Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 мар 2019
- ** Subtitles available (English, French and Castillan) **
** Video en Castillan aquí: • Los Megalitos de Tiwan... **
At the 10th Geopolymer Camp in 2018, Prof. Joseph Davidovits presented during his annual keynote his last studies on the Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths.
In November 2017, an international team (a geologist from Universidad San Pablo at Arequipa, Peru and a member of the Geopolymer Institute) went on the site to carry on a survey on these stones.
After different analysis on thin sections and under the electronic microscope, Joseph Davidovits claims that he has found "organic matter in volcanic rock", which is, by nature, impossible.
More information at www.geopolymer.org/archaeolog... 
Наука
I honestly believe he figured out the ancient megalithic "technology", and the great pyramid, its a shame how he's not more popular; he makes the most sense scientifically.
wht technology>>>??its concrete and the holes was drippled out with a stick case closed .caveman play with rocks!!
If you look many sites have spru marks, spru that were not removed,not hand holds but cast marks
@@ABHall-tv9jb Close.
@@ABHall-tv9jb Sprue?
Doesn’t explain quarry marks.
I have been hoping for years that somebody would take thin section samples from ancient megaliths and analyze them. Bravo! Chemistry and Physics work better than speculation.
Exactly.
I'll take facts over speculation every time for accuracy in explanation.
OK, Regarding Puma Punku, the holes in those ditches, those holes in the 45' angle. ETC, etc. Is it about a Mechanism?. Regarding Puma Punku, I don't think it's about a Temple where people came to pray. It is much more like a Complex Mechanism
The holes would make perfect sense under this hypothesis. They could be easily drilled after it set up slightly but wasn't yet super hard
Finally , a scientist research rather than book pushers and misinformed RUclipsrs .
A YT video showing the creation of a stone similar to the megaliths would be gold.
I fear until then lots of time will still be wasted on invalid theories.
Surprisingly hard to find this video even wondered if the site was a modern hoax for tourist $. Never underestimate the ingenuity of human beings, no LGM Deus ex machina required.
he must be good in geopolymers but his methodology in archeology is really bad :
- 6 sites for extraction but he analyses only 2 (D and F)
- at 04:37 we can see some patterns on the left rock althought right rock is smooth. It must be 2 differents rocks with cramps to interlock, not reparation.
- variability in the analyse result show big differences in the different excavation site which are really near, so the main conclusion should be : we haven't identify the good excavation site.
And it's perhaps the reason he didn't analyse A, B, C and E ...
Yet still saying the same thing the book pushers and "misinformed" RUclipsrs which is that mainstream archaeologist dont know what they are talking about
OK, Regarding Puma Punku, the holes in those ditches, those holes in the 45' angle. ETC, etc. Is it about a Mechanism?. Regarding Puma Punku, I don't think it's about a Temple where people came to pray. It is much more like a Complex Mechanism
At last, we have a plausible and believable theory on how the pyramids and monuments in several parts of the world were created! Aliens and deities had nothing to do with it, but human creativity and genius in action! Kudos, professor Joseph. You deserve a Nobel prize!
What about the 1200 ton unfinished obelisk still sitting in the ground.
@@rehankahlon4287 the fact that it couldn't be lifted from the ground is a proof that this particular method didn't work.
i'm speechless. why doesn't this have a half a billion views? get him on rogan with hancock and carlson please.
lmao
Probably because you can’t post the videos.
And mauro biglino
OK, Regarding Puma Punku, the holes in those ditches, those holes in the 45' angle. ETC, etc. Is it about a Mechanism?. Regarding Puma Punku, I don't think it's about a Temple where people came to pray. It is much more like a Complex Mechanism
Because it's nonsense. yw
This is awesome. I'm a little shocked I haven't stumbled across this until now and I'm glad I watched all of it, but really someone needs to summarize and edit this. You cut it to 20 minutes, insert a few more photos and better graphics and this video would have 2 million views.
its not real tard
This megalithic stone softening building technique can be seen throughout antiquity as it all came from the same cult of technology. The answers are out there! Bravo for Professor Davidovits and his associates!
Atlantis
Please present your evidence. I am fascinated.
A solution for a mystery that has been around for so many years is here. In other words the ancient people from Tiwanaku and Pumapunku knew how to make a kind of cement. This is a brilliant work!
Just remember, roman concrete technology was lost for over a thousand years
Roman 😆🤣
@@Radostin-87 Why laughter? It's true.
The capitalization of Roman is vital to understanding this principle.
@@sagecreekwitt3301 found the youtube english teacher
Exactly 1 meter high megalithic well shaped stones...what a coincidence 🤔...from where and how long time ago the metric system origins!?
This is quite a game changer and a long time coming. The fact that archeology professionals seem to have the attitude of if it can't be explained in a easy or established way, they walk away from it.
How does this explain the huge megaliths that have been made and left in quarry? We've also known how the stones were made for thousands of years, maybe tens of thousands.
They ignore any evidence that disproves their theory.
They could be from a different time period.
Can we reproduce these geopolymers? Building structures with such survivability would be very useful.
We do everyday with basic concrete technology. Exact same principle.
This same technology HAS been used extensively for centuries. It's just not noticed by the general public But, there have been engineering papers published about the technology and examples of such all over the world. One just has to dig for the information.
So the megaliths studied, were created artificially with an ancient concrete, with a seemingly complex recipe...
The ancients seemed to be far more knowledgeable & advanced in understanding, than we give tend to give them credit for.
Finally, some hardcore science used to reach true conclusions. Thank you so much ....
Please fund this man and his team of experts possibly studying the megaliths of Egypt and Balbec
I'm only 5 mins in but I already have a question: If the people that built tiwanaku were able to make geopolymer, then why did they repair the red sandstone megaliths with metal clamps instead of filling the cracks with geopolymer?
Once dry and hardened it wouldn't bond anymore. Same with concrete.
Very good question! I think it’s natural stones. Andesite quarry in Peru is best proof for this.
Shame it's arriving only in 2019. Yet we've got billionaires purchasing football clubs for fun, million-dollar baseball cards and other things instead of funding these awesome people, who genuinely help every living soul on this planet to actually know their past.
Agreed
Fantastic and thank you! Please share your work with official media!
So it was basically an ancient form of CONCRETE. Makes total sense. Why would they haul megalithic stones across miles and miles. When they could just pound it to dust mix some water in makes some molds and BOOM megalithic perfect right angles and designs.
It would be a strong proof finding occasional inclusions like pollen grains, seeds or wood fibers within the andesite.
And any traces of the molds? something like junction lines or imprints of the mold surface
Now the big question: Why did they stop using this method?
They are conquered by spanish people, all tradition are erradicated for his god
Because the information got lost. I believe ETs brought this information to Earth.
Maybe a global catastrophe that almost wiped the human race occured. and in times that texhnologies been forgotten.
Congratulations to Joseph Davidovits because in this video he demonstrates a beautiful example of Scientific deduction and proof. Along with his theories and his research findings at the Geopolymer Institute his body of work should deserve a nomination for a Nobel citation or prize since the development of his findings into commercial applicatiions will revolutionise the construction environment.
Listen, "making a video" is not how you make the scientific world accept your theories - You have your work published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal so your peers can independently verify your findings and come to a consensus - 3 years since you made this comment he still hasnt done that. Why? Because its utter nonsense and publishing his nonsense would make him a laughing stock - and by the way, they dont give nobel prizes for works of fiction
He is scientific and his theory has been published, peer reviewed and his practical demonstration of the geopolymer for Egyptian limestone blocks for example showed his theory was valid. Furthermore, his theory was, as is expected in scientific research, replicated and confirmed by another university recently. Before claiming this distinguished Professor, who I’m certain has higher academic credentials than yourself, is talking nonsense, so a bit of research and stop claiming you’re a fair minded skeptic.
Interesting. I concede your points. The problem is the weight of evidence. Archaeologists have huge amounts of evidence of quarrying. The tools have been found, the quarries are known, there are even pictorial and written descriptions of workers quarrying and transporting large stones. The evidence for the concrete theory just doesn't exist apart from this research. These structures are over 5000 years old, in that vast amount of time there have been countless repairs, alterations and other work done on the pyramids. A far simpler and more logical conclusion, is that the material that is being tested is probably from "modern" repairs. The main problem with the "poured blocks" theory, is the lack of uniformity in the blocks, it is well known that the blocks of the Giza pyramids are of irregular shape, which would lend itself to the idea that the stones were quarried and transported and then dressed and finished just before being put in place. These people were very smart and master builders, if they were smart enough to be making "concrete blocks" they would also be smart enough to realise making them all the same size and shape makes building with them vastly easier, and would simply make their moulds all the same size, and we would see uniformity in the blocks, just like modern bricks. This theory supposes that for every one of the blocks they wanted to make, they would have to measure the space, build a wooden mould just for that block, and once that was made they would disassemble the old mould and make a new different sized one. Honestly, does sound like the inefficient actions of builders capable of building the great pyramid?@@hayleyevans3580
The guy is like 80 years old. He stayed this is the starting point. Those younger can continue research in the proper direction. They give Nobel prizes to people like Barack Obama (who I admire) but hasn't published anything. Anyone familiar with this subject, who actually works with concrete and rock will understand the genius behind this man's approach.
Excellent conference. Thank you Prof. Joseph Davidovits. I also recommend his videos and studies on the stones of the pyramids of Egypt. Look for the documentary Ari Kat by Fernando Malkun also as a possible reconstruction of the technique of artificial stone in the building of the pyramids based on the work of Prof. Joseph Davidovits.
Thank you very much
Another question I have is if they had moulds, wouldn't they resort ofter to replicating the same shaped cast geopolymer stones and we would see more repetition?
It seems like the H blocks are identical.
@@nickidaisydandelion4044 no, they are all of a different measures. Not two are the same size.
@@langobard5546 They seem casted into a mold. But maybe when they came out of the cast they were still a bit fresh and the form moved.
Es un descubrimiento increíble!!! No puedo creer no tenga más difusión.... Finalmente un estudio serio sobre este increíble lugar.
So the geologists cracked it!, Ancient high technology theory (and separate Ancient Alien theories), mind blown? Simple farmers crushing rocks, transporting by Llamas and trading bird shit to mix concrete (geopolymer blocks), outstanding.
If it's geopolymer then why don't we see continuous platforms, why is it always blocks?
Limited Input material / reaction times
Professor Davidovits is the only man covering many fields of research of our past that I respect and support. He’s honest and is after the truth.
Much has been written about by Spanish Chroniclers. One half conquistador and the other, an Incan of royalty, Garcielaso de la Vega, wrote about the massive public works involved by tribute workers in constructing huge stone blocks by polishing and by application of lowered heat plus a red clay to ceramically finish a fascade on the Inca stone walls. Hulmut Tributch is the investigator in the video, "This is how they made the Inca stone walls" by Ancient Architects of 2019. Excellent download. The stone Masons observed that the miners of stones left pools of softened claylike softeners of stone and also watched Pito, the Andean woodpecker, soften rock clifts with beaksfulls of plants that softened stone, to make nests. The imagery in cylinder seals and bas reliefs in the Mediterranean suggests bird wings plus bags or purses. Speculatively, I suggest that the Masons observed the South American stone geopolymer builders and copied the origin story of a bird as wings and a bag as a break full of plants that softened stone.
Congratulations that is amazing and blows away so much confusion and mystery around the topic. There has been some progress elsewhere more recently but no one I know of has made a sample. That is the final step that proves the case.
I saw this on a video from Ancient Architects video channel on RUclips. That video reviews a paper by Helmut Tributsch for the SDRP Journal for Earth Sciences and Environmental Studies back in December 2017, titled ‘On the reddish, glittery mud the Inca used for perfecting their stone masonry’. That paper is based on eyewitness reports of Barnabè Cobo (1653) and Garcilaso de la Vega's writing in his 6th book . The idea is that acid from pyrite bacteria and or organic acid are used to dissolve silicate. He was focusing on the Peruvian stone wall and doesn't have nearly your experience or expertise.
Thank you Professor Davidovits for opening our eyes.
Brilliant study! there are many questions to answer yet but this is a really good start! thank you sooo much!
Stone softening is not the same as pouring some sort of mixture into a mold. It takes time and only works on a surface. If you really think about it, more softening would require more softener. So the thicker the softener, the more the softening. Now say one puts two stones together and wants them to fit together better, so they add a stone softener, the places that the stones touch would have the least amount of softener.
...They must have been VERY Good Mold Makers....
Obvious he has never seen concrete forms before.
to make a seperate mould for each stone kinds seems like lots of work making mounds
I have the same question
Moulds are made with wood, it ain't that difficult.
This the real explanation. I am native to this area. I know the lore and wisdom of my ancestors and keepers of knowledge. Brien does justice to all these🙏🌅. Here's the link. You are welcome ruclips.net/video/1fOYU-3wyyE/видео.html
Wow! I hope many more will visit and watch this video!
Ok,this explain some things..
But "stone of the pregnant woman" in Baalbek is still embedded with one side in the quary,so how this story of softening stone fit there?
Fascinating study! Is it possible to carbon-date the organic material found inside the rock? That might, once and for all, settle the question of when these monuments have been built.
Good question.
Next video mentions that.
The theory is interesting and surely it can be verified that, at that time, geopolymers could be manufactured but the scale and complexity of the manufacture of the blocks, makes it almost impossible that the original peoples could have carried it out. With what materials did they make the molds / formwork where to inject the geopolymer? The current construction with cement leaves the marks of the formwork on the surface, in this case there were none. They are my little doubts. Plausible but raises many questions
Unless they use smooth metal plate for the form work
Wood forms, just like today.
Erosion may have erased those marks.
Wood forms
it seems pretty sophisticated, not only the geopolymer but the design and details , like the small holes etc
Excellent analysis. Thank you for the great forensic work.
Much respect Joseph. You tackled a huge issue and explained it perfectly.
Can this complete process be demonstrated? And then can the building technique also be demonstrated? This could solved many other building mysteries around the world...fascinating...!!! Thank you!!!!
Absolutely fantastic presentation. Slam dunk in terms of conclusion, no reasonable person can argue otherwise. Need to get this out there!
How was the date of 600 to 900 AD reached for construction of Puma Punku?
Very exciting to hear appearance of geopolymers, very advanced techniques.
They found a diary owned by Sam the stone squasher saying we start the geopolymer pouring at Puma Punku today AD 600 at 9.30 am just after a hearty breakfast. 😀.
I’ve been pushing this guys work for years lol your Welcome Joseph ....
You have to be pretty inexperienced in life to fall for this nonsensical bullshit.
Have you dorks ever visited the site???
You can visit the fucking quarries and see where they were taken from.
You idiots should be ashamed of yourselves for either being dumb enough to believe this crap, or for trying to trick inexperienced people into believing it.
@Con you are bat guano
Graci
I been pushing his work also but you know if you post to many links on youtube their algorithms pick it up and it gets red-flagged as spam And the only people that see it as I'm told is the commenter and the video owner Moral to the story just post names and info but no links
anyone who has worked with concrete and forms is aware of honeycombing and bubbles left in the finish
even with the very large construction vibrators we still get this obvious detail also on big foundation block pours sometimes you get seepage on the bottom which is harmlessly left attached to the block and buried this detail is also seen on ancient megaliths ..I think a hell of a lot was poured then we are being told about...
Fantastic work, thank you !!!
Cast stone is an ancient science, Romans started to use it before AD 0.00. We have nowadays all kinds of cast stone, or cast in place using concrete, fake rock, brick, concrete blocks, terracotta blocks, brick veneer, etc. Positively south America ancient architects used the most common material by then, easy to pick up from old lake mines. I will not be surprised if 50,000 years in the future people will wonder about our precast storm sewer basins.
Have you ever looked into the serapeum of Saqqara? The granite boxed have these weird dents in them, as if they were once soft and something hit them, making an indentation. Now I'm not a rock expert, but it seems pretty weird that such a hard rock would act like that. They weigh about 100 tones each, and seems virtually impossible that people moved them in such close spaces. The boxes of Elephantine island are curious in the same way.
So many things we don't know about the ancient world. It seems the whole world was connected once, through some way we don't know yet.
Pangea
Outstanding information!
Professor Davidovits, So the volcanic andesite and red sandstone were already magnetized or were magnetized during the process of geopolymer concrete? If magnetized afterward maybe that would explain why compass goes in different directions when the compass is moved around the stones.
This is amazing! Please continue to update us!
Very good! Thanks for the share. I agree 100% when he says, "These studies should be done WITHOUT television Geologists" If you have ever seen an Ancient Aliens episode with that infumus Gringo Tour guide and his cohorts then you'll see the humor in that statement. Thank you for the laugh, very rarely do we get that kind of humor in the middle of something like this presentation, which is awesome!
What a fantastic presentation! Very well structured hypothesis!
Not to forget that the salt water for curing would also be right there. Fantastic work!
Nicht zu vergessen wäre, daß das Salzwasser zum Aushärten auch gleich vor Ort wäre. Fantastische Arbeit!
De plus en plus précis et scientifique Monsieur Joseph Davidovits. Merci pour ces explications assez détaillées. Mais comme d'habitude, c'est le désert en nombre de visiteurs, la vérité dérange. On ne peux pas le traiter de conspirationniste, alors on préfère ignorer cette vidéo. Moins de gens la regarde, moins elle ressort sur RUclips. Donc faut la faire suivre. Amitié, Stéph.
Thank you, this was really wonderful.
This the real explanation. I am native to this area. I know the lore and wisdom of my ancestors and keepers of knowledge. Brien does justice to all these🙏🌅. Here's the link. You are welcome ruclips.net/video/1fOYU-3wyyE/видео.html
How you are going to explain unfinished andesite blocks in quarry in Peru? Is it geopolymer too?
Excellent. Thank you very much.
Nice video. The video I have been waiting for since the previous video on artificial line stone blocks in Giza.
One question the double advocate would ask is - how may we explain the composition and proposition in these slabs matching those of real stone of nearest quarry?
Excellent research and presentation!👏👍
This the real explanation. I am native to this area. I know the lore and wisdom of my ancestors and keepers of knowledge. Brien does justice to all these🙏🌅. Here's the link. You are welcome ruclips.net/video/1fOYU-3wyyE/видео.html
C' est formidable. I'm very appreciate . Thank you Mr. David.
I still say that we may need to implement the use of a "Time Machine" to know for certain. I sincerely hope that we ultimately uncover some written or digramatical evidence that settles these questions once and for all. TNQ
This video: 2478 views. The latest mumble rap video: 2478 million views. This world's priorities.... More people need to watch this!
Excellent summary. I think this is the proper idea. It also explains the large stone in Cuzco which has always looked poured to me.
great and informative presentation. my only question and maybe I missed this part, if these artifacts were somehow molded, how and out of what were the molds made? if they only had access to stone tools how could they make something so smooth and with sharp angles? The mold theory makes sense but now let's find out it was done.
Man throughout the ages works things out eventually. This guy spent over 30 years to workout something we couldnt do or understand/comprehend how so called primitives could do something so advanced. respect.
Brilliant! Have been following your work for years, and appreciate you!
This the real explanation. I am native to this area. I know the lore and wisdom of my ancestors and keepers of knowledge. Brien does justice to all these🙏🌅. Here's the link. You are welcome ruclips.net/video/1fOYU-3wyyE/видео.html
I always had a feeling this technology was possible
Excellent job. The research shows the composition of the artifacts and the source of it, however, the main question remains. How do they reach almost perfect details wrt groves, holes, 90deg angles and complex inner shapes; molding doesn't seem to be the answer.
Really interesting, thanks a lot.
This is so important for our history.
Excellent. The Chemistry reactions are fantastic and invaluable. Congratulations.
Awesome!!! 🙌🏻
I watched the presentation to the end sitting on edge of my chair literally. This is a very precise presentation and great research. What I find very interesting is the finding of plastic polymer components because this technique was discovered in around 1930 or 1940 I'm not sure exactly when but not much earlier. How did the ancient Bolivian people know about this type of chemistry? To use acids from plant materials as binders also seems very advanced but to make plastic materials is on another level. Maybe there were ETs who brought this knowledge with them including the building block molds for making the cement because when I first saw the H formations I too thought those look like cement blocks from molds similar to modern construction blocks. So in Pumapunku that seems to be the case for sure. But in other places I saw exact cuts like laser cuts into gigantic stone walls which is another indication of ET technology together with the folklore tales from the past that angels came to Earth. I was also thinking that maybe advanced civilizations had evolved on Earth in the distant past on their own. But the tales from around the globe all seem to talk of the same events of UFOs landing and the people teaching the humans about higher technology. Another question I have is can the organic matter particles seen inside of the composite be carbon dated? Would be interesting to see how far they date back. Then the question arises are the carbon particles already part of the feldspar stones that were ground up or were they added by people in order to create the hardener material?
Amazing lecture
Since this is not stone, this can be carbon dated and a time of when this was made.
Anyone else see the dog's head on the slide at 37:50? its in the center of the slide and has the dog looking upwards at an angle. Just wondering if it just me that can see it or what.
The age of the stones presented is the mainstream accepted age. Was any carbon dating done on the stones, assuming it could be done because of the presence of organic material inside ? It is obvious that it was cast into molds. My question is, are the stones really 1400 year old ? If you've watched Graham Hancock or Brien Foerster talking about, for example Machu Pic'chu the newer work done by the Inca is far inferior to the megalithic blocks that they supposedly found and built upon. Which suggests an ancient lost civilization. And to repeat myself, has any carbon dating been done on the stones, if it is possible at all. Thank you.
I've been looking for a long time to have a clue like this. Mix with Santiago Agurto Calvo reference work on Construction Arquitectura y Planemiento Incas, put it to the test by building several wall types described in the book. And re-write a little piece of the history of ancients south american people. Great :)
Tremendous
EriksR tremendously Ludacris
What parameters were used to make the lab created specimen ? with what heat and what pressure ?
Any update on the carbon dating?
Man, I watch this and my theories about these cities finally feel validated. Thank you so much for all your research. As a stone masons kid this absolutely fascinates me.
Sensationell. Questions of a long life are solved. Thank you very much indeed
Fascinating, such an interesting watch.
I hope you can do the same test on those weird looking stones at Stonehenge.
and Peru, Japan, Africa...
Thank you. Can you do more research on other places? For example the temples in Baalbek, Libanon.
Excellent work Joseph.
Get this guy onto Joe Rogans podcast.
hey the IGNORANT fight and flee simple truths all the time ... yes Joe Rogan has played host to countless IGNORANT storytellers on his podcast
Joe can NOT tell the difference between bullshit and truth ... as promoted by storytellers like Graham Hancock and his brother in law Boo Boo Bauval
i.e. the work of Prof. Joseph Davidovits is in direct competition with storytellers like Robert Bauval and Graham Hancock and countless other 'pyramidiots'
at37.wordpress.com/2013/11/24/137-the-key-to-the-collective-unconscious-and-the-temple-of-man/
the work of Prof. Joseph Davidovits is stellar and lo and behold it meshes with an ever emergent idea that spans countless gene generations
This the real explanation. I am native to this area. I know the lore and wisdom of my ancestors and keepers of knowledge. Brien does justice to all these🙏🌅. Here's the link. You are welcome ruclips.net/video/1fOYU-3wyyE/видео.html
This approach using a softener and then a hardener to make cement structure. Does this approach use less energy?
11:48 The top and bottom left look exactly the same! 🤔 He's saying the bottom two look alike.?.
This the real explanation. I am native to this area. I know the lore and wisdom of my ancestors and keepers of knowledge. Brien does justice to all these🙏🌅. Here's the link. You are welcome ruclips.net/video/1fOYU-3wyyE/видео.html
It appears to me that the precision cuts of the megalithic stone may have been accomplished by Magnetism. Specifically using focused Dielectric fields to cut and shape the stones. If this is so then it explains the organic shaping and fitting we observe.
This might be the way it was done.
Stone #1 is set in place and stone two needs to be butted up to it with exact fitting.
Stone #2 is still in the rough and is placed close to stone 1 in which a scribe is used to trace, or follow, the contours of stone #1. The scribe has the Dielectric focusing mechanism on its opposite side which cuts stone #2 to the exact fit to stone #1.
Stone #3 is placed following the same technique as above. This whole process is continued for the entire structure.
The beveled edges of the stones appear to have been carved by a similar Dielectric focusing principle but this time the shape of the edge of the Dielectric cutting tool is constructed so that the field is small and is handheld. This is the simplest explanation I can come up with that explains the impressive fitting of the stones.
The more complex explanation is the Dielectric field device or mechanism. I have a sneaking suspicion that the Ancients knew the true nature of Magnetism and were able to exploit it. Nikolai Tesla undoubtably figured out how to use the Dielectric as a method of transferring electrostatic into a form of cutting tool. Due to the politics of the day of the combined giants such as Graham Bell, Marconi, Firestone and Wells Fargo, Tesla and his inventions were cast aside in favour of maintaining steady profit from the sale of electricity.
Tesla on the other hand was interested in inventing mechanisms based on Magnetism. He was a pure analytical scientist who figured out things by trial and error which gave him the knowledge of Magnetism from experience. It is because of this I believe he discovered how to direct the Dielectric fields into novel ways such as being used to cut and shape stone.
The scoop marks on the stones reinforce the idea that a Dielectric focusing tool may have been used.
Food for thought
Chasing Dragons
Very cool! 2 suggestions: (1) write an instruction manual for rammed earth buildings, and (2) this should be an Indiana Jones type movie.
How did they make the castings ?
Fascinating.
Is there any similar scientific evidence on dating Pumapunku site? Or where this certainty about the dating is coming from?
Absolutely amazing!
Amazing , Mystery Solved !
You reckon 🤔
Scientists call all of those structures temples but in reality those were just dwelling places for ETs. I'm glad to see that scientists discovered that those megaliths were made with stone amalgmation called stone polymers containing different stone materials as well as metals for extra strength and longevity.