Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Why is Bond 26 Taking So Long?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 мар 2023
- Could 2023 be the year of no-news news?
Support the channel: / calvindyson
Also follow me on other social media:
/ calvin_dyson
/ calvinmdyson
/ calvindyson
letterboxd.com/calvindyson
Probably the most optimistic view is that Barbara and EON are actually actively working on the script and considering potential directors but they have decided any and all production information will be released through formal publicity channels rather than ad hoc questions on red carpets.
Boy oh boy do I hope you are exactly right.
Your view is much more optimistic than most of us -
And it would be absolutely great if you are right and the rest of us are wrong!
I don't see anything good coming down the road in the Bond world ... Barbara made a woke film (Till) to try and pander to Hollywood and was soundly rejected ... next is full woke black Bond in an attempt to garner favour with the deranged elites. Sad.
The paradox is Amazon don't need to make Bond films. They're one of the most successful corporations in the world with profit margins that make Disney look small fry!
They are in no rush to get a return on their Bond acquisition. And Broccoli knows that. She will drag out the script development and new Bond casting for two years at least I reckon. Bond 26 2026 perhaps?
It's possible MG Wilson will retire before Bond 26 is made. He is 81.
So, that means they will do another story arc oriented for the anthology of new Bond film starring a new actor just like Craig's Bond from Casino Royale to No Time To Die.
My theory is; at this point they are just waiting for Nolan or Denis to become available. Both are directors that see their films all the way through and don’t commit to other films until after their current film is complete. both are releasing a film later this year. Also, both directors will want to be a part of the creative process; writing and casting. Which is why no casting or writing news has released. This is my hope anyway
Agreed. Nolan's certainly free after Openheimer is out this year and he's said if he was ever going to do Bond it would be for a reboot. I agree if he was to do it there is little point in working on something before he's free. Denis Villeneuve is planning on a 3rd Dune film at some point [an adaption of Dune Messiah] so he has that on the horizon but the same thing applies.
Nolan’s bond would be a dream
Most fans would be delighted with a Nolan directed Bond film. Unfortunately, I feel waiting for a superstar director to clear their calendar is a bad business model. Cubby Broccoli would never do it. It was a Producer driven franchise and hiring a director to helm a large scale production was on cog in Broccoli's machine.
My bet is on Nolan for the reboot on Bond, but we won't hear any news until January of 2024 and the films release will be either July or November of 2025.
Tenet was Nolan's 'Bond film'. Nolan is NOT doing a licensed 007 film.
My guess is the producers are taking their time cos they HAVEN'T A CLUE what to do with Bond going forward.
They're probably feeling pressured to get with the times and do a 'progressive Bond', at the same time as some wanting Bond to be traditional.
And the well of creativity is probably a little dry, as well.
I think Christopher Nolan will direct the next film. He is a very high profile director who's always admitted to be interested in the franchise but only if he could reboot it. My prediction is that they are waiting for him to finish Openheimer to really get the next Bond project going.
Nolan is "too big" for Bond and can't write a female character
@@relicreturnsNolan had the potential to revitilize the Bond movie franchise. If Oppenheimer succeeded, so will the 26th Bond film and so on and so forth.
I doubt it’s going to be Nolan but I guess we’ll see
No, I do think there is a catch to choice
There is just no doubt about it at this point-
Barbara and Michael are obviously no longer interested in The James Bond Franchise.
You can just tell very easily by looking at how she speaks about it.
And I guess that’s actually understandable.
She has had Bond front and center for her entire life and it is clear that she has much more high minded” important” projects on her mind now.
But then - she should absolutely sell the rights to someone that IS still excited about the Franchise.
I’m sure there are many many producers and companies who would LOVE to work on James Bond.
This way Michael can happily retire.
And Barbara can just produce her serious projects without being bothered about James Bond questions.
And best of all…
we the fans would get more content!
After all -
5 films in 21 years is just silly.
Heck Cubby did that in 6!!
And they were pretty darn good films too!
To be honest, even if Covid hadn't hit and NTTD had come out in 2020 like it was supposed to, I was always expecting a long gap before Bond 26. Both Craig and Brosnan benefited from a bit of a break before there stints' started and the next Bond will have to set the tone for several films, not just a single one in line with the new actors take on the role. As you say, the picture is distorted by tabloid nonsense suggesting things that are not actually happening [like auditions]. Maybe things will change but at the moment given we're getting films [such as the recent DC slate] being announced for 2025, I suspect 2026 will probably be the time [and it will be 20 years since the last reboot].
To be fair, much of the delay before Brosnan was legal battles. Once they actually set out to make the movie, the process went fairly fast. It's not as if they spent 6 years working on Goldeneye. I certainly do long for the days of Albert R. Broccoli when he could go from Roger Moore to Timothy Dalton in 2 years. Heck, even if they'd spent another year tweaking things and improving things, it would still be lightyears beyond what film studios are capable of today.
@@the_narthex I do think Dalton suffered from being so close to Moore's stint. Given audiences had just had 12 years and 7 films that were generally light in tone from Moore, going so suddenly to a new serious and darker approach probably wasn't what audiences were expecting at the time [hence Licence to Kill being the lowest grossing Bond film adjusted for inflation] so by accident or design, I think having some breathing space did help Brosnan and Craig get a fair chance from audiences who were ready for a new actor/take on the series.
@@jamesatkinsonja 📽 Licence to Kill suffered from the writers' strike the most, followed by a sudden sharp turn towards the hardboiled and the gritty *even from TLD* ,to say nothing of View/Kill, Moonraker, and other lighter Moore fare.
If the Broccolis sell to Amazon, I fear Bond will suffer the same fate that Star Wars did at Disney. At first, I was delighted to get more Star Wars, but they mismanaged it and ran it into the ground. Now, it's not nearly as special. Nevertheless, I'm near desperate for more Bond - be it a film or even some idea of when the IO video game might release. I think your estimate of a release window in autumn/winter 2025 is a good one. I hope it won't prove too optimistic.
Agree. These giants produce garbage. Disney, amazon ruined marvel, star wars, lotr.
Can't wait to see what Disney will do with Dr Who. Mind you with them already making the new one a gay black man I can't see how it'll get any worse.
I don't know why I feel this way, but I think I look forward to someone else taking a shot at Bond. With Bond coming in lame, it gives Amazon a chance to correct course and go back to basics. No continuity needed, just missions after missions after missions. Let Bond be a relic, smoke his cigars, sleep with beautiful women with exotic accents, blow things up, and let him be what he was written as, an arrogant, English Caucasian spy who flirts with Money Penny and his best friend is Felix Leiter. I never cared if Q was gay or not, then Craig's era crowbarred identity politics into Bond and let us know Q has a cat and cooks for his dates and is very gay. You want to tell a Q story, pls go ahead. I signed up to see the OG Alpha male James Bond, not a dad Bond making pancakes for his daughter and cries cause he is sensitive. Give me my Bond back, please and thank you.
Spot on Calvin! I think we're sharing a brain when it comes to the future of the franchise anytime soon. I made similar comments in a recent podcast. Barbara and Michael (like Daniel) seem to have fallen very much out of love with the 007 franchise, despite being the one that actually pays the bills. Fans would do well to settle in and enjoy the legacy of the last 25 films! (PS: 0:27 - Yikes! Did she have a cold?? What's with that voice! 🤣). Another great video Calvin!!
I listened to your latest episode while I was on my lunchbreak walk earlier and I was thinking we have very similar theories about how this is going to play out! LOVED the podcast as always, could listen to you chat for hours, genuinely!
Hey Joe!
Listened to your podcast today also - and I think you may be right.
That very final finale of No Time To Die might have been much more final than we had all thought!
Maybe they were planning on sitting it out for much longer than we were expecting.
( which will make some of us hate that ending even more than we hated it already! lol)
this is such a cynical and bootyblasted take lmao. Why did No Time to Die cause so much seethe lmao
@@Ryuk45 Because it was a mid film at best, and it's clear their love of Bond only extended to Barbara making goo goo eyes at Craig. We need new producers and fresh blood.
@@calvindyson Do you think There is we Don't get another bond movie at all
To be honest, I’d prefer it if Bond movies keep taking their time so they still feel like an event. Rather then end up like Marvel or Star Wars where there’s too much to even care anymore.
Bab's unquenchable thirst for Craig has immobilized her from moving forward with the franchise. This franchise has had a hard or soft reboot multiple times, yet they talk as if this is the first time. I honestly think Babs has lost interest in a Bond post-Craig I love Craig too, but there is a sacred treatment for his Bond legacy that has never been afforded to any other actor since Sean and maybe not even then.
Deffo more than even Sean, for better or worse (I love Craig too btw)
Even WITH Craig in the role, they moved way slower than EON used to move. The fact that he played 007 longer than anyone but has fewer movies that Connery or Moore is sad. He could have at least tied with Connery if they'd made a movie every 3 years. They've simply gotten slower and slower with each film. I DOES soon they are tiring of it, whether they are or not.
Yes, it's understandable that BB feels a particular attachment to Craig not only as a person it seems, but professionnally speaking as well, since she pretty much did put her career on the line by championing him, "the blonde Bond", at a time when the dismissal of the very popular Brosnan raised more than a few eyebrows. Gotta give her credit where credit is due, that was a risky move and it paid off in spades (pun intended). But the idea that "finding a worthy successor to Daniel Craig is such a tough task" is ludicrous; Connery is the undoubtedly the most popular James Bond actor there ever was and even him was recast twice in the space of four years. I'd actually argue that they are adding even more pressure on the shoulders of whoever is going to be Craig's successor by acting this way...
Lads Craig was good in Royale and Quantum ... after that it was diminishing returns ... he also got uglier as he aged.
There are tons of factors in carrying a franchise from generation to generation, not to mention the legalities, economics, and worldwide pandemics that make the job 1000% more difficult. I’m sorry but everyone here makes it sound like picking a new Bond and making a new movie takes 35 minutes and a phone call. For a WHOLE new generation Daniel Craig is their Sean Connery, and you can see plainly how difficult it was to move on from him 50 years ago let alone nowadays when everyone and their mother is screaming on the Internet.
I think the biggest source of delay is that Barb and Mike just don't care anymore. I'm not saying that from a place of bitterness...I genuinely believe that. You can tell they're just...tired and kind of over it, sadly.
I agree, it's fine to not care anymore, but if that's the case then pass it on to someone else. PS cheers for your thoughts once again Calvin!
Gibe rights to James Cameron
She wants to make bond black ... That is what 'Barb' wants her legacy to be ...
@@HEATSEEKER00 Wow...a BLACK BOND...in a REMAKE of LIVE & LET DIE??!!🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
Yeah, you can only reinvent something so many times before you burn out.
The fact that they killed off Bond has made it that much harder. They have to start over completely now and are no doubt overthinking the whole 'modernising Bond for today's audiences' stuff.
A realistic time before we get a new Bond film is about three years and since we have a new Bond game coming soon as well as GoldenEye now being available to play on the Switch, us Bond fans do have some stuff to keep us entertained until more news breaks out.
And if Bond fans are craving for some newer Bond content, we can always make theory videos on how Judi Dench's M is still alive but working on saving the UK money on their insurances.
And if we get really, really desperate for content, I'm sure Calvin can finish off his Top 10 Penelope Smallbone moments.
And yet there hasn't really been any updates on that Bond game since it was announced in November of 2020. So who knows when that is coming?
@@iamskyfall Industry insiders have said the Bond game won’t release until 2025 at the earliest as the studio has another game in the works.
@@dawsynasay4841 There needs to be some kind of update soon otherwise speculation is going to start that the game is cancelled.
M is a meerkat, confirmed
Between 1962 to 1971 they averaged a Bond movie every 2 years. The truth is that modern culture is just not that creative or inventive.
I'm guessing you've seen this by now but Taron Egerton was recently asked if he was interested in playing Bond and he was quoted as saying, "I think they've already got someone, and it's not me."
Who?
I’m posting another comment here because this is a completely different idea. I’d like to do a call back to a wonderful concept you had in a prior video of yours:
Pierce Brosnan has aged very well and I think it would be great if the next Bond film had him as an older Bond that was pulled out of retirement for one last mission. His 007 is obviously older but can get the job done. Look at Sean Connery in The Rock!
This would give Brosnan his sendoff (not necessarily be killed) and people are very used to his 007. It would be a great one-shot film for the next in the series and a fantastic way to reset everything. It would be so much easier for introducing a new Bond in the film after that!
I know the chances of it happening are practically nonexistent, but it’s certainly on my wish list. It was a great idea you had. How incredibly creative and daring.
November Man was pretty much that anyway back in 2014. It does feel like a 'spiritual' conclusion to the Brosnan series given some of the plot points [like a woman from his past called Natalia...]. I hope his appearance in Black Adam-despite the film's underwhelming box office-gets him more character roles in big films again.
Ah no.
Bond is a simple idea. A character with a good story is what they need. It does not need reinventing or going back in time.
A really good Bond movie could be made for $50 million that goes back to Bonds roots. I am sick of the over the top CGI cartoons with depressing middle aged bond story surround by incompetent strong women characters written by several graduates of film school.
I can't see how Bond can continue after NTTD's ending to the Craigonation Street era. I wonder if that's what Barbara Broccoli wants. Her dad started the Bond franchise - and she'll be the one to end it.
No her daughter is going to take over. And her only experience is producing a movie about rape survival.
Spectre and No time to die also had too many cooks in the kitchen aswell and they BB and MG did feel like after the unexpected success of SKYFALL that they needed to try and be at that movies level or exceed expectations, which they sadly kinda didnt.
But as Peter Hunt once said about sequels "thats not always easy "
Skyfall was good but it broke the series.
@@bighands69 well it was popular and made a billion dollars for a good reason man
They haven't had a solid story idea for quite a long time (Spectre was Spectre, and NTTD's plot was built around its ending), and I have argued elsewhere that they should also be recruiting a fresh team of writers, as well as a new cast. If they are doing a full reboot, why not? I'd say 2025 would be optimistic, at the earliest
They could easily produce a Bond movie for $50 million that focuses on Bond he character and a good story.
None of this is complicated really.
Please dear god i hope they don't sell to Amazon. It would just turn into the marvel universe and become diluted. Honestly I'm happy with them holding off on putting off a new bond for a few years. We really got a full story with Craig, and many things have been done with the franchise as a whole. I think it's good to figure out what the future of the franchise is going to be rather than rushing casting or writing and getting something sub-par.
Between bonds there were:
2 years between Connery and Lazenby
4 years between Lazenby and Moore
2 years between Moore and Dalton
6 years between Dalton and Brosnan
4 years between Brosnan and Craig
We're definitely looking at a more extended period between bonds right now, but for such a long running Bond with such a linear story and definitive ending, I personally think that's fine
If I was a betting man, 2027 is the earliest for a new film… seriously, a 2028 release wouldn’t even surprise me. I do think a behind-the-scenes change in guard is happening. I remember well the Dalton to Brosnan and Brosnan to Craig transitions, and general cinematic timelines are even lengthier than they were back then. I’d like to be pleasantly surprised though!
I wonder if one aspect of all this is the ballooning budgets of the last two films. Maybe they're being overly cautious in planning partly because they don't want to make another $300 million movie (before they even get to marketing costs)
Very true! I imagine the budget will be stripped down a bit. I guess they won't be paying the lead quite as much for his first one either so that'll save them a fair bit.
That's a fair point - it's possible that they felt too confident after Skyfall's exceptional box office performance, hence the bigger budget, and that, along with the years-long development hells that came with both Spectre and NTTD and then both films not performing as well as Skyfall did would feel pretty painful. I wouldn't be surprised if Broccoli and Wilson are privately suffering from a creative burnout in part because of how much of a headache it was - and burnout is one of the worst enemies of any creator, speaking as an amateur writer.
@@calvindyson Both Spectre and NTTD budget were inflated with the production issues but as you say salaries will be slashed with mostly new talent.
@@calvindyson I heard Henry Cavill will do it for peanuts. Financial problem solved :)
@@frankb821 He's pretty booked up for the next few years with his current project [a reunion with Guy Ritchie] and Argyll both aiming to start franchises and the Warhammer project he's heading up.
I think a long hiatus can be a good thing. It is better to have the audience hungry for the next film rather than fatigued.
It's kind of refreshing in the era of peak content and endless spinoffs that Bond films are rare events but the downside to that is if you don't like the latest entry it feels agonising waiting for the next one. For some people the last good Bond film was Skyfall and that's 10 years old. The back catalogue is always going to be there but if the Bond franchise is going to survive it EON probably does need to pick up the pace. That being said I don't begrudge Broccoli from wanting to do other creative projects she and Wilson have been working on Bond longer than I've been alive.
True. Star Wars used to be a massive cultural event which dominated the headlines of mainstream press let alone movie news. Now we've gone from 3 year gaps between the trilogy films to 5 films in 5 years [only 1 less than the entire 1977-2015 period] and the streaming shows get no where near the same hype.
In the Connery era Bond movies were on average being released every two years. If they just went back to focusing on the character and good writing they could produce the movies far more quickly at a fraction of the cost.
There was a four year gap between Die Another Day and Casino Royale so if Bond 26 comes out in 2025 a four year gap between No Time To Die and Bond 26 seems reasonable. Also they may be waiting on a director to become available. Christopher Nolan has expressed interest in the past but has stated he would wait until EON was ready to reinvent the character. EON is now in need of a reinvention. There is no script for Bond 26. Nolan writes or co-writes his film's screenplays. Aaron Taylor Johnson has supposedly met with EON. Johnson was in Nolan's Tenet. If EON wants to hire Nolan now is the time.
Aaron would make a good Bond.
NOLAN is NOT a Director for HIRE. His films are very much HIM. Can't see him BUCKLING down to what Babs Broccoli wants. 🤔🤔
Nolan has STATED that he is interested in Bond, but only if he could reinvent it. To me, that implies putting his own personal touch on the project as he did with Batman.
@@RNKFanArt that can be done to great effect. Casino Royal (the one with Daniel Craig, not David Niven), reinvented the franchise without reinventing the character. Same with Nolan's Batman.
Bond does not need some reinvention. It needs to go back to its roots of a character and story driven movie.
These over the top nonsense stories with bond being a family man and having a minority side kick characters is insulting on every level.
One major problem is just that filmmaking has changed completely since Bond’s inception, heck, since even Craig’s first feature and Bond isn’t Marvel. It’s not multiple series of films on an assembly line. Each film needs to be given the right kind of care and gravitas that it deserves, especially when one remembers that this is still a homegrown British product rather than an American franchise. I do think however that it seems as though Barbara and Michael have kind of lost sight of Bond. Broccoli’s moving Eon into different ventures and as good as that it is, it does kind of tell me that her goals are obviously not constrained to Bond and I think a lot of people will disappointed about that. I just think what’s going to happen in the coming years is that we’re going to need some young blood in the franchise. Not entirely, but if Michael G. Wilson is retiring soon and Barbara Broccoli is moving to other pastures, then we need someone else to take over the general direction of the franchise as producer. Someone like a Kevin Feige who could at least keep the ball rolling as Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson move into more of an executive capacity.
I also just want to say, I really don’t want a Christopher Nolan Bond movie. Not that I don’t think it could be good, it’s just that I feel it loses sight of the fact that it’s a BOND movie. It’s not a film by Christopher Nolan. It’s a James Bond film. And every Nolan film is obviously very personal, very him. The series has always fared best with less well known directors like Martin Campbell or Lewis Gilbert. Even Sam Mendes isn’t a massively well known name in non-film circles.
Always nice to hear your opinions and I do appreciated it how you have covered the reasons for the vacuum. I am glad you touched on the 'other projects' at 3:35 as I see so many saying there 'doing nothing'. She's always been busy in the theatre [such as the 'Chitty Chitty Bang Bang' stage show and MacBeth with Daniel Craig on Broadway].
8:08 given it took 3 years for a new Star Wars film to emerge after LucasFilms was sold, it would still take a while as even if Eon aren't doing the reboot, someone else has to plan it and other projects as there isn't anything 'ready to go' [as no writers room is commissioned for example].
If Cubby Broccoli were still in charge, Bond 26 would be filming as we speak. If they haven't even started writing at this point, then it has to just be laziness.
If Cubby was still alive they would be filming Bond 38.
@@arrgghh1555 fax!
Good points Calvin. But I think it's wishful thinking to think that Barbara will pass over the mantle. There's no way she's going to give up Bond. She'll probably keep it until the day she dies or until she's a really old woman.
LOL...is BABS not REALLY OLD....Already??!!😳😳🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I think you may have been right with the "Oscar Bait" aspect of EONs other projects and I think that mindset infiltrated the Bond franchise too. The Craig era certainly felt heavier on drama and emotion than in the past and NTTD seemed to be that same "Oscar Bait", as least to me. I feel like Barbara especially may be of the mindset of "Well, we're not winning any gold trophies with this secret agent so we'll just focus on other things".
Like you, I'll be stunned if we get ANY significant Bond news in 2023.
And they need to abandon this mindset to recruiting a new era of fans.
Skyfall had 5 Oscar nominations-Cinematography, Song, score, editing and sound mixing-wining 2-song and sound editing. Spectre got nominated for the song and won and NTTD got 3 nominations [sound, song, visual effects] wining again for song so they are getting Oscars which is a big change from most of the past [as shown by Calvin's excellent Oscar video] and other awards like the Baftas'. Oscars do seem to be nominating more mainstream films [like Top Gun this year] though that is partly to address there slipping relevance.
@@jamesatkinsonja The abysmal NTTD song got an Oscar nom, Man the Oscars have low standards.
I think Skyfall was really where we saw that big shift happen. Like going back to Casino and Quantum they have their drama elements, but they still feel more in line with the action films of the era. When they got a director like Sam Mendes for Skyfall, naturally he seemed to push into the drama direction (and I wonder if part of that was a result of them trying to keep the budget down after QoS.) And then when everything lined up for Skyfall it really got into Oscar conversation, and the films got seen more as 'prestige franchise' after then.
Eon was chasing that Skyfall energy afterwards, and it'll be interesting to see if they keep going in that direction with the next film or if Broccoli will focus more on doing Oscar-bait films between Bond films.
That's one of the many bad things about the oscars. They've never fully appreciated the Bond films. They went over thirty years without even nominating a Bond movie for an award. Every movie should be nominated for at least technical awards, like sound and visual effects. Plus the 60th anniversary tribute at the show last year was just embarrassing.
What I'd like the reasoning to be especially would be them observing the reasons the new Top Gun was so successful. I know Broccoli and Wilson were aiming for an even more emotional Bond, so maybe they're rethinking that stance. The reality though may well be what youve explained in this vid. I'll be completely honest atm I'm in a Tom Cruise phase as it is. I've recently watched all the Mission Impossibles ready for Dead Reckoning Part 1 this summer. Absolutely hyped for that!
I have to admit that I was extremely surprised when they did the multi-movie arc "reset" when Casino Royale came out. But they did pull it off in spectacular fashion, especially with the choice of casting Daniel Craig and getting back to serious spy story telling. In trying to remember that lesson learned from the pros I am keeping an open mind, but it's going be real tough determining what (realistically) else to do with that specific character now. Maybe something along the lines of what happened after Isaac Asimov's original Foundation Trilogy? In that case, (roughly) there were a couple of novels written (by Asimov and others after he died) that told of the Galactic Empire before the formation of the Foundation, several that told of the fall and the end of both the Empire and the Foundation later, and several books that filled in the gaps amongst all of that. 10 total novels or so in all, if I remember correctly.
Craig was not a good Bond at the end. It was really depressing and he looked like he had been through the meat grinder of a political career. Looked like stayed in office too long. Craig's last Bond should have been Skyfall.
There have been long gaps before. Licence to kill in 89 followed by Goldeneye in 95. And selecting a new Bond is a big make or break decision.
Nonsense.
They could have 20 years and a trillion dollar budget and it would still be terrible. They simply have no creativity.
Hence why they just blew 300 million on the worst Bond movie every made. From Russia with Love cost 2 million and when corrected for inflation it equates to about $20 million today. John Wick cost $20 million to make and was hundreds of times better.
I think what a lot of oriole miss out on here is that the world of cinema just doesn’t work the way it did 40 years ago anymore. I‘m as annoyed as you guys are but from a producer’s viewpoint you can’t just mindlessly release movies every 2-3 years, not matter if they’re good or bad. Nowadays you have to put a lot more effort into these movies and that count’s especially for Bond who has become some sort of prestige film series. I think they want to keep that specialness about these movies in comparison to other blockbuster movies and that’s why they’re taking so long. Also let’s just hope they’re waiting for Nolan or Villeneuve to finish releasing their latest movies.
I think part of it is just them not wanting to leak information too soon and they have more than they're letting on. Though the wait sucks in this age of mass produced factory fodder movies it's nice to think they might actually be taking the time to craft something worth seeing.
Nah.
They are just unimaginative and lack any sort of serious creative aspect to their movie productions.
Couldn't agree more, in the downtime waiting for NTTD they had plenty of time to be thinking of 007's new direction and what actor to play him.I can only think they are letting enough time pass to build up anticipation & hunger for Bond again, much like the 6 years between License To Kill and Goldeneye. Daniel Craig looked quite old in the role by the end, they should really go with a younger actor if its going to be 3-4 years between films
Love your work Calvin - please keep it up - you're a natural presenter with capacious Bond knowledge. Love it!
Wow, thank you so much! Really appreciate this and I certainly have no plans of slowing down any time soon :D
Babs doesn't care anymore. And if she doesn't care, what are the chances that the next Bond flick will be any better than the rubbish of the last Bond flick?
If I was in charge of Bond, first thing I'd do is green light a trilogy of anthology Bond films starring 3 different actors as Bond, and set in 3 different time periods: Make them proper spy films and set them in the 60s, 80s and present, with Pierce Brosnan as old man Bond. Give him the great last Bond film that he deserves.
Then I'd green light a 00 TV series focusing on all the other 00s. That way you can make them all as diverse and inclusive as wokefully possible without having to mess with Bond's gender, ethnicity, sexuality and hyper-masculinity.
That's how I'd fix Bond.
Almost exactly the thoughts I've had! For years now I've thought they should do a few special "spinoff" Bond films, properly done and period pieces. I was thinking 50s and early 60s myself. The other 00s Amazon style spinoff is a great idea to let the kids mess around with all the woke fad stuff all they like. But mainly, I would simply make a new normal proper James Bond film, and I'd likely cast Aidan Turner. Give him the right haircut somewhere between TND Brosnan and Dr No Connery style, fix his wonky front teeth with a removable brace for 10 months and make him temper his accent to something similar to his Poldark voice. Good writers (not those amateurish hacks Purvis and Wade) and directors would make him into one of the all time great Bonds. I'd also pay Martin Campbell a huge sum to return again to kick the movies back into shape and make the movies fun, exciting and cool again. Not miserable, repetitively "woke", chores to watch all trying to follow on like a tv show and making Blofeld Bond's brother and M his dad and Moneypenny his half sister in some pathetically hackish attempt to force drama and pretend you're doing something clever and different. They're Bond movies, they are what they are and just need to slightly modify with the times and styles, nothing more. it is not rocket science and they don't need to constantly think they have to reinvent the wheel every time. Give Bond fans what they want, and you can make new other things, including maybe some tastefully done spinoff "content" for amazon to play up to other people's preferences. People are different and want different things from entertainment like movies, but they now have this idea that absolutely everything needs to be sanitized, deconstructed and reformed into a one-size-fits-all black, gay and trans genre.
I would LOVE to see more good, unique and original stories that give black actors and LGBT actors a proper platform to perform and develop cool new characters and things. But just commandeering everyone else's stuff is not the way forward. In fact, it could easily be seen as a massive injustice to black and LGBT equality to give people the idea that it's all these straight white characters that are the great ones, and must be taken over...as if other races and so on aren't good enough develop and be their own cool characters and tell their own stories. I find it all really bizarre, but don't get me wrong, when people swing the other extreme and start banging on about the woke brigade taking over I have no time for that nonsense either. It seems to be 95% manufactured outrages in the media in order to get people clicking links and watching shows, thereby profiting from ad revenue. The world has been truly taken over by faceless, soulless big business thanks to modern tech, sadly.
I think one way or another that it is time for new blood in the production. I think Barbara and Michael are either tired or out of new ideas. It almost seems like they are sitting at their desks, scratching their head, and trying to figure out where to go again.
My guess: a mix of giving people time to breath between Bonds so they’ll be more open between interpretations, also the Craig era was so long, there really taking there time and thinking about what they want to keep and try something different
I think you’re right with everything here. I don’t think you’re being pessimistic as far as the timeline goes. And I really loved your analogy of the handmade wooden toy as opposed to a plastic product.
Here in the states, I was aware of the movie Till. Maybe because it has more to do with the unfortunate history here than over in England. I didn’t realize, however, that it was Barbara Broccoli who produced it. I could see where it was definitely a movie that could be considered a prestige picture - a movie that could possibly have some Oscar nominations. So now I’m thinking that you are correct that Barbara has other things on her mind at the moment, such as creating her own legacy. Michael G Wilson may not be retired, but clearly the energy behind the series at this time is Barbara Broccoli. And that is not a slam against Michael. He has certainly made many invaluable contributions to this series over a long time period of time.
I actually believe Calvin we are going too be waiting at the very least 2 years The bloody thing takes over a year just to film it. I have the horrible feeling Calvin, that the release date is around Christmas 2025. I hope they prove me wrong. Flipping awesome upper Tier video by your amazing self good sir.
I just want a more formulaic and fun Bond tone, similar to Brosnan or Moore
Yes! I also think that Dalton's films had the perfect balance, they were fun, violent and action-packed, the Craig Era was good, but, it made everything so dark.
@@NickTheStallion Dalton is a fantastic mold to go off of. I love Licence to Kill and if Living Daylights had a better third act it could be a top 5 Bond movie
Oh no not another Moore!! He was the worst JB. Didn't like the tone of those films at all. J B is not a comedic role , although some irreverence is good, the Moore films were just ridiculous. We need a Bond who is true to the original character written by Fleming. He's tough and uncompromising and a killer.
At this point I don't mind how much time we have to wait until a new Bond film. I just care about quality...
Drive a dump truck full of money up to Christopher Nolan's house. He's not made of stone!
The question the producers are asking and having trouble with is, where do we go from here? Not to belittle any of his predecessors, but the impact Daniel Craig had on the Bond Films was phenomenal: his five films were awesome, drawing global attention and forcing us to take Bond seriously. Craig's 007 was the brutal yet charismatic government assassin Fleming created. He has left his successor with very, very big shoes to fill as we all now expect the same high standard, yet whoever they cast now will be starting from square one. It's an almost impossible task.
Craig era was an absolute travesty to the Bond franchise, produced no good films and destroyed the character. Starting from square one is a necessity to not repeat the mistakes of the past 22 years.
@@arrgghh1555 Try actually watching the films and doing some research before making such baseless, moronic assessments, child. Craig was a huge critical success, particularly for those of us who actually understand the Bond phenomenon. Now go troll somewhere else.
sadly there's nothing we can do except wait and be patient. in the meantime i'll continue to rewatch the series
I can only re-watch Casino Royal in the modern era and that is now 17 years old.
The most unforgivable thing about the ridiculously long waits is how the last film STILL managed to feel extremely rushed and quickly cobbled together.
Not really. Love it or hate it, NTTD was clearly given a lot of polish.
@@HOTD108_ Not in the script departement. The script was again being written during filming, and it shows.
@@WH250398 Really? I'd never have guessed. It felt really solid to be me. Sure, I have some criticisms of the story, but I could say the same for most movies.
@David Wolfish, I'd have to respectfully disagree. I appreciate that you believe it was solid, but I can only say that the first half of the movie was solid. After the scene with Ana de Armas, the film seems rushed and falls apart. Felix is rushed to his death, Safin's plan doesn't make too much sense, his interest in Madeline doesn't make much sense, Bloefelds death seems rushed, Bond's death is clumsy, and that entire thing with Safin taking Mathilde, only for him to let her go in mere moments felt out of place. There was so much there, but after the first half, it feels like Fukunaga said "Alright people, let's wrap it up." Regatdless of if I liked the ideas or not (I personally didn't find the daughter plot that great), the execution is weak imho And for a nearly 3 hour film written by Bond veterans, it's a bit inexcusable.
@@HOTD108_ No, it was rushed and rewritten and it shows
I honestly am fine if the Bond series ends with No Time to Die. It was a fine conclusion and I feel the direction they take with future Bond movies will be very disappointing to fans
By this time i think they should sell it so we can have content. One movie every 5 years isnt enough, for me.
Totally agree. Sell it and get more movies more often, even if some of them are bad. Nothing new there.
If you sell it, the “magic” goes. Pumping out a mass amount of content doesn’t mean it’s going to be good. Look at Marvel
@@josmacch Totally agree with you, but I'd rather take the risk then wait another 3-4 years for something worse than No Time to Die. The only thing we really have to look forward to under this umbrella is Bond not dying...again.
@@josmacch i m really not a fan of that approach, just like you. But if we can get more frequent movies i will endure a tv show of Q or Nomi/ Moneypenny. I still think we will end up winning.
@@JoaoPereiray tell that to Halo fans😂
Remember that we waited 6 years between LTK and Goldeneye. We also waited 6 years between Spectre and No Time to Die. If by 2027 we don’t hear anything then you can worry.
I'm not expecting any significant Bond film news for quite some time. Looking forward to seeing what the IO Interactive Bond game is like though! It's been so long since we've had a new game!!
I adhered to the old saying, "How can we miss you if you won't go away?" Let Bond have a rest for a while. I'm OK waiting 5 or 6 (or more years) for the next one. I've seen every Bond film in the theaters since "The Spy Who Loved Me", back when the Roger Moore 007 films were coming out bi-annually, but I don't mind waiting years for the next one. ( There was six years between License to Kill and Goldeneye.)
I'd rather wait years than have an MCU deal, where some big corporation is flooding us with endless mediocre content on a conveyor belt.
Agreed, however we were fed mediocre content on a conveyor belt for the last two Bond films. The last decent film (Skyfall) was over 10 years ago.
Maybe I'm just impatient but, for me, 3 years between movies is long enough to miss it. I don't need 6 or more. I get that they're trying to decipher what direction to go in for the next "era." Probably because, these days, nobody is happy with just taking things movie by movie. I wish they would, though. If the Craig era taught us anything, isn't it that they CAN'T plan an entire era? At least not without unconvincing and often irritating re-cons.
@Joey O. Craig, imho could have EASILY had the best films in the series if they weren't so adamant about the connective universe. Why should Bond have a "direction" when each film is a standalone. Sure, have an idea for tone for each film, but they seem to be trying to recreate the Craig magic, which creatively gave us arguably two of the best Bond films, two of the worst, and an okayish finish. And surprise surprise, two of Craig's best were the ones that weren't connected to anything.
Have a rest?
Some of you must be joking. There was 6 years between Spectre and No Time to die. What are you old age pensioners that cannot hand a little bit of excitement.
If they do not get a movie made in the next 2 year that is refreshing and involves character and story Bond is dead and will never recover.
Bond cannot handle another wait to produce a dreary political statement made movie.
This channel is preparing for 4 more years of videos like this 😆
If you cannot tell your friends from your enemies, it’s time to go
Barbara and Michael should pass on the baton.
I'm actually working on an episode about this right now, I have A LOT of thoughts about the new era and that we need to wait for a while. I think it's a GOOD thing to take some time to breathe and figure out what this thing is.
While it is irritating having to wait so long for the next Bond movie, I think they should take their time. Having Bond movies come out every few years makes each one feel like an event and maybe a bit more distinct from one another. For me each Daniel Craig movie felt unique whereas the Roger Moore movies, which use to be released yearly or biyearly, sorta blend together for me sometimes (I still enjoy them tho).
I agree
Taking their time means nothing. If they are not creative it does not matter how much time they have.
It could be 6 months or 6 years and they will still produce a dead fish.
Given the state of Hollywood and the agendas they just can't seem to help themselves from pushing, I'm not in much of a rush to see Bond return.
Most of the Craig movies had the "plastic mass-produced feel to them" you mentioned. I feel like the producers, in concert with those two hack writers who've been ruining bond ever since TWINE, have already thrown the baby out with the bathwater and destroyed everything that made Bond films special, fun and great. I think they've lost the plot, honestly.
Well said 👍
Spot on. A lot of Bond fans are still in denial about this.
The Daniel Craig movies do not have that issue being plastic mass-produced wrong there
I couldn’t have said it better myself!
The hell Bond movies haven't gone downhill since TWINE
I feel like some wait will eventually be worth it in a year or so, we’ll have plenty to quench our thirst with the new bond game and the upcoming bond film by then hopefully 🙏🏼
To be honest I’m more excited for the project 007 game from IO interactive, but on a similar theme we haven’t had any news on that either. I really can’t wait to play that game but when will that be coming out? 2025/26? What do you think Calvin?
Good luck coming up with content for this channel until the next Bond movie in 2027, Calvin;)
Hello Calvin Dyson it is me Joseph for your live stream of golden eye on the Nintendo switch
I think it is a combination of factors; Michael G Wilson wanting to retire, Barbara wanting to make other films and win an Oscar along the way and a third factor, Amazon. Up until now Amazon Studios have had a very hands off approach to their movies but Rings of Power shows that when Jeff Bezos takes a personal interest in an IP things go south pretty quickly. So the next official announcement from EON could be them selling their stake in Bond.
Much as I’d love more new Bond, we still got decades of stuff to go back. And I don’t really mind waiting, if it means a good Bond movie or whatever comes out.
To be fair, there is a broccolli shortage here in the UK right now. This isn't science fiction, it is in fact science fact.
I'm just happy to see they actually give a damn. They can take all the time they need so long as they are working towards getting it right. Star Wars, and many other franchises, both video game and film have fallen into the tragedy of rushed products.
Bond isn’t Marvel, there doesn’t need to be new “content” every week with a Disney series, three theatrical sequels, a HBO Max series and a web series all going on at the same time. A Bond movie every 5-6 years keeps the series special.
Nonsense.
Bond in the 1960s averaged a movie every two years and they were really creative with their writing.
Not that hard really.
5-6 years is far too long! 3 years maximum is just about bearable.
6 years for GoldenEye after License to Kill
4 years for Casino Royale after Die Another Day
Exactly. Dr.No, From Russia With Love, and Goldfinger were all produced within 3 years and all still rank high.
Also, imagine waiting "5-6 years" for that "special" Bond film and it is actually not that good. I, for one, would be royally pissed.
It’s generally slowed down since they ran out of books for inspiration. I agree with OP, as we’ve seen with starwars ..nothing kills a franchise faster than trying to pump out “content”
I fear we won't see a film from them until 2026 at the earliest but am ready to be proven wrong! Whatever happens, keep up the great work Calvin and don't forget to check out the recent Hitman games. I'm playing the 2018 sequel and there are some good Bondian moments which gives me confidence for the upcoming Bond game.
5:04 The Rhythm Section? I was one of the other 12 people who liked it Calvin! The world needs to catch up!
I liked it too, although the cinema usher seemed confused when he checked my ticket as it seemed even he hadn't heard of it.
My idea for a new 007 franchise of movies is as follows:
007 has gotten the ability from q to travel forth and back
in time with a timetravel machine.There he starts to stop
the begining of Spectre.But Spectre has duplicated q's timetravel machine,
so they goes further back in time,and changes lots of historical
happenings,so that the present is quite different when 007 comes back
to present time.007 must therefore stop Spectre before they manages
to duplicate q's timemachine.
A good lead for these franchise might be Sam Claflin and Claes Bang as chef for Spectre ?
The fact there no real interest in making a new Bond movie is worrying. Could it be we may never see another official Bond film...just a thought...
If we are all being brutally honest as much as Barbara and Michael have been fantastic custodians of the franchise it’s arrived at the time for them to step down. Actions speak louder than words and it appears very obvious that they view James Bond as a burden rather than a privilege nowadays so it should be given to someone who has the same love and enthusiasm for the character which Ian Fleming had all those years ago 🙏🏻
@Eliot Pawley, just who should this be? Anybody else doing a James Bond movie would most likely be shot down by fans as being 'woke' and not worthy of doing said movie.
I think that the Brocolis doing other films _besides_ James Bond ones is a good thing rather than they just be expected to do only the James Bond ones and nothing else but the James Bond ones (a media franchise taking a few years off _isn't_ a bad thing, and actually was good for the Godzilla franchise and the _Star Trek_ one to have a sabbatical. ) As a Bondfan, I don't see what the big problem is.
I agree with your point of wanting the franchise in the hands of someone with love and enthusiasm for the character, but find your example of Ian Fleming an odd choice. Fleming famously went through periods where he viewed the character as a burden and even tried killing him off. So I wouldn't use Fleming as an example if you're wanting someone with only positive feelings about working on the character.
@@richardgrant517 Okay that’s fine I was more referring to when he first created the character. Anyone who has the respect and dedication to producing consistent output and giving something back to the fans would be something that I approve of and I guess my point of highlighting him as an example is to show just the extent to which Barbara and Michael have taken their foot off the gas whereby new direction is needed to attract a younger audience otherwise the franchise is threatened to die out unfortunately and nobody wants that!
@@Neville60001 I wouldn’t have enough knowledge of the film industry to accurately choose a replacement but there must be valid and worthwhile options for the greatest franchise of all time. I would be very happy if they passed it down to the future generations of Broccoli’s as I’m sure they would bring new energy but keep and maintain the same principals which have gone before. I’m happy with 3/4 year breaks as it keeps the films as an event but once you start heading the territory of 6/7 years and 1/2 a decade in the wider world James Bond starts to become perceived as an ‘old man’s’ thing which it isn’t!
@Elliot Paveley sure, but I think more of what we are seeing is that Barbara and Michael had that passion when they started and have over time, like Fleming, they might be a little burned out with the character. Which makes sense- they've be running the franchise for 25 years now, which is twice as long as writing the Fleming novels. And basically the same time Cubby spent producing the series. It makes sense that they wouldn't have the same passion for the series at this point as they did 15 years ago.
I am totally fine waiting for a Bond film that is top quality. I hope we get news at least this year on who it is going to be
Was so nice to see Barbara Broccoli being interviewed, wearing one of Monica Lewinsky’s old dresses.
They have always said that they have to figure out the tone, direction, storyline, etc. before they start looking for a Bond, and I totally see that point, but I personally think the other way round would be much more interesting and probably would lead to better end results:
Focus first on finding a new Bond that really sets you on fire. Someone that walks in the room and has the producers thinking "THAT's our Bond." Someone who brings something exciting to the table that perhaps that producers hadn't previously considered. Then, and only then, starting thinking about the kind of world that actor would live in as Bond. What kind of Bond would they be? What kind of stories would they be at place in? Then, start looking for directors and writers who will excel with that brief and let them craft the new Bond style around the actor.
That's just my take, I think it would be more interesting than Barbara and Michael brainstorming with some hot shot director and then running casting calls for their idea of the next Bond, settling for someone who fits the brief without the fresh, exciting magic.
Going by a past example-for Casino Royale, they decided to go more serious, then hired Martin Campbell to direct and he was part of the casting process for Craig who they could then tailor the script to suit.
My main worry with the Amazon takeover is Bond losing it's identity, I get a horrible feeling it'll become more corporate feeling, instead of how it's still very British and somewhat niche
Your local McDonalds is a franchise, the New England Patriots are a franchise, the Bond films are a film series....
Other than that, very interesting stuff, they either need to get their fingers out and get started on the new number 26, or pass it on to another party
I had commented on your video about two years ago stating I thought Barbara and Michael had thrown in the towel after No Time to Die, but everyone on the comment board downplayed my comments. I still think they have no intention after three years of redoing Bond again. Michael is 81 and Barbara is close to 70. My opinion and again, nothing has changed since my initial comment - I believe Bond has retired and he’s not coming back ever again. I may be wrong, but I wasn’t wrong when I predicted they were going to kill Bond off six months before No Time to Die came out. It’s just a gut feeling. Thanks for the memories Mr. Bond.
I am conflicted. I do want to see more Bond very soon, but on the other hand I don't want to see it becoming Amazon's cash cow with endless spinoffs.
ATJ would work as Bond. I had my heart set on Cavill but rumour has it they'll want a Bond who'll have more "legs" as it were.
Legs. Brosnan, Dalton & Moore were in their 40's when they began playing Bond. It's the constant delays which have created the problems. Henry Cavill is at the perfect age presently to portray the character.
A "No One Lives Forever" Game Review would be great. For me the best spy game ever. Greatings from Germany.
No-bo-dy LIVES for-EVER
Makes me feel sad for the rest.
Seconded, been enjoying the video game stuff
She’s positively citing Biden?? YIKES. Does he remember it occurred??
bit off topic but I was watching superman 2 the other day and theres a scene where j w pepper randomly pops up and I thought I should mention it if you didn't know already??? it made me chuckle !
Hopefully, as a silver lining for the lack of Bond news, you'll get more opportunities to complete your reviews of the series. I don't want to come across as entitled because I can appreciate how much hard work goes into them, but they're always thoroughly enjoyable. So...here's hoping.
A lot has changed. But my best guess is that they hard reboot Bond. Especially after a film where he died. The hard reboot will likely be both a recast of Bond and the whole MI6 cast along with a new origin story similar to OHMSS or Casino Royale
They dug a hole for themselves by killing Bond off. Truth is they can't get out of it....nor can they be bothered to.
I’m happy to patiently wait it out. Until all the right pieces are in place. Including the best actor for the job, best writer/story and director. NTTD is still quite fresh in everyone’s mind. I personally loved it despite the controversial and very questionable ending. I’m happy for a new Bond to be released in the mid to late 2020s that is amazing than one in a couple of years after the last one that is average.
It does not work like that. Either a movie is well made or it is not. It does not matter how much time they have or how big the budget is.
The movie has to be creative and have somebody in charge that knows what they are doing. I would rather see several movies over the next 10 years than 2 movies. At least with the 7 you have a better chance of creativity.
if the just threw caution to the wind and start making stuff they may succeed.
My point is they need to get back to the drawing board and take their time on figuring out something new and interesting, when all the pieces are in place and they manage to get directors and writers who can steer the series in a new and exciting direction with competence then great. If the films are produced within 2 years apart of each other then even better. But not without the foundations being placed down first.
I have to say I completely agree with you. No one seems in any hurry, and honestly it hasn't felt like anyone over at EON has been in much of a hurry to generate new Bond content since at least the release of Quantum of Solace a decade and a half ago. That was the last time it felt like Bond was a relevant property in the mainstream with tie-in video games and mainstream buzz.. Since then it has been the slowest possible drip. Even Skyfall's success seemed like a momentary blip of Bond on the public's radar.
I get the feeling that Barbara and Michael G Wilson feel like they've sort of done their time--which is absolutely true. But like you, I can't say I completely hate the prospect of Amazon just getting the rights to get this ball actually rolling.
Skyfall was a good production and had a good movie set feel to it but the signs were there when we look back and see that the dreary depressing Bond was just starting to rise. The type of Bond that would cry, look depressed and carry some sort of emotional bagging that the writers and producers could not contain their excitement with but the audience did not care for it.
This seems like a silly question. It's my own opinion but I don't care to hear anything about a new Bond film until at least 5 years from now. No Time to Die just came out in October 2021 so we need time for a breather. Otherwise it will be considered an oversaturation in an already crowded cinema market. Waiting a few more years will help make the next Bond film fresh and relevant.
I have literally no ideas at all on this one, so instead I would like to ask Calvin if he has seen the new Luther movie? I think it would be of interest to a lot of people on this channel given that a) there was a lot of talk in the past about Idris Elba coming into the Bond role (obviously I don’t think that’s still likely) and b) I saw the film last night and without giving too much away, I have to say the ending gave us something interesting to speculate about in terms of the future of that particular franchise, that might bring it a bit closer to this one.
I don't think Barbara was ever all that interested in 007 outside of making money, this is kind of shown in how hit and miss the Bond movies been under her era. While we had some great ones under her, we had a few duds. She inherited from her dad, it was more his passion I think.
Another thing holding up a new Bond movie is according to reports No Time to Die lost Ion about 100 million dollars, due to the cost of production and advertising it reportedly needed to make 900 million to break even at the box office and it finished with under 800.
I don't think we will see a new Bond movie for several years yet, they likely won't even start it for another year or two. I also don't think we will see consistent quality from the Bond franchise until it has another producer at the helm, one who is also a fan of the franchise.
The $100 million loss reports [23 November 2021] were from an 'source close to the production' which is always dubious even if Variety ran the story. MGM hit back the following day [24 November 2021] saying the sources were 'unnamed and uniformed' saying the story was not true.
Given she's worked on Bond since Octopussy I can't agree with the 'not interested' part. Michael G. Wilson started his career as a lawyer and got involved in Bond sorting out the Broccoli-Saltzman split but quickly got involved in the movie side and stayed there ever since. Cubby also did his share of duds [Man with the Golden Gun for example which even he said he'd like to re-do in parts if he had a chance].
I don't have an opinion on the timeline but would like to say that it seems that Bond is now following other franchises (Bourne) rather than leading. I'd like to see Bond go back to the Cold War era and perhaps scale down a bit. That would get me excited for Bond again and not wait for DVD or streaming.
Bond's always followed other franchises. Moonraker from Star Wars for example or Licence to Kill from Lethal Weapon/Miami Vice. It's partly why the series has been able to movie to with the times.
Why do we need a cold war era when we have a hot Ukraine era?
I'm more of a casual Bond fan - I enjoy movies when they come out, but I'm not actively involved in the 'fandom', so the long gaps don't irritate me. Having said that, I do love the franchise/series, and I would so love if we could get a semi-consistent schedule. But even then you run the risk of just rushing something for the sake of hitting a vague 2-4 year schedule expectation. It's a tricky one. Maybe the series just needs new visions, and new chiefs at the top.
(Maybe Barbara could remain the top exec, but in a capacity which means she just oversees the whole thing, but someone else - or a team - actually take charge and run the show? That way, if she wants to pursue other projects, she can get on with that, as well as allowing Bond to continue under her guidance without grinding to a halt.)
If Albert Broccoli were still alive I don't think he would like what his daughter did to the James Bond franchise...
It's really sad to say, but I have to agree. He even specifically told her before he died not to change things too much or let anyone ruin it. Et voila.
100% agree, my friend. 100%.
He would be horrified by it. She has truly destroyed Bond. They have one more movie chance to salvage Bond but I cannot see them saving it.
I think the worse is yet to come sadly.
I actually _want_ them to take a long time on the next one. Given how No Time To Die ended, it’s going to be another reboot. Give it some breathing room before they start.
A long time is the last thing they need.
I wonder if Barbara would be happier just collecting a percentage and letting someone else take over the creative side of film and media a la Kevin Feige for Marvel, James Gunn and Peter Safran for DC, and Jon Favreau for Lucasfilm.
If they get get around to another bond film they should cast a younger actor in the role to get more films out of him.
I hope they take a lot more than 5 years to figure stuff out!!
Reinvent the character. Introduce new styles for bond.
Just look at 2 of the greatest bond films of all time.
Casino Royale. 4 years after the previous film.
Goldeneye. 6 years after the previous film.
Another example is golden gun came out LITERALLY right after LALD. They started releasing too many bond films to fast. And it just becomes nonsense filler that isn't even good cinema...
After that they waited from 1974 to 1977, taking like a 2-3 year break and actually taking time to give us something good. And behoLd TSWLM is arguably top 3 or 4 bond films, and of its time, the greatest bond film since 1964 Goldfinger!
Remember when there was a Bond blockbuster every two years? Even when casting a new Bond! The spoiled kids don't have the same hunger!
Great video Calvin! I think it mostly boils down to two things - Barbara losing interest, and the Cold War ending
Given the Cold War ended over 30 years ago I doubt that's got anything to do with it. Besides, the majority of the Bond films made during that don't really go into it. When Russian villains appear, they make sure to have more friendly characters like Gogol and Pushkin present so it wasn't as big a factors as the novels [and even then Fleming moved towards using the a-political Spectre as villains].
As a twenty year old rewatching the movies I couldn’t have enjoyed the films more than ever! They came out year after year after year for the first four and even when there was two year breaks the films we’re mostly undeniably fun and great.
I know it’s not the 1960’s anymore and there are so many new standards with movies nowadays people looking back at movies like Thunderball, Goldfinger, Goldeneye, Spy who loved me, and others thinking they’re boring with no substance. I didn’t fully enjoy NTTD and severely disliked Spectre so I can wait alittle longer for something in a more classic form.
Hopefully the game from IO interactive may serve that need
The good part is that Bond films are never really heavy on post-production, once they have the script, director and actors locked down it's a pretty quick turnover. Unless of course another pandemic hits lol.