This comment should be in the dictionary next to ‘projection’. Hijab is an ignoramus of the highest order whose entire career is based on the fact that there are hordes of even dumber half-wits like yourself that egg him on.
@@s_h136 it’s the dumbest thing to say in your eyes because you know you can’t prove liberalism is true so therefore you cannot tell someone to follow liberalism values or that person is wrong. It’s literally impossible and it’s baseless. You have no moral anchor to judge between and it’s completely 100 percent subjective
@@ramalam1988 Of course you can't empirically prove liberalism but there's no requirment for that since liberalism is just a conceptual view and not a claim (other than your religion which makes up childish claims about an almighty wizard in the sky without any empirical basis). Liberalism is a socio-political concept and personal mindset. "Prove me that liberalism is true" is like saying "prove me that conservatism is true" or "prove me that democracy is true". Hijab does nothing than taking some talking points and doing silly mental gymnastics with it yet his followers think he's some sort of a genuis 😂
@@s_h136 the whole point of him bringing it up is because people say why you get offended when you make fun of the prophet Mohammed and draw him. It’s freedom of speech. That’s your definition of freedom of speech based on your liberal values which you hold to be some kind of truth. A Muslim has every right to get offended when you make fun of an important figure in the Islamic belief of over 1.8 billion people. I don’t really care that you want to believe in liberalism. We believe Islam is the truth and according to our values , freedom of speech has its limitations. If you want to go ahead and start claiming Muslims need to be in line with liberalism, then yes you need to first prove that liberalism has some kind of weight or truth to it for us to follow it. You can’t force liberalism views on the world which the west tries to do otherwise your called backwards or medieval etc. It’s the west that tries to put these values as some kind of dominant ideology over others when they have no proof or moral anchor to stand on. It’s nothing more than baseless nonsense. At least with Muslims we believe in an objective moral way of life. Your way of life is 100 percent subjective. Why ? You have no moral anchor to stand on. As Muslims our anchor is that the Quran is the word of the creator of everything that exists so he has the right to legislate for his creation unlike your values in which you think human beings can dictate the moral values of another human being. You think you have the higher moral ground when you can’t even demonstrate how it is because you have no anchor. That’s what Mohammed hijab is trying to say. I don’t care if you don’t believe in Islam or God. That’s not the point. The point is who are you to say someone else is morally wrong and the other is right ? Who is the west to dictate what the East should and shouldn’t do in terms of morality. You have to prove your morality is true first in order for you to do that.
God I cant stand muslims moving to my chrisitan western countries why dont you people move back to your islamic countries forever and never ever come back ever
He’s basically saying you can’t judge a religion morally through a microscope which is not objectively accurate. Liberalism is based on the presupposition that it is indeed objectively true. So don’t let people make you feel inhuman immoral or just dumb because the fact of the matter is we’re in the same boat
liberalism Don't Have The Divine Scale To Measure What's Wrong And What's Right. It Only Based On Humans Assumption. The Liberals Are Like The One Who Don't Know What's Right And What's Wrong They Only Do Argument Based On Assumption. While The Don't Know Their Assumption Don't Have Pillar's They're Assuming That What They Are Calling Is Inhumane , Injustice And Immorality Actually In Reality They Are The One Who Are Inhumane, Unjust, And Immoral But They Perceive Not.
@@sm3675 Liberalism is not a belief. It is a political system. But aside from that. If liberalism was so faulty, then why are so many people flocking to the western world to seek a better life?
I love this and learned so muchbthank you brother just stung a bit when you kept saying the wite man bit I understood what you meant. Mashallah may Allah bless and reward u
We are born free, in thought, in expression, in choosing what we want and many things. And bro we need to see everything through the light of Quran and sunnah (with its context) to every ism and ideology. If anything things goes against it tht will not be accepted. As simple as it is.
Lol so you don’t accept different sects of Islam Sunni Shia Ahmediya, LGBTQ muslims. They all are Muslims although in traditional sense they aren’t. Instability in Middle East is bc you put others down by saying they aren’t Muslim enough. It’s sad bc liberalism isn’t about adopting western ideas only rather seeking the subjective truth of Islam. Traditionally 5 times prayer is a must and it’s a major sin if you are not consistent. Today most of us don’t need to remind ourselves constantly of God we know how to live for ourselves and some pray 2 times a day or only on fridays and things like that. This can feel accepted only if you accept liberalism.
People must follow Islam by there own choice. Not by fear or force of another human. You cannot force someone to love you it must come from there own free will
Islam Not Forced Any Non-Muslim To Follow Islam But Muslims Should Follow Muslim Don't Have Choice Because It's Command's And If Allah (SWT) Command Then Matter Is Closed.
Getting personally upset when someone draws a cartoon of the Prophet PBUH is one thing. But getting upset to the point of becoming violent is clearly against the Deen of our Prophet pbuh. There is nothing too great to be forgiven. Do we think we are above Allah? Do we think we have a right to violently abuse his creation because of our own self-righteous egos? Astafhfurullah…
Alhamdullilah for islam. Mange vil ikke se på denne videoen fordi den er lang og har mange vanskelige ord. Men den er så viktig for oss som bor i Europa nå tid. Det er ikke vi som påtvinger folk vårt ideologi. Men det er de som påtvinger liberalisme som ikke har noen grunnlag eller bevis til har virket bedre enn andre samfunnssystemer
There is no end to this, we in Mexico used to have our own believes, a little backwards perhaps brutal too. In every corner of the lovely planet we’re we live, we will always find many different ways to believe in something. All this didn’t use to exist many thousands of years ago, and definitely they shouldn’t now. They only create conflict.
He is definitely making a point here by saying today’s version of liberalism does not have to do anything with the actual idea of being free and independent from government and society. The point is now that western society has dropped the importance of religion for many decades liberalism is doing the best job here. Without this ideology no one knows how the society’ a concept would look like. I as a revert don’t doubt at all that the Islamic law system is the best system if not being abused only for power. But when talking about a society which has rejected religion in general it’s the best way to go. And as I said before contemporary liberalism has I think nothing to do with the origins form. Because I guess in those former days no one would have accepted immoralities we discover to say and which are normal and generally accepted. In the end it depends on what mankind is making out of it- both of religion and political concepts.
So, when debating which is the best political system between these two, the answer is to shift the burden of proof entirely onto liberalism? Kinda disappointed
i think that he is trying to argue from a different angel i mean there are many video of him arguing why islam is better but here he is arguing from epistemological basis so no need to be disappointed
Rokib Miah Islam is objective? 😂 By what measure? I’m curious to discover the objectivity of Islam or any religion for that matter. I didn’t know a system based on faith could be objective. Maybe I do not know the meaning of “objective,” and I am most certainly open to learning
Honor, you made a lot of points there and it sounds like yes, without exception (including barbarism), if god says so it must be. What exactly is your definition of liberalism though?
Hareecio Nelson who r u? If u don’t want to follow any religion that’s your life. We have nothing to apologize for😂😂 u claim not to follow a god well the government is your god in that case
@@ibrahimabdoullah5906 1) In UK we regularly take the piss out of our government. 2) a government can be held accountable by the people, even replaced. 3) The government exists. There is an island in the pacific where the people worship Prince Phillip (Queen Elizabeth's husband). Sounds ridiculous, but at least they've met Prince Philip when he visited them.
@@ibrahimabdoullah5906 The same accountability and ability to criticise is non existant in a theocracy. Religion is set in stone, fixed. Democracy is (at least in theory) adaptable
@@IslamNetEnglish This was posted 10 months ago on Hijab's channel: ruclips.net/video/2Dyzc282ZFE/видео.html The background is quite unique. That's probably why I recognized it.
Posing islam vs liberalism on two extreme side of the argument is not a good idea. One can argue there are plenty of aspects in sharia that are liberal; as long as it does not result ensue in chaos and turmoil in the society.
You are still assuming a side to be default in this case. "There are parts in Sharia that are liberal" Could be there are parts in liberalism that are Shari'i.
There won't be a revolution in our countries. You keep talking that shit the authorities will track you down and kick you out. Keep Islam out of our way of life.
As a Muslim, it pains me to say that none of the arguments presented in this video seem very convincing. The beauty of liberalism or any philosophy for that matter, is that it does not claim to be perfect. The First Principles do not hold the same level of importance in liberalism as they do in Islam. This is because, by virtue of being a man-made creed, there is no pretense of divine perfection. Every non-religious idea has gone through multiple revisions and will keep on going through such revisions until we cease to exist. As for the apparent incompatibility of Islam with the ideas of Liberalism, I feel that the Muslims of the Golden Age would beg to differ. I think there is good reason to believe that Liberalism might well have evolved within the Muslim World had the Mutazilites won the ideological battle with the Asharis. Peace
There was no logic in any of your claims based on liberalism. Your understanding and claims didn’t support in any arguments that you provided. There belief is no belief, therefore there is no base. And if there belief is ‘you do what ever you please’ then where is this pleasure pleasantly pleasant, is my belief not pleasantly to me? There is no base of rule to measure, and so if their liberalism is only required to them, then the liberalism is no more a liberalism. You see, it doesn't make sense Had no base. So then then prove it to us! If not Please let the knowledgeable take this part of the circus. You logic is tripping. Can you try again 🧐
Lol what a self refuting comment, if you believe that there is no objectivity, it's dumb as fck to sya something is compatible or should be reformed or any of that sort, because you have no base to prove why it should done like that. Even more so foolish to say mutazilliyes won to asharis. Complete ignorance of history mixed with interiority complex and intellectual colonisation by West.
Can someone justify why depicting the face of Prophet Muhammad is forbidden in Islam? 124,000 prophets have come over time, including Moses, Jesus and Muhammad (MPBUT) but none of them made a big deal about their own appearance (s) but primarily focused on the message that each of them was sent to convey, from Allah. While I agree that disrespectful cartoons of the prophet(s) should be forbidden, I would appreciate pointers as to what legitimizes the current ban.
Those who practice liberalism are volunteer base on their feeling, not by their critical thinking, therefore they able to practice liberalism but never able to make other people that use their mind to join them..
It all depends were you were born, Islam was never a part of the west, just like many other ways of lifestyle weren’t either. That’s the reason why science will always be in a constant battle with the faith’s of the whole planet. I hate to be in conflict against others because of what they believe, I rather say some this like… if it’s convincing to believe and follow what you believe in, it will be up to me to willingly accept such way of life. But because of the brutal conflicts in either faiths and obviously for that we have the history to look into to know how hard it is to come to greets.
I believe He is conflating classical liberalism with modern leftism, which are entirely different. Modern leftism is clearly a permutation of Marxism and Collectivism. For instance, he mentions that liberals are allies of LGBTQ. He’s talking about modern leftists, not classical liberals. In most classical liberal societies, such as in colonial America, homosexuality was a punishable offense. We need to distinguish between classical liberalism and modern leftism. I believe that the former is far more compatible with Islamic values than the latter.
For an Islamic view, the only thing I have against Liberalism and the far-left (and right) is the pressure to exert power on us. "Woke" TV shows like "Cuties" and other shows depict Muslims as weak and oppressed. They want to demean us and desensitized us. In the TV show "Cuties", they actively disgust children and make them do atrocious things. They try to force the lgbt agenda. We as Muslims want peace. We do not demand much.
Agreed. Laizzes faire is also quite misunderstood. No liberal state leaves people totally alone indeed. And in fact, there are so many liberals that have also fought against all kinds of cultural marxism and positive discrimination.
I would agree but I actually think both marxism and fascism emerged once the Judeo Christian matrix which was foundational to the Liberal worldview was lifted, as Hijab says, Locke relies on God's existence a priori to prove natural rights and equality. So, it is possible to be a classical liberal without being a marxist (or fascist) but one has to then accept some kind of theism and accept a version of the Fall which says that we are limited beings who cannot do everything on our own but rely on a higher Source. (Incidentally Darwinism also agrees with this if you view Natural Selection as a kind of fall of man from grace.) Because if you accept materialism, especially if you're a Darwinist, then it is impossible to be an egalitarian and believe in universal humanity, since God may have created us equal, but nature through the struggle for survival made us unequal. The only path for an atheist liberal, due to the is ought problem (we are unequal on a material basis but ought to be treated equal due to metaphysics), is one of two. One can either make equality prescriptive and therefore become some kind of marxist and postmodernist, which abolishes all differences (between rich and poor, man and woman, and all races) in order to achieve natural equality. Or, one can abandon the concept of equality entirely and therefore become some kind of chauvinistic fascist who agrees that the survival of the fittest is the only basis for morality. This is why New Atheism collapsed into the woke and alt right movements 10 years ago.
Did it ever occur to this guy that as we emerged from the harshness of nature with highly circumstantial brain architectures which have always relied on incentivising survival and reproduction, that trying to define a 'grounded' shared social contract -- whether it be based on monotheistic principles of a higher authority, or a utilitarian framework protected under law -- will always be a futile endeavour. The single tenet provided to us through biology is to stay alive long enough to ensure successful duplication/distribution of our genes. In the west it was realised that as people embrace the freedoms and liberties of living in an equal and fair society, they are better able to provide for themselves, their families, and the greater communities in which they live. These are the true pleasures that most people (regardless of religion or country) strive for. So, lo and behold, the most wealthiest, productive countries with generally the highest standards of living, are western countries, as they invested in a system that gave the common man a sense of value and agency. No longer was he constrained to living under the arbitrary rule of some monarch or religious text. He was now able to seek his own destiny and truly live to scrutiny of god and his fellow man. This enabled western society to blossom and newer technologies were invented that created new ways to achieve purpose in this world. Eventually the same rights were extended to both women and men of originally oppressed origins. Women could now choose not to have children and pursue careers, for their own self-serving reasons or to benefit of society, there was no expectation. This social contract comes with many flaws, I will not deny that. However, it's still reasonably young and has improved the quality of life for billions while paving the way for less fortunate societies to grow and prosper. There are still many kinks to work out in regards to capitalism and corporate dominance. There is wealth inequality, substance abuses, many decadent and despondent members of the community. Many of these things could possibly be solve by social engineering in the way of restrictions, censorship, disciplinary action. But these things come at the expense of losing the innovative spirit that Liberalism has afforded the west. This is perhaps the most disheartening outcome I could imagine for our species as we are closer than we have ever been to a free and enlightened society. What an amazing outcome for a species of primates that used to live in huts made of sticks and fought each other with stones.
No it never did, and he’s so full of himself that it never will. He will profit and enjoy all that this very things provide him and will still spread hate
and you still don't dare to debate with Christian prince, you're just an Arabic language school in egypt but prince is a native arabic, he's arrived at an Islamic religious school just to tell the true authenticity of Islam, he never told a lie about Islam but you're hijab use unreasonable reasons to reject the debate with CP, the reason you don't want to debate with CP is because you have a standard for arguing with people, you know CP is more devastating to Islam than david wood but you debate with david wood who can't speak Arabic, you're afraid debate with CP because CP is fluent in Arabic, because of that you prefer debates with david wood, but with david wood alone you lose especially with CP, surely you will be even more embarrassed to be seen by people when debating with CP
Have you seen the mess he was debating Alex O’Connor? He cheated and even edited in after denying access to the video to the one he was debating after having promising that... this dude has no shame and no morals no matter what religion or whatever he believes in
if this hijab dares to debate with CP you continue to prove Islam is the true religion then people will believe in Islam, imagine how many Muslims moved to Christianity because of CP, if you beat CP imagine how many Christians would move to Islam, imagine what God would Give it to you if you can beat CP on RUclips, there must be more than 72 virgins and 8000 boys who will allah give if you can win debates with CP, CP is always online on RUclips but you don't dare to want a debate with CP, debate only need a mouth, so don't use the reason you have to open debate, indeed you want a debate with his face, you debate with his mouth ... his voice is not face, try to be male and challenge CP.
the hijab only talks about other people's books to justify Islam, he doesn't want to talk about his moral morals that can be considered abnormal, only talks about theories about other people's books, you are suitable to be a speaker for people who have mental illness problems, what is the essence of what you are talk on the stand, nothing's important, you're just fooling yourself
Congratulations you just listened to a talk of 34min and did not understand even the basis of his answer....it's not he does not want to talk about morals, its the questions being asked are themselves falacious. If you can't understand a clear speech like this then am sorry, you're just not smart enough
Why not, the stupid answer. For a hurt by a drawing. If atheist write and draw about Christian God. Do people want to kill that person or call for that person death. You try to compare is sad. God has power to do what ever. But some how he needs you to fight his battle. Dont pretend to fight for God, when clearly your ego and arrogant to know God.
you hijab mostly talk theory, no quality at all your theory. prove Islam is the only true religion with CP, we see if you are able to debate with CP, don't bring your way of speaking your theory in debate, talk based on religion and teachings of your prophet, we will see who will be embarrassed at the end of the debate. you are only a child but want to look very learned in the face of others, try with CP if you are male, prove to the Islamic world the most correct religion. shave off your beard gandalf. be a man and challenge CP on youtube, right if you think your religion is the truth you have nothing to fear, just prove that you can win debates with CP, ok.
"They will wrap their ideology in the garment of rationality!!" --M.Hijab
This comment should be in the dictionary next to ‘projection’. Hijab is an ignoramus of the highest order whose entire career is based on the fact that there are hordes of even dumber half-wits like yourself that egg him on.
"They will wrap their ideology in the garment of rationality!!"
And how ironic that that is literally the mantra of "faith".
@@flashoftruth So you’re saying liberalism is also a faith right?
@@arkaazizul6673 That is not at all what I said, I said your comment was ironic because that is exactly what theists do.
🧒👉 The sunni Taqiyya part 3 muhammad hijab.
"Prove to me that liberalism is true" love it!
I love how you guys literally think that this is a billiant line when in reality it‘s the dumbest fucking thing to say 😂
@@s_h136 ad hominem attacks. listen budy ya aint got nothin logical 2 say then maybe da best thing to do is simply stfu! just sayin
@@s_h136 it’s the dumbest thing to say in your eyes because you know you can’t prove liberalism is true so therefore you cannot tell someone to follow liberalism values or that person is wrong.
It’s literally impossible and it’s baseless. You have no moral anchor to judge between and it’s completely 100 percent subjective
@@ramalam1988
Of course you can't empirically prove liberalism but there's no requirment for that since liberalism is just a conceptual view and not a claim (other than your religion which makes up childish claims about an almighty wizard in the sky without any empirical basis). Liberalism is a socio-political concept and personal mindset. "Prove me that liberalism is true" is like saying "prove me that conservatism is true" or "prove me that democracy is true". Hijab does nothing than taking some talking points and doing silly mental gymnastics with it yet his followers think he's some sort of a genuis 😂
@@s_h136 the whole point of him bringing it up is because people say why you get offended when you make fun of the prophet Mohammed and draw him. It’s freedom of speech. That’s your definition of freedom of speech based on your liberal values which you hold to be some kind of truth. A Muslim has every right to get offended when you make fun of an important figure in the Islamic belief of over 1.8 billion people.
I don’t really care that you want to believe in liberalism. We believe Islam is the truth and according to our values , freedom of speech has its limitations. If you want to go ahead and start claiming Muslims need to be in line with liberalism, then yes you need to first prove that liberalism has some kind of weight or truth to it for us to follow it. You can’t force liberalism views on the world which the west tries to do otherwise your called backwards or medieval etc.
It’s the west that tries to put these values as some kind of dominant ideology over others when they have no proof or moral anchor to stand on. It’s nothing more than baseless nonsense. At least with Muslims we believe in an objective moral way of life. Your way of life is 100 percent subjective. Why ? You have no moral anchor to stand on. As Muslims our anchor is that the Quran is the word of the creator of everything that exists so he has the right to legislate for his creation unlike your values in which you think human beings can dictate the moral values of another human being. You think you have the higher moral ground when you can’t even demonstrate how it is because you have no anchor. That’s what Mohammed hijab is trying to say. I don’t care if you don’t believe in Islam or God. That’s not the point. The point is who are you to say someone else is morally wrong and the other is right ? Who is the west to dictate what the East should and shouldn’t do in terms of morality. You have to prove your morality is true first in order for you to do that.
Alhamdulillah, we need more young brothers like hijab.
no
@@khalidmughal3361 Yes
God I cant stand muslims moving to my chrisitan western countries why dont you people move back to your islamic countries forever and never ever come back ever
@@davidt8087 Christian Western? LOL NOW IS ATHEIST PIECE OF LIAR
@@davidt8087 idk maybe cuz these western counties be attacking our people unjustly🤷🏾♂️
I love the wide terminology that brother Mohammed has mashaallah may Allah make him a blessing for Islam and Muslims
He’s basically saying you can’t judge a religion morally through a microscope which is not objectively accurate. Liberalism is based on the presupposition that it is indeed objectively true. So don’t let people make you feel inhuman immoral or just dumb because the fact of the matter is we’re in the same boat
You nailed it bro. Thanks!
liberalism Don't Have The Divine Scale To Measure What's Wrong And What's Right. It Only Based On Humans Assumption. The Liberals Are Like The One Who Don't Know What's Right And What's Wrong They Only Do Argument Based On Assumption. While The Don't Know Their Assumption Don't Have Pillar's
They're Assuming That What They Are Calling Is Inhumane , Injustice And Immorality Actually In Reality They Are The One Who Are Inhumane, Unjust, And Immoral But They Perceive Not.
Liberalism is based on the presupposition that it is indeed objectively true. can you elaborate???
@@realgamer5636 Hijab elaborated this in half an hour discussion.
Prove to me that liberalism is true!!
Sounds like Dr Mohammad Hijab. Very knowledgeable brother Mashallah
This man really just singlehandedly shattered the entire Western liberalism belief
Liberalism is not a belief.
@@gregthayer2347 Liberalism is a political belief. It's a very faulty belief.
@@sm3675 Liberalism is not a belief. It is a political system. But aside from that. If liberalism was so faulty, then why are so many people flocking to the western world to seek a better life?
@@gregthayer2347 Because they don't know the reality of this, I guess.
@@gregthayer2347 maybe it has something to do with the western countries inciting wars and colonizing there countries for the centuries
The most underrated talk ever 🔥
Only to the undereducated.
I love this and learned so muchbthank you brother just stung a bit when you kept saying the wite man bit I understood what you meant. Mashallah may Allah bless and reward u
Oh my god!!! This is the perfect answer i have been searching...!!! May Allah bless you hijab
Massive respect to Mohammed Hijab!!!!!!!.
P.S.- I'm not a Muslim.
We are born free, in thought, in expression, in choosing what we want and many things. And bro we need to see everything through the light of Quran and sunnah (with its context) to every ism and ideology. If anything things goes against it tht will not be accepted. As simple as it is.
Prove to me librelaism is true
@@hassanmehmood9503 read my comment properly you misunderstood me. After reading do not extract yr ideas from the writing of writer
@@adeebfeeroz3434 bro I didn't even read your comment I was just joking because mh says it again and again 😅
@@hassanmehmood9503 😂😂 misplacing of yr writing. Jst kidding
Lol so you don’t accept different sects of Islam Sunni Shia Ahmediya, LGBTQ muslims. They all are Muslims although in traditional sense they aren’t. Instability in Middle East is bc you put others down by saying they aren’t Muslim enough. It’s sad bc liberalism isn’t about adopting western ideas only rather seeking the subjective truth of Islam.
Traditionally 5 times prayer is a must and it’s a major sin if you are not consistent. Today most of us don’t need to remind ourselves constantly of God we know how to live for ourselves and some pray 2 times a day or only on fridays and things like that. This can feel accepted only if you accept liberalism.
May Allah guide all non muslims to islam ameen
Well done, my brother! We are proud of you 👏
this should be on national television
May Allah subhanahoo wa tala protect you brother Hijab. Ameen
People must follow Islam by there own choice. Not by fear or force of another human. You cannot force someone to love you it must come from there own free will
Islam Not Forced Any Non-Muslim To Follow Islam But Muslims Should Follow Muslim Don't Have Choice Because It's Command's And If Allah (SWT) Command Then Matter Is Closed.
Came from smile to Jannah
I don't mostly understand what muhammad hijab says but I still listen to learn something new.
This is Gold! Sobhan Allah
May Allah (SWTA) protect you and preserve you and keep your intentions pure my dear beloved brother Muhammad Hijab, Allahumma Ameen 🙌🙌🤲🤲
heavy !!! thanks brother
One of the best videos I’ve ever seen on RUclips
Amazing presentation. May Allah preserve you 🤲🏾
May Allah bless you and your way my brother.
Masha Allah eye opening!
Getting personally upset when someone draws a cartoon of the Prophet PBUH is one thing. But getting upset to the point of becoming violent is clearly against the Deen of our Prophet pbuh. There is nothing too great to be forgiven. Do we think we are above Allah? Do we think we have a right to violently abuse his creation because of our own self-righteous egos? Astafhfurullah…
You are wrong. If you are tolerant for everything, you stand for nothing.
Can someone recommend a book that further explains the flaws of liberalism!
What a brilliant lec !
سبحانك اللهم وبحمدك اشهد ان لا اله الا الله محمد رسول الله
Alhamdullilah for islam. Mange vil ikke se på denne videoen fordi den er lang og har mange vanskelige ord. Men den er så viktig for oss som bor i Europa nå tid.
Det er ikke vi som påtvinger folk vårt ideologi. Men det er de som påtvinger liberalisme som ikke har noen grunnlag eller bevis til har virket bedre enn andre samfunnssystemer
Varför talar du i norska eller det danska?
@@zizu1236 hvorfor ikke?
Assa lamu walaikum from Assam, India 🇮🇳
Awesome!
MashaAllah brother Hijab ❤️
❤️ From Bangladesh 🇧🇩
A very bright person he is.
There is no end to this, we in Mexico used to have our own believes, a little backwards perhaps brutal too. In every corner of the lovely planet we’re we live, we will always find many different ways to believe in something. All this didn’t use to exist many thousands of years ago, and definitely they shouldn’t now. They only create conflict.
بارك الله فيك
He is definitely making a point here by saying today’s version of liberalism does not have to do anything with the actual idea of being free and independent from government and society. The point is now that western society has dropped the importance of religion for many decades liberalism is doing the best job here. Without this ideology no one knows how the society’ a concept would look like. I as a revert don’t doubt at all that the Islamic law system is the best system if not being abused only for power. But when talking about a society which has rejected religion in general it’s the best way to go. And as I said before contemporary liberalism has I think nothing to do with the origins form. Because I guess in those former days no one would have accepted immoralities we discover to say and which are normal and generally accepted. In the end it depends on what mankind is making out of it- both of religion and political concepts.
Incredible. Mashaallah
My man! You're are a godsent
Are those 77 dislikes from the liberals 😂😂
Are there any good books relating to this?
So what's the alternative to liberalism? If it's Islam how come Hijab not promoting Islamic government?
Very good lecture.
So, when debating which is the best political system between these two, the answer is to shift the burden of proof entirely onto liberalism? Kinda disappointed
i think that he is trying to argue from a different angel i mean there are many video of him arguing why islam is better
but here he is arguing from epistemological basis
so no need to be disappointed
ahmad, your response doesn’t actually address my main point though, my first sentence
Rokib Miah Islam is objective? 😂 By what measure? I’m curious to discover the objectivity of Islam or any religion for that matter. I didn’t know a system based on faith could be objective. Maybe I do not know the meaning of “objective,” and I am most certainly open to learning
Rokib Miah, are you saying that, without exception, any moral dictates that come from god is the perfect way?
Honor, you made a lot of points there and it sounds like yes, without exception (including barbarism), if god says so it must be. What exactly is your definition of liberalism though?
Hijab is a Brilliant Lion for Islam
20:05 that's true af 💔💔
All the religions have some apologising to do before they start clearing their throats to tell me how to live my life.
Hareecio Nelson who r u? If u don’t want to follow any religion that’s your life. We have nothing to apologize for😂😂 u claim not to follow a god well the government is your god in that case
@@ibrahimabdoullah5906
1) In UK we regularly take the piss out of our government.
2) a government can be held accountable by the people, even replaced.
3) The government exists. There is an island in the pacific where the people worship Prince Phillip (Queen Elizabeth's husband). Sounds ridiculous, but at least they've met Prince Philip when he visited them.
Hareecio Nelson I’m from the uk aswell, the government is a joke especially in the pandemic😂😂
@@ibrahimabdoullah5906 The same accountability and ability to criticise is non existant in a theocracy.
Religion is set in stone, fixed. Democracy is (at least in theory) adaptable
Is this a repost (from Turkey I believe) or is it new?
No, this was filmed here in our Peace Conference in Norway.
@@IslamNetEnglish Jazak'Allahu khairan. I'll watch it in sha Allah.
May Allah bless you for your efforts!
@@IslamNetEnglish This was posted 10 months ago on Hijab's channel: ruclips.net/video/2Dyzc282ZFE/видео.html
The background is quite unique. That's probably why I recognized it.
Masha Allah
Allah Akbar 💪💪💪
Posing islam vs liberalism on two extreme side of the argument is not a good idea. One can argue there are plenty of aspects in sharia that are liberal; as long as it does not result ensue in chaos and turmoil in the society.
You are still assuming a side to be default in this case.
"There are parts in Sharia that are liberal" Could be there are parts in liberalism that are Shari'i.
Wheres the video on democracy?
This is it. This is the spark of revolution.
There won't be a revolution in our countries. You keep talking that shit the authorities will track you down and kick you out. Keep Islam out of our way of life.
As a Muslim, it pains me to say that none of the arguments presented in this video seem very convincing. The beauty of liberalism or any philosophy for that matter, is that it does not claim to be perfect. The First Principles do not hold the same level of importance in liberalism as they do in Islam. This is because, by virtue of being a man-made creed, there is no pretense of divine perfection. Every non-religious idea has gone through multiple revisions and will keep on going through such revisions until we cease to exist. As for the apparent incompatibility of Islam with the ideas of Liberalism, I feel that the Muslims of the Golden Age would beg to differ. I think there is good reason to believe that Liberalism might well have evolved within the Muslim World had the Mutazilites won the ideological battle with the Asharis. Peace
And you’re following Abu Layth. Makes sense why you’re bluffing! 😂
There was no logic in any of your claims based on liberalism. Your understanding and claims didn’t support in any arguments that you provided.
There belief is no belief, therefore there is no base.
And if there belief is ‘you do what ever you please’ then where is this pleasure pleasantly pleasant, is my belief not pleasantly to me? There is no base of rule to measure, and so if their liberalism is only required to them, then the liberalism is no more a liberalism.
You see, it doesn't make sense Had no base.
So then then prove it to us! If not
Please let the knowledgeable take this part of the circus.
You logic is tripping.
Can you try again 🧐
Lol what a self refuting comment, if you believe that there is no objectivity, it's dumb as fck to sya something is compatible or should be reformed or any of that sort, because you have no base to prove why it should done like that.
Even more so foolish to say mutazilliyes won to asharis. Complete ignorance of history mixed with interiority complex and intellectual colonisation by West.
Économic libéralisme we meant about liberalisme
Great talk 👏 mashallah
Can someone justify why depicting the face of Prophet Muhammad is forbidden in Islam? 124,000 prophets have come over time, including Moses, Jesus and Muhammad (MPBUT) but none of them made a big deal about their own appearance (s) but primarily focused on the message that each of them was sent to convey, from Allah. While I agree that disrespectful cartoons of the prophet(s) should be forbidden, I would appreciate pointers as to what legitimizes the current ban.
Those who practice liberalism are volunteer base on their feeling, not by their critical thinking, therefore they able to practice liberalism but never able to make other people that use their mind to join them..
Only liberal societies progress while conservatives loose. Liberals means being happy. It doesnt mean that we should stop praying.
Conservatism and liberalism are much more alike than people like to believe
Walahi , this guy , I would have voted , to become , king, a wise king ,
24:13 Best Part!
Allah Akbar!!
29:55 100%
👍 ❤️
It all depends were you were born, Islam was never a part of the west, just like many other ways of lifestyle weren’t either. That’s the reason why science will always be in a constant battle with the faith’s of the whole planet. I hate to be in conflict against others because of what they believe, I rather say some this like… if it’s convincing to believe and follow what you believe in, it will be up to me to willingly accept such way of life. But because of the brutal conflicts in either faiths and obviously for that we have the history to look into to know how hard it is to come to greets.
I believe He is conflating classical liberalism with modern leftism, which are entirely different. Modern leftism is clearly a permutation of Marxism and Collectivism.
For instance, he mentions that liberals are allies of LGBTQ. He’s talking about modern leftists, not classical liberals. In most classical liberal societies, such as in colonial America, homosexuality was a punishable offense.
We need to distinguish between classical liberalism and modern leftism. I believe that the former is far more compatible with Islamic values than the latter.
For an Islamic view, the only thing I have against Liberalism and the far-left (and right) is the pressure to exert power on us. "Woke" TV shows like "Cuties" and other shows depict Muslims as weak and oppressed. They want to demean us and desensitized us. In the TV show "Cuties", they actively disgust children and make them do atrocious things. They try to force the lgbt agenda.
We as Muslims want peace. We do not demand much.
Agreed. Laizzes faire is also quite misunderstood. No liberal state leaves people totally alone indeed. And in fact, there are so many liberals that have also fought against all kinds of cultural marxism and positive discrimination.
@@sm3675your beloved prophet was a cuties supporter before it was cool 😂
I would agree but I actually think both marxism and fascism emerged once the Judeo Christian matrix which was foundational to the Liberal worldview was lifted, as Hijab says, Locke relies on God's existence a priori to prove natural rights and equality. So, it is possible to be a classical liberal without being a marxist (or fascist) but one has to then accept some kind of theism and accept a version of the Fall which says that we are limited beings who cannot do everything on our own but rely on a higher Source. (Incidentally Darwinism also agrees with this if you view Natural Selection as a kind of fall of man from grace.) Because if you accept materialism, especially if you're a Darwinist, then it is impossible to be an egalitarian and believe in universal humanity, since God may have created us equal, but nature through the struggle for survival made us unequal. The only path for an atheist liberal, due to the is ought problem (we are unequal on a material basis but ought to be treated equal due to metaphysics), is one of two. One can either make equality prescriptive and therefore become some kind of marxist and postmodernist, which abolishes all differences (between rich and poor, man and woman, and all races) in order to achieve natural equality. Or, one can abandon the concept of equality entirely and therefore become some kind of chauvinistic fascist who agrees that the survival of the fittest is the only basis for morality. This is why New Atheism collapsed into the woke and alt right movements 10 years ago.
❤
Did it ever occur to this guy that as we emerged from the harshness of nature with highly circumstantial brain architectures which have always relied on incentivising survival and reproduction, that trying to define a 'grounded' shared social contract -- whether it be based on monotheistic principles of a higher authority, or a utilitarian framework protected under law -- will always be a futile endeavour. The single tenet provided to us through biology is to stay alive long enough to ensure successful duplication/distribution of our genes.
In the west it was realised that as people embrace the freedoms and liberties of living in an equal and fair society, they are better able to provide for themselves, their families, and the greater communities in which they live. These are the true pleasures that most people (regardless of religion or country) strive for. So, lo and behold, the most wealthiest, productive countries with generally the highest standards of living, are western countries, as they invested in a system that gave the common man a sense of value and agency. No longer was he constrained to living under the arbitrary rule of some monarch or religious text. He was now able to seek his own destiny and truly live to scrutiny of god and his fellow man.
This enabled western society to blossom and newer technologies were invented that created new ways to achieve purpose in this world. Eventually the same rights were extended to both women and men of originally oppressed origins. Women could now choose not to have children and pursue careers, for their own self-serving reasons or to benefit of society, there was no expectation.
This social contract comes with many flaws, I will not deny that. However, it's still reasonably young and has improved the quality of life for billions while paving the way for less fortunate societies to grow and prosper.
There are still many kinks to work out in regards to capitalism and corporate dominance. There is wealth inequality, substance abuses, many decadent and despondent members of the community. Many of these things could possibly be solve by social engineering in the way of restrictions, censorship, disciplinary action. But these things come at the expense of losing the innovative spirit that Liberalism has afforded the west. This is perhaps the most disheartening outcome I could imagine for our species as we are closer than we have ever been to a free and enlightened society. What an amazing outcome for a species of primates that used to live in huts made of sticks and fought each other with stones.
Your comment has so many problems I need to write a book to refute you.. also for some reason your comment terrified me..
@@Hattori604 agreed
No it never did, and he’s so full of himself that it never will. He will profit and enjoy all that this very things provide him and will still spread hate
18:00
אני ימני, ליברלי ואנרכיסט
24:13 Allahu Aqbar
As a Muslim I vote conservative every time!!!
?
👌👌👌👌👌
I highly suggest watching at 1.5x speed. A lot of repetitions and the general style seems to be aimed at 10-13 year olds.
I'm 12 year old
Inshallah many 10 to 13 year olds will listen, understand and agree with Muhammad Hijab.
They are more enlightened than their jesus, Paul, mark
and you still don't dare to debate with Christian prince, you're just an Arabic language school in egypt but prince is a native arabic, he's arrived at an Islamic religious school just to tell the true authenticity of Islam, he never told a lie about Islam but you're hijab use unreasonable reasons to reject the debate with CP, the reason you don't want to debate with CP is because you have a standard for arguing with people, you know CP is more devastating to Islam than david wood but you debate with david wood who can't speak Arabic, you're afraid debate with CP because CP is fluent in Arabic, because of that you prefer debates with david wood, but with david wood alone you lose especially with CP, surely you will be even more embarrassed to be seen by people when debating with CP
Have you seen the mess he was debating Alex O’Connor? He cheated and even edited in after denying access to the video to the one he was debating after having promising that... this dude has no shame and no morals no matter what religion or whatever he believes in
if this hijab dares to debate with CP you continue to prove Islam is the true religion then people will believe in Islam, imagine how many Muslims moved to Christianity because of CP, if you beat CP imagine how many Christians would move to Islam, imagine what God would Give it to you if you can beat CP on RUclips, there must be more than 72 virgins and 8000 boys who will allah give if you can win debates with CP, CP is always online on RUclips but you don't dare to want a debate with CP, debate only need a mouth, so don't use the reason you have to open debate, indeed you want a debate with his face, you debate with his mouth ... his voice is not face, try to be male and challenge CP.
Hijabs understanding of liberalism is extremely poor.
How liberalism can be true or false? Logically such a statement makes no sense. And the whole lecture is a wishful thinking.
Lol 😂 my man!
Then why should we accept it?
This guy is a joke
Stay mad
Made a claim. Now back it up with evidence.
Alright Cohen.
Post your nose.
the hijab only talks about other people's books to justify Islam, he doesn't want to talk about his moral morals that can be considered abnormal, only talks about theories about other people's books, you are suitable to be a speaker for people who have mental illness problems, what is the essence of what you are talk on the stand, nothing's important, you're just fooling yourself
Congratulations you just listened to a talk of 34min and did not understand even the basis of his answer....it's not he does not want to talk about morals, its the questions being asked are themselves falacious.
If you can't understand a clear speech like this then am sorry, you're just not smart enough
I believe you are a sad man and surely not smart enough to understand this. We rather have a perfect religion. Alhamdulilah
Why not, the stupid answer. For a hurt by a drawing. If atheist write and draw about Christian God. Do people want to kill that person or call for that person death. You try to compare is sad. God has power to do what ever. But some how he needs you to fight his battle. Dont pretend to fight for God, when clearly your ego and arrogant to know God.
🤡 🤡🤡🤡
If you are tolerant for everything you stand for nothing.
you hijab mostly talk theory, no quality at all your theory. prove Islam is the only true religion with CP, we see if you are able to debate with CP, don't bring your way of speaking your theory in debate, talk based on religion and teachings of your prophet, we will see who will be embarrassed at the end of the debate. you are only a child but want to look very learned in the face of others, try with CP if you are male, prove to the Islamic world the most correct religion. shave off your beard gandalf. be a man and challenge CP on youtube, right if you think your religion is the truth you have nothing to fear, just prove that you can win debates with CP, ok.
Amazing presentation. May Allah preserve you 🤲🏾