Complex Analysis 31 | Application of the Identity Theorem

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 дек 2024

Комментарии • 24

  • @StratosFair
    @StratosFair 2 года назад +1

    I'm loving this series so far, thank you so much for your work !!

  • @narfwhals7843
    @narfwhals7843 Год назад +1

    Knowing the identity theorem Analytic Continuation seems basically trivial.
    All other sources I have found make it seem much more complicated than "find the powerseries. You're done".
    Why do we have the extra steps of going through many regions of convergence? Is this to find a path connected domain?

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  Год назад +2

      Thank you very much! I always try to make topic transparent. The Taylor series only exist in a disc. So you might need many discs to cover the whole domain.

    • @narfwhals7843
      @narfwhals7843 Год назад +1

      @@brightsideofmaths I'm not sure I understand that. Do you have a video explaining why the Taylor series only exists on a disk?
      If the disks overlap, isn't that the same series by the identity theorem?
      And I should be able to convert the Taylor series at a point to another power series at an arbitrary point. Doesn't that remove the necessity of a disk?

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  Год назад +1

      Same series means that the coefficients coincide. @@narfwhals7843

    • @narfwhals7843
      @narfwhals7843 Год назад +1

      @@brightsideofmaths right. So if I have two overlapping disks for which the coefficients coincidence in the overlap, which is an open set, then they must coindide everywhere in the domain by the identity theorem. Or did I understand that incorrectly?

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  Год назад +2

      Yes! But don't forget the expansion point for the series.@@narfwhals7843

  • @synaestheziac
    @synaestheziac 2 года назад +3

    So, is the result in this video the same thing as analytic continuation, or am I mixing things up?

  • @vpambs1pt
    @vpambs1pt 2 года назад +1

    Very well described!

  • @RSLT
    @RSLT Год назад +1

    Great video. Thank you very much. Any video regarding the uniqueness of analytic continuation?

  • @whatitmeans
    @whatitmeans 2 года назад

    I have a question about the example: It is a requirement to f(x) to be a smooth function?
    As example, think in this function
    f(x)=1/4*(1-x/2+|1-x/2|)^2
    Does the theorem still holds?

  • @ferry7185
    @ferry7185 10 месяцев назад

    can you explain a bit more why if D is open set, then accumulation point will be in D?

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  10 месяцев назад +1

      What are other possibilities for the accumulation point? And what does "open" mean? :)

  • @RSLT
    @RSLT 2 года назад

    Great Video. Following my comments on your last video. So I like to repeat my question. How can I say this in exact math terms: Assume zeta (s)=zeta(1-s). Therefore because zeta (s)-zeta(1-s) =0 the Sum 1/n^s - Sum 1/n^(1-s) or sum(( 1/n^s) -1/n^(1-s)) converge to zero in the critical strip. I want to use the identity theorem. The challenge is power series 1/n^s is a divergence in the critical strip. Please advise

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  2 года назад +1

      Thank you very much! I guess my comment section is not the right place to discuss such questions.

    • @RSLT
      @RSLT 2 года назад +1

      @@brightsideofmaths .Sure I Just emailed you.