I’d offer that this is the first opportunity for a viable replacement for a computer monitor. When you sit down to work and try to get into a productive flow this might be the ideal solution. Then take it off for everything else.
Ed's point that the SEC needs to do a mea culpa and admit that they should never have approved the listing of companies they think are illegal is spot on.
A $3,500 headset is meant for developers, early adopters, enterprise (that can afford it). You could have a worker maintaining a high value product/item. Say in a remote location. Where the device identifies what's being worked on. And guides the technician to perform the task using a heads up display and written or spoken instructions. The headset could be used for simulations and demos. A $3,500 headset's target audience is not the general public. Just some random thoughts.
I'm surprised they didn't understand this. I get Scott's point about stuff on your face, but this technology is about new ways to input into the human brain. It's got a long way to go, and it needs a killer app and refinement to go mainstream, which requires developers to be able to access the tech. $3500 is cheap for that access. Sad as it is, the next phase of human evolution is attaching an iPhone to your face. And it should be mentioned, the killer app for this will never be allowed by Apple, the same killer app that drove everything from VHS, to lots of internet tech like efficient streaming, and secure online payments. (Adult entertainment).
They marketed it as a consumer tech product and Scott has a correct assesment of you wouldn't want to put this on your face. They showed no usecase of it being for work. Hololens is fantatsic but its a work device. They were showing people enjoiying being with their kids but wearing a headset. None of this makes any sense. Xreal makes normal looking glasses that do most of what Apple showed their headset for, and it costs 1/10th the price.
Really appreciate this podcast. Scott is direct, not always right, but puts it out there... And do think he is right about engaging with Saudi's, and India... bring home the $$$
Scott and Ed🎉🎉 your observations are sharp and clear. I really appreciate your competence and intelligence. Playing hard ball means being agile in mind and body. Stay healthy and enjoy your day 😊
I agree with Scott regarding the lifestyle quality I infer from headsets but one should note that there was a time when we all enjoyed the social experience of going to a record store, enjoying cover art and generally enjoying music with friends, showing off your record collection…not to mention going to movie theaters…and that this has been totally disrupted by “personalized” entertainment devices starting with the Sony Walkman almost 50 years ago and refined to great profit by…you guessed it…Apple.
Past Apple Product Failures- The LISA The Apple Newton. Apple Pippin. Round Mouse. The Apple Macintosh Portable. The Power Mac G4 Cube. The U2 iPod. Apple eMate. Macintosh TV.
Wishful thinking does not equal good future predictions. I tried the Vision Pro, amazing, getting one as soon as I can. According to Zuck (rumors) Apple is manufacturing 1 million Vision Pro units.
America does not need another car for rich people It needs a car for the people in the middle. Put 20% down, pay it off in 3 years, and not exceed 8% of your income. And don't forget "Right to Repair".
I remember all the pundits criticizing the Ipad when it came out, no one could imagine what it was for. Its hard now to see what the Vision Thing is for, but maybe something interesting will become obvious in a year.
Think of the Vision like the Mac Pro - niche market for niche applications (at least for now). Apple is keeping this out there to see what devs will do - the iPhone wasn't great till the Apps came along. Apple is very aware that anything like this will need an app market to make it work.
Gotta disagree with Scott about the potential success of Apple Vision Pro. What we saw at WWDC was great but we must remember this product doesn't come out for another year,. .so there's plenty of time still for Development and big-name vendors to flesh out potential ideas. (AutoCad, ArcGIS, etc,. would all look amazing on this thing). The Augmented-Reality aspect of this (being able to see both VR and Real World stuff simultaneously).. will seal the deal on this. Apple's typically support timeline is "5 to 7 years".. so I don' think it's going to go unsupported in 1 to 2 years. Improvements and software-updates to this over the next year or 2,. should be pretty amazing.
$3500 for goggles that will leave you even more depressed and suicidal. The more time this is on your head, the more you want it all to end. The coolness factor on this is -3500. Some sexy glasses that give you the world is a decade away. This century is much sadder and alone then the last one. This doesn't change that.
@@jimbell6116 This is no different than any other technology or tool,. each person still has to remember moderate and sensible use. If you allow yourself to use it for unhealthy amounts of time,. that's a human-choice failure,.. not a technology failure.
Why is there no LVMH for iphone or the app store? Billionaires and front line workers have access to the same iPhone 14 pro max. Is tech truly an equalizer?
i agree with the liv-pga assessment. if the end goal was to sell out, at least fight for a high price, admonish saudi, and get all of your players taken care of. but to invoke 9/11 and then sell out anyways is some next level tactics lmao
Scott I think you are correct Apple would have a great product releasing a car. The only problem: NO car company has spare electric car manufacturing capacity! Maybe in 10 years... Also phones for $2k might be Apple's thing but there will be no volumes moved at a $200k car!
I believe The headset is a way to test a new computing interface (that’s why it’s named Spatial Computing) and not Meta’s perspective on a social VR/AR device. The price point compares more with a top line computer than where the VR/AR headset market is at…the declining sales of LapTops de -risks cannibalization and provides an exploration on a new way to engage your computing interface vs keep investing in a declining laptop market…IMO…
Prof was way off base on CNN... even if the objective was to bring it back to the center, which it arguably wasn't, the execution was abysmal. The real issue is the 24/7 news model is inherently flawed.
I think Prof G was just pragmatically talking about CNN as a media outlet that caters to a neutral/liberal demographic, he doesn't have any expectation that it will broadly reshape US political discourse.
You're right, just repeating the news every 1/2 hour was never going to work. That's what Rupert Murdoch realised - sell rage and anger to a population that's angry and frustrated with their politicians.
For everyone who wants apple to make a car, I have one question. What kind of Apps will Apple sell for the car? That is where apple makes it money, the App store. Everything they do is to keep milking the app store. Maybe there is a good subscription they could sell.
The problem with the effects of social media such as Facebook/Meta on developing minds is that while it appears empirical and compelling, it can't (yet) be provable or measured in any tangible way---whereas evidence of financial fraud (in the case of Holmes) can be. Yes, teen suicides are up, but there is no provable direct correlation of this to social media alone. There's enough cause in the age we live in to increase depression and anxiety (see: burgeoning income inequality, climate change, et al).
39:55 I wonder if Scott is aware that some of these "AI Catastrophists" are people like Sam Altman and Ilya Sutskever, two of the most powerful people in AI right now.
C'mon Scott, CNN under Zucker was a train wreck. By the time he left the ratings were in the dumpster, all the Fox shows beat them up and down the time slot, all day, every day. Even MSNBC and RUclips beat out CNN. They needed to make a change.
This is always worth viewing for its analysis and insight. However, I think Scott has begun to take on a bit of a bias from the standpoint of a high-income consumer of luxury goods. There is nothing wrong with this, as far as it goes. But it does relate to only a portion of the marketplace. How he views products and services might be different from how Ed or some random man or woman on the street might view these.
Seems everyone who has actually tried it comes away shocked and amazed and convinced. The only doubters seem to be those who haven’t put one on yet. Maybe worth reserving judgment until You try one. 🤷🏻♂️
Apple vision isn’t designed to be a fashion statement. It’s mostly an entertainment device used in the confines of your home. You may not like it, but that’s how it is.
Prof G 's prediction and analysis to business world is usually spot on but when it's about tech, whether it's vision pro or EV industry , he just lacks the in depth knowledge to make any reasonable preduction. USD$3500 is about the same price as a high end TV or laser 4k projectors or a highend gaming PC. Vision pro is a super highend personalized TV + PC combined. It can be a personal theatre, a personal cubicle for working. When you think of it this way, it's not that expensive. But then, i am sure Apple is working on a cheaper non-Pro Vision version.
Ahh.. this is late, Man City already won the treble.. :( You all should also cover Saudi Arabia and oil rich middle eastern countries trying to buy soccer/football clubs..
I don't think Apple should manufacture cars---they should team up with an established global player like Toyota or Volkswagen a co-produce electric cars with them.
"The term “security” means any note, stock, treasury stock, security future, security-based swap, bond, debenture, evidence of indebtedness, certificate of interest or participation in any profit-sharing agreement, collateral-trust certificate, preorganization certificate or subscription, transferable share, investment ..." SEC registers so that the sec knows it's supposed to oversee it and keep watch. The registration is saying "hey, the thing we do might require oversight". Just like drug dealers like Purdue and Pfizer were IPO'd drug dealers. Jpm is a registered fraud, wells Fargo same thing. Registered companies can do illegal things, but right now they're only penalizing coinbase and binance for not regustering when they clearly knew they were trading securities because they mentioned it point blank as a risk in their IPO filing.
I’d disagree on apple being an obvious winner in the car market. I think Tesla’s edge in engineering talent and design vs the other OEM’s is being undersold here, as well as just how difficult cars are to manufacture profitably. Tesla’s the only OEM that’s figured out how to make money right now on their EV offerings, and by quite some margin.
I would have agreed with you on this 2-3 years ago, but a few things have changed my views on Tesla: Their margins are now more in line with other auto manufacturers, Musk has seriously harmed the brand with years of over promising and way under delivering on multiple fronts; Musk showing his true nature and poor management skills via Twitter (plus the text leaks) making some of us reconsider our existing vehicle reservations and whether we'd want to be associated with Musk; Plus Tesla-specific issues such as quality control, privacy, safety, vehicle service experience friction. So I think the magic time for Tesla is past and others in the space are iterating on their success. And that's Apple's jam: taking what someone else has done and tweaking and repackaging it to enhance the presentation and post purchace experience, increase perceived value and drive demand for being associated with them.
I love how Scott defends LIV buying PGA, without ever considering the fact that it won't improve the game at all. It will have the opposite effect. But as long as he'd be ok cashing their check, who the fuck cares. It's this self-focused capitalist view that ruins everything eventually.
If hosting a trump townhall filled where only trump supporters are allowed to express their opinion was "moving to the middle" i d hate to know what moving to the far right looks like - what was next on the plan? talking points with Putin? Why the N*zis weren't that bad? I'm not sure the CEO knew what the middle looked like and mistook bothsidism as the middle.
Sad commentary on the fact you are okay with the Saudis buying the PGA Tour and excusing their human rights nonsense. I gotta strongly disagree with you on this.
This week's AI Poem: There once was a teacher so sketchy, Whose tropes were worn out and stretchy, She’d drone on and on, Till the students were gone, And the class was left feeling quite wretched.
I’m sick of this 58 year old divorcee championing luxury brands and bashing tech. He was wrong about Tesla, I bet he’s wrong about AR and the vision pro 22:30
Dude, if he just toned down the blatant mid life crisis and/or fusion of frattastic has been/ wannabe bad boy persona. And upped the actual academic analysis...he might get a show! But I'm here for the cringe. Best of luck pulling that tinder gal with an onkyfans.
I’d offer that this is the first opportunity for a viable replacement for a computer monitor. When you sit down to work and try to get into a productive flow this might be the ideal solution. Then take it off for everything else.
The look of pride on Scott's face when Ed makes his comments on the SEC/Binance news....priceless
Prof G is a hero to me. Anthony Bourdain would be prof g if he got into commentary
How did you confuse this content with the Kidz bop you were looking for?
Oh boy I have some bad news for you
U need better role models
@@duncanmaclennan9624 mom, i met you at last! Where have you been?
@@vooteimer1234 i can tell youre an expert af kidz bop
The degree of improvement this duo is over Scott's other duo can't be understated.
Kara is very experiences but also utterly insufferable. Imagine someone that makes Scott look like the responsible, level-headed adult in the room...
@@Veryperceptivecat Ideologically captured, arrogent and boring.
Ed is none of those. Instantly better pod.
but, it can be awkwardly stated.
Spot on with LIV. Some of the most thoughtful dialog I've heard to date.
His ability to zoom out and brilliantly comment/analyze on the big picture is really valuable. Love the show.
Never ever…..lose the humor.
Ed's point that the SEC needs to do a mea culpa and admit that they should never have approved the listing of companies they think are illegal is spot on.
A $3,500 headset is meant for developers, early adopters, enterprise (that can afford it). You could have a worker maintaining a high value product/item. Say in a remote location. Where the device identifies what's being worked on. And guides the technician to perform the task using a heads up display and written or spoken instructions. The headset could be used for simulations and demos. A $3,500 headset's target audience is not the general public. Just some random thoughts.
I'm surprised they didn't understand this. I get Scott's point about stuff on your face, but this technology is about new ways to input into the human brain. It's got a long way to go, and it needs a killer app and refinement to go mainstream, which requires developers to be able to access the tech. $3500 is cheap for that access.
Sad as it is, the next phase of human evolution is attaching an iPhone to your face.
And it should be mentioned, the killer app for this will never be allowed by Apple, the same killer app that drove everything from VHS, to lots of internet tech like efficient streaming, and secure online payments. (Adult entertainment).
They marketed it as a consumer tech product and Scott has a correct assesment of you wouldn't want to put this on your face. They showed no usecase of it being for work. Hololens is fantatsic but its a work device. They were showing people enjoiying being with their kids but wearing a headset. None of this makes any sense. Xreal makes normal looking glasses that do most of what Apple showed their headset for, and it costs 1/10th the price.
His co host utterly failed to mention this. Because his co host largely kisses his ass.
My condolences to your son for being a Tottenham fan.
I think Scott underestimates how much of an impact Apple's Vision Pro will have on the future of computing.
Scott thinks we don't want to put things on our heads. ... While wearing headphones.
Really appreciate this podcast.
Scott is direct, not always right, but puts it out there...
And do think he is right about engaging with Saudi's, and India... bring home the $$$
Scott and Ed🎉🎉 your observations are sharp and clear.
I really appreciate your competence and intelligence. Playing hard ball means being agile in mind and body.
Stay healthy and enjoy your day 😊
No gretaer podcast can weave in the innuendo of “nuts and bolts” amongst relevant and informative news amalysis.
That phrase was definitely comedy gold
I agree with Scott regarding the lifestyle quality I infer from headsets but one should note that there was a time when we all enjoyed the social experience of going to a record store, enjoying cover art and generally enjoying music with friends, showing off your record collection…not to mention going to movie theaters…and that this has been totally disrupted by “personalized” entertainment devices starting with the Sony Walkman almost 50 years ago and refined to great profit by…you guessed it…Apple.
Best show on RUclips!!
Ready for some hot takes.
Past Apple Product Failures-
The LISA
The Apple Newton.
Apple Pippin.
Round Mouse.
The Apple Macintosh Portable.
The Power Mac G4 Cube.
The U2 iPod.
Apple eMate.
Macintosh TV.
Apple on iPad: We have developed technology to not have the iPad to close to your eyes. Apple Vision Pro: We have put 4kHD screens on your pupils!
Totally agree with the headsets, too niche..
hi scott, your words are entertaining but by spending your time, what outcomes are you hoping to give to listeners?
Why you gotta do Hyundai like that?? The new ones look pretty good.
Keep up the good work chaps -- Oliver, Liverpool fan in Virginia
Wishful thinking does not equal good future predictions. I tried the Vision Pro, amazing, getting one as soon as I can. According to Zuck (rumors) Apple is manufacturing 1 million Vision Pro units.
America does not need another car for rich people It needs a car for the people in the middle. Put 20% down, pay it off in 3 years, and not exceed 8% of your income. And don't forget "Right to Repair".
Scott, it’s typhoid Mary… Love you
I remember all the pundits criticizing the Ipad when it came out, no one could imagine what it was for. Its hard now to see what the Vision Thing is for, but maybe something interesting will become obvious in a year.
How TF Scott going to talk about Game Stop and not Mention “Short Squeeze”? Glib
Hope Prof G brings back the thirst traps 🔥😂
Think of the Vision like the Mac Pro - niche market for niche applications (at least for now). Apple is keeping this out there to see what devs will do - the iPhone wasn't great till the Apps came along. Apple is very aware that anything like this will need an app market to make it work.
Gotta disagree with Scott about the potential success of Apple Vision Pro. What we saw at WWDC was great but we must remember this product doesn't come out for another year,. .so there's plenty of time still for Development and big-name vendors to flesh out potential ideas. (AutoCad, ArcGIS, etc,. would all look amazing on this thing). The Augmented-Reality aspect of this (being able to see both VR and Real World stuff simultaneously).. will seal the deal on this. Apple's typically support timeline is "5 to 7 years".. so I don' think it's going to go unsupported in 1 to 2 years. Improvements and software-updates to this over the next year or 2,. should be pretty amazing.
$3500 for goggles that will leave you even more depressed and suicidal. The more time this is on your head, the more you want it all to end. The coolness factor on this is -3500. Some sexy glasses that give you the world is a decade away. This century is much sadder and alone then the last one. This doesn't change that.
@@jimbell6116 This is no different than any other technology or tool,. each person still has to remember moderate and sensible use. If you allow yourself to use it for unhealthy amounts of time,. that's a human-choice failure,.. not a technology failure.
This is informative and funny
I agree with Scott on Saudi.... No point attempting to defeat MBS when you have Desantis running amuck in Florida
Why is there no LVMH for iphone or the app store? Billionaires and front line workers have access to the same iPhone 14 pro max. Is tech truly an equalizer?
i agree with the liv-pga assessment. if the end goal was to sell out, at least fight for a high price, admonish saudi, and get all of your players taken care of. but to invoke 9/11 and then sell out anyways is some next level tactics lmao
Well, one of us is wrong about Apple's Vision Pro headset, and I think it's you.
Scott I think you are correct Apple would have a great product releasing a car. The only problem: NO car company has spare electric car manufacturing capacity! Maybe in 10 years...
Also phones for $2k might be Apple's thing but there will be no volumes moved at a $200k car!
I believe The headset is a way to test a new computing interface (that’s why it’s named Spatial Computing) and not Meta’s perspective on a social VR/AR device. The price point compares more with a top line computer than where the VR/AR headset market is at…the declining sales of LapTops de -risks cannibalization and provides an exploration on a new way to engage your computing interface vs keep investing in a declining laptop market…IMO…
Prof was way off base on CNN... even if the objective was to bring it back to the center, which it arguably wasn't, the execution was abysmal. The real issue is the 24/7 news model is inherently flawed.
I think Prof G was just pragmatically talking about CNN as a media outlet that caters to a neutral/liberal demographic, he doesn't have any expectation that it will broadly reshape US political discourse.
You're right, just repeating the news every 1/2 hour was never going to work.
That's what Rupert Murdoch realised - sell rage and anger to a population that's angry and frustrated with their politicians.
How was Costa Rica, Ed??
I have the biggest crush on Ed! :)
I will remember your prognostication regarding Apple Vision Pro
And i will remember your a fan boi
For everyone who wants apple to make a car, I have one question. What kind of Apps will Apple sell for the car? That is where apple makes it money, the App store. Everything they do is to keep milking the app store. Maybe there is a good subscription they could sell.
The problem with the effects of social media such as Facebook/Meta on developing minds is that while it appears empirical and compelling, it can't (yet) be provable or measured in any tangible way---whereas evidence of financial fraud (in the case of Holmes) can be. Yes, teen suicides are up, but there is no provable direct correlation of this to social media alone. There's enough cause in the age we live in to increase depression and anxiety (see: burgeoning income inequality, climate change, et al).
To keeps things in perspective for the cost of a VisionPro, you could buy a decent older car.
39:55 I wonder if Scott is aware that some of these "AI Catastrophists" are people like Sam Altman and Ilya Sutskever, two of the most powerful people in AI right now.
So no more Bill Maher on CNN when strike over? He was smart enough not to fuck with Fareed. TY Prof G & Ed.
Isn’t buying your way to success the American Way?
Oh wait. The Saudi’s did it? We can’t have that! Double standards anyone?
C'mon Scott, CNN under Zucker was a train wreck. By the time he left the ratings were in the dumpster, all the Fox shows beat them up and down the time slot, all day, every day. Even MSNBC and RUclips beat out CNN. They needed to make a change.
This is always worth viewing for its analysis and insight. However, I think Scott has begun to take on a bit of a bias from the standpoint of a high-income consumer of luxury goods. There is nothing wrong with this, as far as it goes. But it does relate to only a portion of the marketplace. How he views products and services might be different from how Ed or some random man or woman on the street might view these.
Rehash of last weeks Pivot pod
Yes, but without Mrs Yappy Yappy Go Ahead. I’ll take this version every time 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Seems everyone who has actually tried it comes away shocked and amazed and convinced. The only doubters seem to be those who haven’t put one on yet. Maybe worth reserving judgment until
You try one. 🤷🏻♂️
Apple vision isn’t designed to be a fashion statement. It’s mostly an entertainment device used in the confines of your home. You may not like it, but that’s how it is.
Prof G 's prediction and analysis to business world is usually spot on but when it's about tech, whether it's vision pro or EV industry , he just lacks the in depth knowledge to make any reasonable preduction. USD$3500 is about the same price as a high end TV or laser 4k projectors or a highend gaming PC. Vision pro is a super highend personalized TV + PC combined. It can be a personal theatre, a personal cubicle for working. When you think of it this way, it's not that expensive. But then, i am sure Apple is working on a cheaper non-Pro Vision version.
So Scott wants regular glasses with ar/ai called "Cyrano"
Ahh.. this is late, Man City already won the treble.. :( You all should also cover Saudi Arabia and oil rich middle eastern countries trying to buy soccer/football clubs..
👍👍👍
Hi guys... might be missing the point a bit on 'Apple Glass' 1.0 ...and the sad sour grapes faces? Maybe some VR trauma in there.
Crypto is fools gold, period!
I really hope you got some payout on your personal rebrand of Saudi Arabia by only referring to it as "The Kingdom".
I forecast 1mill Vision Pro unit next year
I don't think Apple should manufacture cars---they should team up with an established global player like Toyota or Volkswagen a co-produce electric cars with them.
doing risky VC business in China at this point is just pure fools gold, good luck to them burning money
The "coolest city in Latin America"... Lol. But yeah for many...
I think the apple vr is great
Besides the usual weakly crying on crypto, it is a fine episode like every week :) thanks
"The term “security” means any note, stock, treasury stock, security future, security-based swap, bond, debenture, evidence of indebtedness, certificate of interest or participation in any profit-sharing agreement, collateral-trust certificate, preorganization certificate or subscription, transferable share, investment ..."
SEC registers so that the sec knows it's supposed to oversee it and keep watch. The registration is saying "hey, the thing we do might require oversight". Just like drug dealers like Purdue and Pfizer were IPO'd drug dealers. Jpm is a registered fraud, wells Fargo same thing. Registered companies can do illegal things, but right now they're only penalizing coinbase and binance for not regustering when they clearly knew they were trading securities because they mentioned it point blank as a risk in their IPO filing.
I’d disagree on apple being an obvious winner in the car market. I think Tesla’s edge in engineering talent and design vs the other OEM’s is being undersold here, as well as just how difficult cars are to manufacture profitably. Tesla’s the only OEM that’s figured out how to make money right now on their EV offerings, and by quite some margin.
I would have agreed with you on this 2-3 years ago, but a few things have changed my views on Tesla:
Their margins are now more in line with other auto manufacturers, Musk has seriously harmed the brand with years of over promising and way under delivering on multiple fronts; Musk showing his true nature and poor management skills via Twitter (plus the text leaks) making some of us reconsider our existing vehicle reservations and whether we'd want to be associated with Musk; Plus Tesla-specific issues such as quality control, privacy, safety, vehicle service experience friction. So I think the magic time for Tesla is past and others in the space are iterating on their success. And that's Apple's jam: taking what someone else has done and tweaking and repackaging it to enhance the presentation and post purchace experience, increase perceived value and drive demand for being associated with them.
Low risk low calorie life….
Don't forget tha Sequoia is tainted by FTX!!
It's the coolest city in latin America and it happens to be in America?"
I love how Scott defends LIV buying PGA, without ever considering the fact that it won't improve the game at all. It will have the opposite effect. But as long as he'd be ok cashing their check, who the fuck cares. It's this self-focused capitalist view that ruins everything eventually.
If hosting a trump townhall filled where only trump supporters are allowed to express their opinion was "moving to the middle" i d hate to know what moving to the far right looks like - what was next on the plan? talking points with Putin? Why the N*zis weren't that bad? I'm not sure the CEO knew what the middle looked like and mistook bothsidism as the middle.
Sad commentary on the fact you are okay with the Saudis buying the PGA Tour and excusing their human rights nonsense. I gotta strongly disagree with you on this.
This week's AI Poem: There once was a teacher so sketchy, Whose tropes were worn out and stretchy, She’d drone on and on, Till the students were gone, And the class was left feeling quite wretched.
@@EasyTiger.01343 What make you think he has day job?
The jokes are just bad... anyway, another great podcast 😅
‘Go back…’ -prof g, ‘stick with the finances, your political analysis is truly abominable.’ - me
You are in desperate need of a joke writer. DM me.
Nut and bolt was solid material 😂
I’m sick of this 58 year old divorcee championing luxury brands and bashing tech. He was wrong about Tesla, I bet he’s wrong about AR and the vision pro 22:30
Horrendous take on Saudi and LIV/PGA golf from Scott.
Ed is struggling with crypto and hes comparing it to cartels. Lol
Dude, if he just toned down the blatant mid life crisis and/or fusion of frattastic has been/ wannabe bad boy persona. And upped the actual academic analysis...he might get a show!
But I'm here for the cringe. Best of luck pulling that tinder gal with an onkyfans.
Ed take on crypto was 🤌🏿🤌🏿🤌🏿🤌🏿
Smart kid
The kid cohost is utterly useless as far as providing good information. He just nodd and says "yup" at whatever shirtless scotty says.