Constructive analysis was an approach to error treatment in behaviorist theorist (up to 1960) which implied that it was the differences between L1 and L2 what was used to reveal and predict errors. Later on, it was Corder who in 1967 distinguised between slips, mistakes and errors. Coder, Ellis and others concluded that most errors were not causes y L1 interference but were learner internal.
OVERGENERALIZATION is an internal cognitive approach at making own rules for the second language. For example if an English learner sees a pattern in verbs, that most verbs end in -ed, they will assume that this is the correct past tense variety, thus ending every word in -ed (drinked, fighted, thinked, walked, eated) in the past tense. This will become a "rule" for them to follow. With IGNORANCE OF RULE RESTRICTION, you need more data to assess the student. Following a student over a semester will grant you the data you need to assess his/her level to be that of fossilization or overgeneralization.
Errors of performance are attached to mistakes as the latter are just incorrect use of the language due to factors such as fatigue, lack of concentration etc. Whereas errors of competence happen as a result of ignorance or a lack of knowledge.
@@martasuarez1568 When it comes to language, "performance" means when you produce the language (by speaking or writing). A student of English will have a cognitive process (which takes place inside the head: thinking, reflecting, building up a vocabulary), and a performance process (speaking or producing). It's safe to say that most language learners will have a higher level of cognitive competance than of the performative competance. This means that a second language learner will often understand a lot of written and spoken language, but lack the competance to utter a response.
thank you so much you helped me to pindown what our professeur said earlier today
Just woow It is a really helpful summary
thank you , but i want to know what is the link btw error analysis and constrctive analysis ...help me i really need this information 😊
Constructive analysis was an approach to error treatment in behaviorist theorist (up to 1960) which implied that it was the differences between L1 and L2 what was used to reveal and predict errors. Later on, it was Corder who in 1967 distinguised between slips, mistakes and errors. Coder, Ellis and others concluded that most errors were not causes y L1 interference but were learner internal.
you are good at reading
Interesting thank you but errors and mistakes are different things yet you use the word mistake to describe an error, bit confusing..
Thanks!! this helps a lot!
how can I distinguish between OVERGENERALIZATION and IGNORANCE OF RULE RESTRICTION and would you please give us more examples. Thank you
OVERGENERALIZATION is an internal cognitive approach at making own rules for the second language. For example if an English learner sees a pattern in verbs, that most verbs end in -ed, they will assume that this is the correct past tense variety, thus ending every word in -ed (drinked, fighted, thinked, walked, eated) in the past tense. This will become a "rule" for them to follow.
With IGNORANCE OF RULE RESTRICTION, you need more data to assess the student. Following a student over a semester will grant you the data you need to assess his/her level to be that of fossilization or overgeneralization.
You're amazing! Thank you! ❤️
thanks a lot Peggy.
Please would you explain to me " of performance"and "some explanations of errors".thanks in advance .
Errors of performance are attached to mistakes as the latter are just incorrect use of the language due to factors such as fatigue, lack of concentration etc. Whereas errors of competence happen as a result of ignorance or a lack of knowledge.
@@martasuarez1568 When it comes to language, "performance" means when you produce the language (by speaking or writing). A student of English will have a cognitive process (which takes place inside the head: thinking, reflecting, building up a vocabulary), and a performance process (speaking or producing).
It's safe to say that most language learners will have a higher level of cognitive competance than of the performative competance. This means that a second language learner will often understand a lot of written and spoken language, but lack the competance to utter a response.
Thank you 🤩🤩
Thank you, this helps me a lot!! ; )
I have a presentation on error analysis 😟
THANKS!
Thanks
Thanks ^^