Tap to unmute

The Genius of Computing with Light

Share
Embed

Comments • 948

  • @DrBenMiles
    @DrBenMiles 2 months ago +100

    I've wanted to do a video on these guys for literally 5 years. Let me know what your think!
    And check out shortform and get a FREE trial and $50 OFF the annual plan! at www.shortform.com/DrBen

    • @iceshadow487
      @iceshadow487 2 months ago +1

      When the two photons reach the end of the fiber optic cable and need to be separated again (transition from time to space separation) how is that done? How do they make sure the first photon goes through the delay circuit and the second, which has already been delayed, doesn't?

    • @memegazer
      @memegazer 2 months ago +1

      it is no secret that part of quantum computing will require some form of "time cloaking" computing
      Though I am loath to use the term "time cloaking" when all the tech really does is compute signal processing at binary oracle machine scale of "cloak" detection
      A true time cloak, to my view, should be able to obfuscate the detection of mass when encrypted with constants like the speed of light

    • @memegazer
      @memegazer 2 months ago +1

      btw...yes, the term "utility scale quantum" is not lost on me as not a proper use of quantum parallelization
      The term "quantum computing" seems a bit tortured in the context of signal processing that this "top secret" company is using

    • @memegazer
      @memegazer 2 months ago

      "This tech is kinda cool."
      yeah for sure, fermion condensate baby, pun intended, bc you can still dust for fingerprint conformity

    • @th3hom3slic32
      @th3hom3slic32 2 months ago +1

      Been wanting to ask for a while... what is the status for new rockstar scientist designs?

  • @hartjct
    @hartjct 2 months ago +322

    I’m blown away that a single photon can reliably be isolated and detected then gated for signaling. Props to the development team for their dedication and perseverance!! Truly amazing!

    • @Gam31n
      @Gam31n 2 months ago +1

      I mean the same can be done with other thingsz.,,

    • @Juttutin
      @Juttutin 2 months ago +20

      ​@Gam31n you may have missed the point of the video...

    • @hartjct
      @hartjct 2 months ago +9

      @JuttutinI thought I was so cool and on the cutting edge back in the late 90’s because I was installing OC-192’s with DWDM…we could combine Single-mode long range transceivers at 1550 & 1310 with multimode drops for private line/local data traffic. To see this quantum tech on fiber at this scale just makes my jaw drop….brings new meaning to single mode.

  • @Juttutin
    @Juttutin 2 months ago +1170

    This is beyond insane. How can one species be both capable of taming quantum randomness at the level of individual photons, and simultaneously incapable of agreeing that the earth isn't flat.

    • @teniishe
      @teniishe 2 months ago +94

      Bc theres 8 billion of us

    • @Rangerthelonewolf
      @Rangerthelonewolf 2 months ago +42

      There is a lot more stupid humans than non stupid humans. It’s that simple. Not every brain-body is created the same. Doesn’t mean that one person with less intelligence is anymore or less valuable than a person with high intelligence. Someone has to make chick-fil-a or Panera for the smart folks working 16hrs a day to contain and control quantum properties, because they won’t always make a lunch or coffee for themselves. Every roll/person/job has a place. What really matters, is purpose. A person waking up with and for a purpose. Not matter what that is.

    • @DLWELD
      @DLWELD 2 months ago +15

      There's a lot of space under both ends of the bell curve.

    • @Juttutin
      @Juttutin 2 months ago +5

      ​@DLWELDhighest σ of any human distribution.

    • @s4098429
      @s4098429 2 months ago +3

      Because we haven’t cured schizophrenia.

  • @minuzbecomez
    @minuzbecomez 2 months ago +379

    generally youtube would recommend this after 7months of release. Surprised I got this so early!!!

    • @appsenence9244
      @appsenence9244 2 months ago +2

      Ye same here. I don't understand why, but I'm happy!

    • @chipfixnorge
      @chipfixnorge 2 months ago +1

      Same here.

    • @baileyhollender2604
      @baileyhollender2604 2 months ago +1

      Just subscribe and you get the recommendation right away

    • @Secretlyanothername
      @Secretlyanothername 2 months ago +4

      I have no idea why I'm not getting this incredible video in 2027. What's wrong with RUclips???

    • @zafoquat
      @zafoquat 2 months ago +6

      My operating theory at this point is that the ads being sold for a video matching what ads you're a desired audience to is critical for content from subscriptions to show up in your feed timely or not. And when they show up days or weeks or months late its because they now have a desired overlap of ads that match what ads the algo wants you to see. I notice none of this when im on YT premium then bam its back when I dont pay for a year

  • @kalebbruwer
    @kalebbruwer Month ago +56

    "Instead of encoding in space, they encode in time"
    That's a fancy way to describe serialization

    • @synterr
      @synterr 3 days ago

      But here we have a serialization of probabilities ;)

  • @way-13
    @way-13 2 months ago +99

    To the RUclips algorithm, I want more videos like this

    • @PRO_RABBIT
      @PRO_RABBIT 15 days ago +1

      Same I also want videos like this

  • @jibcot8541
    @jibcot8541 2 months ago +109

    "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" - Arthur C. Clarke, 1962

    • @Isaacmantx
      @Isaacmantx Month ago +10

      In all reality, we are already there with electronics. The normal person has absolutely zero understanding of how these devices work. Most people can’t even explain the function of some of the most basic components.

    • @Hyranes
      @Hyranes Month ago +2

      ​Isaacmantx no need to call us dumb like that 😭

    • @arminqasimi215
      @arminqasimi215 Month ago +1

      my favorite quotation bro

  • @CChase-ki7cy
    @CChase-ki7cy 2 months ago +95

    Thank you so much for making complex subjects so easy to comprehend.

    • @DrBenMiles
      @DrBenMiles 2 months ago +13

      You're welcome! 🙏

    • @noctalis0560
      @noctalis0560 Month ago +2

      I wouldn't call that easy but yeah I have fish brain. You're awesome man.

  • @theniii
    @theniii 2 months ago +223

    meanwhile the whole economy is around making increasingly realistic videos of Will Smith eating pasta

    • @global-village-elder
      @global-village-elder 2 months ago +11

      Next we add cheese and a lot of pepper.

    • @chandaman95
      @chandaman95 2 months ago +2

      Quantum computing already has it's own smaller speculative market tbf.

    • @theniii
      @theniii 2 months ago +1

      @chandaman95 and how much of the us economy is based on it?

    • @ApostropheJustice
      @ApostropheJustice 2 months ago +2

      It's integral

    • @sypeiterra7613
      @sypeiterra7613 Month ago

      ​​​@theniiitoo much.
      edit: Tried looking up how much it's become a part of the economy and didn't get much useful data than "omg ai Is the next next thing so many people are using it (Forced to)!!!1!!1!!" but the amounts I've seen range from 1.5%~ to 35%~ depending on if you count how much is in the stock market of ai companies to how much money ai stuff in general has brought to the US total GDP which is the lower end estimates around 1.5%~ to 3.5%~ which means theres a whole flippin lot being handed around rapidly (between the same few companies) which is... making it look like they're making billions but its the same three dudes handing a 20$ bill in a circle to pay for each other's "product" which makes others outside of the circle jerk to invest into the bubble and it is unsustainable cause one day people are going to DEMAND a final product and once any of the three collapse it all collapses taking everyone involved with it except for the people at the top who leave with the bulk of the money outsiders had put into it

  • @iW3RK
    @iW3RK 2 months ago +37

    Wow!!! How does this ONLY have 95k views ?!?!?!?!!

    • @morganbailey89
      @morganbailey89 2 months ago +1

      Shadow band by nonsense....

    • @axandermorales
      @axandermorales Month ago

      Not everyone has the intellect to comprehend, nor the luck to come across this with all the noise in the world

  • @drlauch2256
    @drlauch2256 2 months ago +37

    I maybe only understood half of this Video but I'm still amazed at the small scale of single Photons they are operating at and trying to deciver anything from.

    • @DavidKD2050
      @DavidKD2050 2 months ago +1

      I don’t think, if I’m being honest, that I understood any of it. Too things amaze me. 1. That some people are smart enough to tackle such mind bogglingly complex issues. 2. That a bricklayer has a son-in-law (physics and engineering from Cambridge) who’s able to articulate such things to him.

    • @RedactedDeath
      @RedactedDeath 2 months ago +2

      Size of photons... Hehehe. Don't say that around my science teachers.
      Wouldn't it suck if our brains worked on both digital, analog, quantum at the same time while also using electrical, light, AND vibrations between it all.

    • @drlauch2256
      @drlauch2256 2 months ago

      ​@RedactedDeathWhy dont they have a size?

    • @angkhanh4993
      @angkhanh4993 Month ago

      ​@drlauch2256Uh...that guy didn't said photon have no size

  • @luke.perkin.online
    @luke.perkin.online 2 months ago +73

    Fantastic explainer, thank you Ben!

  • @sickofit1574
    @sickofit1574 Month ago +6

    The control of matter on the smallest scales that humans have achieved is more impressive than any magic from a fantasy book. Computer chips were already a miracle, this is just another level.

  • @Herrkfvran
    @Herrkfvran 2 months ago +25

    10:25 "We call this second photon the 'Sacrificial Photon'."
    (PR department hears this, has a panic attack.)
    "Or, after an emergency internal PR meeting, the 'Heralding Photon'." 🤣
    This reminds me of when the Cape of Storms was renamed the Cape of Good Hope.

  • @icls9129
    @icls9129 2 months ago +115

    Very cool to use the red photon detection to indirectly detect the useful blue photon.

    • @memegazer
      @memegazer 2 months ago

      Assuming stable within tolerance temperature conditions, which makes the method very expensive compared to classical computational scales
      I mean, it is interesting tech to be sure, but not exactly a full comprehensive machine code quantum computer that has sorted error correction for classic compute algos at a quantum scale
      I would say this is more like a decent assembly path to pursue

    • @peanutpete
      @peanutpete 2 months ago +4

      I figured they'd use the waste light.

    • @memegazer
      @memegazer 2 months ago

      @peanutpete
      assuming there is such a thing, they can only reclaim a bit of that in classical terms and it has more to do with processing speed than parrelized efficiency as a classical result

    • @absbi0000
      @absbi0000 2 months ago +5

      ⁠@peanutpetethey would not, because using the waste light would not necessarily signal that any photon was created

    • @GruffSillyGoat
      @GruffSillyGoat 2 months ago +4

      @memegazer - it does however also open up photonic computing at a rather large scale, not just quantum computing.
      One could see the technology approach used here to have a hybrid of photonic circuits (performing classical world computing, at very high speed, and lower energy requirement though) and quantum processing on the same system. The classical computing via photonics side could handle grunt work classic compute algos (at speed) whilst the quantum side can process problems (both pre-existing and novel) more adapt at solving using quantum computing.
      That way one gets a very fast classical computer (with a lower power budget), without having to waste quantum processing cycles on emulating processing of classic computer algos, with the addition of being able to process problems suited for the quantum domain in parallel, all within the same architecture (if not the same silicon die).

  • @Italianjedi7
    @Italianjedi7 2 months ago +36

    This gives me hope for the future of science.

    • @MinusMedley
      @MinusMedley 2 months ago +1

      Vaporware, can bet it's only another 30 years away.

    • @Italianjedi7
      @Italianjedi7 2 months ago +3

      @MinusMedleyReally?! Did you watch the video? It seems legit and promising. Much better than a lot of fusion and nuclear companies which are clearly bulls@t

    • @Gam31n
      @Gam31n 2 months ago +2

      tech stagnation dnt be 2 optimistic.,,

    • @Italianjedi7
      @Italianjedi7 2 months ago +2

      @Gam31nYou think technology and science is stagnating?

    • @Stockfish648
      @Stockfish648 2 months ago +1

      @MinusMedley
      Thoroughly stupid comment

  • @jackomayo
    @jackomayo Month ago +7

    That coffee setup tells me just how much funding they are getting.

  • @jakemeyer8188
    @jakemeyer8188 2 months ago +5

    I absolutely love that there's a computer that has a "world line" as part of it's design and construction.

  • @mrmivpushkin
    @mrmivpushkin 2 months ago +8

    As someone working with snspds for almost 10 years it’s cool to see that a big channel like this one discuss them!

  • @andrewcobb4392
    @andrewcobb4392 2 months ago +5

    Using light makes this so much easier to understand and your graphics.

  • @SaadOfficial-s2g
    @SaadOfficial-s2g 2 months ago +4

    They are secretly making the most innovative technology ever

  • @steve-o4d9p
    @steve-o4d9p 2 months ago +58

    The animation and explanation at 21:27 gives the impression that the purpose of repeating the experiment is to eliminate noise and that the most frequent result is the correct answer. While eliminating noise is part of it, it’s important to understand that in quantum computation the result is actually the probability distribution itself, so you would have to do this repetition even in a flawless system.

  • @Techmagus76
    @Techmagus76 2 months ago +10

    Cool to get such an insight into this and their actual state they are in.

  • @minuzbecomez
    @minuzbecomez 2 months ago +5

    15:00 I see MASTER YODAA!!!!

  • @peanutpete
    @peanutpete 2 months ago +1

    Imagine the future when cameras use single photon detectors in order to record everything that came in with no noise. Kids in 100 years are going to have such cool stuff.

  • @vetres3
    @vetres3 Month ago +3

    Blue and Red photons?
    Close enought, welcome hollow purple irl 😂

  • @hookbox666
    @hookbox666 Day ago +1

    Superb and captivating video! :)

  • @shahikulariyan7204
    @shahikulariyan7204 2 months ago +5

    thanks for sharing a amazing knoledge

  • @ovid1895
    @ovid1895 2 months ago +1

    it is genuinely impressive how well you explained what is essentially "magic".
    Well done, that is talent.
    Kudos to you and your team for the quality of content!

  • @alvarosantillana708
    @alvarosantillana708 2 months ago +3

    4 minutes of video and my mind just blow up. So fucking genious to use light as a source of computation at quantum level.

  • @deleted-something
    @deleted-something Month ago +1

    5 years of asking your classmates for one yes is pretty in line 😂

  • @DrMaddy101
    @DrMaddy101 2 months ago +4

    Enlightening 😊 what a cool technology!

  • @raizdesamauma8607
    @raizdesamauma8607 Month ago +1

    This is absolutely mind blowing! It really feels like actual magic, but it's even more absurd to know that it's in fact what a group of genius dedicated people can accomplish in ten years of hard work. Amazing video!

  • @happychappy2b252
    @happychappy2b252 2 months ago +3

    Very interesting, well explained as always. Thank you.

  • @marcoottina654
    @marcoottina654 Month ago

    The "time encoding", made to make the photons resilient to noise across chip-to-chip transportation, is truly genius! Congrats!

  • @Mrbeat-88
    @Mrbeat-88 2 months ago +1

    This is the milestone. Quantum is here now.

  • @nicholi6750
    @nicholi6750 2 months ago +2

    Quantum computing before GTA6

  • @michaelniederer2831
    @michaelniederer2831 Month ago +1

    Kudos! You've done such a great job explaining that I almost feel like I understand. Now I'm off to "explain it to my grandmother" to see if I do. Thanks.

  • @donmanolito1980
    @donmanolito1980 2 months ago +17

    I actually understood that and thats amazing that you could break down such an enormous complicated topic in an understandable way. Thanks so much! I wonder if some kind of cascading photon detector would be possible. Like a domino effect where the photon is triggering other photons until the cascade produce so much photons that its detectable by much easier measures.

    • @Bob-h4s2p
      @Bob-h4s2p 2 months ago

      You're forgetting how much trouble hey went to just to isolate a single photon...remember the goal is to compute at the 'edge' of the speed of light, to do that accurately very close to the speed of light requires discrete photons to ensure absolute coherence in your data stream.

  • @denbaro1472
    @denbaro1472 Month ago +1

    this is like watching asml in their early days of development. amazing work!!

  • @ricardodelzealandia6290
    @ricardodelzealandia6290 2 months ago +15

    Nicely explained. Wouldn't the generated photon pair be entangled themselves? Detecting one of them would affect the survivor, no, yes, no?

    • @rasmussaggi4656
      @rasmussaggi4656 2 months ago +1

      I would also love to hear the answer

    • @serloinz
      @serloinz 2 months ago +2

      i don't think destroying one destroys the other.. i think it's just the state connection is lost.. i could be wrong through

    • @luceafarul5740
      @luceafarul5740 2 months ago

      They would seem to be entangled but it might be that they are also entangled with third parties so detecting one doesn't collapse the wavefunction for the other

    • @redheadroadtrip
      @redheadroadtrip 2 months ago

      The original photon pair is surely entangled, but detecting one doesn't matter because nothing is happening to the photons before then. It’s only after the red photon is detected that the blue photon is moved to the area where it gets "split" into a new entangled state which then has calculations done to it.

    • @ai3t86
      @ai3t86 Month ago

      Yes, the photons are entangled. Detecting one confirms the presence of the other.

  • @ansontone3604
    @ansontone3604 2 months ago +1

    Fascinating that these guys have figured out the answers to so many complicated questions that they created. Bravo!!!

  • @stianweiseth5784
    @stianweiseth5784 2 months ago +8

    please tell me these guys know that in their hunt for Quantum computation, they have created/innovated the perfect component list for building light based inference chips? Like, are they cashing in yet? I want affordable RAM again.

    • @petergerdes1094
      @petergerdes1094 2 months ago +2

      I hear you but I don't think this helps much.
      1) Light is fundamentally linear (modulo some weird effects) and you need non-linear effects at each stage in your inference and training. That means you have to constantly read your light out redigitize it, apply your non-linear transform and then do the next matrix multiplication.
      This doesn't make it useless, many companies are betting big on it, but I strongly suspect that optimizing for doing quantum computation is very different than optimizing for doing large linear operations on huge numbers of inputs and reading out the results quickly and efficiently -- for instance these guys want single photons while the photonic accelerator folks want as many high quality photons as they can get for their energy budget.
      2) Well luckily there are quite a few companies doing the photonic accelerator thing. Unfortunately, light based inference doesn't really help with the RAM problem as it only does the computation efficenctly you still need to store all the data somewhere.
      Indeed it's probably even true that if you decrease the cost for compute you increase ram demands!

    • @stianweiseth5784
      @stianweiseth5784 2 months ago

      ​@petergerdes1094you load and hold the weights in RAM, in a photonic cascade you send the weights as pulse strenghts, since the trigger is solid, the only thing changing is the initial signal, I hashed it all out. It would definitely help with the RAM issue. Like, a lot.

    • @stianweiseth5784
      @stianweiseth5784 2 months ago

      ​@petergerdes1094the difference is that the architecture I have in mind doesn't read out the intermediary results during inference, only the final layer. The math is solid, and they have already done the heavy lifting to enable light-controlled gates. The weights are looped, so you can just spin up and partially read it from a loop of light which is the perfect lenght relative to the size of the relay. Sounds super complicated, and it is, but at the same time, it's just more and less pew pew, very much not rocketscience, and inference cost would plumet. Training is still super expensive, untill experimentally modulated inference variation for gradual self improvement puroposes post deployment is the norm.

  • @ReynaMirez
    @ReynaMirez 2 months ago +1

    so when are they gonna go public? Seems like prime time for getting public investors on board

  • @davidalearmonth
    @davidalearmonth 2 months ago +3

    15:07 Bachmann-Turner Overdrive

    • @GruffSillyGoat
      @GruffSillyGoat 2 months ago +1

      Very apt. With this computer one can literally describe it as "You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet".

  • @davidallyn1818
    @davidallyn1818 2 months ago +1

    Yes!! Finally a QC concept that feels like it could change the world. Others, while brilliant, don't seem very scalable to me - this one does!! Thanks for sharing Ben!

  • @minuzbecomez
    @minuzbecomez 2 months ago +3

    8:10 hmm... red+blue = ???

  • @CodaRyu
    @CodaRyu Month ago +1

    Crazy new stuff, amazing!

  • @almasysephirot4996
    @almasysephirot4996 2 months ago +3

    18:47 you didn't put a shadow in your animation under a photon, did you?

    • @kshrubb
      @kshrubb 2 months ago

      I think it's to clearly distinguish the paths they take

    • @hasanobtini8031
      @hasanobtini8031 2 months ago

      It's a misleading simplification, to actually show what is going on

  • @clint2295760
    @clint2295760 Month ago

    You had me at space to time converter circuit. I also work with horizontal flip flop bubble valves.

  • @Ikbeneengeit
    @Ikbeneengeit 2 months ago +6

    10:30 Isn't the heralding photon entangled with the blue clock photon and so detecting the heralding photon causes decoherence in the clock?

    • @dumbstupidfalk
      @dumbstupidfalk 2 months ago

      the entangled pair is used to produce a single photon then later they create the superposition of that single photon in that double pathway part, that's the qubit they are after.

    • @redheadroadtrip
      @redheadroadtrip 2 months ago

      At that stage of the process, it doesn’t matter that it decoheres: They're just getting a source of individual photons. It’s only after they have the individual photons that they split them and calculate with entangled states.

    • @ai3t86
      @ai3t86 Month ago

      Detecting the heralded photon won't cause decoherence. Only when you lose the heralded photon you lose information and the system becomes mixed

  • @sumoneskid
    @sumoneskid Month ago

    I have such respect for the creation of things that let us do things. From a bike to a car to a bridge, its fascinating to see challenges overcome. The difficulty of every step you've described is hard to fathom. Let alone bringing them together to function as a system. I find the physics of everything to do with EMR particularly difficult to understand. You've got a unique skill Ben, explaining these processes to us common folk. Thanks for the video. Eventually here, my head will stop spinning from what you've presented.

  • @jp34604
    @jp34604 2 months ago +5

    You never said how many qubits are on a chip? And how many chips are in a cabinet?

    • @luceafarul5740
      @luceafarul5740 2 months ago

      It's only one photon at a time so only one qubit. However, the computers fundamentally don't seem to work like normal quantum computers as they just directly extract the probability distribution by iterating the system a huge amount of time

    • @jp34604
      @jp34604 2 months ago

      ​@luceafarul5740
      That does not rule out the possibility of having many qubits on a single chip.
      All quantum systems have many
      Extra cores, so to speak for error correction

    • @jp34604
      @jp34604 Month ago

      ​@luceafarul5740
      That's not true. It is still potentially possible to have multiple qubits on a single-chip.

    • @luceafarul5740
      @luceafarul5740 Month ago

      ​@jp34604 they can have mutliple qubit if they have multiple photons at the same time that become entangled but what the video is showing/talking about is single qubit (or even qudits or however they are called when they are in a superposition of more than 2 states)

  • @lidarman2
    @lidarman2 2 months ago +2

    Interesting, There is a similar company here in Colorado called Quantinuum that is using light as well. One of my former colleagues is now working for them. We worked together using fiber optical components to perform coherent optical mixing using these techniques.

  • @LetMePickAUsernameAAAAAAAA

    10:30 How does the detector logic work downstream? presumably you wanna detect a photon in order to know that you have a clock signal on that line, but you only do the detection because you want to do something with that information (like open a gate or something), so how do you transmit a signal from that detector that is useful in any way when the blue photon is traveling at the speed of light, basically racing and being in front of the signal from the red photon ? Feels like even if you detect it, the blue photon already passed and you can't get "in front of it" no matter what you do (unless the wire of the blue photon has a longer path and loops back around to meet the end of the detector)
    28:20 again, how does the red photon detector transmit information faster than the speed of the blue photon which is basically travelling at the speed of light? How does the information from the detector react the switching circuit before the blue photon?

    • @jbeaudoin11
      @jbeaudoin11 Month ago

      Q1 it's obvious
      Q2 i think he said by using higher refractive material they are able to "slowdown" light enough to be able to activate the switch.
      To be honest, I'm sure none of what he's saying is actually how it works and it's super dumbdown by a lot to make it more simple and also not share too much public information.

  • @Larssonsson
    @Larssonsson Month ago

    thats a lot of energy to keep it THAT cool

  • @Budiiess
    @Budiiess 2 months ago +3

    For me this just seems like a normal bit computer running closer to speed of light then 70% c in our computer(copper wire)

    • @yungifez
      @yungifez 2 months ago

      Yeah, I don't understand how superposotion or entanglement would be achieved here

    • @smellystinker4837
      @smellystinker4837 Month ago

      ​@yungifezthe photon enters a superposition regarding which "path it takes" when they are split

    • @AmanGusainGhost
      @AmanGusainGhost Month ago

      ​@yungifezdifference is in the output variability. Normal bit computer can only output 0 and 1. But here, each curcuit/calculation can output and process probabilities between 0 and 1.

  • @quaestionarius7730
    @quaestionarius7730 2 months ago +2

    How long until encryption keys are broken?

    • @matrikater
      @matrikater 2 months ago +1

      the nsa already had a hardware backdoor for years now buddy 😅😢

    • @gooscifur5327
      @gooscifur5327 2 months ago

      Yesterday

  • @dannice240
    @dannice240 Month ago

    This is one of the coolest videos I’ve seen of yours. Well done.

  • @abhiabhi5432
    @abhiabhi5432 Month ago +2

    @DrBenMiles how are the paths switched at the other end of the tunnel to convert the time qubit to spatial qubit? there is no sacrificial photon here to actuate a detector that can trigger the BTO deflector. If we use signal from detector at source of tunnel, how does that electric signal travel so far in sync with the photons?
    So I don't understand how do they achieve the syncronization of the BTO deflectors at the two ends of the tunnel.

    • @00101001000000110011
      @00101001000000110011 Month ago

      watch the video again.
      on the end side of the transition line, the "half photon" split particle that was faster (since it wasn't delayed in a maze), is then delayed in an equal size maze, synchronizing the photon halves before being combined together.

  • @rexgamer8201
    @rexgamer8201 Month ago

    Great video and interesting logo for a company

  • @peters972
    @peters972 2 months ago +2

    I get that the qubits are being mass generated and transported, but how is one addressed and used to calculate something?

    • @panic-a-la-mode
      @panic-a-la-mode 2 months ago

      he mentioned logical gates like in a classical computer so performing operations using those gates is how it becomes useful

    • @peters972
      @peters972 2 months ago

      @panic-a-la-modethey work by persisting bits by toggling transistors. I’m not seeing how the qubits are persisted and then contribute to aggregate calculation. You need a “qubit resister”. That was not covered.

  • @4yDT
    @4yDT 2 months ago +3

    Just a follow up question: at 4:15 he states that light that we see from the cosmic microwave background still holds the same polarization as when the photons were created. How could you verify that? Because you can't possibly know their state before measuring them. Or is there just no way for the photons to change their state ?

    • @urisinger3412
      @urisinger3412 2 months ago +1

      I dont know

    • @Bob-h4s2p
      @Bob-h4s2p 2 months ago

      @urisinger3412 Ha ha, neither do I, LOL.

    • @panic-a-la-mode
      @panic-a-la-mode 2 months ago +1

      As far as knowing something before measuring, that's why models are useful. There's no verifying our predictions of the early universe. There are only degrees of certainty as we extrapolate from what we do know. We have created a story of the early universe that is consistent with everything that we do know. We try to understand the limits of our knowledge, which takes us only so far as moments after the big bang. Before that is a mystery and could likely remain a mystery forever.
      From what we have gathered, there wasn't much to change the character of light as it escaped billions of years ago. There were some things at play, but the greatest influence was the expansion of the universe. This did lower the light's energy state from infrared to microwave, but the last thing to affect polarization happened in the moment it was released.

  • @the_bulgi
    @the_bulgi 2 months ago

    Very great video thank you for going into such depths while still explaining it fairly simple very interesting.

  • @SteelBlueVision
    @SteelBlueVision 2 months ago +3

    16:51 People of science we meet once again at yet another kelvin faux pas!

    • @REM-4444
      @REM-4444 2 months ago

      I'm uninitiated. Teach me.

    • @Jediguil
      @Jediguil Month ago +1

      ​@REM-4444 I'm not a scientist so take this with a grain of salt, but afaik kelvin can't be measured in degrees like Celsius or Fahrenheit because a degree implies a step in an arbitrary scale (eg. 1°C being 1/100th of the temperature between the freezing and boiling points of water), and since kelvin is a unit of measurement based on the scientifically defined absolute zero and specific changes in thermal energy, the usage of "degrees" would be technically incorrect.

    • @REM-4444
      @REM-4444 Month ago

      @Jediguil ah, so it's just an issue of rounding or being imprecise. thanks!

    • @SteelBlueVision
      @SteelBlueVision Month ago

      @Jediguil 5 kelvins, not 5 degrees kelvin; kelvin has no "degrees," it is an absolute scale and the word degree by its very nature implies something relative or proportional to something else.

  • @fpskywalker
    @fpskywalker 2 months ago

    Really much enjoyed this video. Very cool stuff!

  • @CrystalProtogen
    @CrystalProtogen 2 months ago +7

    Posted 2 minutes ago, how am I so late

    • @sudo_softlock
      @sudo_softlock 2 months ago +1

      You're out of phase

    • @blindman2k
      @blindman2k 2 months ago

      Because your photons can’t see time.

    • @true1158
      @true1158 2 months ago

      @sudo_softlock -And you’re underrated 🫵

  • @rbyt2010
    @rbyt2010 2 months ago

    Nicely done.

  • @palashwaghmare7990
    @palashwaghmare7990 Month ago +5

    My jaw dropped at 26:00. Space to time quantum converter sir whatt?! The line between physics and magic is blurred beyond measurement...or is it ?!

  • @hakeemmiles7215
    @hakeemmiles7215 2 months ago

    Amazing content! Thank you for sharing 👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾

  • @Arihantrealitynothere
    @Arihantrealitynothere 2 months ago +6

    Good to see you are shedding light on such an underdiscussed topic

  • @ChamesyBoi
    @ChamesyBoi 2 months ago

    This is freaking awesome! I'm so ready for this.

  • @TheThehwashere
    @TheThehwashere 2 months ago +4

    Photon-based computing? it's an interesting concept

  • @Hailexx
    @Hailexx 2 months ago

    WOW, I feel so blessed to get this insight into the next step of computing!

  • @Graygeezer
    @Graygeezer 2 months ago +5

    There goes your encryption. All your passwords and secrets now belong to us!

    • @berrycade
      @berrycade Month ago

      Yes because the first people to get their hands on this technology will totally use it for stealing passwords rather than selling security to the richest people on earth.

    • @chairman_mao_Zedong
      @chairman_mao_Zedong Month ago

      Ah yes you can’t encrypt it at all /s. This is the dumbest take I’ve ever heard.

  • @pressureswitch
    @pressureswitch 2 months ago

    This is amazing!

  • @waynelynch1
    @waynelynch1 2 months ago +3

    It took the Brits! Well done lads. Btw, that was the best explanation of Quantum computing ever. Two wins for the Brits! 😀

  • @Jonc85
    @Jonc85 2 months ago

    Great content as always Dr.Miles:) thank you.🙏

  • @GP22855
    @GP22855 2 months ago +4

    new setup just dropped, we don't need GPUs or CPUs or whatever anymore, we only need light!

  • @diga4696
    @diga4696 2 months ago +1

    Thanks! Thanks to the editing, and explanations, this was really easy to understand :)

  • @debrainwasher
    @debrainwasher 2 months ago +2

    I'am just asking myself, why theses people have even considered to use such an archaic method like heat for the creation of a phase shift within their wave guides. Whoever has carefully followed the topological insulator topic, will easily recognize, these topological objects are made from Cooper pairs, while the large band-gaps are surface effects. Cooper pairs have the unique ability to flip between a bosonic and fermionic state upon a control signal according to the Landau-plane (temprature, current-density and magnetic flux density). When excited by a material-specific RF-signal at resonance and polarized by a DC electrical or magnetic field, theoretically a periodic violation of the unviolable Pauli's principle would take place. Since this principle holds and the energy of each excited electron can neither be destroyed nor converted into heat, nature fights back and creates extra space by "diluting" spacetime. Extra, or diluted spacetime within a confined piece of spacetime is termed spacetime curvature. And according to the direction of the curvature, it creates gravitational red-, or blue-shift. Therefore frequency and phase of photons, being in superposition can be exactly controlled, what could simplify the whole system.

    • @global-village-elder
      @global-village-elder 2 months ago

      No need to duck,

    • @debrainwasher
      @debrainwasher 2 months ago

      @global-village-elder Of course, there is a need to duck, because the described effect - every graduated engineer or physicist can replicate in a lab - and is contained within the accepted Lagrangian equation set of the accepted physical standard model, works on a microscopic quantum scale, up to large, multi-MW macroscopic proportions. Since there is a strong military and economic relevance, it took only one "wrong" term, reference, or person and the comment would go. This is the freedom of science.

  • @thirsty_dog1364
    @thirsty_dog1364 2 months ago +1

    This has the potential to turn everything upside down and a real endgame for computer development. Watch where you invest for sure.

  • @shnaslam
    @shnaslam 2 months ago +8

    INFORMATION IS (not) STORED IN THE BALLS (of individuated light particles but rather in the exact phase alignment between the superposed, spatially-encoded qubits and the discrete time bins the qubits are later converted into as time-encoded qubits.)

  • @piskac2781
    @piskac2781 2 months ago

    Bunch of cool stuff! Will it really at the end of the say do anything?

  • @jasonmurphy1302
    @jasonmurphy1302 2 months ago +1

    great video!

  • @Daehniksx1
    @Daehniksx1 2 months ago

    You are sending a photon but also now how another form of bit in that of the BTO. These guys have an amazing job. 🎉

  • @Gary-g7f
    @Gary-g7f 2 months ago

    Exceptional video, thank you so much!! Love it!!!

  • @P4nPuff
    @P4nPuff Month ago

    Wow, first you explained Majorana in a way I could understand (after two or three views) and now this. I feel like quantum computing expert 💪 Thanks, Ben!
    Btw. you explain things so much better then Veritasium and your jokes are superb 👌

  • @miettoisdev
    @miettoisdev Month ago

    amazing content my man

  • @StephenRayner
    @StephenRayner 2 months ago +1

    Wow! This is soooo cool.

  • @kennibal666
    @kennibal666 2 months ago

    Videos like this, much like the one on ASML's engineering, really highlight the true ingenuity of humanity. It’s awe-inspiring to watch, and I hope companies like these continue to succeed.

  • @mxblock
    @mxblock Month ago

    I'm in aw at these technologies and glad to be in the right time to maybe be working myself on them when working hard enough

  • @jayharris8939
    @jayharris8939 2 months ago

    I've always thought photon qbiys are the real future. But these guys have 3x level-upped the game. Thanks for the video and keep up the awesomeness.

  • @rondibiase2540
    @rondibiase2540 2 months ago

    outstanding topic and explanation. i recall reading a journal article about optical circuitry years ago and the many challenges faced. very nice to see how they problem solve.

  • @TheSadDuck
    @TheSadDuck 2 months ago +1

    Very bullish on photonics, thank you for the video. It is fantastic.

  • @Jemacaza
    @Jemacaza 2 months ago

    Amazing content. Thank you very much for exploring and explaining this. Very cool company!

  • @SirajFlorida
    @SirajFlorida 2 months ago

    Absolutely fantastic.

  • @shephusted2714
    @shephusted2714 2 months ago +1

    great reporting from somebody on the ground

  • @Interestingthings963
    @Interestingthings963 2 months ago

    Great video fantatstic thank you

  • @chronicalpsycho
    @chronicalpsycho Month ago +1

    Cant wait to have one of these in my pocket 😂