Комментарии •

  • @GurukulKaGyani
    @GurukulKaGyani 5 месяцев назад

    Superb Work Helpful For Advocates 🎉

  • @pradeepkumar-vw4zp
    @pradeepkumar-vw4zp 2 года назад

    I want to know where in this case law it is mentioned that income/assets affidavit is filed each and every maintenance cases... If wife not claim interim maintenance filing of this affidavit is mandatory or not..

  • @gogreenkpvlogs..1000
    @gogreenkpvlogs..1000 2 года назад +1

    Does this ruling applied retrospectively...also to 2019 cases of dv act

  • @sunnapumaddaiah9933
    @sunnapumaddaiah9933 Год назад

    Excellent explanation, thank you madam

  • @sunilswain02100
    @sunilswain02100 3 года назад +1

    Madam you are understanding all sections

  • @sujitchowdhury4361
    @sujitchowdhury4361 2 года назад

    In the judgment ,no where it is mentioned that the order has to be from the date of application,kindly clarify mam

  • @realdemon9153
    @realdemon9153 3 года назад +1

    Madamji, wife ne Dv k case march 2019 me dala with maintenance claim.wife mba qualified h aur koi baccha nahi h.maine sec 9 k case dala h. Abhi case counselling stage me h.2019 se wo khud court nahi ayi bas uska vakeel aya.fir lockdown laga.abhi feb 2021 me wo ayi aur hum dono ki batein sunne k bad judge ne counselling k liye bola.aur ab fir lockdown k wajah se delay hoga case. Maine uske aropo ko jhut sabit kiya h.mera abhi koi job nahi h.
    Ye bataiye jab bhi interim maintenance k order ayega to kya muje 2019 se le k abhi tak k poora mila k dena padega?agar pati unemployed h to kya patni apne sasur se maintenance claim kar sakti h, baccha na ho to??

  • @prarthanapal24
    @prarthanapal24 3 года назад +1

    Very well presented madam

  • @govindaiahn6727
    @govindaiahn6727 3 года назад +1

    Very good presentation madam

  • @ManojJainOfficial
    @ManojJainOfficial 2 года назад +4

    Rajnesh Vs Neha is an example of judicial activism prima facie appears to be in the teeth of Article 21 and 22 and against husband as may be seen from :
    1. It is against basic principle that onus of proof lies on person who alleges the fact. Here taking affidavit from respondent-husband means burden of proof from wife to prove income of husband is shifted to compel husband to disclose incriminating material against him.
    2. Providing detail of all assets and liabilities to strange wife may result into misuse of same by wife.
    3. No fix parameter has been fixed by court leaves enough scope by the conderned judge to fix maintenance as per his discretion.
    4. What purpose it going to serve when judiciary not providing settled principle or formula even after having access to all and sundry information of assets and liabilities.

  • @winmust2665
    @winmust2665 2 года назад +3

    Looting husband by educated wife who all are having affairs

  • @testuser8953
    @testuser8953 3 года назад +3

    I have seen wife's lie on this affidavit and still get away with it. Judges find it amusing and laugh it off when a woman lies.

  • @SURESHKUMAR-ml9fj
    @SURESHKUMAR-ml9fj 2 года назад

    Madem, I got divorce👪➡👨👩😭 on 2016, I don't have children👶👧👦 so for, she filled DV act and also 125crpc, In DV act the judge👨‍⚖️ has order to pay ₹6000, and compensation of 2 lakh,So if the order passed in family courts, means my question is if the order passed will be from the date of filling Or from the date of order passed please do say in next video.

  • @ArunKumar-ht8us
    @ArunKumar-ht8us 3 года назад +1

    Wow this is not equality... This is harassing men to loot. Instead of this she can work and tell self independent or what ever.

  • @sunilswain02100
    @sunilswain02100 3 года назад +1

    Madam I see your you tube .

  • @sunilswain02100
    @sunilswain02100 3 года назад

    Madam good afternoon