Overall I did not like your musicality at this dance. I know you can do better which you did many times. I am comparing you with you. The other dancers in that room have no musicality at all. I did not like the song either. Not many breaks/changes, yes there are some, but the general feeling of the music was boring, and the volume of the singer's voice was the same during the whole song. Her spins were not perfect(body isolation, sharpness). But she is very flexible and I liked her trance at 0:13 :). Feels like she knows the song. Your moves at 1:30 started impressively(followed voice), but you could not continue as it should be. It is okay, this is a social dance :) What was the point of turning twice which starts at 1:57? The dance started very well and did not end well enough. I suppose you did not understand the song is ended :) The cameraman needs more practice. He was so stable/strict. The result would not be so different if you put the camera on a tripod.
Starting with the song, I loved it. All songs cannot have equal energy. I understand this song is calmer than you are used to listen. However, it has enough variations to make it interesting to dance with. Variety doesn't only mean volume change. The pitch of the vocal changes throughout the song. There are staccatos and legatos, accelerations and slowdowns. Focusing only on harsh breaks would be a naive approach to access quality of the song. Try to listen more carefully from this perspective :) 00:17 is a break, isn't it? 00:56 as well. Another break at 1:31. How many breaks you expect in 2 minutes? :) The original song has 2 million views and 76k likes in 2 months. I'm not alone in liking it :) Here is the link to it: ruclips.net/video/fgkwkzlVO4w/видео.html
Question: "What was the point of turning twice which starts at 1:57?" The energy of the vocal increases, I reflect the energy increase with double turn :)
"The dance started very well and did not end well enough. I suppose you did not understand the song is ended :)" I dance with my feelings and signals from the song. Not by calculating and guessing especially when it's first time I hear a song and dance at the same time :) The song doesn't signal it's ending so there is no point for dramatic finish. As soon as the song finishes I freeze timely and very accurately. I don't know if it could be done better ;)
It is possible to agree with bariš and also look from another perspective and also be right. Here u take risks, but yet manage to keep dance smoother than usual. The flow is better. I do not like double turn either, there are also moves that did not fully succeed, but we kept it fun. You win or you learn
"Your moves at 1:30 started impressively(followed voice), but you could not continue as it should be. It is okay, this is a social dance :)" I don't get what you mean. At which point I ruin it? :)
![Melvin & Gatica [Glimpse of us ] @ El barrio latino festival 2023 Marsella](/img/1.gif)
Забавно на это смотреть)
Спасибо!
What city and country is this? looks like a fun party.
Hi Aman. This party was in Tallinn, Estonia. Bachata social dance parties are indeed fun with good music and dancers :)
@@TropicalMood thank you! whats your instagram id? would love to connect!
@@amanmeghrajani1 it’s tropical_mood_dance
Overall I did not like your musicality at this dance. I know you can do better which you did many times. I am comparing you with you. The other dancers in that room have no musicality at all.
I did not like the song either. Not many breaks/changes, yes there are some, but the general feeling of the music was boring, and the volume of the singer's voice was the same during the whole song.
Her spins were not perfect(body isolation, sharpness). But she is very flexible and I liked her trance at 0:13 :). Feels like she knows the song.
Your moves at 1:30 started impressively(followed voice), but you could not continue as it should be. It is okay, this is a social dance :)
What was the point of turning twice which starts at 1:57?
The dance started very well and did not end well enough. I suppose you did not understand the song is ended :)
The cameraman needs more practice. He was so stable/strict. The result would not be so different if you put the camera on a tripod.
Starting with the song, I loved it. All songs cannot have equal energy. I understand this song is calmer than you are used to listen. However, it has enough variations to make it interesting to dance with.
Variety doesn't only mean volume change. The pitch of the vocal changes throughout the song. There are staccatos and legatos, accelerations and slowdowns. Focusing only on harsh breaks would be a naive approach to access quality of the song. Try to listen more carefully from this perspective :)
00:17 is a break, isn't it? 00:56 as well. Another break at 1:31. How many breaks you expect in 2 minutes? :)
The original song has 2 million views and 76k likes in 2 months. I'm not alone in liking it :) Here is the link to it:
ruclips.net/video/fgkwkzlVO4w/видео.html
Question: "What was the point of turning twice which starts at 1:57?"
The energy of the vocal increases, I reflect the energy increase with double turn :)
"The dance started very well and did not end well enough. I suppose you did not understand the song is ended :)"
I dance with my feelings and signals from the song. Not by calculating and guessing especially when it's first time I hear a song and dance at the same time :)
The song doesn't signal it's ending so there is no point for dramatic finish. As soon as the song finishes I freeze timely and very accurately. I don't know if it could be done better ;)
It is possible to agree with bariš and also look from another perspective and also be right. Here u take risks, but yet manage to keep dance smoother than usual. The flow is better. I do not like double turn either, there are also moves that did not fully succeed, but we kept it fun. You win or you learn
"Your moves at 1:30 started impressively(followed voice), but you could not continue as it should be. It is okay, this is a social dance :)"
I don't get what you mean. At which point I ruin it? :)