Thanks. I liked how the simple examples demonstrated a number of portfolio management issues. In particular I liked how there wasn't a single right choice and that the correct answer depended on your organizations desires.
@@pixbyeli Hello! The dice game is undergoing an update. We're anticipating 1.5-2 months before it'll be ready. I made a note to update this thread when it's available. -Teresa
@@MonsterMeatMac We no longer offer those courses. Here is our new Resources section. smartorg.com/resources/. At the bottom of the page is a professional development section. You may find the articles/videos there interesting.
Great. Re the 2 dimension portfoilo matrix, the analogy is little confusing; bread & butter, white elephant, pearl, and oyster. Wouldn't it be more appropriate example?
This grid was developed in the 1990s and appears in the attached article from Research-Technology Management May-June 1994. See the graphic on page 41 (Pg. 4 of the PDF). bit.ly/36ZbNqZ
Colin -- at the link smartorg.com/2014/03/portfolio-management-101/, check Slide 22. Does that answer your question? The tree is basically getting rolled back, by multiplying probabilities with the end point values.
What is the difference between what is discussed in this video, with the Boston Consulting Group Matrix? IThe two sound similar to me, except for the names used for the various projects eg Oysters/White Elephants/Pearls/Bread and Butter instead of Dogs, Cash cows, Question Marks and Stars?
Those themes can be interpreted very differently depending on the audience. Cash Cows sounds so much better than Question Marks. However, the talk demonstrates that might not always be the case.
This is a discussion on product portfolios in the innovation space. Here's a link for more information on this topic: smartorg.com/strategic-portfolio-management/
"Sometimes the person is important than ideas ".I hollered !
slam, just like the crinkets are in the road right?!
This lecture was truly brilliant! Thanks a lot
Glad you liked it! If any questions, please let us know.
Yeah, very brilliant
Thanks. I liked how the simple examples demonstrated a number of portfolio management issues. In particular I liked how there wasn't a single right choice and that the correct answer depended on your organizations desires.
Incredibly to the point. Beautiful explanation.
Thank you for your feedback!
Brilliant. Thank you.
You're very welcome! If you have any questions about the content, let us know.
Wonderful lecture
Thank you!
Awesome
Thank you so much for the lecture which really help me.
You're welcome! Glad you found the content useful.
Excellent lecture! Really easy to understand. Got a lot out if it! 👍
Great to hear! If you have any questions about the content, please let us know.
@@SmartOrgInc is there any place to access the dice game mentioned in this lecture online still? thank you.
@@pixbyeli Hello! The dice game is undergoing an update. We're anticipating 1.5-2 months before it'll be ready. I made a note to update this thread when it's available. -Teresa
Great lecture for beginners like myself
Glad you think so! Here are 2 free courses you may also benefit from: courses.smartorg.com/
@@SmartOrgInc I got a 404 error trying to pull up the course link above. Are they no longer available?
@@MonsterMeatMac We no longer offer those courses. Here is our new Resources section. smartorg.com/resources/. At the bottom of the page is a professional development section. You may find the articles/videos there interesting.
Great. Re the 2 dimension portfoilo matrix, the analogy is little confusing; bread & butter, white elephant, pearl, and oyster. Wouldn't it be more appropriate example?
This grid was developed in the 1990s and appears in the attached article from Research-Technology Management May-June 1994. See the graphic on page 41 (Pg. 4 of the PDF). bit.ly/36ZbNqZ
Quite an elaborating lecture of high standard
It would be nice to have the power point of this presentation
How does he arrive at those expected values for each scenario??
Colin -- at the link smartorg.com/2014/03/portfolio-management-101/, check Slide 22. Does that answer your question? The tree is basically getting rolled back, by multiplying probabilities with the end point values.
Somik Raha Okay I got, thank you Somik I appreciate that
What is the difference between what is discussed in this video, with the Boston Consulting Group Matrix? IThe two sound similar to me, except for the names used for the various projects eg Oysters/White Elephants/Pearls/Bread and Butter instead of Dogs, Cash cows, Question Marks and Stars?
Those themes can be interpreted very differently depending on the audience. Cash Cows sounds so much better than Question Marks. However, the talk demonstrates that might not always be the case.
It is the equivalent to the BCGM with different terminology.
Love this. Wonderful
EXCELLENT
The content is good
Excellent lessons I learned. Thanks
This talk was a little long winded and a bit dry...but I got some good points from it.
It's of an academic nature; however, we're glad you received some good points. If you have any additional questions, please let us know.
Throw "Strategic" on the front (of anything) and call it good.
Thanks a lot :)
Robinson Dorothy Allen Carol Lewis Michael
Doesn’t even talk about portfolios
This is a discussion on product portfolios in the innovation space. Here's a link for more information on this topic: smartorg.com/strategic-portfolio-management/