Si Congressman Mark Cojuangco lang po namin naramdaman ang pagmamahal niya bilang isang Congressman sa aming lalawigan ng Pangasinan... Mabuhay po kayo and God bless always po Congressman Mark Cojuangco❤❤❤
No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste. Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’ Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange. If you replace the capacity of a nuclear power plant for example by the capacity of a coal power plant, the price will not change because it is still the natural gas power plant being the most expensive one and deciding about the price. This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste. Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’ Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange. If you replace the capacity of a nuclear power plant for example by the capacity of a coal power plant, the price will not change because it is still the natural gas power plant being the most expensive one and deciding about the price. This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
Indeed the narrative should be changed. There is not only a practical, but a cheap and safe electric power. It is sustainable and renewable as was mentioned. Go for the nuclear path of electric power production. Mr. Cojuangco you are an asset to the Phil. economy.
Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste. Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’ Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange. If you replace the capacity of a nuclear power plant for example by the capacity of a coal power plant, the price will not change because it is still the natural gas power plant being the most expensive one and deciding about the price. This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
Mr.Cojuanco is not an asset but a liability because he is first and foremost a businessman. Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’ Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
He is first and foremost a businessman rather than a politician. Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’ Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste. Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’ Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange. If you replace the capacity of a nuclear power plant for example by the capacity of a coal power plant, the price will not change because it is still the natural gas power plant being the most expensive one and deciding about the price. This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
yes, geothermal probably is safer but our geothermal resources is very limited, umaasa lang tayo sa nature. Filipinos want less expensive electricity then Nuclear energy is the way
@@Xpade sir, you can't just build geothermal plant as much as you like. pwede lang sa lugar na malakas ang mainit na hot spring, or sa may volcano kung saan located and tectonic plate. therefore you cannot just build as much as you like po
Si Congressman Mark Cojuangco lang po namin naramdaman ang pagmamahal niya bilang isang Congressman sa aming lalawigan ng Pangasinan... Mabuhay po kayo and God bless always po Congressman Mark Cojuangco❤❤❤
we need nuclear right now, and we dont need to fear the risk of it cause we can make it safe..
No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste.
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange.
If you replace the capacity of a nuclear power plant for example by the capacity of a coal power plant, the price will not change because it is still the natural gas power plant being the most expensive one and deciding about the price.
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
This is good news!
Thank you sir cojuangco!
There is no such thing as safe and secure nuclear energy production.
True
Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste.
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange.
If you replace the capacity of a nuclear power plant for example by the capacity of a coal power plant, the price will not change because it is still the natural gas power plant being the most expensive one and deciding about the price.
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
Primo Mark
Indeed the narrative should be changed. There is not only a practical, but a cheap and safe electric power. It is sustainable and renewable as was mentioned. Go for the nuclear path of electric power production. Mr. Cojuangco you are an asset to the Phil. economy.
Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste.
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange.
If you replace the capacity of a nuclear power plant for example by the capacity of a coal power plant, the price will not change because it is still the natural gas power plant being the most expensive one and deciding about the price.
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
Mr.Cojuanco is not an asset but a liability because he is first and foremost a businessman. Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange
The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
sayang ang interview
Ama namin. The background noice! 😅
It means danger of nuclear reactor plant
i like this congressman….he has done research and is very enthusiastic about nuclear energy
He is first and foremost a businessman rather than a politician. Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange
The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste.
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange.
If you replace the capacity of a nuclear power plant for example by the capacity of a coal power plant, the price will not change because it is still the natural gas power plant being the most expensive one and deciding about the price.
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
This guy is here again as in BNPP....Watch out...Why not ask a panel of experts from those who KNOWS TEC HNICALLY AND NOT POLITICALLY.....😂😂😂😂
Correct
Geothermal Energy is better, safer, more economical and the environmental risk is way way below posed by nuclear power plant
dont be ignorant. Nuclear is more secure.
@@eegt628 You are the ignorant -FUKUSHIMA Power plant
yes, geothermal probably is safer but our geothermal resources is very limited, umaasa lang tayo sa nature. Filipinos want less expensive electricity then Nuclear energy is the way
yeah but you need to build more of geothermal than nuclear to sustain the country, not efficient
@@Xpade sir, you can't just build geothermal plant as much as you like. pwede lang sa lugar na malakas ang mainit na hot spring, or sa may volcano kung saan located and tectonic plate. therefore you cannot just build as much as you like po