Thanks for the response . I have a further question. I am curious about how to use the modal analysis result of the physical test object combined with the shock response spectrum. Let me give an example, if the natural frequency range of the physical test object is between 200-1000 Hz, is it correct to look at the 200-1000 Hz region of the x-axis on the spectrum?
Thanks for the kind video. I have one question about 5:10 . How to obtain f_n1, f_n2, ..., f_n4? Do we need to implement modal analysis for a given system? Are those the natural frequency of the given system?
@@SimcenterTesting Thanks for the response. I know that f_n1, f_n2, ... are independent variables. But, I am curious about how to use the modal analysis result of the physical test object. For example, if the natural frequency range of the physical test object is between 200-1000 Hz, I wonder if it is only necessary to look at the 200-1000 Hz region of the x-axis on the spectrum?
Great Video! Do you have any recommendations for further learning about SRS and PVSS etc...? Videos, papers, books? I"m working on my own instrumentation startup and would like to learn more about the post processing and data analysis side!
Here are two resources that may help: community.sw.siemens.com/s/article/shock-response-spectrum-srs AND community.sw.siemens.com/s/article/Mission-Synthesis-Seminar
Very good and funny videos bring a great sense of entertainment!
Thanks for the response . I have a further question. I am curious about how to use the modal analysis result of the physical test object combined with the shock response spectrum. Let me give an example, if the natural frequency range of the physical test object is between 200-1000 Hz, is it correct to look at the 200-1000 Hz region of the x-axis on the spectrum?
Thanks for the kind video. I have one question about 5:10 . How to obtain f_n1, f_n2, ..., f_n4? Do we need to implement modal analysis for a given system? Are those the natural frequency of the given system?
Those are the natural frequencies of the given mass-spring sdof systems. They are NOT from a modal analysis of the physical test object.
@@SimcenterTesting Thanks for the response. I know that f_n1, f_n2, ... are independent variables. But, I am curious about how to use the modal analysis result of the physical test object. For example, if the natural frequency range of the physical test object is between 200-1000 Hz, I wonder if it is only necessary to look at the 200-1000 Hz region of the x-axis on the spectrum?
great!
Great Video! Do you have any recommendations for further learning about SRS and PVSS etc...? Videos, papers, books? I"m working on my own instrumentation startup and would like to learn more about the post processing and data analysis side!
Here are two resources that may help: community.sw.siemens.com/s/article/shock-response-spectrum-srs AND community.sw.siemens.com/s/article/Mission-Synthesis-Seminar
14:00 why pseudo velocity is the one to use
Suggest reading section 4.5 of this article: community.sw.siemens.com/s/article/shock-response-spectrum-srs