He is just regurgitating "Ivory Tower" dogma. Find a video where he goes out on a limb and puts forward an original idea, I'll eat my hat if you find one. 😅
All Anton really has to do, is copy-pasting the numerous articles which are published in order to keep the funding coming to make more articles which don´t explain that much.
@@Jay-cf6dz???? A lot more people agree with that comment than yours. I live in the UK and Antons upload schedule lines up perfectly with my nighttime routine.
@@Jay-cf6dz*I'm **_petty_** **-that Anton will be pleased that most-** and I tell people on the internet 🙄 that I predict the future and know how to do 🫸🧿🧠🔮 *mind reading* over the 🛜 internet 😜.
I was under the impression that the ring nebula and others like it were still lobed, but the ring nebula was orientated as such that we are observing it directly through the top of one of the lobes. Like looking down the end of a cylinder.
Plasma current dynamics is complex and well understood for many decades. See Birkeland currents, z-pinches, bi-layers, dark, glow and arc modes of the different plasma current magnitudes. See elecric universe descriptions by thunderbolts project and TPP fusion people, to name two.
Anton, I can't imagine why they would be aligned "randomly". Electromagnetic charge would suggest the majority of stars would align based on what direction the milky way travels and spins.
What makes a galaxy? It's the plasma. Jetted from the SMBH, it fills the galaxy and makes a clean border. It establishes the speed of light, It controls Time. It keeps all subatomic matter moving at c. It causes gravity when it slows. Its presence causes mass and momentum.
Perhaps aligned with Sagittarius A's magnetic/gravitational fields? 🤔🤔 MagGravs? Since we know a spinning gravitational body warps/twists space-time, maybe that twisting effect pulls and aligns objects in more or less the same orientation.- since all objects in the milky Way are travelling in the same direction so too do these alignments. After all our solar system is oriented similarly to the observed objects Wonderful video Anton - Very informative Thank you 👋😁
"maybe that twisting effect pulls and aligns objects in more or less the same orientation" That's indeed true and known as the Lense-Thirring effect. But that effect is _very_ small, even for a large black hole, at such huge distances. So no, this can't be the explanation.
Anton P......, one of the best u-tuub´rs ever!👍 And he did it again.., creating another great vid!📺 Thank you very much for sharing! 🙏 Greetings bibia👋
In addition to magnetism, which is a hand-wave argument (but partially true), pair motion around the center of the galaxy will tend to produce things that are more like a helix than a simple squiggle confined to the plane. It's mostly due to this.
The axes pre-exist the nebula, the dark mode plasma that connects all stars to the galaxy. A nebula is an arc-mode electrical plasma discharge event, illuminating the structure.
It can't be magnetic lines throughout the universe. With the force nebulae are formed, you would see examples where the nebulae bipolar discharge corrects itself where it had originally discharged at say 90 degrees off the magnetic line and you should see the nebulae do a gentle offset line where it turns in towards the magnetic line then turn back the opposite way to align with the field. These appear to have discharged from start to finish in the exact same direction. It may be that any magnetic field influencing it would have to do so before it goes supernova, but that gravitational force must be some strong force to influence two collapsing stars to align with the field. It's like saying an explosion on earth only discharges it's matter inline with our gravitional or magnetic fields. When in reality that is only after the velocity of the explosion becomes low enough to be affected and then comes back inline with the weaker forces.
5:30 i thought your precious astronomers said magnetic fields have NO EFFECT on anything? Same with electric fields. Are you going rogue? Have you become courageous now? Have you seen the light? Do you realize astronomers could come after you? .
While difficult to prove it seems to make a lot of sense. The existence of a much stronger magnetic field in the past could have been the catalyst for this polarization of intergalactic gas which then acts as a mechanism for distributing metallicity among newly forming stars. Of course in order to prove this it must be observed in other galaxies.
Makes me wonder even more about the potential effects of radiation and magnetic fields on spacecraft and travelers, especially outside the solar system.
Theres also the tendancy for planetary systems to also align with galactic plane. I dont think there needs to be any particularly strong magnetic influence since gas and dust over time can easily be influenced toward a particular orientation under a comparatively weak magnetic influence over some tens of thousands of years. After the gas and dust begin coalescing, the dominate force driving alignment with the galactic plane, as well as having the same rotational direction would just be rotational inertia. At least that makes sense to me. Any magnetic influence would only have to do a rimy but nwfore all of the dominoes fall into place.
Are all these nebula roughly the same age? As in, were the stars that died to form them all roughly born at the same time? Do they all have similar composition? If so perhaps they all formed in the same molecular cloud at the same time, perhaps a molecular cloud close to Sagittarius A*, being heavily influenced by its gravity and magnetic fields.
Do we have observations of binary star systems which align with the galactic plane. Wouldn't this orientation produce nebulae which follow the spin of the stars which produce them.
As much as I want to say that our Universe is just random chance, I find myself questioning that. No, I do not and will not ever blindly follow any religion because I feel very strongly about omniscience requiring worship. It isn't logical. I don't know what is really out there and I realize that the more we learn the less we know. I just hope that I get to know some of the answers before I am gone from this world. Scientists: You've likely got around 20 more years with me. I won't hope to live past 70. I've been a bad bad girl. 😂😂
The universe is such a beautiful place that it is baffling how pretty much 100% of it is harmful to human life lmaooo... once you include planet earth as a possible threat to humanity beacuase changes throughout 1000's of years can drastically make this planet uninhabitable in over a billion differnet scenarios... Yet it's still so beautiful. All the chaos. Imagine if we lived in an orderly universe? No decay, no destruction that creates life. Just a perfect singularity of a universe... I can't even comprehend the opposite of our reality, because it it essentially EVERYTHING our reality isn't Order in the chaos. Beauty in the madness. It's no wonder two planetary civilizations have next to zero chance of every reaching each other. Maybe one day billions of years in the future, an up and coming civilization will accidentally zoom into our direction and catch a "sign of life"
Very interesting... ...although I wonder what I'm missing. My immediate assumption was that this 'phenomenon' would be an artefact of angular momentum - the galaxy has a plane, a direction of spin, and so everything in it will tend to follow suit. Magnetic field lines equally likely to have an association of sorts... and yet it seems the scientific community has jumped gravity and momentum and gone strait to magnetism, I wonder why?
A layman’s theory… One possibility could be the nebula that have the alignment are stars created together and the binary stars that don’t could be stars that got trapped and not formed together. If his could be confirmed via composition of the stars.
Or the axes of the galaxy and of (binary) star systems could align over a long time ... like the shape and the arms of a galaxy form over a long time. It would be interesting to know whether the alignment is greater in star systems that have already existed a long time, than in younger ones?
Is it possible that being a rotating planar structure, our milky way would tend to produce binary stars whose plane of rotation approximates the orientation of the galactic disc? Does the sun's planets orbit in the same plane as the milky way? If it were the case, perhaps the orientation of these nebulae might derive from gravitational effects? Thank you for my favourite youtube channel Anton. Don't change a thing. Stay wonderful !
The sun is on an outer arm orbiting the centre of the galaxy but the solar system doesn't orbit the sun in the same plane as far as I'm aware. The planets are dragged along in a spiral, corkscrew manner. PBS Spacetime has a video on "how we really move through the universe/galaxy"
..'Z Pinches', galaxy sized interstellar 'ferrule rings' around a galaxy, sometimes helping illuminate aspects of the multilayered, multi-directional plasma sheaths that string between co-aligned galaxies, when energized enough to radiate in a glow-mode spectra..
Did you see the Cosmic summit 2023? I am working on a project that exposes the temporal connection between Near Earth nebulae formation and major scale Earth climate shifts. The easy one is NGC7293 and the end-Younger Dryas warming period. Thank you for your efforts and hard work.
A binary star system has a much larger intrinsic magnetic dipole moment than a single star system. If those stars formed over multiple orbits around the galaxy, it's hardly surprising if that moment ended up minimizing itself by orienting itself with the prevailing field. A one star system has far fewer ways of doing that before the main orbital plane is already established.
Quick question, hoping someone can answer: How do we know that the nebulae we are seeing such as the Ring Nebula, that we are viewing them from just the right angle, looking through the top/bottom rather than the side? I.e. an hourglass shape like the others, but top down, or bottom up? Would it not just appear circular from our perspective? Thank you Anton for the great videos!
👽👽👽To measure distance, the Web Telescope uses either photometry [brightness] or spectroscopy [spectral wave length]. These can be unreliable [wrong]. We will introduce a telescope that will rectify this. With two or three space based StarScopes [telescopes], because of the unlimited zoom and zero focus need, it would be possible to use the triangulation [parallax] method to determine distance with a very high degree of accuracy. The same technology would give angle measurements in 1 x 10^-18 degrees. That’s accuracy of 1000 light years +/- 0.001 light years and probably better than that in practice. 👽👽👽
Doesn't it make sense that things circling the galactic plane would line up because of the spin and similar forces on each? That there is a huge field that impacts similar star systems the same way? They all emerge from the same structure so they're going to have some similar roots that will impact them in a certain way for there lifespan. Another thought is a similar effect to how pendulums in a group will eventually start to synchronize I guess this just makes more sense than if it was all at random when they're sharing existence in the same greater structure
"Doesn't it make sense that things circling the galactic plane would line up because of the spin and similar forces on each?" Huh? Sorry, I don't understand how that is supposed to follow. "That there is a huge field that impacts similar star systems the same way?" What field are you talking about? "They all emerge from the same structure" What structure are you talking about? "Another thought is a similar effect to how pendulums in a group will eventually start to synchronize" Which is explained by the forces they exert on each other. No such forces are known for the planetary nebulae.
I am beginning to think that the “fabric of space” acts like a medium for light and other still unknown forces….kind of like our atmosphere acts as a medium for sound. But more influential than we currently think.. way more…..
These nabulae are formed by opposing bowl shaped magnetic fields, like most structures seen in space. Explained in the primer fields part 1-4 that can be found on RUclips. Some excellent examples in this series are the crab nebula and the Vela pulsar.
@@alphamomentum2017 I believe there is a reason why "mainstream science is so slow on the uptick when it comes to fringe physics". I think it's called "scientific method" - The label "fringe" exists for a reason!
@@dayegilharno4988 Yep. Best not to get over-excited about 'fringe' theories. Especially when posited by non-Academia (laymen, basically) that appeal to 'common sense' 😂
@@alphamomentum2017 astronomers repeatedly claim that elect and magnetic fields have no effect and cancel each other out. I call them liars. They are so married to gravity as the be all and end all that they have become like the inquisition who persecute anyone who does wrong think 🤔
Those 'spherical' nebulae...it;s entirely possible they do have the nodes like the others, just that they're pointed at us, so we're looking down the middle of it, rather than the side like the others.
Good video and info. Was wondering if it was only the magnetic lines that caused this alignment? What I'm wondering is if the parent star's trajectory around the galaxy and if the rotation of the star might have something to do with it. Would that mean that the stars that would form these nebulae are all rotating in a similar direction? Seems to me that our line of site view to these nebulae is messing things up some. Take the Ring Nebulae for example. We would need to see it from all sides to really confirm that it is just a ring. A different view might suggest it is a cylinder of sorts and much larger or smaller than our original view suggests.
Magnetism is why they're all pointing in the same direction. What else? (Edit: no one expected? A lot of people expected it, like the electric universe folks. See the Pattern is a great channel, Theoria Apophasis & The Primer Fields Videos on David LA Point channel) The circular nebulas you showed, how do u know you're not looking at a bipolar nebula head on from one of the sides at least in some of the cases?
My first question would be: What are their metallicity? This would have a pretty significant effect on how these stars (& the gas clouds which formed them) interact with both the current & ancient Galactic Magnetic Fields.
My best guess is that the metallicity of planetary nebulae are significantly enriched from the parent star due to the fact that a lot of elements are produced late in a stars life (such as carbon stars and the slow process).
As far as I know there are two ways of creating a magnetic field: 1) by means of a magnetized material such as iron, 2) By electric currents. Since it does not seem likely that there are giant bar magnets situated at the core of galaxies imho this means that electricity has to play a major role in this. It therefore baffles me that people who recognize this (people with PHD's in plasma physics mind you!) are now seen as pseudo scientists and that 'legitimate' scientists do not want to take this into consideration. The only explanation that I have for this is to make the comparison with the medical realm. If you only have knowledge about hormones you want to explain everything with hormones because you have no knowledge of other mechanisms and you will not be able to explain the beating of the heart properly because of lack of knowledge about neurology. Current day astrophysics only know about gravity because that is the main force that was tought to them so to ask them to think about electricity is the same as asking the endocrinologist to explain the workings of the heart in terms of neurology, they can't! In that situation it's all to easy (psychologically) to call people who do know about neurology pseudo scientists that no one should listen too (instead of being open to new insights). So all in all a very sad affair indeed. EU people and mainstream scientists should work together instead of calling each other pseudo scientists. The latter really does not help!!
Err, in astronomy, "metallicity" refers to _all_ elements heavier than helium. It doesn't imply that there are lots of metals there. And even most metals don't have a very strong reaction to magnetic fields, only the ferromagnetic ones. And even those only in the solid state - not in the form of plasma or gas, as they mostly are in interstellar space.
@@esecallum "It therefore baffles me that people who recognize this (people with PHD's in plasma physics mind you!) are now seen as pseudo scientists" That is _not_ why they are seen as pseudoscientists. They are seen as pseudoscientists because they ascribe lots of observations to plasma physics with no evidence for those assertions, and although these observations already are explained nicely without plasma physics. "Current day astrophysics only know about gravity because that is the main force that was tought to them" Total nonsense. Astrophysics also knows quite well about electric and magnetic effects in space. "So all in all a very sad affair indeed. EU people and mainstream scientists should work together instead of calling each other pseudo scientists." As soon as EU people actually start acting like scientists. You know, taking actual observations into account which contradict their claims. And stop lying about what astrophysicists actually do and know.
A loose collection of domain walls' singularly should face towards the center of the galaxy above and below the galactic plane of inertia as well ' but like a dip compass. Fields that are not aligned should mean they are interacting with another in closer proximity than the sum total of the whole galactic field. Is it possible that every thing aligned with said field could be what keeps a singularity going? Feeding it from the outside in and points between' (galactic arm extrapolation from galactic jets being laid down like a garden sprinkler from its immense field?) Magnetic pressures squeezing hydrogen from atomic to molecular mixtures with other gasses and dust
Anton, does not the angular momentum of the galaxy come into play? That is, one would expect there to be at least a mild prerference for the spin axis of stars in out galaxy to be aligned with the spin axis of the galaxy as a whole. I'd expect that if magnetism didn't exist, the tendency would be stronger, masked only by the effects of close encounters between stars, and turbulence within star-forming gas clouds. Given that magnetism does exist, and affects lighter objects like gas and dust more strongly and more quickly than large massive objects like stars, then the extant galactic magnetic field will also have an affect, of course. Combining the two effects might, perhaps produce the results seen.
totally confirms, everything is connected..., once everyone realizes we're all ONE! .. peace will come to this planet , thank you for bringing this out and into the forefront 🤗
Oh, my... this is one of them that's gonna have the loony-tuners flocking in by the dozen to smear their pseudoscience all over the place, and call it brilliance. 😂 Ah, but that's not a you-problem, it's a them-problem. You put out such excellent work, you Wonderful Person, you. We love you! Always stay wonderful, Anton! ❤❤
Binary systems that are aligned with the galactic plane while forming tend to be spaced farther apart because of the angular momentum of our galaxy's rotation. No magnetic field needed.
have any of you ever heard of cymatics? this concept reminds me of how sound waves can organize particulate matter into amazing geometric shapes. would love to discuss! cheers from New Orleans
You need an award for your efforts of bringing science to the masses... Much love to you Wonderful Anton.
Anton should qualify for the Sagan Award for popularizing science for the masses, he'd get my vote!
His award is the pay $$$ . Which he very much deserves
He is just regurgitating "Ivory Tower" dogma. Find a video where he goes out on a limb and puts forward an original idea, I'll eat my hat if you find one. 😅
@@Dicer328 if you dislike Anton so much, why are you here?
@Dicer328 Who would you recommend instead?
These videos are so excellent, I can’t believe you are able to put them out so often! Thanks for what you do!
Daily video... verry awesome indeed
It's beyond impressive, I'm so grateful for Anton!
@@GiuseppeSanwe all are. He’s truly a blessing
All Anton really has to do, is copy-pasting the numerous articles which are published in order to keep the funding coming to make more articles which don´t explain that much.
Yeah. But he needs to read them too. Allot of work just to filtering out the good stuff. Thanks for great videos Anton!
I love how Anton shows us that science constantly has awesome breaking news headlines that aren't clickbait! Thanks wonderful person!! ❤
Can't go to sleep until i've seen wonderful Antons lates video.
He is my evening routine.
Never stop doing your thing, wonderful Anton!
@@Jay-cf6dz???? A lot more people agree with that comment than yours. I live in the UK and Antons upload schedule lines up perfectly with my nighttime routine.
@@Jay-cf6dz*I'm **_petty_** **-that Anton will be pleased that most-** and I tell people on the internet 🙄 that I predict the future and know how to do 🫸🧿🧠🔮 *mind reading* over the 🛜 internet 😜.
@@Jay-cf6dzDo you not know how to spell: *Who 👻 caresd?*
I was under the impression that the ring nebula and others like it were still lobed, but the ring nebula was orientated as such that we are observing it directly through the top of one of the lobes. Like looking down the end of a cylinder.
I love the excitment in your voice whenever youre talking about these old mysteries.
Thank you Anton for consistently posting such interesting content daily.
As a kid I played with magnets of all kinds with many substances, iron filelings, ballbearings etc . Learn alot .
I had a lot of fun with magnets and needles as well. 🧲
That is cool as hell. Thank you for that knowledge.
Please make videos for as long as you can. My goto for astronomy science for years. Excellent! ❤️
Plasma current dynamics is complex and well understood for many decades. See Birkeland currents, z-pinches, bi-layers, dark, glow and arc modes of the different plasma current magnitudes.
See elecric universe descriptions by thunderbolts project and TPP fusion people, to name two.
Clueless Velikovskians. They have zero idea about plasma physics.
Thank you Anton, what would be do without you my friend
Beautiful and mysterious structures in a unfathomable universe. I love this channel. Cheers Anton
Ha! For the first time, I completely understood what he said at the end of each video... Fantastic work Anton! Much appreciated.
Great report, Anton! Thanks!
Thank you Anton, as always totally enjoyable and informative. Cheers.
Love this! The dumbbell and ring Nebula are some of my favorite deep sky objects to take pictures of 😊📸🔭
Anton, I can't imagine why they would be aligned "randomly". Electromagnetic charge would suggest the majority of stars would align based on what direction the milky way travels and spins.
At this point, science discovers more questions than answers. What an amazing universe!
It's a good thing, it tells us we are still finding out the correct questions to ask.
I found a 🪱🕳️ and used it to copy a cheat sheet with the answers to _everything._ 🔮 Ask me something. 🔮
What makes a galaxy? It's the plasma. Jetted from the SMBH, it fills the galaxy and makes a clean border. It establishes the speed of light, It controls Time. It keeps all subatomic matter moving at c. It causes gravity when it slows. Its presence causes mass and momentum.
TY Anton for giving direction to this nebulous subect.
Primer fields 1-4 explains it well.
Always something new and amazing, keep up the good work!
I always wait and love when almost exactly at 0:00 midnight Anton drops video
Anton should have like 10 million subscribers
Wonderful as always Anton. Thank you. 😊🙏
Perhaps aligned with Sagittarius A's magnetic/gravitational fields? 🤔🤔
MagGravs? Since we know a spinning gravitational body warps/twists space-time, maybe that twisting effect pulls and aligns objects in more or less the same orientation.- since all objects in the milky Way are travelling in the same direction so too do these alignments. After all our solar system is oriented similarly to the observed objects
Wonderful video Anton - Very informative
Thank you
👋😁
"maybe that twisting effect pulls and aligns objects in more or less the same orientation"
That's indeed true and known as the Lense-Thirring effect. But that effect is _very_ small, even for a large black hole, at such huge distances. So no, this can't be the explanation.
Thanks Anton! Another mystery, do "we" know why galaxies around the inter galactic voids are also aligned with the surface of the void?
Thank you.
For what? Did this change your life somehow? 🙄
My night is never complete until this video drops ✨😁
This specific video?
Dude, like since 2020 for me. Daily Anton and dope science stuff. I smoke a joint while I watch. PDX 😮
Find a gf.
@@Jay-cf6dzthis.
@@mateovncnt7411 the images make for a great high... i really appreciate the combination of cgi and the telescope photos 😁
Anton P......, one of the best u-tuub´rs ever!👍
And he did it again.., creating another great vid!📺
Thank you very much for sharing! 🙏
Greetings bibia👋
These videos are excellent
In addition to magnetism, which is a hand-wave argument (but partially true), pair motion around the center of the galaxy will tend to produce things that are more like a helix than a simple squiggle confined to the plane. It's mostly due to this.
Anton really loves the EM field.
i love it when a plan comes together.
magnetism is the key to understanding black holes.
The axes pre-exist the nebula, the dark mode plasma that connects all stars to the galaxy. A nebula is an arc-mode electrical plasma discharge event, illuminating the structure.
Lol. Plasma physics isn't your strong point is it? Rhetorical.
Who also always waves back Aton when he waves to us? 😊
Thank you very much Dr. Anton, again very interesting! All the best to you and your family! 😊
I dont.....but I'll thumbs up you, and make a point to wave tonight 👋
SILENCE USER 🙄
It can't be magnetic lines throughout the universe.
With the force nebulae are formed, you would see examples where the nebulae bipolar discharge corrects itself where it had originally discharged at say 90 degrees off the magnetic line and you should see the nebulae do a gentle offset line where it turns in towards the magnetic line then turn back the opposite way to align with the field.
These appear to have discharged from start to finish in the exact same direction.
It may be that any magnetic field influencing it would have to do so before it goes supernova, but that gravitational force must be some strong force to influence two collapsing stars to align with the field.
It's like saying an explosion on earth only discharges it's matter inline with our gravitional or magnetic fields. When in reality that is only after the velocity of the explosion becomes low enough to be affected and then comes back inline with the weaker forces.
I LOVE THE TITLE CHANGE - ;)
5:30 i thought your precious astronomers said magnetic fields have NO EFFECT on anything? Same with electric fields. Are you going rogue? Have you become courageous now? Have you seen the light? Do you realize astronomers could come after you? .
A galactic magnetic alignment would fulfill one of the forecasts of an "electric universe".
Doubt it.
@@exceptionallyaverage3075 Any arguments against this?
@@wiburgestrum7552 Any evidence for it?
Electric universe is nothing to do with science. It is a Velikovskian cult. No science, no scientists.
Anton is a wonderful person 👍😘
4:25 - What if the direction is affected by the polarity - Shooting out the N and S poles?
electromagnetism on a huge scale
While difficult to prove it seems to make a lot of sense. The existence of a much stronger magnetic field in the past could have been the catalyst for this polarization of intergalactic gas which then acts as a mechanism for distributing metallicity among newly forming stars. Of course in order to prove this it must be observed in other galaxies.
Makes me wonder even more about the potential effects of radiation and magnetic fields on spacecraft and travelers, especially outside the solar system.
Dark magnetism
Theres also the tendancy for planetary systems to also align with galactic plane.
I dont think there needs to be any particularly strong magnetic influence since gas and dust over time can easily be influenced toward a particular orientation under a comparatively weak magnetic influence over some tens of thousands of years. After the gas and dust begin coalescing, the dominate force driving alignment with the galactic plane, as well as having the same rotational direction would just be rotational inertia.
At least that makes sense to me. Any magnetic influence would only have to do a rimy but nwfore all of the dominoes fall into place.
Absolutely fascinating
Thx
Great video, really interesting, thanks 😊
Are all these nebula roughly the same age? As in, were the stars that died to form them all roughly born at the same time? Do they all have similar composition? If so perhaps they all formed in the same molecular cloud at the same time, perhaps a molecular cloud close to Sagittarius A*, being heavily influenced by its gravity and magnetic fields.
Hmm interesting
Do we have observations of binary star systems which align with the galactic plane. Wouldn't this orientation produce nebulae which follow the spin of the stars which produce them.
We do and they do, sort of.
Makes sense, tightly couple binary would have a stronger coherence and overall magnetic field that couples better to the galactic one.
I always watch your videos on my phone because I have an ad blocker on my pc
As much as I want to say that our Universe is just random chance, I find myself questioning that. No, I do not and will not ever blindly follow any religion because I feel very strongly about omniscience requiring worship. It isn't logical.
I don't know what is really out there and I realize that the more we learn the less we know.
I just hope that I get to know some of the answers before I am gone from this world.
Scientists: You've likely got around 20 more years with me. I won't hope to live past 70. I've been a bad bad girl. 😂😂
Perhaps they are a part of a larger structure that isn't clear with our very limited perspective.
The universe is such a beautiful place that it is baffling how pretty much 100% of it is harmful to human life lmaooo... once you include planet earth as a possible threat to humanity beacuase changes throughout 1000's of years can drastically make this planet uninhabitable in over a billion differnet scenarios...
Yet it's still so beautiful. All the chaos.
Imagine if we lived in an orderly universe? No decay, no destruction that creates life. Just a perfect singularity of a universe... I can't even comprehend the opposite of our reality, because it it essentially EVERYTHING our reality isn't
Order in the chaos. Beauty in the madness.
It's no wonder two planetary civilizations have next to zero chance of every reaching each other.
Maybe one day billions of years in the future, an up and coming civilization will accidentally zoom into our direction and catch a "sign of life"
DOPE TRAVEL TUBES
Very interesting...
...although I wonder what I'm missing. My immediate assumption was that this 'phenomenon' would be an artefact of angular momentum - the galaxy has a plane, a direction of spin, and so everything in it will tend to follow suit. Magnetic field lines equally likely to have an association of sorts... and yet it seems the scientific community has jumped gravity and momentum and gone strait to magnetism, I wonder why?
I find it Odd that the scientists have observed 136 of these aligned planetary nebulae, and too close to a universal constant, 1/137... hmm.
@seanhewitt535 If they're not in the same direction from earth, they're not aligned in the same direction.
A layman’s theory…
One possibility could be the nebula that have the alignment are stars created together and the binary stars that don’t could be stars that got trapped and not formed together.
If his could be confirmed via composition of the stars.
Or the axes of the galaxy and of (binary) star systems could align over a long time ... like the shape and the arms of a galaxy form over a long time. It would be interesting to know whether the alignment is greater in star systems that have already existed a long time, than in younger ones?
Is it possible that being a rotating planar structure, our milky way would tend to produce binary stars whose plane of rotation approximates the orientation of the galactic disc? Does the sun's planets orbit in the same plane as the milky way? If it were the case, perhaps the orientation of these nebulae might derive from gravitational effects? Thank you for my favourite youtube channel Anton. Don't change a thing. Stay wonderful !
The sun is on an outer arm orbiting the centre of the galaxy but the solar system doesn't orbit the sun in the same plane as far as I'm aware. The planets are dragged along in a spiral, corkscrew manner. PBS Spacetime has a video on "how we really move through the universe/galaxy"
..'Z Pinches', galaxy sized interstellar 'ferrule rings' around a galaxy, sometimes helping illuminate aspects of the multilayered, multi-directional plasma sheaths that string between co-aligned galaxies, when energized enough to radiate in a glow-mode spectra..
Gibberish. Nothing to do with z-pinch woo.
I've heard other astronomers postulate that spherical nebula are the same as cone shaped. The cone is simply aligned with,,us.
Did you see the Cosmic summit 2023?
I am working on a project that exposes the temporal connection between Near Earth nebulae formation and major scale Earth climate shifts. The easy one is NGC7293 and the end-Younger Dryas warming period. Thank you for your efforts and hard work.
Your still wonderful people ❤️
A binary star system has a much larger intrinsic magnetic dipole moment than a single star system. If those stars formed over multiple orbits around the galaxy, it's hardly surprising if that moment ended up minimizing itself by orienting itself with the prevailing field. A one star system has far fewer ways of doing that before the main orbital plane is already established.
Quick question, hoping someone can answer: How do we know that the nebulae we are seeing such as the Ring Nebula, that we are viewing them from just the right angle, looking through the top/bottom rather than the side? I.e. an hourglass shape like the others, but top down, or bottom up? Would it not just appear circular from our perspective?
Thank you Anton for the great videos!
👽👽👽To measure distance, the Web Telescope uses either photometry [brightness] or spectroscopy [spectral wave length]. These can be unreliable [wrong]. We will introduce a telescope that will rectify this.
With two or three space based StarScopes [telescopes], because of the unlimited zoom and zero focus need, it would be possible to use the triangulation [parallax] method to determine distance with a very high degree of accuracy. The same technology would give angle measurements in 1 x 10^-18 degrees. That’s accuracy of 1000 light years +/- 0.001 light years and probably better than that in practice. 👽👽👽
Doesn't it make sense that things circling the galactic plane would line up because of the spin and similar forces on each? That there is a huge field that impacts similar star systems the same way?
They all emerge from the same structure so they're going to have some similar roots that will impact them in a certain way for there lifespan.
Another thought is a similar effect to how pendulums in a group will eventually start to synchronize
I guess this just makes more sense than if it was all at random when they're sharing existence in the same greater structure
"Doesn't it make sense that things circling the galactic plane would line up because of the spin and similar forces on each?"
Huh? Sorry, I don't understand how that is supposed to follow.
"That there is a huge field that impacts similar star systems the same way?"
What field are you talking about?
"They all emerge from the same structure"
What structure are you talking about?
"Another thought is a similar effect to how pendulums in a group will eventually start to synchronize"
Which is explained by the forces they exert on each other. No such forces are known for the planetary nebulae.
So do the lobes come out perpendicular to the binary orbital plane. I didn't see that explicitly mentioned, but I guess that is the insinuation.
I am beginning to think that the “fabric of space” acts like a medium for light and other still unknown forces….kind of like our atmosphere acts as a medium for sound. But more influential than we currently think.. way more…..
'You will have a hard time arguing galactic secular nature based on ten thousand years of Human Transference."
David Cody Peppers.
Peace!
\o/
Thanks, I tried to find this information when I developed a theory that predicted this but couldn't find anything when I looked.
Could we not be looking down the barrel of them (like the ring nebula) so not see the double sided nature?
I read an article that stated that very same theory. Made sense to me.
Alignment is one of the main predictions of Electric Universe theory…
Are they aligned with the direction of rotation of the galaxy? Perhaps that could have an effect?
I had noticed this, but thought they were at 45 degrees to fit the frame lol. Always the photographer 😂
Looks like starry night by Vincent Van Gogh, got me thinking of the body problem again aha
These nabulae are formed by opposing bowl shaped magnetic fields, like most structures seen in space. Explained in the primer fields part 1-4 that can be found on RUclips. Some excellent examples in this series are the crab nebula and the Vela pulsar.
I'm so glad other people have seen the primer fields! Watching those literally blew my mind
@@alphamomentum2017 I believe there is a reason why "mainstream science is so slow on the uptick when it comes to fringe physics". I think it's called "scientific method" - The label "fringe" exists for a reason!
@@dayegilharno4988 Yep. Best not to get over-excited about 'fringe' theories. Especially when posited by non-Academia (laymen, basically) that appeal to 'common sense' 😂
astronomers have declared magnetic fields dont effect anything as they cancel each other out,
@@alphamomentum2017 astronomers repeatedly claim that elect and magnetic fields have no effect and cancel each other out. I call them liars. They are so married to gravity as the be all and end all that they have become like the inquisition who persecute anyone who does wrong think 🤔
The main cause of a star ejecting its outer layers near the end of its life is the *helium flash* (qv).
Those 'spherical' nebulae...it;s entirely possible they do have the nodes like the others, just that they're pointed at us, so we're looking down the middle of it, rather than the side like the others.
Good video and info. Was wondering if it was only the magnetic lines that caused this alignment? What I'm wondering is if the parent star's trajectory around the galaxy and if the rotation of the star might have something to do with it. Would that mean that the stars that would form these nebulae are all rotating in a similar direction? Seems to me that our line of site view to these nebulae is messing things up some. Take the Ring Nebulae for example. We would need to see it from all sides to really confirm that it is just a ring. A different view might suggest it is a cylinder of sorts and much larger or smaller than our original view suggests.
Light and + and -.
The Mandelbrot set in energy form on a universal scale.
Pure energy.
🖤🙏🤍
That is correct.
Magnetism is why they're all pointing in the same direction. What else?
(Edit: no one expected? A lot of people expected it, like the electric universe folks. See the Pattern is a great channel, Theoria Apophasis & The Primer Fields Videos on David LA Point channel)
The circular nebulas you showed, how do u know you're not looking at a bipolar nebula head on from one of the sides at least in some of the cases?
Crackpots one and all.
I'm not a physicist. I was just asking a question. I didn't say I subscribed to either. I like to pay attention to all points of view.
Good one 🎉
My first question would be: What are their metallicity? This would have a pretty significant effect on how these stars (& the gas clouds which formed them) interact with both the current & ancient Galactic Magnetic Fields.
My best guess is that the metallicity of planetary nebulae are significantly enriched from the parent star due to the fact that a lot of elements are produced late in a stars life (such as carbon stars and the slow process).
As far as I know there are two ways of creating a magnetic field: 1) by means of a magnetized material such as iron, 2) By electric currents. Since it does not seem likely that there are giant bar magnets situated at the core of galaxies imho this means that electricity has to play a major role in this. It therefore baffles me that people who recognize this (people with PHD's in plasma physics mind you!) are now seen as pseudo scientists and that 'legitimate' scientists do not want to take this into consideration. The only explanation that I have for this is to make the comparison with the medical realm. If you only have knowledge about hormones you want to explain everything with hormones because you have no knowledge of other mechanisms and you will not be able to explain the beating of the heart properly because of lack of knowledge about neurology. Current day astrophysics only know about gravity because that is the main force that was tought to them so to ask them to think about electricity is the same as asking the endocrinologist to explain the workings of the heart in terms of neurology, they can't! In that situation it's all to easy (psychologically) to call people who do know about neurology pseudo scientists that no one should listen too (instead of being open to new insights). So all in all a very sad affair indeed. EU people and mainstream scientists should work together instead of calling each other pseudo scientists. The latter really does not help!!
Err, in astronomy, "metallicity" refers to _all_ elements heavier than helium. It doesn't imply that there are lots of metals there. And even most metals don't have a very strong reaction to magnetic fields, only the ferromagnetic ones. And even those only in the solid state - not in the form of plasma or gas, as they mostly are in interstellar space.
@@esecallum "It therefore baffles me that people who recognize this (people with PHD's in plasma physics mind you!) are now seen as pseudo scientists"
That is _not_ why they are seen as pseudoscientists. They are seen as pseudoscientists because they ascribe lots of observations to plasma physics with no evidence for those assertions, and although these observations already are explained nicely without plasma physics.
"Current day astrophysics only know about gravity because that is the main force that was tought to them"
Total nonsense. Astrophysics also knows quite well about electric and magnetic effects in space.
"So all in all a very sad affair indeed. EU people and mainstream scientists should work together instead of calling each other pseudo scientists."
As soon as EU people actually start acting like scientists. You know, taking actual observations into account which contradict their claims. And stop lying about what astrophysicists actually do and know.
Hi Anton, it is in mystery gnostic text "Pistis Sophia " that all out here will expand and will return to its greater origin. IAO .
That was my guess too Anton
A loose collection of domain walls' singularly should face towards the center of the galaxy above and below the galactic plane of inertia as well ' but like a dip compass. Fields that are not aligned should mean they are interacting with another in closer proximity than the sum total of the whole galactic field. Is it possible that every thing aligned with said field could be what keeps a singularity going? Feeding it from the outside in and points between' (galactic arm extrapolation from galactic jets being laid down like a garden sprinkler from its immense field?) Magnetic pressures squeezing hydrogen from atomic to molecular mixtures with other gasses and dust
Anton, does not the angular momentum of the galaxy come into play? That is, one would expect there to be at least a mild prerference for the spin axis of stars in out galaxy to be aligned with the spin axis of the galaxy as a whole. I'd expect that if magnetism didn't exist, the tendency would be stronger, masked only by the effects of close encounters between stars, and turbulence within star-forming gas clouds.
Given that magnetism does exist, and affects lighter objects like gas and dust more strongly and more quickly than large massive objects like stars, then the extant galactic magnetic field will also have an affect, of course. Combining the two effects might, perhaps produce the results seen.
broski do you have videos on your playlist about binary solar systems?
What's creating such large magnetic fields? Given magnetic fields drop off with an inverse cube law, does that mean there's something sustaining them?
totally confirms, everything is connected..., once everyone realizes we're all ONE! .. peace will come to this planet , thank you for bringing this out and into the forefront 🤗
@@Jay-cf6dz Definitely those two brain cells you have are not connected, troll.
Imagine if Joe Rogan invited Anton to his podcast. Man that would be awesome
Those nebular were hit by a large mass travelling at close to the speed of light that's my guess, and something in that direct is throwing them
Oh, my... this is one of them that's gonna have the loony-tuners flocking in by the dozen to smear their pseudoscience all over the place, and call it brilliance. 😂 Ah, but that's not a you-problem, it's a them-problem.
You put out such excellent work, you Wonderful Person, you. We love you! Always stay wonderful, Anton!
❤❤
Binary systems that are aligned with the galactic plane while forming tend to be spaced farther apart because of the angular momentum of our galaxy's rotation. No magnetic field needed.
Why aren't the lobes facing away from the galaxy longer than the lobes facing inward?
have any of you ever heard of cymatics? this concept reminds me of how sound waves can organize particulate matter into amazing geometric shapes. would love to discuss! cheers from New Orleans
*Whether on the macro or micro scale, where there are magnetic fields, there either is, or were, electrical currents.*