My sources for this video: 1. May and Sell (2016), Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History, pp. 1 2 . May and Sell (2016), Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History, pp. 52 3. Kurz (2023), Brunelleschi and Galilei: Super-Early Patents in Florence and Venice 4. May and Sell (2016), Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History, pp. 76 5 . Ochoa and Rose (2002), The Anti-Monopoly Origins of the Patent and Copyright Clause pp. 677 6. May and Sell (2016), Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History, pp. 83 7. May and Sell (2016), Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History, pp. 91-93 8. Hesse (2002), “The Rise of Intellectual Property” pp. 33 9. May and Sell (2016), Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History, pp. 91 10. Prager (1944), A History of Intellectual Property From 1545 to 1787, pp. 728-729 11. May and Sell (2016), Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History, pp. 97-101 12. May and Sell (2016), Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History, pp. 112-114 13. WIPO Lex Database, wipo.int, Accessed August 2024 13a. (Paris Treaty: www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/treaties/ShowResults?start_year=ANY&end_year=ANY&search_what=C&country_id=ALL&treaty_id=2 ) 13b. (Berne Treaty: www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/treaties/ShowResults?start_year=ANY&end_year=ANY&search_what=C&code=ALL&treaty_id=15 )
What a wonderful mix of serious academic research and great communication skills -we can't help but just listen and learn something new all the time. I'm always looking forward to the next one!
Intellectual property is the defining legal & philosophical development of the last century. So much of what has been produced in the latter era of the internet, the tools that set us abuzz, are merely implementa for the tuling class to more tightly constrain innovation & dissemination of new ideas. The internet had all of the potential for a renaissance, but it was produced in an era of concept hoarding. It's tragic to see our collective output turned into a content mill, & I'm glad to see somebody talking about it. Subscribed & interested in where this is going. I've been somewhat fixated on copyright's effects on culture since the death of napster & the implementation of the DMCA, so this feels like a long time coming.
11:40 What i always understood as "Natural rights" is the previous thought before the French revolution and enlightenment where everyone is free by default because God make you that way and nobody can't tell you otherwise. This is very theorized on the spanish scholastic and their University of Salamanca of the golden century, and until the protestant reform was common on all Catholic countries. So i don't know what you call French revolution concept of human rights "natural rights" when that should be called "positive rights" because not come from nature, but an authority grants you rights. Just curiosity.
My sources for this video:
1. May and Sell (2016), Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History, pp. 1
2 . May and Sell (2016), Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History, pp. 52
3. Kurz (2023), Brunelleschi and Galilei: Super-Early Patents in Florence and Venice
4. May and Sell (2016), Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History, pp. 76
5 . Ochoa and Rose (2002), The Anti-Monopoly Origins of the Patent and Copyright Clause pp. 677
6. May and Sell (2016), Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History, pp. 83
7. May and Sell (2016), Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History, pp. 91-93
8. Hesse (2002), “The Rise of Intellectual Property” pp. 33
9. May and Sell (2016), Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History, pp. 91
10. Prager (1944), A History of Intellectual Property From 1545 to 1787, pp. 728-729
11. May and Sell (2016), Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History, pp. 97-101
12. May and Sell (2016), Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History, pp. 112-114
13. WIPO Lex Database, wipo.int, Accessed August 2024
13a. (Paris Treaty: www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/treaties/ShowResults?start_year=ANY&end_year=ANY&search_what=C&country_id=ALL&treaty_id=2 )
13b. (Berne Treaty: www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/treaties/ShowResults?start_year=ANY&end_year=ANY&search_what=C&code=ALL&treaty_id=15 )
These animations are getting better and better.
What a wonderful mix of serious academic research and great communication skills -we can't help but just listen and learn something new all the time. I'm always looking forward to the next one!
Excellemt video. Very coherently articulated. I'm excited for the next part!
Top tier video, love the animation as well!
This was a great overview with really good animations. I can't wait to see what you have to say about property rights in the modern day.
🚨🚨🚨 zillions must watch 🚨🚨🚨
Intellectual property is the defining legal & philosophical development of the last century. So much of what has been produced in the latter era of the internet, the tools that set us abuzz, are merely implementa for the tuling class to more tightly constrain innovation & dissemination of new ideas.
The internet had all of the potential for a renaissance, but it was produced in an era of concept hoarding. It's tragic to see our collective output turned into a content mill, & I'm glad to see somebody talking about it.
Subscribed & interested in where this is going. I've been somewhat fixated on copyright's effects on culture since the death of napster & the implementation of the DMCA, so this feels like a long time coming.
Thank you for your thoughtful comment! I think you will find the remaining 3 videos of this series very interesting
Really great and interesting video. What software do you use to make the animations?
@@VideoLife146 Just Adobe After Effects. I also use some paid plugins as well, in particular Geolayers3
11:40
What i always understood as "Natural rights" is the previous thought before the French revolution and enlightenment where everyone is free by default because God make you that way and nobody can't tell you otherwise. This is very theorized on the spanish scholastic and their University of Salamanca of the golden century, and until the protestant reform was common on all Catholic countries.
So i don't know what you call French revolution concept of human rights "natural rights" when that should be called "positive rights" because not come from nature, but an authority grants you rights. Just curiosity.