CNN's Danny Cevallos explains the process in which the US court system is able to overturn laws and executive orders implemented by Congress and the President.
@John Doe The Federalist Papers were essays that expressed arguments in favor of ratifying the Constitution when we were transitioning from the Articles of Confederation. Simply dismissing our founding father’s arguments and intents for the Constitution in the form of the Federalist Papers is not exactly the right argument to make.
@John Doe You are absolutely correct, and Chief Justice John Marshall also made this very same point of not over relying on the Federalist Papers for jurisprudence. Humbly accept my defeat.
Me after turning on caption it said
CAPTIONS ARE ON THE WAY
I gotta do this for school
Thank you so much for this video! :)
To do this day, captions are on the way....
Still
There is no love on this video!!!!!🤣
CNN should get a "judicial" treatment from a peoples court.
Why no captions???
Judicial review is not in the constitution.
MinecraftNow according to the Supreme Court.
it is deadass supported by the constitution as said by hamilton in federalist 78 bitch
@John Doe The Federalist Papers were essays that expressed arguments in favor of ratifying the Constitution when we were transitioning from the Articles of Confederation. Simply dismissing our founding father’s arguments and intents for the Constitution in the form of the Federalist Papers is not exactly the right argument to make.
@John Doe You are absolutely correct, and Chief Justice John Marshall also made this very same point of not over relying on the Federalist Papers for jurisprudence. Humbly accept my defeat.
Jurisprudence yes. See Marbury versus Madison
Judicial review is not in the constitution
Jurisprudence yes. See Marbury versus Madison