Who Fact-Checks the Fact-Checkers?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 23 мар 2021
- Another edited stream clip.
Full Archive: • Responding to Akuma vi...
My Twitter: / hqrubbish
Thanks to the patrons who helped make this video possible.
Kaijuninja
KBD
SherlockHolmesBoy
Cinroth
Lyoh
Razz
#FightingGames #Akuma #Measuredresponse #FGC 
Развлечения
I won't be fact checking any comments on this video, so go buckwild with your speculation.
It's literally "dO yOuR oWn ReSeArCh" and "LoOk It Up BrO, iT's ToTeS lEgiT", but applied to fighting games. Unsurprisingly, it's just as exhausting and frustrating there as it is everywhere else.
debate me bro
The akumulated filth of all their midcrush and jumping will foam up about their waists and all the Rubbishes and Akumers will look up and shout 'Lab it?'...and I'll look down and whisper 'No.
It's all the Comedian's (Jeffrey Dean Morgan aka Negan) fault.
Still waiting for the day, when one these people will be like:"Sry, mb." Guess that´ll never happen.
Truly is disheartening and makes it even harder to imagine us ever reversing course on a lot of problematic tendencies in our community.
I think it's pretty clear that Wu is from the future where all their statements are true and you need to catch up to their precognition bro.
The time traveller meta is oppressive
We call them parrots not fact checkers
Who parrots the parrots?
Seemingly everyone.
- presents metric statistics from all channels, missing high viewership youtube charts
+ acknowledged that some videos like "Jojo's bizarre adventure system guide" hit algorithm
- doesn't acknowledge general click evasion of thumbnails
- doesn't acknowledge that most videos that hit algorithm don't hit demographic
- doesn't acknowledge that one video per day is uniquely fast and compares it to one video per week or slower releases
- doesn't acknowledge that one GOOD video per day is unique also
- doesn't acknowledge that measured response has algorithm and high amount of subject matter go over the heads of demon commenters
- Measured response can be understood if viewed up close
- doesn't acknowledge forced misunderstanding of reality
- doesn't acknowledge biased thinking also works for measured responses to force misunderstandings of reality
- doesn't acknowledge delayed brain activity of viewers when trying to warp reality after their own bias
- 1 + 1 = not 1
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
"Who bamboozles the bamboozlers? I've got it covered"
Everyone is Akuma specialist besides Akuma players.
WOW! I randomly found this channel - But what high quality arguments and editing! Earned your sub!
Happy to have you on board Senator.
lmaoooooooooo just pointing out my critizisim
Aren't g-clef cannon-like moves also 10f CH moves? Julia, Bears (theirs launches), Maven, Lars all have it. Leroy has 1,2,1+2 string as a 10f CH string. Law has a 10f high-crush launcher in d2,3, although it is launch-punishable on block unlike Akuma's d1,2.
Most gclefs only knockdown. Comparing Akuma 1,1 x hado fadc_lk/EX tatsu that is twitch confirmable to bears launch punishable f111 (f11 also -15) is a bit in akuma's favour. Law d2 is 11f.
- A thing you didn't acknowledge is that d3 clean hit mix is very hard to backdash for certain characters after blocking close WR3 oB. The bot will backdash it perfectly with most characters in most situations but doing it as the player makes it incredibly hard with characters like Asuka.
+ You didn't acknowledge and update your video after Akuma's damage got nerfed now so now all the data is more in Akuma's favour than it is in reality.
- You browse Tekken Zaibatsu so you're not a real person
- You don't play Akuma in Capcom vs SNK 3 so your opinion on Akuma is irrelevant
Thank you for going through more stuff. So when close as possible, you can punish FUFT4 with df3.
I remind that it was you who started generalising stuff based on singular examples. And you now at least give examples that are counter to your side, while still giving arguments to help with your side. So I guess we made progress.
Maybe if you look at all characters and all + situations, you also find that forced d3 mixups might also exist. I recall there also being states in the game where you are more than +9, where opponent can only block freely, but not move like backdash... Hints: universal tech rolls and quick back rolls from spikes, ballerina stuns from spin moves, Akuma-specifics: fjump d3, maybe meaty wr3?, hado fadc for instance.
The whole problem with the previous video was, as said in multiple occasions, that it only covers the easily-debunked arguments. Kinda like how this one focuses mostly on attacking me through the easily-exemplified points and your view and doesn't really look at the other side of all the positive examples you could find of my research with a few minutes of looking through said TZ :)
Now with more thorough-checking we find that hey, at some frames of jump/dflip you do evade mids "generally". The problem really is that checking a couple of mids out of hundreds if not thousands of moves is not a basis for you to generalise stuff to your argument's benefit only.
We acknowledge that 1,1 and d12 are uniquely strong tools in Tekken. Whee more progress!
why don't you answer my texts anymore? I miss you baby, the way you held me felt like I was the most important person in the world
“Les gooooooo” - DaBaby
"The whole problem with the previous video was, as said in multiple occasions, that it only covers the easily-debunked arguments. Kinda like how this one focuses mostly on attacking me through the easily-exemplified points and your view and doesn't really look at the other side of all the positive examples you could find of my research with a few minutes of looking through said TZ :)
Now with more thorough-checking we find that hey, at some frames of jump/dflip you do evade mids "generally". The problem really is that checking a couple of mids out of hundreds if not thousands of moves is not a basis for you to generalise stuff to your argument's benefit only."
That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence - Christopher Hitchens.
She went over examples and found your statement to be false, why should she have to go through hundreds of scenarios when you're the one who is spouting nonsense with no proof. Show the "General" mid evasion, show the D3 mixups, show the "more thorough-checking". You say that "we made progress" but you haven't proved anything, you're just gloating and using immature sarcasm. All this just because 1/8 of your points were acknowledged while the others were debunked... Grow up, and look up the definition of "general" while you're at it.
@@trekaelmajors986 watch Awais Honey run in WUFL :)
@@trekaelmajors986 Some statements work in some situation while not in others. That's not "false" so maybe look that definition up hue hue.
If a move goes over mid X on frame Y generally, it does so then. #notallmids but still, it does for some mids. This game doesn't have a property for mid evasion, it's just hurtbox interaction.
We made progress in that Rubbish doesn't just cherry-pick stuff to gloat and undermine people and we made progress on understanding situations and possibilities more thoroughly.
If you know how to count you'll see it's now a bit more than 1/8. Thank you for this ad hominem letter.
You do avoid mids. Just not when you're immediately in someone's face.
A lot of these are true and you're nitpicking them. Of course you're "not checking comments" lol.
Ah most of the comments are calling you wrong.
Good. There is some sense among players. Christ.