VERDICT REACHED: FL v Danielle Redlick - Wife On Trial For Murder Day 7
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 июн 2022
- A woman stands trial for allegedly murdering her stepfather-turned-husband, and giving authorities a flimsy story about him stabbing himself and having a heart attack. Danielle Redlick, 48, faces a count death of second-degree murder, and tampering with evidence for allegedly killing Michael Redlick, 65.
The backstory between the couple is patently complicated. Michael’s second wife was actually Danielle’s mother. They allegedly married in the first place to get her better health coverage as she was dying of cancer.
“In fairness to Mike, Danielle’s mother was dying of cancer when they were dating,” an unidentified family friend told WFTV. “She had terrible insurance.”
The account is that he fell in love with Danielle after her mother died. They married, with Danielle becoming his third wife.
The union ended in bloodshed. Danielle Redlick called 911 the morning of Jan. 12, 2019. She allegedly told police that her husband got angry on the night of Jan. 11, took a bite out of her McDonald’s burger, and spit it at her face. He allegedly grabbed, pushed her to the ground, and rubbed his fist against her face while shoving her head to a stove, she allegedly said. This culminated in her grabbing a knife, but he grabbed it, and made “stabbing motions” at himself. She allegedly claimed to try to hide in the bathroom, while her husband was at the door apparently referencing the movie Cape Fear.
She claimed to find him outside in the living room, badly hurt, cops said. Defendant Redlick allegedly claimed she tried to save him using CPR. She couldn’t find her phone to call the police, and she collapsed in exhaustion next to Michael, she said. Danielle woke up the next morning, and finally called 911, she allegedly said.
But authorities said she was on a dating app about two hours before calling 911. The state of Michael’s body also allegedly didn’t match her story. Contrary to her account, an investigator said they found no signs of Michael vomiting, and that the bruising on his left arm was consistent with defensive wounds. He had fingernail impressions on his left forearm and a bruise on the inside upper lip of his mouth. There were no signs of a heart attack, no signs of bruising consistent with CPR, and his ribs were intact, authorities said.
Those who knew the couple allegedly said Danielle had a foul temper. Even their children allegedly said she was the one who usually started fights in the relationship.
Officials said that Michael Redlick had sustained a fatal stab wound to his torso, likely dying in minutes.
#DanielleRedlick #RedlickTrial #LawAndCrimeNetwork
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Channel B: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel C: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel D / @lawandcrimebodycam 
Развлечения
Disgraceful! Should be released immediately.
She will be released. She has a $15k bond. Once she pays that, she’s free until sentencing.
@@BratKat904 what if she can't pay? Why would they keep her if the max sentence can not exceed the time she already spent?
@@natcontractors It sounds like bail had already been set at $15k previously. A bail bondsman can use collateral like a home, car, etc for the $15k and all she would most likely need would be $2k out of the $15k and she’s out. That can be done on most people’s credit cards! lol If she doesn’t have $2k grand, then she’s SOL but she seemed pretty dang happy to me so I believe she does.
@@natcontractors I agree with you. To make her post bond in order for her to be released is absolutely crazy imo.
@@BratKat904 of course she is happy, she was found not guilty for the first charge, but I still think they should've just let her go with no bond if the maximum sentence is served already.
Best wishes, Danielle. May your life be blessed and may you have the love and support of your children. The Judge should have let you out today -- very bad decision. Stay strong!
Pretty sure she got out on bond today. Trust me. Kind people put up the $1500
@@justmewendy6461 I sure hope so!
@@justmewendy6461 I hope so but wasn't it $15,000?
@@Debbie.Softie They only need 10% cash = $1500.00 for $15K bond. I’m so happy she was acquitted on the murder charges. Be well my friend. Sending light and love from Southwestern Ontario, Canada 🇨🇦🙏💖🙏🇺🇸
@@CanadianSquatchgirl Thank you so much! Sending love and peace from Nova Scotia! ❤
I'm so relieved for Danielle. The jurors got it right.
This judge is clueless. Was she ever truly an attorney? Clearly, she should have been released with time served.
I am so happy about the verdict.
Can you explain me why she has to still in jail? ( I can not wash the video, only write and read). Thanks
A buyest judge , who probally did not agree with the verdict.. she has let her personal feelings cloud her judgment …
@@rouman7 UPS. I know what you mean. THANKS.
My understanding
If she pays bond then she out
...I would contribute
Her bond is only 15K and she pays %10 of that. She could be out today. I hope so.
I just learned about Danielle Redlick yesterday when I watched her testify. I could totally tell she was innocent. The judge definitely should have released her, as soon as she was found not guilty of murder. I don’t see how the tampering conviction’s sentence could even equate the the amount of time she’s already spent in jail. Not a very smart judge.
We saw her smile when she realized she had a bond put up for that. She's being processed out as I type. Thank God.
Totally agree, incompetent judge
Shame on that judge. I could tell she was bias through the whole trial. Giving the defense a very hard time. So happy Danielle was found not guilty.
@@justmewendy6461 'processed out' means released? Excuse me, English is not my first language.
@@justmewendy6461
This is good to hear
I would have contributed
For her to get out
Horrible that she was even kept in handcuffs leaving the courtroom! This judge was unfair. She should have been released today!
@@bluegreybaby She's already bee in for 3 ½ years tho.
Good job, jurors. You got this one right!!
Yes, jurors 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 and that 3 times "thank you!" from Danielle to you guys, that was beautiful wasn't it? 😭❤️❤️❤️
I knew it! Not guilty. She was a very believable witness. Even during the harsh cross examination, she did very well.
I am so happy for her, seeing her smiling that’s priceless. Her Male attorney nailed it. 👍
Yes! I was scared for her if the female attorney had done the closing!
100% agree. Her counsell did an amazing job, especially the guy attorney.
What about the other one? The lady who gave the opening statement hehehehe!??
I am glad the male lawyer stepped in. She was so bad she would have gotten her convicted.
Yes his closing was great and genuine.
SHE JUST GOT REALEASED!!!!!!!! Bless her heart!!!!!!! SO BRAVE!
Which part was brave? Don't get me wrong, I think this was the right verdict, but let's not glorify her. There's reasonable doubt about what happened, case closed, move on.
I’m very relieved that she was found not guilty. My gut told me that this was a horrible accident. I felt thru the whole trial that the judge was biased against the defense. She should have released her today and required she come for sentencing in august.
The judge was definitely very biased. Shame on her.
Feelings are not necessarily facts. Just because you "felt" the judge was biased doesn't mean she was. Also, if there was bias, you do know that's why the appellate courts exist, right? If the defense feels their client did not get a fair trial, they can appeal the case. They won't because there is no basis for that.
Biased judge. Period. Hope Danielle can get bonded out. So happy for the verdict!! 😊
I wasn't sure either way but wasn't persuaded by the prosecution. Feel so bad if she's kept in for another 2 months .
I didnt feel right about it either, it was a great verdict. She just needs to go through a bit more and it should be all over.
The Defense attorneys were great. I thought she was not guilty... it’s a great victory. I think she deserved a chance to go on with her children. The guy was an abuser. It was self defense.
Her children and Danielle will need counseling because the children might have feelings about her killing their father
@@janetyost7871 yes.
Justice has been served. Release her immediately!
How did this judge get her position? The defence lawyer was so right: by law she could not be sentenced for tampering with evidence longer than the 3,5 years she already spent in jail. So she should be released today. The judge ordered her back to jail awaiting her sentencing while she is no Risk for society. Wtf, judge????
she has been there for years, she will be out in days, take it easy, all good
So TRUE
This judge is political. Period.
HORRID judge ! She hated Danielle from the first second and you can see that throughout the entire trial in her ruling. Shame on you, judge!!! Shame!!
@@sorinam4341 you nailed it !
WOW. I had no idea she was already in jail for 3 ½ years.
first time her emotion !! Happy for her she really spoke the truth took responsibly for her mistakes. Great Verdict .
Total respect to the jurors!!! They watched the whole trial folks...not a hit and miss as some of you proclaiming that you know something you don't know.
Apart from the 2 that fell asleep lol but yes they did a good job
@@sarahcooke193 Those 2 were replaced with alternates
Read her journals.
Completely disagree with the Judge not releasing today, she has served over 3 years and that is clearly not more than she would receive for tampering, victim impact statements regarding tampering are pointless….
I agree, but is that what her attorney argued for?
@@holly_kay5570 yes, but it honestly felt like the judge sided with nearly anything prosecution said
Have they reached a verdict yet
I think she in essence bonded out.
@@lynn7854 yes, Not Guilty, but guilty of tampering
I was one of the very low percentage saying not guilty. What an awful and upsetting situation it’s been Danielle, may you now have peace and happiness with your son and daughter godbless 💖
Me too! I got dragged a few times in the live chat over it. Sometimes the mob just wants blood.
Me too! Luckily I never discussed it in the chat, but I always felt she was not guilty. God bless you Danielle and I hope you care repair your relationship with your children, so sorry you lost so much time with them.
Prosecutor & his sidekick were both very agressive even when speaking to her lawyers they could have shown abit of class instead of acting like schoolyard bullies
I agree the Male Prosecutor was definitely overly aggressive. But it was a strategy to rattle her and poke holes in her testimony by intimidating her.
Which wasn’t going to work bc she was used to being screamed at. He was very unprofessional. Esp when he threw the bag of evidence across the room. Smh
I AGREE!
Totally agree. Bullies they where.
So happy for the out come.
@@dhsgymnast05 GREAT point.
My heart goes for you, Danielle! I cried with you while hearing the verdict. God bless you and may He help you go on with your life in peace and tranquility!!!! Shame on the judge for putting her in jail further more even if she was found not guilty and even if she already served 3 years
I cried as well - I couldn't stop the tears! So happy for this verdict ♥
Me too ❤️😭
What a waste of tax payers money by putting her back in jail. Between this judge and the prosecutor there have been many things off. Luckily the juror saw through it.
Judges are always biased towards the state.
Agreed
agree the lady has served 3 half years all ready . totally waste of time
Totally a bad decision by the judge. She had her guilty for the whole trial. Hope she got bailed out.
This prosecutor is a sore LOSER!!! She has served her time!
He is a misogynistic AH.
Shame on the Judge and the State for wanting to keep her in jail to be sentenced. They could have just done it today and gotten it over with or let her l out until sentenced.
@@bluegreybaby The defense was the first to point out that family was entitled to a victim impact statement. Thought that was pretty classy. Is a judge ever allowed to release someone, but require them to come back for the statements?
I would hope the Judge would revisit her calendar and the ADA would re-evaluate his pre-sentencing investigation goals and come to a timely conclusion that no further incarceration is warranted. There is no reason to give her additional time for what she was ultimately convicted of doing, it serves no legitimate purpose in the pursuit of justice.
Totally agree. Unbelievable that freedom should depend on the judge's calendar!!
The realisation hits her right here is golden @ 3:09:22 it's as if the whole world is finally off her shoulders..
I haven't followed the trial & she looked innocent as the jury verdict was being announced. She tired & exhausted & she should of been release immediately since people are saying she already served over 3yrs in prison. I wish you the best life has to offer Danniel 💜
The judge should have released her. she had bond in place. Atleast taken the cuffs off.
i remember her on exaimation was talking about the time Mike driving the car into her, and she looked so battered that when was asked why she didn't report it, she answered like its daily business "it wasn't too big", wow! that told it all
For those in the comments and the live feed that are so quick to judge...we could speculate ALL day about things we feel she should have done differently. Do I agree she should have called 911 sooner, yes. However, some can say "I would've done this, I wouldn't have done that" the fact of the matter is until or unless you're placed in that situation, you've no idea the amount of shock that would set in, etc. If she intended to kill him, I believe she'd been able to stab him in a more precise location to accomplish that and probably would've stabbed him more than a single time. This world needs more compassion and less judgment. Let's come together and pray and provide words of encouragement for a mother and her 2 children to heal and hopefully at some point, overcome this tragedy. It is absolutely unfortunate the series of events that took place and that Jaden and Sawyer no longer have their father with them. I do however believe she in fact acted in self defense.
No one knows whats in our hearts Kristin, only God, so I wouldn't go so far as to say anyone was quick to judge, not even you
@@debbiehall7016 I'm referring to comments in the live chat such as "she's guilty as sin" or "crazy back on the streets" and worse...not simply people just voicing opinions...
I totally agree with everything that you have said. This poor woman has gone through enough. I pray her life will be a happy and peaceful one from now on.
Wow. One phrase comes to mind, only in America
Delighted for her great to see Justice was served. Did not expect that outcome. ☺️
Glad she has been found not guilty. I wish Danielle the very best going forward. I hope her relationships with her children heal, and she can find peace and happiness in her life. It was not premeditated, she reacted to a very bad situation with her husband, and I believe she did not want him to die, just to stop. A sad story , glad the jury did not make it sadder. I can understand how she made some bad decisions tampering with evidence, with not wanting to have killed him, she would have freaked out and been in shock. If she had wanted to kill him she would have done a better job of covering her tracks. Jury got it right.
If she was acquitted of the murder why would victim impact statements be relevant?
That’s a good question. The theory is that had she not tampered with it it, the outcome of the verdict may have been different.
@@superren8107 The jury's verdict was that she herself was the victim here.
So glad she was found not guilty. Very disappointed with the judge though.
Thank you jurors! 👏👏👏👏
Yay! Best wishes to you Danielle - I am so sad you had to go through such a horrific ordeal. Bless you!
I called it. Self-defense was clear as day in this case. The only mistake she made was what she did AFTER the self-defense. I'm glad justice was served fairly.
So pleased for Danielle, I was in tears with her, her legal team did a great job. God bless you Danielle
Why wasn't she released what's it got to do with her bond and if she's served more than the time she can be sentenced for
Why can't she be
I'm lost
I’m so happy for you Danielle 🤗 Enjoy your new life.
Thank God you did not accept the plea deal.
I thought she was nuts not to take the sweet plea deal - but - I watched some of the trail and in particular I watched the state’s attempt to impeach her on cross and it was pretty clear that the state could not remove all reasonable doubt. I was pretty impressed with her coolness under pressure - I know I could not find her guilty based on what I heard and saw.
Same here,
What was the Plea Deal offered?
@@superren8107 ten years
@@superren8107 10 years for manlaughter
Congratulations, Danielle!
I believed it was self defense. I'm soo glad the jury got it right. She was bonded out this evening. Her father picked her up. She wants to see her kids. Enjoy your freedom Danielle.
I'm honestly surprised that they took this to trial with those charges. Figured she would be found Not Guilty on main charge.
Agree about the verdict, but why not take it to trial. There was more than enough chance that she would be find guilty too, especially with the evidence tampering - cause nobody really knows what happened that night.
I hope she does well , that at some point her kids can forgive her & they can all heal and start rebuilding their relationship
Ya she did nothing, only killed their dad. 🤦🏻♂️
@@Chaoticvideo Oh please, he was attacking her and she rightfully defended herself. She just tried to stop him hurting her (again). There was no intent to kill.
@@theseagulls7035 lol
@@theseagulls7035 "Kill" is not defined by intent, you're thinking of murder.
@@Hankblue you get the gist, though.
Wonderful news!! Best wishes to Danielle. ❤️
I'm pleased for her. She deserves. Life without fear
Let's hope she gets some therapy or she will not understand life without fear
Oh oh "she can make bond and get out of jail today!"
So glad Jury made right decision.
That judge is a disgrace.
So pleased the right verdict was reached. I felt when she was testifying that I could read into her true nature, almost like I could read her soul ; which is very honest, very intelligent.There is pain there too from her past which she managed to overcome and build a new and successful life until he started acting possessive and jealous. Maybe her confidence had gone up and he didn't like it. She started out dependent and controllable because of her much younger age and her life situation and previous experiences. He taught her things, showed her things , gave her a lifestyle but then didn't want her to be free. His possessive jealousy entered the picture and he realised he couldn't control her like he used to, and then he got nasty and did not want her to have any of the benefits she had had in life. Up until this point it had not been obvious that these things were viewed as conditional by him; their withdrawal to be used as a weapon if she did not tow the line. This lady will go far. She needs to move away from doubters and haters, move states and go on with living the life that she deserves to have ; a peaceful and fullfilled life; build a great career for herself as she has the abilities.
I had the same impressions. I hope she finds peace and true love.
I totally agree with your assessment. Danielle was living in fear every day!!! Thank God she's finally free.
I’ve seen lots of comments in previous days how good the judge is, I personally have seen many times where I don’t think she has been fair.
I'm so thrilled for her
Congrats and best wishes Danielle! 💜🇨🇦
To think If she took the plea deal, good move bringing it to court pleased for her the right verdict was reached…..
Great point!!
What was the deal they offered?
@@superren8107 10 years manslaughter
Congratulations Danielle! 🥳🥳🥳🥳. I really hate that the judge decided it would take two months for sentencing. In the Ryan Duke case, his verdict of not guilty for murder but guilty for concealing a death, was read on a Thursday and his sentencing was done the following Monday! Such a shame on the Judge’s part. Hopefully, you can make your bond and get released. @Holly_Kay commented “Total respect to the jurors”, AMEN! I agree 100%. Only thing I was disappointed about was not ALSO getting to see the face of the cartoon-looking prosecutor, when the verdict was read. I felt like the Judge was very partial to the prosecutors and it was so frustrating to watch. So kudos to the jurors for seeing that the prosecutors had no evidence proving that it was not self defense! I’m sorry for you, Danielle, and your family that January 11, 2019 had to end the way it did, but if you had not gotten away from him, it would be HIM on trial, instead of you, for murdering his wife. I think everyone needs to just stop and let that sink in. Again, soooooo very happy for you and congratulations.
💯🥳🥳🥳
Every court is different as to when sentencing takes place. Sometimes it takes place immediately after verdict.
Yes, I agree agree the CAMERAMAN 🎥 for this Law & Crime channel should be FIRED!!
@@missysbloglife she already has credit for time served longer than the maximum sentence for her conviction. She has served more time than necessary. There is no reason for them to wait and do a sentencing hearing. She had served her sentence already plus more.
@@moonknightx5310 yes I agree, or at LEAST release her until the sentence hearing, which I suppose that’s what will happen IF she can make bail. I know Danielle was beyond thankful and relieved for the not guilty verdict, but you could just see the pure dread and disappointment of having to spend even ONE more second in that jail. I wish her attorneys had been more prepared to argue all and any possibilities that may arise, rather the verdict had been guilty or not guilty. Poor preparation on their part, IMO.
I’ll admit I’m SURPRISED of the verdict, and I did watch all the evidence
Get some eggs. It's great for stress.
Not me. I typically am guilty of presuming a defendant guilty initially. Not with this case. Everything she said happened lined up with the evidence and made sense. NOBODY knows how they would react if they accidentally killed their husband. One stab to the shoulder screams self defense in itself. She freaked out and made horrible decisions. Still doesn’t mean she wasn’t defending herself on what she did after.
I'm confused, did they provide evidence that he was physical during the incident ? Did she have any injuries or something ?
Same here, can't see why she wasn't found guilty of Manslaughter in the least
@@bluelemon9968 no injuries
If a man hits you once, LEAVE.
If -a man- _your partner_ hits you once, LEAVE.
No need to make it gendered. It's a good general rule.
@@blatherskite3009 in general, men are stronger. I said what I said. You write on your own comment and leave mine be.
This is UNBELIEVABLE! She should’ve been found guilty on ALL COUNTS!! What a HUGE miscarriage of Justice! SO disappointed!
The jury got it right. She also answered questions so honestly even when she knew it would make her look bad to be THAT honest. Rare.
People in the comments are really out her letting AH dictate every case as if all women are guilty now. No, AH was a lying plum, this woman however, I believed her account.
I agree, and wondered whether AH caused the mean spirited sentiments.
Is this your first time watching a trial verdict video or something? News flash, half the time people don't automatically side with the jury. The only people making it about AH are people obsessed with tribalism, there was no world in which someone guilty of tampering with evidence and lying multiple times about what happened was going to win any popularity contests.
@Estelle then why was she found to be lying
@Estelle Oh was she? Well however you 'looked into' the trial you didn't look close enough. I watched that entire trial it was absolutely clear that she was NOT a victim. The Jury also agreed
@@Hankblue gee thanks for laying it all out for us…🙄😆
As it should be. Just watched the first of this trial when the verdict came in, now I’m hooked, been watching since noon, so about 7 hrs worth, and I’m still looking for more of the trial videos. GOOD LUCK DANIELLE👍🏼☀️😘❤️. I wouldn’t have found her guilt of the second charge, because if he wouldn’t have been abusive to begin with, she wouldn’t have used a knife to defend herself. She was terrified, didn’t know what to do, this was not planned, she was NOT THINKING CLEARLY
All those people in the live chat yelling guilty guily.... He was roid raging..... Prayers and blessings to Danielle.... 💚🌴
and what was the prosecutor's excuse?
What a STOIC WOMAN most ppl couldn't have done as well as Yourself a TRUTH of a TRUE RIGHTOUS WOMAN the pressure you were under was immense Danielle you deserve happiness.
Love 💞 & Light to you and your children ..
NO MORE FEAR‼️
Not guilty on the murder charge.
Guilty on tampering with evidence.
Welp. Honestly the not guilty charge was not a verdict of innocence, just that there was some doubt and it is what it is
It means the state didn’t prove its case. Therefore reasonable doubt.
By the time they got set up this morning, that fast, not one could call her guilty without a lot of doubt or it would have taken much longer.
@@cjsrf9430
That’s how it works.
So I guess AH didn't destroy the me too movement!! Happy for you Danielle. Hope you can be at peace JD start over. Good luck 😊🙏
Shame on the judge to prolongue this woman's misery!!! I just cant believe this
She is innocent but I believe they hold her and sentence her at a different time so the victims(most likely family members of her late husband) can speak on his behalf. And unfortunately they have a right to that. I believe that's why the judge did that.
@@aHavenForTheLost she was found innocent though.
@@rachelwalsh6116 Right but she was found guilty on the other count. I really have no clue just lending my opinion on why the judge did what she did. They mentioned victim impact statements so maybe that's why.
@@aHavenForTheLost she was found guilty of tramping with evidence and she has already served three and half years. So she by law already served her time for the trampling with evidence
@@rachelwalsh6116 It's not tramping it's tampering with evidence. And I get all of that. But there must be a reason the judge postponed it. And like I already said the judge mentioned victim impact statements so who knows.
Right call. Grateful the jury saw the truth and justice was served.
Happy for her. Sorry she wasn't released today
Wait, she went through all that, spent years in jail, found not guilty and now she goes back because she has to be sentenced AGAIN for tampering with evidence? That makes no sense.
The defendant won this case all on her own. She was an excellent witness in her own defence. Owning up to some of her mistakes and allowing the prosecutor to take small ‘wins’ when questioning her was perfection. I am left wondering if she is very clever/devious or extremely genuine. Either way, it worked out well for her.
God Bless you Danielle! You are now free!
While I don’t understand the legal reasons why she is being held until sentencing she does have a bond. Fifteen thousand is pretty low unless it’s cash in full. I hope she can bond out or her legal team can provide case law in a motion to allow the judge legal basis to release her. I’m the meantime she has a lot of work to do to figure out how her life will go forward.
When she will be out ?
This trial and Danielle touched my heart very deeply . I pray she got out with the help of those kind friends.
I also said she was not guilty!!
who says you cant get away with murder?...Murder someone then spend 11 hours cleaning up the scene and come up with a good story
I agree. We'll never know what the evidence would have shown, she got away with murder. Her clapping at the end was disgusting. Karma will get her anyway.
We will see her on this channel again. The truth wasn’t presented in court. Ie her journals.
this judge decides to spend more tax money by keeping her in jail
Brilliant!! 👏💖🌻
Does a judge have the authority to release someone, but to require them to come back for the impact statement day?
So happy for her. Glad she didn’t take the plea. Cause she knew she was innocent. She testified cause she knew the true story. Evidence was exactly as expected with her description of the events. Just wish she could get her 3 1/2 years back she wasted behind bars. Should have never been arrested
The issue was the way she dint call the police and tried to clean up the blood
Judge should have released her, disgraceful she didn’t.
I didn't watch the entire trial but I dint understand how she's not guilty she stabbed him never got him help lied to 911, cleaned up evidence. Was on a dating site while her husband laid dead. I don't get it.
I agree. Floridians live in a world of their own though. The acquitted Casey Anthony for christ's sake. I'm not saying Danielle is guilty of murder. Manslaughter, if the jury had the option, should have been the conviction.
@@agnisarmaniote8630 right exactly but don't you find it weird that the children happen to be not home that night? And her demeanor was very strange. I didn't watch the whole trial so I don't want to say if she is or not but it's really unsettling to me. She even slept next to his dead body I mean I don't know what to do with that.
The Pee Wee Herman prosecutor walking out of the courtroom with his tail between his legs. Priceless!
Wow wow wow can't believe she has to sit in jail and not bond out till August that is absolutely RIDICULOUS!!!
Thank God! I knew nothing about this case until the trial. Once I heard her testify, I thought NOT GUILTY!! I’m surprised this judge decided to keep her in custody.
The judge is bound by the law, and can't presume the sentence before the sentencing. Danielle had a bond, she went free that day, that's all that matters.
@@ironcode the judge could have let her out on time served or OR.
Congratulations. You deserved it❤️❤️❤️
Best wishes Danielle 💜
Happy for her!
That verdict mean that eany one who want to kill his wife or her Husband just he should make sure to do it with one stubb and no Witnesses and clean the crime scene and just claim self défense and it should aply to man to .
I wonder if, in case of opposite gender, they would come to the same verdict. Doubting it.
@@claudiapank9762 they deffinally wouldn't . Those fiministe are just disgusting ''just beleive beleive all woman even if they abviously laying and the evidance prove them guilty
Thank God!
Wow!!! I did not see that coming! Although I didn't think there was enough evidence to convict her beyond a reasonable doubt. But figured the jury wouldn't see it that way.
The correct verdict in my opinion.
Why is this judge seem so clueless? Let her out of jail now.
She should be released
As I understand it, she will be. She has a $15,000 bond she can use, and then she’s free and only needs to return the day of sentencing.
Beyond a reasonable doubt, people! They had to prove she was intending for him to die without any proof of self defense. Like it or not, they couldn't prove it. She stabbed him during a fight and he went to the bathroom. Why would she check on the person who she was fighting off? Anyhow, I agree, she did "get away with (2nd degree) murder," but there wasn't enough evidence to convict her beyond a reasonable doubt.
I’m happy for her 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
I don’t know how to feel. I don’t want to judge. I don’t think it was ever intentional and that clearly wasn’t the states position either. I wouldn’t even want to convict her for the tampering had it not been for her actions following the event. I recognize severe duress will so crazy things to people, so I’m willing to take that into consideration, but her attempts to conceal and lie following the event is what was most suspect.
Judge just messed up by keeping her in jail. I think the 15,000 bond was made when she was charged with Murder.
Good verdict. She was credible and I think she didn't mean to kill him.
besides being in charge of proceedings in her courtroom a judge must also take into consideration fairness and compassion...in this case?, this judge has none...the jury has spoken so now it's time to be fair and reasonable
Danielle is a victim in this situation. She's now a survivor! She defended herself! She didn't stab her husband over and over! She stabbed him once!
The jury did an excellent job! 👏🏻
Danielle did a pretty good job on the stand. I wish she wouldn't have agreed with the prosecutor so much on answers she first said she didn't remember. I don't recall is an answer.
It bothers me so bad, when a victim is looked at as the perpetrator!!! She was a victim for many years. It seems her husband knew what to say and when to say it, to get her back. Just like when she talked about the divorce papers being served right after he smoothed things over in the bedroom!
I wish Danielle and her family, a long, happy life!!! 💞🤗💞
So glad! Good Luck, Danielle!!