Combating Woke Myths - Only white people can be racist
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
- Episode fifteen of 'Combating Woke Myths' guides you through how to talk to people when they say, "only white people can be racist."
The techniques I offer were inspired by Peter Boghossian and his book How to Have Impossible Conversations. I also see this series as the logical next step past the series we made last year called Woke in Plain English, which can be seen here: ruclips.net/user/pl....
If you appreciate my work, please consider joining my community on Locals, where you can interact with like-minded people. Paid members get exclusive content there like long form interviews, tips on how to deal with Woke ideology and more. Supporting me on Locals allows me to keep making more content, and Locals will never flag or take down my videos because it's a free speech platform.
Check it out here: travisbrown.lo...
#woke #thesignalproductions #thewokereformation #antiwoke
Don't forget to subscribe! And if you like my work, please consider joining me on Locals where you'll get exclusive content. It's a free speech platform, and I'll never have to worry about my content being banned or flagged there. You can interact with my awesome community and myself there, too. travisbrown.locals.com
You should rename it to "How To Argue With Stones".
They can't be reasoned with. They just can't. It's like talking to a Mormon.
Ask them to define: racial harassment, racial discrimination, racial victimisation, under the Equality Act 2010.
I went to a job interview in England. I was interviewed by an Indian (not British). He told me the English aren’t good enough to be employed. I have worked alongside Indians from India. I’ve never met so many racists ie Indian supremacists. I was also verbally abused by three of them, making vile sexual suggestions. Why? Because I would give one of their Indian colleagues a lift into town in the evening as it was on my way home. Sure many were likeable, but a significant number were extremely unpleasant.
@Jason Barnett Idiot. Most Western countries have accepted lots of Indian IR workers because they are cheaper than natives. That’s how the world works.
You're assuming the person wants to have any kind of productive conversation.
That's the point of asking questions. If they don't want to have a productive conversation, it will be obvious pretty rapidly, in which case you can just walk away after stating you disagree.
Woreism isn't a 'conversation', it's a dogma and set of asserted doctrines, meeting the very definition of a religion!
You are expected to accept their dogma, never question it because like religions, it cannot stand up to rigorous questioning or examination.
There are 2 things I am getting really sick of. The first is actual racism which still exists. The second is people who make these ludicrous claims that all White people are racist and all non White people can't be racist. I heard this argument recently that you described here. Even if you accepted their new definition, there are plenty of people of other races in a position of power and they have been racist. The older I get the less patience I have for this nonsense.
"people who make these ludicrous claims that all White people are racist and all non White people can't be racist." No one makes those claims. People claim OTHER people make those claims because they misunderstood the discussion, or they like creating straw men and shit stirring. "Even if you accepted their new definition" It's an amendment: racism+. Racism means the same thing, but the discussion becomes 90% more relevant if we include power relationships. Otherwise it's just name calling. "there are plenty of people of other races in a position of power and they have been racist." Totally true. I understand the frustration: I once spent 90 minutes on an issue before I discovered the entire thing was based on Donald Trump misunderstanding something🤣(or being misrepresented as having misunderstood something. It's all a bit of a cesspool)
Fantastic, thank you!
This is largely accurate. The reason the term has been redefined - or amended, really - is the original definition ignored power relations and created a false equivalence between the racism of a plantation owner and a slave
Power relations are immaterial to the original definition. When discussing some race-based power dynamics, most people employ modifiers like "institutional" or "systemic" to clarify their idea.
The definition was changed by pseudointellectuals to bolster a neo-Marxist, race-based interpretation of society. These pseudointellectuals had painted themselves into a corner by using race to categorize people as oppressors or oppressed, which is, by definition, racism. Their solution was to redefine the word. Any critical thinker out there is not buying their nonsense.