Because I know that Google is capable of this, I have to ask. Can Google please integrate building blocks similar to App Inventor to Tensorflow? Because, I can't use code. But, I love programming in App Inventor.
gets me, talking about "that long python code "if youre not a data scientist" ....lol, how can anyone use any of this stuff if they cant understand hte basics ? lol
I would like to leave a constructive opinion, in fact, a reflection. Excuse me for my ignorance, but, correct me, please, if I got it wrong. All the videos I saw about the SUPPOSED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE and the SUPPOSED MACHINE LEARNING, including this video, only say what the concept is, and what they (the SUPPOSED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE and the SUPPOSED MACHINE LEARNING) are for, but , do not show how they are produced, that is, it is not shown how these miracles happen. In short: it seems that it is a speculation, or a lie, or an imagination in the minds of those who say that they exist, or just a retransmission of what others say, or a belief. It remains unclear, whether ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE and MACHINE LEARNING, are behaviors that are in the programming algorithm, pre-programmed, or, if they are behaviors that the program does without the algorithm, and that the program would write that algorithm by himself (which would be impossible with today's technology), and would have more lines in the algorithm, or some change in the code (as if it were an invisible hand writing more lines of code or changing the algorithm). They say there is programming involved, but it is unclear, without explanation, if it is already existing programming (and, in this case, there is no machine learning or artificial intelligence); or, if an algorithm appears that was not written by someone. Stay there, the reflection!
That's like expecting to understand rocket science by watching launch videos from SpaceX. If you are really interested, I suggest reading the following book: 'Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow 2nd Ed'. BTW, I might have some free time today to explain all the AI you could possibly be interested in. I find explaining AI in general quite enjoyable. Let me know if you are interested.
The most flexible and powerful ML library!
**cough**
Pytorch
**cough**
Sir if you will, I need resources for learning tensorflow..
TensorFlow’s logo is literally one orange rectangle away from FleetFarm’s logo 😆
Thank you for an excellent intro to your latest Product Additions
Tensorflow lite for microcontrollers looks like a game changer, I'm surprised they didn't emphasize that more
Awesome! The guy at 20:50 sounded like he was selling the product hahah
thank you
Thanks tensor
Thanks
Because I know that Google is capable of this, I have to ask. Can Google please integrate building blocks similar to App Inventor to Tensorflow? Because, I can't use code. But, I love programming in App Inventor.
Good Work.. 👍👍
OMG, ML is easier than ever, Even I can do this.
ML Kit has 500M active users per month, really?
Great... Thanks
gets me, talking about "that long python code "if youre not a data scientist" ....lol, how can anyone use any of this stuff if they cant understand hte basics ? lol
I would like to leave a constructive opinion, in fact, a reflection. Excuse me for my ignorance, but, correct me, please, if I got it wrong. All the videos I saw about the SUPPOSED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE and the SUPPOSED MACHINE LEARNING, including this video, only say what the concept is, and what they (the SUPPOSED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE and the SUPPOSED MACHINE LEARNING) are for, but , do not show how they are produced, that is, it is not shown how these miracles happen. In short: it seems that it is a speculation, or a lie, or an imagination in the minds of those who say that they exist, or just a retransmission of what others say, or a belief. It remains unclear, whether ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE and MACHINE LEARNING, are behaviors that are in the programming algorithm, pre-programmed, or, if they are behaviors that the program does without the algorithm, and that the program would write that algorithm by himself (which would be impossible with today's technology), and would have more lines in the algorithm, or some change in the code (as if it were an invisible hand writing more lines of code or changing the algorithm). They say there is programming involved, but it is unclear, without explanation, if it is already existing programming (and, in this case, there is no machine learning or artificial intelligence); or, if an algorithm appears that was not written by someone. Stay there, the reflection!
That's like expecting to understand rocket science by watching launch videos from SpaceX. If you are really interested, I suggest reading the following book: 'Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow 2nd Ed'.
BTW, I might have some free time today to explain all the AI you could possibly be interested in. I find explaining AI in general quite enjoyable.
Let me know if you are interested.
AI is just simply *using old data to predict new data.* There's nothing miraculous behind all this.
Read some research papers or watch lecture videos of machine learning instead of watching RUclips videos about an update of a software library
@@phannhathuy5691 anything that is complicated and misunderstood looks miraculous or magical
@@phannhathuy5691 Little bit correction here.. it's using the new data to predict the future data 🙃
I do not believe in AI
its totally fine.. you're still using technologies which are using AI at its core