"... what parametrization does, that it tells us where all the points on the circle at some specific time t". sometimes such sentences are the thing needed to fill the gaps. And such sentences comes from someone who really understands the topic. Thank you!
Driving from London once, I noticed a police car getting interested in the magnitude of my position vector. So I slowed down naturally. Love you, Professor
@@DrTrefor You teach in a clear way that I love. I wish I had you as my Professor when I did that Engineering degree. You got me when you expressed speed as a position vector, made so much sense. Subbed!
So glad I'm studying physics in a time where there is so much high quality vids of kinda advance math. You're great! Thank you so much! Lots of appreciation from Tel aviv
Dr. Bazett, I often come to your videos thinking that I fully understand the topic, but inevitably during my viewing, you mention something that I hadn't considered. Thank you for presenting such wonderful and comprehensible mathematical insight. You're videos are gems!
Thank you! It is tricky for sure as my current videos are presuming a lot of multicariable calc stuff. If you ever get lost, feel free to comment and I can link the relevant prereq video hopefully👍
I hope you make money off of these videos because you deserve to. Thank you for all the help. You've helped me understand all my calc II - IV concepts, and I'm very grateful
The best explanation I've seen. I just failed my multivariable calculus course but your videos will be a valuable help during my next chance. Thank you!
I took vector calculus (Calc IV) in undergrad but my professor left off all the intuition/application and so most of the topics didn't make much practical sense. Really excited to go through this series!
Sir, I have seen many videos on advanced math but wow ,your videos make me feel it, incredible, and others leave me in half way of the course, u r a lifesaver , gonna watch all playlist.....
Short and concise, wonderful work! (As always). I'm starting to learn Diff. Geometry and this was helpful! Take care, love from Spain. PD: congrats on hitting the 100k, you deserve it :)
Awesome video, I love how quickly you brought together multiple topics I've been learning about in my Calculus 4 class. Thanks for such clear explanations!
Awesome video! Pls cover complete vector calculus soon. Ur explanation is very gud and makes these complex topics easily comprehensible for beginner students like me. Pls continue this series😃
3:27 the curve is one dimensional but it exists in a three dimensional space, just as the circle is also a one dimensional manifold in a two dimensional space. Thus the smallest number of parameters tells you the dimension.
Thank you so much, Dr. Bazett, for your incredible and in-depth teaching. I truly appreciate it! 🙏 Could you please recommend a textbook that aligns with this course?
"whereas the time parameter here is reflecting the specific choices for a specific particle on a specific path along this curve so which do you prefer" could you explain this statement more ?
How to parametrize a curve while maintaining dimensional accuracy. Like, say I want a curve that looks like the exponential curve but I want the curve to have dimensions of length L. What do I do? Do I do it like x(t) = se^t, and y = st?
@@DrTrefor yeah... but unfortunately i won't be able to give it some time... because nowadays im busy in teaching myself chemistry for board exam ... i have paused my coding also ...
7:41 ' doesnt depend on the specific path along the curve", but isnt this just the curve , since the curve defines the path? Or do you mean going along the curve at different speeds, which correspond to different time parameterizations of the curve (as opposed to *the* arclength parametrization, which has unit speed the whole way'
Sir! As equation of a circle is not a function in x and y variable or i can just in cartesian coordinates. but sir ,after parameterising that equation does it become a function or not?
Well yes, but not in the same sense. It is a function from [0,2pi] to a subset of R^2. So not the graph of a function from R to R like you might be imagining.
if position vector (r) represents the displacement, here in the curve(circle), r is normal to the curve. Similarly, if the derivative of r represents the velocity, here in the curve(circle) velocity is along the tangent to the curve. but displacement and velocity must be in same direction. Isn't it? I'm a bit confused over here...
It’s the difference between describing a road and describing a particular way that a car drives along the road, with for instance a velocity you can compute at each point.
A huge new discovery: the domain of time is defined in terms of 0 and Pi, there must be some intrinsic connections between the physical concept of time and this mathematical notation Pi.
OK.Hm, then what is the unit tangent vector (of any curve)? On the definition It (this unit for r (t), r'(t)=v) =: (vector)v (t)/v(t)/(magnitude and also (this unit for r(s);s-arclength= dr(s)(vector)/ds =((dx(s)/ds;dy(s)/ds;dz(s)/ds))and this =1 (on: ds=v(s)ds,then v(s)=ds/ds=1); /v(s)/=/v(t)/(the magnitude)-is it ok? I want t be sure! (I see a huge problem with the use of it or rather ignoring in the application to 4-d spacetime interval: the unit of (spacetime interval), or the unit of time parameter, esp. the unit of proper time- a huge mess in textbooks since....A.Einstein and P.Langevin's,AD 1911 lecture hoax! Again: the unit arc tangent vector and the unit of arclenght=1(or not?).It is just another geometric argument contra ...textbooks' idiocies (on "time dilation"'s interpretation.
in few minutes i discovered even on RUclips I am right (in Prof. Leonard's lecture); u missed in your lecture: dr(s)/d(s)=1. A proof of all 110 years of writings about "proper time" (definition, symbol)is a perfect BS without defining the unit of proper time and the unit arc tangent of spacetime interval/unit arclength!
Frame of reference and earth for example is not stationary and all thing on earth is never stationary except the heavy core at center of gravity of earth but when million of washing machine, billion of car wheel , and many GE large turbine keep disturbing earth center of gravity and so if we try not to control in hope for zero sum of randomness is easier to calibrate real earth vector and easier to track earth as a whole
"... what parametrization does, that it tells us where all the points on the circle at some specific time t". sometimes such sentences are the thing needed to fill the gaps. And such sentences comes from someone who really understands the topic. Thank you!
Driving from London once, I noticed a police car getting interested in the magnitude of my position vector. So I slowed down naturally. Love you, Professor
Ha!
@@DrTrefor You teach in a clear way that I love. I wish I had you as my Professor when I did that Engineering degree. You got me when you expressed speed as a position vector, made so much sense. Subbed!
@@NuclearPhysix Speed would be the *magnitude of the rate of change of your position vector*
So glad I'm studying physics in a time where there is so much high quality vids of kinda advance math. You're great! Thank you so much! Lots of appreciation from Tel aviv
You're most welcome! Glad to have some subs from Israel!
Me too
Mate I could agree more
@@DrTrefor you mean palastin!!
free palestine
Dr. Bazett, I often come to your videos thinking that I fully understand the topic, but inevitably during my viewing, you mention something that I hadn't considered. Thank you for presenting such wonderful and comprehensible mathematical insight. You're videos are gems!
Thank you! It is tricky for sure as my current videos are presuming a lot of multicariable calc stuff. If you ever get lost, feel free to comment and I can link the relevant prereq video hopefully👍
@Professor ~ ur video is so much visualising.
I hope you make money off of these videos because you deserve to. Thank you for all the help. You've helped me understand all my calc II - IV concepts, and I'm very grateful
The best explanation I've seen. I just failed my multivariable calculus course but your videos will be a valuable help during my next chance. Thank you!
Did you pass the second time around?
Same question?
I’ve never been more grateful to find someone on youtube. This is helping me out so much for my calc 3 final tomorrow! Thank you!!
Good luck!
Update
Thanks!
Thank you so much!
I took vector calculus (Calc IV) in undergrad but my professor left off all the intuition/application and so most of the topics didn't make much practical sense. Really excited to go through this series!
Omg, his enthusiasm and exciting is very inspiring and moves me to get deep into the topics of calculus, a true teacher and genius.
Really well explained. I especially like the intuition given and the graphics generated to support your teaching. Thanks !
The videos are great but listening to this guy lecture is eye opening.
Sir, I have seen many videos on advanced math but wow ,your videos make me feel it, incredible, and others leave me in half way of the course, u r a lifesaver , gonna watch all playlist.....
It's my pleasure:)
Short and concise, wonderful work! (As always). I'm starting to learn Diff. Geometry and this was helpful! Take care, love from Spain. PD: congrats on hitting the 100k, you deserve it :)
Thank you!!
Wow this was a lot more interesting and applicable than my lecturer. Thanks! You're amazing.
thanks so much for taking the time to make this playlist its super helpful for undergrad physics here in the uk :)))
Awesome video, I love how quickly you brought together multiple topics I've been learning about in my Calculus 4 class. Thanks for such clear explanations!
I'm taking vector analysis right now and am so excited at what I am learning from your videos. The conceptual explanations are very good.
Glad to hear that! Excited to see your comment when you get to the end:)
Extremely grateful for these lectures! Thank you sir!
Glad you like them!
thanks for making calculus so easy and fun to study.
Again thanks, man!. Whenever I wanna understand some topic of multivariable calculus you've made that topic video.:)
So glad it’s helping:)
finally found someone who teaches because he likes teaching, I should puy my tuition for you sir,
You are so good! This is proper teaching
Thank you __From India 🇮🇳
thanks sir This video helps me a lot....love from India❣️❣️
thanks this review is helping as a prerequisite for tensor calculus!
Amazing Explanations Professor Love from India Thank you
Awesome video! Pls cover complete vector calculus soon. Ur explanation is very gud and makes these complex topics easily comprehensible for beginner students like me. Pls continue this series😃
Thank you! The vector calculus series is coming out 3 days a week and will be done in about one more month:)
I have always enjoyed watching your videos. Thanks for math more enjoyable.
perfect playlist. Thank you!
Thank you Dr.
From Saudi
Wish I had you as my professor!
Love how we get a breakdown of why police care more about the rate of change of your position vector as opposed to your arc length parameterization.
3:27 the curve is one dimensional but it exists in a three dimensional space, just as the circle is also a one dimensional manifold in a two dimensional space. Thus the smallest number of parameters tells you the dimension.
Need an online course from u
Beautifully explained🤟
Ma sha Allah extraordinary way of teaching 👍🏿
Thank you very much sir 🔥🔥🔥
Thank you! So excited for these vids 😊
Glad you like them!
@@DrTrefor they're excellent 😁
Nice breakdowns.
Thank you so much, Dr. Bazett, for your incredible and in-depth teaching. I truly appreciate it! 🙏 Could you please recommend a textbook that aligns with this course?
Aahhhh, here is the explanation of parameterization, found it,hashhh. Thanks professor
Very helpful explanation!!!
Glad it helped!
Taking Calc 3 in Spring! Pretty excited for it. 😄
Nice! You're going to love it, multivariable is so much cooler than single variable imo
How is it going so far? It's fun for me!
your videos are great.
Thank you so much for these fantastic videos!
Very good quality channel
Thx!
Thank you!
love from iit bombay
thank you for this, now i finally get it
thank you
There is actually a rational parametrization for the equation x^2+y^2= 1 it is [(1-t^2)/(1+t^2), 2t/(1+t^2)]
Marvelous💯💯
Step 1: Read textbook and put formulas into Anki.
Step 2: Watch Dr. Trefor Bazett
Step 3: Practice
Step 4: Ace test
Lol awesome
"whereas the time parameter here is reflecting the specific choices for a specific particle on a specific path along this curve so which do you prefer" could you explain this statement more ?
Hi Dr Bazett, which textbook should i use in order to follow this playlist?
How to parametrize a curve while maintaining dimensional accuracy. Like, say I want a curve that looks like the exponential curve but I want the curve to have dimensions of length L. What do I do? Do I do it like x(t) = se^t, and y = st?
Can you bring special course on Vector calculus.
I have a whole playlist on this!
Sir do you have any extra courses on calculus that you have done for even more understanding and questions...?
cool...
vector calculus❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Love vector calc so much:D
@@DrTrefor
yeah...
but unfortunately i won't be able to give it some time... because nowadays im busy in teaching myself chemistry for board exam ...
i have paused my coding also ...
Haha yup have to pass the exams first:D
7:41 ' doesnt depend on the specific path along the curve", but isnt this just the curve , since the curve defines the path?
Or do you mean going along the curve at different speeds, which correspond to different time parameterizations of the curve (as opposed to *the* arclength parametrization, which has unit speed the whole way'
It's like a highway. The highway is fixed. How you drive down the highway, faster or slower, doesn't change anything.
What is your choice of textbook for MV and Vector Calculus?
The "standard" full service calc books are Thomas and Stewart, both are fine
Awosome 😀❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Sir! As equation of a circle is not a function in x and y variable or i can just in cartesian coordinates. but sir ,after parameterising that equation does it become a function or not?
Well yes, but not in the same sense. It is a function from [0,2pi] to a subset of R^2. So not the graph of a function from R to R like you might be imagining.
@@DrTrefor thank you sir.
Awosome...I want to know history of vector calculus and its relation with physics. particularly (flux,curl,circulation)
We're definitely going to have a lot of connections to physics, particularly a bit later in the series:)
@@DrTrefor Is this any book present these conceptions with historical approach?
Dr. Bazett can you help me?
How to parametrize a circle in 3D space from three points?
if position vector (r) represents the displacement, here in the curve(circle), r is normal to the curve. Similarly, if the derivative of r represents the velocity, here in the curve(circle) velocity is along the tangent to the curve. but displacement and velocity must be in same direction. Isn't it? I'm a bit confused over here...
Which book you are following for this course??
Thomas calculus
講得很好ㄟ 哥 謝謝你 我的超人
Can someone explain, why the r(t) is described using cos(t) i + sin(t) j ? Why not using the circle formula x² + y² = radius instead?
It’s the difference between describing a road and describing a particular way that a car drives along the road, with for instance a velocity you can compute at each point.
Please recommend me a book to learn vector calculus basics
A huge new discovery: the domain of time is defined in terms of 0 and Pi, there must be some intrinsic connections between the physical concept of time and this mathematical notation Pi.
OK.Hm, then what is the unit tangent vector (of any curve)? On the definition It (this unit for r (t), r'(t)=v) =: (vector)v (t)/v(t)/(magnitude and also (this unit for r(s);s-arclength= dr(s)(vector)/ds =((dx(s)/ds;dy(s)/ds;dz(s)/ds))and this =1 (on: ds=v(s)ds,then v(s)=ds/ds=1); /v(s)/=/v(t)/(the magnitude)-is it ok? I want t be sure! (I see a huge problem with the use of it or rather ignoring in the application to 4-d spacetime interval: the unit of (spacetime interval), or the unit of time parameter, esp. the unit of proper time- a huge mess in textbooks since....A.Einstein and P.Langevin's,AD 1911 lecture hoax! Again: the unit arc tangent vector and the unit of arclenght=1(or not?).It is just another geometric argument contra ...textbooks' idiocies (on "time dilation"'s interpretation.
in few minutes i discovered even on RUclips I am right (in Prof. Leonard's lecture); u missed in your lecture: dr(s)/d(s)=1. A proof of all 110 years of writings about "proper time" (definition, symbol)is a perfect BS without defining the unit of proper time and the unit arc tangent of spacetime interval/unit arclength!
GOAT
love the video, audio a bit crucnhy prob the mic
4:22
i cant thank you enough...
you're most welcome!
Sir !
I am not getting it can you please help me
I am in hot water right now
no kappa, explanation slapped
7:10 min What is the "ass?"
0:00 Holy shit, you look like the Omniman!
Vectors exam in a week. Let’s go B)
430 likes and not ONE DISLIKE?!?!
That's actually a pretty sick ratio
@@DrTrefor so sick that math breaks for it🤯
I've never seen a video with such an impressive like/dislike ratio and I can see why.
That actually is pretty crazy. If anyone ever dislikes this, I’m mad at you lol
@@DrTrefor Well my good Doctor, may it remain forever untainted.
i love you
Frame of reference and earth for example is not stationary and all thing on earth is never stationary except the heavy core at center of gravity of earth but when million of washing machine, billion of car wheel , and many GE large turbine keep disturbing earth center of gravity and so if we try not to control in hope for zero sum of randomness is easier to calibrate real earth vector and easier to track earth as a whole
outstanding sir , but if possible speak a bit slow......