Please read the 14th amendment. "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
@@mekaihThe Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution was adopted on July 9, 1868, as one of the Reconstruction Amendments. Usually considered one of the most consequential amendments, it addresses citizenship rights and equal protection under the law and was proposed in response to issues related to formerly enslaved Americans following the American Civil War. The amendment was bitterly contested, particularly by the states of the defeated Confederacy, which were forced to ratify it in order to regain representation in Congress.
@@mekaih cool so if we invited 10000 Russian couples where the female was about to give birth in the next two months, a 3 month holiday in the US, you would have no problem with those 10,000 Russian babies born while here being US citizens? Regardless what you type as an answer .. we already know from your hateful Russia rhetoric you wouldn't allow it. Russia was just an example ... they could be North Korean, Syrian Assad supporters ... just pick any country you start foaming at the mouth talking about and I guarantee your response will be completely different.
I already pointed out the birthright citizenship was being abused and needs to be carefully revised. By forcing this issue to end up in the courts, it will come out with logical limitations which make good sense!!
I tell people you see this down in South Florida big time . They call them Anchor babies . I worked at a shelter in Miami and this is a known think for the women to have babies because they will stay . So they target American men . It’s Fraud no-matter how we want to paint it .
Why do the people who say that the first and second amendments, with their nuanced language, are absolute, now turn around and say that the 14th, with its plain and easy to read language, is not?
@@VirgilHathaway-zj3xq You are manufacturing nuance where none exists. Explain the nuance in the words "All persons born" that extends their meaning to include the parents of said persons. The 14th is intentional in its silence on parentage. It operates only on the "persons born or naturalized" without regard to any other persons. It was kind of the point. Every argument that starts with the status of parents is invalid in its face. Even the example of children born of diplomats has nothing to do with parental lineage. They cannot become citizens because they, on their own, as individuals, are not subject to the jurisdiction of the US by operation of treaty. It has nothing to do with any imaginary constructs around parental lineage.
@@VirgilHathaway-zj3xq I guess if the constitution said those words as you typed them you would be right. However, it doesn't, and you aren't. "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State..." In so far as there are no specifics defining the words "well regulated" or specifically attaching the implied membership in that militia to the right defined, the second amendment has nuance that is entirely absent in the clear and plain language of the 14th. "All persons born", and "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" are clear and unambiguous terms. You have to use your imagination to arrive at an interpretation that removes a right from a child by virtue of their parentage. The children being born are individuals. Their parents don't exist in the 14th amendment, or in this conversation.
Well they can have the baby here, sure, but by the Constitution their children won't be US Citizens, UNLESS, the father is a US Citizen! We need to go back and rescind a bunch of the ones that came here illegally and committed a felony! I bet you that could pass after this goes through!
Not only do their children becomes Citizen's, in which the Mother automatically Becomes a Citizen. Then they can bring the rest of the Family. Like their Uncles, Aunts, Cousin's, Grand Parents. Which becomes a Large Chain of Relatives who becoming Citizen's also.
We have the same issue here in Canada, birth tourism taking toll on our healthcare system. I read an article the local mom had to drive almost an hour away to get to a different hospital since there were so many Chinese women giving birth in Richmond, BC where she lives!
Legal immigrants spend years and lots of money to come to the USA. In addition, stringent financial documentation, police records are reviewed as well.
If an American couple was visiting Italy, and the wife being pregnant gave birth while on vacation there, their child does not automatically become an Italian Citizen. The child becomes a Citizen of the Country of origin of it's parents. Citizenship in another Country must be applied for and granted only upon completion of the terms and conditions required. The 14th Amendment does not apply to children born of illegal immigrants because they are not subject to the jurisdiction thereof. As an illegal migrant, you have no expectation of rights or liberties that are only afforded to US Citizens. There is no such thing as Birth Right Citizenship for undocumented persons in the Constitution.
Please read the 14th amendment. "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
So what are you replacing it with to determine if someone is going to be a citizen who is born here in the future? Why don't we just do this retroactively to the beginning of our nation?
So, prior to 1776, got it...wouldn't bother Myself, My family OR My significant other. Can't really do it prior to that because there was no nation and as a result no enforceable laws, "on the books", by which to refer or render judgement.
Where is your family from? Unless you are Native American or your family was here before the creation of the United States, birthright citizenship is a fundamental part of your family’s history. It’s the reason you are here today as an American. Never forget that your ancestors, whether they came seeking freedom, opportunity, or refuge, were granted the right to build a future for themselves and their descendants through the principles of equality and inclusion. Birthright citizenship embodies those values-it’s not just a legal framework, but a recognition of the shared humanity and dignity of everyone born on this land. It’s what allowed generations to come together and make this country what it is today. Never let anyone take that away.
If this would of been in placed, we wouldn't have been burdened with Kamala. Neither parent was a naturalized citizen. The mother's student visa had expired too.
On June 16, 1866, the House Joint Resolution proposing the 14th Amendment to the Constitution was submitted to the states. On July 28, 1868, the 14th amendment was declared, in a certificate of the Secretary of State, ratified by the necessary 28 of the 37 States, and became part of the supreme law of the land.
Please read the 14th amendment. "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
You are not “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” if your parents are subject to the jurisdiction of another country. That’s the basis for extradition.
@@danielholtxxl4936 I understand your word play here, but you're rewriting the constitution and that's of the highest offense. Very plainly it says, All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. Doesn't mention parents, slaves, illegals, or anything it literally just says all persons born here. You cannot get clearer than this. This is the constitution of the United States of America, if you don't like it then there are ways to amend the constitution. You need a proposed amendment to be passed by two-thirds of both houses of Congress, then ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states.
@@tinab1317 the constitution. . Please educate yourself, All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
@ you can recite the text till you are blue in the face but that’s not what President Trump is asserting. He is saying that he doesn’t recognize illegals as his citizens and they aren’t entitled to his protection nor constitutional rights.
Use nothing, those shortcuts were used in the past to built nations with few inhabitants. It doesn't make sense in a world with 8 billions individuals.
Impossible.....No justification exists. However, in reality its a scam for free money and easy citizenship....Then scam the system for every penny they can though BS programs...You never have to work, just play a good refugee victim and get shit handed to you on the taxpayer dime.
Birthright was intended for the freed slaves and their children following the end of the Civil War, but like so many laws that judges and lawyers start interpreting true meanings get twisted and abused. It will soon be back in the courts and I expect the main point to debate is no matter how you look at it it was never intended to be used by anyone in the USA illegally as they are undeniably criminals.
Because it's constitutional and has been a basic right to anyone born on US soil in the past 200 years... I'd even dare to say that it's common sense that anyone born on a country's land is automatically a citizen! After the baby is born, the family can go back to their native country. Once the child is of age, they have every right to go to their birth country and exercise their rights!
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." The 14th amendment was implemented for the protection of freed slaves, not visitors who had anchor babies. The Civil Rights Act of 1866 declared: "... all persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States." You can't illegally come here as a citizen of another country and have a baby who's automatically a citizen. Period. Good grief.
Has to be a way of secure email , cell , voip , or some other tech way to have a secure vote.. 1 citizen , 1 vote ..secure , tallied up fast .. THEN all citizens could get in on votijng for EVERYTHING about our govt..
Nobody asked for this. Everyone has been asking for term limits. What happened? Recency bias? Where's the tariffs? Where's the peace making in Russia? Empty promises and "concepts of a plan"
@@clydedenby1436 day 1 he would end the war. That's what we voted for. He literally said on Day 1. Prices still high. Wars still going. And now he's talking about vanity projects that were not even talked about then. You were sold a lie.
Where is your family from? Unless you are Native American or your family was here before the creation of the United States, birthright citizenship is a fundamental part of your family’s history. It’s the reason you are here today as an American. Never forget that your ancestors, whether they came seeking freedom, opportunity, or refuge, were granted the right to build a future for themselves and their descendants through the principles of equality and inclusion. Birthright citizenship embodies those values-it’s not just a legal framework, but a recognition of the shared humanity and dignity of everyone born on this land. It’s what allowed generations to come together and make this country what it is today. Never let anyone take that away.
I have always argued that, two people who are not citizens of the U.S. and having a child on U.S. soil does not make the child a citizen. Many people do so on purpose for all the benefits of this country. Look at that guy bragging on the internet, that that best thing was having a baby here, and all the monetary benefits of living off of his child's benefits, that father was laughing his ass off on social media at how stupid U.S. laws are.
Agreed, and kamala Harris should not have qualified as a naturalized US citizen. She would have been unqualified to run as president. Fortunately, losing the election sidestepped the issue.
Stupid is as stupid says. We should debate and amend sections in the Constitution Trump dislikes but keep the ones he likes. Great logic. Why don't we debate the 2nd amendment?
As I said to everybody that thinks this is a loser when they bring up the 14th Amendment, show me ONE law that a newborn baby can be charged with? That is the simplest way to point out it's absurdity!
After this birthright citizenship loophole is closed, make sure temporary non-citizens do not get to adopt citizen orphans; because they will use that 200% to get citizenship.
Where is your family from? Unless you are Native American or your family was here before the creation of the United States, birthright citizenship is a fundamental part of your family’s history. It’s the reason you are here today as an American. Never forget that your ancestors, whether they came seeking freedom, opportunity, or refuge, were granted the right to build a future for themselves and their descendants through the principles of equality and inclusion. Birthright citizenship embodies those values-it’s not just a legal framework, but a recognition of the shared humanity and dignity of everyone born on this land. It’s what allowed generations to come together and make this country what it is today. Never let anyone take that away.
you do not understand what Birthright citizenship is or why the 14th amendment was adopted. birthright citizenship has NOTHING to do with my families history. the 14th amendment was solely directed at freed slaves. making everyone who was born here a citizen. it got bastardized much later and we will be paying the price for that until the end of time. it needs to be stopped now
This part “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” is conveniently ignored and this is what the Supreme Court has to resolve and make it clear that children born here of illegal parents or those on tourist visas should not be entitled to birthright citizenship.
Birthright by Soil vs Birthright by Blood. In the case of an illegal the child would instantly become a dual citizen, one of origin of the parents and one of the soil they birthed. Birth tourism is the process of creating an anchor baby who will eventually sponsor other family members to immigrate. But how do you expel the non-citizen parents if the child has a birthright of soil.
I don't understand the issue. Here in So Cal, many years ago, there were many Chinese birthing houses. California actually went after these parents and shut down many of these birthing houses. No one complained like they are doing today. Where I live, you would always see pregnant Chinese women walking from apartments to the shopping areas. Today, you hardly see any.
No non-US pregnant person should be allowed into the US until the law is changed to say that giving birth in the united states by an alien citizen does not automatically confer citizenship on the offspring..
If illegal immigrants are not subject to the jurisdiction that means they can not be held liable for breaking the laws since the jurisdiction laws won’t apply to them….is that what you want?
@tinab1317 you're under the jurisdiction of Jamaica,because you have to obey their laws and if you commit a crime,you're subject to their jurisdiction, which means you can go tk jail their When you leave Jamaixa,and return to the US,you are no longer subject to their jurisdiction
Abuse?! Nope. Trump flipped the switch. This is a topic that has long needed to be slugged out in court. Neither House or Senate would be virtue signaling about a bill if Trump hadn't beat the hornet's nest. It was 💯 the right move.
No, the problem here is this is another aspect of the Constitution that our resident Communists willfully abuse. Its going to court. We will see what happens there. The 14th amendment was never intended to be a rubber stamp for party crashers.
Let's look at what is really happening here, I will say it right here; Anchor baby is a term (regarded by some as a pejorative used to refer to a child born to non-citizen parents in a country that has birthright citizenship which will therefore help the parents and other family members gain legal residency or avoid deportation. In the U.S., the term is generally used as a derogatory reference to the supposed role of the child, who automatically qualifies as an American citizen under jus soli and the rights guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Do they not know they are abusing that 14th amendment, they come here illegally get themselves pregnant to have that anchor baby, they are not doing it just to have a child they are doing it for what is said above. Then you also have the ones who are already pregnant coming over the border illegally and then having that child on US soil as an anchor to get to stay here. Even if these judges know this they do not care and that is because of the 14th amendment, no matter if you're abusing the system if it's in the constitution it is set in stone no matter what.
The Constitution doesn't need to be changed, it needs to be enforced. If an American couple was visiting Italy, and the wife being pregnant gave birth while on vacation there, their child does not automatically become an Italian Citizen. The child becomes a Citizen of the Country of origin of it's parents. Citizenship in another Country must be applied for and granted only upon completion of the terms and conditions required. The 14th Amendment does not apply to children born of illegal immigrants because they are not subject to the jurisdiction thereof. As an illegal migrant, you have no expectation of rights or liberties that are only afforded to US Citizens. There is no such thing as Birth Right Citizenship for undocumented persons in the Constitution.
There are many ways to be in our Country legally without Citizenship. For instance: A Green Card for employment, a Visa to attend Educational Institutions, a Visa for Travel and Vacation, a Visa to start a Company etc... All of which can be a starting point to Naturalization through the proper channels.
You realise you can just invest in the country and get citizenship? Like most other countries. Money talks, and no country is under obligation to take on people needing welfare under their wing
This should have been dealt with decades ago.
Yes everyone's else is benefiting but the American citizens
agenda 2030
global socialism
brought to you but the united socialist nations
Please read the 14th amendment. "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
@@mekaihThe Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution was adopted on July 9, 1868, as one of the Reconstruction Amendments. Usually considered one of the most consequential amendments, it addresses citizenship rights and equal protection under the law and was proposed in response to issues related to formerly enslaved Americans following the American Civil War. The amendment was bitterly contested, particularly by the states of the defeated Confederacy, which were forced to ratify it in order to regain representation in Congress.
@@Lone.Wolf1976Correct!😊
@@mekaih cool so if we invited 10000 Russian couples where the female was about to give birth in the next two months, a 3 month holiday in the US, you would have no problem with those 10,000 Russian babies born while here being US citizens?
Regardless what you type as an answer .. we already know from your hateful Russia rhetoric you wouldn't allow it.
Russia was just an example ... they could be North Korean, Syrian Assad supporters ... just pick any country you start foaming at the mouth talking about and I guarantee your response will be completely different.
I already pointed out the birthright citizenship was being abused and needs to be carefully revised. By forcing this issue to end up in the courts, it will come out with logical limitations which make good sense!!
I think that's the problem.. there doesn't seem to be any limitations, and so like many other government policies and programs, it is being abused.
@@CharlieHorse-q9b I agree. Like the second amendment. It is being abused and needs to be revised with limits that make good sense.
I tell people you see this down in South Florida big time . They call them Anchor babies . I worked at a shelter in Miami and this is a known think for the women to have babies because they will stay . So they target American men . It’s Fraud no-matter how we want to paint it .
Why do the people that say birthright citizenship is absolute but the 1st and 2nd amendment are not?
Why do the people who say that the first and second amendments, with their nuanced language, are absolute, now turn around and say that the 14th, with its plain and easy to read language, is not?
@ you’re not reading the nuanced language in the 14th
@@VirgilHathaway-zj3xq You are manufacturing nuance where none exists. Explain the nuance in the words "All persons born" that extends their meaning to include the parents of said persons. The 14th is intentional in its silence on parentage. It operates only on the "persons born or naturalized" without regard to any other persons. It was kind of the point. Every argument that starts with the status of parents is invalid in its face. Even the example of children born of diplomats has nothing to do with parental lineage. They cannot become citizens because they, on their own, as individuals, are not subject to the jurisdiction of the US by operation of treaty. It has nothing to do with any imaginary constructs around parental lineage.
@ subject to the jurisdiction thereof, sounds just as nuance as in order to maintain a well maintained militia, to me.
@@VirgilHathaway-zj3xq I guess if the constitution said those words as you typed them you would be right. However, it doesn't, and you aren't. "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State..." In so far as there are no specifics defining the words "well regulated" or specifically attaching the implied membership in that militia to the right defined, the second amendment has nuance that is entirely absent in the clear and plain language of the 14th. "All persons born", and "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" are clear and unambiguous terms. You have to use your imagination to arrive at an interpretation that removes a right from a child by virtue of their parentage. The children being born are individuals. Their parents don't exist in the 14th amendment, or in this conversation.
Saudi women who are close to a due date will come here and stay in a hospital and wait so they can clam their kid is a citizen. How can that be legal?
Well they can have the baby here, sure, but by the Constitution their children won't be US Citizens, UNLESS, the father is a US Citizen! We need to go back and rescind a bunch of the ones that came here illegally and committed a felony! I bet you that could pass after this goes through!
It should not!
Not only do their children becomes Citizen's, in which the Mother automatically Becomes a Citizen. Then they can bring the rest of the Family. Like their Uncles, Aunts, Cousin's, Grand Parents. Which becomes a Large Chain of Relatives who becoming Citizen's also.
Not how it works.
Anchor babies
We have the same issue here in Canada, birth tourism taking toll on our healthcare system. I read an article the local mom had to drive almost an hour away to get to a different hospital since there were so many Chinese women giving birth in Richmond, BC where she lives!
Are Chinese not humans?
How do you know those chinese are not legal immigrants, and just tourists overstaying their visa
The local residents lady was a Chinese herself that she described the situation.
Legal immigrants spend years and lots of money to come to the USA. In addition, stringent financial documentation, police records are reviewed as well.
If an American couple was visiting Italy, and the wife being pregnant gave birth while on vacation there, their child does not automatically become an Italian Citizen. The child becomes a Citizen of the Country of origin of it's parents. Citizenship in another Country must be applied for and granted only upon completion of the terms and conditions required. The 14th Amendment does not apply to children born of illegal immigrants because they are not subject to the jurisdiction thereof. As an illegal migrant, you have no expectation of rights or liberties that are only afforded to US Citizens.
There is no such thing as Birth Right Citizenship for undocumented persons in the Constitution.
Why you try to compare Italy with America
Please read the 14th amendment. "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
@lilinee3jeany865 it is not just Italy. Name any other country that will grant your baby citizenship if you are in their country illegally.
In Italy a foreign baby born in Italy can ask the citizenship at 18 years old and also the person can keep 2 passports.
B O O M!
Medical tourism and bonus of having a US citizen in the family going forward.
IF THEY ARE BORN TO LEGAL CITIZENS THEY HAVE A BIRTH CERTIFICATE. IF NOT ALL ARE
I L L E G A L.
Sorry, but that's not what the US constitution says.
@@LiamRappaport correct. The OP doesn't even understand why the islands are "unincorperated"
So what are you replacing it with to determine if someone is going to be a citizen who is born here in the future? Why don't we just do this retroactively to the beginning of our nation?
So, prior to 1776, got it...wouldn't bother Myself, My family OR My significant other. Can't really do it prior to that because there was no nation and as a result no enforceable laws, "on the books", by which to refer or render judgement.
Where is your family from? Unless you are Native American or your family was here before the creation of the United States, birthright citizenship is a fundamental part of your family’s history. It’s the reason you are here today as an American. Never forget that your ancestors, whether they came seeking freedom, opportunity, or refuge, were granted the right to build a future for themselves and their descendants through the principles of equality and inclusion. Birthright citizenship embodies those values-it’s not just a legal framework, but a recognition of the shared humanity and dignity of everyone born on this land. It’s what allowed generations to come together and make this country what it is today. Never let anyone take that away.
If this would of been in placed, we wouldn't have been burdened with Kamala. Neither parent was a naturalized citizen. The mother's student visa had expired too.
Thank you.
@@MsBizzyGurl you are welcome
The 14thA was never ratified properly anyway, much like the 16thA.
Where is the Mariana islands?
On June 16, 1866, the House Joint Resolution proposing the 14th Amendment to the Constitution was submitted to the states. On July 28, 1868, the 14th amendment was declared, in a certificate of the Secretary of State, ratified by the necessary 28 of the 37 States, and became part of the supreme law of the land.
Please read the 14th amendment. "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
You are not “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” if your parents are subject to the jurisdiction of another country. That’s the basis for extradition.
@@danielholtxxl4936 I understand your word play here, but you're rewriting the constitution and that's of the highest offense.
Very plainly it says, All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
Doesn't mention parents, slaves, illegals, or anything it literally just says all persons born here. You cannot get clearer than this. This is the constitution of the United States of America, if you don't like it then there are ways to amend the constitution. You need a proposed amendment to be passed by two-thirds of both houses of Congress, then ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states.
Common sense!
👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾Damn Right!!
Just tell me who gave illegals Constitutional rights 👀
@@tinab1317 the constitution. . Please educate yourself,
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
@ you can recite the text till you are blue in the face but that’s not what President Trump is asserting. He is saying that he doesn’t recognize illegals as his citizens and they aren’t entitled to his protection nor constitutional rights.
You should be required to be a CITIZEN of the US for one year before the birth of your child can be considered a US citizen.
The law says you must be a citizen for five years before your child a citizen.
Use _Jus Sanguini_ as they do in France, instead of using Jus Soli as you currently do in America. Case solved!
Not only in France but the whole UE : )
Use nothing, those shortcuts were used in the past to built nations with few inhabitants. It doesn't make sense in a world with 8 billions individuals.
I am just curious. Why do anybody want this Birthright Citizenship to go on? Justify this for me.
Well, kamala's parents were NOT US citizens, so she would not have been able to run for Pres/VP :)
Because it's part of the constitution 😂 you people have no spine
Impossible.....No justification exists. However, in reality its a scam for free money and easy citizenship....Then scam the system for every penny they can though BS programs...You never have to work, just play a good refugee victim and get shit handed to you on the taxpayer dime.
Birthright was intended for the freed slaves and their children following the end of the Civil War, but like so many laws that judges and lawyers start interpreting true meanings get twisted and abused. It will soon be back in the courts and I expect the main point to debate is no matter how you look at it it was never intended to be used by anyone in the USA illegally as they are undeniably criminals.
Because it's constitutional and has been a basic right to anyone born on US soil in the past 200 years... I'd even dare to say that it's common sense that anyone born on a country's land is automatically a citizen! After the baby is born, the family can go back to their native country. Once the child is of age, they have every right to go to their birth country and exercise their rights!
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." The 14th amendment was implemented for the protection of freed slaves, not visitors who had anchor babies.
The Civil Rights Act of 1866 declared: "... all persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States."
You can't illegally come here as a citizen of another country and have a baby who's automatically a citizen. Period.
Good grief.
Put it up for us U.S. Citizens to vote on. In less than an hour Birth-Right Citizenship will end.
Has to be a way of secure email , cell , voip , or some other tech way to have a secure vote.. 1 citizen , 1 vote ..secure , tallied up fast .. THEN all citizens could get in on votijng for EVERYTHING about our govt..
Nobody asked for this.
Everyone has been asking for term limits.
What happened? Recency bias? Where's the tariffs? Where's the peace making in Russia? Empty promises and "concepts of a plan"
We voted on November 5th, 2024.
if voting mattered, they wouldnt let us do it - mark twain
@@clydedenby1436 day 1 he would end the war. That's what we voted for. He literally said on Day 1. Prices still high. Wars still going. And now he's talking about vanity projects that were not even talked about then.
You were sold a lie.
GOD BLESS PRESIDENT TRUMP!!!!
Here and not a citizen, and give birth, sorry your kids aren't citizens
Plain and simple. 💁♂️
Correct.
💯
They are unless the SCOTUS says otherwise. Not you and definitely not Lord Emperor God King Trump.
Where is your family from? Unless you are Native American or your family was here before the creation of the United States, birthright citizenship is a fundamental part of your family’s history. It’s the reason you are here today as an American. Never forget that your ancestors, whether they came seeking freedom, opportunity, or refuge, were granted the right to build a future for themselves and their descendants through the principles of equality and inclusion. Birthright citizenship embodies those values-it’s not just a legal framework, but a recognition of the shared humanity and dignity of everyone born on this land. It’s what allowed generations to come together and make this country what it is today. Never let anyone take that away.
I have always argued that, two people who are not citizens of the U.S. and having a child on U.S. soil does not make the child a citizen. Many people do so on purpose for all the benefits of this country. Look at that guy bragging on the internet, that that best thing was having a baby here, and all the monetary benefits of living off of his child's benefits, that father was laughing his ass off on social media at how stupid U.S. laws are.
Well done Einstein. The ENTIRE point of this video and all the moves behind it ;)
Agreed, and kamala Harris should not have qualified as a naturalized US citizen. She would have been unqualified to run as president. Fortunately, losing the election sidestepped the issue.
@@kenrickhadley4499 ...and you have always been wrong.
A baby should only be an automatic citizen if at least one parent is a citizen and the other parent is either a citizen or a legal resident.
Stupid is as stupid says. We should debate and amend sections in the Constitution Trump dislikes but keep the ones he likes. Great logic. Why don't we debate the 2nd amendment?
As I said to everybody that thinks this is a loser when they bring up the 14th Amendment, show me ONE law that a newborn baby can be charged with? That is the simplest way to point out it's absurdity!
After this birthright citizenship loophole is closed, make sure temporary non-citizens do not get to adopt citizen orphans; because they will use that 200% to get citizenship.
Where is your family from? Unless you are Native American or your family was here before the creation of the United States, birthright citizenship is a fundamental part of your family’s history. It’s the reason you are here today as an American. Never forget that your ancestors, whether they came seeking freedom, opportunity, or refuge, were granted the right to build a future for themselves and their descendants through the principles of equality and inclusion. Birthright citizenship embodies those values-it’s not just a legal framework, but a recognition of the shared humanity and dignity of everyone born on this land. It’s what allowed generations to come together and make this country what it is today. Never let anyone take that away.
you do not understand what Birthright citizenship is or why the 14th amendment was adopted. birthright citizenship has NOTHING to do with my families history. the 14th amendment was solely directed at freed slaves. making everyone who was born here a citizen. it got bastardized much later and we will be paying the price for that until the end of time. it needs to be stopped now
Who's the frderal judge blocking the yhe order?
John Coughenour...a leftist 😒
@GiniaGuin thank you 😊
I think somebody needs to do a video on the constitution and show what it says about the birth right part of the 14 amendment
Yes, the full thing. Not just the "born here" part, but also the "under the jurisdiction" part. It is a condition of citizenship often overlooked.
This part “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” is conveniently ignored and this is what the Supreme Court has to resolve and make it clear that children born here of illegal parents or those on tourist visas should not be entitled to birthright citizenship.
@@emmanuelalviola4112 Yes, thank you for elaborating on what I said.
Birthright by Soil vs Birthright by Blood. In the case of an illegal the child would instantly become a dual citizen, one of origin of the parents and one of the soil they birthed. Birth tourism is the process of creating an anchor baby who will eventually sponsor other family members to immigrate. But how do you expel the non-citizen parents if the child has a birthright of soil.
You get rid of birthright citizenship. It’s easy.
I don't understand the issue.
Here in So Cal, many years ago, there were many Chinese birthing houses. California actually went after these parents and shut down many of these birthing houses. No one complained like they are doing today. Where I live, you would always see pregnant Chinese women walking from apartments to the shopping areas. Today, you hardly see any.
Here we go again, people debating like they're in the supreme court :)
You are law makers for so many years. Why you did not amend it if it not OK.
No non-US pregnant person should be allowed into the US until the law is changed to say that giving birth in the united states by an alien citizen does not automatically confer citizenship on the offspring..
If illegal immigrants are not subject to the jurisdiction that means they can not be held liable for breaking the laws since the jurisdiction laws won’t apply to them….is that what you want?
Exactly
That doesn’t make sense because when I visit Jamaica as a tourist I’m still required to respect Jamaica laws and I’m not entitled to citizenship
@tinab1317 you're under the jurisdiction of Jamaica,because you have to obey their laws and if you commit a crime,you're subject to their jurisdiction, which means you can go tk jail their
When you leave Jamaixa,and return to the US,you are no longer subject to their jurisdiction
@ so what are embassy’s for ?
The same arguments can be made ignore the 2nd amendment. Be careful what you wish for.
Problem here is the abuse of executive power. Pass a law or amendment to do it the right way.
Nope you're done
Abuse?! Nope. Trump flipped the switch. This is a topic that has long needed to be slugged out in court. Neither House or Senate would be virtue signaling about a bill if Trump hadn't beat the hornet's nest. It was 💯 the right move.
No, the problem here is this is another aspect of the Constitution that our resident Communists willfully abuse. Its going to court. We will see what happens there. The 14th amendment was never intended to be a rubber stamp for party crashers.
He has both houses. He can get any bills passed without letting the court to decide.
Let's look at what is really happening here, I will say it right here; Anchor baby is a term (regarded by some as a pejorative used to refer to a child born to non-citizen parents in a country that has birthright citizenship which will therefore help the parents and other family members gain legal residency or avoid deportation. In the U.S., the term is generally used as a derogatory reference to the supposed role of the child, who automatically qualifies as an American citizen under jus soli and the rights guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Do they not know they are abusing that 14th amendment, they come here illegally get themselves pregnant to have that anchor baby, they are not doing it just to have a child they are doing it for what is said above. Then you also have the ones who are already pregnant coming over the border illegally and then having that child on US soil as an anchor to get to stay here. Even if these judges know this they do not care and that is because of the 14th amendment, no matter if you're abusing the system if it's in the constitution it is set in stone no matter what.
Change the constitution or stop complaining.
How are you doing today?
@@DanRivers-t4t eh, decent. I'll be doing much better tomorrow though, since it's Friday. How about yourself?
The Constitution doesn't need to be changed, it needs to be enforced.
If an American couple was visiting Italy, and the wife being pregnant gave birth while on vacation there, their child does not automatically become an Italian Citizen. The child becomes a Citizen of the Country of origin of it's parents. Citizenship in another Country must be applied for and granted only upon completion of the terms and conditions required. The 14th Amendment does not apply to children born of illegal immigrants because they are not subject to the jurisdiction thereof. As an illegal migrant, you have no expectation of rights or liberties that are only afforded to US Citizens.
There is no such thing as Birth Right Citizenship for undocumented persons in the Constitution.
😂😂😂gotta learn to embrace the stupid😂😂😂 with all your might😂😂😂 you know, until ya squeeze it right out😊
I'm great today.....❤❤❤ sunshine, rainbow and unicorns just flew out my rose colored glasses...woo so awesome🎉
Where are my natives land of the free, take everyones citizenship away...
How could babies be weapons?
This means that The President himself is at risk, and Elon Musk is still not documented! Holy cra - Who came up with this treacherous piece of shame?
There are many ways to be in our Country legally without Citizenship. For instance:
A Green Card for employment, a Visa to attend Educational Institutions, a Visa for Travel and Vacation, a Visa to start a Company etc...
All of which can be a starting point to Naturalization through the proper channels.
Who cares.....its a beautiful day.....❤❤❤
You realise you can just invest in the country and get citizenship? Like most other countries. Money talks, and no country is under obligation to take on people needing welfare under their wing
So Trumps mother was an immigrant wouldn't he be an anchor baby
Legal immigrant
"anchor babies" are for the most part done on purpose to sneak into the country
Don't be obtuse.
@WayneGreen-r6z ohh obtuse. Big word
@WayneGreen-r6z I am not being insensitive nor, slow to understand