NOOB TRAP - Su-33 Dev Server - War Thunder

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 дек 2024

Комментарии • 52

  • @BulletRain100
    @BulletRain100 3 часа назад +9

    The Su-33 suffers from being one of the most neglected aircraft in Russia's arsenal. It was born from the wild dream of the Soviet Navy contesting the US Navy on the open seas and that dream died with the Soviet Union. The only reason it ever became operational is that Russia had a working carrier and needed a plane for it even if it was all for show. The Admiral Kuznetsov has no real strategic value so no real focus was put on the Su-33 to modernize it to be more competitive. This means no active radar missiles, no anti-ship missiles, and no guided weapons.
    The final nail in the coffin came from the Indian Navy. The Indians refitted a Soviet carrier and were looking for a plane to use on it. They chose the Mig-29K over the Su-33 so that program got the funding and support to produce a much more competent naval aircraft. The Russians decided to replace their Su-33s with Mig-29Ks as well, and the Su-33s will be retired when they reach the end of the airframe's lifespan.
    The Su-33 could have been saved by the Chinese, but they just bought a discarded Su-33 prototype from Ukraine and reverse-engineered it into the J-15. A joint project would have seen an updated Su-33 developed that Russia probably would have bought as well. It also would have helped the Chinese because they do have some issues in building aircraft, and the J-15 has demonstrated some serious teething issues that the Su-33 did not.

    • @PickledPear1017
      @PickledPear1017 2 часа назад

      The soviets lost the kuznetsov to Ukraine when they were becoming independent and when the citizens of Ukraine were voting Russians stole it back but they didn’t have the infrastructure to maintain the carrier
      It also had very unreliable arresting cables which would frequently snap when su-33s or MiG-29k were landing on it making the other pilots unable to land then running out of fuel and having to eject
      The aircraft carrier broke down many times and had to be towed my a tug boat through rough weather
      The only successful aircraft carrier operation for the Russians was in Syria

    • @Garagrim
      @Garagrim Час назад

      😭

  • @Sev07Sniper.
    @Sev07Sniper. 4 часа назад +34

    If only Carriers were even remotely used in game other than 1 sim map that never comes up and test flights. Thank god we have anti ship missiles that have no uses.

    • @bradthelad998
      @bradthelad998 4 часа назад

      They should be in air RB I genuinely don’t understand why gaijin haven’t added them I swear they had maps in the past that did which you took off from and basically acted as airfields

    • @2goober4u
      @2goober4u 4 часа назад +2

      I DONT CARE GIVE ME THE DAMN EXOCETS

    • @Sev07Sniper.
      @Sev07Sniper. 4 часа назад +1

      @@bradthelad998 They did, I'm pretty sure. I'm really not sure why arcade get different maps with more features than RB. Rb is just swing by kill bases and some tanks. ARB Has boat targets too

    • @TylerJC40
      @TylerJC40 3 часа назад

      @@bradthelad998they did and still do but this only applies to lower tiers also most top tier jets come from the land based Air Force not their naval Air Force so not many top tiers are capable of taking off and landing on carriers in a more conventional and normal way (but like fucking hell that stoped the average Warthunder player from trying)

    • @warhog258
      @warhog258 2 часа назад

      @@bradthelad998 They were in Air RB, but they made the Baku way too overpowered, thus users of the Yak-38 could just sit at their carrier as it mauled everything within 8km of it. Only the Baku had protection while the other carriers were just sitting ducks for their aircrews.

  • @warmeggtm
    @warmeggtm 4 часа назад +6

    I feel like the Kuznetsov is gonna suffer the same fate as the Baku and be removed within a month

    • @TylerJC40
      @TylerJC40 4 часа назад

      When did they remove the Baku

    • @warmeggtm
      @warmeggtm 4 часа назад

      @ they removed it as a spawn point for the Yak-38 within like a month or two of it being introduced on Spain (Alt)

    • @TylerJC40
      @TylerJC40 4 часа назад +1

      @@warmeggtm oh damn huh I wonder if the same thing happened to the USS Forstall because I remember it being on the map Malta and and I took off from it in my naval cougar (forgot which one)

  • @Sev07Sniper.
    @Sev07Sniper. 4 часа назад +5

    Honestly we need top tier Naval. We have so many different Naval Fighters, We have Functional Carriers, We have Anti-Ship Missiles but they're all not used how they should be because of how limited Carrier usages are and how low tier Naval is in comparison

    • @dinosaure_jr4595
      @dinosaure_jr4595 4 часа назад

      I agree. I have th feeling they mis out on some huge potential since it seem like they use most resources for air and ground. And in the end were going to miss out on something

    • @TylerJC40
      @TylerJC40 4 часа назад

      @@Sev07Sniper. I agree with you but unfortunately it’ll be way harder to balance top tier/modern-ish naval in war PC/console version(being one) because it was moderately difficult to do so on war thunder mobile even with the HP system they use so on the system regular warthunder uses it would be like top tier air lots of missiles being spammed and a lot of one hit kill even with all the ordnance interception systems vehicles at this proposed mode and BR would have

  • @Gabe-vw6rm
    @Gabe-vw6rm 4 часа назад +1

    "What place in the game does this actually have??"..... in my heart :(

  • @nemoclavon566
    @nemoclavon566 52 минуты назад

    Trap heavy and no countermeasures attempted scamming

  • @guimbitencourt
    @guimbitencourt 4 часа назад +4

    At least now I hope Su-47 Berkut will be a TT vehicle and not a Squadron vehicle, just like Mirage 4000 (since both are prototypes)

    • @TylerJC40
      @TylerJC40 3 часа назад

      Well I find it iffy on the state it could come in, but they could add it with the proposed weapons it was supposed be equipped with if it went to production that being the R-77 and R-73, they’ve done it before, the only reason they don’t give the Yak-141 it’s proper weapons R-73&R-77 is because of its prototype status and the fact that it was built to also carry the R-27&R-60 series of missiles and they think it’s in a more balanced position using them instead of the more accurate “if it actually went into production” weapons (R-73&R-77)

  • @uncleruckus69420
    @uncleruckus69420 4 часа назад

    5:54 if this is how it’s released with that weapon setup im not touching it, there’s literally no benefit or gain from aside from flying a different SU

  • @star2buk
    @star2buk 4 часа назад

    I imagine this will be really fun on the 12.0-13.0 or 12.3-13.0 days for air sim

    • @nelsonh.9651
      @nelsonh.9651 3 часа назад

      except it's a 13.3 since gaijin somehow thinks it's better in sim than RB while 13.3 is 100% in the same bracket with toptop tier :)))))))))

  • @emilelerate6454
    @emilelerate6454 4 часа назад

    Far as i know, the SU-33 should only have 2 guided weapons, both of which are anti ship missiles. No guided bombs or missiles.

  • @battle_tanck
    @battle_tanck 4 часа назад

    Honestly i love the First su 27 and the 33 Is that but with two more missiles

  • @dinosaure_jr4595
    @dinosaure_jr4595 4 часа назад

    They should have added this right after the su27 and f15a were released. Also just in the normal tree. Sad its becoming this now… Gould already help if its a normal tree vehicle because Russian mains will know how to use it and what to expect

  • @Nawrotsien
    @Nawrotsien Час назад

    If only they fixed the flight models

  • @uncleruckus69420
    @uncleruckus69420 4 часа назад

    Wait when is this next update coming out? Within the next few days or?

    • @Dice504dt9
      @Dice504dt9 4 часа назад

      Probably next Tuesday

    • @uncleruckus69420
      @uncleruckus69420 4 часа назад

      @@Dice504dt9ahhhhhh shhhiiiii thanks brother🤣💪🏽!!

  • @thelegendarysin6647
    @thelegendarysin6647 4 часа назад

    I love the su33 it's my favorite jet, I got 5k hours on the game can't wait to bait people into getting killed by me

  • @Jmoney422haha
    @Jmoney422haha 4 часа назад

    Kuznetsov needs more smoke. Wayyyyyyyy more smoke.

  • @finnthewastebin1503
    @finnthewastebin1503 5 часов назад

    What's up

  • @Mr.Maus.Thunder
    @Mr.Maus.Thunder 3 часа назад

    Your money is funny 69 911

  • @nelsonh.9651
    @nelsonh.9651 3 часа назад

    don't worry, gaijin believe it's much better in sim so it's 13.3 just as basic SU27 with a dogshit radar :)))))))))))))))))

  • @akaira700
    @akaira700 2 часа назад

    Great more trash low lvl gonna ruin top tier once

  • @BugattiONE666
    @BugattiONE666 4 часа назад +2

    The Gripen last a couple of months, the F-15E lasted the nearly a week, the Rafale and Typhoon didnt even make it a live....
    Heres a squadron vehicle for russia.....

    • @flatmarssociety5707
      @flatmarssociety5707 4 часа назад +5

      what are you trying to say?

    • @Sev07Sniper.
      @Sev07Sniper. 4 часа назад

      You are really just talking nonsense

    • @BugattiONE666
      @BugattiONE666 4 часа назад

      @@flatmarssociety5707 that this game has become exhausting, *Get new shit, get it nerfed, russia still bad, repeat* And 2024 people still laugh at the notion of bias. Take the fucking THUMBNAIL, for the trailer. the update is literally called Storm Warning, as in 'Typhoon' but nope, Su33 is the face of the update......im just tired, so so tired of i, but on tell me im wrong i do not have hte metal strenth to try and understand you people any more

    • @TylerJC40
      @TylerJC40 4 часа назад

      @@Sev07Sniper. he’s talking about the nerfs to those vehicles and how long each went on before gajin nerfed them

    • @marshall-yo5ho
      @marshall-yo5ho 4 часа назад

      f15E only lasted one day after the update dropped