RXJS Observables in Angular - Ward Bell & Sander Ellis

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 дек 2024

Комментарии •

  • @ambikesh1982
    @ambikesh1982 6 лет назад +7

    Great presentation... 52 minutes flew in no time :) learnt a lot. Thanks Ward, Ellis and ngConf :)

  • @VankataKisyov
    @VankataKisyov 4 года назад +1

    The multi stream example with the movies near the end of the video is sooo useful! Thanks for the explanation!

  • @ayoubelhayat9650
    @ayoubelhayat9650 4 года назад +1

    the best video ever made about RXJS. Thank you

  • @javieru5871
    @javieru5871 3 года назад +2

    The Beavis & Butt-Head of the Angular RxJS world!

  • @HoNow222
    @HoNow222 3 года назад

    very funny and light while still informative

  • @rolewis5458
    @rolewis5458 6 лет назад +20

    Jeff Goldblum could teach me anything

    • @philippesimpson
      @philippesimpson 6 лет назад +3

      I'm 13 minutes in. Now I can't unhear, that JG is doing this presentation :D

    • @andrews8725
      @andrews8725 6 лет назад

      I came down to the comments because I was going to post exactly this.

    • @mrclaytron
      @mrclaytron 5 лет назад

      Haha! I thought exactly the same!!!

    • @i-heart-google7132
      @i-heart-google7132 4 года назад

      lol :D now I see jeff goldblum speaking...

  • @viktorsoroka4510
    @viktorsoroka4510 6 лет назад +1

    Nice stuff. One question. I found examples when in ngOndestroy hook after $destroy.next() also the completion method is called $destroy.complete(). Any impact to not call it?

    • @DimitrisK5
      @DimitrisK5 5 лет назад

      It seems it's not needed in this particular case, but I find it is bad form that in a segment about memory leaks, they introduce a "potential" memory leak without at least clarifying why it's handled like that...
      Anyone interested on why calling complete() is not needed, check this: stackoverflow.com/a/44294453.
      I will still be completing those Subjects in my code regardless...

  • @IoTLearner
    @IoTLearner 4 года назад +3

    If someone is looking for the code: github.com/wardbell/rxjs-in-ng

    • @MayankGupta303
      @MayankGupta303 2 года назад

      npm install has lots of errors for me...

  • @dhirenpathak
    @dhirenpathak 6 лет назад +1

    You guys ultimate thanks

  • @Bargains20xx
    @Bargains20xx 5 лет назад

    Cant u use a repeat() in the pipeline instead of error isolation ?

  • @IldarIsm
    @IldarIsm 6 лет назад +1

    Advice to download sources and watch in second screen. Thanks for error isolation is a most needed thing and search input without issues.

  • @LarsRyeJeppesen
    @LarsRyeJeppesen 6 лет назад +1

    I'd say "Happy Days" is a 70s show...

  • @baigfaizan94
    @baigfaizan94 6 лет назад

    can you please share the github link for the example project

    • @hamzachandad399
      @hamzachandad399 6 лет назад +1

      github.com/SanderElias/rxjs-in-ng-angular_berlin

  • @roberturbanski2797
    @roberturbanski2797 6 лет назад

    pipe(catchError) doesn't work to me at all in RxJs 5 when use Observable.of() and error is inside Observable.of(...). The only way is to try { } catch block

    • @michalstan
      @michalstan 4 года назад

      pipe() was introduced with RxJS6

    • @roberturbanski2797
      @roberturbanski2797 4 года назад

      @@michalstan RxJS 5.5

    • @michalstan
      @michalstan 4 года назад

      @@roberturbanski2797 You're right, RxJS 5.5, I always thought it was RxJS 6 :)

  • @brenmazzz
    @brenmazzz 4 года назад

    Sander is Palpatine

  • @fathert
    @fathert 6 лет назад +16

    The content of this video is great, but completely ruined by the guy chipping in all the time with stupid comments.

    • @LxAU
      @LxAU 6 лет назад +4

      I might be the only one (especially going off the existing comments) but I don't agree-I liked the banter and felt it broke the monotony a bit.

    • @altgov3en
      @altgov3en 6 лет назад

      Yeap! So-o-o annoying!

    • @rtpHarry
      @rtpHarry 5 лет назад

      I think they just need to rehearse it a little more so they aren't chopping each other off

  • @JimPreston
    @JimPreston 6 лет назад +12

    I found the guy who cuts into the presentation all the time to be irritating and distracting. Also, Why only 720p? It look bad on modern computers. Even 1080p sucks but 720 is too blurry at full screen.

    • @aaronhoush7184
      @aaronhoush7184 6 лет назад +6

      I agree, I found him incredibly annoying throughout the presentation. If it had information about the presentation, that's one thing, but 90% of it had nothing to do with what was going on. Other than that, it was great.

    • @ibrahimmohammed3484
      @ibrahimmohammed3484 6 лет назад +1

      lol, man i can barely play 480p, appreciate what you have

    • @kriyate5815
      @kriyate5815 6 лет назад +6

      seriously, the second guy's inane comments and cringy attempts at humor make this borderline unwatchable

    • @oncalldev
      @oncalldev 6 лет назад +1

      I have to agree, I'm only 10 minutes into this presentation and I'm not liking this Abbot & Costello presentation format. Assume there are grown-ups in the audience who just want to know the facts.

    • @kirkanos771
      @kirkanos771 6 лет назад

      I have to correct your assertion though. 720p is perfect if the source is also 720p.

  • @8uddishh
    @8uddishh 6 лет назад

    Jeff goldblum