I have a wallet full of cards I have 1 for this and 1 for that , I have around 12 cards with 2 of them with a picture of me. Why can't we just have one card that does everything. We need one card with a picture and a lot of numbers that can be used for everything.
@@edwardst-pierre1020 Don't worry, before long it'll all be in one little app on your phone. Then you can access it all...opps, someone just went "postal" on their digital job and you no longer exist. Maybe you got a speeding ticket, tsk tsk, you just lost some credit points so no fuel for you this month. It's already happening in other countries. I guess being old and not very smart is why I'm able to function with only three cards in my daily life, only when needed for that day do I take the fourth one.
First passed the post is the best way. When you have 5 different parties you will never have real elections . Now we have 3 parties on the left and 2 parties on the left. The best way is a three party system and for the other parties they should join one of the three major parties
Who is that clown telling voters aren’t interested. If these issues were not being done in the dark, we would have an informed decision to make instead of having to deal with these underhanded politicians.
We went thru this. Then the party that wins, says "nah i was just fking wit ya lol".
Which is why we need the opposition to force it through when the government is in a minority position.
If the CPC, NDP, and Bloc could agree on a new system, they could just impose it on the Liberals without Trudeau's consent.
@@SylviusTheMadThe thing is, they wont agree unless it benefits them. Trudeau was the first major party to run on it, iirc, only to abandon it once they got in and they realized it wouldnt be good for them.
They and the CPC are the parties that benefit most from first past the post.
WE MUST HAVE A SAY on a change in electoral system. I find it very offensive to Canadians to call us too dumb to decide how we ought to vote in the future!!! We really do have opinions on voting systems and are owed the chance to vote on it. Too much in our country and province is decided without our consent!
Canadians Should Create a CANADAFIRST Government .
ONE PARTY SYSTEM.
and elect the best HIRE for the Jobs . in our our public services
Party Politics . is adversarial - it divides Canadians and its wasteful
@@canadafirstdog9051 Your speech is incomprehensible
@@canadafirstdog9051 I like having a democracy thank you very much
New Zealand used to have FPTP which resulted with two-party system and gave awkward political outcomes (such as in 1981, National Party won the majority of seats even though they were narrowly 2nd on popular vote). Then in 1990s, they changed their electoral system to MMP. Nowadays, they have 5 parties in the parliament and all of them got a seat share close to their voting share.
This is one of the best and unbiased pieces Global News has done.
Thank you for a clear explanation.
Two bottom lines:
1. People should have the power to say
2. The new electoral system should promote country unity, not power up party's power.
So you want to have a referendum over the electoral system?
How exactly will this bring in more unity.
Abolishing the Senate would be a step in the right direction.
Maybe if we understand why there is one , and what is its reason for being there. But I do believe that their should be one from each province but be elected by their own people and represent the people who voted for them.
@@edwardst-pierre1020 The Senate was established for the ruling class to have a veto over the will of us peasants, that's the only reason it exists. If that wasn't the case, they'd have no problem holding Senate elections, but they'll never do that, because it defeats the purpose of the Senate.
@@strangerdanger1202 the purpose of the Senate is to debate changes to the law or something in the constitution and it's up to the people to ask those running for public office to make sure that happens.
@@edwardst-pierre1020 no, the main function of the Senate is to overturn any legislation that the upper classes might see as a threat to their position in life, it's always been that way. Sometimes textbooks and teachers lie about the true role of government, they don't want the plebs aware of this, because once you understand that appointed members of the Senate hold the exact same authority as elected officials, you start to see how our democracy isn't what we were taught it was.
Call your MP’s office and ask them to support motion M 86 for a Citizens’ Assembly on electoral reform. It’s up for a vote in the House early Feb ‘24!
I like the idea of a ranked system as it would reduce the problem of vote splitting. The question is if people who can't even put a "X" properly will be able to rank parties.
regardless of the problems prop rep has, I still haven't heard a counter to the argument that it's "more democratic". Seems like that alone should be telling us that we should be going for it.
I disagree that ‘people don’t really have opinions on voting systems’.
Idk man, on voting day I saw a guy trying to explain to a voter that Trudeau was from the Liberal party.
Proportional representation is long overdue in this country We need change that’s for sure !
That is an abortion and will destroy this country.
FPTP is archaic, outmoded, and only utilized in an extremely small percentage of nations across the globe. We need proportional representation.
Who cares. It works and has worked for hundreds of years. Why should we change it now. It cause your party loses elections.
Remember when Trudeau promised electoral reform in 2015? Pepperidge Farm remembers
Carmen my love, I dance so sweet for you.
We need Electoral Reform now.
I really believe the way the federal government is running is not very democratic. I believe it's time that the premier's of the provinces should be appointed to the federal cabinet and not the friends of the PM. It the same as a mayor of a town having all of their family be in every position in the mayor's office. The premier's of the provinces are voted by millions of people of their region and not a friend of the PM who won with 5 thousand votes in a town that no one has ever heard of.
my 'ideal' voting system would be one where every local constituency ballot counts for both local AND national representation. the elected local constituency member is the one that gets the majority of citizen votes via ranked choice ballots, whether from 1st, 2d, or 3d place votes as the least popular candidates are dropped in each counting round until a majority is reached. each ballot would also include a preferred party platform selection to determine the makeup of parliament. non.constituency members would consist of those who had achieved the highest percentage 2d place votes from the constituency elections (though this could be modified by each party to ensure regional representation).
A more ideologically diverse parliament would be better for Canada. Any system that promotes strategic voting undermines that.
The one that gives us the same proportion of seats as the popular vote (mixed-member proportional) would be my favorite system. But it would reduce the power of the Liberal Party, so I doubt it would be championed by the government or the mainstream chattering class any time soon who'd rather keep suppressing minority parties.
The problem is if we elect 8 people of every riding instead of just the one then how many politicians do you expect to be in the house of Commons. I don't believe this will work if we do it any other way.
@@edwardst-pierre1020 There won't be eight people out of every riding. You only add MPs to make up for the lacking proportional representation. In this last election, it was 25-30 missing seats for the entire country to give to the parties that got shortchanged. And this was an unusually mismatched election when it cames to seats vs. proportion.
@@edwardst-pierre1020 The same as now. Half would be directly elected, and the others would be added to make up the proportional numbers.
This is exactly how German elections work.
@@SylviusTheMad so you mean we would double the politicians in government. Right now many of those who are in government are not real professionals to be in government. No we need less people in government but more professionals like lawyers, doctors police chiefs . people who are in a professional field serving the public. I don't want to see someone who was a bus driver or someone who cuts hair for a living. Someone who has been Mayor for 10 years can move up the ladder because they served the people and have the experience to do the job. Here in Canada we have many politicians who are in it just because of the power and the pensions.
@@nonmagicmike723 we need less people in government not more , we also need less political parties, I believe 3 is enough . In the Green party wants to have a say they can have candidates run for one of the 3 major parties. Right now around 7 political parties on the ballot but there should only be 3 . today the liberals won with 30 percent of the vote.
Elector reform would be actually sitting down with all Canadians and going through the cracks in the foundation. Coming together and rewrite a proper constitution through constitutional conventions. Just having more slave documents handed to us is not going to solve the corruption we see permeate through the political and wealthy elite classes
MMP seems way too overcomplicated. I think Ranked Choice voting would be a better alternative
Key battleground ridings that no doubt were "tweaked" in favour of the L party!
Dude don't try spreading voter misinformation, we saw what it did to the US, don't bring that kind of thing here.
@@megabeaver23 Quick, get to your safe space.
@@votejustinout7221 : how was it tweaked?
Serious question!
@@sirdavidoftor3413 My opinion is that it wasn't a legit outcome due to the outpouring of hatred and despise for justin trudeau.
@@votejustinout7221 Oh so your feelings then eh? Lets halt our democracy over a matter of your opinion and feelings. Bring some evidence or go smoke crack with my pillow guy.
For each layer of government in Canada i.e. Federal, Provincial as well as Municipal. - what type of electoral reform would you like to see put into place? I.e. STV, MMP etc.
If a ranked ballot system was introduced. Canada would become a 2 party nation between the Liberals and NDP, while conservative voters never being able to get enough for a majority, so that their preference would trickle to whichever of those two parties is ranked higher on the ballot, even if they're 2nd last.
MMP is the worst form of PR
Selected not elected
Canada should have a STV like they have in Ireland.
You can rank the parties from best to worst and vote in the candidate you actually believe.
I have always lived in ridings where the party I wanted to support had no chance of getting elected, and it felt like I was putting my vote in the garbage can. I really look forward to a day, after a system change, where I feel my vote counts for something.
Why not ranked MMP. You rank your local candidates then vote for your favourite party.
Wow.. they included the PPC..
Well yeah what kinda answers that make why don't we just relate the number of the votes with number of seats and leave it at that!!
I give up on voting in Canada !
I can’t vote. For me to vote would be like me saying that corruption is ok.
@GNR 1978 FOREVER I don’t really care what the label is. I just asked the simple question now about 5 years ago..... How to remove a sitting prime minister? What I have found is stunning. We have a flawed foundation full of slave laws designed to keep us from the truth. We are NOT a country. The federal government all the way down to municipal governments are CORPORATIONS. We live under admiralty law (law of the sea). We have corruption
At least spoil your vote then.
Not voting is pretty much saying you don't care...and if you don't care why bother even posting your comments... or is it that you do care but you're saying you don't just too see what the reactions are going to be...and if truly it is that you don't care than you have no right to complain on who or how a party runs a country...you give up that right when you said you won't vote... either way your comment becomes a mute point doesn't it... you can't have you cake and eat it too....
@@megabeaver23 why would I continue to do the same action to expect different results? I am commenting to bring awareness to the fact we have defacto governments who are using our flawed foundation to continue corrupt practices
Why can't we have this?!?!?
time to change the voting system.Break a promise your out.
The key is not how to count vote. The key is to set clear boundary to what the winner can do to ppl.
FPP is the best system, the other systems are confusing. You want big-tent-parties winning and fringe parties losing as much as possible.
First past the post only works fairly in a two-party system.
so which country on earth has it right for representative democracy?
Germany's system is terrific, but even better is the version used in the German state of Baden-Württemberg.
Australia.
I think the candidates should compete in a survival game..either hunger games style...or Mantracker style where they are dropped in the middle of the wilderness and given basic survival tools and a map with a location to get to by foot by a certain time/date while being hunted by a man-tracker on horse back. If you get caught, you are out of the race. If you don't reach the goal in time, you are out of the race. If nobody makes the goal, the ones that were caught are eliminated, and the ones who hid and ran out of time will be judged on who made it closest to the goal. No political talking points needed because clearly when they are in office they just do whatever they want anyways.
So we would have a government made up of right wing survivalists, trappers and hunters? I’m sure that would please some (mainly rural) people, but not so much urbanites and suburbanites. How about instead, we require all candidates for office to state their electoral intentions while connected to a polygraph machine?
So your idea is to have the best liar in office then, so no different than today but with one more hoop to jump through.
Who cares, as long as it doesn't allow another Justin Trudeau to become PM.
Good vid
Congrats to Progressive Conservative party Tories who had the popular vote in 2019 and now in 2021. Government formed by the Liberals. OK then. Wait what now? Green or NDP as the PM? Never gonna happen.
What on earth are you trying to say? I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding of our current electoral system and something like MMP. I think you need to do some more reading on the topic.
Canadafirstdog
is the new canadafirst account handle .
google keeps putting us in the dog house - for exposing to much .
@@canadafirstdog9051 it’s “too much”. Why is everything a conspiracy to you people?
@@ransom182 do you mean the people who do research on everything
compared
to the people who do no research ?
We have 2 provinces (Ontario and Quebec) the rest are little more than colonies, especially the West.
Goooood
@GlobalNews, Can you ask political researchers and PM Justin Trudeau if they believe First Past The Post COULD be responsible for the violent tribalism across democratic nations as of recent? Ask if Ranked Ballots would nip that in the bud as constituents would FEEL as though voting/their vote DOES/DID matter? And if not Ranked Ballots, what one would make citizens feel LESS tribal and less violent?
Proportional representation is the way to go.
Go blue
One voice one vote. This fractional way of voting invites the same issues which are now found in the 2020 election.
33%
How about having one vote for prime minister...and then local and premier vote on another vote. Because you may like a prime minister's candidate in one party and a premier of an other party. Or the person in your riding.
@@jgp7414 true but do you know how many political parties there are in Canada. You know at the municipal level there are hundreds of political parties and each one makes it's own rules and people fallow like sheep. And then you have the provincial parties that also make up the rules for their own goals. Then you have the federal parties that once elected only care about spending the taxe payers money and receiving a paycheck and a nice retirement plan. For the sake of democracy we need a three party system that applies to all three levels of government. So for instance the conservative party with have separate wings at the federal, provincial and municipal level but All three fallow the same rules of the party.
Because a Prime Minister can still be removed by the House of Commons. Electing them for 4 or 6 years would be even worse.
Please remember Afghanistan 🇦🇫.
I will never forget Afghanistan.
The only reform I want. is no donations at all. And no wage or pension at all. Politicians who won't do it for free and without vested interests, are not in it for the voters.
Congratulations. Only independently wealthy people will govern.
That's about the silliest plan ever.
@@OldWolf9226 Yep. But not THE silliest plan ever. That award goes to voting for Trump :)
@@bunnyniyori6324 Trump nor senile Biden have anything to do with us. Not paying people for their effort though, is THE silliest plan ever. You need some life experience to understand.
@@OldWolf9226 hmm I'm 60 ex military a parent married and born Canadian. What about your life experiences?
I was able to get my online business started after transacting enough successful deals with 👆
Duh? lol.
For heaven sake‘s, take those masks off, they don’t even work.
@GNR 1978 FOREVER get back there sheep.
The masks are there to show respect for one another and being vaxed or not people are going to get sick until we create a protocol for everyone to fallow.
Yeah and the moon is made of cheese
LET'S GO BRANDON AND JUSTIN
First we need honest elections. It's amazing how millions of little pencils got ordered, received, distributed and ended up at the poling stations so quickly. Even pencil marks leave a trace if erased and changed.
How is that suspicious, that's how our supply chains work.
@@megabeaver23 It only works that quickly if there is a warehouse in our country that just happens to have Millions of them already (I highly doubt any business would have Millions of them stored on speculation). Anyone who understands supply chains knows it works on ordering , partial payment, manufacturing, final payment, shipping, receiving and confirming, dividing quantities, reshipment, bla, bla. In a perfect scenario that is normally a minimum of 6 months.
@@lj6152 So you think that elections canada doesn't plan their voting ahead of time to have access to pencils? Do you also then not believe in staples, walmart, costco, Home hardware or any other mass retailer doesn't have access to a surplus of writing utensils?
Being that it's 2021 and we are supposed to be smart , why are we still using a old system that can be played with. And why can't we have a better system to identify each other,I have a wallet full of cards I have 1 for this and 1 for that , I have around 12 cards with 2 of them with a picture of me. Why can't we just have one card that does everything. We need one card with a picture and a lot of numbers that can be used for everything.
@@edwardst-pierre1020 Don't worry, before long it'll all be in one little app on your phone. Then you can access it all...opps, someone just went "postal" on their digital job and you no longer exist. Maybe you got a speeding ticket, tsk tsk, you just lost some credit points so no fuel for you this month. It's already happening in other countries. I guess being old and not very smart is why I'm able to function with only three cards in my daily life, only when needed for that day do I take the fourth one.
We don't want reform !!
We want total replacement !!
Let's go Brandon !!!
Let's go Brandon!
First passed the post is the best way. When you have 5 different parties you will never have real elections . Now we have 3 parties on the left and 2 parties on the left. The best way is a three party system and for the other parties they should join one of the three major parties
Who is that clown telling voters aren’t interested. If these issues were not being done in the dark, we would have an informed decision to make instead of having to deal with these underhanded politicians.
I was able to get my online business started after transacting enough successful deals with 👆