iniBuilds A320neo - RNAV Approach Test | Real Airbus Pilot

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 ноя 2024

Комментарии •

  • @der.Schtefan
    @der.Schtefan 11 месяцев назад +36

    Wait, what? 320simpilot is a Boeing guy now, and 737NGdriver is now Airbus? I haven't been watching RUclips in the last months, when did this happen? Up is down, left is right, everybody is FBW now?

    • @chaophraya8003
      @chaophraya8003 11 месяцев назад +2

      What has happened, is that there actually is a world outside youtube, and the guys has moved on😊 From short haul to long haul 😊

    • @beannosman3855
      @beannosman3855 11 месяцев назад +2

      737NGdriver stopped flying 737’s IRL and started flying airbus.

    • @der.Schtefan
      @der.Schtefan 11 месяцев назад +2

      @@chaophraya8003 What do you mean with "outside"?

    • @Mk3vr97
      @Mk3vr97 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@der.Schtefan outside the sim, 737NGdriver is an actual 737 pilot who has now moved on to fly Airbus

    • @chaophraya8003
      @chaophraya8003 11 месяцев назад

      @@der.SchtefanI mean IRL

  • @mrjacques1
    @mrjacques1 2 месяца назад

    Merci, je pilote airbus depuis longtemps et je ne savais pas qu'on pouvait procéder à une approche automatique en descente avec RNAV.

  • @andrevanzyl5923
    @andrevanzyl5923 5 месяцев назад +1

    I would be more than happy to pay for any future updates like Navigraph and Simbrief integration into the Tablet and MCDU. Inibuilds went above and beyond my expectations for a "freeware" version of the A320neo.

    • @SN57ONE
      @SN57ONE 4 месяца назад

      No FS2Crew unfortunately. That is, unless you are okay with flying single pilot with this thing.

  • @jeremytm
    @jeremytm 2 месяца назад

    Thanks for this! Super helpful. You make it look easy. Been trying to get RNAV to work with NZQN RWY 23 RNP-Y/Z approach starting at ATKIL... but the plane (specifically the Inibuilds A320neo V2) struggles to fly the LNAV path without intervention. I'd love to see a tutorial like this with the V2, but with the NZQN approaches.

  • @gwalker3092
    @gwalker3092 11 месяцев назад

    Thx for video was interesting. Now I have new broadband I can actually watch your videos in 4k on TV and read some of the displays 😅 which is a great help. It’s good see the 320neo is more than flyable even at this stage

  • @martinfendt1305
    @martinfendt1305 11 месяцев назад

    Great video Emanuel! I'm not on Beta, but looking forward to flying this. By the way, could you also please try an RNP-AR with curved segments and see how this Inibuilds aircraft handles it?

  • @jaojao695
    @jaojao695 11 месяцев назад +4

    Looking forward to your impressions on the hand flying of this aircraft. How has it been so far?

  • @Quotenwagnerianer
    @Quotenwagnerianer 11 месяцев назад +3

    Well that is one functionality it has over the FBW. That one still has no working RNAV approache mode.

    • @99domini99
      @99domini99 11 месяцев назад

      I believe it has no go-around track either, does it?

    • @DriveFast_FlyHigh
      @DriveFast_FlyHigh 11 месяцев назад

      This wasn't good enough to make it worth using over FBW. Overshot the track and couldn't maintain speed restrictions. Only thing it did right was altitude.

  • @global6000
    @global6000 11 месяцев назад +2

    Snarp catch about the disconnect sign at minimums. Other deviations on the PFD and ND I think I caught; shouldn’t the V/DEV word and indication be green? And the RNAV 07 indicator on the top of the ND shouldn’t it be connected without the space? Like RNAV07? Also, no FLS capability? Does it do RNP AR approaches?

    • @Tuskin38
      @Tuskin38 11 месяцев назад

      It does not do RNP AR, I think. I know the manual says it can’t do something related to RNP

    • @martinfendt1305
      @martinfendt1305 11 месяцев назад +1

      I do believe in the real aircraft the V/DEV symbology should be green, not magenta

    • @tomstravels520
      @tomstravels520 11 месяцев назад

      @@martinfendt1305think it depends on the EIS version installed. ToLiss has Green for A320 family but magenta for A340

    • @martinfendt1305
      @martinfendt1305 11 месяцев назад

      @@tomstravels520 Yep, but here it's the **A320neo**. So we're talking about the newest EIS EFIS issue standard -- For which I believe V/DEV should be in green.

  • @AyoItsJonn
    @AyoItsJonn 11 месяцев назад

    From the looks on your approach there doesn't seem to be any stutters like most of the people have encounter including me, other than the stutters on final the plane is really great to fly for what it is right now! Can't wait for the full release

    • @A330Driver
      @A330Driver  11 месяцев назад

      I haven't had any stutters indeed.

  • @gabrieldillon11
    @gabrieldillon11 11 месяцев назад +1

    Very interesting video, being relatively new to flight sim, have you done a beginners guide to flying the A320 ? It would be interesting to go through it

    • @chaophraya8003
      @chaophraya8003 11 месяцев назад +4

      Check out 320 simpilot on youtube. He’s done videoes about all you need to know about the A320 😊

  • @Travers18D
    @Travers18D Месяц назад

    Cool video. Need help getting my fmgc (or whatever it’s called) setup though.

  • @coldbloodau
    @coldbloodau 11 месяцев назад

    Thanks another great video.
    Question on the letters for the RNAV and even ILS approaches. Eg ILS Z OR Y and same in RNAV Z or Y
    Which one should you I be using?

    • @tomstravels520
      @tomstravels520 11 месяцев назад +1

      Last time I asked someone about this they said you would choose the Z one if they were all identical but in reality the ATIS would tell you. You have to look for differences in the charts. Some have different go around procedures, some have slightly different descent angles, some are marked LPV only

  • @JuliusZyk
    @JuliusZyk 11 месяцев назад +3

    how does it compares to FBW A20N currently ?

    • @g_pazzini
      @g_pazzini 11 месяцев назад +1

      FBW doesn’t support RNAV approach yet

    • @JuliusZyk
      @JuliusZyk 11 месяцев назад +1

      fair point @@g_pazzini

  • @GodfatherCZ1
    @GodfatherCZ1 11 месяцев назад +1

    She flies pretty well for alpha version tbh 😅 guess it is stupid question , but will there be FLS simulated ? i like it in Fenix , works quite nice now .

  • @dawid9489
    @dawid9489 11 месяцев назад +1

    What does the M mean under CJ512. Is it the point at which you must be flying the aircraft manually or is it minimums? Thank you

  • @ToileBoisee
    @ToileBoisee 11 месяцев назад +1

    hey, could I know what weather addon you're using if you are using one ? the clouds at the start looks like xenviro, looks to good to be default lol

    • @A330Driver
      @A330Driver  11 месяцев назад +1

      Hi, it's default.

  • @Suppokid
    @Suppokid 11 месяцев назад

    Hey, would you ever do RNAV 22L/R approach at Nice? Thanks :)

  • @apmarian
    @apmarian 11 месяцев назад +1

    And how is the frame rate?

  • @gianlucamurella7492
    @gianlucamurella7492 11 месяцев назад

    Welcome to my home.

  • @JoeWilson738
    @JoeWilson738 11 месяцев назад +1

    Anyone having an issue when you do turnarounds with the engines not starting. They always start fine from cold and dark, but when I do a return flight the N2 goes up to about 25-30 and then refuses to start. It’s nothing I’m doing and to get around it I have to click the starter between crank and ignition a few times with the engine master on.

    • @lvwpy
      @lvwpy 11 месяцев назад

      The same happened to me. They eventually started on their own, they just took their time. I have no idea if that's normal, maybe something specific to the LEAP engines?

    • @JoeWilson738
      @JoeWilson738 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@lvwpy It’s not engine specific, the LEAP’s ironically start a tad faster than the PW irl 😂. The first time it happened I let them run up but it took a good 5-6 minutes for a complete start and neither engine gave the “avail” after start. I’ve found since though, if you flick the fuel pumps off while on stand then put them back on just before pushback they start a bit faster, still somthing massively wrong and takes 3 minutes or so, but it’s faster.

  • @verbaan19
    @verbaan19 11 месяцев назад

    Does it have Navigraph charts integration in the EFB? If not, could that be a feature for a future update?

    • @whiffy506
      @whiffy506 11 месяцев назад

      That’s something to ask the developers. This guy isn’t involved in this development.

  • @bogdanluca2382
    @bogdanluca2382 11 месяцев назад

    Can you please explain why you chose conf 3 landing?

    • @A330Driver
      @A330Driver  11 месяцев назад +2

      For the same reason I'd choose 30 over 40 in the 737:
      ruclips.net/video/QFHBAoIOQ40/видео.htmlsi=ym5da6Em1oDpblha

    • @bogdanluca2382
      @bogdanluca2382 11 месяцев назад

      Thank you!

  • @bigtime7724
    @bigtime7724 11 месяцев назад

    How do you program the missed approach into the plane?

    • @britishairways744
      @britishairways744 11 месяцев назад

      It is automatically input in the mcdu, still need to brief it from charts though

  • @ethan5554
    @ethan5554 11 месяцев назад +1

    Does ILS work on this plane?

  • @g_pazzini
    @g_pazzini 11 месяцев назад

    RNAV approach.. the 1 that FBW A320 doesn’t have… nice…

  • @buzzlite3
    @buzzlite3 11 месяцев назад

    No LDEV?

    • @A330Driver
      @A330Driver  11 месяцев назад

      Not all Airbusses have it. I tend to say Fenix "over portraits" It by showing it as default option. For instance none of the busses I've flown actually has it.

    • @tomstravels520
      @tomstravels520 11 месяцев назад

      Typically that’s only for approaches requiring 0.3nm accuracy or less so usually RNP-AR type

  • @stabilo3170
    @stabilo3170 10 месяцев назад

    This bird is no more available in the msfs2020 store. A bit strange, isn't it?

    • @A330Driver
      @A330Driver  10 месяцев назад

      Not strange at all. It contained stolen code from the freeware fly by wire and so Microsoft pulled it off.

    • @stabilo3170
      @stabilo3170 10 месяцев назад

      @@A330Driver Ok, but the FMGC is more advanced on the IniBuilds "version". Looks that there's a big battle on-going for the A320 on MSFS, not surprised because the amount of potential customers is huge.

  • @COURTEN__YT
    @COURTEN__YT 11 месяцев назад

    Is this plane also on xbox aviable?

    • @gabor-toth
      @gabor-toth 11 месяцев назад +1

      It will be available in Sim Update 14, on both Xbox and PC.

    • @nathandrz4008
      @nathandrz4008 11 месяцев назад +1

      Yes it's available if you join the beta

  • @ElitistMagi
    @ElitistMagi 11 месяцев назад +1

    I guess you could say it flies as well as FBW, as it uses same code lul

  • @LighsOut
    @LighsOut 11 месяцев назад

    but why Paliermo?ah i undestand "e" you read "i" but it's italian not english. It's strange cause Palermo is a famous city.....

    • @A330Driver
      @A330Driver  11 месяцев назад

      When I flew for my old airline we had a LOT of Italian cabin crew. They mostly called it "Paliermo".

  • @matterno
    @matterno 11 месяцев назад

    I don't like the plane... bad performance, the approaches are often completely off (descent, localizer) and I cant use the reverse thrust

    • @cyrildu972
      @cyrildu972 11 месяцев назад +3

      It’s a BETA, bad performance are going to be fixed (and it’s great for me BTW) VNAV and LNAV are also going to be improved. For the Reverse trust, Look at the Tablet option

    • @matterno
      @matterno 11 месяцев назад

      @@cyrildu972 I looked at the tablet options and configured it multiple times. I got the Thrustmaster Quadrant. But it wont deploy. Just stay on idle

    • @cyrildu972
      @cyrildu972 11 месяцев назад

      @@matterno I also had an issue with my “TurtleBeach Flying Stick” I then uncheck the option for “Reverse Axis” and then I worked like a charm…you could try that

    • @Tuskin38
      @Tuskin38 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@cyrildu972even less than that, the info page on the MCDU says the aircraft itself is in an alpha state

    • @cyrildu972
      @cyrildu972 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@Tuskin38 for an ALPHA it’s honestly extremely good. The wing an flaps need to be remodeled, some systems need to be improved and a few functionalities and optimization here and there. But honestly I’m super impressed by this free aircraft